Malcolm Gladwell: Working From Home Is Destroying Us!

Malcolm Gladwell is an author who across his six bestsellers has sold millions and millions of books, and his podcast Revisionist History is listened to by millions and millions of listeners every week. Malcolm blessed us with his insights on everything on how to deal with regrets to how to keep the memory of our loved ones alive, from America’s mass incarceration crisis to what was Steve Jobs actually good at? Malcolm’s book, The Bomber Mafia, is out now in paperback, and his podcast, Revision History, is currently releasing its seventh season. Follow Malcolm: Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/malcolmgladwell/ Twitter - https://mobile.twitter.com/gladwell Malcolm's book: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bomber-Mafia-Story-Set-War/dp/024153500X Follow me: https://beacons.ai/diaryofaceo Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Sorry, now I'm getting emotional. Um.

• 0:06Steven Bartlett?

  Malcolm Gladwell.

• 0:07Speaker 00

  Author of five New York Times bestselling books.

• 0:11Steven Bartlett?

  Business guru, a rock star journalist.

• 0:14Speaker 00

  I just want to explain things to people. It's not in your best interests to work at home. If you're just sitting in your pajamas in your bedroom, is that the work life you want to live? We want you to have a feeling of belonging and to feel necessary. And if you're not here, it's really hard to do that. What have you reduced your life to? The language of happiness has to go alongside this question of what contribution you're making to the world you live in.

• 0:41Steven Bartlett?

  If you could make an amazing contribution to society, as you have, at the cost of your own happiness, would you choose that?

• 0:49Speaker 00

  Oh, wow.

• 0:51Speaker 00

  We are social animals. Casting someone out is the great sin. It is not conflict that drives people away. It is neglect. That's when you do harm. Sorry, now I'm getting emotional.

• 1:06Speaker 00

  It's very, I don't know, sorry.

• 1:11Speaker 00

  If we don't feel like we're part of something important, what's the point?

• 1:22Steven Bartlett?

  So without further ado, I'm Steven Bartlett, and this is the Diary of a CEO. I hope nobody's listening, but if you are, then please keep this to yourself.

• 1:38Steven Bartlett?

  Welcome. First of all, I want to say thank you. I feel obliged to because your books, Outliers, Blink, have been very formative for me over the last 10 years. As I was running my businesses and trying to understand certain dynamics that I didn't understand, those books seemed to arrive in my life at the right time. So it's a real honor to get to speak to you today.

• 1:57Speaker 00

  No, thank you.

• 1:59Steven Bartlett?

  Going back then, what are the, you know, you've become a tremendously well-known, highly acclaimed writer and thinker and podcaster. But when I think back to your early years, say before 10 years old, what were the factors that you look back now in hindsight and connect and say, ah, that's the reason I ended up becoming the person I am today?

• 2:22Speaker 00

  Oh, wow. You say before the age of 10.

• 2:25Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, like sub 10.

• 2:27Speaker 00

  Well, I, by, at the age of 10, I had been, I had already lived in three countries.

• 2:34Steven Bartlett?

  Wow.

• 2:35Speaker 00

  Jamaica, and maybe even four. Well, Jamaica, England, and Canada. And it's possible, a brief stint in the United States. So I was well-travelled. Although, you know, you're dimly aware of these things at that age. And I had a, you know, I have an English father and had an English father and a Jamaican mother. So I was conscious of myself as an outsider, a little bit, which I think is very useful. And I was living in that point in kind of southwestern Ontario, the kind of, one of

• 3:19Speaker 00

  the sleepiest, but also most amazing places in the West. I mean, a place of kind of, almost absurdly happy people and no crime or dysfunction and, you know, 10 churches in every village and a kind of, I realize now in retrospect, a kind of magical place to have, I grew up without any kind of broader anxieties. So there was, I was never scared of anything. There was nothing to be scared of when I was, when I was growing up, which I realize now was probably an enormous blessing.

• 4:00Steven Bartlett?

  On that first point of realizing that you're a bit of an outsider, why do you cite that as being a good thing? For a lot of people, that leads to bullying and feeling, you know, feelings of sort of social inadequacy, but why do you say that's a good thing?

• 4:14Speaker 00

  Well, I think of it as liberating. You know, I'll give you a small example. When I first came to Canada, I was six years old. And in rural Canada, when you're six, all the boys had been playing ice hockey since they were, and skating, since they were four. So I remember very distinctly being aware of the fact that everyone played hockey and I didn't. And also being aware of the fact that, wrongly, but I felt that it was too late for me to learn. So I was permanently outside of hockey culture. I was the only boy who didn't play, which is incredibly liberating, which meant I could choose. None of them got to choose what they wanted to do, right? I did. You know, so it was like, I didn't have to participate

• 4:58Speaker 00

  in these kind of compulsory rituals of the Canadian upbringing. And having choices, being an outsider, it does allow you a kind of range of freedom that is denied people who are embedded in a culture.

• 5:15Steven Bartlett?

  And what did you choose?

• 5:17Speaker 00

  Well, eventually, running. But I think I chose just to, you know, the amount of time seven-year-olds spend playing hockey in Canada is enormous. I mean, it's just, so I think I just had more time to read and kind of, it's a full-time job for an eight-year-old or a seven-year-old. You know, I just, I had quite a solitary childhood, which, again, I think was a blessing. You know, I think a lot of, I didn't, I didn't, I had time to kind of indulge my curiosity and read lots of books. And I wasn't kind of, I see a lot of children today pushed into unwanted social interaction. I don't understand why, is it really necessary?

• 6:02Speaker 00

  If you're, if you're seven and you'd rather spend an evening by yourself, isn't that fine? I think it should be fine.

• 6:09Steven Bartlett?

  One of the things that I, you know, I read about in The Story of Success was about the impact that parental involvement to that young age. And this is kind of maybe, maybe somewhat linked to what we're talking about. Parental involvement can have on someone's outcomes. And I, my parents were, I was the youngest child of four. So my parents had resigned to the fact that they had to parent me. So I had this huge freedom. And I think I always cite that as being the reason that I went on to become an entrepreneur, because I had this huge void of independence. But, so I wanted to get your take on, on that. Because that led me to believe that Less parental involvement would lead to greater independence, which would lead to better outcomes.

• 6:50Speaker 00

  Yeah, but except that, yes, I actually completely agree with you, but I wonder whether, you know, the kind of, so if you're describing a kind of benign neglect, which is, which youngest children, I'm also a youngest, often encounter, but benign neglect is not the same as a lack of parental involvement, because it's benign neglect, it's also, it's considered neglect, it's that your parents have simply, they haven't removed a safe structure around you, the structure remains in place, what they've removed, they've just stopped hovering over you. They realize it's no longer necessary or productive, or they no longer have the time for it, but they've, they've not abandoned you.

• 7:31Speaker 00

  So, you know, I think it's, you know, sometimes I think we, those of us who are youngest, do our parents a little bit of a disservice when we, when we, when we describe their absence from our childhood, they're not absent, they're, they're just simply wiser in the, in the way that they, that they, that they, they choose to parent.

• 7:53Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, I thought my parents were absent, but you're right. We still had a, the, the house was still hot, we had a roof over our head, I was still attending school. I got expelled ultimately for like thirty percent attendance, but I was still kind of going.

• 8:07Speaker 00

  Yeah, I did the same thing.

• 8:08Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, I read about that, I thought.

• 8:09Speaker 00

  Yeah, we were similar, but my mother was complicit in my, my mother would, was quite happy if I chose to not.

• 8:16Steven Bartlett?

  Oh, really?

• 8:17Speaker 00

  Well, I think she realized, my mother is quite subversive, in a very, very quiet West Indian kind of way, and I think she understood that if she chose to, I didn't have any great desire to go to, to go to school on a regular basis, I think she realized that if she opposed that desire, she'd make it worse, so she decided instead to endorse it, and so it kind of, she sort of diffused whatever rebellious intent I had, just by saying, she would sign fake notes for me to give to the principal, I mean, she was.

• 8:51Steven Bartlett?

  Wow. Wow. What about your father? What was he like? He said you were very, very competitive. I read that somewhere.

• 8:59Speaker 00

  Yeah, he, I think he thought, I think he was competitive. I don't know whether, I think, I was quite competitive, but in a kind of at games and at running. My father was a very, very Englishman. He was from Kent. He was, he liked dogs and gardening and long walks in the rain. He was exceedingly intelligent, but it combined with a kind of humility that was, and I realize that as I get older, it's the humility that was the more important aspect of his personality.

• 9:41Speaker 00

  So he would never, he was probably smarter than most people he met, but he would never, ever make that explicit. And he was, if he thought that you even had a slight edge of knowledge in some domain over him, he would defer to you, which made him incredibly curious. He was curious about everything and would ask. He had friendships with people who had dropped out of school at the age of 10. I mean, he was, and he was a man with a PhD in, you know, in mathematics. So he was a wonderful, he was, he was a really wonderful role model for a, for a little boy.

• 10:21Steven Bartlett?

  Well, how did you and why and how did you learn the value of that humility? And the impact and the importance of it when you're dealing with other people?

• 10:31Speaker 00

  Well, I think it's because you can't be a good journalist unless you have a kind of baseline respect for what others can teach you. If you're going to interview, be a good interviewer, you must enter into every interview with the expectation that you know less, that the person you're interviewing has something to tell you. Right, and that's actually much more difficult than it sounds. Because in normal conversation, we have an urge to assert ourselves and we think we have a kind of intellectual advantage, informational advantage. That's why we, you watch people talk, interruptions are all about, often about the other person asserting

• 11:15Speaker 00

  their superiority on that point. Someone says, "Oh, it'll take me forever to get here." The other person says, "No, it won't," right? You can't be a journalist if, you have to turn that off if you want to be an effective interviewer. You have to trust that this person ultimately can teach me something that I can't learn on my own, even if in the moment, I'm not getting anywhere. You just have to quiet that voice and let them keep going and keep, you know, asking the right kind of questions. That requires an assertion of humility. It took me years to kind of perfect that as a journalist. And I would watch it, when I worked at the Washington Post, I would watch the great journalists and they all had that.

• 11:58Speaker 00

  They just, that ability to kind of, to make it plain to whoever they were talking to, "I know less than you. That's why I'm having this, that's why we're having this conversation." Right? It's a beautiful, it's a beautiful thing when it's done, when it's done well.

• 12:12Steven Bartlett?

  It's got me reflecting on various people. One of the people that made me reflect on it interestingly was Joe Rogan, how he feels like such a bridge to his audience listeners, because he does come across as being tremendously humble regardless of who he's speaking to. He always seems to understate his intelligence as well. He always calls himself a monkey.

• 12:30Speaker 00

  Yes. He has a kind of, yeah. Well, he, yes, he, well, he has this wonderful thing where he can put himself, he's squarely in the position of his listeners, which is really, you know, for a, for a host of, of any kind of show like that is, if you can do that, you're gonna win, you're gonna win, right? He, there's, there's, he's, he's having the conversation that his listeners wish they could be having with, with the subjects in his, in his, on his show.

• 13:04Steven Bartlett?

  On that point of journalism, at what point in your, your early years did you, was there any inclination that you might become a journalist? You might go into that profession, if any?

• 13:16Speaker 00

  Never in New York. I mean, I had thought about, I liked writing. I didn't imagine that it was a profession. It didn't occur to me that you could actually make a living doing it. So I always was thinking of other things I wanted to do. And then I kind of fell into it by accident after my, after I graduated from university. So I, I never really, I just, I thought it was something you did on the side, you know, I didn't, it seemed unimaginable that somebody would pay you to do this kind of work.

• 13:45Steven Bartlett?

  Lack of role models, a lack of examples?

• 13:49Speaker 00

  I mean, I think it's a, it's a little bit of a, if I had grown up in, you know, New York or Toronto or London, I would have been much more aware of people who, who, who, you know, were in the creative professions. But I grew up in a town of 4,000 people. There were no one, there was no one in my town who made a living in the creative professions, right? You, you wouldn't live in a small town like that and do that. So I didn't know, I have friends who grew up in, you know, Manhattan and they, they knew, they knew film, filmmakers and actors and, you know, fiction writers and as part of their parents' circle when they're growing up. I knew none of that.

• 14:29Steven Bartlett?

  What advice would you give to, to people around that age? Say that, you know, early twenties, just maybe just graduated and thinking about going off into the world? Cause I hear a lot of these, these stories about certain small factors can have such a tremendous impact on your outcomes, like the city you live in. Would you encourage younger people to go and get into those big cities if they're, if they're trying to have careers in things like journalism or media or whatever, or business? And how much of a, how much of a swing does that have? Cause I always think, you know, I'm on Dragon's Den and I see these entrepreneurs coming in and pitching tech companies. And I always think, sometimes I think you're at like a 90% disadvantage versus just being over there on the west coast of America in San Francisco.

• 15:12Steven Bartlett?

  I think sometimes I think it's more than a 90% disadvantage, but situational and environmental factors on outcomes.

• 15:19Speaker 00

  It's always been this puzzle in many countries, but particularly the United States, about why do immigrants do so well? And, you know, the, one of the explanations was immigrants to the United States have always been very aggressive about seeking educational opportunities. Or maybe they brought with them education. So that was one argument for the longest time. But now we realize, actually, it's less that and more that they, unlike many people, many Native Americans, are willing to move where opportunities are. So the immigrants are mobile in a way. They don't have any roots. They don't have family that's keeping them in one place or another.

• 15:59Speaker 00

  They simply make a beeline for the places where they can, you know, further their own economic and personal interests the quickest and the most efficiently. Native, native people don't do that because they have too many encumbrances. And I, so my advice to people, young people, is always, where do you want to move? It's the first question you should ask yourself. Your default should be, you're going to move somewhere, right? Don't fall in the trap of doing, when you're 23, of doing the comfortable thing and staying near family and friends. That's, there'll be plenty of time for that later. The only question on your mind should be, where should I move? And once you decide where you move, I think a lot of other things fall into place.

• 16:43Speaker 00

  So if you are someone who imagines that you would like to start a company in the tech world, then yeah, move to Northern California, or Austin, Texas, or Tel Aviv, or whatever, you know, go where the, I think you're absolutely right. You need to go where the opportunity is. It's not going to come to you magically. And you are at a huge disadvantage if you're not there. It's, it's just no question about that. People have confused the efficiency of digital communication, the kind of, the logistical efficiency of digital communication, with emotional efficiency and kind of psychological efficiency. It is, it is only logistically efficient.

• 17:24Speaker 00

  It does not resolve, it doesn't help someone trust you more, or take a chance on you, or get to know you in all of your complexity. Yes.

• 17:33Steven Bartlett?

  I wish, yeah. It's one of the things my parents said to me at a very young age was we lived in Devon, which is, you know Devon, right down in the corner on the farms. And they were very clear at a young age. They said, you've got to leave here. So just so you're all well aware, for the four of us, you have all got to go out of this city. So when we were all very clear on that, and all of my friends are still there, every single one of them. All of my best friends are still in Plymouth. But even if they went to university in another city, they came back. It's not to say that they're not happier than me. And this is maybe my next question, which is, because I hear that immigrant tale all the time, that immigrants tend to have better outcomes relatively, whatever it might be. But my question becomes, are they happier? And I say this actually because of a conversation I was having last night with my friend who has

• 18:18Steven Bartlett?

  built, his family have built a billion dollar company in this country. The dad was the first generation immigrant here. The dad is just completely overwhelmed with work, like he is obsessed, to the point now the son said to me last night, I don't actually think he knows what makes him happy at all. But because he was in survival mode when he came here, they've got a billion dollar, it's actually, I think it was worth five billion now. But is he happy? And I sometimes ponder that the first sort of generation immigrant is on survival mode. The second generation has the chance of being in a, maybe a thriving self-actualization situation. But I don't know if you had any light to shed on first generation happiness?

• 18:56Speaker 00

  I'm always, I'm dubious of this. So I, all this happiness stuff, and I say this, and I'm fully open to the possibility that I'm wrong. But my understanding of happiness is, because of the research on happiness, is that it's a fairly stable trait. In other words, there are people who are happy, regardless of where they are, and people who are not, or people who don't appear happy, or people for whom happiness represents itself differently. So I would say of your friend's father, you know, maybe he is happy, he just expresses it differently. He built

• 19:35Speaker 00

  a massive business, he's made his family stable, he's created a secure beachhead in a whole new country. You don't think that makes him happy when he puts his head on the pillow at night? I think it probably does. It's just not, it's not the kind of lie on the beach, read a good book happy. But it sounds to me like a Pretty amazing set of accomplishments that would make him, will he die happy having done that? Yes, he will, I think. I don't know, I never met the man, but I'm just, I'm wondering.

• 20:06Steven Bartlett?

  Billionaires generally.

• 20:07Speaker 00

  What's that?

• 20:08Steven Bartlett?

  People say they've never met a happy billionaire.

• 20:09Speaker 00

  I just don't, I don't believe that. I think they derive, I think people who've, who've accomplished something like that, they derive a different kind of satisfaction from it. But it doesn't, it's not a lesser kind of satisfaction. Um, you know, do I work more than most people? If I look at the cohort of people I went to college with, university with, do I work more than most of them? Yeah, probably. Do I spend less time, you know, uh, watching movies and reading books and going on holiday? Yes, absolutely. Does that mean I'm less happy? No, I, it's like, I'm pretty happy.

• 20:50Speaker 00

  You know, I don't have a problem with, I, you know, I just like, and I, I just, I, yeah, that's, I'm a little bit skeptical of this narrow definition of happiness.

• 21:01Steven Bartlett?

  So, so I think, I think it's based on this idea that to be happy or whatever, you have to have this kind of recipe of ingredients and they have to be equally balanced. You have to have, you know, strong interpersonal relationships or meaningful connections. You have to have, you know, exercise, you know, these kinds of things. So when you see an individual who's so out of balance because they, they just worked when, you know, every waking hour of every day and they don't make time for friends, families or walking the dog, people, and they're, you know, consumed by it, people from the outside go, well, that's, that's not a happy person. And you would, I would think the science would support the fact that people tend to be happier when they have stronger, more meaningful relationships and they have more, more balance in their lives generally.

• 21:46Speaker 00

  Yeah. No, I think, so you understand, I'm making, so let's go back to your friend's father. So your friend's father is not someone about whom we can generalize.

• 21:56Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 21:57Speaker 00

  Uh, he's clearly a, you know, he's an outlier of some sort. He's probably, he's in a, I imagine there's a whole series of traits that he's in the 99th percentile on, probably incredibly intelligent, incredibly driven, you know, list them all. So that kind of person is never going to have. A balanced life. I mean, you could put him in, you know, the, the, the, the cornfields of Iowa and say, you're going to be a, you're going to be a farmer. That's all you can do. And he's gonna, he's gonna live, he's gonna be someone who's like working, you know, 80 hours a week and right? That's just his temperament. So the question is, what I'm saying is happiness

• 22:39Speaker 00

  for him is probably going to look differently than happiness for lots of other people, but he's highly unusual. For the average person, yes, balance is, is appropriate, but you didn't ask me about an average person. You asked me about someone who's built, built an enormous business from scratch.

• 22:57Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, I worry, I think I worry sometimes. Part of the reason I think I ask the question is for myself, that I'm being dragged by my own like insecurities. So I sit here with a lot of, you know, successful, maybe billionaire CEOs that have built these great companies. And you find out that the reason they built them is because their mother, in the case of one of my previous guests, which was on two weeks ago, who, and he said this on the podcast, he's got a billion dollar beer company. You, you find out it's because his mother, when he was a young kid, basically always convinced him he was never enough. She'd come into his room, smash his toys and say things to him to convince him that he was just never good enough. So he's had this almost neurotic obsessive drive to prove to the world that he is good enough. And you wonder how voluntary that, that, that drive is and what it's come at the cost of. And is he really, you know, is this individual

• 23:40Steven Bartlett?

  really happy and fulfilled? Or are they just being pulled by their insecurities?

• 23:45Speaker 00

  But you know, there are, maybe another way of saying this is that, so to use that person as an example. So he took a, a, a kind of trauma and made something productive out of it. It, it had a great deal of certain personal costs, but he took something that might have defeated others and ended up contributing substantially to society. I wouldn't, he may not be happy, but I would describe his life as a triumph. Right? And the other thing I would say is that the language of happiness has to go alongside this question of what contribution you're making to the world you live in, that there are many people who are not personally happy,

• 24:28Speaker 00

  but who make enormous contributions. And that's, that's a parallel and in many cases, far more important function, you know, was Florence Nightingale happy? Probably not. She's, I was thinking to hell from what I know about her life, she had all kinds of psychological issues or whatever, but she made an enormous contribution that continues to this day, right? She started a whole, you know, so there are, like I said, I would like to have a kind of, I would like to the, to evaluate people's lives along a whole series of dimensions and understand that not everyone can satisfy each of those dimensions in any moment.

• 25:09Steven Bartlett?

  One of those, you know, being happy feels like something that I would like. For me, making a great contribution to society feels like something that others would like from me. And I wonder, you know, which, if you could make a huge, this is just a rough and a tangent here, but if you could make an amazing, you know, contribution to society as you have, at the cost of your own happiness, would you choose that?

• 25:36Speaker 00

  Depends on what the contribution was.

• 25:38Steven Bartlett?

  The contribution you've made in your life, you've, you've helped millions and millions of people.

• 25:40Speaker 00

  Oh, I see. Would I have done what I did if I thought it was coming at a significant cost to my own happiness?

• 25:47Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 25:49Speaker 00

  Probably not, but then I think the world's, you know, but if I was doing, if I was a, you know, a biologist who had, working on a breakthrough for some disease, I might, the calculation might be different. I mean, I'm not saving lives. I'm entertaining people or enlightening them. But if it didn't read me, they would be enlightened somewhere else. I'm not crucial to the functioning of society. But if I was. I might feel very differently. I think, you know, it's funny, the I'm I'm over here because I have this book now in paperback, The Bomber Mafia, and it's the story of these

• 26:33Speaker 00

  group of men, pilots in the 1930s in America, who have a dream about a better way to fight wars. And they're all down in Alabama. And they have these ideas about how the bomber, high altitude precision bombing, can revolutionize warfare and save countless civilian lives. Their dream turns out to be they can't pull it off in the Second World War. They they start out the war with high hopes. And by the end, many of them have had their careers destroyed because they pursued an idea which didn't work. It didn't work at the time. Now it does work. They really pioneered a kind of warfare that is essential to the

• 27:15Speaker 00

  way we think about war today and is as today, you know, saves countless lives. Didn't work in their timeframe. So in a sense, they sacrificed their career and large part of their happiness for a for a future cause. They were long dead before it paid off. Am I glad they did that? Absolutely. Would they be glad if you resurrected some of these guys from the dead? And you said, Look, I know in 1936, you had a vision about how to make war better. And it was finally realized during the Kosovo campaign of the 90s, 60 years later. Are you happy you did what you did? And you do you feel now that it was worth sacrificing your entire

• 27:57Speaker 00

  career over this lost cause? Because it turned out not to be a lost cause. And they would I'm sure from the grave, they would say, I am so grateful that I did what I did. Right? Even though one of these guys, one of them, one of the heroes of the book is a man named Heywood Hansel. He was this brilliant, passionate

• 28:15Speaker 00

  Romantic figure in the Second World War, who has this extraordinary, this set of ideas of how to revolutionize the air war in the Second World War, which he tries and fails to implement in the war against Japan. And by his, by the age of 40, he's, this is a man who devoted his life to the air force. He's a career, his father and grandfather, they're all like career military officers. He, this is his whole world. He's basically through by the, by his late 30s. He's just pushed out to pasture and spends the next 30 years of his life, basically, as the guy who failed in the Second World War, right? He would say it was worth it, I think, if you-

• 29:00Steven Bartlett?

  Do you think so?

• 29:01Speaker 00

  Yeah, I think he did. I think he would. And I'm, we should all be enormously grateful to him for making that sacrifice.

• 29:09Steven Bartlett?

  I, I, I am grateful for them for making that sacrifice, but I tend to believe that people are more motivated by their own ego than they typically often allow. Their own sense of like wanting to accomplish something so they can be someone that accomplished something. And I, I tend to actually think this probably from doing this podcast so much where I often get to the root cause of a successful person's achievements and find out it was just, time and time again, it was just an insecurity from their childhood. It was, they had, you know, they were bullied, they were beaten up. And it's this almost involuntary pursuit to prove the bully. My mom being outcasted and being only black in an all white school,

• 29:53Steven Bartlett?

  to, to fit in or to prove someone wrong. And if, and then you look at it from the outside and you clap and go, oh, they were courageous or they were brave. It's like, no, they were insecure.

• 30:03Speaker 00

  So why, wait, why, why does it bother you that insecurity manifests itself as courage?

• 30:09Steven Bartlett?

  It absolutely doesn't. I, I did a, a tour of this country where I opened the show and say, you call me brave. I was actually just insecure. So it doesn't bother me. I just think it's reality. And the reality, we don't talk, and I think obviously in hindsight bias, we, we say, oh, this person was so courageous. They were so intentional. They had the, most of the time they were just insecure. Like they didn't get Christmas presents and they were brave.

• 30:28Speaker 00

  But that makes, I like that though, because to me, to my mind, it makes courage far more accessible. When we realize that courage can have many, many fathers.

• 30:36Steven Bartlett?

  I love it.

• 30:37Speaker 00

  Yeah. I think it's beautiful. It's a beautiful notion. And the idea that people can take- What can be harmful, damaging, traumatic things like I was saying before and spin them into gold is this is the this is the at the heart of what is so kind of joyful about the human spirit, right? It's it's incredible like.

• 31:00Steven Bartlett?

  That was actually the headline of the Guardian newspaper two weeks ago was my face with the title that said insecurity was my greatest motivator. And it was and it was because I never understood this idea that I was because I expelled from school, dropped out of university after one lecture. I never understood this idea that other people thought I was brave. When in really, I was like a coward running away from things I didn't like fueled by insecurities. Like, I was actually cowardice in security, if you're really being honest.

• 31:25Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 31:25Steven Bartlett?

  And so go match your point about these, you know, these these people from the 1950s.

• 31:31Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 31:32Steven Bartlett?

  1950s.

• 31:32Speaker 00

  30s.

• 31:33Steven Bartlett?

  I wonder what their driving underlying force was because.

• 31:38Speaker 00

  Well, they were. It's funny. So there's a little group of men and they call themselves the bomber mafia. And they are they're all in their 20s. They're young men in the 1930s. And they're in the army. And there's no such thing as the air force in the 1930s anywhere. And air force is a division of the of the army in most countries. And the people running armies in the 1930s think planes are a joke. They're a toy, right? And here are these young guys. And they actually think planes are what the future of warfare is. And they feel they feel overlooked and ignored. And they're, you know, in the 1930s, if you were in the army, you had

• 32:22Speaker 00

  to spend time, you know, learning how to ride a horse because cavalry was still a thing. And they would, you know, you'd have to groom your horses and, you know, trot around the and these guys think this is a joke, right? They're just this is the most absurd thing they've ever seen. Why are we riding horses when we've invented this thing called an airplane, which can fly hundreds of miles and drop bombs and revolutionize warfare? And no one's listening to them. And they they are.

• 32:51Speaker 00

  They feel like they're outcasts who are in an institution that they don't belong in. And they're really at a loss. And their solution is, they're all up in Virginia, right around where military headquarters is in America. They decide to, as a group, move to the most remote air force base in America, which, when they say remote, meaning as far as possible psychologically from Washington DC. So they move to this little tiny corner of central Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama, which even today, Montgomery, Alabama is the middle of nowhere. And they want to be off by themselves and left a kind of dream.

• 33:36Speaker 00

  And they have a massive chip on their shoulder about who they believe to be the morons running the army. So again, you have a, and they spark this kind of technological revolution. They dream big and reimagine what war can be. But it's all born of frustration, isolation, alienation. Rejection. Rejection. I mean, it's exactly what you're talking about here. Their motives, they come across as these heroic idealists and these brilliant technological thinkers. That's not, that's not how it begins psychologically. They're disgruntled.

• 34:19Speaker 00

  It begins as these kind of lonely, upset, disgruntled. They're like, I'm sorry, we're out of here. We're going to Alabama. And they would, they would gather, it's only about 10 of them. And they're on this, I've been to this air force base even today. It's like, it is literally in the middle of nowhere. And they're just like, don't call, you know, basically they're like, we're hiding down here. Don't call us. We're like, and you know, as it happens, such a marvelous story. The Second World War then breaks out when they're in the middle of all of this dreaming. And there's no one else who's been thinking about. Air war policy. And so all of these disgruntled guys get whisked out of Alabama and they occupy all the top positions in the US Air Force at the beginning of the Second World War.

• 35:03Speaker 00

  So by magic, by sheerest chance, this group of misfits gets plunked into the center of the American military machine when America enters the war in 1942. So it's like they get a lucky break. I mean, if, if the Second World War never happened, they might still be there.

• 35:24Speaker 00

  You know, fussing and groaning and grumbling and which is this other thing that, you know, thing that I've observed in, I'm sure you've seen the same thing in doing this, in doing this podcast, is the amount of times that sheer serendipity unleashes this, allows the innovator to turn their disgruntlement and neurosis into gold, right? It's just something random happens and boom, that they, they see a window and they think, that's it, right? That's a shaft of light. That's my light. But if the window been closed, they could still be disgruntled and running around.

• 36:03Steven Bartlett?

  History will never know, the history will never remember that. We never look back and see that, that outcome. So even in that case, it sounded like that, one of their initial driving motivators was more like, I told you so. So going back to your point about would they be happy today? Because they never got that particular, I told you so moment before they.

• 36:22Speaker 00

  Before they died, no. They, yes, they would have had to live to, you know, a hundred and hundred years old to get, to get their I told you so moment. The question I would have liked to ask them is, did they, did they still have faith at the time of their death that their vision would be realized at some point? So there's a whole class of, of innovators who pursue an idea and then they're just early, right? And it comes to fruition afterwards. There's a famous case of a, I've forgotten his name, but there was an American biochemist who had this idea for how to fight cancer tumors by starving the.

• 37:09Speaker 00

  Cancer tumors grow, you know, blood feeds them. They have all these blood vessels that they connect. That's how they, and his idea was let's choke the supply of blood to tumors and we can kill them that way. And it's called angiogenesis. And is it called angiogenesis? Someone will correct me. Anyway, he had this idea in the sixties and he, it takes him sort of 30 years to figure out that it works. And I've often wondered, and then he dies, but he gets, he, just before he dies, he has this kind of finally, boom, he demonstrates that his life's ambition actually works. I've always wondered, had he died like just before the moment of, would he

• 37:50Speaker 00

  have died happy? Did he die believing it would someday come, his, his notion, which is, which is kind of, if you think about it, it's, it's intuitively, it makes sense. If I can starve the tumor of, of its blood supply, I should be able to choke the tumor. That's, it's, as an idea, if I just explain that to you, none of us knew anything, I'm guessing about medicine. It makes sense, right? So he has this idea in 1960, whatever it is. And I think his faith was strong enough that had he died before proof of concept, he would still have died happy. I think. I don't know, though. I would love to have asked him that, to ask him that hypothetical question.

• 38:34Steven Bartlett?

  I mean, another thing I've learned from this podcast is generally that the destination is just a thing, that goal, ultimate goal is just a thing that gives us orientation, but we're always on a journey. And I imagine if he had accomplished that one, he would have set off on another one, another journey. So one would assert that because he was striving towards a meaningful goal. I always say, you know, when people ask me what I want for my life now, I say, if I'm striving towards a meaningful goal surrounded by people I love, and I'm feel, I feel somewhat challenged, I am happy. Yeah. And the minute I'm no longer striving, so the goal is complete, I'm around people I love, and it's not challenging me, it's not the outside, sort of the outer limit of my comfort zone, then I, then you're not satisfied. So he sounds like someone that was striving towards a goal, a meaningful goal, that was challenging him. So I imagine.

• 39:17Speaker 00

  Except that lots of other people began to believe.

• 39:23Speaker 00

  That he was wasting his time. So he has that. He has, he is surrounded by a small core of people who believe in him. And presumably a long suffering wife. But the general world in which he's operating is rolling their eyes by the end.

• 39:38Steven Bartlett?

  And that's his, that's his challenge.

• 39:40Speaker 00

  That's his challenge. So I mean, that, by the way, as you know, incredibly typical of. I mean, this, this goes into one of, I'm, I'm actually obsessed with this. And this is one of the things I wanted to write the Barrow Mafia because it is a perfect example of this idea that is incredibly simple, but is so often overlooked when we look at innovation. Everyone, including the innovator, radically underestimates how much time it takes to bring an idea to fruition. So the reason most innovators do what they do is not that they have a clear picture. But rather they are, they are massively deluded about their own, their own idea.

• 40:20Speaker 00

  They think it's so obvious and they should be able to pull it off in, you know, five years. If they realized it would take 30, they would never do it, right? So their, their, their success is based on the delusion. They're by definition delusional. And every, but everyone, everyone involved always thinks that just because I can describe it clearly. And I can make a case for what I'm doing. I should be able to will it into being overnight. Right? And I, I, there's not a single. Can you come up with a single significant innovation that took less time than the innovator imagined?

• 40:58Steven Bartlett?

  No.

• 40:59Speaker 00

  It just never happens.

• 41:00Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, for so many reasons. Yeah, I mean, legislations that want to often the big one.

• 41:04Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 41:04Steven Bartlett?

  Like gets in the way of anything.

• 41:06Speaker 00

  There's a hundred reasons why everything is, takes longer.

• 41:08Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 41:10Speaker 00

  Like the, the Barrow Mafia honestly believed in an idea they hatched about. Completely revising the way wars fought. They thought that you could fight a war entirely from the air. You would no longer need armies, tanks, Navy, anything. All you would need is bombers. They thought you could fight the entire Second World War with a fleet of bombers. Okay. They had this idea in 19, let's say, 35. They thought they could pull it off. When the war starts in 1942, they thought they could pull it off seven years later. We can't even pull it off today. We're getting close. But like, it's been, they underestimated how long it would take to bring this idea to fruition. By like, basically half a century. Right? That's the depths of their, but everyone has this delusion. Do you know how long?

• 41:53Speaker 00

  My favorite example is the automated teller machine, the cash machine, is invented, if I'm not mistaken, in the early 1970s. Now, if the guy who invented it, there's a guy, forgotten his name. We had him right here, right now. And we said, when you came up with the idea in whatever it was, 1973, how long do you think it would take to spread this idea throughout the entire world? He would have told you it'll be all done by 1980. It's a no-brainer. Couldn't be easier. I'm making everyone's life easier. Banks like it, consumers like it. It's cash out of a machine. All you gotta do is punch in a code. This is the, this is not like computers or I'm not changing anyone's life. Everyone wins.

• 42:38Speaker 00

  You know how long it actually took? It took 25 years.

• 42:41Steven Bartlett?

  To make an ATM machine?

• 42:42Speaker 00

  To make it popular. ATM machines take, they're not, so they're invented in the early 70s and they're not really everywhere until the mid 90s in the West.

• 42:53Steven Bartlett?

  Why?

• 42:54Speaker 00

  They don't, you tell me. Took a long time.

• 42:58Steven Bartlett?

  Consumer behavior's gotta change, then they gotta make space for them and safety.

• 43:02Speaker 00

  Turns out, it's complicated. Consumers took a long time to, my mother is still not taking any money out of an ATM. You know, so, you know, she's still, I mean, she's ninety, she may eventually. But, you know, it turns out people, the thing that that guy and all of us didn't understand is that when it comes to how we handle, how we deal psychologically with money, we are extremely conservative. So I can give you the, I can sit you down and say, never have to line up in a bank again, twenty-four hour access to money, and you will still, it'll take a generation for you to warm up to it.

• 43:41Steven Bartlett?

  A generation, yeah, that's it, isn't it? Because a generation has got to pass because they're too stubborn to change. Interesting. You write a lot about this idea of timing. You've written about it in Outliers, I believe, about the importance of timing. Now, everything you've said there makes me feel maybe a little bit scared as an innovator and entrepreneur because I might be fifty years out. And listen, I'm trying to quench these insecurities now, so I can't wait fifty years. What have you learnt about how we can

• 44:11Steven Bartlett?

  improve our timing, or understand if our timing is good? Is that even possible? Is it possible to know if our timing is good when it comes to inventing things, creating things, launching a podcast? Are we too late? People say that to me a lot. Is this too late to be starting a podcast, you know?

• 44:27Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 44:30Steven Bartlett?

  Is timing something we can control, or does it just live in hindsight?

• 44:33Speaker 00

  I, well, I do think, a lot of people claim

• 44:38Speaker 00

  to understand timing, and really what they're doing is, they were just lucky. And they're, after the fact, assigning themselves, you know, a pat on the back for what, that is not to say, though, that there aren't people who have a kind of, at least in flashes, have their finger on the pulse of some kind of marketplace.

• 45:01Steven Bartlett?

  Steve Jobs comes to mind with.

• 45:03Speaker 00

  Yeah. The thing about Steve Jobs, of course, is that he's not a pioneer in anything. So he's always late, he's late to every market that he eventually wins. So his genius was in understanding that being first is massively overrated. He's ten, he's ten years late on the smartphone, he's. You know, every, all of the ideas that go into the first, the Macintosh computer are all taken from Xerox PARC. He didn't invent any of that stuff. He's, so his genius was in understanding that if you are the first person in, you're probably too early.

• 45:38Steven Bartlett?

  Interesting.

• 45:38Speaker 00

  But also, and he understands as well that, that in that world of consumer electronics, you're better off being the person who tweaks the idea than the person who truly innovates. In other words, what consumers are interested in is a kind of mature experience with their electronics. The, the average consumer doesn't be the, want to be the one who's pioneering how to work a kind of, you know, stage one laptop or home computer, or they don't want the, remember the, I don't know if you remember the Palm Pilot. Palm Pilot was an early, a way too early smartphone. That was big in the kind of nineties. And it, it was for,

• 46:22Speaker 00

  it was used by a very small number of very technically, technologically focused people. Jobs would have looked at that and said, you're never going to win selling a Palm Pilot. It's just not, you need to kind of tweak it two steps and make it something that an average person would want to use. He was very commercial in the way that he approached product innovation. That was his genius. So he's, in some sense, I think he is, he is exactly what you're talking about. Someone who, who had an uncanny sense of how to bring something to a mass market.

• 46:59Steven Bartlett?

  And when the time was right to do so.

• 47:01Speaker 00

  Yeah. Although he, yes, when the, when the time, and when the time was right, yeah. He, he did a very good job of never being too early.

• 47:10Steven Bartlett?

  It's a weird concept of being too early, but not one that people are that familiar with. Between the ages of 24 and 34, you spent 10 years working at the Washington Post?

• 47:19Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 47:19Steven Bartlett?

  What was, what did you, you know, that was your 10,000 hours per se. What did that give you that in hindsight, you realize has been so sort of foundational and important and significant to what you went on to do? Those, those 10 years?

• 47:33Speaker 00

  Well, it taught me when I was talking earlier about that thing about reporting requiring a kind of fundamental humility. That was hammered home in those years. I also learned to write without anxiety. So you can't be a newspaper reporter if you have any neuroses whatsoever about the act of writing. You just have to, you know, you have a limited amount of time, the discipline of being forced to write something every day in a limited amount of time for 10 years cured me of

• 48:15Speaker 00

  writer's block, writing anxiety, you know, you can't be that way, you know, it's just like, it's like a, it's like a boot camp for writers. It just is, it, that was enormously useful in, in kind of freeing me up to spend my mental energies on other parts of the writing process, right?

• 48:39Steven Bartlett?

  What about writing generally and the value that and role that writing has played on your self-awareness, your personal development? Because, you know, we're living in a generation, I think, where writing is becoming less popular and maybe even less necessary. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not. But I, because I do this podcast, because I have other obligations to write, because I have an Instagram following of millions of people that expect me to write things every day, I started having to write, like it was a discipline. I had to do it at 7:00 PM, I had to post something. And only in hindsight, I've reflected on how much that changed my life. It helped me understand the world I was living in because every day I have to say something that's true.

• 49:23Steven Bartlett?

  And in hindsight, I go, fuck, I wish someone had told me how, how much I think I could advance my wisdom, understand myself, just by having, having some kind of commitment to publish every day, more from like a personal perspective, you know? I'm wondering if that's, if it's, if you found a similar thing. I tend to think writers, people that have a, something making them write every day and publish are infinitely, just so much more wise and incredibly more self-aware. Similar thing with podcasters, to be fair.

• 49:55Speaker 00

  So I think of curiosity as a habit, not a trait.

• 49:59Speaker 00

  And I think that too often, we think of it as a trait, not a habit. By that distinction, I mean, it's not, people are not naturally curious or not naturally curious. They, there are people who have cultivated the habit of curiosity and those who have let it lie fallow. What you're describing is an institutionalized, a way of institutionalizing the habit of curiosity. If you are required to write something every day, then you are, you've put yourself in a position where you're forced to think about and look for things to write about every day. That's institutionalizing the habit of curiosity, right? I think all successfully curious people do that in one form or another.

• 50:44Speaker 00

  Put themselves in situations where they have to come up with some new idea or have to, are forced to look for interesting new things or, you know, why, you know, anyone who has ambition does this for many people. The idea, you know, ambition is very often rooted in a sense of dissatisfaction with your current state of knowledge or practice. What does, what does dissatisfaction do? It is another institutionalization of the habit of curiosity. It forces your, your, your unhappiness and dissatisfaction with what you know

• 51:24Speaker 00

  forces you to go out and look for a solution to that feeling, right? Find things that to keep going and, you know, instead of stopping, get up and look again. And so these are all versions of the same, of the same thing. So I sort of agree with you that there's writers who have obligations, writing obligations, do, it's a tremendous advantage in terms of, of, of pushing, pushing them to kind of think freely about things.

• 51:59Steven Bartlett?

  The tipping point in, you wrote that book in 2000?

• 52:04Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 52:05Steven Bartlett?

  Did that change your life?

• 52:08Speaker 00

  Well, it allowed me to think you could make a living writing books. And it validated my feeling that the way in which I wanted to write books had an audience. So I was on, I didn't know, I had a particular way that I wanted to write books, but I didn't know whether anyone else liked it, shared my approach. So that book made me think, oh, okay, there's a, there's a universe of people out there who, who are into this kind of thing. And that was, that was, again, freeing, you know? At each stage in my career, I've been lucky enough to go through experiences that allow me to shed various anxieties. The Washington Post sheds anxiety about writing.

• 52:52Speaker 00

  Tipping Point sheds anxiety about whether the kind of writing I want to do has an audience. Those are two enormously freeing things.

• 53:01Steven Bartlett?

  What was the way that you wanted to write that you were unsure if the public would receive?

• 53:06Speaker 00

  I wanted to jump around, go on lots of digressions. I wanted to use, I wanted to make ideas as, make adventure stories around ideas, not about necessarily around people or narratives. I wanted to kind of ransack the academic world for really interesting insights and apply them to kind of everyday stories. I wanted to kind of like, it's that idea of like, making a book that is a jumble of different genres, right? So in the course of reading a chapter, you should entertain a new idea,

• 53:47Speaker 00

  meet an interesting person, have something that you believe challenged. It should be fine to have all those components in one chapter of a book. And the next chapter, it should be fine to move on to something completely different. That was what I wanted to do. I wanted to jump around.

• 54:03Steven Bartlett?

  All the success you've had as a writer has resulted in you now being, doing a lot of public speaking? One of the things when I was reading about your sort of philosophy towards public speaking that surprised me was that you say you don't try and start a public talk with a wow, with a wow moment. I think the quote was that never starts his talks with a wow moment or anything to hook them in, but instead tries to draw them in slowly. And this surprised me because I've always thought that the opposite approach was better. As in like when you walk on stage, people are typically on their phones, whatever, and you don't have their attention. So trying to get them to pay attention within the first 10 seconds by saying something that is somewhat, I don't know, provocative was a better approach. So I was keen to hear why you take that stance.

• 54:49Speaker 00

  The question is, what do you want your audience? And in this sense, it's no different from writing. What is the experience you want your audience to go through? You have them for whatever, 45 minutes, an hour. And I want them to feel that they have progressed. I don't necessarily want them to agree with everything I said or think I'm wonderful. That's not important. I want them to be in a different place than they were at the beginning. So to have thought about something that they hadn't thought about, to have moved their position on something a little bit, to be emotionally in a different place. So if they started out one way, I want them to be something, somewhere else.

• 55:32Speaker 00

  If they started out distracted, I'd love them to end up being focused. I just want movement, right? So my worry is, when you start with a bang, is you compromise the movement. So if, for example, I'm, I want them to be amused, their journey to be, a journey towards amusement. If the first thing I do is tell them an incredibly funny joke, the journey's over. Right? It's about time. So.

• 56:01Speaker 00

  The central problem of these speeches is that they've committed, like I say, forty five minutes to an hour. That's a long time and everything has to be about that. You have to think about that timeframe. You're telling a story within a sixty minute window, right? And they're going to judge you by how they feel in the sixtieth minute, not how they feel in the minute one.

• 56:28Speaker 00

  Movies, you know, the movie that fails, you sit in a two hour movie and you're enthralled for the first ninety minutes and then it falls apart in the end. You leave unhappy. You have never, you have never given a movie recommendation where you said the following. You should totally go and see that movie. The first hour is amazing. Now, I will warn you, the second hour is terrible. You never do that, right? You would actually, but you would say, oh, you should totally see it. It'll be, it'll start a little slow and you'll wonder why you're there. But wow, the last hour, that you would say. I've described to you this, you know, from a logical perspective, the same experience, fifty percent good, fifty percent bad.

• 57:14Speaker 00

  But all I've done is if by, by putting the bad first and the good second, I've made it something you recommend. And by reversing it, I've made it something that you would never tell a friend to do.

• 57:25Steven Bartlett?

  I actually talk, talk a lot about to my team about how people remember this, the peak and the end of an experience and all the like psychology tests they do. And big tech companies use this as a way to create a more memorable recollection of any of their sort of customer experiences. And also the studies they've done on whether if someone misses the flight at the start of their holiday versus if they miss it at the end of the holiday, the recollection of the holiday is drastically different.

• 57:49Speaker 00

  Exactly.

• 57:50Steven Bartlett?

  They miss it at the end, it's fucking awful holiday there. So that makes sense. But my, I think my thing is, I wouldn't even have their attention at the peak of the experience, or the story, if I haven't held them at the start with some kind of promise. And we actually see this with like Mr. Beast, who's the biggest YouTuber in the world. Much of the reason he says he's successful and now he hundred million subscribers, fastest growing YouTuber over the last five years, is because he will, at the start of the video, and this is a little bit to do with algorithms, he will tell you the promise he's making you that you're going to get at the end. So he'll do something in the end like. He'll basically create the plot in the first 10 seconds and go, in this video, I buy a million iPhones and then I text them all at the same time.

• 58:34Steven Bartlett?

  And you're now waiting till the end to see the plot realized, I guess.

• 58:38Speaker 00

  Well, he's, he's promising to tell you a story.

• 58:40Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 58:41Speaker 00

  Right. So with most stories, if you go and see a, if you, if you pick up a mystery book, mystery story, it's the same thing. By virtue of being described as a mystery, it's making a promise. The promise is, I'm going to, you know, create some, I'm going to lead you to a dark place where you don't know where the solution is, and I'm going to give you the solution. So like that, yeah, he's, he's, when you, when you, when you make the contract with your audience and the contract says, I'm telling you a story, you can hold them without, you don't have to, you're not wowing them, but you are, you are binding them to you. If you can, if you're promising a story, then you deliver on that.

• 59:22Speaker 00

  Now, he's probably promised successfully come through so many times now that people believe him when he says, I'm going to tell you a story. They believe and they're, they're quite willing to sit and wait for the, for the, the, you know, the, the, the, the story to be completed.

• 59:41Steven Bartlett?

  He actually does say that. He says the, the second thing is you actually have to deliver the, the punchline of that story. Are you, are you an emotional person? Do you consider yourself to be an emotional person?

• 59:51Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 59:52Steven Bartlett?

  Does that, does that impact your, your writing and your storytelling and your, your authorship, if that's even a word?

• 1:00:01Speaker 00

  In my podcast, very much so, less so in my books, because audio is so much more emotional. So a lot of my Revigious History episodes, many of them are quite emotional. And they're the ones that I value the most, the ones, particularly the ones that kind of, this, in this season, for example, there's two episodes which one will almost certainly make the majority of those who listen cry.

• 1:00:35Speaker 00

  And that's something you can do in audio and that I think is a great accomplishment. Real tears, not kind of, you know, there are some people who kind of cheat their way to tears, manipulate their way to the audience, but well-earned tears.

• 1:00:55Speaker 00

  And that, I love that kind of storytelling where you can move someone so deeply that they will respond emotionally to what you're saying.

• 1:01:02Steven Bartlett?

  I saw a quote actually from you that said, "I cry, but I don't get mad. I cry, but I don't get angry." That was it.

• 1:01:08Speaker 00

  Yeah, I don't really get angry much. I'm not a, I don't come from, I don't come from a family that does anger. I don't sort of see the point. It never gets you what you want. It doesn't make sense rationally. It feels terrible emotionally. It just makes everything, everyone is worse off and unhappier after the angry episode than before. So it's like, remind me why this is some, I mean, if I have, I try to kind of squelch it whenever I have an impulse to do, and then I just find it goes away, the impulse.

• 1:01:45Steven Bartlett?

  When was the last time you cried?

• 1:01:49Speaker 00

  Oh, I don't know, two days ago.

• 1:01:51Steven Bartlett?

  Really?

• 1:01:54Speaker 00

  Yeah. I tend to cry most often when I'm by myself. I think about something that causes me to get emotional.

• 1:02:06Steven Bartlett?

  Is it typically in your writing, or is it, you think more?

• 1:02:09Speaker 00

  No, I'd be walking down the street and I would, I will, I will be pursuing a line of thought that will bring tears to my eyes.

• 1:02:19Steven Bartlett?

  Really?

• 1:02:21Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:02:23Steven Bartlett?

  Is that what happened two days ago? You're walking down the street and?

• 1:02:29Steven Bartlett?

  Are you able to share what that line of thought was?

• 1:02:31Speaker 00

  I was thinking about my father.

• 1:02:33Steven Bartlett?

  Right.

• 1:02:35Speaker 00

  I was with my daughter, taking her, she's ten months, she's in the little baby carrier. And I, uh, uh, my father never met, you know, he died before she was born. And, uh, I would dearly have loved for him to meet her. And they have a lot in common, I think, although it's hard to tell at ten months. But, um, it seems to my mind they have a lot in common. And I was just reflecting on how lovely it would have been for them to meet.

• 1:03:09Steven Bartlett?

  You're a person of faith, right?

• 1:03:11Speaker 00

  Hmm.

• 1:03:12Steven Bartlett?

  So you believe, are you, you're Christian, Christianity or?

• 1:03:17Speaker 00

  Yeah, that's the tradition of Griffin, yeah.

• 1:03:18Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, same. I grew up in Christianity. My, we were always in church growing up until I, until I was about eighteen years old. How has that impacted the way that you see the world and your, your work and your writing? And even that particular moment, because being of the Christian faith, I imagine that, I'm guessing here. So excuse me if the guess is wrong, but I imagine that your belief is that he is here. And he has matter.

• 1:03:50Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:03:53Speaker 00

  Yes, I do think that, uh, sorry, now I'm getting emotional.

• 1:04:01Speaker 00

  Yeah, I do believe that.

• 1:04:05Steven Bartlett?

  Why, why is that, um, why does that make you so emotional?

• 1:04:15Speaker 00

  It's very, I don't know, sorry.

• 1:04:21Speaker 00

  It's very difficult for me to talk with my father without.

• 1:04:35Speaker 00

  His loss was the saddest thing that ever happened to me.

• 1:04:45Speaker 00

  Sorry, I'll be fine.

• 1:04:48Steven Bartlett?

  It's in many respects, a very beautiful thing, what you're saying. In the sense of his,

• 1:04:55Steven Bartlett?

  the love you clearly have for the man.

• 1:05:01Steven Bartlett?

  I always feel particularly moved when people talk about their fathers. And I've talked about this on this podcast a lot because I am living with this kind of ongoing regret, ongoing forecast of regret that I'm going to regret. My father is not at a young age and we're not so close and we don't have a close relationship. And I can't seem to figure out why I don't do something about it. So when I hear stories like that, I think it's this really stark reminder to me that like,

• 1:05:30Steven Bartlett?

  parents don't live forever. And I'm living with that illusion that my parents are going to live forever. And I'm also forecasting the regret based on speaking to people like you, if that makes sense. I'm like, it's when people say, what do you regret? I think I say, I think I'm going to regret not,

• 1:05:47Steven Bartlett?

  not having a closer relationship with my parents when they're gone.

• 1:05:51Speaker 00

  Yeah. Well, one of the ways

• 1:05:56Speaker 00

  you realize that your

• 1:06:01Speaker 00

  grief is one of the ways you keep them alive.

• 1:06:08Speaker 00

  You know, the thing I feared the most when my father died was that,

• 1:06:14Speaker 00

  was that I would forget him. And

• 1:06:20Speaker 00

  my grief reminds me that I have not. So it's very, it's very valuable. It's,

• 1:06:28Speaker 00

  if I was, if I was not

• 1:06:32Speaker 00

  moved by the, by thinking about him, that would be a great tragedy in my mind.

• 1:06:38Steven Bartlett?

  But is there a cost to that grief?

• 1:06:44Speaker 00

  I don't think so. I mean, I think it's a kind of, like I said, it keeps him alive. And it reminds me.

• 1:06:59Speaker 00

  Somebody, a friend of mine, once wrote in a book about his own father that my father, he wrote the following line, "My father died 25 years ago. I know him better now than I ever did back then."

• 1:07:20Speaker 00

  Which I think is one of the most beautiful lines and true lines that I've ever read. And I, as time passes, I see that more and more true of my own father, that I feel I know him better now than I did when he was alive.

• 1:07:43Speaker 00

  And it's hard to explain why that's true, but I.

• 1:07:50Speaker 00

  But, and I feel like if I were to ask my father about how sad he was about dying, the knowledge that I know him better now than he did, than I did when he was alive, would make his, he would find that, that fact would make his passing easier in his own mind, if that makes sense. It's getting huffly convoluted. But I feel like it's one of the things that makes death of a loved one less tragic, is that you have an opportunity to get them, to know them better.

• 1:08:26Speaker 00

  I realize that's hard to, it's a very hard concept to explain. It's very difficult for me to, when I read that, it just seemed, it seemed so enormously resonant and true.

• 1:08:37Speaker 00

  That something about the opportunity to kind of reflect on them over an extended period of time, and to see them reflected in, you know, I mentioned my daughter, to see my father's reflection in her clarifies my father in my, in my mind, you know, that specific traits that are.

• 1:09:00Speaker 00

  That are popping up in her. Everything from the size and my father had an enormous head. My daughter has a truly enormous head. And I look at her head and I just think, that's him. That's, you know, like.

• 1:09:27Speaker 00

  We have wandered off into all manner of complex territory.

• 1:09:35Steven Bartlett?

  Tends to happen in this, in these conversations. But it's really interesting that, that expression because I was thinking about how I recently had someone I knew, I knew passed away. And the process that happens in, in the wake of their passing is you first, as you were perfectly saying, they're a fairly well-known person in this country. They trend number one and you, you see this outpouring of the impact they had on others. And you go, oh my God, it wasn't just me that felt that way about this person. But then their parents came here and sat on the sofa and we just compared notes about this individual. And you can start to see, as you kind of described it there, the patterns and oh yeah, no. And, and it's, it's almost like the investigation starts once they're gone.

• 1:10:12Speaker 00

  Yeah, yeah.

• 1:10:14Steven Bartlett?

  And so that's why that was that quote, particular quote was so resonant to me. On the topic of relationships, one of the things that I, in, in your book Blink, in the, in the first chapter, you talk about John, does it, John Gottman?

• 1:10:27Speaker 00

  Oh, yeah.

• 1:10:27Steven Bartlett?

  I read about John Gottman completely separately. I read about his, when I was trying to read about relationships and what ruins relationships. I read about this idea of contempt.

• 1:10:36Speaker 00

  As being them.

• 1:10:37Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah. I actually, when I talked about my show, that went up in down this country. In the show, I talk about Professor John Gottman. I talk about contempt and how that's this insidious little hard to see force in relationships. But you actually got to meet him. What did that teach you about relationships and, um, and the ones that are going to last and those that are going to probably fail?

• 1:10:59Speaker 00

  Well, you know, it's a kind of obvious but crucially important point, which is a reminder of how we're social animals. And casting someone out is the great sin, the great injury. Not being angry with someone, or anger is the wrong word. But Gottman is clear that anger is not a predictor of... The expression of anger is not a predictor of the failure of a relationship. The expression of contempt is. And he makes that crucial distinction that if I confront you over something that I'm unhappy about, I am...

• 1:11:42Speaker 00

  The implicit understanding is, I'm doing this because our relationship is of such importance to me that an injury needs to be addressed, right? Contempt is where you have given up on the relationship. Like, ah, what's the point, right? It doesn't matter. And that idea that it doesn't matter, whatever, blah, blah, blah, is worse than, I can't believe you did that. That's super interesting. And it made me kind of think a lot about what it... You know, if you're thinking about building organizations, structures, relationships, family, anything that keeps people engaged and happy over the long term.

• 1:12:27Speaker 00

  Understanding that distinction is crucial. It is not conflict that drives people away. It is neglect, right? And not every encounter has to be positive to be useful. And, you know, when I'm thinking about the team I work with on my podcast, Revisionist History, for example, you know, many of them are much younger than me, and there are things I can teach them. And I have a choice. Do I bring this up?

• 1:12:56Speaker 00

  Look, guys, we screwed up on this. This isn't good. Or I let it slide. My personality is such that I often would let things slide. And I was, no, no, no, that's wrong. And that's, I am, I am impairing our relationship by letting, I think I'm in a moment helping things just by letting my irritation not get the better of me. No, I'm impairing the relationship. When I say to them, this isn't good work, and here's how it can be better. I am affirming to them that they are part of my team. And when I just shrug and say, oh, whatever. Then they become superfluous, right? I have truly injured them in that moment.

• 1:13:37Speaker 00

  This idea that that's a lot of what effective management is, is is implicitly ensuring subordinates, that they belong, that you're, you're part of the team, even if that's manifested as in, in terms of approbation or conflict or what have you. And that neglect is the, is that neglect is the enemy. And this is true in families as well, right? Neglect is the enemy. The thing that you can't, we were talking earlier about, about benign neglect. Benign's the key word, right? Considered neglect is fine. But when you turn your back on a child,

• 1:14:20Speaker 00

  that's when, that's when you do harm. And, you know, none of us were talking about our parents turning their backs on us. They were watching from far and not doing anything. Totally different.

• 1:14:32Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 1:14:32Speaker 00

  Totally different.

• 1:14:33Steven Bartlett?

  It's actually completely changed my perspective on my, my own childhood because you're right. I always thought of them like it being a form of like bad parenting. But, but in fact, I, they loved me very much and they were there at a house and I was safe. And I had a, I had a, had a foundation to flourish in. Without that, if I wasn't out on the street, you know,

• 1:14:53Speaker 00

  Foraging for yourself.

• 1:14:54Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, foraging, yeah. Well, lovelessly, which I actually think would have been even worse than being hungry. Just being loveless, completely loveless. And love, again, even in my child, we weren't maybe an affectionate family. I still don't call my parents by mom and dad. I still call them by their first names.

• 1:15:07Speaker 00

  Oh, really?

• 1:15:07Steven Bartlett?

  But I knew, yeah, it's weird. It's very strange. It just, I think it started as a joke, my mom saying she felt old if we called her. Mum and she wanted to be our friends and it was just a joke that I was born into and never knew otherwise. So I call them by their first names, but I was still well aware that they loved me because it was, it was, it was actions. It was like trying to, you know, being there whenever I was at danger, those kinds of things that, um, as opposed to smothering. That's really interesting though, that idea. And it kind of does, it's, it's a bit of a narrative violation that by giving feedback and by being honest and constructive in your feedback, you're actually showing people that you, and even in a professional sense, that you, that

• 1:15:50Steven Bartlett?

  you care and that you are together on this.

• 1:15:53Speaker 00

  Yeah, you're not, you're, yeah, that they are necessary to the process, right? It's that feeling of, of, of, that they, if they feel they are necessary, then you have, you know, we've noticed this, I've started this little company, um, this audio company with my friend Jacob Weisberg called Pushkin, produces all of our podcasts and others. Um, and, you know, we've noticed that the people, like every small company, we have people who come and go. And the people who go are the ones who, this is an obvious observation, but it's an interesting one. The people who have tended to leave are the ones who are the most socially disconnected

• 1:16:33Speaker 00

  from the organization. So who came into the office the least or who were not, were based in another city and we hired them largely to do remote work or they have, they don't feel, it's very hard to feel necessary when you're physically disconnected. And, um, you know, as, as we face the battle that all organizations are facing now and getting people back into the office, that this people, it's really hard to explain this core psychological truth, which is, we want you to have a feeling of belonging and to feel necessary. We, and we want you to join our team. And if you're not here, it's really hard to do that. It's not

• 1:17:13Speaker 00

  in your best interest to work at home. I know it's a hassle to come to the office, but like, you know, if you work, if you're just sitting in your pajamas in your bedroom, is that the work life you want to live? Right? Don't you want to feel part of something? I mean, it just, I, I, I'm really getting very frustrated with the inability of people in positions of leadership to explain this effectively to their employees. That if we don't feel like we're part of something important, what's the point? It's not, you're not just doing this to get a pay, if it's just a paycheck, then it's like,

• 1:17:56Speaker 00

  then what have you reduced your life to, right? It has to be, I don't know, I, this really is getting me kind of, I was in, I was in Los Angeles a few weeks ago and I was pitching some idea to a studio, I went to two studios, I won't name them, both have these beautiful, gorgeous, fancy offices of the sort you only see in LA, right? Fantastic, you know, sun is shining, you go into the parking lot and there are no cars there and you go into these places where they normally would have 500 people and there are four. Now, they say it's because of COVID, it's not COVID, it's just they, they just, everyone's just decided they want to work at home.

• 1:18:37Speaker 00

  Like, this is a business that is in, they are in the business of forging an emotional connection through storytelling to an audience and they cannot even form an emotional connection to their own employees, right? What is going on here? This is nuts.

• 1:18:54Steven Bartlett?

  You're totally preaching to the choir, by the way, because I've had this, I've had this conversation with, with all of my companies and all of my teams and even the people in this room now that I've spoken to them about it, I wrote a letter and I said, listen, we believe in interpersonal connection, the value of it, this is why we've never done this podcast on Zoom, even in the pandemic.

• 1:19:11Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:19:12Steven Bartlett?

  Because I, because part of the reason I do it is because of this.

• 1:19:15Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:19:15Steven Bartlett?

  I'm not, I'm not doing it to publish an episode, I'm doing it because I like to meet someone and connect with them. If you take that away from it, I don't want to do the podcast. And it's the same with my work, like, we ran a company who was, that when we had 700 employees, we were notorious for company culture, for having this, where the office was like a community center, you know, everything happened there. And our employee base, again, as the BBC wrote, were on average about 21, 22 years old. The minute the pandemic comes around, for the first time ever, we see people quitting en masse because suddenly it's them doing. A to do list in the boxer shorts at home. And the only upside we're bringing them in their life, the only sort of remuneration we're giving them, other than, you know, the work is interesting, whatever, is pay.

• 1:19:59Steven Bartlett?

  It literally then becomes the pay we're giving versus the company down the road that are paying you to sit in your boxer shorts and do your to do list. So it became pay versus pay. And to be honest, there were other people that were willing to pay more. So we saw tons of people leave and I realized that central to the value that we bring to these people's lives is community and togetherness and connected. So I fully, fully believe in it. And I also think that, and this is a controversial thing to say, people don't typically know what's right for them. And I'm not saying this just in the context of work. I'm saying like, look at other areas of our life where we've sacrificed community for productivity or efficiency, where maybe we now sit at home and tap a glass screen to get our food and then swipe on a glass screen to get a date

• 1:20:42Steven Bartlett?

  and then click double tap photos. Like, that's probably what you would have chosen through convenience, but then the cost on happiness, which you don't get to see when you make that transaction. So I think I said to all my companies and even some of my foreign companies, like, the most important thing for me is to give you clarity on who we are, then you can decide where you work.

• 1:21:03Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:21:03Steven Bartlett?

  And the problem we've seen over the last couple of years is spineless virtue signaling scared CEOs, specifically that are in San Francisco, like the Facebooks and the Twitters, who all had to follow the same kind of leftist, do whatever you want, without realizing that company culture should be reverse engineered from your company's mission. And if, and when you think about your company's mission, the thing that will help you achieve your company's mission is connectivity, is employee retention, is a sense of community, is all the other things other than just pay. These are all, so when you think about it from that perspective, you think, in fact, bringing people together, giving them freedom. I mean, don't like, they can still have as much freedom as they like to decide the days and what, you know, they've got to have freedom because that's also connected to them fulfilling the mission.

• 1:21:45Steven Bartlett?

  But saying that we are a group of people that get together because we believe in that, we believe in the value of it.

• 1:21:51Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:21:51Steven Bartlett?

  And every time I say this, you know, there's a big cohort that, yeah, amazing. And then, I mean, I was at an office this morning and it's exactly what you've described. They said there's usually 500 people in there. My team, where they're with me, empty. Empty, completely empty. I went to another office, a big ticketing company. They'd built, they'd started building, the construction of this building in central London during COVID. They've spent, what I believe, hundreds of millions on this office, completely empty. And I go, what's going on? They go, well, we're trying to get people back in. We do pizzas on Tuesday downstairs. People still don't come in.

• 1:22:25Steven Bartlett?

  Why don't you give them clarity? Why don't you say, this is who we are? Because they're scared. They're scared, they're scared to be clear. Do whatever you want. Decide whatever you want. That's not how teams work. Name, name a team that runs on that basis in sports. Do whatever you want. So I think, I believe, I have a hypothesis that we're going to return, not, not to where we were before, because I think that was somewhat broken as well. But I think we're going to return to a nice middle ground.

• 1:22:52Speaker 00

  Well.

• 1:22:53Steven Bartlett?

  Through them clarity.

• 1:22:54Speaker 00

  Sadly, if an economic recession will have that effect. I mean, if, when people start to get worried about their job, I think that might be easier to get them. It's sad that it's going to take a lot of pain. But yeah, I suspect that will bring, that will change the culture somewhat, the kind of climate.

• 1:23:17Steven Bartlett?

  I think it will be, and Jack is a good example here. Jack was freelance. So in the company I described with the great office culture, whatever, Jack used to come in as a freelancer. So he wasn't part of it. So he was one of the people sat at home in his boxer shorts, I'm guessing. And he was, he was part of the reason why, and this, I don't want to speak for Jack, but from what I understand, do correct me if I'm wrong, Jack. Is Jack wanted to move from that to, from being this freelancer to being full time in our team was because he saw that he was missing something. Jack, please correct me. Is that accurate?

• 1:23:47Speaker 02

  Yeah, that's right.

• 1:23:47Steven Bartlett?

  What were you miss, what did you?

• 1:23:49Speaker 02

  Well, I'd come to your offices and I'd see all this like being part of the team, which I haven't seen before. And yeah, I just realised that's what I've been missing from my work the whole time.

• 1:23:57Steven Bartlett?

  And so he was in the freelance sitting at home and then saw this group of young people that were all friends and played football and went out on Fridays and thought, you know what, that's actually as important as just getting a cheque, you know, so.

• 1:24:09Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:24:09Steven Bartlett?

  That's my hope of this. I'm actually going to start using our office culture as a way to employ people, which kind of bucks the trend that it's gonna sort of discentivize people to work here, so.

• 1:24:18Speaker 00

  Yeah. Oh, I mean, if it could have, it could have a really lovely thing where if you preferentially select people based on their desire to work in an office, that's a really wonderful way to kind of build a nice office culture, right?

• 1:24:34Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 1:24:35Speaker 00

  Just for the moment, you can just sort of cream skim all the people who.

• 1:24:40Steven Bartlett?

  Exactly.

• 1:24:40Speaker 00

  Blew this value in that.

• 1:24:41Steven Bartlett?

  What a party that would be. Those are the people I want to be with anyways, you know what I mean? So, yeah. Another thing that I found very curious was this idea that too much information when making decisions can sometimes distort reality and be unhelpful. Because, I mean, in most of the pursuits, in most of the businesses I run, the phrase is like, the more information, the better. And even when we're trying to figure things out, we're using, looking at the analytics, we're trying to get as much data as we possibly can to make our decisions. Now, now in Blink, you kind of contest that idea.

• 1:25:17Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:25:17Steven Bartlett?

  That sometimes less information is much.

• 1:25:20Speaker 00

  Well, particularly, you know, if these are unsupported decisions, so if you're going to be using decision-making tools, analytic, you know, advanced analytics, and you are confident in whatever algorithms you're using to kind of, then fine. But for the, for sort of much more human decision-making, you know, we have all kinds of problems. A classic one would be, you know, you, you want to buy a car and there are six things you're concerned about, and you, you fall into the default mode of, of weighing all six equally, when in fact, you know, price is probably five times more important than color of the car, you know, but you have, you sort of make the mistake of thinking,

• 1:26:05Speaker 00

  oh, I don't want to buy that one because it's the wrong shade of green, when it's, you know, far and away the, and that parallels with something that I, I didn't really understand until I started this company with, I've observed a kind of startup in operation with this company, Pushkin, which is.

• 1:26:24Speaker 00

  It's really, really hard for decision makers to focus on more than a handful of things. The idea that focus is a limiting variable in a lot of crucial decisions is something that I didn't, I understood it abstractly, but now I understand. You simply, the reason as a company you want to pick, you know, two lines of business, not five, is not that two lines make more rational business sense than five, but because you can't focus on five. You can't see you being, you only have a limited amount of, you have a limited amount of space in your head, right? And like, so that idea that we have a limited amount of space in our head.

• 1:27:05Speaker 00

  Obama, President Obama used to, every morning he would, he would have someone lay out his clothes for him so he didn't have to think about what clothes he was gonna wear. I know, on the theory that if you spend, if you devote space to what you're gonna wear that morning, you have less space for other stuff. He's absolutely right. Totally true. So we clutter. It's the idea that cluttering our decision-making process with extraneous information in the hopes that makes us better off in the end is a fool's game. Don't clutter. Like I said, if we're talking about unsupported decision-making. If you are, you know, IBM, sorting through some complex, fine.

• 1:27:48Speaker 00

  Or, but I mean, for everyday kind of stuff, that yeah, clear away, prioritize, be very clear about your priorities. Focus on what is crucial. That's the way to be a more efficient decision-maker in, in, in the kind of, in the, in these immediate unsupported domains.

• 1:28:09Steven Bartlett?

  I really need to do that with my wardrobe upstairs. Because I've just, I've got, I can hundreds of, I wear two of the black t-shirts and there's a hundred in that like, in that cupboard. But I could just take the others out. And I could, I could really, I just think about my life generally, how I live. It's kind of a cluttered, cluttered experience, which I think.

• 1:28:27Speaker 00

  My rule is every time I buy an item of clothing, I remove an item of clothing from my closet.

• 1:28:33Steven Bartlett?

  Oof.

• 1:28:34Speaker 00

  So I have homeostasis.

• 1:28:36Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 1:28:38Steven Bartlett?

  Slightly obscure topic, alcohol. Do you drink?

• 1:28:42Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 1:28:43Steven Bartlett?

  Because I I read about your, I've seen various sort of opinions you have on alcohol. And I assumed that would mean you you didn't. Why you, why, why, why are you laughing?

• 1:28:52Speaker 00

  Yeah, these are things I, which I love to kind of opine, half tongue in cheek. Wait, what? So, yes, what's your, what's your?

• 1:29:00Steven Bartlett?

  Well, the really interesting thing that I was, I was actually reading about just before you came was about how alcohol is such a situational thing. And how in, for, for many people, it's a depressant if they are sad alone. It can make them more anxious if they're anxious. And then at a football stadium, it can make them jubilant and feel connected and happy. What's your opinion on alcohol? Do you, do you think it's a, a bad thing for society? Do you think it should be banned?

• 1:29:27Speaker 00

  No, I mean, I'm, like I said, I do drink, not to excess, but um, uh, I think of it as, we're stuck with it in a good way. I mean, uh, we, I do think we have, we're relatively cavalier. I mean, this is a big theme in my book, Talking to Strangers. We had a whole chapter on alcohol and how a lot of what we talk about is, you know, we talk about a sexual, the culture of the problem of sexual assault, particularly among young people. It's really an alcohol problem that's driving it, right? There's very, very few cases of, of, you know, accepting violent rape. We talk about what we think of as sexual assault, where one party thinks it's consensual and the other party does not.

• 1:30:12Speaker 00

  That kind of, which are the problematic cases in many of, with young people.

• 1:30:19Speaker 00

  Someone's always, one or both parties are always drunk in those situations. It's very rare for that not to be the case. And understanding that, oh, if we want to tackle really, really serious things like sexual assault, we have to get our hands around drinking problems first and understand that something weird is happening in drinking, has happened in drinking culture in the last generation in the West, which is that the.

• 1:30:46Speaker 00

  The fringes have gotten more extreme. More young people abstain from alcohol than ever before. But at the other end of the continuum, what it means to be a heavy drinker today is very different from what it meant to be a heavy drinker 50 years ago. Heavy, there is more binge consumption and overconsumption of alcohol at the fringe today than there was in the past among young people. That's really problematic. And trying to understand how to reintroduce a culture of, not necessarily sobriety, but of balance in moderation in alcohol consumption

• 1:31:29Speaker 00

  is one of the, I think, one of the central tasks facing society today.

• 1:31:34Steven Bartlett?

  Why is that the case? Why is there more binge binge drinking on one end?

• 1:31:37Speaker 00

  We don't really have a good understanding of why. Part of it is, I think that norms around female drink, I talked about this in talking to strangers, norms around female alcoholic consumption have changed very dramatically. So 50 years ago, if a man and a woman go out on a date, there is zero expectation. In fact, they would be a, it would be considered problematic if the woman drank as much as the man. Now, there is, in many situations, particularly in colleges, universities, there is an expectation that the woman will match a man drink for drink. And that is so incredibly problematic for a whole series of physiological reasons.

• 1:32:22Speaker 00

  Not just that women, not just, by the way, that women are, tend to be, have a lot, weigh a lot less than men. It's not just about weight. It is that women process alcohol in a fundamentally different way than men. So two, a man and a woman who weigh exactly the same amount can have exactly the same amount to drink and the woman will be a lot more inebriated at the end of that process. That is a physiological fact about men and women. So if you have as a norm that women should match men drink for drink, you are asking for trouble. And our failure to talk frankly about alcohol abuse among young people, I just think is criminal. It's just like, it's a, I feel the same thing about, in some sense, about cannabis, where

• 1:33:08Speaker 00

  I don't have a problem with people smoking dope. But the idea that we can have THC levels in cannabis that are north of 25 or 30% is insane. Are you kidding me? It was at 1% a generation ago. And people are smoking the same amount and it's 25 times as, I mean, it's just like nuts. Like, why do we suspend the laws of biology when it comes to, to mind altering substances? It's just, it drives me nuts. Yes, money is the reason, but anyway.

• 1:33:42Steven Bartlett?

  Another time.

• 1:33:43Speaker 00

  Another time.

• 1:33:44Steven Bartlett?

  So we have a closing tradition on this podcast where the last guest leaves a question for the next guest, not knowing who they're leaving it for.

• 1:33:51Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:33:51Steven Bartlett?

  And so it means that all of our guests are kind of speaking to each other, I guess. This guest has asked the question.

• 1:33:59Steven Bartlett?

  What is one thing you regret not saying to somebody and why didn't you say it?

• 1:34:04Speaker 00

  Oh, wow. What is one thing? I mean, the, the obvious answer everyone's going to give is I didn't say I love you to some loved one. So I'll skip the obvious answer and try and do something less obvious. I think it would be, this is not a cop out. There's a, there is a, a genre of politeness that I have neglected. And that is people doing everyday things at a lower, the person who being kind, kinder and more appreciative of the person, of the janitor who sweeps the floor in the office you work in,

• 1:34:43Speaker 00

  or the, the woman who cleans your hotel room, or the, you know, I could make a long list of the nurse who picks up after, you know, you in the hospital or that. Those kinds of people doing thankless things, I have been, I believe, I would be, I regret that I have not, over the course of my life, been more obviously thankful to them.

• 1:35:12Steven Bartlett?

  Why?

• 1:35:14Steven Bartlett?

  Why that? Why did that? I mean, I agree, but what's made you realise that now?

• 1:35:21Speaker 00

  Uh. Well, my mom was in the hospital. She's out now. A few weeks ago and I just realised, wow, like, I don't know, it's just something about that.

• 1:35:35Speaker 00

  It's obvious, but it's not obvious. It's just like here are people

• 1:35:41Speaker 00

  doing, you know, very elemental things.

• 1:35:45Speaker 00

  Caring for people who are,

• 1:35:48Speaker 00

  you know, in that moment helpless, not getting paid an awful lot of money, working really, really long

• 1:35:54Speaker 00

  shifts, just went through an experience where they were risking their lives by going to the hospital for a couple of years. I mean, it's like what we ask these, what we put these people through? And the idea that we would take them for granted seems that I have taken them for granted seems to me

• 1:36:12Speaker 00

  outrageous. So maybe that's why.

• 1:36:16Steven Bartlett?

  Malcolm, thank you so much for being so generous with your time and thank you for the conversation. You're a very special person, very, very important thinker for very many reasons. I love the way, there's so many observations I've had from since speaking to you. One of them is that you really listen, which is strange because often I sit here with podcast guests and it's the whole like listening to speak thing. But for some reason, when I speak, you listen. And it sounds like a strange thing to say, but that is really, really surprising because you're very, very, very smart. And maybe that's your dad. Maybe that's the, because that's what I saw in it. It's like, that's what you described of your dad was that humility almost. So that's incredibly surprising, but then the way that you think and how considered nuance in your admittance that you could probably be wrong, which you said many, many times, I think is also incredibly refreshing. But, but it's also why your books are so great and it's why your podcast is so great.

• 1:37:01Steven Bartlett?

  It's why I would recommend everybody to go and check out The Bomba Mafia because there's a certain curiosity and wonder and beauty to the way that you write and the reason why you're writing that is very rare and I hope to one day emulate in my own writing. So thank you for all of the inspiration and thank you for doing this. Your podcast, you're in season seven now?

• 1:37:20Speaker 00

  Season seven of Revisionist History, yeah.

• 1:37:22Steven Bartlett?

  And that's coming to a close? You've got, is it two episodes?

• 1:37:25Speaker 00

  We're in the middle, we're in the middle of it, yeah, season, yeah.

• 1:37:28Steven Bartlett?

  And people can get that everywhere. So Spotify, Apple, everywhere.

• 1:37:30Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:37:31Steven Bartlett?

  Amazing. Thank you so much Malcolm for your time. Thank you. You're very welcome. Thank you.