Pod Insights The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway How America Became a Loophole Economy About this episode We’re back with another episode of The Week, a new weekly show from Prof G Media, hosted by George Hahn.
Every Friday, we’ll break down the biggest stories shaping business, technology, politics, and culture — and connect the dots across the conversations happening throughout the Prof G universe.
This week, George Hahn unpacks what happens when rules stop applying equally. We discuss presidential stock trades, political accountability, wealth taxes, China’s shifting leverage over America, and why wars cost more than governments admit.
We’d love your feedback as we build this show. Let us know what you think at [email protected] .
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript 3,475 words · 17 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 Speaker 00 Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bull spend, and marketers are calling it out in. Dashboard Confessions.
0:09 Speaker 01 My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.
0:17 Speaker 00 Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.
0:31 Speaker 02 This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior-like beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit MichelobUltra.com/SuperiorAccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.
1:01 Speaker 03 This episode is brought to you by Welch's Fruit Snacks. Back to school season can be tough on parents. But choosing a snack you and your kids can both get behind doesn't have to be. Stock up on Welch's Fruit Snacks. Made with whole fruit, and now made with no artificial dyes. It's a snack kids already love, and one you can feel good about giving them. Go back to school with Welch's Fruit Snacks. Now made with no artificial dyes.
1:31 George Hahn? Welcome to the Week from Prof G Media, where we break down what mattered and what it all means. I'm George Hahn, and it's Friday, May 22. This week, we talked a lot about rules. Rules around war, rules around markets, rules around political power, and what happens when people making decisions stop following them. Let's get into it.
1:56 George Hahn? On Wednesday's Prof G Markets episode, Ed sat down with Anthony Scaramucci, former White House Communications Director and founder of Skybridge Capital, to go through the 3,700-plus stock trades the president made in the first quarter of 2026. That's more than 40 trades a day, altogether valued somewhere between 220 million and 750 million dollars. And as Ed laid it out, a lot of those trades weren't random.
2:30 Ed Elson? January 6th, he buys up to a million dollars worth of Nvidia stock. And then January 14th, just a few days later, he approves Nvidia to start selling chips to China. That, to me, is like, OK, that's a very big deal. Similar thing happens. January 12th, he buys a bunch of Oracle stock. A week later, the deal for Oracle to buy a stake in TikTok is finalized. And of course, the only reason it's finalized is because he approves it. His administration approves it. Similar thing with Boeing. He buys Boeing stock, and then he says that China is going to purchase all these Boeing jets. Like, there are several examples here where it seems very, very plainly obvious that he had very important, material, non-public information. And this is just the way that the law talks about it.
3:15 Ed Elson? And then before that happens, he goes in and he buys the stock. And so in those cases, to me, I'm thinking, that's just illegal.
3:22 Speaker 06 You know, I guess there's three things I want to say. Number one, it's disgusting. It's probably legal, Ed. That's the irony of the whole thing. They've created these loopholes for themselves. But it's absolutely disgusting, and it makes people very cynical and very turned off by politics. Number two, I think this is probably the most important thing about it is he doesn't care, which means that worse things are on the way. You're going to see a tsunami of corruptive activity over the next two and a half years, and it's going to be put right in your face. The bottom line is, this is going to happen. Okay, the bottom line is for your viewers and listeners, life is unfair.
4:07 Speaker 06 And these guys are sitting there ladling money into their own accounts for their own self-interest. And it would be hypocritical of me, Ed, if I just went after the president on this. You have to go after the Democrats that are also doing this. This is a bipartisan thing. Now, you can say, and this almost makes me laugh about Trump, and if Galloway was on with us right now, he would laugh at this, because I know the son of a bitch. Prof G would be like, yeah, no, he's right. Trump is doing it to the 29th power compared to these guys. Okay, so if Pelosi's taken 5 million, Trump's taken 500 million.
4:47 Speaker 06 And so all he's done is pumped himself with unethical steroids. He took the unethical steroid needle, he pumped it into his biceps, and he's out there making billions of dollars for himself. But they're all doing it, Ed. Yes. And I think it would be remiss of us to pretend that it's not happening on both sides.
5:06 George Hahn? And these trades were just one story. On Raging Moderates, Scott and Jess discussed another controversy. The DOJ announced a new $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund, created to compensate people who say they were politically targeted by the government. The money comes from a settlement tied to Trump's lawsuit over the 2019 leak of his tax returns. Under the program, a commission appointed by the Attorney General decides who gets paid. Those decisions can't be challenged in court, and the government isn't required to publicly disclose where all of the money goes.
5:49 George Hahn? Critics argue it rewards loyalty, while supporters argue it corrects abuses. Scott saw something bigger.
6:01 Scott Galloway? File the suit against the IRS or someone at the IRS for leaking his tax documents. He was the first president to not voluntarily release his documents, his tax filings, and then sue his own administration and then decide to settle the case brought by him. I mean, this is just, it's so circular and weird and it's such blatant corruption that I think Putin is just in total awe and admiration of this guy right now. And the notion that they tried to soft pedal it a bit by saying it's a compensation fund. It's a slush fund for him to do what any good autocrat does, and that is reward his allies and punish his enemies.
6:46 Scott Galloway? And this gives him $1.8 billion to go dole out money to people who are willing to commit crimes in support of him. It also creates a real atmosphere of danger around 2026 and 2028 because there's got to be a general feeling that people think if I show up to a polling booth and start harassing people in democratically strongholds, if I show up to the inauguration and refuse to swear in a Democrat if a Democrat wins and I commit crimes and I create a series of intimidating actions, criminality, that the president will save me and bail me out because he's now got a $1.8 billion fund to even reward me.
7:29 Scott Galloway? I mean, we're not only talking about pardons for these people, we're talking about giving them money.
7:34 George Hahn? But frustration with the rules extends well beyond Washington. This week, California put on the ballot a one-time 5% wealth tax on assets over $1 billion. The debate on Tuesday's markets episode with Jason Calacanis and Bradley Tusk got to the core of why people are angry and why the proposed fix might not work.
7:59 Speaker 08 If you are a poor person, right? And you need public housing, you need Medicaid, you need food stamps. You don't care about social justice. You care about the money being there in the budget to provide you with these things. So if California, which I believe it would at the law, at the conclusion of if they do an access tax, or New York right now, has less money to be able to help the poor, then you're not solving for the problem of inequality. You might be solving to make people who are upper middle class and highly progressive feel better emotionally because they feel like now the people who did better than them are being justly punished. I don't care about their emotional state or needs. I care about helping poor people.
8:39 George Hahn? And if the conversation this week was partly about institutions weakening at home, China Decode asked whether America is losing leverage abroad, too. James King argued something remarkable happened during the Trump-G summit last week. For perhaps the first time, China looked like it had the upper hand, not because America suddenly got weaker, but because leverage shifted.
9:05 Speaker 09 The potentially game-changing outcome was that the US and China are now trying to work together to put into place what China calls a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability. I know that's a bit of a mouthful, but to me, that means they're trying to climb down from a situation in which China and the US are constantly adversarial in their relationship and moving towards a much more stable relationship. And I think one of the pointers towards this is that Trump invited Xi Jinping to visit the US in September this year, and Xi Jinping has agreed to go.
9:48 Speaker 09 So there's a measure of continuity there. I think quite a lot of people will be, will be wondering whether or not this really was a historic summit. And in the sense that I reckon China had the upper hand, I think you can see that from the fact that Trump was trying to be as friendly as possible. He said to Xi Jinping, you are a great leader. He said, it's an honor to be with you. It's an honor to be your friend. The relationship between China and the US is going to be better than ever before. And I think one piece of his central background has changed a lot in the way these two countries
10:28 Speaker 09 see each other, and that is China's enduring chokehold over rare earth and critical minerals supplies.
10:39 George Hahn? We'll be right back after the break.
10:46 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Bilt. Most of us work hard to earn our keep, but usually there's no one around to hand you a cookie when you successfully pay your monthly housing bill. No one except Bilt, that is. Bilt has expanded from their original rental rewards program, and they have a lot more going on for members now. For example, members can earn points on mortgage payments, too. Every housing payment gets you points that get you a lot more than baked goods, such as flights with top travel partners, including United and Hyatt, Lyft rides, Amazon.com purchases, and much, much more. Here's another benefit of Bilt membership. You also get access to what they call a neighborhood concierge. You can make restaurant reservations, book fitness classes, and find new local spots, all while rewarding you at more than 45,000 merchant partners. It's simple.
11:29 Scott Galloway? Being a renter and now owning a home feels a lot better with Bilt. You can download the Bilt app and join the membership for where you live at joinbilt.com/propg. That's J-O-I-N-B-I-L-T.com/propg. Use our link so they know we sent you.
11:47 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Upwork. Trying to scale your business? At some point, you're probably going to hit a point where you need some help. Sometimes the best way to break through that is bringing in the right talent at the right time. Upwork can help. Upwork is a one-stop platform where you can find, hire, and pay expert freelancers across more than 125 categories. Whether you need specialized skills for a single project or extra support to keep up with demand, it's easy to connect with experienced professionals, review their work, and find the right fit. You can move faster without taking on the commitment of full-time hires. And for businesses that need the very best talent, Upwork Business Plus provides access to the top 1% of freelancers on the platform. AI-powered matching connects you with qualified candidates in under six hours, cutting down the time spent searching.
12:30 Scott Galloway? Upwork also takes care of contracts, payments, and other administrative tasks, so you can spend less time managing logistics and more time focused on what's next. Visit upwork.com/profg right now and post your job for free. That's upwork.com/profg to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's U P W O R K dot com slash prof G. Upwork.com slash prof G.
12:57 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Vanta. As AI adoption grows, so does your company's security risks and requirements. New frameworks, audits, and vendors keep piling on, but your team isn't getting any bigger. Most compliance tools promise automation, but you're really stuck doing all the work by hand, chasing screenshots, validating controls, and playing catch-up when audit season comes around again. Vanta works differently. The regentic trust platform is built to scale with you, not slow you down. With over 1,400 automated tests across 400-plus integrations, Vanta collects evidence and monitors your controls year-round, cutting your audit prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the Vanta agent everywhere you work, whether your team is in Vanta every day or living in tools including Claude or Cursor. Want proof?
13:42 Scott Galloway? Over 16,000 fast-growing companies like Ramp, Ryder, and Harvey save time and resources while scaling fast with Vanta. Learn more at vanta.com/profg and get $1,000 off. That's spelled V A N T A dot com slash prof G for $1,000 off.
14:07 George Hahn? Welcome back. The conversation eventually landed somewhere where rules matter most: war.
14:15 George Hahn? On Prof G Conversations, Scott sat down with David French, Iraq veteran, constitutional lawyer, and columnist at The New York Times. They discussed Iran and one basic question: Who decides when America goes to war? David argues constitutional guardrails aren't technicalities. They exist because democracies work best when institutions hold.
14:41 Speaker 11 Well, the Iran war is a really good example of why the law matters so much. So, under traditional just war doctrine, you're not supposed to be able to go to war. You should not go to war under the old-school just war doctrine unless you're going to war under the command of the lawful sovereign for a just reason and to pursue just ends. Has that happened here in the United States? And the answer is no, because American law requires for the declaration of war that that's a role reserved to Congress. So, that doesn't mean that a president can't respond immediately when there is an attack on our forces, or there's an emerging, urgent, immediate situation that requires military force.
15:26 Speaker 11 But even in those circumstances, the president is supposed to go to Congress immediately to get ratification and support of his actions. It is actually very important to the ability of the United States to wage war and to wage war effectively. Because if there's one thing that we know from history, it's that democracies that have achieved public support for a war are among the most powerful entities we've seen in the world. So even if you thought it was wise to attack Iran, for example, the fact that we didn't do the constitutional process undermines the entire war.
16:02 George Hahn? But constitutional process isn't the only thing wars test. They test budgets, institutions, and our ability to honestly account for trade-offs. On a recent Prof G Plus deep dive, Scott explored how much war actually costs. Last month, the Pentagon said the war in Iran had cost $25 billion. That number has since been updated to $29 billion. But economists argue that number captures only the narrowest slice of the bill: missiles fired, aircraft deployed, equipment destroyed.
16:45 George Hahn? The harder costs often come later. Maintaining troops in the region, higher oil prices, inflation, veteran care, and long-term economic consequences that outlast headlines and administrations. History suggests governments consistently underestimate those costs. Economist Justin Wolfers discussed that on a Prof G Plus deep dive this week.
17:10 Speaker 12 Either there is, or damn it, there should be. Someone inside the White House or inside the Treasury saying, Mr. President, bombing Iran upends the global economy. It upends the American economy and it will affect people's lives in the following ways.
17:25 George Hahn? Mm hmm.
17:26 Speaker 12 Um, that's a far broader question. Either they're not asking that because this has not been a carefully thought through war, or they know the answer to that and they're keeping it secret. But what I do know is the other group of folks who are trying to price this thing are folks on Wall Street. They're figuring out not the full cost of war, but they're figuring out, you know, what do my new GDP forecasts look like? What do my oil price forecasts look like? Employment forecasts and so on. And no matter which way you slice it, Wall Street is saying that the true number is at least 10 times larger than the Pentagon's saying.
17:59 George Hahn? See.
18:00 Speaker 12 But there's an even deeper problem here, Scott. You said, why do we always tend to lowball? And the answer is that's the nature of war. I might try and fight you. Well, I might meet you in a, a dark street outside a London pub. And you might say, hey, Justin, do you want to fight? And most days of the week, I'm like, no, Scott's taller than me. I'm not going to. The only times on which I'm going to say, yes, Scott, I am, and then take a swing is when I underestimate the possibility that this is going to be expensive.
18:28 George Hahn? Mm hmm.
18:29 Speaker 12 So it's in the very nature of conflict that I decide to have a swing at you because I think you're not that big of a bloke and I'm big and tough and strong. And you swing back because you make the exact same mistake. Look, any fight, whether it's a fight with your spouse, a fight down a darkened alley, a war, or your workers striking, you're usually better off not having a fight. You're saying at the end of this fight, something's going to happen. The fight's messy and awful and hurts me and it hurts you. Let's not have the fight. Let's get to that negotiated outcome.
19:01 Speaker 12 All conflict is waste. And so the only way that conflict ever occurs is we fail to negotiate, or alternatively, we think we're mistaken by how easy it is to win.
19:11 George Hahn? By the way, if you want to hear that full conversation with Justin Wolfers, it's available exclusively on Substack. And before we wrap up, a quick victory lap. Scott correctly predicted that Elon Musk's lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI was going nowhere. Musk, bruised ego, deep pockets, army of lawyers, spent years trying to undo his biggest regret, leaving OpenAI and watching Altman turn it into one of the most valuable companies on earth. He sued for $150 billion. He wanted Altman removed. Here's what Scott said on CNN's Smirconish.
19:56 Scott Galloway? From a legal standpoint, courts like argument and evidence, not regret and indignance. From a legal standpoint, this is Marvus Frazier versus Mike Tyson. This should be over in 30 seconds of the first round. Musk has no leg to stand on here. And now he wants to control the one piece of the internet on totally baseless legal grounds that he should own it. What could go wrong? This should and will be a knockout in the first round.
20:30 George Hahn? We'll be back next Friday with a fresh edition of the Week from Prof G Media, breaking down what mattered and what it all means. Until then, we'll see you around the Prof G Universe.
20:53 Speaker 13 Now at Kroger, your points add up to more ways to save every trip. Use them your way to take dollars off groceries at checkout or save at the pump. You can even save up to $35 on your next fill-up. Same points, more choices. And with low prices on fresh, quality food, plus digital and personalized offers tailored to how you shop, your dollar goes further. Redeem your points online or in the app. Kroger, fresh for everyone. Restrictions apply. See site or store for details.
21:24 Speaker 14 Booking.com is the easiest way. From a day surrounded by noise...
21:37 Speaker 14 ...to a stay... ...surrounded by nature.
21:44 Speaker 14 That's nice. Go on, book it. It's easy. Booking.com. Booking dot... yeah.
21:54 Speaker 15 Close your eyes. Exhale. Feel your body relax. And let go of whatever you're carrying today.
22:01 Speaker 16 Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast!
22:09 Speaker 15 And breathe.
22:11 Speaker 16 Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order! Oh, sorry. Namaste?
22:18 Speaker 15 Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-CONTACTS.
Previous Why Trump's Iran Strikes Are Unconstitutional — with David French Next No Mercy / No Malice: Art of the Sellout Page updated September 28, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
