The Curiosity Shop with Brené Brown and Adam Grant
Hosted by Adam Grant and Brené Brown
Written by a model from the transcript; not yet reviewed.
This episode explores the rise of normalized cheating in high-pressure academic and professional environments, prompted by an op-ed written after students engineered a custom large language model to ace a closed-book exam. The hosts examine why students increasingly view cheating as a creative problem-solving tactic rather than a moral failure, contrasting the pursuit of external success by any means necessary with internal integrity. They discuss the limits of external proctoring and explore research showing how activating a moral identity through personal self-concept helps individuals resist the temptation to cut corners.
The episode opens with a series of commercial spots before the hosts introduce themselves and set the stage for the conversation.
Brené and Adam discuss their recent intensive MBA courses and the potential saturation of such programs.
Adam explains the motivation behind his op‑ed, detailing a recent cheating incident involving AI and students.
Adam describes how he altered the exam format and used an essay prompt to confront students about cheating.
The students’ essays reveal a lack of integrity, prompting a discussion on moral identity and the role of shame versus guilt.
The hosts debate whether AI use is inherently cheating and explore how to teach integrity without relying on proctoring.
They review research on honor codes, pledges, and moral identity activation, highlighting what works and what backfires.
The conversation turns to trust frameworks like BRAVING and how integrity shapes workplace culture and personal character.
Exploring the definition of integrity as actively living values rather than merely professing them.
Discussing how homes, schools, and workplaces can nurture a stable sense of moral identity through reflection and behavior mapping.
Using everyday scenarios to illustrate how honesty is practiced repeatedly and the internal struggle it creates.
Examining the emotional difference between telling small lies and feeling guilt, and how this informs integrity decisions.
Discovering student cheating via custom LLMstory
The guest describes discovering that students had ingested all course materials into a custom large language model to use on a take-home exam.
Students rationalizing cheating as survivalinsight
Instead of expressing guilt, the majority of students defended cheating as a necessary performance-enhancing tactic in a broken, high-pressure system.
The failure of traditional proctoring solutionsstrategy
The hosts argue that returning to blue books and heavy proctoring is unfeasible and fails to address the root issue of trust.
Moral identity as a shield against cheatingdata
Data shows that people with strong moral identities do not increase their cheating when stakes go up, driven by a desire to be good.
The physical feeling of cognitive dissonanceinsight
The host explains that acting outside of one's core values triggers sickening cognitive dissonance and adaptive guilt rather than shame.
The backfiring effect of honesty pledgesdata
An experiment revealed that asking students to sign an honesty pledge before an exam actually doubled the rate of cheating.
Moral identity versus moral imageinsight
The guest explains that moral image makes people vulnerable to peer pressure, while moral identity relies entirely on personal self-concept.
“And what they explained to me was that they had built a custom large language model where they ingested all of the course materials, the readings, the PowerPoints, the notes they took.”
“And I feel like I went through the five stages of grief in five minutes there because, Brene, these were students I spent the whole fall trying to do everything I could to support and help.”
“All right, well, the students who said cheating is wrong were in the minority.”
“And the answer that came out again and again in the data is identity.”
“The heart of integrity is recognizing that the ends don't justify the means.”
“integrity is actively practicing your values, not just professing them, and doing what's right, not what's fun, fast or easy.”
“I think a lot of people make the mistake of conflating moral identity with moral image.”
“Moral identity has got to be about your self‑concept. It has to be about, I don't want to see myself as a person who would do that.”
“Moral identity, not movable. And what's really interesting to me is, I think honesty is a discipline and a practice.”
What happens to integrity when cheating becomes easier and the world seems to reward people for cutting corners? In this episode of The Curiosity Shop, Adam shares what happened when he discovered that students were planning to use AI to cheat on an exam. Brené and Adam move into a much larger conversation about honesty, character, and moral identity. Together, they explore when using AI is inherently cheating, why monitoring people isn’t enough to make them trustworthy, the difference between shame and adaptive guilt, and what research reveals about building a stronger moral compass. They also unpack why honor codes can sometimes backfire, how inconsistent accountability undermines trust, and what dimension of character we often overlook. Ultimately, Brené and Adam explore the difference between wanting to be seen as a good person and choosing to become the kind of person who does the right thing even when no one else is watching. There’s Really Only One Way to Stop Students From Cheating – Adam Grant, August 26, 2026, The New York Times Cheating: Why Students Do It and How We Can Help Them Stop – Donald McCabe, 2001, American Educator Brené Brown: The Rage Bucket Theory – Trevor Noah, June 4, 2026, What Now? with Trevor Noah Adam Grant Gives Trevor an Intellectual Wedgie – Trevor Noah, August 2024, What Now? with Trevor Noah Pickleball Line Rules: Calling the Ball “In” or “Out” – PlayPickleball.com, July 31, 2024, YouTube Cheating in the Age of Generative AI: A High School Survey Study of Cheating Behaviors Before and After the Release of ChatGPT – Lee et al., 2024, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence Addressing Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Generative AI’s Impact – Sharma & Panja, 2025, Open Praxis As Schools Reconsider Cursive, Research Homes in on Handwriting’s Brain Benefits – Jonathan Lambert, May 11, 2024, NPR How Learning Handwriting Trains the Brain: The Science Behind the Cursive Wars – Mariana Lenharo, February 2, 2026, Nature The Importance of Cursive Handwriting Over Typewriting for Learning in the Classroom – Ose Askvik et al., 2020, Frontiers in Psychology Why Cursive Handwriting Is Good for Your Brain – Christopher Bergland, October 2, 2020, Psychology Today The Effects of Handwriting Experience on Functional Brain Development in Pre-Literate Children – James & Engelhardt, 2012, Trends in Neuroscience and Education How Handwriting Trains the Brain – Gwendolyn Bounds, October 5, 2010, The Wall Street Journal The Self-Importance of Moral Identity – Aquino & Reed, 2002, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior? A Meta-Analysis – Hertz & Krettenauer, 2016, Review of General Psychology Competition and Cheating: Investigating the Role of Moral Awareness, Moral Identity, and Moral Elevation – Vadera & Pathki, 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior – Tangney et al., 2007, Annual Review of Psychology Shame and Guilt – Tangney & Dearing, 2002, Guilford Press Shame, Guilt, and Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Review – Kim et al., 2011, Psychological Bulletin Shame v. Guilt – Brené Brown, January 14, 2013, brenebrown.com Protecting Our Attention, Time and Humanity in a World That Won’t Slow Down – Brené Brown, August 20, 2026, The Curiosity Shop with Brené Brown and Adam Grant Effectiveness of Ex Ante Honesty Oaths in Reducing Dishonesty Depends on Content – Zickfeld et al., 2025, Nature Human Behaviour Committed Dishonesty: A Systematic Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Social Commitment on Dishonest Behavior – Zickfeld et al., 2024, Psychological Bulletin Detecting and Preventing Cheating in Exams: Evidence From a Field Experiment – Cagala et al., 2024, Journal of Human Resources The Honor Committee – University of Virginia, honor.virginia.edu Effects of Honor Code Reminders on University Students’ Cheating in Unproctored Exams – Zhao et al., 2023, Contemporary Educational Psychology Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings – McCabe et al., 2002, Research in Higher Education Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences – McCabe & Treviño, 1993, Journal of Higher Education Bicentennial Analysis – UVA Honor Committee, 2019, University of Virginia Culture Is Not the Problem. Tolerated Behaviour Is. – John Amaechi, February 15, 2026, Giant! with John Amaechi Making a Pledge Can Encourage Honest Behavior—If the Wording Is Right – Simon Makin, Scientific American, February 26, 2025, Scientific American "Do or do not. There is no try” - Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back, Screenplay by Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan, 1980, [Video] YouTube I Solemnly Swear I’m Up to Good: A Megastudy Investigating the Effectiveness of Honesty Oaths on Curbing Dishonesty – Zickfeld et al., 2024, HAL Preprint Trump Reports Over $1 Billion in Income From Crypto Ventures – TIME, June 30, 2026, TIME Now Available: The President’s and Vice President’s Public Financial Disclosure Reports – U. S. Office of Government Ethics, 2026, U. S. Office of Government Ethics Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 – U. S. Congress, 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-105 This Is Your Brain on Drugs – Partnership for a Drug-Free America, 1987, YouTube Project D. A. R. E. Outcome Effectiveness Revisited – West & O’Neal, 2004, American Journal of Public Health New Approaches to Youth Substance Misuse – American Psychological Association, March 2024, Monitor on Psychology Beyond Pleasure and Pain – Higgins, 1997, American Psychologist Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect – Higgins, 1987, Psychological Review Possible Selves – Markus & Nurius, 1986, American Psychologist Unwanted Identities: A Key Variable in Shame–Anger Links and Gender Differences in Shame – Ferguson et al., 2000, Sex Roles Shame Resilience Theory: A Grounded Theory Study on Women and Shame – Brown, 2006, Families in Society The BRAVING Inventory – Brené Brown, brenebrown.com An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust – Mayer et al., 1995, Academy of Management Review The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments – Nisbett & Wilson, 1977, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Integrity Is Choosing Courage Over Comfort – Brené Brown, brenebrown.com The Self-Importance of Moral Identity – Aquino & Reed, 2002, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology The Optics of Lying: How Pursuing an Honest Social Image Shapes Dishonest Behavior – Guzikevits & Choshen-Hillel, 2022, Current Opinion in Psychology Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones – James Clear, 2018, Avery Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
10,518 words · 7 speakers
Speaker names marked are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
Page updated · transcript and summary are machine-generated