Chasing Russian, Chinese, & North Korean Spies | Glenn Chafetz | Ep. 344

Glenn Chafetz is the Director of 2430 Group, a non-profit, non-partisan institution that produces and disseminates research on state-sponsored espionage against the U. S. private sector. Glenn has more than 30 years experience in government, academia, and the private sector. He spent most of his career at CIA, where he served multiple overseas tours, including three as Chief of Station. He was also the Agency’s first Chief of Tradecraft and Operational Technology. Find Glenn here: ⬇️ https://www.2430group.org/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/glenn-chafetz-464bb318b ——————————————————————- New merch, patches, and stickers! ⬇️ https://theteamhouse-shop.fourthwall.com Support the show here:⬇️ https://www.patreon.com/TheTeamHouse ___________________________________________________ Subscribe to the new EYES ON podcast here:⬇️ https://www.youtube.com/@EyesOnGeopoliticsPod/featured —————————————————————- Today's Sponsors: Mando ⬇️ https://shopmando.com Promo code "TEAMHOUSE" for 40% off your starter pack. GhostBed⬇️ https://www.ghostbed.com/house FOR 10% off! ___________________________________ Jack Murphy's new book "We Defy: The Lost Chapters of Special Forces History" ⬇️ https://www.amazon.com/We-Defy-Chapters-Special-History-ebook/dp/B0DCGC1N1N/ —————————————————————— To help support the show and for all bonus content including: https://www.patreon.com/TheTeamHouse -AD FREE AUDIO -AD FREE VIDEO -Access to ALL bonus segments with our guests Subscribe to our Patreon! ⬇️ https://www.patreon.com/TheTeamHouse Or make a one time donation at: ⬇️ https://ko-fi.com/theteamhouse Social Media: ⬇️ The Team House Instagram: https://instagram.com/the.team.house?utm_medium=copy_link The Team House Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheTeamHousePod Jack’s Instagram: https://instagram.com/jackmcmurph?utm_medium=copy_link Jack’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/jackmurphyrgr?s=21 Dave’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/dave_parke?s=21 Team House Discord: ⬇️ https://discord.gg/wHFHYM6 SubReddit: ⬇️ https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTeamHouse/ Jack Murphy's memoir "Murphy's Law" can be found here:⬇️ https://www.amazon.com/Murphys-Law-Journey-Investigative-Journalist/dp/1501191241 The Team Room Reading Room (Amazon Affiliate links):⬇️ https://jackmurphywrites.com/the-team-room-reading-room/ Intro music by https://www.youtube.com/user/RemixSample "Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio" Want to sponsor the show? Email: ⬇️ [email protected] Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-team-house--5960890/support https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-team-house--5960890/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  She's been thinking about this sleepover all week, but I think about her food allergies all the time. Fortunately, her doctor prescribed Zolair, omalizumab. It's proven to significantly reduce allergic reactions if a food allergy accident happens.

• 0:13Speaker 01

  Zolir 150mg is a prescription medication used to treat food allergy in people one year of age and older to reduce allergic reactions due to accidental exposure to one or more foods. While taking Zolir, you should continue to avoid all foods to which you are allergic. Don't use if you are allergic to Zolir. Zolir may cause a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction called anaphylaxis. Tell your doctor if you ever had anaphylaxis. Get help right away if you have trouble breathing or if you have swelling of your throat or tongue. Zolir should not be used for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Zolir is for maintenance use to reduce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, while avoiding food allergens. Serious side effects such as cancer, fever, muscle aches and rash, parasitic infection, or heart and circulation problems have been reported. Please see zolir.com for full prescribing information. Ask an allergist about Zolir. This is an advertisement for Zolir

• 0:58Speaker 01

  paid for by Genentech and Novartis.

• 1:00Speaker 02

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of 5-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 1:28Speaker 03

  Hey guys, our show is sponsored by Ghostbed. Check them out, please. They make awesome mattresses, awesome pillows, awesome bedding. Ghostbed provides high-quality and super comfortable, award-winning mattresses crafted in the U.S. and Canada. Did you know that 60% of U.S. adults report being too hot when they're trying to sleep? That's me, I'm a sweaty little baby. That's why we design all of our products with cooling features so you stay comfortable and asleep all night long. Pair any of our mattresses with Ghostbed's award-winning adjustable base and get the ultimate sleep experience. Ghostbed rules the family-owned business, 60,000-plus 5-star reviews. They have sleep experts on staff with 20-plus years of experience. If you have any questions, you can

• 2:12Speaker 03

  hit them up and ask them, you know, maybe what kind of mattresses work for you. 20-plus-year warranty, that's two times the industry standard, free shipping and returns on mattresses. Most of the products ship out within 24 hours. They have in-house customer support and sleep experts chilling in Plantation, Florida. It rules. It's the best. They give you 101 nights, risk-free, to make sure that these beds are right for you. If you don't like it after 101 nights, you can send it back, full refund. When you purchase a Ghostbed mattress, your comfort guaranteed. I'm reading it right now, and it's capital letters, guaranteed. Okay? They do the right thing, and they're a great company. If you're not sure which Ghostbed's right for you, like I

• 2:57Speaker 03

  said before, you could take their mattress quiz online, or you can give a call to one of their sleep experts, and they'll help you with exactly what you possibly could need, what works for you and what doesn't. And the best news about this is Team House listeners and viewers, you get an extra 10% off sitewide for a limited time. You just go to ghostbed.com/house and use the code HOUSE at checkout. One more time, that's ghostbed.com/house with the code HOUSE, H-O-U-S-E, at checkout for an extra 10% off sitewide. I want to thank Ghostbed for their continued support. I want to thank all the fans that listen and watch for their continued support.

• 3:38Speaker 03

  Without you guys, we are nothing. So, thank you for supporting the show, and thank you for supporting the companies that help support the show. Ghostbed.com/house for 10% off. Made in the US, made in Canada. Shout out to our brothers in Canada. They rock. Check them out. I love Ghostbed. Thanks, guys.

• 3:59Speaker 03

  Special Operations.

• 4:04Speaker 03

  Covert Ops. Espionage. The Team House. With your hosts, Jack Murphy and David Park.

• 4:20Jack Murphy?

  Hey folks, this is episode 344 of The Team House. I'm Jack Murphy with our guest on the show today Glenn Shaffitz. Glenn had an incredible career going from college professor to State Department diplomat to CIA officer with eight tours overseas, three as Chief of Station, and then became the Chief of Tradecraft at CIA. And today works in the private sector, teaching corporations how to do counterintelligence against, we'll get into, foreign adversaries. So excited to talk to Glenn today about all this stuff. Before we jump into it, just a quick shout out our friends at Casa Caribe O Cigars. Please check them out at casacaribeo.com.

• 5:03Jack Murphy?

  A veteran known business that we're very happy to support whenever we can. Glenn, thanks for joining us and welcome to the show.

• 5:12Speaker 05

  Pleasure to be here, Jack.

• 5:14Jack Murphy?

  So take us from the top. Tell us a little bit about how you grew up and how that, you know, kind of began to take you towards a life of governmental service.

• 5:25Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a pretty simple story. When I was in college, I had to decide what I wanted to study. It was the middle of the Cold War. For your older listeners, they will remember the 1980s. You used to see bumper stickers, "Nuclear War, Let's Get It Over With." Everything was about the Soviet Union, nuclear arms, nuclear arms reductions, arms control negotiations, the fall of the Berlin Wall. So I studied international politics and Russian studies

• 6:06Speaker 05

  and Russian language. I didn't know what I wanted to do after I graduated from college. And like many good college students who don't know what they want to do, they stay in college. So I applied to graduate school.

• 6:21Speaker 05

  Stayed in graduate school and finished a PhD in international politics with a concentration in Russia, in Russian studies. And from there, I taught college. I taught mainly at the University of Memphis. I spent some time at the University of Virginia where I got my degree and did some time at University of Georgia and a postdoc at Stanford's Hoover Institute. And really enjoyed that life. And then I was talking to one of my mentors who said, "You really don't know anything until you spend some time practicing what you study."

• 7:04Speaker 05

  And urged me to do a rotation in the United States government. And so I applied for one of these fellowships where I spent a year as an arms control negotiator. And I never left government after that.

• 7:19Jack Murphy?

  Was that at the United Nations?

• 7:22Speaker 05

  No, I was assigned to a now-defunct agency of the United States government called the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. And we did negotiations at the United Nations in New York, as well as the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva and the United Nations Office in Vienna. But these negotiations could take place all over the world.

• 7:53Jack Murphy?

  Was this like SALT I, SALT II, that era?

• 7:55Speaker 05

  It was after the SALT era. I was in the late 90s. And it was the era of the landmine ban, the comprehensive nuclear test ban, fissile material cutoff. If you haven't heard of some of these things, that's because they never happened. So we spent a lot of time negotiating and not much time getting anywhere. So that was one of my jobs at what later became the State Department. ACTA was folded in to the State Department in 1999. And I also went overseas.

• 8:38Speaker 05

  And it was when I was serving overseas, I had a really good friend who was a CIA station chief. Who talked fancy to me and said, I think your talents are being wasted. As a diplomat, you'll have a lot more fun on our side. You should apply. So I did.

• 8:58Jack Murphy?

  So you, but you were in the State Department for like a full seven years, I think you said.

• 9:02Speaker 05

  Seven years, yeah, that's correct.

• 9:04Jack Murphy?

  I, was all of that in arms control?

• 9:07Speaker 05

  No, I did, I did some arms control. I did a job where I was a senior aide for a senior official where I coordinated meetings among the State Department, the NSC, and the Pentagon, which was as unfun as it sounds, but I learned a lot from that. I mean, one of my favorite stories from that job is we used to have to prepare the State Department for this once a week meeting between the Secretary of State,

• 9:50Speaker 05

  the NS, National Security Advisor, and the Secretary of Defense. And when Colin Powell became Secretary of State, our SOP for this memo is you go around the whole building and you say, what would you like the Secretary to talk to the Pentagon and the NSC about? And it's this big, long exercise. And it's very contentious and everybody wants to get their talking points in. If people really saw how it worked, they'd be horrified. And the briefing package for the Secretary was a half an inch or an inch thick.

• 10:32Speaker 05

  And I had only done it for Powell's predecessor. And then Powell's staff came back to me and said, the Secretary wants it to be shorter. I said, okay, we'll make it shorter. And so it became progressively shorter. Quarter of an inch. Now, the Secretary wants it on one page. Wow, one page from a whole briefing book down to one page. And then finally, to make a very long sordid story short, the staff said, the secretary can handle the meeting without any notes. It's fine. So different, different, uh, different leaders have different styles. And, uh, and, and Powell, Powell's style was very anti bureaucratic.

• 11:15Speaker 05

  Just tell me what it is, people, what points people want me to make. Um, I'll decide whether I want to make them and that'll be that. And I really, I really was thrilled about that because it, it shaved about 20 hours a week off of my work week.

• 11:29Jack Murphy?

  Right.

• 11:30Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 11:31Jack Murphy?

  Instead of playing back and forth with it all, all week.

• 11:33Speaker 05

  Right, right.

• 11:36Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel.

• 11:50Speaker 03

  People would always think I was lactose intolerant. So I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic. In a big way that defined a lot of my childhood.

• 12:01Speaker 00

  And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you, you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more. Because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At the Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At the Table and start listening on the free iHeart Radio app today. OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 help make it happen fast.

• 12:44Speaker 00

  Rated A plus by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval. Network freedom and flexibility, that's what you want in a healthcare plan. With a Humana Medicare Advantage PPO plan, you can see any doctor in the country who accepts Medicare, including specialists, no referrals, no kidding. Learn more at gethumana.com. See any doctor who accepts Medicare and is willing to bill Humana. Humana PPOs may not be available in all areas. Benefits and costs share may vary. Humana is a Medicare Advantage PPO organization with a Medicare contract.

• 13:28Speaker 00

  Enrollment in any Humana plan depends on contract renewal.

• 13:31Speaker 05

  And anybody who's any spent any time in the policy bureaucracy, people can fight about really tiny things. And we don't want the comma there, we want the comma here. Don't use the word happy, use the word glad.

• 13:48Speaker 05

  That's, that's, that was going from teaching policy to watching policy made.

• 13:54Jack Murphy?

  Seeing how the sausage gets made, it's not pretty.

• 13:56Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 13:56Jack Murphy?

  Um, so, uh, somebody recruits you into, or gets you interested in applying to the agency?

• 14:07Speaker 05

  I think you used the right term there, Jack. He pretty much recruited me into the agency.

• 14:10Jack Murphy?

  Yeah. Tell us how that, tell us how that process worked for you.

• 14:15Speaker 05

  Well, I, I think it's different now.

• 14:20Speaker 05

  We were friends, but we also work together. For people who aren't aware, uh, the State Department, the agency, the, the Defense Department, when it works well together, they all work well together. Uh, the, the best way of putting it is, uh, the State Department asks for non-classified information from host country. And, uh, that which the host country will not provide to the State Department, the CIA will steal. And so you have to coordinate, what is it that, that each agency acquires among the, the types of information that policymakers need?

• 15:04Speaker 05

  So you do have to do some coordination among the different agencies. So we were working together and I was friends with this particular officer who was chief of station where I was posted and he said, what's the favorite part of your job that you do? Is it making copies for the ambassador? Is it taking notes at meetings, being an overpaid stenographer? John, which was his first name, had a very direct way of insulting the work of junior state department people. And fair enough. And I said, no, my favorite part of the job is going out and talking to the locals and seeing what I can find out.

• 15:48Speaker 05

  He said, well, what if I could get you a position where that's all you did and you don't have to do the other stuff? And I said, sounds great to me. And that started the process. So I filled out an application. I was selected for interviews. I had to, I was overseas at the time, so I had to go back to Washington and do those interviews. I was offered a conditional offer of employment, sat down with my wife and talked about what it would mean. She said, I don't see any big difference in terms of we're going to be overseas, we're going to be overseas, you're going to be doing work that you like. She asked me a few questions, most of which I couldn't answer.

• 16:31Speaker 05

  And not that I didn't, that I refused to answer, I just didn't know yet what I was getting into. I wouldn't change a thing, but I think John made it sound like the transition was a little easier and a lot more seamless than it ended up being. So I was offered a position. I resigned from the State Department. I went back at the end of my tour, my State Department tour. I went through training and then I was off to my first assignment as a newly trained, newly minted case officer in the CIA.

• 17:09Jack Murphy?

  So what year did you go to the farm?

• 17:13Speaker 05

  Uh, that was 2005.

• 17:18Jack Murphy?

  Okay, okay, so now we're in the post 9/11 era.

• 17:21Speaker 05

  Yes.

• 17:22Jack Murphy?

  Shit has gotten pretty hardcore by that timeframe.

• 17:27Speaker 05

  Yes, so, uh, certainly the war on terrorism was the main thing and I had to do my part in that as we all did. I did two Warzone tours, one in the Horn of Africa and one in South Asia. You can figure out what those countries are. My main interest at the time was recruiting Russians, was working against Russians. I had, at the time, a pretty good Serbo-Croatian.

• 18:06Speaker 05

  I had decent Russian and I had serviceable French. I can't speak any of them well or hardly at all right now. But I think that was, that was something that appealed to the agency at the time because getting people trained up in language is always a priority and has always been a priority for the, for the agency.

• 18:32Jack Murphy?

  Hey guys, it's Jack. I want to tell you guys about the sponsor for today's show. It's Mando. Mando makes a whole series of male grooming products. They are unique in that they are a deodorant that you can use all over your body, on armpits if you like, but also wherever else you may deem necessary. And I have been using these products for about three months now. I've been using the Body Wash, it's bourbon leather. I've been using their Bar of Soap, which I really enjoyed, and also their deodorant. And so I exercise a lot and get very sweaty, so I need a deodorant that's gonna do the job and Mando has come through for me. You know, the Body Wash was great. I actually used all of that, need to

• 19:17Jack Murphy?

  reorder some more. The Bar of Soap is also very cool. It was Very, um, very smooth, actually. So I hope you guys will go and check them out. They have a starter kit that's up there and they have a special deal for Team House viewers. So the starter pack is perfect for new customers. It comes with a solid stick deodorant, cream tube deodorant, two free products of your choice, like mini body wash and deodorant wipes and free shipping. As a special offer for listeners, new customers get $5 off a starter pack with our exclusive code. That equates to over 40% off your starter pack.

• 19:53Jack Murphy?

  Use code TEAMHOUSE at shopmando.com. That's S-H-O-P-M-A-N-D-O dot com. Please support our show and tell them we sent you. Smell fresher, stay drier and boost your confidence from head to toe with Mando.

• 20:12Speaker 05

  The irony in that is I always thought, since I was coming from the agency, uh, into the agency from the State Department, that I would be a relatively, uh, deep State Department covered, uh, officer. And when I got to the agency, they said, "No, you will be, you'll be declared to the locals." I said, "But, but everybody knows me already as State Department." And, uh, they told me, uh, "No, no, they don't. They, they think you're agency. They thought you were agency before." And I found this really shocking. And then I realized,

• 20:53Speaker 05

  uh, later, most foreigners think everybody's agency.

• 20:59Jack Murphy?

  Yeah.

• 20:59Speaker 05

  It doesn't really matter what they do or how they behave. And when you look at countries like Russia and China, which most of their overseas personnel are in fact intelligence officers, they're simply projecting that, that we do the same thing.

• 21:15Speaker 05

  So the irony is I went from the State Department to the agency and the, the foreign targets thought I was agency the whole time.

• 21:22Jack Murphy?

  So what are you allowed to say about, you know, your first tour abroad?

• 21:28Speaker 05

  Well, I was declared to the locals. I did not, I was, I was not in an embassy facility. We worked a lot of issues having to do with, it was in the Balkans. We worked a lot of issues having to do with suspected terrorist networks in the Balkans, financing in the Balkans. There was also a large Iranian presence in the Balkans and so we spent, we spent a good bit of time on that target as well. The one thing I think a lot of people don't understand in terms of the difference between

• 22:10Speaker 05

  the State Department on the one hand and the agency on the other overseas is, the State Department's 99% focused on the bilateral relationship where the embassy is located. So if you're in Berserkistan, the State Department's concerned with Berserkistan. That's not the case for the agency. The agency's really focused on global threats to the United States and in any given location, depending on the presence, you're focused on Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.

• 22:47Jack Murphy?

  Right.

• 22:47Speaker 05

  As well as nonproliferation and terrorism, counter narcotics and some other topics. But, but for me, most of my focus was on those four targets. I, I remember once I was talking to my mom and I, I told her I was going to this very lovely, advanced, democratic, Western European country and she said, "You're, you're gonna spy on, on, on our friends?" I said, "No, I'm gonna spy with our friends. I'm still gonna spy on Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and North Koreans." It was hard for her to grasp why we were, why we were in places like, not that I was there, but England and France and Germany and Italy.

• 23:32Jack Murphy?

  And also all the, a lot of the stations in Africa. I mean, you're really looking for Russians and other, other targets.

• 23:39Speaker 05

  Yeah, I did, I did two tours in Africa, both as, both as a chief of station and we were not remotely interested in, in collecting on, on the locals.

• 23:52Jack Murphy?

  So like, let's get into some funny, you had mentioned before the show, some funny case officer stories and different experiences that you had. And I know we can't necessarily talk about what country you were in at that time, but I think we can talk around it a little bit, right?

• 24:09Speaker 05

  Yeah. What people don't realize is that it's like any other job, right? It's not, it's not what they see on TV or the movies. It's, it's like the military, it's the same thing. You have your moments of levity. It's, it's, you're with your friends, you spend a lot of time in an office. And even the job has its, its lighter moments. For us, one of the things that was interesting is, we always wanted to do whatever we could to talk to potential targets and potential recruits. The United States had no problem with its

• 24:50Speaker 05

  officers talking to Russians or Chinese or Iranians or North Koreans, but their governments had a very different view. And they were told if you see an American, American means CIA, you don't want to talk to that person, particularly alone, because you could get in trouble. And so, we spent a lot of time trying to find these targets alone, and they spent a lot of time not, or trying not to be found. And as I was telling you earlier, I had one place that I lived where I lived catty corner, across a park, from a particular

• 25:30Speaker 05

  Russian, we would like to talk to. So every morning and every evening, I walked my dog by that guy's house. So if you think about your average teenager stalking, you know, potential romantic interest, not that I encourage that, it's a very similar kind of dynamic. And so I happened to run into this guy.

• 25:54Speaker 05

  At a reception and I said, hey, you know, I walk my dog by your house. Sometimes we should, we should have a cup of coffee or a drink and have a chat. And he said, yeah, I know you walk your dog every morning and every night, same place. And there's a reason that we don't have a chat and there's a reason that you never see me outside. And there's a reason I never invite you in. And he turned around and he walked away. And he made clear that I wasn't going to get that invitation. So as I was walking out of the reception, I said, you could drop by my place if that's easier. But he was, he was not, he was not taking me up on that.

• 26:34Jack Murphy?

  How do you like try to get around? I mean, obviously that guy was probably a lost cause. But I mean, you're dealing with some very hard targets. People that have a pretty good idea of who you are and what you represent. How do you like try to get around that, you know, those walls that are kind of immediately up?

• 26:51Speaker 05

  Yeah, that's a great question, Jack. And every case is different. In some cases, it's quite useful. They know who you are. You've gotten that out of the way. And if they know who you are and they're willing to talk to you particularly alone, you've gotten a good way towards where you want to go with that target. In other cases, you can't be,

• 27:12Speaker 05

  you can't be more open about what your real job is. Because they would never, ever talk to you. And in many cases, you can't even be an American and talk to them. So you have to find a way, without going into too much detail, you have to find a way of finding some way for that target to want to talk to you. Or talk to somebody who can get you the information that you want to get. But every case, every case is different. It's a, it's a great question. It's, it's really the question is how do you get somebody who doesn't want to necessarily

• 27:55Speaker 05

  reveal information or doesn't want to reveal information under certain circumstances to part with that information. And that's what the agency is paid to figure out.

• 28:05Jack Murphy?

  You had another story about you were trying to follow a North Korean to see what hotel he was going to stay in?

• 28:12Speaker 05

  Yeah. So this was one where.

• 28:16Speaker 05

  We didn't want to work with the locals. We could have, we could have worked with the locals to figure this out. We wanted to keep this to ourselves. The North Koreans were not resident in the country where we were stationed. And we knew, never mind how, we knew this person was only staying in town one night. And we really wanted to talk to this guy. And he came in on a ferry. And we really messed this up. I should have been driving. The case officer working for me should have been the passenger. So he dropped me off so that I could keep eyes on when the ferry came in and I could find the North Korean.

• 29:01Speaker 05

  So we could figure out when we could get him alone and make the approach to talk to him. And he got off the ferry. He was, he was met immediately by a phalanx of staff with official North Korean cars. And we couldn't find a place to park. Traffic was too, too hot. And the tip we received was too recent in order to set up earlier. So this was, it was really quite a cluster. So the younger officer was driving. I'm in the passenger seat. I said, I'll just get out on foot. It's downtown. I don't think the car could get very far.

• 29:42Speaker 05

  I know that there's a, a section where there's a huge number of hotels that foreigners like, and it's nearby. I had overestimated or underestimated the distance on that. I'll just see if I can catch a tram or keep eyes on the car. And I always tell people, the job is not like the movies. I've never run. I've never jumped. I've never hit anybody. I've never, I hardly ever carried a weapon, except in the war zone. I never fired it in anger. It's a, it's a job that involves a lot of planning. It's, it's an intellectual job. It's, it's a, it's a planning, thinking job. But there I was, in the middle of this West European capital city,

• 30:27Speaker 05

  with this North Korean. And we, there are 20 hotels within two blocks. I really need to find out what this hotel is. So the car gets into traffic and I have no other way of following him except to run. So there I am.

• 30:45Speaker 05

  You know, in a sport jacket and jeans, running down the middle of the street, chasing this North Korean in this Mercedes, way out of shape. You know, I'm way past forty at this point, way out of shape. And people are looking at me going, "Look at that crazy guy just running down the street."

• 31:07Jack Murphy?

  I was gonna say, this must be like a fairly permissive country. Otherwise, there'd be like counterintelligence guys like batoning you in the street, right?

• 31:15Speaker 05

  No, no, no. This was a friendly, West European country. With a lot of blond-haired, blue-eyed, tall people. I am not blond-haired, I am not blue-eyed, and I am not tall.

• 31:31Speaker 05

  And it's one of those countries where they take one look at you and it looks like you got an American flag tattooed on your forehead. They know. And they're probably saying, "Look at that crazy American just running down the street." Boy, they exercise in the weirdest clothes and at the weirdest times. But that's the kind of goofy stuff that happens. And of course, you know, you get back to the station. I run into all these hotels and I ask, "Hey, is this person under this name just checked in?" And I'm huffing and puffing, I'm covered in sweat. And it's not my finest hour. So, that's one of those stories. I get back to station, I tell the story, and the next day,

• 32:13Speaker 05

  I have a pile of running shoes stacked at my office door and an application for a gym membership. Because people really enjoy other people's failures and embarrassments. Particularly, at that time, I was the chief of station. So, it was good fun.

• 32:38Jack Murphy?

  Did you ever catch up with that North Korean dude?

• 32:42Speaker 05

  We did not. We found, we, we found the hotel, but we could never get him alone.

• 32:46Jack Murphy?

  Ah, okay.

• 32:48Speaker 05

  A, a conversation with that kind of target in a crowd is not what you want. And that's usually on purpose. They do, they do that. They've got a two-person rule. Uh, generally, um, this person had something like a seven-person rule. So we, we found him. We found what hotel he was in. Um, we, we tried to set up on him, but we really only had about 20 hours uh, to do it. And, and again, as I think I've mentioned, that the job of case officer, the job of the CIA is mostly failure. You are, you are trying again and again and again

• 33:29Speaker 05

  to get people who have secrets to give them to you in a way that protects that transaction and protects them. And so I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that the failure rate is much higher than 99%. This is, um, it's a bit of a joke at times where, where we compliment each other saying, wow, you're, you'd be a really good CO. You're used to failure. But, but there's truth, there's truth in the insult. There's truth in the joke is you have to be mentally and emotionally resilient. Um, you, you try and you try and you try and

• 34:13Speaker 05

  you figure out different ways, different scenarios, different people to get in front of the people who have the information that you need to serve the US national security interest. In most of those cases, you will not succeed. More than that, you have to do it in a way that's, um...

• 34:38Speaker 05

  That can be explained, it doesn't always look like what it is.

• 34:44Speaker 05

  Anybody can walk up to any Russian and say, "Hi, I am a US intelligence officer. Please give me your secrets, I'll pay you a lot of money." That's not a recipe for success.

• 35:00Speaker 05

  You're not going to get too many people saying yes to that. So, there's an art to it. And you learn the techniques when you go through training.

• 35:12Speaker 05

  And then you figure out the art by your personality and your experience. But you had mentioned earlier, Jack, it's a bit like dating.

• 35:24Jack Murphy?

  Yeah.

• 35:25Speaker 05

  That's a fair comparison. You wouldn't walk up to an object of romantic interest and say, "Hi, I'll give you a ton of money if you marry me." You're not generally going to meet with success. And if you do, perhaps that's not the person that you want to marry.

• 35:48Jack Murphy?

  Yeah, you're asking a hundred girls out on a date and one of them says yes.

• 35:52Speaker 05

  Yeah, so it's a real challenge. And I think what I liked about it was, you spend a lot of time planning. You execute the operation, if it goes well, you get another meeting, if it goes well, it will lead to something. But really, most of your time doing this, again, why it doesn't make great TV or movies, most of your time doing this is the planning and then the write-up of what the meeting went like and whatever intelligence you got. And that's just not gripping entertainment.

• 36:33Jack Murphy?

  Well, uh, let's talk about some other stories about, uh, the Russians. Um, like you had one where you were playing tennis with Russians to try to pitch them.

• 36:43Speaker 05

  Yeah, uh, we, you try to meet, uh, targets and potential targets in any kind of situation where you can foster some kind of communication that's natural, that doesn't look like you're doing what you're doing. Uh, one of the things that I really liked and that other officers liked were athletic events. I don't golf, so I would, I would play tennis and I'd look for the places where, uh, Russians and other targets played tennis. And a lot of countries have, um, various diplomatic clubs and diplomatic activities. And, uh, in this one place, uh,

• 37:25Speaker 05

  we had a diplomatic tennis tournament and I was, my, my opponent was a Russian intelligence officer whom I, I knew through research very well. I was very excited to see that the draw, uh, put us against each other. I, I to this day think that that was accidental. If it wasn't, kudos to whoever arranged that. So we, we played our match and, uh, we sat down with a whole bunch of other people. It was very natural. And, uh, we're having a drink after, after playing and, uh, I mentioned to this Russian intelligence officer that I thought that we lived in the same neighborhood. And, uh, he started to laugh a little bit

• 38:08Speaker 05

  and said, yes, I expect that we did. It might be because I walked by his house every day, every morning and every night with my dog. Different Russian intelligence officer, by the way, from the one I was talking about. Um, but my, my dog walks were my, my- Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel. People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my

• 38:44Speaker 00

  Explanation to I'm deathly allergic in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood. And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At The Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At The Table and start listening on the free iHeart radio app today.

• 39:21Speaker 02

  Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 39:51Speaker 05

  I go to M.O. And, uh, and, uh, I mentioned offhand, hey, we should play tennis sometime, not just in the tournament. He said, yeah, that would be great.

• 40:04Speaker 05

  So later I ran into him in the neighborhood and I said, how about that tennis? And, uh, and he, and he nodded, uh, noncommittally. And I said, what about, uh, what about this Friday after work? And he said, uh, Friday's no good for me. Friday, I'm busy. And, uh, I said, Saturday? He said, no, no, Saturday won't work. Sunday? He said, let me save you some time, Glenn. I'm never going to be available for tennis with you, ever. We can play never. I appreciate how hard you work, uh, but that's not going to happen. And he smiled and he bid me a good day and, and that was that.

• 40:49Speaker 05

  But again, you know, it's like Wayne Gretzky said, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take, that doesn't really make much sense, but I get what he's trying to say is if you don't try to set up a meeting in some sort of natural way, you're never going to get those meetings.

• 41:04Jack Murphy?

  Well, yeah, he understands how the game is played.

• 41:06Speaker 05

  He understands how the game is played, but what was really interesting to me is at no point ever in my career did I ever see a Russian or a North Korean or Iranian or Chinese ever try to set up a one-on-one with an American. They're much more afraid of engaging with us than we are with them.

• 41:27Jack Murphy?

  Oh, because they're afraid that if they try to recruit, that their own people are going to get turned or something like that?

• 41:34Speaker 05

  They just don't trust their people. They don't, they don't trust their people. They don't trust their people to meet one-on-one with, with not just Americans, with, with anybody from a, from a democratic country.

• 41:49Jack Murphy?

  They... Paranoia.

• 41:51Speaker 05

  They're, they're paranoid. And I think justifiably that if you can get one of them alone, you can, you can make progress, and if you can't get them alone, you can't make progress. So they understand that, but it, but it speaks to, I think, which system is superior. And I always took solace in that, that there, there are many more defectors from Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran to the United States than vice versa.

• 42:24Jack Murphy?

  Yeah, yeah.

• 42:25Speaker 05

  There's a few, there's a few, and it's the same way. There's many more people who, uh, will, from the United States, who, who can engage one-on-one with officers from those other countries than vice versa. They, they always, whenever I had the chance to talk to them, it was always in groups, and they always made sure that anything that we were going to be at together had more than one Russian, because even if their, their behavior is...

• 43:02Speaker 05

  Loyal to Russia, we'll call it, or loyal to the Putin government. I wouldn't necessarily call that loyal to Russia. Even if their behavior is loyal to the Putin government, if they're alone, they have to defend that behavior. And they face a lot of questioning and a lot of distrust if they ever allow themselves to be alone with Americans. And so they took great pains to avoid that, including jumping off of moving buses and running through.

• 43:36Jack Murphy?

  Tell us that story.

• 43:38Speaker 05

  Yeah, I was on a, I was on a, I was on one of these shuttles from a, from a plane, coming from a third location into the city where we were both stationed. And the Russian saw me on the, on the, on the, on the bus and jumped off while it was moving to get away from me because he had assumed I had arranged this in order to, to, to follow him and get in front of him. Um, that, that was, that was, uh, that was remarkable. I don't know what, what he was afraid of. It was a bus full of people and it was going to a crowded terminal. But it just shows you the level of paranoia and nervousness

• 44:21Speaker 05

  that they have about being, being seen anywhere as being alone with Americans. We had another one where it was quite the opposite. Uh, we found out through various means that a couple of Chinese targets were going to be on a, on a tourist boat in a, in a city where we were stationed. And they knew us, so we had to be careful that they couldn't see us on the, on the boat. So we, we paid a couple of bucks to the deckhand to let us know right exactly when the boat was shoving off. Uh, and we ran and jumped on the boat

• 45:06Speaker 05

  just as it was pulling away from the dock so that the objects of our interest could not leave before we had time with them. So that was lovely. We got, uh, we got three officers in front of three potential targets over the course of three hours on this tour.

• 45:23Jack Murphy?

  You had another story about approaching some Chinese intelligence officials, right? Where the wife started freaking out on you?

• 45:30Speaker 05

  Yeah, yeah, that one was, that one was with partners. They had set it up for me. They said, look, it's too sensitive for us to approach a Chinese intelligence officer because of our bilateral relations. But I know that you've been looking to do this, wink, wink, nod, nod. Here in our country, we're willing to help you do this. So they were essentially saying yes to a, to a request that I had made many times. So they, they assisted me. I had a, I had an earpiece, they had an earpiece.

• 46:12Speaker 05

  They directed me to where this person was, and his wife was also an intelligence officer. They were shopping in a, in a secondhand store. And I, and I happened to bump into them at the second floor of this very fancy secondhand store. I can, I can tell you some European secondhand stores are very nice. And I, I, I pretended as if we had met before. Again, like dating, haven't we met somewhere before? I mean, it's a cheesy line. And, and, and he said, no, I don't think so. And, and I, I made up the place where we had met. And he was curious and he started to engage me. And the only reason I was able to talk to him is he was on the upstairs and his wife was on the downstairs.

• 46:57Speaker 05

  Well, she was far sharper than he was. Because she came upstairs to get him and saw us chatting and not even, not even half a second, she started yelling at the top of her lungs, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Maybe 10 times. No, no, no, no, no. And, and almost pulled her husband off his feet so that he fell down the stairs. He really had to catch himself.

• 47:27Jack Murphy?

  Very subtle.

• 47:28Speaker 05

  And he had no idea what was happening. And then I heard her berating him in what I can assume is Mandarin.

• 47:37Speaker 05

  Uh, whi- which I, I don't speak. And, um, and what I also heard in my earpiece was our partners laughing. Uh, their ass. Yeah, they, they thought this was really funny. Um, and so then we had the after action. And after that, uh, on every whiteboard in station and every answer I got, uh, from station, any question I had was written or said, uh, no, no, no, no, no. In, in five or six different languages.

• 48:11Jack Murphy?

  And they really loved you.

• 48:13Speaker 05

  Sorry?

• 48:14Jack Murphy?

  They really loved you. They loved breaking your balls.

• 48:16Speaker 05

  Yeah, they did. They did. Well, that's the culture, right?

• 48:18Jack Murphy?

  Yeah, yeah.

• 48:19Speaker 05

  Similar, I think, in, in, uh, the special operations world and in, uh, in a lot of the corporate world, it's, I, I took it with the, uh, with the spirit with which it was intended. Um, yeah, there was a lot of no, no, no, no, no on the whiteboard after that.

• 48:38Jack Murphy?

  Um, so we've, we've talked a lot of the, a lot of these funny stories about, you know, the failures. As you said, you have to have thick skin and be, be able to tolerate failures. Do you have any where you can talk about, you know, where you were like, okay, I did the job right today, brought home the bacon, got the cheddar. Uh, you know, that, that you can, uh, talk about it all?

• 49:01Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a great, it's a great question, Jack. And, uh, the, the line we all toss out, and we're all programmed with this is, the world finds out about our failures and seldom sees our successes. And, and we just have to keep it that way. I, I would say that, uh, there were enough successes that, that it leavened the failure. Uh, they're, they're hugely satisfying because they are so rare.

• 49:33Speaker 05

  I would love to be able to brag Yeah, I get it. About what we did. It... I will say to the people listening and paying attention, we have the successes. We do. Some of them are in the history books. They're just decades old, and that's for a reason. But what fascinates me is this job changes in the way that we do it. It changes because of technology. It changes because of politics, but the fundamentals never change.

• 50:15Speaker 05

  You have allies, you have adversaries, you have countries in between. They keep certain information secret. They spend a great deal of money and effort to keep it secret. And it's information that we need for our policymakers, our Defense Department, our warfighters, in order that they can succeed. And I think one of the things that always kept us going, and we hardly ever talked about, was we believed that we were doing critical work. And we understood that we had to endure many, many, many failures between successes.

• 50:59Speaker 05

  But those successes really made it worthwhile. And you would get... You'd get your recognition inside, right? I have great appreciation for the end of that movie, "Argo", where Mendez says, "Hey, can I bring my kid to the ceremony?" You can actually bring your kids to the ceremony. You just can't take the medal home with you. And the other thing that I found funny about that is I heard, and I have no confirmation that it's true,

• 51:42Speaker 05

  but I heard, because people like to razz me about my State Department background.

• 51:49Speaker 05

  That the line that Downey, the Deputy Director for Operations, told Mendez at the end of that successful operations, he says in the movie, "If you want applause, join the circus." And I'm told that the real line from the Deputy Director of Operations was, "If you want applause, join the State Department."

• 52:14Speaker 03

  You know, we know that like the, obviously, sometimes, you know, you work an asset or a source who may not have the access or may be lying and kind of fizzles or isn't what you hope. But have there been times where somebody was just a bonanza that you couldn't even imagine? Where what they had access to was like so much more than what you were expecting?

• 52:39Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 52:42Speaker 05

  Yeah, that's a, that's a great question. How do you know that what your asset has given you is true? And we spend a lot of time and effort on that. It's a critical question for everything that everybody does. How do you know that what you're getting is real? This is, this is, it goes for business information, it goes for journalism. Especially when you have in intelligence, people who deliberately mislead you. And we know that our adversaries do this. They produce, they will give you real information in order to give you mostly fake information.

• 53:21Speaker 05

  And that is an art and a science unto itself. The paradox is this. The more secret the information, the more valuable the information, the harder it is to validate. So for example, if, if we were to get, and I'm making this up, the personal secretary to Vladimir Putin, and who's the, takes notes at all of his meetings, and is the only person in common at all of these meetings, that would truly be a bonanza. To get the perceptions, plans, intentions of one of America's most dedicated adversaries.

• 54:08Speaker 05

  How do you validate information that only one or two people have?

• 54:13Speaker 05

  So what you have to do is you have to test the veracity of the asset. You have to test the identity of the asset. You have to test the consistency of the asset. You find ways of looking, do they tell the truth in other situations? It's not easy and there's no fail-safe method of doing that. If, on the other hand, you have lots of methods for corroborating what an asset will give you, then how valuable is that asset? So that's that balance all the time that you have to do in counterintelligence

• 54:55Speaker 05

  and asset validation to find out, is this person, who the person says? Does the person have the position? Is the information true? Is this person telling the truth to you? And there's different ways of doing that. And most of them are not particularly arcane or secret. Cops know how to do this. Lawyers know how to do this. Journalists know how to do this. All kinds of investigators and due diligence practitioners in the finance and corporate world know how to do this. There's gonna be a trail.

• 55:35Speaker 05

  I think the biggest asset that we can have in that case is always to be skeptical, always to be willing to test your hypotheses. We have this saying among case officers, "Don't fall in love with your asset. Don't fall in love with your source." And it's not a literal warning, although also good advice. Don't fall in love with your source. Can't do that either. You have to treat any information that you get, that's secret, protected information, from a clandestine source with skepticism.

• 56:18Speaker 05

  And that's why, when we put out the intelligence, we put out

• 56:25Speaker 05

  conditions on the intelligence. This is a new source, not validated. This is a trusted source, validated over time, whose reporting has been tested against predictions that has been turned out to be true. So, every policymaker will see a source description and a byline that says something about this source provided this information firsthand, which is, of course, the gold standard, not secondhand, not thirdhand, for sure.

• 57:00Speaker 05

  And had natural access to this information. And you look at, you look at all of those conditions. If, if you tell, if you come to me, guys, and you say you have intelligence on the, the order of battle of Berserkistan, but you're not from Berserkistan, you've never been to Berserkistan, you can't explain to me what the chain of custody for that information is, then, then I have to treat that with with disbelief. And we've had cases like that, where people said, you know, I, I remember, I was in East Africa, and we had a source

• 57:45Speaker 05

  who claimed to have information from a particular terrorist group. And we knew that that terrorist group was, was one clan of this, this ethnic group. And the source wasn't that clan. It just wasn't believable. How, how did you, I don't even know how you would have gotten to the place where that clan operates and survived, let alone get access to that information. And it's not a perfect science. Sometimes we're wrong in that we disbelieve things that are true. And sometimes we're wrong in that we believe things that turned out not to be true. But in general, I think the agency...

• 58:27Speaker 05

  More so than any other institution in the United States government.

• 58:35Speaker 05

  With my bias, obviously, was very willing to test its assumptions about the validity of the information that it collected.

• 58:46Jack Murphy?

  Can you tell us a little bit about your wartime tours and kind of how that differed from the time you spent in, you know, Western Europe?

• 58:54Speaker 05

  Yeah, those are, those are very different kinds of jobs. For one thing, counterterrorism and traditional, what we call FI, foreign intelligence, they're, they're different disciplines. You're collecting different types of information, you have different kinds of sources. It's, it's much more tactical and far less strategic. It is about, it is, it is closer, I think, to tactical military intelligence than it is to strategic foreign intelligence of the kind that the CIA, NSA, and other organizations

• 59:37Speaker 05

  practice against peer competitors in a geopolitical sense. It's very focused on, here are the actors, here are their capabilities, here's their location, we're going to provide that to the military to take the appropriate action. It's, it's much more day-to-day, it's much more tactical, and it's, it's much more restricted. I was not a paramilitary officer. I did not, I did not leave the compound all that often. I met, I met

• 1:00:17Speaker 05

  contacts, usually in the compound, who were brought in by others.

• 1:00:23Speaker 05

  And that has its own limitations that it imposes on what you can do. Getting somebody clandestinely in a compound and out of a compound has its challenges. So it's a much different experience. I'm glad I got to do it. I learned a lot from doing it. We got to work with the military a lot more closely in many cases than we would have and did in some of the strategic FI efforts that we made. So it's almost like you're in a different agency.

• 1:01:06Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:01:07Speaker 05

  Different task, it's a different set of skills. It's much more debriefing. Yes, you're still recruiting. Yes, you're still finding and developing assets, but it's more compressed. Recruiting a hard target, as we say, a Russian, a Chinese, can take anywhere from, if you're lucky, months to years. Recruiting assets in a counterterrorism sense is days to weeks.

• 1:01:46Speaker 03

  We've been told before by other people on the show that there is kind of a rift in the agency over this kind of tactical intelligence versus, you know, the CIA out there doing the FI that they're born and bred to do outside of the paramilitary. Did you fall on either side of that in terms of, did you feel that maybe the agency had too many resources dedicated to these things where it really wasn't their typical wheelhouse? Or did you feel that...

• 1:02:26Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a great question. I don't know that I'd agree that there was a rift. Okay. You're always going to get people who have their preferences. Mine was strategic FI against hard targets. But it's not up to the agency to decide who the targets are. That's up to the policymakers. Right. To say, this is what we want to collect on. And we salute and we proceed according to what the policymakers need and want.

• 1:03:04Speaker 05

  I think, in my own personal opinion, that the agency is much more set up for strategic FI. That said, I think the agency did a good job in the tactical acquisition of intelligence in those war zones and for counter terrorist purposes. I think, again, personal opinion, this is Glenn Chaffin.

• 1:03:38Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel.

• 1:03:53Speaker 05

  People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic, in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood.

• 1:04:04Speaker 00

  And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more, because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At the Table, the food allergy podcast, on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At the Table and start listening on the free iHeartRadio app today. OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 help make it happen fast.

• 1:04:47Speaker 00

  Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of 5-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 1:05:04Speaker 05

  On a soapbox, you know, as a taxpayer, I think that the terrorism mission is more aligned for military intelligence and the FBI because in many cases terrorism is crime. It is crime and they're very good at it. And that, I still say "we," it's an old tic. I'm no longer "we." I haven't been since 2019. But I think the CIA's greatest strength is in collecting that strategic FI against peer competitors.

• 1:05:43Speaker 05

  Whether the United States government spent too much of its resources, of its blood and treasure on the counterterrorism mission is really a political question, not a question for intelligence. My view is I would rather spend most of our money going after countries, this is a political statement, a political judgment, going after countries that can destroy America rather than going after countries who can kill Americans.

• 1:06:26Speaker 03

  Right, makes sense.

• 1:06:27Speaker 05

  And not that we ignore that second one, I just thought that DOD was very good at that and FBI was very good at that. And China and Russia didn't go away during that time, neither did Iran and North Korea.

• 1:06:42Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:06:42Speaker 05

  And you only have a finite amount of of money that you can spend and talent that you can dedicate to certain missions. My particular preference was the strategic mission. I wouldn't say I was a rift, there was no, I don't think there was any, I never saw any conflict. And I, I think everybody did their part on, on the global war on terrorism. I didn't see anybody say, I'm not doing that.

• 1:07:14Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:07:14Speaker 05

  There's certainly no, no leaders said, I'm not going to use my people for that. Everybody did their part. They understood that this was the decision of the civilian leaders of the government and the CIA works for the president and the president's team and works for the policymakers, provides intelligence for the State Department and the Defense Department and the Treasury Department and the White House, the, the agency doesn't determine its own priorities.

• 1:07:45Speaker 03

  Right, and I mean, it's really a testament to the men and women of the CIA because it's not the military, they can like say where they'd like you to go, but people can refuse, like it's not, they're not under the UCMJ, right?

• 1:07:59Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 1:07:59Speaker 03

  And they still fill those positions, people still volunteered and, and rogered up for those positions.

• 1:08:05Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a great point. You, you can turn down that job and it might not be great for your career, but you're not going to jail.

• 1:08:12Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:08:13Speaker 05

  If, if you don't go to Iraq or Afghanistan or Somalia or Syria or, or any of the places where.

• 1:08:22Speaker 05

  We had people in active war zones. So you're absolutely right. You you join the military, you don't have a say where you're going. I think some people, to be frank, loved it. Some people I I met loved the war zone.

• 1:08:39Jack Murphy?

  Yeah.

• 1:08:40Speaker 05

  They they thrived there. Certainly, the paramilitary officers.

• 1:08:47Speaker 05

  I'm not going to say that they loved it, but they were. This was their thing. It's not their only thing. But collecting intelligence in lethal environments is what they're uniquely trained for. And they're really impressive people because they can do it all. They can do the F I. And they can do the paramilitary work and they can do the they can do the C T work. They're really amazing. They speak foreign languages. They're really amazing people. I I think some people got a taste of the war zone and decided that this is what they liked more. So

• 1:09:26Speaker 05

  as far as my own experience was to each his own. I think we always had enough people to staff to staff the war zones. And and we always had enough people to do the F I mission.

• 1:09:40Jack Murphy?

  Mm hmm. And from there, you had a domestic assignment with National Resources.

• 1:09:48Speaker 05

  Yeah, I can't tell you where. I can I can tell you that I worked closely with FBI and that was that was really fun. I I had some great friendships there. That's also a different discipline. Because in abroad, you're the D N I rep. When you're the chief of station, you are in charge of all human operations in the country. When you're in the United States, you are you you operate according to the the patience and sufferance of our of our brethren in the FBI. And that was that was very, very illuminating. And maybe maybe your listeners know, maybe they don't know.

• 1:10:33Speaker 05

  The CIA can operate in the United States. It cannot operate against Americans.

• 1:10:41Speaker 05

  And that's the distinction. This CIA officer can engage with foreign targets in the United States. You simply have to coordinate that, in essence, get permission and support from the local FBI field office in that regard. So that was great. I got to see, I got to see the FBI operate both in the United States and abroad. There were cases where we had the FBI abroad because we had Americans who were operating with terrorist groups and

• 1:11:21Speaker 05

  they had committed crimes and the FBI came over and dealt with those Americans. And I have to say, I would be disingenuous to, to claim that CIA always got along with FBI in every case, every time. That's famously not true. And I certainly had my share of those experiences, but that was a minority of my experiences. I was very impressed with the professionalism and dedication and skill of the FBI in the cases that I worked with them in the United States and abroad in the, in the war zone.

• 1:12:02Jack Murphy?

  And then you ended up as the chief of tradecraft and that was a new position, right?

• 1:12:09Speaker 05

  It was a new position.

• 1:12:10Jack Murphy?

  Tell us about how that position got instituted, why it came about.

• 1:12:13Speaker 03

  And, and what year was that?

• 1:12:15Speaker 05

  That was 2018, I believe. We had had tradecraft positions throughout the DO in training and in particular subject areas.

• 1:12:37Speaker 05

  And a lot of people came before me and did the intellectual spade work. I stood on the shoulders of much more creative, much more dedicated, much more knowledgeable people. What happened is we had all these different groups who were looking essentially at technological and commercial changes and the implications for our business. And principally, what we're talking about are cameras, smartphones, cheap data, and ever more powerful computing capability.

• 1:13:20Speaker 05

  And as we started examining our operations, we realized that we could not use the old tradecraft in the same way.

• 1:13:35Speaker 05

  And so, the leaders of the DO at the time decided that they needed to have an office. It was originally in the DO, I think it's a separate center now. But when I did it, it was part of the office of the DDO. That they needed to have an office that examined the implications of all these technologies and commercial behaviors, and I'll use Google as an example, to say, "What does this mean for how we do our business? How is it that we can find people who have information,

• 1:14:19Speaker 05

  communicate with those people, keep them safe, acquire that information, and communicate that information without being known?" And so, I was charged with coming up with a plan for how that would affect.

• 1:14:39Speaker 05

  Recruiting, training, facilities. You know, particular practices that we engaged in. Funding, where we put people, travel, you name it. If it's affected by the collection of data, if it's affected by cameras, if it's affected by cell phones, if it's affected by the cars that you drive, what does this mean for what we do? And it was, I'm glad I got to do it. I had originally planned to retire after my last post overseas. The DDO and his deputies convinced me

• 1:15:22Speaker 05

  that this would be a really interesting job to do. And so I did it as my last tour before I retired and then turned it over. Just as I took it from smarter, more knowledgeable people, I turned it over to them. But the agency had been doing, and the DDO had been doing a lot of work on this for a long time. One of the things that was really fascinating to me when I first started in that job is I went to our in-house journal, which is called Studies in Intelligence. And I found articles about this from the 1950s, 1960s. People saying, okay. And then when cell phones first came out,

• 1:16:06Speaker 05

  what are we going to do about this? Or when, you know, in 1980, I think, I think a megabyte of data or a gigabyte. I can't remember my stats. You guys will have to go on Google and correct me. I think maybe it was a gig of data, a meg of data. I can't remember my stats. Took up the space of a refrigerator. Yeah. And probably cost a few million dollars. Now it takes up the space of a quarter of my... Pinky nail and cost a few pennies.

• 1:16:42Speaker 05

  Now, if you can collect the 23 sextillion bytes of data on where you guys go and where I go and what we do every day and what we look up on the net and what we buy and who we talk to. For pennies on the dollar, that's going to have obvious implications for people trying to do things in secret. And that's really what we looked at. And they're still looking at because this technology is really transformational in terms of privacy. And if the commercial world could recognize that, we had to recognize it.

• 1:17:25Speaker 03

  It's evolving quickly, I mean, super quickly too, yeah.

• 1:17:28Jack Murphy?

  Can you get a little deeper into, you know, what we now call ubiquitous technical surveillance, the biometrics, the constant surveillance and so on? And like, what that means for the intelligence community that like these old school methods of having like forged documents like in a spy movie in the 50s? It's just, it's just not going to work anymore.

• 1:17:49Speaker 03

  And to add to that, you know, the DO and DSNT used to be like these two separate things and it almost seems like your position straddled those two worlds.

• 1:18:03Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a great point. In fact, I had a counterpart in the DST and we worked very closely together. And it was really amazing to me when we started working together, we had a, what do you want to call it, a task force where it was, where it was the whole agency working on this, not just the DO. And I think that still exists. And also other agencies because you can't, you can't do data in a vacuum.

• 1:18:32Speaker 05

  So, uh, yeah, the implications I think are pretty evident if you start going, for example, through a typical day that each one of you might have, right? You wake up and you look at, what's the first thing you do? You look at your cellphone.

• 1:18:50Speaker 05

  Well, when you do that, everything that you look at, that's recorded and that's transmitted to somebody. So, here we are. What is it they're looking at? What's their news site that they look at? Okay, we're gonna, all of this, of course, is to sell you ads. And as whenever I talk to the representatives from all these companies, they'd say, of course, it's to make your life better. Right, right. And I'd say, it doesn't make my life better, Mr. Tech Company. It really complicates it a lot. But I would think about this a lot in my civilian life, because that's easier to talk about. So I remember my wife and I, one day when we were still living on the East Coast, we traveled to, up to New York City where my daughter was working at the time.

• 1:19:35Speaker 05

  And I just started thinking about what was recorded as we left our house. We lived in Arlington, not too far at the time, from Clarendon Metro. We walked with our suitcases across a few streets down to Clarendon Metro. I counted probably 25 cameras on the way to the metro. We get in the metro, there's cameras, I'm sure there's microphones, there's Wi-Fi. We get on the train, there's cameras. We paid to get on the train, so that's recorded, right? We get to Union Station, we go in Union Station, we grab a bite to eat. I paid cash.

• 1:20:19Speaker 05

  My daughter, when she was younger, thought I was part of The Sopranos, because I carried cash all the time. And try and pay cash now. In most places that you go to, you'll find it's very difficult. I think something like...

• 1:20:37Speaker 05

  Only 2% of all transactions in the United States are cash now. I read that again, correct me on the Google if that's incorrect. But most of what you pay for right now, you don't pay for in cash. You use electronic means. That's all recorded immediately. One moment that struck me more than any other, more than getting on the train up to New York is, we get to Penn Station in New York and I use my credit card because the machine wasn't taking cash. I used my credit card to buy two subway cards so that we could go up to my daughter's apartment, which was about 50 blocks north.

• 1:21:18Speaker 05

  When I put the credit card in the machine, I immediately got a text message on my phone from the credit card company saying, "Hey, are you trying to buy two tickets at the same time?" Because that was weird for them, that stood out. Right. You should buy one. Also, you're in Washington, why are you buying subway tickets in New York? Now, that was immediate. I'm scared if that happens to me five years later. That was immediate. That somebody, in an automated sense, knew where I was, what I was doing, how much money I was spending, how I was traveling, where I was going at every single moment. Now, I don't think I have to reveal anything about the intelligence implications for you and the listeners Sure.

• 1:22:03Speaker 05

  to understand what that means about trying to be in secret. I would have my kids, just as an exercise in protecting their own privacy, watch a TV show and say, "What are all the things that are giving away this person's location and activities at this time?" Right? Look at a car right now that has 2,000 to 3,000, if it's a sophisticated EV, maybe more, a microprocessors in it collecting data on you, taking pictures of where you're going and taking pictures of the inside of the car. It knows your weight on the seat. It listens to all your conversations. That has huge implications for people who tried to meet in secret.

• 1:22:47Speaker 05

  And the most serious of those is it has stolen the immediacy of time from intelligence operators. And let me put that another way, if I wanted to meet Jack secretly in 1990, I would I would ditch my cellphone if I even had one. I would have no electronics on me. I would make sure I wasn't on any camera. There wouldn't be any cameras, really, there wouldn't be too many. I'd make sure nobody was following me. I'd make sure Jack did the same thing. We'd have our meeting, I would go home, he'd go home. I'd relax, pour myself a bourbon, and know that my operation succeeded.

• 1:23:32Speaker 05

  Ubiquitous technical surveillance has changed that.

• 1:23:34Speaker 03

  Mm hmm.

• 1:23:36Speaker 05

  I have no idea, after I get home and Jack gets home, how much of that was recorded.

• 1:23:43Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:23:44Speaker 05

  If I walk out of my house without my cellphone,

• 1:23:49Speaker 05

  uh, someone who's interested in me is gonna know that. Because as one tech executive told me, the only people who don't carry cellphones are drug dealers, undercover cops, and intelligence officers.

• 1:24:05Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:24:05Speaker 05

  Maybe also infants, but they're getting younger and younger on that as well.

• 1:24:09Speaker 03

  Yeah. Well, and the other thing is, you know, like, early 2000s, like, when you're talking about biometrics and facial recognition, all you had to worry about was was like Vegas and Heathrow, right?

• 1:24:22Speaker 05

  Right, right.

• 1:24:23Speaker 03

  And now you can go online to like, you know, Pym Eyes or whatever, and gain access to, you know, near-intelligence level or law enforcement level facial recognition. Stuff.

• 1:24:38Speaker 05

  Well, exactly.

• 1:24:41Speaker 05

  You have no idea, when you cross a border, particularly an airport, you're going through

• 1:24:53Speaker 05

  hundreds of meters of collection.

• 1:24:56Speaker 05

  Wi-Fi collection, cell site simulators, iris scanners,

• 1:25:04Speaker 05

  facial recognition. They've done all these experiments, the news has done all these experiments on the age of commercial economic surveillance, where they demonstrate this. And then you have, of course, these sites like PIMIs where you can go and and look somebody up and the days of trying to look like Marlon Brando by stuffing cotton in your mouth.

• 1:25:29Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:25:30Speaker 05

  Those are over. If they can do facial recognition while you're wearing a medical mask,

• 1:25:37Speaker 05

  that's not a chance that I would want to take.

• 1:25:39Speaker 03

  You know, and the other thing is, is it, you know, when you talk about aliases and that kind of stuff and, you know, and we've had like ATF guys on and they talked about the alias process and aging their accounts and things like that. How do you, how do you age a Facebook account? How do you age us? Like, how does, you know, sure, somebody's got a credit card that has, you know, 10 or 15 year history so that it's not a brand new card, but then they don't have any social media presence?

• 1:26:11Speaker 05

  Yeah, I don't, I don't, I don't know the answer to that. I really don't.

• 1:26:17Speaker 05

  A really good point, based off of that, is the difference, I think, in the approach recommended on social media for people who join the IC. It used to be when I joined

• 1:26:35Speaker 05

  the agency, nobody had Facebook, nobody had

• 1:26:41Speaker 05

  InstaFace, I'm joking, Instagram, any of that stuff.

• 1:26:46Speaker 05

  I think

• 1:26:49Speaker 05

  that made sense when it first came out. Because it was new. But if you're purporting to be one thing and you're another thing, and the first thing is normal, people of that age, say, coming out of college or graduate school now in their mid twenties or early thirties, they're gonna have a significant social media presence. And you can't, you can't backdate that. You have to look like what you are. I would, I would argue now that cover is dead. And that you have to operate in the real. And that adds all kinds of implications.

• 1:27:31Jack Murphy?

  That's a very like interesting concept, like not traveling under alias, you're gonna have to be you. And not say that you're an intelligence officer probably, but I am an American citizen, I have this real name. And you're gonna have to approach people like that.

• 1:27:48Speaker 05

  Yeah, I don't want to get too much into it, but I just think that the old, the old, the old ways of doing things where you went to a building where there's a record of you going to that building. And you have a bunch of colleagues and it's a, there's a record of where those colleagues work. You can do work in that regard, there's tasks that you can do with that identity, but you have to understand that identity is, if not known, knowable.

• 1:28:18Jack Murphy?

  Right, right.

• 1:28:19Speaker 05

  And that is very limiting, that's very challenging. So for the, what, what we had to figure out, what they have to figure out is, how do you do that job where anybody who, who goes to that building, who has a record doing that work, or has a cohort, a population cohort, who does that work?

• 1:28:51Speaker 05

  How do you work against the most challenging targets?

• 1:28:55Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:28:55Speaker 05

  In that regard? There's ways to do it. You can, you just have to think very, very hard and that's, that's what their job is. Is it takes, it takes things that you could plan in a few days? And makes them things that you have to take a few months to do.

• 1:29:12Speaker 03

  Do you think that the US, uh, not just from a personal privacy or, or anything like that, but from a security and intelligence standpoint would benefit from something like Europe's like GDPRP? You know, the privacy portability stuff and being able to erase your online, um, presence, basically?

• 1:29:34Speaker 05

  Yeah, that's another, that's another consumer economic, uh, question that it's got obvious intelligence, uh, implications. I, I'm skeptical about how much we can put back in the bag.

• 1:29:47Speaker 03

  Uh huh.

• 1:29:48Speaker 05

  It's out. My view, just as a, a citizen concerned with privacy, tends to

• 1:29:58Speaker 05

  lean towards the European view. You, it's ironic that, that people who stole secrets for a living, uh, in the central intelligence agency are the most privacy focused people I've ever met.

• 1:30:12Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:30:13Speaker 05

  Um, my, my kids think I'm nuts. Um, and again, I, I have accounts and, um, I'm on the internets now. I'm not a hermit. I tend to be probably less out there than some people, but there are others who are far more restrictive than I am. I just think that our data is ours. And it doesn't belong to a third company or a second company.

• 1:30:41Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:30:42Speaker 05

  And, and the idea that somebody can make money on my data without my permission strikes me as just wrong. Um, but that was our first, that was our first principle, right? When we started this back in the bad old late nineties and early two thousands, that was the model. What really drives me crazy, I'll tell you without naming, uh, the, the newspaper company is I pay a subscription to a newspaper so that I can read it online and they still collect and sell my data.

• 1:31:12Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:31:12Speaker 05

  I thought I paid a subscription, so I didn't have to do that.

• 1:31:15Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:31:16Speaker 05

  And I think everybody would be better off, not just the intelligence community, if we could ratchet that back so that we had a model that was not based on third, third parties owning our, our data.

• 1:31:34Speaker 03

  Do you have an opinion about, you know, not necessarily 23andMe specifically because of what they've recently gone through, but, but for instance, I'm adopted. I've always been curious about my heritage. I don't know anything about my biological parents, but I never wanted to do one of those test kits because they never guaranteed the privacy of your information. And now basically, not only with that, but also with, you know, the pregnancy testing, a lot of that is Chinese owned, you know, things like that, that they have DNA samples of everybody.

• 1:32:13Speaker 05

  Yeah. Yeah. It's only gonna get worse.

• 1:32:19Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:32:20Speaker 05

  The capability for collecting that data and for stealing that data, right? How many days can you go without a story about a Russian or a Chinese hack of patient data from a hospital or a study or some sort of healthcare facility? The information that is available on all of us is terrifying when it's all aggregated and the ability to get it depends really only on the amount of money and effort that those who want to acquire.

• 1:33:02Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the Food Allergy Podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel. People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic, in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood. And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more, because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still

• 1:33:46Speaker 00

  Having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At The Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At The Table and start listening on the free iHeart radio app today. Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds up to $200,000 right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat with flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment. Get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 1:34:30Speaker 05

  I heard are willing to put in. So, and I happen to think that it's as dangerous to have private companies have your data, guys, as it is foreign governments. And in many cases, they're the same. I mean, when you, when you look at these, these companies in China, they're all subject to direction from the Communist Party of China. So when you talk about a private company in China, you're really not talking about a private company like you are in the United States.

• 1:35:00Speaker 05

  Companies don't suffer really any great sanction or fine for mishandling data. I think the thing that I love about GDPR is it's got teeth. And from my conversations with people in the tech industry in the United States, they'll hire 50 people to comply with GDPR because the highest fine that GDPR imposes on companies that violate its regulations is 5% of total annual revenue. Yeah. That's billions of dollars for a company like Google, or billions of dollars. The fines for, for

• 1:35:47Speaker 05

  from the SEC and other regulators in the United States are peanuts. They're in the millions. Yeah. Of dollars. I mean, if you look and see fines on telecoms for data breaches, I think I got out a calculator once and it was 0.0003%. It's token. Yeah. Well, and even with the private company, I mean, Jack and I were both subject to the OPM breach, which, uh, or two breaches, I guess. Yeah, right. Everybody who had a security clearance, you know, all of a sudden, there goes all of our data. And like, you know, that those SF86s and those forms are not, they're not shallow.

• 1:36:30Speaker 05

  Correct. Correct. And, and, and it would be bad enough if these were one-off events, but we're giving up all that data every single day. Yeah. Every time we go on the computer, every time, uh, we use our apps, every time we travel, every time we get in a car. I mean, if you look, if you look at what, what's collected on you in modern cars, it's, it, it makes a cellphone look like, uh, makes a cellphone look like a Dixie cup connected with a string. So, so, nobody has to, again, one of my favorite quotations is from a,

• 1:37:10Speaker 05

  from a guy who writes about this name, Mike Yegly, uh, who says, "I didn't hack your data. I didn't steal it. I didn't intercept it. I bought it."

• 1:37:21Speaker 05

  As I, as I'm given to understand, both the Chinese government and the Russian government can buy data as well as, as anybody else. Yeah. And get that information that's, that's on all of us. And if you think about that in terms of particular military units, if you think about that in terms of particular officers, if you think about that in terms of known and unknown intelligence officers, it's, it's really quite a challenge for us to operate without our adversaries knowing what we're doing. Yeah. Well, yeah. Where are you driving to every morning, uh, you know, and, and from? Uh, and you, I mean, even.

• 1:38:03Speaker 03

  Wasn't it the New York Times that did that article, Jack, on they bought the they bought the information on the Secret Service and were able to track the movements, the Secret Service and the movements of the president?

• 1:38:19Speaker 05

  Yes. Yeah, the New York Times has done a number of those those commercial

• 1:38:25Speaker 05

  intelligence studies. And I I remember just having a conversation

• 1:38:31Speaker 05

  with a with a tech exec a few months ago.

• 1:38:37Speaker 05

  He said, yeah, I don't know how you guys do what you do anymore, because I can I in my company alone can tell you where you live, what kind of car you drive, what your license plate is, what your VIN number is.

• 1:38:53Speaker 05

  I mean, I remember somebody who worked in the the tradecraft comes into the office one morning and told me its car announced to her as she pulled into the agency now pulling into CIA headquarters.

• 1:39:11Speaker 05

  Again, I think I I think it's any car after 2003 is collecting data on you. 2025, it's a lot of data on you. I made a tongue in cheek recommendation one time as as Chief of Tradecraft that all COs should be issued a their choice of a 1968 Camaro, 66 Mustang, 72 GTO.

• 1:39:43Speaker 05

  My my my counterparts in the DS and T said, yeah, that would solve that problem, but you might stand out

• 1:39:52Speaker 05

  or just because of your choice of car. And I said, well, we need to get these for for everybody in government and sprinkle them around the world as well. I was I was joking, but you can't go back. You can't go back to. To a non-data, non-compute, non-censor environment, you have to figure out how to operate in those terms. I do think, to your earlier point, you could change laws and regulations so that the companies that have our data take its protection a lot more seriously.

• 1:40:27Jack Murphy?

  Right.

• 1:40:28Speaker 05

  Because right now, they don't. And it's what one of my friends calls "security theater." They pretend to guard the data, and the government pretends to find them.

• 1:40:38Jack Murphy?

  So you retired in 2019, went into the private sector, and took this knowledge, and this skill set into the private sector to help corporations defend against Russia and China and other potential threats. Could you tell us a little bit about, sort of like, what the difference was as far as going from government to private sector? And, I mean, the threats are still there? Or were they different? And how you defend against them? Were they different?

• 1:41:05Speaker 05

  Yeah, it's a hard question to answer. First thing is, I didn't take any particular knowledge with me to the private sector. The private sector has more knowledge about ubiquitous technical surveillance and its capabilities.

• 1:41:20Jack Murphy?

  Because I knew it.

• 1:41:23Speaker 05

  Hands down, the private sector was the teacher, and the government was the student when it came to UTS. You name any of the big... It's not just any of the big... Hundreds of companies, not just Google and Amazon and Facebook and Apple and Microsoft, hundreds of companies are much more sophisticated in their ability to track and know what people are doing with those commercial tools than the United States government is. And I would debate somebody in any setting on that. So, really, I started learning that when I was still in government, that the experts on this are in the private sector.

• 1:42:10Speaker 05

  What I took to the private sector was a mindset, not any particular knowledge, because I think the private sector was really good on the technology and the techniques and the threats of the technology and the techniques. What I took from government was my understanding that China and Russia and North Korea and Iran and other state actors are attacking the US private sector. And they don't make a distinction between private sector information and government information. They want it all, particularly China, which is the apex predator in this space.

• 1:42:52Speaker 05

  It's responsible for something over 80%, probably closer to 90% of the thefts. There is no meaningful distinction between the government of China and Chinese companies when it comes to theft, for example, of trade secrets and other IP. Those companies are obligated to supply whatever aid and information the CCP wants through Article 17, or the 2017 Article 7 of its Intelligence Act and other legal requirements. So this idea that we're the private sector, we're safe, we're too small, we're too esoteric,

• 1:43:37Speaker 05

  nobody wants to steal from us, that's something that I can say, hey, read this FBI circular, it's public, this is not secret information. Keith Alexander was talking about this 20 years ago, and nobody was listening, that the private sector is, as much as the government, a target of commercial, of espionage, as the government is. Commercial espionage, governmental espionage, it's espionage. Right. The second thing that was really astounding to me was how uninterested the private sector was in this, and it took me a while to figure that out.

• 1:44:21Speaker 05

  And what I learned was...

• 1:44:26Speaker 05

  Because they weren't looking at it, they weren't working at detecting it. Because they weren't detecting it, they weren't reporting it. Because they weren't reporting it, nobody knew the scale. So imagine, guys, you live in a neighborhood in which every house is being burgled every day for a significant portion of its total net worth. But nobody detects it because it's information, not stuff. And they won't learn about the loss of that value for some weeks, months, or years. So they don't detect it, they don't report it. Because it's not being detected or reported, everybody else thinks the neighborhood's safe. So they're all leaving their doors and windows unlocked.

• 1:45:08Speaker 05

  So it keeps going on, and it's this vicious cycle that really struck me. And so one of the things we've worked on is trying to improve the ability of companies to detect theft, to track where their IP is, to look to see if there's an unknown competitor who's got a product out based on their IP, and then to value that theft, and then to report it. And we still have a long way to go on that because companies regard that kind of business counterintelligence, business security, as a cost center, not as a revenue generator.

• 1:45:47Speaker 05

  I believe if they understood the actual level of theft, they would change their minds. For example, we think, based on a very cursory examination of data, that the losses are in the trillions, not the hundreds of billions, as the FBI reports. So, I mean, I'm happy to go into that more if you want.

• 1:46:14Jack Murphy?

  Yeah, it's interesting because, I mean, my thought would have been that corporations are very protective of their proprietary data. And like if me or you were to approach somebody who works at Google, like, hey, can you share your source code with me or whatever, they're gonna be like, hell no, that's protected information.

• 1:46:32Speaker 05

  Okay, Jack, now imagine you have fifty people calling fifty people at Google. Yeah. Calling them up on the phone and some of them are real customers, but that's not their main job, or they're calling up a company and pretending to be an investor, or they're real investors, or they're a supplier, or they're a contractor. We've done experiments like this where we call people on the phone and ask for information, and they give it to us.

• 1:47:06Speaker 05

  They have policies and procedures in place. I just don't think that most companies are very good at them. I think some of the bigger ones are better. I think, again, not every company can afford a security shop. Not every company can afford to hire experts to advise them on how best to protect their IP. A lot of companies convince themselves, "We're too small, so we're immune to this. Nobody would be interested." A lot of companies we've seen, "Oh, I hired this guy. He was my friend. Sure, of course. I knew he was a PRC citizen, but we went to college together."

• 1:47:51Speaker 05

  And then they're shocked when this person downloads all the IP onto a couple of drives and gets on a plane and starts an identical company outside of Shanghai, which is a real case that I'm citing. So I think that the private sector has a long way to go. I mean, in most cases, the private sector doesn't do a great job of even valuing its IP. It's tough to value, so they don't put it on the balance sheet. So if you're not doing that, if you're not tracking it to see if other companies, particularly outside the United States, are making products like yours or pirating yours, it's difficult to track.

• 1:48:35Speaker 05

  There was a case we found out about. Uh, this wasn't the United States, it was Australia. Where uh, s- somebody called up the headquarters. And complaining about a product breaking. And headquarters uh, got the unit number, the identity code. Off the particular product, it was a metal detector. And said, we don't have that code. And so they started peeling back the onion and found out. They didn't make the metal detector, even though it was their IP.

• 1:49:06Speaker 03

  Oh.

• 1:49:07Speaker 05

  A, an entire Chinese company was stood up. Uh, the company's called Codan, this was in the press. Um, was, was stood up to pirate their, their IP. Um, and if they hadn't gotten this call, this would have got, so they lost all their China revenue.

• 1:49:23Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 1:49:23Speaker 05

  To this, this pirate. So this is the kind of thing that we're really interested in and, and. Less people think, oh gosh, this is just going into business. This has nothing to do with national security. I would respectfully suggest they're wrong. This is, this is the battle.

• 1:49:42Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:49:43Speaker 05

  Right, this is how, that Russia and China attacked the United States via our private sector. This is hybrid warfare. This, this isn't just preparation for some sort of traditional kinetic uh, contest. In the South China Sea. This is how China degrades the United States.

• 1:50:05Speaker 03

  It's also, you know, i- in, in a lot of ways, it's also in, in uh. An economic issue that the government is gonna have to figure out because. When the companies, especially the smaller companies, when they, when they get breached. So I, I did a short stint like eight months working for a digital forensics company and. When these companies get breached, they hire attorneys. Uh, who let them, who, who then hire a, a forensics company. To find out what their liability is to. You know, uh, anybody who may have been in their database or whatever. So they're paying these companies hourly.

• 1:50:49Speaker 03

  You know, to figure out, uh, what did they access? Uh, and what is their liability? That's all they wanna know. So, you know, there was one case where we found a threat actor that had never been reported on. You know, they were doing the dark web, you know, um, negotiations with them. And this, and, and there were, but they don't, they don't want to know the TTPs and we're not getting paid. You know, the company isn't going to take on that. Hey, let's pay these guys an hourly or whatever to figure out all the TTPs of this new thing. What are the reporting channels of it?

• 1:51:32Speaker 03

  All these other things. So basically it, it dies. Once that company knows, what did they touch? What did they exfil? You know, maybe how did they get in? Like, are we still compromised? And that's it.

• 1:51:48Speaker 03

  It just dies.

• 1:51:50Speaker 05

  Exactly. Their, their concern is, uh, liability and compliance.

• 1:51:56Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:51:57Speaker 05

  It's not security.

• 1:51:59Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:51:59Speaker 05

  And it's not prevention.

• 1:52:01Speaker 03

  And these forensic companies, they're not going to pay out of pocket to keep, you know, to keep their guys on the clock to figure it all out.

• 1:52:09Speaker 05

  Correct. That's what, that's not, that's, that's not the mission.

• 1:52:13Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:52:13Speaker 05

  Of the company. And it's, and it's, and it's not its, uh, it's not its model. And so the, the, one of the tragedies here is none of that information is shared.

• 1:52:24Speaker 03

  Correct.

• 1:52:25Speaker 05

  None of that information is, if you're lucky enough to detect the breach in the first case,

• 1:52:34Speaker 05

  very few companies then take the next step to report that. They don't report it to law enforcement. They don't, they don't report it to regulators. They don't report it to the press. They have a, now in cyber, they have a material obligation, they have a legal obligation to report cyber breaches, uh, because of recent laws. However, my understanding is the way the law is written, it says if it has a material effect on the value to investors. Well, how many times can we say, we don't think that has a material effect?

• 1:53:18Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:53:19Speaker 05

  And when I've had conversations, again, not naming anybody's name or company, what I've had conversations with many security officers.

• 1:53:27Speaker 05

  They say, oh heavens, no, we're not, we're not reporting a breach. We're not reporting a suspected breach. We're not reporting a suspected insider. That's just gonna result in questions.

• 1:53:40Speaker 03

  It's embarrassing for them.

• 1:53:42Speaker 05

  Difficulties with our investors.

• 1:53:43Speaker 03

  Yeah, yeah. And, and generally, I mean, a lot of times, they don't even know they've been breached until it pops up on some dark, you know, on some, you know, breach forum with the data for sale.

• 1:53:57Speaker 05

  Right. And even then, it could be months or longer. And many of these companies are not hiring or doing themselves the due diligence to check the deep and dark web.

• 1:54:10Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:54:10Speaker 05

  To see if that data is missing, to see if their IP is for sale, to see any of that information. So, no one's, no one's checking competitors to see if they're selling exactly the same IP. They're worried about themselves.

• 1:54:27Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:54:28Speaker 05

  And I, I think, I think this is not just a a legal compliance issue. It's not just a security issue. I think it's a national security issue because it's degrading the US industrial base.

• 1:54:43Speaker 03

  Do you, do you feel as though the United States, because I agree with you, I feel like this is a form of asymmetrical warfare?

• 1:54:51Speaker 05

  It is.

• 1:54:52Speaker 03

  And that our government needs to treat it as such, that they need to stop looking at it as a criminal act? And as, and more as a, as a type of warfare? Do, do you think that the government, do you think, first off, do you think that that is a little overboard, my, you know, my

• 1:55:15Speaker 05

  I don't.

• 1:55:15Speaker 03

  opinion on it? And do you think that the government would ever catch up with that idea? That, you know, maybe one of these, you know,

• 1:55:25Speaker 05

  APTs needs to get a hellfire. And it might change the dynamics. It is, it is, I think, the question right now on how the United States responds to really what has been a at least a two-decade-long assault by certainly China and Russia, also now North Korea and occasionally Iran, but certainly China and Russia. Every week are attacking US infrastructure, US companies, US people, US finances,

• 1:56:11Speaker 05

  using a variety of means, not just cyber, but human, predatory finance, a variety of a variety of means to degrade, steal, and infiltrate US infrastructure. And the point that undergirds your larger point about warfare is that essentially China and Russia, via their methodology, have boiled the frog. And we've just realized it. Yeah. Because what they've done has been, and professionally, one has to respect what they've done

• 1:56:57Speaker 05

  as we detest it

• 1:57:00Speaker 05

  and call for action. If this had been done kinetically, we would be at war. Right. They have shut down healthcare. They have shut down transfers of energy. They've shut down pipelines. They have shut down electrical grids. They are infiltrated. They've shut down telecom. They have infiltrated every single part of the infrastructure. They have stolen trillions of dollars of value of US assets. And because they have done it

• 1:57:35Speaker 05

  incrementally, slowly, quietly,

• 1:57:42Speaker 05

  stealthily, and via so-called private

• 1:57:49Speaker 05

  plausibly deniable methods, they've gotten away with it. But, but nobody in the government believes that APT 41 or any of these other Fancy Bear or any of these other actors is operating without the support.

• 1:58:06Speaker 03

  Right, or, or at least the task and approval.

• 1:58:11Speaker 03

  Right.

• 1:58:12Speaker 05

  Russia and China could shut down these groups immediately if they wanted to.

• 1:58:15Speaker 03

  Right, right.

• 1:58:17Speaker 05

  And, and I think we've, I think we've shown publicly that in both cases, these groups are operating not just with the tacit support, but in many cases at the behest of their governments.

• 1:58:32Speaker 03

  Yeah. Do you, uh, do you get a sense that the government? Because, you know, the, the ransomware, the, the breaches, the stealing, like, that's the stuff that we see.

• 1:58:47Speaker 05

  Right.

• 1:58:47Speaker 03

  But, but we also know that,

• 1:58:53Speaker 03

  you know, you know, if we look at the solar wind stuff, like, that's the stuff that we see. But a, but a smart intelligence operation, it's the stuff that you don't see. I mean, are, do you, are, are they concerned that they're in, they're in the systems and they're just not moving? They're not doing anything where it's critical?

• 1:59:14Speaker 05

  You can play in government systems.

• 1:59:15Speaker 03

  Yes. Are they just sitting there?

• 1:59:18Speaker 05

  Yeah, I don't, I don't know the answer to that. I certainly believe they would be fine.

• 1:59:22Speaker 03

  And I'm not asking you if, if you think they are, but what I'm asking you is, do you get a sense that the government is looking at this in a sense of like, you know, what we see, we're like, we're worried about what we see. But what is it that we don't see?

• 1:59:41Speaker 03

  That we really need to be concerned with?

• 1:59:43Speaker 05

  I think CISA and the FBI and, and the other commerce, the other actors who are involved in this well-recognize that we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg. This is, this is about this comment about. Um, the private sector believes that it's a couple of hundred billion dollars worth of theft. It's, it's in the trillions.

• 2:00:07Jack Murphy?

  Yeah.

• 2:00:08Speaker 05

  So people report 220 to 600 billion dollars a year in, uh, losses from, uh, Chinese theft of IP alone. We think that's 5.7 trillion dollars. And, and the reason we think that, and the reason the FBI believes it's a lot bigger than what it sees is

• 2:00:29Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel. People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic. In a big way that defined a lot of my childhood. And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more, because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat.

• 2:01:12Speaker 00

  It's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At the Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At the Table and start listening on the free iHeart radio app today. OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 help make it happen fast. Rated A plus by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 2:01:55Speaker 05

  Point that I mentioned just a few minutes ago, which is these companies are not detecting.

• 2:02:00Jack Murphy?

  Right.

• 2:02:01Speaker 05

  Reporting everything that happens to them. The FBI is very good on this. I mean, they know that they're only seeing a portion of what's happening. And they're really trying to get the private sector to cooperate. The FBI doesn't have the authorities to do pre-crime.

• 2:02:19Jack Murphy?

  Right. Yeah.

• 2:02:21Speaker 05

  We have a Fourth Amendment. That's a good thing. I support that. We all support that. Constitution of the United States. That's great.

• 2:02:29Speaker 05

  The FBI also has, I think, last time I checked, 10,100 special agents to cover the entire United States. All of its missions, including these attacks on the private sector from Russia and China via hacking and other methods of infiltrating infrastructure and stealing IP and stealing data. So there's no way you could triple the FBI budget, which I would support, and you still wouldn't come close. Which means that in this national security contest

• 2:03:12Speaker 05

  between the United States and its adversaries, Russia and China, the private sector are participants, and they need to understand that. They don't, in many cases, understand that. They say, "Whoa, our job is to make widgets," or whatever it might be. "We have a great knowledgeable, cheap labor force in China, and we have a great research relationship with China, and we have a lot of buyers in China." Okay, fair enough, but you understand that each one of those relationships also imposes a risk of loss on those companies. And I think you start to see that.

• 2:03:53Speaker 05

  So, for example, Apple iPhone sales are declining precipitously. Chinese EVs are the number one selling EVs. I think these companies from the United States that did business in China traded short-term profits and revenue for a lot of long-term pain. And that's not to say that everybody can keep IP secret forever, but we don't hand it over willy-nilly to two countries that are basically dedicated to the destruction of the United States. Right. These are, by the way...

• 2:04:38Speaker 05

  I shouldn't have to say, none of us should have to say, it's different doing business with a country like France and Canada and Mexico and Great Britain, who don't have nuclear weapons pointed at us.

• 2:04:52Speaker 03

  Right.

• 2:04:53Speaker 05

  From doing business with China and Russia, who do.

• 2:04:56Speaker 03

  Or even India, like, you know.

• 2:04:58Speaker 05

  Right.

• 2:04:59Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 2:05:01Jack Murphy?

  Glenn, where can people go to find you if they want to procure your services, so to speak? Uh, where would they go?

• 2:05:09Speaker 05

  Yeah, thanks for asking. I, my main gig right now is, uh, I am the director of 2430 Group. And 2430 Group is a nonprofit research, educational and advisory, uh, institution. We do research on these questions, uh, some of it very, very detailed. We do advise companies on this. We're a nonprofit. Uh, we want to make sure that everybody is aware that there is a significant overlap between,

• 2:05:43Speaker 05

  uh, the financial, uh, business interests of the US private sector and the national security of the United States. They are not, they are not unrelated and they're not at cross purposes. And, uh, one of our, one of our taglines that we use all the time is, "Counterintelligence is good business." "You, you as a business will do well." Um, so if you don't contact me at 2430 Group, there's others who do this. Contact somebody and learn what your vulnerabilities are, how to assess those, and, uh, how to mitigate.

• 2:06:22Jack Murphy?

  And you're a, uh, social media skeptic, it sounds like, but are you on LinkedIn, places like that?

• 2:06:27Speaker 05

  I am on LinkedIn. I have, I have made my, I have made my compromises with Modernity, guys. Uh, it's the only one I'm on. Uh, I'm not on any of the others, uh, because I think professionally, it's, it's really required.

• 2:06:45Jack Murphy?

  Dee, do we have any questions for Glenn? No. Okay. Um, no, so that's, that's pretty much it, unless you had anything else, um, that jumps out at you, things that you'd really like to talk about before we get going today?

• 2:06:58Speaker 05

  No, I, I, guys, I wanna, I wanna thank you for having me on. And as you can tell, I really am very enthusiastic about this topic of how our adversaries weaponize data and commercial espionage to attack the United States. And I think anybody who's listening, who's in the private sector, who hasn't thought about these issues, I really appreciate that you guys give some attention to it.

• 2:07:30Jack Murphy?

  Yeah, absolutely. And thank you for coming on the show tonight. Yeah, we really appreciate it.

• 2:07:36Speaker 05

  Thanks, guys.

• 2:07:37Jack Murphy?

  And we'll have some links down in the description for folks out there who want to get in touch with Glenn and see some of his work. So you guys can check that out. And otherwise, we'll see all of you next week.

• 2:07:54Jack Murphy?

  Hey, guys, it's Jack. I just want to talk to you for a moment about how you can support the show. If you've been watching it, enjoying it, but you'd like to get a little bit more involved and help us continue to do this. You can check out our Patreon. It is patreon.com/the team house. And for $5 a month, you can get access to all of these episodes of The Team House ad free. The same goes with our affiliated podcast, Eyes On, with Andy Milburn, Jason Lyons, McMulroy. That one, you will also get all of those episodes ad free. And you support the channel and the show, and we really appreciate it. The Patreon members are literally what has helped this company, this small business, survive,

• 2:08:37Jack Murphy?

  especially during our early years. And you are what continues to help this thing going, even as we navigate the turbulent world of YouTube advertising. So we really appreciate all of you guys. There's going to be a link down in the description to that Patreon page. And there is also going to be a link to our new merch shop. So if you guys want to go and get some Team House merchandise, we got stickers. And we also have patches. And I should mention, if you sign up for-

• 2:09:06Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we- Hear stories from real people like Daniel. People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood. And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you are not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table.

• 2:09:51Speaker 00

  Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At The Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At The Table and start listening on the free iHeart radio app today.

• 2:10:03Speaker 02

  Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover, seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 2:10:33Jack Murphy?

  Patreon at $10 a month, we will mail you this patch as well.

• 2:10:38Jack Murphy?

  So we really appreciate that. But they're also for sale on the merch shop. And additionally, they got t-shirts up there, water bottles.

• 2:10:47Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Ashkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At The Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel. People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood. And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you are not alone. One of the best guys that I dated. He made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table.

• 2:11:32Speaker 00

  Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At The Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow At The Table and start listening on the free iHeart radio app today.

• 2:11:44Speaker 02

  Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds up to $200,000 right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 2:12:14Jack Murphy?

  Tote bag, coffee mugs, all that good stuff. So please go and check them out and support the show. We really appreciate it, guys. Thank you.

• 2:12:31Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At The Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel.

• 2:12:45Speaker 02

  People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood.

• 2:12:56Speaker 00

  And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat. It's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At The Table, the food allergy podcast on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow at the table and start listening on the free iHeart Radio app today. Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds up to $200,000 right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll,

• 2:13:37Speaker 00

  restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 2:14:12Speaker 00

  Hi, I'm Jenna Oshkowitz. You might know me from Glee. This is At the Table, the food allergy podcast, a show about food, connection, and what it really looks like to live with food allergies. Each episode, we hear stories from real people like Daniel.

• 2:14:27Speaker 01

  People would always think I was lactose intolerant, so I just kind of shortened my explanation to I'm deathly allergic, in a big way that defined a lot of my childhood.

• 2:14:38Speaker 00

  And while there are challenges, there are moments that remind you you're not alone. One of the best guys that I dated, he made a point to memorize all my food allergies. So join us and hear their stories and more, because living with food allergies isn't just about what you can't eat, it's about still having your seat at the table. Brought to you by Genentech and Novartis. Listen to At the Table, the food allergy podcast, on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Follow at the table and start listening on the free iHeart Radio app today.

• 2:15:09Speaker 00

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 help make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star Trust Pilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval. She's been thinking about this sleepover all week, but I think about her food allergies all the time. Fortunately, her doctor prescribed Zolair, omalizumab. It's proven to significantly reduce allergic reactions if a food allergy accident happens.

• 2:15:51Speaker 01

  Zolair 150mg is a prescription medication used to treat food allergy in people one year of age and older to reduce allergic reactions due to accidental exposure to one or more foods. While taking Zolair, you should continue to avoid all foods to which you are allergic. Don't use if you are allergic to Zolair. Zolair may cause a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction called anaphylaxis. Tell your doctor if you ever had anaphylaxis. Get help right away if you have trouble breathing or if you have swelling of your throat or tongue. Zolair should not be used for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Zolair is for maintenance use to reduce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, while avoiding food allergens. Serious side effects such as cancer, fever, muscle aches and rash, parasitic infection, or heart and circulation problems have been reported. Please see zolair.com for full prescribing information. Ask an allergist about Zolair. This is an advertisement for Zolair,

• 2:16:36Speaker 01

  paid for by Genentech and Novartis.

• 2:16:38Speaker 00

  Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.