The Sporting Class: MLB and ESPN's Divorce

Major League Baseball just opted out of its $550 million contract with the Worldwide Leader. But are we still underestimating the fundamental value of the game? Why would a network sign a broadcast-rights deal in the first place, if you can just put crap on TV? And is Kyle Kuzma actually more popular than Aaron Judge? Plus: Netflix, Victor Wemminyamma, David Samson in union-boss mode, John Skipper's Chocolate-Chip Cookie Theory — and the fan of this show who is consuming it on mushrooms. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Pablo Torre?

  This episode is brought to you by Apollo.io. A lot of the stories on this show start the same way. Something that looks pretty simple turns out to be a mess once you look under the hood. Well, it's no different in the sales world. Your team has a tool for finding prospects, a different tool for reaching out to them, and a third for keeping track of it all. On paper, that's a system. In practice, it's a salesperson spending the better part of the day copying names from one tab into another and not much of it actually selling. Apollo.io is a platform that helps sales teams find the right buyers and reach out to them. It brings prospecting, outreach, and follow-up into one place instead of several separate tools. It's used by sales teams of all sizes,

• 0:44Pablo Torre?

  from small businesses to larger organizations, and it's built for teams who want less manual busy work and more time with buyers. If your marketing and sales teams are trying to work from the same view of the customer, it's worth a look. Sign up for free at Apollo.io. That's Apollo.io.

• 1:02Speaker 01

  Onnit's Black Friday sale doesn't start until later this month, but listeners get in early. If you're new to Onnit, go to Onnit.com and use code PABLO for 30% off your first order starting today. If you've never tried Onnit, start with AlphaBrain. It's their daily nootropic built to support focus, memory, and mental clarity on days when you need to be locked in, whether that's powering through a tough workout or staying focused during back-to-back meetings. Get early access and save 30% off your first order at Onnit.com. That's O-N-N-I-T dot com. And use code PABLO. Some exclusions apply.

• 1:48Pablo Torre?

  This episode of Pablo Torre Finds Out is brought to you by McDonald's. The Quarter Pounder with Cheese with Medium Fries and a Drink is now $8. And look, I've chased down a lot of strange stories, but nothing quite like what's inside a Quarter Pounder with Cheese. It is 100% fresh beef cooked right when you order it with no artificial flavors, colors, fillers, or preservatives in the beef. The onions are hand-topped by someone who knows the perfect amount by memory, two slices of cheese and a star, and two pickles side by side. So every bite gets both. And every time one's ordered, a cowbell sound rings in the kitchen. That's the grill master's cue to put a fresh patty on the grill. My move?

• 2:30Pablo Torre?

  QPC, fries and a drink after a long day of recording. That is my happy place. The Quarter Pounder with Cheese with Fries and a Drink, now $8 for a limited time only, only at McDonald's. For a limited time only. Prices and participation may vary. Prices may be higher in Hawaii, Alaska and California, and for delivery. Fresh beef not available in Alaska and Hawaii. Offer not valid for delivery. Welcome to Pablo Torre Finds Out. I am Pablo Torre, and today, we're gonna find out what this sound is.

• 3:02Speaker 02

  Whatever, whatever, whatever. God damn it.

• 3:06Pablo Torre?

  Right after this ad.

• 3:08Speaker 03

  You're listening to Giraffe Kings Network.

• 3:23Pablo Torre?

  Do we have, uh... How's your voice doing, John? Is it in singing shape for David today?

• 3:29Speaker 02

  I can't sing.

• 3:31Pablo Torre?

  So how are we gonna do this happy birthday appropriately?

• 3:33Speaker 02

  Well, we'll just sing badly.

• 3:35Pablo Torre?

  Okay. David, what number are you up to these days?

• 3:38Speaker 04

  Heinz 57.

• 3:40Pablo Torre?

  Mmm. A secret recipe.

• 3:42Speaker 02

  Oh, you're catching up to me.

• 3:45Speaker 04

  What, are you like my mother? Are you aging backwards?

• 3:48Speaker 02

  No, no, I was trying to make a pun on ketchup. You're ketchup.

• 3:52Speaker 04

  I understood.

• 3:52Speaker 02

  Okay.

• 3:53Speaker 04

  It just wasn't all that creative or funny.

• 3:55Pablo Torre?

  As always, I'm not sure if David ever really understands, but we'll go with it because it's his birthday. David, you're celebrating your special day with us, the only place, of course, you would ever be.

• 4:05Speaker 02

  Well, in fact, he's not selling it, celebrating with us. He is appearing with us by a remote camera, but you should be here on your birthday.

• 4:16Speaker 04

  Well, I had a lovely time with Mr. Lebatard on his show. We had a lovely Nothing Personal show today, and I'm topping off the day with a bunch of amazingly interesting meetings, followed by a few movies that I will be watching. It's a 24-hour day for me. That's what I do on my birthday. I stay awake the entire 24 hours so I can milk every second out of the day.

• 4:40Speaker 02

  That's actually pretty cool.

• 4:43Speaker 04

  It is. I do it every year.

• 4:44Speaker 02

  Have you seen The Brutalist yet?

• 4:46Speaker 04

  I watched it last night from 2:20 to 4:30.

• 4:50Pablo Torre?

  God.

• 4:51Speaker 02

  Well, if you watched it from 2:20 to 4:30, you actually missed about 30 minutes of it. Cause it's actually.

• 4:56Speaker 04

  There's the intermission.

• 4:58Speaker 02

  It's actually three hours and 40 minutes.

• 5:01Speaker 04

  No, it's about 3:25 with a one-minute home media intermission.

• 5:06Speaker 02

  Oh, you're right.

• 5:07Speaker 04

  Uh, so it's about 3:24 of running time and I got it all in, I promise, including the credits.

• 5:13Pablo Torre?

  What I got from David's laundry list of stuff he's doing is that we're like sloppy fifths at this point.

• 5:20Speaker 02

  You know, I'm okay with that. Uh, even a little sop from David Samson is worth it for me on his 57th birthday. You are a young man.

• 5:33Speaker 04

  I couldn't be happier to allocate this time to the two of you. It is my absolute pleasure. I've been basically biting at the seam. That is a mixed metaphor of talking about what's going on in sports business. We haven't done the show in a week or so, or two weeks. I don't know how long it's been. And I haven't been able to reach John because he's so busy. Because even when we're not taping, I like just calling John and discussing these issues. Because it's so fascinating to hear his point of view and how absolutely predictable and wrong that I think it is on so many of these issues.

• 6:06Pablo Torre?

  We're gonna get to all that stuff. I'm trying to parse, though, the mixed metaphor. You are bursting at the seams. I don't know what you would have been biting, though, you know.

• 6:14Speaker 04

  It's bursting.

• 6:15Pablo Torre?

  Again, it's just your day. Whatever, whatever your kink is today, we'll indulge it, I suppose. Um, I, I do wanna point out, though, that we got a message, a review from a very special listener. There's a really great chef. His name is Shai, uh, and he sent a message in to a friend who sent it to me. So this is journalistically just, uh, sourced in a very particular way. But he said this, "On Saturday, some guy I barely know gave me way too high of a shroom dose. I was kinda geeking, so I went home and watched three and a half hours of the sporting class and thought I was there in the room with them."

• 6:52Pablo Torre?

  Which is love, David.

• 6:55Speaker 02

  I love that. I think we probably have an overindex on people who are on mushrooms while they listen.

• 7:02Pablo Torre?

  I mean, this is our, this is our target demo. He says, "It's the best show on YouTube right now. Just me at 5 a.m. trying to go to bed, thinking, quote, 'I have such a full grasp of sports business.'"

• 7:15Speaker 02

  All I remember is how much you laugh. So I'm assuming this guy laughed at us for three and a half hours.

• 7:23Pablo Torre?

  I think he thinks that, like, like any good birthday celebration, we welcome, we welcome our listeners in, like their family. Like it's, like it's the Olive Garden, David Samson. When you're here, are you crying? Is that what's happening?

• 7:38Speaker 04

  I have a little tear in my eye that someone allocated three straight hours in the middle of the night. That's my kind of audience, and it just means we're doing something right.

• 8:04Pablo Torre?

  This message is brought to you by Apple Card. With Apple Card, you earn unlimited daily cash back on everyday purchases, like groceries, or merch, or tickets to the game. Plus, it can be used anywhere MasterCard is accepted. No matter your team, no matter where you shop, Apple Card is here to help you tackle game day. Apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank, USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com. Gifts mean more when they have the power to give more. They can inspire more discovery, give more confidence, and unwrap more of who you are. This Black Friday, give a gift that goes beyond the box: the Dell XPS 13 laptop. With a beautiful design and cutting-edge

• 8:49Pablo Torre?

  performance, it helps you unlock more possibilities. It's the thinnest, lightest XPS laptop yet, with touchscreen, a backlit keyboard, and long-lasting battery life to power you through your day. Built with a durable aluminum chassis, weighing just 2.2 pounds, and Intel Core processors, it's fast, reliable, and portable enough to keep up wherever you go. Visit dell.com to explore the possibilities with XPS. While shopping, you'll also find great perks like Dell Rewards, fast free shipping, premium support, and financing with flexible payment options. Plus, you can find great deals on monitors and accessories. That means you can score a whole new setup now for less. This Black Friday sale is one you don't want to miss.

• 9:33Pablo Torre?

  Head to dell.com/deals. That's dell.com/deals.

• 9:42Pablo Torre?

  I'm pretty sure this won't shock anyone out there, but buying a car is just a hard process. You have to figure out what you want from thousands of options, then you have to find somewhere that's offering a good deal, then you get hit with unexpected fees. But let's just break it down and think about how you describe your ideal car to a friend. You know, something like "good gas mileage, four-wheel drive, reliable, under 30 grand." Luckily, CarGurus makes it that easy. Just describe it to CarGurus the same way. With Guru, you search in your own words and you get listings, real listings, that match. No endless filters, just the car that fits your life. CarGurus also helps you shop with more transparent pricing, allowing you to see when dealer fees are included

• 10:26Pablo Torre?

  so you can compare listings with greater confidence. And with more than 4 million listings, CarGurus has the biggest selection of cars, so it's easier than ever to find the right car and the right deal. It is no wonder CarGurus is the number one most visited car shopping site according to SimilarWeb's estimated traffic data. So buy or sell your next car today with CarGurus at cargurus.com. Go to cargurus.com to make sure your big deal is the best deal. That's C-A-R-G-U-R-U-S dot com. cargurus.com.

• 11:05Speaker 05

  With a Discover Cash Back Card, it's payback time when you earn cash back on everyday purchases. Activate and earn 5% cash back at different categories each quarter on up to $1,500 in purchases. That's 5% cash back at different places each quarter, like grocery stores, on gas, and at restaurants. It pays to discover. Terms apply. See discover.com/five for details.

• 11:34Pablo Torre?

  All right, I want to start with the thing that we have been chomping at the bit, David. That was what we were looking for. You've lost the game show of what mixed metaphor was David Sampson really trying to say. We've been chomping, some say champing, at the bit to discuss truly the center of the Venn diagram between John Skipper, former president of ESPN, and David Sampson, former president of the Marlins, which is the divorce between ESPN and Major League Baseball. And I use that term knowingly and also invitingly. Does this feel like a divorce? What's the word you use to describe this, David? We'll start with you. It is, of course, your 57th birthday.

• 12:09Speaker 04

  Oh, it definitely feels like a divorce. It feels like that it has been building up for a long time. The relationship, in my opinion, has been mediocre with occasional doses of crappiness since my early years in the game and with John at the helm, where we were so busy worried and kissing his arse, trying to get more attention, more love, more money, and none of it ever came. And it finally, baseball realized that there are other dancing partners out there, and it was time. And like many divorces, it's really mediocre for a while until it becomes untenable, and that's when you decide to pull the ripcord.

• 12:52Speaker 02

  That your statement assumes that it was baseball that served the notice. And that's not what I believe. I believe that ESPN, who I also believe wanted the opt-out, that they made the decision not to continue with the deal. And I think baseball at this point is, I don't disagree with you, David, that they reached a breaking point. But I think they reached that breaking point where they got the notice that said, "We are opting out," or a phone call.

• 13:32Speaker 04

  The breaking point has been building. If you want to say an opt-out, remember, this is a mutual opt-out, which means it's not Like a player opt out with a contract in sports where the player can decide, do I want to opt out of this deal and they go out and try to get more money and if they can't, they don't opt out and if they can, they do opt out. This was a situation where both baseball and ESPN had a right to opt out of the deal and both of them decided that it was in both of their best interests to do it. If you want to argue that ESPN made the first call versus MLB, I'm not going to describe it because I don't know the answer of who made the first call.

• 14:15Speaker 04

  I can only tell you that MLB wasn't hiding from that call or fearful of that call. They were very interested in that call.

• 14:23Speaker 02

  I don't have any information about who made the decision first. I do believe that ESPN, doing a baseball deal with the NFL negotiation in front of them, with the NBA negotiation in front of them, with the college football playoff negotiation in front of them, probably insisted on an opt out. It may be, well, it may well be the case that baseball said, we're fine with that because we're not happy the way we're being treated, so we're happy with the opt out. It would not, it's not my instinct that that's what happened. My instinct is that ESPN wanted not to go long term because they had other money they were going to have to spend.

• 15:07Speaker 02

  They have to save some money in the current environment and they wanted the option to save that on baseball. But I do not know that they made the decision before baseball or baseball made the decision before them. I will say that the tone of Mr. Manfred's statement reads like the person who got served, not the person who was serving.

• 15:27Pablo Torre?

  Well, let me, David, I want to read this notice. I want to read the statement at the very least that announces a mutual, and that's the key word, that we and ESPN, Rob Manfred, Commissioner of Baseball speaking now, we and ESPN have mutually agreed to terminate our agreement. While ESPN has stated they would like to continue to have MLB on their platform, particularly in light of their upcoming launch of their DTC product, direct to consumer product, we do not think it's been For us to accept a smaller deal to remain on a shrinking platform. And then to go on to say, to that end, we have been in conversations with several industry parties around these rights over the past several months and expect to have at least two potential options for consideration over the next few weeks. To be clear, our games will continue to be on ESPN for the entirety of the 2025 MLB season, including the postseason.

• 16:12Pablo Torre?

  Any new deal will commence in 2026.

• 16:15Speaker 02

  So wait, we have a little clue there. They didn't say, we know this is no longer a good deal for us. They said it would not be a good deal for us to take less money. He did not say the current deal is a bad deal. He said it would not be a good, isn't that what it said, Pablo?

• 16:32Pablo Torre?

  It, it, it says, um, we do not think it is beneficial for us to accept a smaller deal to remain on a shrinking platform.

• 16:41Speaker 02

  That.

• 16:43Speaker 04

  First of all, we're misleading our audience. This was not a PR statement. This was a memo that was sent to MLB owners by the commissioner.

• 16:53Speaker 02

  Which the commissioner well knows will get leaked.

• 16:56Pablo Torre?

  Yeah, hold, I just, David, hold on, man. David Samson is the number one, uh, he does exegesis, exa, the exegesis of the PR statement, right? You approach this talmudically almost. And you're telling me that you don't think Rob Manfred knew that owners would then release this and circulate it?

• 17:14Speaker 04

  Oh, I think it was written like all memos are to owners as though they will be released immediately. And as a matter of fact, if I'm baseball, I'm more than happy to have this released so that everyone is clear about what's happening. Because the most important part of the memo was pointing out to owners in no uncertain terms, they're going to be fine. And we are getting away from a partner that was not valuing our relationship or our assets in the way that other partners will. And you can't write that memo to an owner and then leak it if you do not have a deal that you know you're going to cut. That is going to be worth that amount or more.

• 17:57Pablo Torre?

  John, I wanna, cause I wanna bring John as a character into this story, right? When you talk, David, about how there has been a coarsening, a dissatisfaction in the relationship. John, as you put it, John and his arse. Were there for you to have dealt with when you were running the Marlins as a witness, participants, protagonists to the coursing. And so when Rob Manfred says, quote, "Furthermore, we have not been pleased with the minimal coverage that MLB has received on ESPN's platforms over the past several years outside of the actual live game coverage." John, how does that statement land with you as the guy who was ostensibly making those calls?

• 18:36Speaker 02

  I, when I was there, I got more complaining from baseball than anybody else. I frequently asked what percentage of the highlights on SportsCenter are baseball? And the answer was never the answer I would have expected, given the tone of the, oh, it's minimal coverage, we're never on. Take a random SportsCenter from baseball season, and it is full of baseball highlights. And there was never any direction from me. I can't be aware of what direction would have been before me or after me. Well, I know I can before me. There was never any direction to do less baseball.

• 19:18Speaker 02

  If anything, I called several times and fussed that we had the top 10 highlights, and all 10 of them were baseball. And I thought, why would, why, when there is tennis and there's other things being played, do we have nothing but baseball highlights? It's just, it's inaccurate. Mike and Mike talked about baseball all the time. Tony Kornheiser and Mike Wilbon talked about baseball. Stephen A. Smith doesn't talk baseball. But I don't, I never understood it. I never, we covered baseball. In fact, I think ESPN's biggest problem here is they need the highlights. And there is how Commissioner Manfred may make the money up.

• 20:01Speaker 02

  I don't think he's going to get more than $550 from anybody else. But I, I would go back, and he will get some couple hundred million dollars from ESPN for highlights. So he's going to add everything together, and it may add up to more. I do not believe there's a single entity in the market that's going to pay $600 million for ESPN's package.

• 20:24Speaker 04

  You you understand that economically, if you have to go to four places and if you add up the four, it's greater than what you get from one place, you've gotten more money.

• 20:34Speaker 02

  I I

• 20:35Speaker 04

  So you may be right that there's going to be different partners that they have, a broadcast partner, a streaming partner, they will be able to sell the highlights. There's also a chance that ESPN, because they've said it, they want local rights to certain teams. And so when you put it all together, that's the way the owners look at it. But John, I can't, no matter where I'm sitting or what day it is of the week, I can't let you get away with what you just said because it's not right. When you talk about all of the baseball that was talked by Mike and Mike and the top 10s were full of baseball, when you take an opening day of a season and you want to move it to the deuce and you're unwilling

• 21:17Speaker 04

  to do anything with ABC and you're unwilling to do any sort of outside of prime window or you just want the one o'clock window for regular ESPN, but then at night you're going to show some sort of college game or other sport that you seem to love more than baseball, we would keep track of that. We would have memos internally about exactly where our game being shown and exactly reality that ESPN was treating us and I'm I don't sound like a scorned lover because you do what you want, it's your network, that's fine, but then don't question why we're feeling as though we're not getting treated right

• 22:01Speaker 04

  when in fact you are making the decisions of how you are allocating baseball and its programming.

• 22:07Speaker 02

  You seem to be suggesting that any of those decisions was a decision made because we didn't like baseball. My guess would be if we wanted to put a baseball game on ESPN2, it's because we had something that would rate higher if we put it on ESPN1. The decisions weren't about what we liked or didn't like. I never took a an MLS game and said, I got to put this on one. We also had contractual obligations. We had to juggle at all times. So are you suggesting that just we didn't like baseball?

• 22:44Speaker 02

  Or then it was a-

• 22:44Speaker 04

  I was suggesting that on one episode of Sporting Class, you're happy to say that ratings don't matter. And now you're gonna say that, hey, if something's gonna rate better, we're gonna move that to the big channel and make sure that we've got baseball and the one that's barely distributed. And so, we're trying to get the, our product out to as many people as possible on what is now a declining platform. The number of people with ESPN, and you'll agree to this, is down significantly since the height. Is that, are you denying that?

• 23:15Speaker 02

  I am denying that ESPN is a declining platform. The cable television universe is declining. The overall ESPN platform, I don't have access to the numbers, but my guess is about as many people watch some version of ESPN as have ever watched it. And the ratings aren't down nearly as much as the number of households.

• 23:39Pablo Torre?

  What I wanna jump in here to say is that I love it when you guys do your old jobs as part of your new job. Like, you guys, David just said "our", John is defending ESPN. It's just a wonderful trip through memory lane. And I wanna point out-

• 23:52Speaker 04

  I would-

• 23:52Pablo Torre?

  What?

• 23:53Speaker 04

  Pablo-

• 23:53Pablo Torre?

  What, David?

• 23:54Speaker 04

  You know, you say that, but it never leaves. So, once you've run a team, I still always think about it from the perspective as, from the commissioner's office, from ownership, from being a president. And John, no matter how far he gets away from the president of ESPN, he'll always be that. And that is what, and that's fine. That's his perspective of everything.

• 24:16Pablo Torre?

  Oh, it's more than fine. It's the reason why some dude out there is on mushrooms watching three and a half hours of this. It's because you guys actually have a unique vantage point and intimate knowledge of these jobs. What I wanna point out, though, is also the comedy, though, John, of David Samson being a guy who loves to allocate, behaving in this context like a union boss.

• 24:42Pablo Torre?

  You're not fighting for quite the same thing as just dollars per second. You're fighting for the rights of your people. And that, to me, is also jumping out.

• 24:52Speaker 04

  And the reason why it mattered to us is that we didn't want to be considered a second-class sport. We didn't ever want to lose a bake-off. And we had these with our regional TV deals, too. Because you know all the regional networks had the Deuces and the Traces. We had a deal in baseball, as an example, that we would never be moved off the main regional network if there's a competition with a hockey game or a basketball game. That we get priority no matter what. And sometimes you get that in full, sometimes you don't. But it was something that always mattered to us the most, that we wanted to be looked at as the number-one priority by our partners when we had jewel events

• 25:37Speaker 04

  or when we had major events during the season, like an opening-day All-Star game, etc.

• 25:43Speaker 02

  When we had jewel events, they went on ESPN. Yankees-Red Sox games went on ESPN on Sunday night. The Home Run Derby went on ESPN. We didn't regard that we were making a decision about the reputation of the league or the pride of the league. We were making a decision based on what we thought. Remember, our mission at ESPN was to serve fans. So if we were putting something else on one, I'm not contradicting. I've frequently said that people overrate the importance of ratings. I've never said they don't matter.

• 26:25Speaker 02

  And when we put something on, go back and find me an example where we took a baseball game and put it on two and put something else on one that rated worse.

• 26:36Speaker 04

  Oh, I'm not gonna... John, go back to 2012 when you and I were together, way before Metal Arc was even a kernel of a thought. And go back to where you were in April of 2012, opening of Marlins Park, a game against the St. Louis Cardinals to start the season. Any recollection of being there?

• 26:58Speaker 02

  I do have a recollection of being there.

• 27:01Speaker 04

  Do you recall the fight that took place that you wanted that game? You, because you were the president of ESPN. Any recollection of the fight that took place of what channel that game was gonna be on?

• 27:13Speaker 02

  Uh, no, I suspect, given the tenor of your question.

• 27:17Pablo Torre?

  Given the deposition he's currently doing.

• 27:19Speaker 02

  I would suggest that we were honoring baseball by putting the opening game of a stadium in a city that was not going, in a team that was not going to rate. Putting that game on was a favor to baseball.

• 27:35Speaker 04

  We were on the cover of Sports Illustrated. This is before we traded them all away, so you can't pretend that it's after the fact. At this point, we had Ozzy Guillen as the manager, who hadn't professed his love for Castro, Jose Reyes, Mark Burley, we had won the offseason. We were the talk of baseball. Our M was actually the top-selling, top-selling item at that time. And the way you, and I will never forget your presence, because obviously you have such an amazing presence, both in height and in anger, but your presence was such that you were so dismissive of what we were doing in Miami and collectively as a sport. I'm not over it, Pablo.

• 28:16Pablo Torre?

  Well, the fu-

• 28:17Speaker 02

  Wait, I, I, I'm hearing-

• 28:19Pablo Torre?

  You don't say, you don't say.

• 28:20Speaker 02

  I'm hearing this from the man who had to, who had to generously increase the stated attendance figures at the Marlins Park. Um, and find me a game in which the Marlins got 2 million people to watch them. Is there such a thing?

• 28:41Pablo Torre?

  I wanna, I wanna jump in here, because I just realized, as David was citing Sports Illustrated, that I am also a character briefly in the story, because that cover of Sports Illustrated happened when I was at Sports Illustrated. It was the third week in a three-week run. I had written a Jeremy Lin cover story, Linsanity, another Jeremy Lin cover story, Linsanity, and the third one, and I'm not saying that they put the Marlins on the cover because they wanted to make the pun, but David, what was the cover line of that Sports Illustrated? Do you remember?

• 29:11Speaker 02

  Something sanity, obviously.

• 29:13Pablo Torre?

  It was Marlin sanity. So I'm just saying, we all benefit from the circumstance in which we may be receiving press coverage.

• 29:20Speaker 04

  It's absolutely fine for you all to think that. And it's 12 years ago, so I don't want to belabor it. But I just would mention about this divorce that's taking place. It is not an example where after a divorce, if the older man is all of a sudden parading around with a 20-year-old beauty queen and you say, "Oh, I won the divorce." This is going to be very easy for us to measure. Because either baseball's going to be right or wrong. And my view is they're going to be right. But, John, it's going to be a very simple equation. And I'm not talking about the spin, because I, and you can ask Coke of this. We spend plenty of time criticizing the commissioner, the commissioner's office, and other owners over what they do and say and how they spin.

• 30:03Speaker 04

  We'll know if they're spinning, and we'll know if they got a deal that was actually better than what they had.

• 30:08Pablo Torre?

  Um, the second thing, though, is that when it comes to cobbling together a portfolio of rights, and what ESPN is going to spend on and what others are spending on, here's some economics, right? So, Apple is paying $85 million a year for their baseball package. Roku is paying $10 million a season for baseball rights. And so, part of the thinking here, David, is that ESPN, when they're negotiating down, as they already had, from 700 million annually to 550 under the deal that is now going to expire after this year, there is a, a, a shift that makes me ask a question about, why does Major League Baseball think that they, or how do they, I don't want to presume, I don't want to lead the witness.

• 30:50Pablo Torre?

  Why does Major League Baseball feel like, uh, when the NBA signs a deal, they, they are, uh, they are being mistreated because of the difference in size?

• 31:01Speaker 04

  First of all, let me just say that when you say it went from 700 to 550, don't mislead our 5 a.m. shroomers. It was a different set of assets that went into the deal.

• 31:14Pablo Torre?

  Please explain.

• 31:15Speaker 04

  Things were pulled out, which is what caused the number to go down. And MLB was then able to take a playoff package and go elsewhere with it. And it ended up being an increase. How do I know? Because we got a bigger distribution of money year two than year one. So, that's first of all. And, John, are you nodding because?

• 31:36Speaker 02

  You're right.

• 31:36Speaker 04

  You're with me?

• 31:37Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 31:39Speaker 04

  So Pablo, you missed that part.

• 31:41Pablo Torre?

  I'm hosting the show. I'm here to have you explain why the characterization of baseball's decline is actually a misread of baseball's estimation of its own value, which I think is a fundamental question I still want your answer to.

• 31:54Speaker 04

  Scott Boris is on a media tour right now, trying to say that the NBA is 10 years behind. He basically talked about your deal and our deal with BAMTech, and he spent a lot of time in the media saying, "Baseball, they'll never be the NBA," that they don't have the ratings, they're literally a decade behind, and they had something good and then they sold it off. The streaming rights, they sold off. He doesn't understand, and the audience, I hope, can now be clarified, what was sold and what the deal was, was really technology. It was a tech deal. It was not the streaming rights. Where baseball has a problem and what they're trying to fix is that streaming rights are held locally by

• 32:37Speaker 04

  each team. And the advantage that the NBA and that the NFL have, and certainly the NFL is number one here, is they collect everything and then sell it as a package, and they're able to get more money for it. And that's what baseball wants to do.

• 32:54Speaker 02

  Yeah, I go back and make the first point, that the deal for, which I did, for 700, 750, included 90 regular season games, and all they got was 30. And it included other things that were different. They didn't take a decrease. It's just a different deal. I do not, again, I do not believe they're going to find a single entity to pay them 750, but it doesn't matter, as you pointed out, David. They will fit. All that matters is what the distribution of revenue is ultimately. And I think the distribution of revenue, their bigger problem is the RSNs, not this package from ESPN.

• 33:34Speaker 04

  And I agree. And I want to go back to Pablo, you mentioning the Roku deal and the Apple deal. ESPN, there's no way whoever is in charge at ESPN, whether it's Bob, Jimmy, take whoever you want, they didn't say, "Oh, look, Roku spent 10 million. That's what we should be spending." It's absolutely ridiculous. The Roku deal... Is for some Sunday games, like 18 of them. And the Apple deal is for Friday night games. It is, there's no postseason, there's no jewel events, there's none of it. And forget exclusive windows like ESPN had on a Sunday night, which are now available to be sold on a Sunday night again to somebody else.

• 34:17Speaker 04

  So, nobody, not even Scott Boris can argue that it's apples to apples doing Roku and Apple, pun intended, with this ESPN deal.

• 34:34Pablo Torre?

  Did you know over 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated? And 90% don't get enough potassium, which is a key electrolyte responsible for energy, muscle function, and clear thinking? Well, that's why you can be drinking water all day and still feel tired, or foggy, or just off. And while most hydration packs really load up on the sugar, Instant Hydration contains zero sugar. There's no glucose spike and no sugar crash. And that is really important to me, because it not only gives me electrolytes without loading me up with sugar, but it also helps me avoid that late afternoon crash. You know, that time of day when your eyes start drooping as you reply to yet another email, and you need something to get you back on track.

• 35:15Pablo Torre?

  Just mix a packet of Instant Hydration with water, and I am feeling ready to push through to the end of the day. For a better way to stay hydrated, go to instanthydration.com/ptfo and use my promo code PTFO for over 40% off your first subscription order. It's Instant Hydration's best offer available. That's instanthydration.com/ptfo, promo code PTFO. Life in 2026 is tough. We all have our struggles and we could all use some help. But trying to figure out how to get the right mental health treatment for you can feel overwhelming.

• 35:51Speaker 06

  Talkiatory helps you move from "I know I need help" to actually having a psychiatrist who listens and a clear personalized treatment plan. Talkiatory is 100% online psychiatry practice that provides comprehensive evaluations, diagnoses, and ongoing medication management for conditions like ADHD, anxiety, depression, and more. With Talkiatory, you can meet with a licensed psychiatrist who takes the time to understand what's going on, builds a personalized treatment plan, and supports you over time with consistent, evidence-based care. And all 800-plus clinicians are in-network with major insurers, so you can use your existing insurance instead of paying monthly subscriptions or out-of-network costs.

• 36:35Speaker 06

  Head to talkiatory.com/ptfo to complete the short assessment and get matched with an in-network psychiatrist in just a few minutes. That's T-A-L-K-I-A-T-R-Y.com/ptfo to get matched in minutes. Talkiatory.com/ptfo.

• 36:53Pablo Torre?

  Cozy makes furniture for the part of life that nobody warns you about. Getting the couch into the room, making the room feel like you, then actually living on it, spills it all. With Cozy, your home can grow with you by adapting to new spaces, new styles, and every era of your life. It's modular furniture, so you can actively adjust your furniture to fit any space. It's all built around making the entire home comfortable and easy so that your stuff works with your life, not around it. The covers are washable and interchangeable, so a refresh is only one wash away, and the spill goes from panic to shrug. And it all ships to your door in easy-to-move boxes. Plus, Cozy's free one-on-one design consultations make the whole home vision a lot less intimidating. Cozy has everything you need to make your home feel like it has a plan

• 37:38Pablo Torre?

  because Cozy makes every part of the process easy. So, visit Cozy today. That's C-O-Z-E-Y.com, and make yourself at home.

• 37:54Pablo Torre?

  So the point is well taken, right? These are different packages, promising different things. And John and David, having negotiated on some level the previous versions of this, you guys know this. What I want to get to, though, is why it is, John, for instance, why the NBA is getting triple its right steal. While baseball, which has significantly more games, is struggling to have that presumption be as obvious.

• 38:22Speaker 02

  Obviously, at some point, when the market speaks, that's what something is worth, right? You can argue to your blue in the face that the house you want to sell is worth a million dollars, but ultimately, the value is determined by what somebody is willing to pay. And the market, the media rights market, has spoken that NBA games are more valuable than baseball games. I'll give you one fundamental difference. The average age of someone who watches a baseball game is over 60 years old. And the average age of somebody who watches an NBA game is 43 or 44 or something. It also is a more diverse.

• 39:05Speaker 04

  That's old information. You saying that that's today? Because that was true when Bud Selig was commissioner. And we worked very hard to get that average actually going down because we viewed that all of our fans were just, if you keep having a demographic that's aging, eventually they croak and you're at zero. So we reversed that. And each year, each year, for the last three or four years of my career and since 2017, each year, the average age of baseball viewers has gone down.

• 39:38Speaker 02

  Magic.

• 39:39Speaker 04

  And it was never 60, by the way. It was 58.

• 39:45Speaker 02

  By the way, which you will celebrate that birthday next year. I would appreciate if Matt could look up, if you just Google, what's the median age of a baseball viewer?

• 39:55Pablo Torre?

  We will have Coco look that up.

• 39:57Speaker 02

  What's the median age of an NBA viewer?

• 39:59Pablo Torre?

  Coco's so good at producing this show that I can cite this from the Sports Business Journal. The average age of fans watching live MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA games, baseball 57, NFL 50, NHL 49, NBA 42.

• 40:16Speaker 02

  So I stand corrected that it's not 60, may never have been 60. But there still is a 16-year age difference between the average viewer, the median age of a, was it 50?

• 40:31Pablo Torre?

  57 versus 42.

• 40:33Speaker 02

  15, 15-year age difference, and that matters. And, and you acknowledge it, David, by suggesting that you guys were working to try to make sure that your audience didn't continue to, to get older. But, but again, I don't think you'll argue, David, the market speaks. And when the market speaks with their checkbook, it sets the value of what something is worth. And baseball is not going to get the money that the NBA got. They're just not.

• 41:01Speaker 04

  It's a different, but again, we don't have, I keep saying we, excuse me, they do not have the bundle to sell the way the NBA does or the way the NFL does, which is why they're trying to get into that position. If everything were equal, everything, the NFL would get more than the NBA and Major League Baseball, but NBA and Major League Baseball would be super close. And they would be in second place by a fairly high number. What I'm interested in seeing is once all of the local streaming rights and many of the local rights are actually under one umbrella within baseball, then we'll be able to figure out

• 41:42Speaker 04

  whether or not they can get more national days, the way Adam Silver's done, more exclusive windows, the way Adam Silver's done, because there are already more bidders, John. Back in the day, you, ESPN was our daddy. We had, we had, we had very little other choice than to deal with you.

• 42:01Pablo Torre?

  We know you guys, we know you guys smelled the same deodorant wise, so there is that.

• 42:06Speaker 02

  It sounds very Pedro Martinez like there.

• 42:10Speaker 04

  I don't mean it to be that.

• 42:11Speaker 02

  I know you don't.

• 42:12Speaker 04

  I just mean it to be that now MLB will have many more than one bidder. Let's face it, why did the NBA get a triple? You know, because there was more than one bidder. And WBD was in a position where we can argue till we're blue in the face that they were gonna bid, bid, bid, and then be okay with not winning. Baseball now, they think, and we're gonna find out, they think there are more bidders than have existed in the past, and they plan to take advantage of that fact in order to drive the price up.

• 42:46Speaker 02

  That all sounds sensible, and I'll surprise you by saying, I hope baseball gets a very big number. I, it would make me happy. I think we have a better sports calendar when baseball is stronger. So there's no, I have no, no, uh, enmity towards, I hope they succeed here. Uh, I think it would be good.

• 43:08Pablo Torre?

  One thing that I wanna get to, though, when it comes to, David is smiling wryly as if John's well wishes are not persuasive.

• 43:16Speaker 02

  Because we wouldn't accede to their wishes, they thought it had something to do other than with what worked for us in a financial model. Uh, we haven't talked, by the way, about why.

• 43:27Speaker 04

  You told me you never cared about the financial model. You used to say, if it's something I want, I'm gonna go one dollar more than the next guy because I don't care what the numbers are, I'm gonna get the deal done.

• 43:37Speaker 02

  Well, that is a financial model.

• 43:38Speaker 04

  And now you're saying, oh, it's all about the financial model. Wait.

• 43:42Pablo Torre?

  You're looking at the financial model in the middle screen here, David.

• 43:45Speaker 02

  I always said my financial model is which is more valuable? And I am going to buy the rights for the things that are the most valuable? But that was my financial model. No, I did not do, spend a lot of time on a computer figuring it out. And, and all that mattered.

• 44:03Speaker 02

  At that point was, what are the most important things for us to have? So that everybody feels that they have to have a pay TV subscription to get ESPN. That is still the case. And when you talk about flagship, flagship will change what matters. Cause there, what matters is subscriptions. And David, to your point about summer, it doesn't matter. It does not matter. When you say what's on there in the summer, doesn't matter. All that matters is do people cancel? And so if you have enough other stuff, it will be a thin service if they don't have baseball. And I think they should try to get some baseball.

• 44:45Speaker 02

  But it will not matter if they don't for their subscription economics.

• 44:50Speaker 04

  I may be confused about something. Why was ESPN showing, was it the Korean baseball league? Was it the Filipino baseball league? I can't remember what it was when there was no baseball going on during COVID and there were no sports. And in order to try to keep their subscription revenue, cable revenue, they had an obligation to show something. And so they were just throwing whatever they could on TV. I may have made that up.

• 45:18Speaker 02

  No, no, it did happen, but it only makes my point, not your point. It didn't matter what it rated. It mattered that we were either fulfilling a contractual obligation to have baseball or that we needed, you have to have something to put on. Nobody's canceling their.

• 45:35Speaker 04

  Exactly. John, you're actually agreeing with what I'm saying. Because you had to replace it with crap. And if that had lasted longer, your entire financial model would have disappeared.

• 45:48Speaker 02

  No, it wasn't true. The money we saved on paying the rights actually benefited the company's bottom line. So putting the crap on did not, we didn't lose distribution fees at all and we saved rights.

• 46:02Speaker 04

  Then why do you do rights deals? Then why do you do any rights deals? If you can just put crap on, just put crap on.

• 46:07Speaker 02

  It's like the chocolate chip cookie, David. You gotta have a certain number of chocolate chips in there to actually have a. Chocolate chip cookie? We wanted to be the worldwide leader in sports. We want the best sports on ESPN. We always did. And I don't mind that you say we and I say we. If you put heart and soul for 20-plus years into something, you're gonna say we. Why not? I was on the home team and I will always be on the home team. You know what the ad revenue against baseball is on ESPN? 58.5 million dollars. 58.5 million dollars. So they just saved themselves 540 million dollars, give or take. And by the way, they'll put something in those slots.

• 46:47Speaker 04

  But you're not counting sub-revenue. All of a sudden, you're gonna say that ad revenue is the driver of these deals when you know very well that ad revenue is a tiny little component of why you do these deals.

• 46:58Speaker 02

  No, the, the, the sub-fees are 10 times more important. No, they're not. It's about 70/30. About 70/30. So they're two, over two times more important, the sub-fees. And they will not lose any sub-fees. Nobody will cancel. They're declining. The KTV is declining. The rate of decline will not be affected by ESPN not having baseball in the summer. It will not be.

• 47:24Speaker 04

  This is your chocolate chip analogy. That's fine. Do without the baseball chips and eventually you're having a sugar cookie. I, uh...

• 47:32Speaker 02

  But you don't if you have all the SEC, all the ACC, the NBA, Wimbledon, US Open, NFL. You don't. I mean, it's not, you can argue about what is, what is essential programming. I would argue that having some baseball is essential. Um, but if you're ranking it and it, it just is the fact, if you're ranking it, you care more about NFL, college football, and NBA.

• 48:14Pablo Torre?

  I can't decide if I'm doing a horrible or great job hosting the show right now. I've tried to get in a dozen times. Each time you guys have energy that is so deep inside of you that I am regretting even trying to dip a toe in in between you guys. Just some accounting, though. I believe David did try to argue that the reason to have baseball is because there might be another pandemic and you need something. So, point taken. World looks like it's real shaky. Thank you. Understood. The second thing, though, when it comes to is, and this is the fundamental question here that I want to get to, and John alluded to it. Is ESPN's decision specific to ESPN or a symptom of a marketplace that has pretty

• 48:57Pablo Torre?

  much seen, and we've celebrated it, sports rights increase? Right? So, the question that we're gonna find the answer to in a wait-to-see Pablo Finds Out crossover is, what's the actual number in the end? Because that's gonna tell us something about the economy that all of us are working and analyzing.

• 49:15Speaker 02

  I personally think it was pretty specific to ESPN. They have spent a lot of money on rights. They are, as you pointed out, David, declining. The pay-TV universe is declining. They are going to have to spend some money to launch Flagship, and they decide to save money here. I believe, and it didn't get nearly as much attention because it's much smaller, but I do believe that ESPN has already suggested they will not be bidding for F1. It's the same thing.

• 49:43Pablo Torre?

  Was gonna bring that up.

• 49:44Speaker 02

  They are looking at what, in their minds, and I've said already, David, I don't necessarily agree with it, but they are looking at, in their offices, what do they not have to pay for because they can't buy everything? And they have decided-

• 50:01Speaker 04

  And what can't they live without?

• 50:03Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 50:03Pablo Torre?

  Right. F1, by the way, David, in that way is a compliment to baseball. It's not merely that they're shedding the thing that feels archaic, allegedly. They're also shedding the new hot thing that apparently is getting too financially onerous to include in the portfolio of what they take into the media apocalypse.

• 50:22Speaker 04

  Well, they're looking for way more than a triple. And they're out there and it's interesting. You've got bidders for it. All these, you know, I'd love to talk for a second about Netflix and how interested they are in not doing live events and all they do is live events. And I was watching SAG recently, the last, the award show.

• 50:39Pablo Torre?

  Live?

• 50:40Speaker 04

  And so-

• 50:40Pablo Torre?

  On Netflix?

• 50:41Speaker 04

  Live, on Netflix. And Netflix is a bidder.

• 50:46Pablo Torre?

  That's right. The SAG Awards are sports now, John.

• 50:50Speaker 04

  Oh, I'm just saying live events.

• 50:51Speaker 02

  It's live.

• 50:52Pablo Torre?

  No, no, but my point being that like the business of live is clearly Netflix has always said, "We're not putting a toe in this." And now their, their whole body is in it.

• 51:01Speaker 02

  It, by the way, is an interesting thing because you suggested that F1 is the hot thing. The F1 ratings, while I know they don't count, the F1 ratings are not that dramatic. They're not that spectacular. And they won't draw three times the money because it's perceived to be hot. And it is a bit of a problem for baseball that they're not perceived to be hot. I apologize for that if that's offensive. I don't think it is. They, they have a hard time suggesting that they're that culturally relevant.

• 51:37Pablo Torre?

  Buzzy, relevant.

• 51:38Speaker 02

  And I've always believed that one of the issues with baseball is they have not figured out how to market their players or their players have not allowed them to market. They have maybe the best baseball players who have ever played the game and most Americans don't know who they are.

• 51:57Speaker 04

  When you look at, to me, it's much more of a supply issue. And the biggest issue that we have is that there's 162 regular season games, followed by only one month of postseason. And what we've been trying to do, and we're having a hard time with the union, is we're trying to get the regular season shorter and the postseason longer. Now, we've definitely added a round with the wildcard round. Love the idea of the one and done, where the game seven thing that happens, where more people pay attention, both advertisers and social relevance, cultural relevance. But I don't agree that it's anything other than we're flooding the market with games.

• 52:40Speaker 04

  And what used to be an amazing amount of money that would come because of that, that has now changed. And I want to say what I mean, John, because when you're negotiating with the regional sports network, and you're providing 150 games, because that's all we could offer, and you're offering three-hour games, plus pre and post, you are taking up a lot of programming time for these RSNs, who are collecting huge sums of money from the cable companies for distribution of that regional sports network. That entire financial model has now changed, and baseball is now stuck with all of this inventory,

• 53:22Speaker 04

  trying to figure out the best way to monetize it, when the union is not being altogether helpful, because the other leagues have much longer post-seasons.

• 53:33Speaker 02

  There's nothing to disagree with there, but it doesn't address the essential question, David, of why aren't the best baseball players bigger stars? You know this. It's a fact. You can say, you look at sponsorship numbers, you look at posters that are up in 17-year-olds' rooms, and there aren't baseball players there. I forget how many baseball players-

• 53:54Speaker 04

  I really don't know how to say this, John, in a way that you may or may not appreciate-

• 53:57Speaker 02

  It's ESPN's fault.

• 54:00Speaker 04

  No, because the best players in baseball don't speak English.

• 54:05Speaker 04

  And aren't all that comfortable and it's been a big issue with marketing. Because the commercials they do don't have them talking. They don't have them, you don't have a Patrick Mahomes in baseball. We wanted Mike Trout to be the person. He came out and said, I don't want to be that person. And I don't want it, I don't want this to become a sensitive, it's not a race issue.

• 54:22Pablo Torre?

  No, no, no, but this, but this is.

• 54:24Speaker 04

  This is a real thing, Pablo.

• 54:26Pablo Torre?

  What's funny, of course, is that in these arguments, we have a glut of games. We have foreign players who don't feel comfortable in English. These are parallel problems what the NBA is grappling with, except they just tripled their rights deal. I just want to point out, when it comes to the problem you're articulating, David, it is, I want to take this clinically as opposed to ideologically. It does seem like it is a shame that many players born abroad who don't speak English are not as popular as their talent and charisma athletically would lead them to be.

• 54:59Speaker 02

  I don't think that's the problem. If you take the NBA All-Stars and march them in this office one by one, I know who every one of them is. It doesn't matter, Jokic, Donic, Victor Bumbiana, they're all international players.

• 55:17Pablo Torre?

  It's like an 85%.

• 55:18Speaker 04

  You didn't get one name right.

• 55:19Pablo Torre?

  85% pronunciation on that.

• 55:22Speaker 02

  Well, I may not have gotten the pronunciation of the spelling right.

• 55:25Pablo Torre?

  But in the police lineup, that's.

• 55:27Speaker 02

  Wembanyama, I got that right.

• 55:28Pablo Torre?

  Wembenyama, very close.

• 55:30Speaker 02

  Very close.

• 55:31Pablo Torre?

  Very close.

• 55:31Speaker 02

  But by the way, I know who every one of them are. If you march all of the baseball players who will make the All-Stars game, forget me. You take them to a high school and you send them across the stage. Do you think there are any NBA players that almost all those people don't know?

• 55:49Speaker 04

  I think the number of NBA players known by a group will be the same as the number of MLB players. There's 15 on an NBA team, there's 26 on an MLB team. The superstars are recognized, but there are definite issues because what makes someone more recognizable is being more present nationally, both while they're playing and also while they're promoting. And baseball has a problem because there's not a lot of national inventory and there's not a lot of national commercials. That's just my view of it, and if you disagree, you disagree.

• 56:26Speaker 02

  No, no, I don't disagree with that. In fact, one of the other problems that I think you and they are working on is the regional blackouts. They were a disaster if you were a broadcaster. It's like, really? I can't get, I couldn't get enough games to, that were exclusive. All I could get was Sunday night. Everything else had a, had a conflict. And that was a problem.

• 56:54Speaker 04

  That's exactly right. That, but that's what's now changing. Because it has to, because you're exactly right, because all the teams would never vote to give another national window. Every team in baseball was Jim Dolan.

• 57:09Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 57:09Speaker 04

  And when you have more than 23 Jim Dolans, you can't get anything done. But now in baseball, there are way fewer Jim Dolans.

• 57:18Pablo Torre?

  I just shuddered at the hypothetical of 23 Jim Dolans walking into a room. Look, there is an empirical question you guys have posed that we here at Palatory finds out would like to test. I do want to focus group a bunch of NBA All-Stars and MLB All-Stars and see if the math of Kyle Kuzma having 3 million more Instagram followers than Aaron Judge is gonna bear out in the market research. Which is sad, which is sad on lots of levels. By the way, like and subscribe all of our shows, please, here at Metalark Media. We would like more followers, as always. What I'm left here, having found out, though, on David Samson's birthday, is that what you guys both really want from each other is to be loved. It's very clear.

• 58:02Speaker 02

  No question.

• 58:04Pablo Torre?

  You guys both want to be recognized by each other in the way that you recognize yourself. And that's, what is that if not a family?

• 58:11Speaker 02

  But what is the shuddering, David? I mean, genuinely, Kyle Kuzma does have more social followers. Why does Kyle Kuzma have more followers on social media than Aaron Judge? He's not-

• 58:24Pablo Torre?

  That's a depressing question, frankly.

• 58:26Speaker 02

  The answer is partly because the league doesn't insist on marketing them. They don't, the NBA insists that these guys do this stuff. Again, you're gonna have a problem-

• 58:36Speaker 04

  John, if you brought Aaron Judge, John, if you brought Aaron Judge and Kyle Kuzma into your office- Eighty out of eighty people will know Aaron Judge and one out of eighty will be able to point out Kyle Kuzma if you put him in a lineup.

• 58:49Pablo Torre?

  We are strictly now in yelling into our own echo chamber territory. Each of these panels on YouTube being an echo chamber. More research to come. David, John, I love you both.

• 59:05Speaker 02

  Thank you, Pablo. Thank you, David.

• 59:07Speaker 04

  Happy birthday.

• 59:08Speaker 02

  Happy birthday.

• 59:10Pablo Torre?

  Happy birthday.

• 59:12Speaker 02

  Whatever, whatever, whatever. God damn it. Whatever.

• 59:25Pablo Torre?

  This has been Pablo Torre Finds Out, a Meadowlark Media production. And I'll talk to you next time.

• 59:52Speaker 05

  With a Discover Cash Back Card, it's payback time when you earn cash back on everyday purchases. Activate and earn 5% cash back at different categories each quarter on up to $1,500 in purchases. That's 5% cash back at different places each quarter, like grocery stores, on gas, and at restaurants. It pays to discover. Terms apply. See discover.com/five for details.

• 1:00:15Speaker 07

  State Fair food is getting smaller and pricier. We'll have room for fried cookies. Okay, you never overspend on food. What's your deal?

• 1:00:23Speaker 03

  What's his deal? He went to Metro and got $450 in value on the new Samsung Galaxy 837 5G for free and no activation fees.

• 1:00:32Speaker 07

  Free phone? Oh, sign me up.

• 1:00:34Speaker 03

  Get that more for your money feeling, only on Metro by T-Mobile. Bring your number and activate $40 period plan. $450 based on device discount waived activation fee. Not available if with Metro or T-Mobile in the past 180 days.

• 1:00:46Speaker 03

  Your sausage McMuffin with egg didn't change. Your receipt did. The sausage McMuffin with egg extra value meal includes a hash brown and a small coffee for just $5, only at McDonald's for a limited time. Price and participation may vary. Promotion pricing may be lower than meal pricing.