Instantaneous Acceleration - Military-Filmed UFO Footage

In 2021, an MQ-9 Reaper drone, while patrolling the skies over the Jordanian-Syrian border, caught a glimpse of an unknown object. The controller of the sensor platform eventually managed to get a lock on the object, but when they did, the UAP seemingly mocked the high-tech Reaper and displayed astonishing speed - akin to instantaneous acceleration - one of the “Five Observables” used by our military to identify genuine UAP. Military aviators have described similar acceleration they’ve seen with their own eyes. Now, for the first time, video recorded by U. S. intelligence operatives of a genuine UAP displaying mind-boggling acceleration is being made public. In this episode of WEAPONIZED, Jeremy and George invite friend and colleague Marik von Rennenkampff back to the program to review the unique UAP video made public last week and to meticulously analyze a new, never-before-seen piece of footage of a mystery object designated by the military as a UAP. See the footage for yourselves and hear Marik’s point-by-point evaluation of how the UAP displays evidence of the very first official “observable” - unlike any video ever obtained from government servers. TRIANGLE FORMATION UAP / FULL REPORT : ⁠https://www.weaponizedpodcast.com/news-1/syria-uap⁠ 🤖 MERCH : https://Weaponized-Shop. Fourthwall.com 👽 MAIN : https://YouTube.com/@JeremyCorbell 🛸 CLIPS : https://YouTube.com/@WEAPONIZEDclips 🕵️ MORE : https://WeaponizedPodcast.com GOT A TIP? Reach out to us at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ••• Watch Corbell's six-part UFO docuseries titled UFO REVOLUTION on TUBI here : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://tubitv.com/series/300002259/tmz-presents-ufo-revolution/season-2⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Watch Knapp’s six-part UFO docuseries titled INVESTIGATION ALIEN on NETFLIX here : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://netflix.com/title/81674441⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ••• You can now watch all of Corbell's movies for free on YouTube here : BOB LAZAR : AREA 51 & FLYING SAUCERS ⁠https://youtu.be/sZaE5rIavVA⁠ HUNT FOR THE SKINWALKER ⁠https://youtu.be/TczkJ6UAQ8A⁠ PATIENT SEVENTEEN ⁠https://youtu.be/gDVX0kRqXxE⁠ ••• For breaking news, follow Corbell & Knapp on all social media. Extras and bonuses from the episode can be found at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠WeaponizedPodcast.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

• 0:26Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Indeed. You're ready to level up your business, but the pressure to find the right person to make that happen is intense. Indeed sponsored jobs can help carry the load. It boosts your job post to help it reach quality talent fast. Cut through the chaos with Indeed sponsored jobs. Get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring now? Then this is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.

• 0:55Jeremy Corbell?

  You know, is this going to increase value into the conversation about true UAP? And so we did. We shared with you kind of, you know, some really interesting footage that we were certain was interesting.

• 1:08Speaker 03

  I mean this sincerely, and I don't mean to be hyperbolic, but the footage, Jeremy, that you sent to me to review is on its face, simply on its face, the most extraordinary footage I have ever seen. And I've spent a lot of time looking at infrared videos and done a lot of geometrical analysis of these videos. Those five, six observables. You know, there's, there's one that just, it's in your face in this footage.

• 1:36George Knapp?

  It's moseying along at whatever speed it is. We get a lock on it. Oh boy, we got a lock on it. And it realizes, oh, you got a lock on me. Here, follow this dude. See ya. This is weaponized.

• 1:55George Knapp?

  This is Weaponized. I'm George Knapp here in sunny post-winter. Already feels like we're on the edge of summer Las Vegas. Joined by my friend and colleague Jeremy Corbell. Man, Jeremy, it was one tough winter here, a long, tough winter we just had. Brutally cold. I mean, it got down into the 40s sometimes, mostly in the 60s, though. And, gosh, I'm so glad that's over with. I didn't have to use my motorized snowplow at all.

• 2:19Jeremy Corbell?

  The entire East Coast is belly aching. There's some, you know, once in every 10-year snowstorm, and, you know, friends are saying they're digging out their cars. I don't know if they're exaggerating, but they're telling me it's pretty gnarly on the East Coast with snow.

• 2:34George Knapp?

  Yeah, my regrets go out to them. I miss winter. I mean, I'd like to see at least some kind of winter here in Las Vegas, but we basically didn't have one at all. And now the sun is shining. It could go out in bag rays today. I wanted to mention something. I do want to wish a happy birthday to Mr. Four Names himself, Jeremy Corbell. I think, in honor of your birthday, Jeremy, we should probably award you another name. I mean, you could be Mr. Five Name. And I nominate the name Duke, because I've always liked that name. I had an uncle named Duke. And I hereby bequeath to you, or maybe you can just think about it for a day or two, Duke, Mr. Five Names. Happy birthday.

• 3:11Jeremy Corbell?

  All the nicknames I've ever had have been like shithead and stuff like that. Duke? I'll take it. That's a great one.

• 3:18George Knapp?

  So last week on this program, we uncorked a new UAP video, designated UAP by the Department of War and its analysts, not by us. It was video acquired from official Department of War vaults and collections. And although we, I've been mostly off of social media for the past week or so, I was pretty sure that people would be happy about this video, glad to see some new footage, never-before-released images that would be embraced by UFO world, which is always what happens, you know. So how'd that play out? I mean, no one could possibly say that that objects in those video, that video, were birds or balloons, could they?

• 3:57Jeremy Corbell?

  Right, I mean, we predicted that, you know, and it's a it's a difficult balance and dance. You know, it's it's very hard to get new data for people to look at at all. That is a heroic feat if new data gets out to the public and not just by us. I mean, that's it's a heroic feat in general. So I'm really grateful to be able to see these things. And, and, you know, I think and you think the public needs to see them too, as far as our reporting goes. But we do know that there's going to be easy dismissals of things. Look, we told people the the actual reality that this is part of an analysis of UAP.

• 4:37Jeremy Corbell?

  That's designated UAP, even the term orb in documentation, triangle formation, UAP. You know, so obviously and clearly people have been studying the footage. You put it out and the easy things that you say is, well, you know, looks like a bird, looks like a balloon. You know, here's another example. Okay, fine, but those are people filming birds and balloons. And typically, when you're looking through that data and that sensor system, you'd hope to have more data. And that's always the key is that if you don't have enough data inside of a piece of footage, then people can dismiss things and try to say, nothing to see here, move on.

• 5:18Jeremy Corbell?

  And you don't really have a rebuttal because you know, and and I and we're reporting correctly, the information. But, you know, you can't disprove the disprovers. So it really comes down to the best fidelity is going to be when there's a lot of numbers on the screen. There's a lot of data where you can see range and speed and and all that. I I think ultimately, George, you and I, when we've been exposed to stuff, and and if we can obtain and release, then the point is, we'd love to show the observables. You know, we all we all talk about the observables with UAP. And, you know, there's five or six observables, but they are significant.

• 6:01Jeremy Corbell?

  When you're when you're looking at the way that these machines, these hard, physical machines. The way that they propel and traverse. So that's really the, the kind of the golden ring, as they say, is if you can have a piece of footage that truly shows one of the observables we've all heard about in UFO land.

• 6:21George Knapp?

  You know, I laugh at some of the comments that have been sent to me by other people. It's like, they can't get over the fact that these sensor systems way up in the sky do not have IMAX movie quality cameras attached to them. That they are, that the images that are recorded by sensor systems, classified sensor systems, are not suitable for showing in a movie theater. They're picked up on thermal sensors, things like that. So they're not really cinematic in their presentation. And to those who think it's easy, um, and that there's got to be better video, go get it. Let's knock yourself out. Um, if it's so easy, go ahead and go get it if it really exists out there. We try really hard to get the best images we can.

• 7:05George Knapp?

  We spend a lot of time vetting them and we present them and people can take them or leave them, whatever they want.

• 7:11Jeremy Corbell?

  Well, let me correct you once again. We don't try that, you know, that's, um, we've never solicited anything. People know that we're trustworthy. I, I saw some comments online, like this big conspiracy, like, oh, they released something again, like, you know, some mystery, like we're part of some conspiracy, some grand conspiracy, where we get this footage and then we put it out and we must be seeding the population with some lie. You know, I, I take umbrage to that and I rarely do because we never asked for this. We never solicit. People trust us and that's what it comes down to. You know, I've talked to, to numerous people that have come forward to you and me and why did you choose, you know, us?

• 7:56Jeremy Corbell?

  Why did you, there's a ton of people you could go to. Why did you choose us? Because I trust you. I trust you to not, um, handle this poorly. I trust you to not twist anything. And, and I really, um, I'm grateful that people do. So I just wanted to kind of say that was a response that I saw is we're part of some grand conspiracy. No, it's like really hard work and just allowing people to know they're safe to trust you. And then if it is something that is acceptable to put out and there's, there's times that it's not.

• 8:25George Knapp?

  Yeah, a lot of the stuff, most of the stuff I'd say that comes our way, we never use it, never. Right. So I do want to get somebody to weigh in, somebody who knows what they're talking about in analyzing videos like that and what else we might be sharing today and in future episodes. And he's become a good friend of ours, somebody we trust to take a fair look at at these videos that come our way, one way or another. His name is Merrick von Rennencamp. He was a, he's a contributor to The Hill, an opinion writer for The Hill. But before that, he was an analyst for the Department of State's Bureau of International Security. He was a presidential appointee to the Department of Defense, now called

• 9:06George Knapp?

  the Department of War. And he really has helped us understand what is and is not in videos like this. Merrick, welcome back to Weaponized.

• 9:14Speaker 03

  George, Jeremy, thanks so much for having me. I'm really, really excited to be here to talk about this new footage that we are about to be releasing here.

• 9:24Jeremy Corbell?

  Wait, wait, wait. Are we releasing?

• 9:26George Knapp?

  You blew the secret. It's blew the secret.

• 9:29Jeremy Corbell?

  Okay, look, Merrick, there is, you know, new footage and, you know, we've showed you some. I just want to tell our audience, you know, George and I go through this extensive process. And when we get to the, to kind of towards the end of that process, I mean, you can attest to it, Merrick, I'm, we're really careful. Sometimes we have things that we think are really good, but we don't have the technical knowledge. And you've actually helped us assess things that we're like, okay, the juice isn't worth the squeeze. We're not sure on that one. So we're not going to put that out. So you've really been helpful to us on Weaponized with just some of the technical stuff that we are not capable of doing. So you're kind of the last step for us sometimes is, you know, is this going

• 10:13Jeremy Corbell?

  to increase value into the conversation about true UAP? And so we did, we shared with you kind of, you know, some really interesting footage that we were certain was interesting. And I think you concur, but I would like you to educate people, professor, you know, I'd like you to educate people about kind of what we're seeing before we look at the video, so we can really understand what's going on, unless you want to tell me a little bit about what's going on in your personal life right now, because I'd like to know that, too.

• 10:42Speaker 03

  Yeah, we can, we can put pause on that for, for, maybe for a future discussion, but I will, I'll preface this in all seriousness, and I've spent quite a bit of time looking at these videos, right, we, we all know the gimbal video and the tic tac video, the Omaha, the Jackson, you go up and down the list, all of which are extraordinary, and they cannot, believe it or not, they cannot be explained away very easily, and the, the armchair debunkers have hidden behind very convoluted explanations, or frankly, have not offered any explanations at all for some of these videos, which I think, you know, is indicative of the truly anomalous nature of what we're seeing in some of these videos.

• 11:27Speaker 03

  But I, I am, I am, I mean this sincerely, and I don't mean to be hyperbolic, but the footage, Jeremy, that, that you sent to me to review is on its face, simply on its face, the most extraordinary footage I, I've ever seen, and I've spent a lot of time looking at infrared videos, and done a lot of geometrical analysis of these videos. So I will, I'll preface the discussion by saying, and you alluded to it, Jeremy, but those, those, those five, six observables, I, you know, there's, there's one that just, it's in your face in this footage, and a preliminary analysis, which we'll get into, but on my end, and I'm just giving folks the bottom line up front here, preliminary

• 12:11Speaker 03

  analysis does not suggest that that is an artifact of, of some kind of weird camera movement, and that first observable is instantaneous acceleration, and it, sure, to, you know, to, again, at a, at a very first kind of run preliminary analysis does appear to be what we see in this footage. And secondarily, we see an object, and again, we'll, we'll dive into the But we see an object lacking wings, flaps, control surfaces, a discernible or obvious means of propulsion. There's no jet exhaust and it it makes a direction change and that would be that's another observable potentially that's positive lift

• 12:52Speaker 03

  colloquially known as as anti-gravity but that is that is another observable that appears to be demonstrated and and there's potentially a third and that is hypersonic velocity because the the the speed with which this thing appears to zip out of frame is is quite extraordinary. So I I'm I'm prefacing all of that kind of with with my high level takeaways. I invite obviously further analysis, but this is this is quite an extraordinary piece of footage and kudos to you guys for for getting it out.

• 13:23George Knapp?

  Well, we're gonna do it together. Yeah. So we're gonna let it fly here now or maybe here but I I wanted to see if Merrick was gonna address the last week's video as well.

• 13:34Speaker 03

  Yeah, it's interesting. Right? We had those those three three objects that were they're recorded from an MQ-1 Predator drone. This is over the Persian Gulf, looks like off the coast of Iran. Certainly interesting. I think what we really need to do and and our our good friend Mick West has built a a 3D simulation to for precisely these kinds of these kinds of cases and videos. He seems to say it's a bird. Well, then we then we say, okay, prove it. You have camera elevation angle. You have the line of sight, the bearing that the line of sight is. You have that the actual location over the ocean where that that camera is pointed. So you have a lot of metrics.

• 14:16Speaker 03

  Okay, let's put let's put it in. Let's do that. Let's do the science. He hasn't done that yet. The the day I think the day before or two days before that that video came out, Mick was on social media saying, oh, I'm I'm not posting. I'm not active. I'm just bored. I'm paraphrasing because there haven't been any good UFO videos. Well, here here are two, Mick. You know, let's let's go ahead and let's do the analysis and you know, let's let's have the discussion.

• 14:39George Knapp?

  Yeah, absolutely. When we saw that video, that three objects, it looks like a triangle, like maybe it's it's a fixed structure and then the The the the points of light changed position relative to each other. Didn't look like it's a singular object. But but it's still, as far as you're concerned, it's not that strong compared to other things that you've seen.

• 15:03Speaker 03

  You know, the the challenge with most of these videos is that we don't know the range. We don't know how far that object is from the camera. We know how far the the ocean or the ground is. We have a very good sense of what that is, but we don't have the range. And that is the key element that, um, you know, that will make or break. Uh, in a, it'll separate, uh, uh, you know, an interesting video from an extraordinary video. Unless unless it's something that's plainly obvious or in very much in your face, like the video we we might be watching in a few minutes here. Um, and that that is the key. But I, you know, look, I I I encourage folks to do the geometrical analyses. There is a, there's a lot of data in that in that video, George, and the one that was just released.

• 15:47Speaker 03

  Um, and you know, it's interesting, you know, uh, Mick West, the debunker, the world's most prominent debunker, has openly admitted that he was paid to develop code to do these 3D simulations, to do this kind of this kind of work. And he hasn't, he hasn't put it into his simulator. So, look, I I um, I I look forward to seeing, um, how that develops. Because that we'll we'll learn more once, once we have that full geometric 3D visualization of of what we're looking at.

• 16:15George Knapp?

  Jeremy, you sometimes we have to make compromises with what information we can share, right?

• 16:21Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

• 16:47Jeremy Corbell?

  Yeah, and that's the point. It's a very difficult dance. We do give as much as we can. So, for example, we didn't make up these title names, right? This is designated UAP within intelligence agencies. These are part of analysis a lot of the time. But yeah, I can't go further than that. But yes, you have to, we have to protect certain elements of information. You know, wish we didn't have to do that. Best we can do is put it out. And you know, you're calling out one individual, you know, who does analysis. Man, there are so many bright people on the interwebs that can all contribute and really show us their findings.

• 17:27Jeremy Corbell?

  So I think, you know, with each video that we've been able to, you know, release to the public, it's another data point. So I kind of look at it like a bigger picture, like some videos, they just teach the public, like this is not grainy. I even Neil deGrasse Tyson said, wow, grainy, black and white videos. Grainy? These are, these are thermal. These are weapons, platforms and systems. They can see in the dark. There's no grain in it. So it's like, I think even the general public needs to be educated. So every piece helps us understand more. When you saw the gimbal, you saw the tic tac video. I mean, that was huge. People were like, oh my gosh.

• 18:07Jeremy Corbell?

  When you see some of these UAP getting locked, I mean, target lock, solid lock. You know, you get hopefully more information and I think that's also what we're going to see today. So yeah, look, give us a breakdown, Merrick, so that people really appreciate the visual they're about. Because it's long. Now, let me tell you, I, you know, I created title cards to replicate the exact title cards that would have been there. This shows a bunch of sections of footage and then repeats certain elements of footage. Now, I didn't do that. That was part of an internal examination done by our intelligence agencies. So.

• 18:52Jeremy Corbell?

  You know, that's what you're seeing in these chunks, but we're going to play it in one piece.

• 18:56Speaker 03

  And what I'd like to do, just because I find this footage so intriguing, it's in your face, it's compelling to me at least. Um, I, I think it's so important that, uh, that I think it's worthwhile just doing a very, very high level kind of, uh, scene setter, just a little bit of context and background. So folks can understand what we're actually, um, looking at. And so what we are looking at is, um, footage from, an MQ nine Reaper drone and we're looking at footage from, uh, the camera that is right up here in the front. Um, and this is a, this is a, this is not precise. It's very general. It's very high level. Overview. There's enough data in the, in the video that allows us to see,

• 19:41Speaker 03

  where this, this Reaper drone is flying. It's actually circling, uh, in Jordanian airspace and it's looking, the camera's looking almost exactly due north, maybe just a couple of degrees, uh, to the east, but basically due north at, uh, a very remote area in Syria. And this, this black line here is the Jordanian Syrian border. Um, and you'll see the, the footage that, that, um, that, that will show shortly is divided into two clips and, um, and there's a, bit of a separator there and the, the drone actually flies about two miles north, northeast, uh, in that, in that brief period of time. We don't have a timestamp, so we don't know how long,

• 20:22Speaker 03

  um, how long, uh, in between that, um, the, the two clips, but, um, we, we do know that the drone is circling. So it's, it's, you can tell, and I'll, I'll get into this in a second, but it is conducting, if you're looking at the drone, from a bird's eye view, just like this, it's flying in a counterclockwise circle while keeping an eye on, uh, on this area in Syria with its, uh, with this sensor, with this infrared sensor. Uh, just, just some background, this, this area of Syria is, uh, Suede province, which has seen, uh, saw a lot of, um, ISIS and jihadist activity. So it's not surprising, and I say this intentionally, it's not surprising that we had surveillance assets, uh, looking at, you know, villages and, and, and surveying, uh, this area. Um, and I'll get that, I'll,

• 21:08Speaker 03

  expand on that in a bit. Um, now here is, I'm,

• 21:14Speaker 03

  Cutting to the chase slightly because I'm giving folks a look at the actual, the object. It's the closest I can describe this is, you know, something akin to, to a mushroom perhaps. But I'll just give folks a very, very quick overview of what we see on this display. And this is a very standard MQ nine display. I want to emphasize that nothing I'm seeing here is classified. There's plenty, plenty of footage, open source, available out on the internet. There's videos pulled out by the military with all of this symbology. There's nothing, nothing classified here. The fact that we were, that the United States was, was flying surveillance assets in Syria should not be classified. And I say all that for a reason, which I'll get into in a bit, but up here we see the heading, the aircraft heading.

• 21:59Speaker 03

  So this is in the second portion of the video. So this is roughly flying roughly west. It's going to be more west, southwest. So two seven zeros do west. This thing is, is, is pointed, the nose is pointed west, southwest. This is the, the azimuth angle. That is, that is the, the direction that the camera is pointed. So it's pointed 100 degrees to the right. So, so think of directly to your right, perpendicular to your right is 90 degrees. So it's, it's basically your, your four o'clock position. The camera's pointed to the four o'clock position, looking behind and to the right of, of the actual, of the, the nose of the aircraft. This is the aircraft position and altitude.

• 22:41Speaker 03

  I did a pretty darn close check and all the numbers check out. It's flying in a, in a circular kind of a, an orbit. And going, I think I came out to about 120 knots, which matches up with a, a Reaper's kind of cruising loitering speed. But folks that are interested, they can input these values into Google Earth or Google Maps. They can see exactly where this object was over time. Down here is.

• 23:08Speaker 03

  The the military coordinates is called MGRS. It's basically a specialized, it's a it's basically the military's version of latitude and longitude. It's a very precise down to a couple of feet. It's kind of the military's own lat-long system. So that tells us where the camera is pointed, where on the ground, what what position over the earth, right? What what ground position that camera is looking at? And people, there's, if folks are interested, they can go online, their MGRS converters. So you just plug these numbers into the converter and then you can convert to latitude, longitude and map it. I'm not going to spend too much time on on these numbers. This is elevation above sea level for that ground location. This is the bearing.

• 23:51Speaker 03

  So the direction the camera is looking relative to to the the target. Slant range, ground range, field of view height, field of view width. Not relevant really to to the discussion here. The laser is not firing. The laser will will designate and also get ranging, really precise ranging, but it is, to the best of my understanding, not firing at this point. So we're not getting, we're not getting a precise range off of this to this object. And this is just like, this is the the left-right kind of metric of where the camera is pointing. The elevation angle shows where relative to the the camera's nose, how far down, in this case, it's eight degrees

• 24:36Speaker 03

  down below the aircraft's nose. So it's looking, as we can, as you can see from the footage, we're looking down at the ground. This right here is an indicator of of whether the object is locked. That that'll change over the course of the video. This is incredibly important because this tells us we are in black hot. That means objects that are warmer, hotter, are going to appear darker, they're going to appear black, and objects that are colder, and that is very important, cold objects appear lighter. And throughout the the course of this video, this object, intriguingly enough, despite maneuvering and doing this apparent instantaneous acceleration, is colder, colder than its surroundings, which is interesting aircraft.

• 25:18Speaker 03

  Generally going to be warm friction on the on the skin of the aircraft will will make them appear warm.

• 25:22Jeremy Corbell?

  We've seen that. We've seen that before, and that is something that is indicative of UAP. Is that the propulsion itself, it doesn't give the the same heat signatures that you'd anticipate. I'm just curious, when you're looking at the, you said like a mushroom's shape, it is like lenticular on the top and it's got a little bit of a bottom. Is this, is this, are we seeing, we're seeing the thermal signature, but oftentimes we see the shape too, like you would see wings on this if it was a plane or something at this.

• 25:54Speaker 03

  That's right. And I have, that's absolutely right, Jeremy. I have a couple of examples of that that I can show. Maybe after we show the video, you're absolutely right. And and we'll we'll get into kind of theories of what it could be. Maybe after I showed the, after we show the clip. Uh, this little indicator right here shows where north is. And as I mentioned, the camera is pointed basically due north. So that means that once the, if the camera, if this indicator is up at the top here, that means we are indeed looking north. If it were down here, that means we are looking south. It's it's kind of that simple. It's very intuitive. Uh, and this over here is the zoom and the the field of view, which basically is means the lens. Uh, and we'll see that the operator cycle through. Um, and I believe this is four times digital zoom. So I think this is about as close as we can get. This is zoomed in as far as we can.

• 26:39Speaker 03

  Um, I'll just very quickly note, there are two minor little oddities that I noted. Um, that I don't think are are a major deal, but but I did notice and we'll we'll see, we'll see on the, in the, the other footage in the, in the video that there are uh, brackets around the corners of, uh, of the screen. Um, there, the bracket in the bottom left that is usually there is not there. So that could be a quirk of that particular system. I'm not sure what that is. And the other quirk that I noticed was the uh, elevation above sea level does not change over the course of the video. So that could be a setting that the operators do, but I think I I braised that because this video, again, on its face is so profound that I think we need to be very, very meticulous about

• 27:22Speaker 03

  everything about it. I think if we're going to come out and say that this shows what we think it does. Um, we need to be very, very, again, very meticulous about every, every little detail.

• 27:33Jeremy Corbell?

  All I ever say is it's sure they think it is that that was the whole thing. There was a full, you know, examination done and it was their words. This is instantaneous acceleration UAP. But but yes, when people look at it, then, you know, we have to, you know, decide is that correct?

• 27:50Speaker 03

  And Exactly. But I will say everything else, everything tracks. I mean, this is you can again, look at plenty of examples online of an MQ nine display. Again, nothing classified. It's a perfect match with all this data. So I I have very little doubt that this is legit, but I did want to flag all those little caveats. That said, the other, once, once I watched the video a few times, Jeremy, I, I remembered seeing this, this Office of Director of National Intelligence source was quoted in a Daily Mail article from back from October of 2022. I believe this is from Josh Boswell. And the operator describes quite literally what we are about to see. He describes, you know,

• 28:35Speaker 03

  an MQ nine. So we have the platform, an MQ nine Reaper drone. The source describes the the exact scenario that we see in this video, a town, basically a rural area of Syria. And again, you can check that with the with the the coordinates. And then the source describes what we appear to see in the video, an orb. The operator chases this orb and then, and I'm going to quote here, the the source says, then it will do something remarkable, like suddenly bolt off the screen. So again, we have platform, location and observed behavior. So that gives me even more confidence that this is, this is something this video, I suspect, has done the rounds within

• 29:21Speaker 03

  the intelligence community within, within the, you know, the military and has certainly potentially garnered some, some inquisitive folks. And so I think that's, that's fascinating to have this, this, this description match precisely what what we appear to see in the video.

• 29:38Jeremy Corbell?

  That's amazing. You found that. I had never remembered that. I'm gonna hear it from, you know, people that control Reapers and, you know, people that are pilots that they'll see these, you know, sharp angle turns or these incredible speeds that Commander David Fravor talks about that. Just boom, it was there and then it wasn't. You could just barely see that it moved, you know, but you could tell. So you, we've heard about it a bunch. Now you bring up that article. That's what appears we're seeing.

• 30:07Speaker 03

  It's actually that, that article. So the, the, the date Jeremy that you had for this, uh, for this incident, I believe was 2021. That article came out in October of 2022. And here we are, what, three, three and a half years later.

• 30:21Speaker 03

  Looking at the, the literal, quite literally the, you know, what, what appears to be the video that was described there. If not, you know, there, maybe there are others and if there are.

• 30:29Jeremy Corbell?

  There's a, there's a lot of, there's a lot of others. Describing a general thing, but I mean, yeah, down to the point of Syria. So it could, it could be, I don't know.

• 30:40Jeremy Corbell?

  Well, let's play it.

• 30:42Jeremy Corbell?

  So the, the, the video we're gonna play is, uh, three minutes long. It's almost three minutes long. And that's because it, it shows these two parts. Um, there's a little flash of black between the, the first two clips. And you kind of watch it and you're like, huh? And within our intelligence agencies, they were like, huh? And so you'll see these title cards in between. Those are not my words, is what I'm gonna say. Those are not my words. And then you can see the analysis that was done. And so you'll get a repeat a few times. Okay? Let's play it.

• 31:15Speaker 05

  The following UAP video has no audio. We recommend our audio listeners to watch the full video version of this episode.

• 32:17Jeremy Corbell?

  The following UAP video has no audio. We recommend our audio listeners to watch the full video version of this episode.

• 32:28Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies. 18+.

• 32:54Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Indeed. You're ready to level up your business, but the pressure to find the right person to make that happen is intense. Indeed sponsored jobs can help carry the load. It boosts your job post to help it reach quality talent fast. Cut through the chaos with Indeed sponsored jobs. Get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring now? Then this is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.

• 34:16Speaker 03

  The following UAP video has no audio. We recommend our audio listeners to watch the full video version of this episode.

• 34:48Speaker 03

  Alright, so here we do see the operator. You can see he's in the narrow, on the top left, he's in the narrow field of view. He can zoom in further and he, the operator will, we're in black hot. This object appears to be moving left. That is almost certainly parallax, so if you can see at the top, the plane is flying east. Something is moving perpendicularly to it, so that that's almost certainly parallax. Operator tries to lock it up here and you can see that the operator is attempting to do it manually, not working. Then we had that break and now this is the second part of the clip. And at that box, you'll see, that's the operator trying to get a lock. And here we have a successful lock on this object.

• 35:32Speaker 03

  And then the operator will do a digital zoom. He's currently in ultra narrow field of view, which is about zoomed in as you can get without going into the digital zoom. And he's zoomed in, and this is as far as you can get. And here we see this odd mushroom shape. Let's call it a mushroom, no lenticular, right? There's no wings, no exhaust plume. I still locked on, and here it breaks the lock, so it appears, and then it just zips off.

• 36:02Speaker 03

  That is, um, that is quite extraordinary on its face. So let's, let's slow it down here. I think, uh, we're going to go down to 50% speed. And again, we have basically two movements that, that initial, it kind of zips off to the left, the direction change, and then it shoots off.

• 36:20Jeremy Corbell?

  Wow.

• 36:22Speaker 03

  Yeah, that's, um, wow, is, is, uh, that's all I, I've been able to say for the last few days.

• 36:27Jeremy Corbell?

  So it's clearly going away in this first part, but then you think that to the right is an actual movement of the object.

• 36:35Speaker 03

  I do, and I think that this, as you get down to 25%, 5% speed, um, it, it becomes quite apparent and I, you know, I'll, I'll run through a couple hypotheses for what, what could explain it. And then I think we can, I think we can rule those out. Um, but we'll, we'll let this video finish playing.

• 36:56Jeremy Corbell?

  Uh, this was their examination of a shape. They were doing kind of sharpening techniques to try to define the shape of the object.

• 37:07Speaker 03

  At times it's almost vaguely gimbal-like, um, but, uh, yeah, that's pretty remarkable.

• 37:14Jeremy Corbell?

  But the movement is here, let's watch this last one. Yeah. To highlight UAP's shape, their wording.

• 37:19Speaker 03

  Right, right.

• 37:26George Knapp?

  And if we're seeing this visually, not on the thermal, uh, sensor, um, what might it look like? Would it just be round that we'd see in the sky or?

• 37:35Speaker 03

  That's a, George, that's a really good question. I, I think there's enough, I, I, I'm venturing into speculation territory, but, but the shape and I'll show you just in a, in a second here, I'll show you kind of what, um, that, that's actually kind of a great jumping off point. So let me, um, let me, uh, kind of to, to answer your question, George. Um, we'll, we'll look at, for example, some, some footage of, um, of drones, uh, known drones, right? These are, these are, we've, we've identified these as drones. We know they're drones from the footage that they came from. Um, so here's our, here's our, our friend. Um,

• 38:16Speaker 03

  And these are all known drones. You'll notice that even in lower from further away and lower fidelity infrared video, you can still see the body basically of an aircraft and the wing structure, right? Even here, you can see the wing structure and the body of the aircraft clearly visible here. And then a quadcopter, of course, you know, has a very distinct shape and outline in infrared and it looks absolutely nothing like like this.

• 38:43Jeremy Corbell?

  No wings, no tail, no rotors, no exhaust, no plumes of heat.

• 38:47Speaker 03

  Exactly. And and just to my point about this kind of footage not being classified, this is all out there. This is actually footage from the exact same sensor platform and MQ nine. These are all, believe it or not, this is in what we're looking at is an MQ nine taking video of other MQ nines on a runway. And you can see we're in white hot, W H T. The engines in the back are hot and they are, believe it or not, they're white. Uh, you see that you see the exhausts right from these F 16s. Now, George, to your to your question, uh, these look like F C, these look like fighter jets. These look like drones. That most certainly does not look like any kind of conventional aircraft that that I can think of.

• 39:29Jeremy Corbell?

  Yeah. Remember, George, we put out um a U A P that we had documentation. We knew for sure it had been fired on and people kind of laughed at me at first. When I said we fire upon U A P on a regular basis. Well, it's because I'm getting reports from within commands. People reach out to me. They tell me when events happen. And this one, I we ended up obtaining an image of, and I was kind of embarrassed to put it out. Kind of looked like Kermit the Frog, but we called it Syria Dome U A P because it's the best way we could describe it. It was a dome shape and that's kind of what I'm seeing in this image, Merrick, is, uh, you know, it appears to be dome shaped with, you know, man, it looks like one of those weird ass like, uh, was it Gulf Breeze images? Remember those?

• 40:12Speaker 03

  Bizarre, Jeremy. Guys, it is. It is truly bizarre and I want to quickly, if I may, because I I I want to address, I think, the the first thought that I had, hey, man, maybe this is the the the sensor operator jerking the camera around and that that this is, you know, This is because that could that could and we saw that in the the famous tic tac video. There's one moment, um, I think about midway through the video where the where the operator changes the field of view, basically changes the lens system and it looks like it shoots off. Um, and and we can actually, we can, we can investigate that hypothesis. Um, and so if you guys don't mind, I'll, I'll kind of, uh, I'll pull up what I.

• 40:48Jeremy Corbell?

  Clear for the average person because you're so technical, it takes me a second to understand. Man, when I first saw it, right? I mean, of course I have some background on it, but I thought the instantaneous motion was when it started going away, what looked like away from the camera. And that was so impressive. And then that little thing to the right, I was like, no way, they had to have moved the camera, just be in all of that thing moved away. But the, the, the idea you're having is that they were examining the instantaneous motion, not just the incredible shoot away. But then that move to the right was the actual instantaneous motion.

• 41:24Speaker 03

  That's what, that's what, uh, is really, um, I'm struggling to, to understand here and that it does seem to indicate that that was, um, indeed, uh, uh, a very anomalous. Maneuver and, and an example again of that, um, that instantaneous acceleration observable. So I will, I'll quickly, um, I'll share, let's see if this works here. Um, I do want to investigate this, uh, this, this theory potentially that this could be, uh, the sensor operator rapidly inadvertently moving, uh, the, the camera. Um, to the side and, and I don't think that that's the case because, um, we actually see the operator, once it shoots off to the right or appears to shoot off to the right.

• 42:06Speaker 03

  Um, the, the operator actually does precisely that. The operator moves the camera because operator wants to, wants to find this thing and, and where did it go? Um, so we do have an example there. It goes off to the right and then here I'm going to go frame by frame. He, the operator. Rapidly moves that camera to the right. You can see the whole background, everything, the entire scene. Shifts from right to left. So this is what we would be seeing if the operator had indeed, um, moved that camera and that. Could have been the right if if folks want to say that that's what explains that instantaneous acceleration. We don't see that when that object shoots off to the right.

• 42:45Speaker 03

  And there's another way, I think, and even just another way to analyze this and give us even more confidence that this is not some some camera artifact. And that is is that the the object moves left to right. So it has this apparent rightward motion. First of all, it moves kind of left and it it appears to to really make a course change. And then it shoots off to the right. But we see that the background actually, if we take, if we look very, very closely, the background is actually moving perpendicularly as a result of of parallax. Kind of the just the way the plane is moving. The background appears to move from from basically downwards from top to bottom. And and we'll I'll show that here.

• 43:28Speaker 03

  So here the object zips off and you can see the background moving downwards. But we can, we can do it even even more slowly. We'll go frame by frame here. There goes the object. It it shoots off to the right and we're going to stop here. And we'll go frame by frame and we'll see the there's a couple of features, darker features that move straight down. Even while the object is still visible, moving right, the background is moving downwards. And that, to me, is a very strong indicator that that this object did what it appears to do. And and as remarkable as it is, despite any observable propulsion, just zips off.

• 44:09Speaker 03

  And no technology that I know of can can do anything remotely remotely close to that. And and people will say, OK, maybe it's China. OK, if China has this kind of technology, we're all screwed. I'll just be out be honest with you. We're totally screwed. You can just drop a nuke anywhere in the world and instantaneously. And beyond that, what would what would China be doing? Flying ultra advanced technology over the Syrian desert? They haven't, there's absolutely no reason for them to be doing that.

• 44:41Jeremy Corbell?

  But man, this is just blowing my mind just that, you know, as like a. I understand everything you said and

• 44:47Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 44:48Jeremy Corbell?

  I, you know, I had a, an idea, but I, I thought at first, just that first movement was so impressive. That was the instantaneous motion, but the way you're showing how the ground movement keeps going in the same direction as the thing does this instantaneous shot to the right. I, I am convinced more than ever now that that is correct. I mean, this reminds me of, you know, exactly what Commander Fravor talked about.

• 45:14Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 45:15Jeremy Corbell?

  He, he can't describe it even. It's in, it's inhuman. It breaks the, our ideas of physics that something can do that.

• 45:23Speaker 03

  It's, it's interesting on many levels, Jeremy, to your point about that first, it literally breaks, it appears, I'll just, I'll caveat all this. It appears to break the lock. Like you said, it does that kind of up and it's like a, if you're looking at the video, right? It's kind of like a counterclockwise movement. It appears to maneuver, no wings. That, that, that alone is extraordinary. That alone is positive lift. That is, right? That's maneuvers without wings, control surfaces, flaps, um, uh, right? Engines, exhaust, plumes, props. So it breaks that lock and then it just shoots off and, and, and that is, um, I, I don't have a good answer. Again, having looked at the, the, the most obvious and apparent hypothesis that, that this is a camera movement.

• 46:05Speaker 03

  This is a, you know, it's a, a, an error by the operator or a field of view change. If you can see at the top, the field of view does not change and it doesn't matter because either way, the background would move with the object. If that were the case, and we can quite clearly see, um, that that is not the case. So I, this is, this is, this is truly extraordinary in, in my opinion.

• 46:28Jeremy Corbell?

  And George, one, one thing that like really stuck out to me, just from like a, a weapons platform, you know, standpoint. And this is a thing I know a little bit about, you know, I've looked at a lot of these videos over time and I always look at the, it's rate G at first says. And that's the first thing you see when something is beginning to kind of track. It's the systems like starting to compute, I think, relative motion. So it's like basically computing relative motion. And when the target gets like centered, you see that next and stable enough. The software then displays this thing called point P O I N T and you see it on on the left. And that's, you know, kind of making the the aim point from how I understand it.

• 47:09Jeremy Corbell?

  But then finally, when it has a solid lock on the target to where a system. Like it computes that it it can fire like a controls, they call it a control solution. You know, launch a hellfire or whatever it needs to do. Um, that's when you finally see our point. And that's what it says, our point on the left displayed on the screen. That motherfucker was rock solid locked by the Reaper's weapon system. When it, when it decided to shoot the fuck off.

• 47:40George Knapp?

  Yeah, just from my uneducated viewpoint, it's moseying along at whatever speed it is. We get a lock on it. Oh, boy, we got a lock on it. It and it realizes, oh, you got a lock on me. Here, follow this dude. See ya.

• 47:52Speaker 03

  And it it's it's fascinating. It's um, I'm I'm engaging purely in speculation here. But gentlemen, to your both of your points, it's almost like it's showing off, right? It's like, oh, look what I can do. I can break your lock and then shoot off, right? It's uh, it's pretty extraordinary on its face, I think. Look, the the bottom line is I want I want the release of this video to spur some serious attention. Like we have the age of disclosure. Great, phenomenal, that he did incredibly well, right? Um, but this is this is what we're talking about. This is what we want. We want this this critical mass to form. We want more interest. I want this, I want this video to blow the minds of every scientist that looks at it, right? I I want them to be so perplexed that they actually become um, interested, fascinated, almost maybe obsessed with this topic.

• 48:36Speaker 03

  Because that right there, there's no easy explanation for that uh, for that video.

• 48:40Jeremy Corbell?

  This may be video evidence and proof of one of the observables for the first time in the public history. This could be.

• 48:48Speaker 03

  It's quite extraordinary. Can I, can I add maybe, sorry, go ahead, George?

• 48:51George Knapp?

  Yeah, I was just gonna, just dumb question. Do we know how fast that thing is traveling when we first see it? And then can you guess about the speed when it?

• 49:00Speaker 03

  I have a hunch. I did a very, very basic back of the envelope calculation. It all depends on range. That's the, that's the key. We don't have the range, just like the other video. And this kind of comes back to that. But the, the beauty of this video is we don't need the range to know that it's doing something pretty extraordinary, right? Again, breaking that lock without wings or propulsion or flaps, right? And then shooting off, range is irrelevant at that point, when, when you, when you see something do that. And, you know, look, the other, the only other thing I could potentially think of, which it kind of fails immediately is a balloon. A balloon wouldn't change direction. It could, maybe if it, if it's punctured right,

• 49:42Speaker 03

  it could shoot off like at a party, but again, a balloon is not going to change direction. And, and the only balloons that would look anything like that are latex balloons. And from my understanding, they, they don't, they wouldn't shoot off. They just kind of, they kind of shred and they deflate slowly. So I'm, I'm trying to think of any, any possible prosaic explanation for this. And I, I'm still coming up short.

• 50:04George Knapp?

  Would our sensor systems keep a lock on a balloon even if it popped a hole in it?

• 50:10Speaker 03

  I, I think, again, you know, I, I would hope so. I, I don't know. These, these systems are designed to track ground targets. So, so it's not designed to track the fast movements of a fighter jet, for example. That's not the primary kind of role of, of these, of these camera systems. But again, that, that, that, that I, that instantaneous acceleration, departure off to the right is, is, is not something that, you know, that, that I've ever seen in any other footage.

• 50:41Speaker 03

  I mean, can I just, I'll add maybe one more, one more item, and I think this is, this is important, but I do want to raise this, and that is, you guys remember the, the OD and I, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence source that was quoted, describing basically exactly this video? That individual was quoted further in this article, and the individual basically says, you know, the Pentagon and the intelligence community are, they're self-congratulatory, they're patting themselves on the back because, oh gee whiz, they solved half of the, you know, half of the UAP reports that have been filed and sent to them.

• 51:25Speaker 03

  But I'm gonna quote the source here, "We don't give a crap about the ones they've resolved." Yeah, there are balloons up there, and balloons are sometimes mistaken for UAP, but there are shitloads of classified videos that are pretty profound and pretty clear. They don't want to talk about this stuff because they really, really don't know what the hell they are, and that's the truth. And I raise this and I bring this quote up because, again, that source now has more credibility because that source described pretty much exactly what we saw on that video. And this, this is where I, my blood kind of begins to boil because there's absolutely no reason for that footage to have been classified. There's, it's not surprising that we were surveilling rural, that part of rural Syria,

• 52:10Speaker 03

  what, four, five years ago now, it's, there's nothing classified.

• 52:13Jeremy Corbell?

  I don't, I'm not qualified to know any of that, you know, I don't, I don't know, never ask.

• 52:19Speaker 03

  And this is my personal opinion, there's absolutely no reason for that stuff to be classified. Again, that, that symbology is all over in the public domain. That is pretty profound footage, and, and there is a, there is, the public has a right to see that kind of footage, and, and they've clearly been hiding it. And this is what really makes me, sorry to go on a rant here, gentlemen, but this has been going on for 80 years. This is a letter from the Chief of Intelligence at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base to the Air Force Chief of staff in November of nineteen forty eight and he basically says the exact same thing as this source yeah if the press or the public asks tell them we've it's all balloons we've

• 53:02Speaker 03

  resolved a whole bunch of it and there's there's really nothing to see here and it's quite literally this is the playbook that eighty years has been followed that there is profound compelling highly anomalous stuff out there and it is being hidden away and that that really that is unconscionable and again I don't see any reason for this stuff to be classified I think I think arrow needs to step up and and look if Dr kozlosky the director of the all domain anomaly resolution office the Pentagon's UAP analysis office he seemed to be fairly open if he's been blocked stonewalled then he needs to resign right this is this is outrageous that this kind of footage is being withheld from from the public for just

• 53:46Speaker 03

  just for the sake of analysis but also because it could very well be as as profound as it as it appears to be

• 53:54Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a fifty-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses setup required compatibility and availability varies eighteen plus.

• 54:20Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Indeed. You're ready to level up your business, but the pressure to find the right person to make that happen is intense. Indeed sponsored jobs can help carry the load. It boosts your job post to help it reach quality talent fast. Cut through the chaos with Indeed sponsored jobs. Get a seventy-five-dollar sponsored job credit at indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring now? Then this is a job for Indeed sponsored

• 54:50George Knapp?

  So there's no additional information if they were to open this up. Is there anything else attached to that that could be potentially troubling if our adversaries knew it?

• 55:01Speaker 03

  I I I'm I'm racking my brain here, right, George? So again, the the I'm thinking of of any potential harm to national security here. And and and and classification is is that's how classification systems are designed. It's it's what is the harm to national security? Is it grave, significant, severe, whatever, you know, whatever? And that's that's what determines the various levels of classification. Again, not surprising that we had Reaper drones looking at that particular portion of the desert in Syria. Not surprising at all, zero. There's been a change in government since that video has been recorded. The the security situation has changed dramatically in Syria.

• 55:42Speaker 03

  So again, it generally it the the reasons for classification are capability. So sensor platform or location. And again, I don't see any plausible reason why, again, there's public imagery of this of this type of footage out there in the in the wild, put out by the military. And there I just don't see any logical reason why the location, again, what was this? Five years ago now, why that should be classified.

• 56:08George Knapp?

  All right, Arrow, you have access to everything. That's what to tell us. You want to be transparent. Go get this, the rest of this data and let us take a look at it. Let the public analyze it if if you're not going to do it.

• 56:20Speaker 03

  And and Arrow frankly needs to where are taxpayers taxpayer dollars going? They they were silent after that Yemen hellfire video that was released during a congressional hearing last year. Not a peep, nothing after and, you know, they're they're literally can see the metrics. Tens of millions of views that video has received across various news and media platforms. Not a peep. So what what is our government? What is our Pentagon? Where are tax dollars going? We have an office specifically specifically tasked congressionally tasked to to investigate this kind of stuff. Not a peep out of them. So they better, look, at a bare minimum, they should confirm whether they have this this footage in their holdings. Does Arrow even have this footage? I don't know the answer to that question, but we can start there.

• 57:06Jeremy Corbell?

  Yeah, I mean, I'll say this is it's really a dance as journalists, George and I try to figure out, you know, can we put something out, you know, we, you know, we're, we're trying to follow all the rules here with journalism. There's so much that comes, I'll say, in front of our eyes that we can't, we just can't, you know, and there's a lot of reasons embedded within some of the things you just said, that would be those reasons that journalists don't report on certain things, you know, but this one doesn't have any of that. There's no indication to me that we had zero indication that that this is not something that is acceptable to the public. So the public has always been asking for more data. And, you know, good

• 57:49Jeremy Corbell?

  or bad, that's what we're trying to do is put our best foot forward and showed and just enrich the data set that's out there on UAP with videos. So this is not like a trust me, bro situation. You see it now. You analyze it. We don't usually do this, Merrick. We don't usually do a whole analysis of it because we're not experts at it, me and George. You know, usually we put it out. We say, okay, here's another piece of data, you know, take out your knives and dissect it. But it was really fun and neat and interesting for you to give us some background. It allows me to kind of understand and see what I'm looking at kind of better now. I think we should play the footage again or something like that, you know, in the episode, but just thank you so much for breaking that

• 58:33Jeremy Corbell?

  down for everybody. Let's bottom line it here. I am very impressed with this footage and believe it to be showing something at this point, I believe it to be showing something truly extraordinary that we have heard throughout history and from pilots, but I had never seen footage of it until now.

• 58:56Speaker 03

  And Jeremy and George, thank you, first of all, for bringing me in. It's truly an honor to break this stuff down for you. But congratulations on getting this out. This is, again, in my book, this is extraordinary footage, after an initial analysis at least. And, and thank you. Thank you for driving the conversation forward, because this is the kind of stuff, again, you know, with, with, when you add all the congressional hearings and the age of disclosure and all that we've seen over the last several years, you guys are driving the conversation forward. So, so thank you for, for everything that you're doing.

• 59:30George Knapp?

  Thanks, Merrick. By the way, I'm always the optimist of our duo. Jeremy is the pessimist and we might have a reason to have you come back real soon. It's possible.

• 59:40Speaker 03

  Interesting. I'm intrigued.

• 59:43Jeremy Corbell?

  Is it a threat or a promise?

• 59:45Speaker 03

  Yeah, exactly.

• 59:46Jeremy Corbell?

  Hey, Merrick, thanks so much, man. We'll see you. We'll see you soon.

• 59:49George Knapp?

  Jeremy, I'm trying to remember when we sat down in the hotel room and recorded a little session about this particular video clip and how long ago that was, six months ago, maybe, or something like that?

• 1:00:01Jeremy Corbell?

  I wouldn't know time, George.

• 1:00:02George Knapp?

  Anticipating that someday we hope to release it. And we're, you know, giving our best shot at trying to figure out what we're seeing on the screen. And then you hear someone as bright and as knowledgeable as Merrick, and I can't help but feel like an idiot compared to him. But that was, that was very welcome analysis. And now the rest of the world can take a look at it and make up their own minds about it.

• 1:00:22Jeremy Corbell?

  Absolutely. It's about enriching the data set and putting it out. Now, I will say, though, this is not just like some, you know, video that just could be anything. We have to stress this. This is labeled UAP by your intelligence agencies and government. It was part of an extensive analysis done because it's a UAP on specifically the apparent instantaneous acceleration. So when you see those cards between, that's what, so I created those cards based on my knowledge set, right? Word for word. I mean, so if you, if you think about it, this is their investigation into instantaneous acceleration.

• 1:01:07Jeremy Corbell?

  Man, can you imagine how much more there is that show extraordinary capabilities like this? That just, it's conversation stoppers. You're like, okay, there is stuff that can move in ways that everybody has told us UAP can do, you know, for decades and decades, if not centuries now. It's really fascinating.

• 1:01:27George Knapp?

  You know, we're told over and over, month after month, this is a new era of transparency. We want to be transparent. We want to get to the bottom of this, analyze these videos and cases, photos and evidence, and figure out what it is. If it's, if it's something we don't know, then we'll say it. Well, time to get off the pot, I'd say. There's no reason, as Merrick says, there's no reason why the public can't see that kind of video, that, uh, there have to be extraordinary steps taken to share it with the public, uh, both in the US and around the world. And there's so much more similar kinds of clips that exist in, in servers. Um, and there's no reason to hold it back. If not just from us, what about Congress?

• 1:02:11George Knapp?

  There's a task force at Congress that is seeking this information. Why can't you share it with them as, as a first step? You know, time to, time to live up to the ideals that are supposedly the reason that Arrow was created in the first place.

• 1:02:25Jeremy Corbell?

  We'll do our best. We'll, we'll stick to, uh, the way we've been doing things, which is very carefully and slowly, but I think, um, you know, we'll keep going.

• 1:02:35George Knapp?

  Yeah, there are reasons to be suspicious, a- as we know, and those reasons, I think, will eventually come out, uh, the, some of the subterfuge that's going on right now, right now. But in the meantime, it's birthday time. It's time for you to have some fun. Hope you enjoy your birthday. Hope people don't razz you too much on social media now that they know about it, and, uh, I'll talk to you soon.