What The Label Of ‘Genius’ Tells Us About Our Society

In “The Genius Myth,” Helen Lewis argues that who we call a genius reveals more about our values than any objective measure of brilliance.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  WNYC is supported by Bear. Science is about asking questions, testing, trying again. It's not easy, but it's relentless. It evolves, and that's why science delivers. Learn more at sciencedelivers.com.

• 0:14Ira Flatow?

  Science Friday is supported by MathWorks, creator of MATLAB and Simulink software for technical computing and model-based design. MathWorks, accelerating the pace of discovery in engineering and science. Learn more at mathworks.com.

• 0:31Speaker 02

  Support for Science Friday comes from USA for UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency. Here's a problem. How do you keep a house above freezing when the windows are gone and the power is out for 16 hours a day? In Ukraine this winter, the answer fits in a box. Reflective insulation, plastic sheeting to cover broken windows, draft blockers for the doors. Simple materials installed the same day a team arrives. Your gift delivers them, and until December 31st, it's matched. Donate at unrefugees.org/friday.

• 1:08Ira Flatow?

  Hi, this is Ira Flatow, and you're listening to Science Friday. Today on the show, how to define genius.

• 1:18Speaker 03

  People will say to me, but you know, some people are just smarter than other people. That's what geniuses are. And actually, that's really not how we award the label.

• 1:30Ira Flatow?

  What makes someone a genius? Are they the smartest, most creative, most innovative people? How about those with the highest IQ? Well, my next guest argues that who we consider a genius tells us much more about what we value as a society than any objective measure of brilliance. And without a compelling or quirky life story, you're unlikely to be elevated to the level of genius. Joining me now to explore the complicated and coveted status of genius is my guest, Helen Lewis, staff writer at The Atlantic, author of the book The Genius Myth: A Curious History of a Dangerous Idea. Welcome to Science Friday.

• 2:12Speaker 03

  Thank you very much for having me.

• 2:14Ira Flatow?

  You're welcome. Now, anybody who starts a book with a curious history of a dangerous idea, I gotta ask, what do you mean a dangerous idea?

• 2:21Speaker 03

  Well, I think it's something that people get wrong, don't they? I mean, I've been having lots of conversations around this book where people will say to me, but you know, some people are just smarter than other people. That's what geniuses are. And actually, that's, that's really not how we award the label. It usually goes to somebody who encapsulates some quality that we like, or we find that their life stories are kind of parable. So somebody like Stephen Hawking would be a good example. You know, there are lots of physicists of his generation with equivalent achievements, but he's the one who became a kind of pop culture celebrity. He's the one who got to be in The Simpsons because people found his personal story so inspiring. So he had ALS, a progressive form of muscular dystrophy, and ended up in a wheelchair. And people found that idea that somebody's brain was

• 3:04Speaker 03

  still active even as their body was failing them, just quite profoundly moving. And so he became this, this different kind of figure within science than, as I say, any other, you know, Roger Penrose or anybody else of the same generation, whose work on paper was, was just as good.

• 3:20Ira Flatow?

  Mm hmm. Or Elon Musk, as you start your book with.

• 3:24Speaker 03

  Yeah, I felt I had to start with Elon Musk because everybody was having this big argument about him at the time. And actually, I think what happened to him at DOGE, the Department for Government Efficiency, really, it kind of shows what the argument that I was trying to make in the book, which is that there was a feeling among people who were very smart at coding and engineering, that every problem was a coding problem, as if, you know, you just throw more computing power at a problem and that solves it. And actually, I mean, you know, you will know this as well as me, I'm sure, political problems are often very knotty, simply because they involve people. And so I think Elon Musk went into DOGE thinking, here's me and my crack team of smart 21 year olds, and we're going to look at the code base of the US government, clean it up, and then that will

• 4:07Speaker 03

  improve things. And look, what has happened? He's got nowhere near the $2 trillion of savings that he promised. And actually, most of the people involved in that, including him, have come out of it feeling quite bruised and kind of with a sense of why didn't this work? And to me, that's the absolute paradigm of you throw a load of quote unquote geniuses at a problem, and guess what? The problem is a bit more difficult than perhaps the people involved realize it because they value one type of intelligence and one type of genius.

• 4:34Ira Flatow?

  Yeah, so they are really good at very narrow things, but the social consequences or social graces might be lacking.

• 4:41Speaker 03

  Right, and politics is the out of making people do what you want, or convincing them that ideas that you have were things that they've always believed themselves anyway, you know. It's fundamentally about people's skills.

• 4:51Ira Flatow?

  Have we lost the idea then of a political genius, someone who is so smart, changed the paradigm and everybody's excited about that person?

• 5:02Speaker 03

  Well, there are different, you know, types of genius. I think politics is a place where you can make a version of what we would have once called kind of great man theory, that there are certain individuals who really do change the course of history. But science, I think, is very different to that. So one of the things I found during my research, which was most mind blowing, is this 1922 paper called Our Inventions: Inevitable. And it goes through, it's not quite a famous paper, goes through all of the things that got invented basically around the same time. And thinkers like Stephen Johnson and Malcolm Gladwell are kind of, I think, slightly obsessed with this paper, because it overturns everything you think about how scientific discoveries happen. It suggests instead that they're kind of, when the preconditions of them have been met, somebody will get there, you know?

• 5:46Speaker 03

  Three people discovered nitrogen in the air in the same year, you know, that was just kind of ready to happen, essentially.

• 5:52Ira Flatow?

  Right. Ideas happen, I'm thinking of Isaac Newton and calculus, he wasn't the only one.

• 5:58Speaker 03

  Oh, I mean, I love Isaac Newton because he's such a fantastic historical figure, but yeah.

• 6:04Ira Flatow?

  Talk about genius, you know?

• 6:05Speaker 03

  And hailed as a genius. And what's really interesting about him is, well, two things I think are fascinating from his story. One is that obviously, the discovery of gravity, incredible breakthrough in science, brilliant. But that wasn't what he spent most of his life doing. He spent most of his life obsessed with alchemy, trying to turn base metals into gold, and with biblical chronology, i.e. working out exactly when events in the Bible could have happened historically. So he spent a lot of time down kind of dead ends. And then the other thing is, as you mentioned, one of the things he's most famous for now is the simultaneous discovery of calculus, and spending many, many years trying to destroy his rival's reputation and make sure that he got the credit for it. And you do find that story in a lot of self-proclaimed geniuses, right?

• 6:47Speaker 03

  That they want it, they go after it, they're not very willing to share the limelight.

• 6:52Ira Flatow?

  Boy, is that true. I mean, as a science journalist, I could name a couple of names there, but.

• 6:57Speaker 03

  Well, I would love if you did, but I think it's really fascinating. You know, I talked to Walter Isaacson a while ago, and his book career is fascinating to me because obviously he's written biographies of Da Vinci, of Einstein, and Steve Jobs, Lately, and Elon Musk. He also wrote a book about Jennifer Doudna, of gene editing, of CRISPR. And, you know, that which has potential to be an incredibly transformative technology, but she does not have that same aura. You know, she has not been so enthusiastically playing the role of the kind of the great sage delivering a new kind of era for humankind. And I think that's very notable.

• 7:31Ira Flatow?

  Yeah. And that brings up a topic about women in science. And I think you might consider her to be a genius type for coming up with her work, but you don't historically hear the quote label of genius given to many women over the centuries, right?

• 7:47Speaker 03

  I think it's very notable. I think there's obviously, particularly historically, there are social factors. One of the things that really stood out to me in my research was that there was a brilliant female physicist of the late 19th century and early 20th century called Hertha Ayrton. And she did great work in arc lights and lots of other stuff that was very innovative at the time. She won the Hughes Medal from the Royal Society, but she couldn't join the Royal Society. You know, they only admitted women in the 1940s.

• 8:14Ira Flatow?

  Madame Curie couldn't get into.

• 8:17Speaker 03

  Right. She only got her professorship after she essentially inherited it from Pierre, her late husband. You know, that's somebody who won two Nobel Prizes in different disciplines, like one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century. One of the things I wanted to talk about is the role of collaboration. And, you know, I think we often downplay the roles of those societies and of universities. But scientists themselves through history have been really well aware of what it means to be, you know, at the edge. You need to know what everybody else is doing at the edge of the field. You need to know whether kind of interesting work is being done. And so excluding women, Black Americans were very often knocked out, and working class people knocked out, and Jewish people knocked out of the Ivy League in the beginning of the 20th century. You know, there have been large sways of Americans who have not been able to access

• 9:01Speaker 03

  the resources that they needed to fully develop their talents.

• 9:04Ira Flatow?

  Why do you think the idea of male genius is so persistent? I mean, women have been excluded from science, you know, for so many centuries. Why even now?

• 9:16Speaker 03

  I mean, I think it was always framed as the fact that women weren't as brilliant or their brains weren't up to it. And I think it was the other way around, actually, right? It was a fear of competition. It was a fear that they could compete. And you see that, you know, there was lots of discussion at the end of the 19th century about the fact that women shouldn't be admitted to universities because they didn't really have the brains for it. Now we have the opposite problem, right? That actually lots of courses are dominated at undergraduate and even top graduate level by women. So it's, you know, that clearly wasn't a problem. And there's another thing too, which I think hero worship really comes into it. When you're talking about people being held as geniuses, you're kind of really talking often about hero worship. And we know, for example, that women are quite happy to read books by both genders. Men are quite reluctant to read books written by women. And I think there's something slightly emasculating for some men.

• 10:00Speaker 03

  They feel that, you know, being kind of adoring a woman would somehow be kind of humbling to them.

• 10:08Ira Flatow?

  After the break, how Albert Einstein became synonymous with the word genius.

• 10:14Speaker 03

  He turned into a kind of public intellectual and celebrity, and he was obviously comfortable with that role.

• 10:19Ira Flatow?

  Don't go away.

• 11:00Speaker 00

  If you love learning about the natural world and meeting the scientists who help us understand it, be sure to check out the new season of Going Wild with Dr. Ray Win Grant. It's the chart-topping and Webby Award-winning podcast from the folks at Nature on PBS, now with a video companion series. In this season of Going Wild, host acclaimed wildlife ecologist Dr. Ray Win Grant heads out into the field to explore the animals, people, and stories that make nature worth saving. Stops include a hibernating black bear den in Arkansas and an underwater shipwreck site off the Florida coast. If you're looking for a place to start, check out the season's debut episode, where Ray joins beloved biologist and influencer Jordan King in the Florida Everglades to learn about his unlikely journey into science and how to study a wetland when it's not

• 11:45Speaker 00

  very, well, wet. So don't miss out. Follow Going Wild with Dr. Ray Win Grant on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. WNYC Studios is supported by Wise. Wise, the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the world. With a Wise account, you can send, spend, and receive in up to 40 currencies with only a few simple taps. Be smart, get wise. Download the Wise app today. Terms and conditions apply. WNYC is supported by Bear. Every day in America, science delivers. Not just in the headlines, but in the moments that matter most. Science is a journey, one of curiosity, persistence, and progress.

• 12:25Speaker 00

  It's about asking questions, testing, learning, and improving again and again. Science delivers harvests that feed families, tools that help farmers grow more with less, and new ways to protect land for generations to come. Let's keep asking, keep testing, keep discovering, so science can keep delivering. Learn more at sciencedelivers.com.

• 12:51Ira Flatow?

  So, speaking of hero worship, let's talk about Albert Einstein for a moment, because he is the iconic genius.

• 13:00Ira Flatow?

  His wild hair, that's like become the symbol of somebody who's a genius. What was it about him and the age he lived him that made him so much that icon of geniusness?

• 13:13Speaker 03

  I mean, I would start by saying that, and I think people often, when they think about the book, assume that it's a kind of brutal debunking of me taking a lot of great men down at the knees. And that's not true at all. I'm trying to make the picture more complicated and broader. And Einstein is a good example of this, right? Because he is undoubtedly one of the greatest scientists ever. You know, just came up with incredible breakthroughs, right? He just fundamentally changed physics. But there's lots of interesting things about him. He wasn't a particularly incredible student at university. Part of the legend is that he was working in a patent office when he made his breakthroughs because he couldn't get an academic job. But the other thing is that he turned into a kind of public intellectual and celebrity. And he was obviously comfortable with that role.

• 13:57Speaker 03

  You know, he speculated about the existence of God, you know? He took a stance on nuclear weapons. Obviously, as a refugee from Europe to America, as a Jewish refugee, he had a very strong opinions on the politics of the Second World War. You know, all of those things meant that he was essentially a sage. By the time that he died, you know, he was a celebrity. And he was the one that people had on T-shirts and they would make pilgrimages to see him. He was no longer at the forefront of where the edge of physics research was. He was a kind of elder statesman of the entire field. And it's a slightly different role.

• 14:31Ira Flatow?

  Yeah, so this was about his persona besides his achievements then.

• 14:36Speaker 03

  But also something about you, you mentioned that, you know, the kind of the wild hair and the famous picture with his tongue stuck out.

• 14:41Ira Flatow?

  Central casting in Hollywood.

• 14:43Speaker 03

  Well, but where does that idea come from, right? Because that's not an idea that people had in the 1600s of what it meant to be a genius. But the idea of that kind of childlike wonder of the genius is really an idea that kind of fully blossoms in the 18th century with Jean-Jacques Rousseau. You know, the idea that actually what's most pure in children is nature. And we corrupt it by schooling them, you know, drilling them in times tables and whatever else it might be. And since then, there's been a really high premium on that kind of, the idea of the genius as the free spirit that comes along in a couple of different ways. One of which, I have a very conflicted relationship, which was the idea of the heretic. You know, there are so many stories about the one person in science standing up to

• 15:25Speaker 03

  the kind of the establishment that doesn't get it. So Ignaz Semmelweis and the germ theory of disease, or Galileo and the heliocentric universe. And those stories are often a little bit more complicated. And then you have stories like someone like Freeman Dyson, undoubtedly a very brilliant mind, but by the end of his life, a climate change denier. You know, and he was, he wrote an essay called The Scientist is Rebel. And I think got sucked into this idea that if everyone was telling him it was wrong, then wasn't that more proof that actually he was a, he was a free thinker and it was right. And that unfortunately, you can draw a direct line from that, I think, to that kind of heterodox podcast sphere, where anything that the establishment says by definition is probably flawed and faulty. And the most fringe ideas are therefore the most interesting and shouldn't we look into them?

• 16:10Ira Flatow?

  This is Science Friday from WNYC Studios. Let's talk a bit about, I remember when I grew up, that's how old I am, when people used to talk about the role of IQ all the time, very important. Your kids get, we have to measure his or her IQ. You write that members of high IQ societies are not typically the most successful people in society. Why is that?

• 16:34Speaker 03

  Well, I've got bad news for you if you were enjoying a brief respite from the IQ discourse, because it's really come roaring back. I mean, to go back to Elon Musk, you know, one of many people in Silicon Valley who are really obsessed with IQ. You know, the people in the early 20th century were, were interested in it, you know, because they feel that there are certain kinds of superior people, maybe even superior races. So I think IQ discourse is, is coming back. But yes, one of the things I find most joyful, I'm a political journalist by background. So I spent a lot of time covering fringe political parties, which schism with delightful frequency, right? Because the stakes are quite low. No one's actually ever going to be in power of, over anything. So all they have really are their principles. And there's something similar that happens in the ultra

• 17:17Speaker 03

  high IQ society. So the one people might have heard of is Mensa. And that takes the top one to 2% of the population. But there are ones that are way, way, way beyond that. And they do become, I wouldn't say like bald men fighting over a comb, but they become kind of incredibly smart people fighting over the minutes of a meeting. You know, it just that they're propensity for people to have these, these dramatic fallings out. And also, I was getting into huge arguments about who's the smartest person is even within this cohort of very smart people, you know, people who really value their smartness often are very attached to it.

• 17:50Ira Flatow?

  Yeah. Should we retire the word genius, you think, altogether?

• 17:53Speaker 03

  I don't think we ever will. So I think my campaign against it, that wouldn't make any difference, even if I had it. I think we do want a word for something that is kind of extraordinary and for somebody that we maybe, maybe even admire, or maybe just we don't feel is kind of entirely human, right? We almost don't know how they did it.

• 18:10Ira Flatow?

  Yeah. How do we celebrate them? People who have done truly incredible and society positive things?

• 18:18Speaker 03

  I think it's a harder question than that, which is how do we celebrate teams?

• 18:22Ira Flatow?

  Teams?

• 18:22Speaker 03

  I think we have a model for celebrating individual scientists, right? Notoriously, the Nobels in the sciences can go to a maximum of three people. And there's a lot of quite low-level disgruntlement with that because, you know, inevitably it means that some people glom onto a discovery like William Shockley with the transistor, which I write about in the book, or sometimes you get a situation in which it's fairly arbitrary who gets their name on the plaque and who doesn't. I mean, I was just thinking about how much, I don't know if you, you liked it, but I really liked the film Oppenheimer.

• 18:50Ira Flatow?

  Yes.

• 18:51Speaker 03

  Because it was a very rare example of, that film is not, Oppenheimer didn't make those breakthroughs himself, right? His genius, if you want to call it that, was to bring together Enrico Fermi or Richard Feynman, these big egos, these awkward personalities, and put them together in a desert and get them to do their best work as a team. And that, we just very rarely talk about that or have a way to celebrate that.

• 19:17Ira Flatow?

  We were talking about Elon Musk, and I think as a society, we're much more likely now to hold people accountable for bad behavior, even if we review and view them as geniuses. And people seem generally delighted to see Elon Musk make a fool of himself on the national stage, and then his genius card gets revoked, even briefly. Is this the genius myth fading or changing? Or how do you look at that?

• 19:44Speaker 03

  Well, I was trying to work out, and I never quite worked out the perfect way to say it, but the idea that calling someone a genius is often a way of having an argument that a society wants to have. You're right that his genius card has been revoked, which is sort of weird when you think about it, right? And there's nothing about what he's done with the federal government that makes the achievements of Tesla or SpaceX or the Boring Company anything different from what they were before. I think people on the left think that it sort of retrospectively debunks him and everything else he's done. And I don't feel like that. I feel like he has made some really interesting and significant contributions to American scientific life. But I think his problem was it was grandiosity. He kind of came in like he was a sort of stunt motorcyclist going like, hey, stand back losers and watch this. I'm going to be amazing.

• 20:30Speaker 03

  And then if that person then falls into a lake of custard, that is inevitably quite funny. And so I think his own arrogance brought that down on him, really.

• 20:38Ira Flatow?

  You see this often, though, in people who've won Nobel prizes and are labeled as geniuses. Suddenly they think they're a genius in a field that they haven't, they know nothing about.

• 20:49Speaker 03

  Yeah, and they get treated like that. It happened to Thomas Edison, who had, you know, who was sort of treated as a kind of sage in his later life when his kind of creative juice slightly run out. And I think people get turned into a kind of 360 degree wise man. And it usually is a man. Why would somebody who is a brilliant chemist necessarily have incredibly good views on on politics, right? Any more than a politician would be able to make a breakthrough in organic chemistry.

• 21:16Ira Flatow?

  Thank you for taking time to be with us today.

• 21:18Speaker 03

  Oh, well, thank you for talking to me. I always love that. The history of science is always such a pleasure to talk about because it's filled with so many big characters who you necessarily want to spend much time with in real life, are fun to spend time with on the page.

• 21:29Ira Flatow?

  I second that. Helen Lewis, staff writer at The Atlantic and author of the book The Genius Myth, A Curious History of a Dangerous Idea. We didn't have time to get in all of the fascinating stories of genius in the book. So if you want to read more about Thomas Edison's story, go to sciencefriday.com/GeniusMyth.

• 21:55Ira Flatow?

  Hey, thanks for listening. This episode was produced by Soshana Buxbaum. See you next time. I'm Ira Flatow.