Software is Eating Labor

Software has fundamentally changed the way we record, store, and share information. Its next act is to fundamentally change the nature of our economy, capturing trillions of dollars of value in the process. In this talk from the 2025 a16z LP Summit, a16z General Partner Alex Rampell discusses the history of filing cabinets and databases, how SaaS pricing moved from seats to outcomes, and how AI agents will accelerate the trend of the last 70 years of software progress. Timecodes: 0:00 Introduction 0:27 Historical Context: Automation and Labor 3:25 The Filing Cabinet Era: Digitizing Records 4:12 Case Studies: Software Transforming Industries 8:39 The SaaS Business Model and Its Limits 11:41 Labor Market Scale vs. Software Market 12:19 The Shift: Software Doing the Job 15:44 Case Study: Job Opening 18:11 Real-World Examples: AI in Action 21:01 The Human Element: Demoralizing Jobs & Language 22:52 Market Expansion: New Opportunities with AI 26:02 Conclusion: The Future of Software and Labor Resources: Follow Alex on X: https://x.com/arampell Stay Updated: If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to like, subscribe, and share with your friends! Find a16z on X: https://x.com/a16z Find a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16z Listen to the a16z Podcast on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5bC65RDvs3oxnLyqqvkUYX Listen to the a16z Podcast on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a16z-podcast/id842818711 Follow our host: https://x.com/eriktorenberg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice, nor used to evaluate any is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details, please see a16z.com/disclosures.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Alex Rampell?

  The worldwide SaaS market is about $300 billion per year. The labor market in the US alone is 13 trillion. What software is now going after, the prize that it's going after is the labor market. Almost every software company has basically taken a filing cabinet and turned it into a database. But what's happening now is the whole thing is effectively done end to end.

• 0:25Erik Torenberg?

  Software ate the world. Now it's coming for labor. At A16Z's LP Summit, General Partner Alex Rampell, who leads the Apps Fund, took to the stage to discuss why the real market opportunity isn't the $300 billion SaaS industry. It's a $13 trillion US labor spend. From filing cabinets turned databases to AI that actually does the job, Alex breaks down outcome-based software, new pricing models, and what happens when agents sell, support, and collect on their own. Let's get into it.

• 0:58Alex Rampell?

  I'm talking about how software eats labor. First, Mark wrote an essay for the Wall Street Journal a long time ago, about 10 years ago, about how software eats the world. I guess the labor force falls within the world, so this is a natural follow-up. But if there's only one takeaway that I can leave with you today, it's that the labor market, this is almost obvious, is so much bigger than the software market. So the worldwide SaaS market is about $300 billion per year. Worldwide market cap is about $2.2 trillion. The labor market in the US alone is 13 trillion, so much, much bigger. And it doesn't mean that the software market will suddenly be worth $13 trillion a year, but what software is now going after, the prize that it's going after, is the labor market.

• 1:42Alex Rampell?

  And I figured there's nothing better than starting a venture capital conference with a picture of the world's most famous communist. That's Karl Marx right there. And if you've read Das Kapital, which I read back at college, if you remember, like, the central tenet is that there's capital and labor, and capital exploits labor. They're two distinct things. But what's really exciting, this is almost like a chemical equation, is that the capital that you give us, we give to companies. What do the companies do with the capital? They buy GPUs or rent them. They hire Engineers, they buy coffee, they give coffee and GPUs to the engineers, and then out pops software that does the job of labor. It's like the new E equals mc squared. And we're seeing this happen at so many companies, and these companies are scaling so quickly

• 2:25Alex Rampell?

  because they really are selling into clients or end users and saying, hey, we'll do this job for you. We're not giving you software. We're going to do a job for you. And that's the sales pitch. And obviously, like, this concept is not new per se. I mean, automation has been around for a long time. So, you know, seamstresses, the loom replaced those jobs, but you still had somebody that had to operate the loom. Or steamships. Sailboats and steamships obviously made that form of labor much more efficient, but you still need somebody to operate and shovel coal into the steamship and put the sails up on the mast. And then, of course, the printing press invented by Gutenberg, that was a big innovation. And the steam-powered press allowed the LA Times to print out hundreds of thousands of copies of that newspaper

• 3:08Alex Rampell?

  versus somebody manually cranking one each time. And lastly, like, the assembly line was a massive innovation in terms of replacing people that hand-assembled every gizmo. And now you have an assembly line. But, you know, a lot of people worked on the assembly line. So again, this concept is not new. Like, you could always take capital, make a machine, and then have more efficient labor on the other side. But what's happening now is the whole thing is effectively done end to end. And I want to take you through a journey of what the software market has always been, because I think understanding the past is the best window of actually understanding the future and what's possible. So my thesis is that almost every software company has basically taken a filing cabinet and turned it into a database. And this is where the $2.2 trillion of market cap has come from.

• 3:53Alex Rampell?

  This is where the $300 billion in annual software revenue has come from. And the first example that I'd like to point to is a company called Sabre Systems. This is with two As, if you've seen it. It's a company in Texas. But this was a joint project of American Airlines and IBM, back when IBM was the most powerful computer company in the world, technology company in the world. Because, at least according to ChatGPT, what would it have looked like to book an airline ticket in 1959? How did American Airlines? handle this. They probably had like lots of filing cabinets with like sheets like this. So Betty Owens calls up and says, I want to sit in seat 4A, talks to somebody on the phone, oh, wait, now actually I want to cancel my flight. They have to erase it. No, actually, I want to sit in seat 2C, erase that again. Filing cabinets basically

• 4:37Alex Rampell?

  kept track of everything. It was pretty inefficient. You had a lot of people that worked the filing cabinets. You couldn't share information from one office to another because everything was domiciled in one filing cabinet. And Sabre changed the game by putting it all on an IBM mainframe and then having lots of kind of thin client terminals that were used by travel agents around the world that could access that mainframe. And this is how travel was revolutionized. Galileo did this for hotels. Amadeus did this for Europe. I mean, like, big companies came out of this. And of course, the same process happened for sales. So I think somebody yesterday mentioned Glengarry Glen Ross, great movie. But if you remember, there were lots of business cards. You wanted to get the Glengarry leads. Those were the good leads. Those were pieces of paper. And for those of you that are old like me, you might remember a company called Ax Systems in the 1980s. This was one of

• 5:22Alex Rampell?

  the big CRM companies of the day. Goldmine followed that in 1990. And then Tom Siebel started Siebel Systems in 1993. But all of these took the filing cabinets of sales, put them originally in kind of mainframes, and then Salesforce came in 1999 and put that in the cloud. But, you know, again, the same salesperson that accessed the physical file in a fictional movie set in the 1950s would now access a Salesforce record in 2010. Same process, just different medium. Manufacturing and inventory, this is another big one. So imagine that you're a product manufacturer. How many widgets do I own? What's my inventory? What's my sales? IBM, again, at the forefront of this, but other companies, some that are around today, like SAP, started in 1972, Bond, J.D. Edwards, Epicor, Sage, I2. These are

• 6:07Alex Rampell?

  all big companies that basically digitized old fashioned records. My favorite one, just to show how pervasive this idea is, is there was actually a big business in library card catalogs. So libraries were, have been around for a very, very long time. Library of Alexandria, right? Like, long, long time. The Dewey Decimal System comes out. And when I was growing up, I'd go to like the card catalog and figure out, okay, they're all alphabetically sorted. And then eventually, somebody created, started with this company called OCLC, built a reasonably sized business and sort of innovative search dynamics of digitizing those card catalogs, where now you enter into a terminal at the computer in the library, and then you figure out where your book is. Is it in stock? Legal case files, like every time I went to a law firm in the 1980s,

• 6:50Alex Rampell?

  it's like most of the square footage was filing cabinets. And companies like PC Law, like a lot of LexisNexis and Reuters revenue comes from selling to law firms, digitizing things that would otherwise occupy so much square footage in the nice Fifth Avenue offices of law firms. My parents were accountants growing up, and I remember going to their office. And again, there was no room for a little five-year-old to run around because all filing cabinets, Intuit comes along with QuickBooks, digitized financial statements, Peachtree, this is a company from the 1970s, MYOB, like lots of companies, again, filing cabinets, filing cabinets. You get the drill here. My favorite name in the history of software is filing cabinets. The first electronic health records company was a company called Mumps, which arguably is the worst name in the history of software.

• 7:34Alex Rampell?

  It like somehow lost out to malaria or measles or something. But this was Mass General Hospital, and they wanted to replace their filing cabinets. And they came up with this programming language and database system called Mumps. But Epic and Cerner, Epic is the biggest electronic health records company in the world. It was started in 1979. So again, and what they did was just digitize these massive number of files that every hospital system and doctor would have in their office. And kind of lastly here, HR and payroll. So actually, even before Sabre, automated data processing, ADP, was started in 1949. How do you keep track of time and attendance? You had your time slip, your time cards. How do I figure out tax withholding? All of these companies came out. And again, the progression was I take the file, I put it in a mainframe,

• 8:18Alex Rampell?

  and then companies like Workday was effectively PeopleSoft. It was the same team that started PeopleSoft. They put it in the cloud, but the same process was there. The people that looked at your time and attendance slip in 1940 were the same people that looked at it in 2015. But now the medium was not paper, it was not mainframe, it was cloud. And the reason why I mention all of this is because Nothing has actually gotten that much more efficient because the filing cabinets were read by humans, the digital records are read by humans, right? It's like this woman here, whatever she's doing, looking at helping a customer with customer support needs or something, once upon a time would have looked at a piece of paper, now is looking at a computer. And the reason why this is so important to understand is because the whole business model of software has to change. It has to change.

• 9:03Alex Rampell?

  This is what I call, as homage to Starbucks here, the tall, grandi venti model of SaaS. If you go to any SaaS company in the world, you go to their landing page, it probably looks like this. This is a company called Zendesk. It's now a private company. It was taken private by Premier and Hellman Friedman a few years ago. And this is a $2 billion ARR company that sells seats. So their most popular, like the venti package is you get the suite professional $115 a month. But we've talked about in the last couple of days how now AI does a really good job answering customer support queries. So how many seats do you need if every one of your agents is 9,000 times more productive? Imagine that you have 1,000 seats. Imagine that I've got 1,000 people working in my customer support call center.

• 9:47Alex Rampell?

  I pay each one fully loaded $75,000 a year. So that's $75 million a year in cost for people. Well, what's my software cost? Well, it's 1,000 times 115 times 12. It's about $1.4 million a year for the software. So the people cost is so much higher than the software cost. And this could go one of two directions for a company like Zendesk. If it turns out that AI can answer all the questions, how many seats do you need? Zero. You don't need a single seat left. The AI answers everything and then Zendesk is charging per seat. So they would go from 1.4 million to $0 in revenue. That would be very bad. On the other hand, I mean, look at the math here. If each human is answering 2,000 questions a year, right now, your fully loaded cost

• 10:29Alex Rampell?

  as the company that uses Zendesk as your system of record for answering customer support, it's about $37 of human cost and 69 cents of software cost. The cost per answer is $38. This is rough company example. Maybe Zendesk could charge $5 million here. Like, hey, Don't spend $75 million a year on support anymore. Spend $5 million a year on support, just pay it all to us. Don't pay us 1.4 million, pay us 5 million, save 75. So Zendesk is really at the precipice of it's like the revenue could go to zero or their revenue could 3X. And like, where is it gonna go? I don't know the answer. They don't know the answer. I've been talking to their CEO. They're piloting outcome-based pricing in New Zealand right now. So New Zealand holds the answer to all of our questions. So stay tuned.

• 11:14Alex Rampell?

  And just to give again, another example of just how much bigger these labor or quasi-labor markets are, like the $13 trillion of wages that we talked about. You know, software revenue is very small. If you just take one category, like just one particular profession and take the example of nurses, just because we have a portfolio company in this space. Nurses in the United States of America earn about $650 billion a year. There are about four and a half million registered nurses. That's bigger than the entire worldwide software market. And it doesn't mean that the nursing software market will be this big, but it means like this is the pool that you're really playing against. And the reason why I wanted to start with the filing cabinets is like, this is going to start moving to outcomes. Like the software is going to go from being the filing cabinet to effectively operating on the filing cabinet.

• 11:59Alex Rampell?

  And what does that mean? Well, you know, take the first example. If I have the filing cabinet for travel, you know, maybe the software can rebook flights or I want to book a trip for 75 kids at my son's high school and need to talk to an agent. I don't need to talk to an agent anymore. I just talk to the software company. I talk directly to United Airlines, you know, AI, and they do the entire thing for me. Sales, I mean, this is kind of obvious. You know, Salesforce charges per seat per month. Salesforce should just sell for me. I don't want to pay for a thousand seats. I want to pay for customers like, hey, go get me customers because you're the backend for that anyway. Or survey all of my customers, do a 30-minute phone call with every single one of them. See how they're doing. Are they happy? Are they going to renew with me? Yes or no? You know, what about manufacturing?

• 12:42Alex Rampell?

  Well, imagine that I make widgets and there are these things called tariffs that are happening. I'd love to figure out what my tariff exposure is. Let me just ask my ERP system, research that for me. Or I want you to do an audit or call my suppliers and see if they're going to still be able to. Ship me their things on time. Library card catalogs, as crazy as this one is, you know, what if my book is overdue? The librarian shouldn't be calling me. The library card software company should be calling me saying, hey, buddy, return the book. Or order more books because this one's very popular. You know, Ben's book is selling out. Order more copies of that. Legal case files, like a lot of software companies that are popping up in this space, it's no longer the system of record for like time and attendance. Like draft me a contract. Like do that work for me?

• 13:24Alex Rampell?

  You could start billing out, again, unclear how the pricing model of this is going to work, but start billing for that. Accounting and bookkeeping, you know, AR aging summary. Like this concept has been around for a long time. I have a lot of companies that owe me money, a lot of clients that owe me money. In 1940, I'd look at the printout and say, I'm gonna call these customers and hopefully collect for them, or send the guy with the crowbar, or do something. In 2000, I'd look at the QuickBooks thing and do the same thing. Now, the software company can go call, like QuickBooks is gonna start calling customers of their clients and say, hey, you owe me money, please pay me back, and I can accept a payment on the phone right now. Health records, so if you saw me limp offstage, I sadly had Achilles repair surgery about three months ago. I don't recommend it.

• 14:09Alex Rampell?

  The day after my surgery, I got a call from Stanford Hospital saying, you know, Alex, on a scale of one to 10, what's your pain level? And I said 11. And they said, very funny. And I said, no, it really is 11. And an AI nurse can't do CPR, right? An AI nurse can't attend to a gunshot wound victim. But an AI nurse can totally call a mid-40s patient like me and say, how are you doing? Is there anything we can help with? You know, do you have a fever? Oh, you do, you should go to the hospital right now, and stuff like that. And again, these are the outcomes, these are the operations that can be performed on, if you have my medical record, that's what you do with it. And charge for that. Charge $20 for that outbound call. HR and payroll, how do I do a reference check? How do I make sure that you, on your resume, you said you worked at these three companies? You know what?

• 14:54Alex Rampell?

  Workday should call those three companies and say, did Alex really work there? Explain benefits, help with enrollment. Workday could probably triple their revenue if they start doing this because they're already the system of record. So if you know the story of Airbnb, Airbnb famously started by somewhat scraping Craigslist. Craigslist is this horrible site from the mid 90s that has not changed since the mid 90s. And they have lots of listings for apartments. And you go look at an apartment and like half the time it's a scam, half the time it's already been booked, or you know, it's been relisted every single day. And they basically put them in a better interface and called it Airbnb. And that's how they got started. And this is one of the most exciting things that we're seeing, which is here's a real ad on Craigslist. Because since I have so much copious time due to my said Achilles injury, I used to

• 15:39Alex Rampell?

  run every day a bike every day, can't do that anymore. So I hang out on Craigslist looking for jobs, not for myself, of course. And here's a job for Plaza Lane Optometry. They're hiring a front desk receptionist. And they've had this job opening for six months. It's been hanging out there for six months. The job, like you have to now say in California, how much you're going to pay. It's $45,000 a year. So supply and demand, if they probably said we're going to pay $100,000 a year, they would have filled this job. They're paying, they need to pay $45,000 a year to make this work within their cost model or something. If you look at the job responsibilities, if you can read this, like the first one is like open and close the shop, lock the door. AI can't do that. But a lot of the other job responsibilities AI can completely do.

• 16:21Alex Rampell?

  It's, you know, argue with insurance company, call patient the day before their appointment to prevent no-shows. If somebody doesn't show up, that's a big, that's a big opportunity cost for the optometrist. And if you were to look at the optometry market and say, is that a good software market? You would say categorically no. Because Plaza Lane Optometry probably spends $500 a year on software. They probably have a Microsoft Office license. They probably have a website with Squarespace or Wix, and that's it. So they probably spend $500 a year. So in this new world, and again, we're seeing a lot of companies doing this, they peruse Craigslist, they look for a job listing, and they're like, hey. In optometry, I want to apply for the job. And you know, the optometrist is like, okay, that sounds great. Tell me about your qualifications. Where did you work before?

• 17:03Alex Rampell?

  It's like, I know this sounds crazy, but I'm a software company and I can't, I can't close the doors and do this, but I can do these other eight things. Can I give you a demo? And at first the optometrist is like, no, I want to, oh, okay, I'll try it out. And by the way, it's $20,000 a year, which is much less than the $45,000 a year that you were going to pay for a human that you can't even hire. So this is happening right now and it's incredible. And again, like the software spend, small for these people, the effective labor spend much, much higher. And, and this is what's massively growing the market for a lot of these obscure industries. So I just thought, rather than me talk, I want to give you an example. This is one of our portfolio companies, Happy Robot, which serves the, the freight and, and trucking space.

• 17:46Alex Rampell?

  So, so listen, this is a negotiation on the phone conducted with a prospective client and AI.

• 17:53Speaker 02

  Illinois.

• 17:54Speaker 03

  All right. So this is Joliet, Illinois to today between 6:00 AM and 2:00 PM delivers Monday between 6:00 AM and 4:00 PM. I have 700 on this one. Would you like to book this load?

• 18:04Speaker 02

  Gee, um, I'm going to need 800 for this one.

• 18:08Speaker 03

  I can check on that.

• 18:11Speaker 03

  So, um, we can't do eight at this point. Any chance you could come a bit closer to the load board rate?

• 18:15Speaker 02

  I could, I could do with 775. That's really my lowest.

• 18:21Speaker 03

  I understand. So, um, no chance you could do any better than 775?

• 18:26Speaker 02

  Um, how about 760?

• 18:29Speaker 03

  Let me see.

• 18:33Speaker 03

  Okay, I was able to get you 735 here.

• 18:36Speaker 02

  735, okay.

• 18:40Alex Rampell?

  So that, that's a closed transaction. Who, who's the robot and who's the human? This is like the new Turing test. I'll let you guys quiz me afterwards on that with, with your own theories. Here's another example. This is a company called Salient that does collections. So if you have, if you're a lender, if you're an auto lender, um, you know, you have to collect loan, you have to collect repayments on your loans and Salient serves a lot of auto lenders in this country. And here's, here's another call from that.

• 19:05Speaker 04

  Currently, your account is 51 days past due for $825.35. Would you be able to make a payment today?

• 19:13Speaker 05

  ¿Podría hablar en español? Como mencioné, su cuenta está 51 días vencida con un monto atrasado de $825.35. ¿Le gustaría realizar un pago hoy para ponerse al día con su cuenta?

• 19:26Alex Rampell?

  So the cool thing there is that Salient speaks dozens of languages. So it speaks Tagalog, it speaks Vietnamese, Mandarin. And again, like, this is a really important point. It's not just about cost. Cost, like, this is where people are getting this wrong. It's not like, oh, AI is going to take all the jobs because humans are too expensive and AI is cheaper. AI does a bunch of things, like intermittent demand is a big one. Imagine that I'm Black Friday retail. I'm a retailer and people know that, you know, sales are much higher around Black Friday. So I would have to hire tons of cashiers or if I'm an online retailer, hire lots of customer support people to go answer queries and whatnot. And then what do I do on January 1st?

• 20:09Alex Rampell?

  Do I fire them all and then rehire them in November? But actually, I should probably hire them in September because I have to train them. Kind of tricky. And there are a lot of other industries that have intermittent demand issues. I mean, United Airlines, if they have bad weather over Chicago, which of course never happens, they can't just hire and train 10,000 people overnight. But again, AI very, very good at that. The other example is there are a lot of demoralizing jobs out there. What is a demoralizing job? Well, collections is kind of a demoralizing job because you go call people and say, hey, you're overdue. About half the time, and I've listened to some of these calls, there are lots of expletives on the other side, right? So it's like, hey, you owe me money. It's like, F you, never call me again. It's like, ah, call back again. Hey, you owe me money, F you, never call me again. A human would get kind of tired of that.

• 20:53Alex Rampell?

  It's not a fun job. AI doesn't get bothered. So again, demoralizing jobs, very, very good. Regulatory certainly. So go back to this. I co-funded a company called The Firm. We got trained every quarter on UDAP, unfair deceptive and abusive practices. So there are lots of laws that mandate what you can and can't say to a customer. So imagine that you're calling a customer, say, hey, you owe me money. The customer says, F you. And then you have somebody on the other end who's had kind of a bad day and you can't blame them. It's like, F you back, customer. They're gonna get in trouble for that, right? And you have more certainty when you can program effectively a robot to conduct the entire call end to end, much more so than people.

• 21:35Alex Rampell?

  And my favorite example here is somebody who studied, you know, too many, I speak Russian, Japanese, and a smattering of Spanish, and spent way too much time learning that stuff. Language, languages, languages. I mean, it's just fact that a nurse, an AI nurse, like, what if I only spoke Farsi? Does Stanford have any Farsi-speaking nurses that can call me about my pain level? What if I only spoke Mongolian? Like, now they do. An AI nurse, an AI collections agent, an AI negotiator, like, all of these things can be done in dozens of different languages instantly, and you just wouldn't hire a human for that. Can't get somebody in Iowa that speaks Serbian, on-demand, interminably, with a demoralizing job, and so on and so forth. You know, AI does great. And it's also very important that AI expands the market, and this is why I wanted to start

• 22:20Alex Rampell?

  with the story of filing cabinets, because there was no software company for compliance. Because, this is actually a fact from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the fastest-growing job in America is manicurist-pedicurist. AI can't do that. The second fastest is compliance officer. So, compliance officer, you don't need software for compliance officers. If you're a city, you need more people. And no company has popped up effectively doing software, because it's like, the software market's kind of small, the people market's very large. Now you can roll into city and say, hey, I will do compliance for you end to end as a software solution, pay me $10 million a year, and I'm your software product that kind of tracks everything.

• 23:03Alex Rampell?

  Because before, they would just get more Microsoft Office licenses, or collections. Like, there is no software company for collections. There are collections people at collections firms. Now you can actually enter, potentially with the wedge of voice, and this is gonna get commoditized quickly, and we realize this, but you can backfill into a software company with real software revenue, real software margins, real software retention. The other thing that you're gonna start seeing us do is, there are a lot of non-AI companies that now work because of AI. So, because of my said- Very sad injury. I'm a big cyclist, as I've mentioned. My garage looks like this with a lot of bikes that aren't being used. I hope to use them again in the future. Why isn't there an Airbnb for bicycles? Why hasn't somebody built them?

• 23:47Alex Rampell?

  Well, I'll tell you why. It's a very bad idea. That's why nobody's done it. And why is it a bad idea? Because the central tenant, AI, not AI, it could be in 2000 B.C. It doesn't really matter. If your customer acquisition cost plus your cost of goods sold is greater than your lifetime value, do not proceed. That's not a business. But now with AI, imagine that I wanted to start Airbnb for bicycles. Well, how am I going to go get the people that have spare bicycles in their garage? Am I going to hire a bunch of expensive Stanford kids in Palo Alto and have to give them 20 different flavors of coconut water and cater to their millennial needs in order for them to work in the sales operation in Palo Alto? No, I'm going to have an AI sales rep call everybody. And the cost per AI sales rep per year is a few hundred bucks, not $100,000.

• 24:32Alex Rampell?

  No coconut water necessary. Well, what if there's an emergency? Well, now there's a 1-800 number that you call. That's an AI rep that can do everything, call the police, call whatever. And lastly, how do I screen this person, do a background check? Is the bicycle good? Is it stolen? Like, whatever you would need to do this silly business that we're not going to fund, AI can do this as well. So you actually have a whole category of business, which was like, it would have worked except for this pesky customer acquisition cost or pesky cost of goods sold. And of course, AI, you can vibe code your way into one of these businesses anyway. So massively expands the size of the market. The non-AI market, given the AI infrastructure just allowing CAC to come down, COGS to come down, for now. I mean, every company is going to start using these tools.

• 25:17Alex Rampell?

  So it will become a version of the Yogi Bear quote, "It's so crowded, nobody goes here anymore." But now, a lot of companies prosecuting sometimes older, new ideas that just wouldn't have worked five years ago. And this is a global opportunity, right? I mean, like, the US labor market, big. It's $13 trillion a year. The worldwide labor market, so much bigger. And our job, on behalf of your capital here, our labor on behalf of your capital is to find the best companies that will make software look small. So, thank you very much.

• 25:48Erik Torenberg?

  Thanks for listening to this episode of the A16Z Podcast. If you liked this episode, be sure to like, comment, subscribe, leave us a rating or review, and share it with your friends and family. For more episodes, go to YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Follow us on X at A16Z and subscribe to our Substack at A16Z.substack.com. Thanks again for listening, and I'll see you in the next episode. As a reminder, the content here is for informational purposes only, should not be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice, or be used to evaluate any investment or security, and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any A16Z fund. Please note that A16Z and its affiliates may also maintain investments in the companies discussed in this podcast.

• 26:32Erik Torenberg?

  For more details, including a link to our investments, please see A16Z.com/disclosures.