Unpacking Germany’s Historic U-Turn on Spending — ft. Carsten Brzeski

Scott and Ed open the show by discussing Apple’s $1 billion annual loss on AppleTV+, Silver Lake’s move to take Endeavor private, and Nike’s latest earnings report. Then Carsten Brzeski, Global Head of Macro Research and Chief Eurozone Economist for ING, joins the show to break down Germany’s political and economic landscape. He unpacks the growing fragmentation among political parties and explains the country’s longstanding reluctance to take on debt. Carsten also breaks down the recent surge in capital allocations to the Eurozone and weighs in on whether this could mark the beginning of a sustained multi-year rally. Subscribe to the Prof G Markets newsletter Order "The Algebra of Wealth," out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod: Instagram Threads X Reddit Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Welch's Fruit Snacks. Back to school season can be tough on parents. But choosing a snack you and your kids can both get behind doesn't have to be. Stock up on Welch's Fruit Snacks. Made with whole fruit and now made with no artificial dyes. It's a snack kids already love and one you can feel good about giving them. Go back to school with Welch's Fruit Snacks. Now made with no artificial dyes.

• 0:28Speaker 01

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline. That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in. Dashboard confessions.

• 0:37Speaker 02

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had. Impressions.

• 0:45Speaker 01

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 0:58Speaker 03

  Payday bars have a bone to pick with the other candy bars. Enough with the toppings and layers and stuff, kay? Payday bars are just salty crunchy peanuts and sweet caramel. Delicious. Payday Peanut Caramel Bar.

• 1:13Scott Galloway?

  Today's number 116. That's the percentage increase in egg interceptions by customs at the US Mexico border in the first two months of this year. True story. I was at a farm and I hurt my ass. I didn't know whether to see the proctologist or a vet.

• 1:40Scott Galloway?

  Get it? Because I was having sex with an animal.

• 1:42Ed Elson?

  I didn't put the B C L C in there.

• 1:43Scott Galloway?

  I should have gone simpler. I have a dildo farm. Unfortunately, it was taken over by squatters.

• 1:50Scott Galloway?

  Jesus Christ, you're literally low IQ with my porn jokes.

• 1:53Ed Elson?

  Well, Claire's laughing, so yeah, clearly I don't get it.

• 1:56Scott Galloway?

  That's because her prefrontal cortex, which is executive function and management ability and ability to interpret profanity are 18 months ahead of yours. It'll catch up soon, though.

• 2:08Ed Elson?

  I still can't put it together. Take me through it for the low IQ brain.

• 2:12Scott Galloway?

  No, no, no, no, no, no, no. No one needs to hear a guy my age explaining squatting and dildos.

• 2:19Ed Elson?

  Oh, got it.

• 2:21Scott Galloway?

  Oh, you got it. There you go, little soldier. He'll get there.

• 2:26Ed Elson?

  Very slow this morning, clearly. How are you doing?

• 2:29Scott Galloway?

  I'm doing well. I'm excited about, I'm taking my son on his college tour on Saturday. I'm excited about that. What I call the places he won't get in.

• 2:36Ed Elson?

  Where are you going? Can you, can you share?

• 2:38Scott Galloway?

  We're going to Wisconsin. We're going to Illinois. We're going to Michigan. We're going to Virginia. We're going to Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina.

• 2:49Ed Elson?

  Wow.

• 2:49Scott Galloway?

  There's very few things he listens to me about, and one of them is college. And I've said, just you gotta trust me on this. You want the kind of, in my view, the big college, fall leaves, football games, fraternity sororities experience. I just think it's incredibly singular and unique.

• 3:08Ed Elson?

  Does he agree?

• 3:09Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, he's, he's kind of a mini me, angry depressed.

• 3:15Scott Galloway?

  He's, no, he's, he really is sort of, we're, we're very similar. And so, and I, I feel as if I know him and he's, he's pretty social and, and, and smart and all that good stuff. So I think he's, I think he would benefit from kind of a big land grant. Am I just trying to live, am I like, have I become like Serena Williams' dad? Am I just living my life with my son right now? No, you are going to Michigan because I couldn't, because I couldn't.

• 3:45Ed Elson?

  Exactly. You're going to join a frat.

• 3:50Scott Galloway?

  That's right.

• 3:50Ed Elson?

  One thing I will say is that when I did the, the whole college tour with my mom, you don't really learn that much is what I found about the schools because you're just being inundated with all of this information. And they all look great, but it was a great bonding experience to do that with my mom. I think that was my biggest takeaway. It's just, just a nice time.

• 4:11Scott Galloway?

  That's nice. That's what I'm looking for.

• 4:12Ed Elson?

  Shall we bust into the headlines here?

• 4:14Scott Galloway?

  We should. Thank you for that, Ed. Well done.

• 4:16Ed Elson?

  You're welcome.

• 4:19Speaker 06

  Now is the time to cry. I hope you have plenty of the world at all.

• 4:26Ed Elson?

  Apple is reportedly losing $1 billion annually on streaming. Apple TV Plus is the company's only unprofitable subscription in its very fast growing services unit. Silver Lake is taking Endeavor private in a $25 billion deal. The newly formed entity will be called WME Group with former Endeavour CEO Ari Emanuel serving as the executive chairman. Emanuel secured a nearly $174 million payout as part of the deal. And finally, Nike stock tumbled to a five year low after the company projected a larger than anticipated revenue decline for the current quarter. Nike attributed the lower guidance to ongoing challenges, including tariffs and declining consumer confidence.

• 5:10Ed Elson?

  Scott, let's start with your thoughts. Apple TV Plus is reportedly losing $1 billion annually on streaming.

• 5:20Scott Galloway?

  What's interesting is to think if they could do it all over, would they still be in this business? And they got into the content business when everyone, I feel as if Apple decides, okay, we need a call option. We needed a call option on the headsets. When Meta was getting into them, we need a call option in content. And I think that when you look at decisions, you have to look at it the way the military looks at it. And that is when they're reviewing an officer's decisions on the battlefield, they don't look at the outcomes. They look at, given what he or she knew at that moment, was it the right decision? And I think that figuring out quality content that maybe motivates

• 6:00Scott Galloway?

  people to continue to buy an iPhone over a Galaxy, you could see how they would justify it. And also, they have the capital to kind of go mostly toe to toe. And even they can't go toe to toe. I think they spend four or five billion dollars a year on content and Netflix is at 18. But at this point, I can't imagine their business plan said that whatever it was. When did they launch it?

• 6:23Ed Elson?

  2019.

• 6:24Scott Galloway?

  I imagine the business plan didn't say in six years, we'll still be losing a billion dollars. This is a different thing because Apple, a billion dollars is a lot of money for most people. It's not for Apple. It reported $94 billion in net income in its last fiscal year. And at average revenue of $800 per iPhone, Apple would need to sell one and a quarter million iPhones every year. So the question, the analysis they've done, I imagine, is does this probably inspire another one and a quarter million people a year of their installed base? They sell 232 million iPhones globally in 2023. So can we get another half a percent either upgrade and not switch to Android?

• 7:08Scott Galloway?

  Or get an incremental half a percent because of the Apple TV offering? Now, I don't think it's because you get, when I bought my iPhone, I think I got a free year of Apple TV plus. I don't know if that's even registers with people who are buying an iPhone. What I do think though, is that what they have done a really good job of is they kind of took an HBO plus approach to their content. And that is shows like Greyhound, Ted Lasso, and now Severance. And then The Morning Show are of such incredible production quality that it feels very Apple-esque. I think their content is very on brand.

• 7:50Scott Galloway?

  The question is, they went into a field that is too crowded. But for a billion dollars is the marketing halo of that amazing content? Almost like a marketing expense. What do you think?

• 8:01Ed Elson?

  Yeah, I think that's the main point here. It actually goes back to what we were talking about with Southwest and their bag policy and Costco with their hot dogs. The idea that this is intentionally a loss leader. They're losing a billion dollars a year. And perhaps that's worth it to them because they say, well, maybe this is going to get people to buy iPhones. We're going to offer three months of free Apple TV plus. If you buy an iPhone, or if you buy an iPad, or if you buy a Mac laptop. And I think that is the question is, how many people are actually buying Apple products? Because they want to get three months. Of free Apple TV plus, I would argue zero people are buying these devices for

• 8:43Ed Elson?

  that. And I would also add on to the fact, the fact that you have iPhone sales, which are flatlining at the moment. I mean, we have seen an increase in in laptop sales, but I really doubt that this one billion dollar year loss is paying off. And then you just look at the numbers of the platform itself, averaging around five billion dollars a year on content since they launched this in 2019, but they only have 45 million subscribers. And you compare that to say Max, for example, which has 117 million subscribers and Netflix, which has more than 300 million subscribers. So it's not a very good business. And I just

• 9:24Ed Elson?

  doubt that the upside that you're seeing in the sales of their other devices, I'm not sure that you could justify this as a worthy loss leader in the Apple business. And I think what we will probably start to see is Tim Cook getting under a little bit more pressure from shareholders about these issues. And I think we'll start to see that that content budget will shrink and shrink and shrink. Let's move on to Endeavor and this acquisition by private equity firm Silver Lake. Just a reminder, what is Endeavor? A lot of people know this company as WME, which is of course the talent agency that was founded by Ari Emanuel. You might know who that is. He was the guy who inspired the TV show Entourage.

• 10:08Ed Elson?

  He's sort of the star talent agent in Hollywood and WME. They represent all of the biggest movie stars, all of the biggest pop stars. They also, by the way, represent Scott Galloway. But they also have these other businesses too. So, for example, they own a controlling stake in the WWE, the Worldwide Wrestling Entertainment Company. They also have a controlling stake in the UFC. So now Silver Lake is taking it private. It's been a public company since 2021. They're going to rename it the WME Group. And I think this is to reflect this new focus back onto talent and talent representation. They're paying a 55% premium. So $25 billion,

• 10:48Ed Elson?

  that is 55% higher than its market cap before the bid. And it's also the largest take private deal in entertainment history. So Scott, your reactions to this deal? And maybe, do you have any inside baseball, given the fact that you work? Semi closely with WME.

• 11:04Scott Galloway?

  I don't on this side of it. I really like the folks at WME. I don't know Ari. I don't think I've ever met him. And Patrick Whitesell, I have met a couple of times. He's got a central casting for what an agent should be. He's this tall, handsome guy who's very good at making you feel important. Every time I've seen him, he comes up and he says, you know, a big fan and super nice, super likable, like total kind of baller impressive guy. Ari is an icon in the industry, very smart. And just so I can get fired by my agency, my general sense is this is financial engineering. So to the top two or three guys can rape the company and its shareholders. They're part of the virus that infects

• 11:47Scott Galloway?

  American management where they see the company as a vehicle for them to vastly overpay themselves and to underpay people at the low end. The stock basically has underperformed the market. My guess is when it went public, he got, he and Patrick got an enormous payday. And meanwhile, entry level assistant pay at WME was raised from $15 to $18 an hour in 2020. Well, that was big of them. Roughly $37,000 a year and has not increased since. So I think this is a conspiracy between Silver Lake and the senior management to basically fuck shareholders. And take advantage of a marketplace where a lot of people want to be in the great big business of Hollywood.

• 12:29Scott Galloway?

  And I think it's insane that a company like this would pay anyone in the organization 15 or 18 bucks an hour. So does this make sense? I don't know. I don't, what's the rationale? Why did this make sense to go public just a few years ago? And then why does it make sense to go private now? If not just to make the people in charge and some of the board members really fucking rich?

• 12:55Ed Elson?

  I think you are probably on the money here. I mean, he's, he's getting 174 million in cash for the shares that he owns in this transaction. But I think probably the more important statistic here is that last year for his compensation package, he got paid $84 million. And that's just.

• 13:16Ed Elson?

  So stock in comparison to, as you say, the extremely low pay for the entry level workers in this business. I mean, I know people who work at these companies and the life as a staffer and assistant at one of these big talent agencies is not very good. It's one of those glamorous industries where I think they get to take advantage of the fact that people really want to work in Hollywood, but these people do not get paid very well. And then you have the fact that the company, after going public, has done very badly from a shareholder perspective. I mean, Silver Lake would say that the common stockholders here did very well here. They got $27.50 per share, which is a 55% premium

• 13:59Ed Elson?

  to the share price that was unaffected by the bid. That's pretty good. But what you have to remember, though, is the IPO price, the issuance price. This company went public at $24 a share. So even if you were the very first investor, if you invested directly in the IPO, you have made a lousy return. It's around 14% in the last four years. The S and P in the same amount of time is up 40%. And so, yeah, this is a bad investment. And for a long time, it was even worse. I mean, at one point, the stock was down at $17. So I think you're probably on to something here. But I think the more interesting thing will be seeing what your agents over at WME will say after this episode releases.

• 14:44Scott Galloway?

  I love what Sam Harris said, and that is, if you have economic security and people who love you, you have an obligation to speak the truth. And I love the people at WME. By the way, I don't even think it's just the junior people getting fucked here. I mean, the thing about tech, for all the shit we give tech, when they do really well, they generally share those spoils. So I would love to know, and I think a reasonable question is, if an assistant has been there, any employee has been there longer than a year, are they making any money? Are they getting anything from this? And what I think, I'm not sure, but what I would imagine is that even, even mid-level and even senior agents there, they're not really participating in this payday. There needs to be a different zeitgeist in corporate America where if you're blessed like these guys are, you share the wealth specifically with the lowest people. And let

• 15:29Scott Galloway?

  me, let me, I never want to pass up a chance to virtue signal, but we've been talking at Prof G Media, you know, we're small, we're 18 people, but we make a really good living. And we do really well. We're blessed. We're very good at what we do, but we're sort of in the right place, the right time, media podcasting. We're drafting off of the monstrous talent of a, of an aging professor. But the result is, we have an exceptionally high margin profitable little business. And so we've been talking about, and I think we're going to do this, going to what we call a maximum wage business. And that is, we're going to have minimum wage of $50 an hour for everybody who works with us on a contract

• 16:10Scott Galloway?

  basis or part timers paid hourly. And we're going to have a minimum annual compensation, including bonus of a hundred grand a year. And why are we going to do this? Because we can. And we make really good money. And I make a shit ton of money. And if I make a shit ton of money minus a half a million dollars a year, that's okay.

• 16:30Ed Elson?

  But what's going to happen to the second Ferrari? Are you going to, you going to compromise?

• 16:34Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, the thing about it getting for me getting a Ferrari isn't my dick is too big. But anyways, if you're a company like WME, or on a much, much smaller scale, Prof G Media, like Ari, you don't need a second billion. It's not going to make any fucking happier, boss. You know, it's going to make you happier is helping people move out of their car if they make a bad decision. You know, my question to the senior manager at WME is, given your blessings and your strength and your skills, are you protecting and providing for your professional family? I mean, are you really protecting them? Are you really providing for them? And the senior level people will be fine. But it's the people at the lower end, or the people in the engine room, you probably don't have a lot of contact

• 17:18Scott Galloway?

  with, you know, are you really acting like a man? Is that what it means to be a man to extract enormous economic benefit without protecting and providing for the people who are not as fortunate or don't have face time with you? Anyways, I'm all riled up about this. And if anyone wants to turn this into original series, call my agent at CAA.

• 17:42Ed Elson?

  I just want to point out.

• 17:43Scott Galloway?

  Love you guys. Love my, but my agents are nice. If my agents were in charge, they wouldn't put up with this shit.

• 17:48Ed Elson?

  I just want to make it very clear. I'm not calling for an attack on Ari Emanuel. I've heard that this guy's an absolute bruiser, attack dog. He can take anyone down. So I just want to make it publicly clear on the podcast. I have no beef with Ari Emanuel. It's only Scott who wants to, who wants to pick a fight.

• 18:06Scott Galloway?

  Yeah. Something about billionaires that don't pay their people kind of chafes me. But anyways, I don't know the guy. I don't know the guy. He's obviously very successful, brilliant agent, but what's the point? What's the point of all the success? Anyways, uh, thank you for my virtue signaling moment.

• 18:21Ed Elson?

  Let's talk about Nike, which has hit a five-year low as of its last earnings call. The market cap is now below $100 billion. Just to put that in context, that means that Nike is now almost three times less valuable than Hermes. And I use that example because just a few years ago, the opposite was true. Nike was almost three times more valuable. So this is a stunning drop. Much of it a result of these tariffs. Uh, also the business at large. Scott, your reactions to Nike, their earnings and the fact that the stock has plummeted five-year low.

• 18:54Scott Galloway?

  This is an amazing brand, amazing human capital. Imagine they have incredible retailer relationships around the world. It's a global brand. It's still arguably, I would imagine, one of the 20 best brands. I don't know. This feels like an activist to me because it feels like someone's going to show up with one to $3 billion in stock. And say, we're here, we're going to give Elliot, the new CEO, a chance to do his thing for a year, but if it doesn't work, we want to see pretty serious cost cutting. So, but I like the company. I would consider actually investing here.

• 19:27Ed Elson?

  Yeah. I mean, I think just to look at the earnings, I mean, the stock, it was a massive stock drop. It was around seven or eight percent in a day. It's interesting because the actual results from, from the, the previous quarter were not that bad. They beat on revenue. They beat on EPS. The big problem for Wall Street and for investors was the guidance. And this is important because you might remember. Back when they switched the CEO, they they brought in this new guy Elliot Hill. Nike decided and they publicly announced that they were going to pause their reporting on guidance. And that was sort of a big deal that we talked about on this podcast. So they didn't report the guidance number in the 10Q itself. But they did talk about it on the call.

• 20:11Ed Elson?

  And this is the part that really freaked out the market because they said that in the coming quarter. They expect that the year on year revenue, the sales number will decline in quote, the mid teens range. So they're looking at a 14, 15, 16% drop on the top line. And that's both already very bad and way, way more dramatic than expected. And I think the question that people are asking, well, why is this happening? And the answer is what you'd expect. This is because of the tariffs. Because out of the hundreds of suppliers and manufacturers that Nike works with, guess what? A quarter of them are in China. So they have these two choices now.

• 20:55Ed Elson?

  You can either take the hit on the margin, which is going to upset people, specifically investors. Or you can raise your prices, which is going to upset consumers who are already not very happy with the product assortment at the moment. And they didn't say which strategy they're going to go with. I think we could maybe expect both. Maybe they'll raise prices slightly and also take a slight hit on the margin. I think what we can definitely expect though, because they told us, is a significant decline in revenue.

• 21:25Scott Galloway?

  So there's, there's a few things that are optimistic and pessimistic. The first is just on a brand level, when you get to the level of ubiquity of Nike and you're basing it on high margin, which is Latin for being more attractive to mates or self expressive benefit or making people feel closer to God. It's very hard to maintain that margin and brand power because the moment your mom shows up with Nikes, you're no longer interested in wearing Nikes is the 19 year old kid. And basically, most of fashion is dictated by a young aspirational male or female. And so generally speaking. These companies that are really brand driven, they have trouble getting above, say, five, seven, $10 billion. And Nike was able to do it, like fiscal year 2024 got to 50 billion.

• 22:10Scott Galloway?

  But at some point, when if everyone was wearing Van Cleef, you would find that other competitors would come in. People don't, people look at this as self expressive benefit. And once every kid in high school is wearing Nikes, kids go, I don't want Nike. I want to express my differentiation. And what Hermes has done is they say, okay, it's not about volume, it's about scarcity, the illusion of scarcity. I remember I was buying a Kelly bag for someone in my life. And they acted it as if it was an act of God to get me this fucking bag. And I'm like, okay, it's such manufactured scarcity. These are not difficult items to manufacture, but they're really smart because they know if these things become in any way, I don't even become, I won't even say they won't even become ubiquitous,

• 22:53Scott Galloway?

  but become even ever present or common. They're done. They can't charge, you know, $18,000 for a bag that probably costs $1,200 to produce. It is difficult for a company like Nike to maintain the growth expectations the street wants from them while maintaining that sense of aspiration and exclusivity. So that's, that's the bad news. The things they have for them are that Elliot has going for them. As one, he has cloud cover to do the very ugly and hard work of cutting costs like a madman right now. He can pretty much do whatever he wants. He's brand new. The board is going to give him at least two or three years to try and do his thing, probably longer. He has cloud cover to cut costs. He's probably going to have to reconfigure the approach to marketing because if you think about what's changed,

• 23:36Scott Galloway?

  their core competence was they were smart enough to get very tightly integrated. I think it was Whedon Kennedy. And you could smell a Nike commercial coming on. Like in the first second, you're like, oh, my God, this is a Nike commercial. Pay attention. And the primary weapon of branding, and that is great commercials and broadcast television, that weapon has become duller and duller and duller. And that is broadcast television is just no longer as effective because the most aspirational people who Nike wants wearing the shoes probably aren't watching a lot of commercials on broadcast television now. So they have had to kind of reinvent. Now, have they been as good around influencer marketing, around supply chain? I don't know. But it's got to be heartbreaking for a lot of the people at Nike who have worked really

• 24:18Scott Galloway?

  hard, really good, very talented people, and they've made no money in terms of their equity value over the last 10 years. Right? If you started there 10 years ago, you haven't made it, you know, unless maybe it's RSU is not options. But I would, again, I see more risk to the upside. And that is, I would feel fairly confident betting that the stock doubles from here in the next two to three years versus getting cut in half because the brand value is just so powerful. Anyways, Nike, just do it.

• 24:48Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back after the break for our conversation with Carsten Brzezinski. If you're enjoying the show so far, be sure to give Profty Market a follow wherever you get your podcasts.

• 25:05Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Welch's Fruit Snacks. Back to school season can be tough on parents, but choosing a snack you and your kids can both get behind doesn't have to be. Stock up on Welch's Fruit Snacks, made with whole fruit and now made with no artificial dyes. It's a snack kids already love and one you can feel good about giving them. Go back to school with Welch's Fruit Snacks, now made with no artificial dyes.

• 25:33Speaker 01

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in. Dashboard Confessions.

• 25:43Speaker 02

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.

• 25:50Speaker 01

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 26:03Speaker 03

  Payday bars have a bone to pick with the other candy bars. Enough with the toppings and layers and stuff, kay? Payday bars are just salty crunchy peanuts and sweet caramel. Delicious! Payday Peanut Caramel Bar.

• 26:24Ed Elson?

  Welcome back. Here's our conversation with Carsten Brzezinski, Global Head of Macro Research and Chief Eurozone Economist for ING, as well as Chief Economist for ING Germany.

• 26:37Ed Elson?

  So Carsten, we're happy to have you on today to talk about Germany, which we've been discussing a lot recently. Last week, Scott and I discussed this new defence spending package. We've also talked about the German stock market, and we'll get to all of that. But first, I would just like to get a general picture of what's happening in Germany. And I think a good place to start would be politics. Germany held an election last month. The Conservative Party won, but not by much. Tell us what happened in the German election. Give us the state of play in Germany, the political situation, and what has happened since that election.

• 27:12Speaker 07

  It was a very, very important election. As you know, we had a collapsed government before. That was the first time we actually had a three-party coalition in Germany, first time ever. Didn't make it till the end. So with these new elections and snap elections end of February, it was more or less the idea that this would be the last election, the last chance for the established political parties to show that they can really get the economy out of the current slump before maybe extreme parties to both the right and left wing of the political landscape would gain even more votes. When you look at the results then, what did we get?

• 27:57Speaker 07

  Yes, we had a winner. That was the Christian Democratic Party, led by Friedrich Merz. But they hardly got 30% of the votes. I think the big surprise, no longer a surprise for Germans but for international observers, was the second place for the Alternative for Deutschland, far-right extreme party, coming in with more than 20% of the votes. And then we had the Social Democrats, the Greens, both in the former government party, they lost. The Liberals didn't even make it into parliament.

• 28:31Speaker 07

  And now we have, we have a new parliament, actually since this week, since twenty fifth of March, um, in, in which we do have, um, kind of the, um, the right wing, AFD probably being the largest opposition party. And, uh, and we have also the left wing extreme, the left party, former Communist Party also being in, uh, in parliament. So it is not as fragmented as other European parliaments are, but, um, but German politics has become more fragmented.

• 29:03Ed Elson?

  Yeah, we hear a lot about the AFD party here in America. Um, you know, obviously Elon has expressed support for this party. You know, the, it's the far right party in Germany. And then you, you mentioned the rise of the extreme far left party in Germany. Your thoughts on what this says about the situation in Germany right now?

• 29:22Speaker 07

  I think at the elections, there were three elements that, that were key. Uh, one, one is the economy, the, the Germany economy hadn't grown for five years in a row. Uh, we had the headlines that also big industrial companies in, in Germany had to lay off people. So it really, you know, I think also all voters understood that there is something structurally at hand in the Germany economy. So that clearly played a role. People were looking for answers. That is, that is one. Then we have the, uh, the, the migration story. Where, where also then over the winter period, we had, uh, we had more attacks by, well, migrants, former refugees, um, so really how to integrate migrants into society

• 30:06Speaker 07

  has also been a big topic for, for, at these elections and clearly explained why the, the AFD again gained so much support. And then the third point is more kind of general disappointment with established parties. Uh, this, this idea, we, we, the voters thinking, we had given them many chances to show that they are able to, to manage migration, that they are able to manage the economy in the eyes of many voters than established parties, uh, had not succeeded. So then why don't we give other parties a chance? So I think this is clearly the stepping away from, from more centrist party for, uh, parties, established parties, clearly another reason why we had the support for both. And that's interesting for both the AFD and the, uh, the left extreme party.

• 30:52Ed Elson?

  You mentioned there's five years of stagnation in Germany. And of course, last year it happened again. The German economy shrank. I think GDP fell around point two percent. Big picture, what has been going wrong in Germany? When you look at the economy, how it's performed compared to America in the past few years? What are the main issues that are causing that stagnation?

• 31:13Speaker 07

  I always call them cyclical and structural issues. Cyclical issues, pandemic, even more war in Ukraine, energy crisis. So that clearly pushed down on industry, but also on economic activity in general. And don't, don't, don't forget that Germany had been highly depending on Russian oil and gas before that. So the, the energy price crisis was a, was a big factor. Also geopolitical tensions for an economy that is so depending on exports. But that's not all. I think when I always love to look at these international competitiveness rankings. And there, Germany was in, in the top five 10 years ago.

• 31:58Speaker 07

  Now of the most competitive economies in the world. Now 10 years later, Germany is somewhere between number 20 or ranked 20 and 25. And what does this show? This shows underinvestment, underinvestment in infrastructure, in digitalization, in education. So Germany has more or less forgotten to really innovate, to invest in the future. And this is what now all these things came together. Another important factor, but also only showing is the changing role of China. Over the last couple of years, and I think electric vehicles is the best example, but there's more to it. Then that China has now is able to produce the stuff that normally imported from Germany.

• 32:44Speaker 07

  So China has moved from being a very, you know, great flourishing export market for the German industry to arrival. And, and then the German industry has not been able to, to face this competition.

• 32:58Scott Galloway?

  So as Germany goes, kind of so goes Europe, largest economy, about 4.6 or 4.7 trillion. I think the next biggest is the UK at about three and a half. If the US can't be counted on in terms of resources for Ukraine, then EU gets to make a decision around how supportive or not supportive they are of Ukraine. And that's largely, I think, going to be dictated, not entirely, but substantively by Germany's approach or view on how supportive or not supportive they want to be of Ukraine. Could you attempt to distill for us the general feeling about the war in Ukraine?

• 33:38Scott Galloway?

  And how how resolute or how firmly behind Ukraine Germany is or isn't, given the fact that Europe's now, I mean, I hate to say this, but more on their own than before in terms of support or lack thereof of Ukraine?

• 33:56Speaker 07

  The German people clearly stood behind Ukraine and stood behind support for Ukraine. But don't forget that Germany was a split country with different cultural backgrounds, also with different historical backgrounds vis a vis Russia. But this war in Ukraine is only a few hundred kilometers away from Germany. So this is pretty close by. And you had an interesting, well, combination of still of fear from Russia, fear that the whole thing could escalate. I think Germany was not alone in 2022, which I think also made that the German government

• 34:41Speaker 07

  back then was also maybe too cautious and giving big support for Ukraine because there was always this fear of any nuclear or tactical nuclear reaction by Russia. But the general feeling, Scott, is that really the Germans stand behind support for Ukraine. And if you now really look at what happened over the last couple of weeks, because I think that is even more important than what happened in 2022, 23 and 24, is that Germany and also the German people understood.

• 35:16Speaker 07

  That the role of the US has completely changed. And this is, well, me not being the economist, but just an ordinary person. I'm born in West Berlin. I'm actually born in the US, in the US sector. And I grew up always with this, with this strong belief in the US would support us if push came to shove. And that is not only me personally, but I think that is something that an entire generation has or has had. And now the problem is, I think many in Germany understand, but we can no longer count on this

• 35:57Speaker 07

  US support, on the US being the, well, the last resort. So which now if you do the, and this is also why we had this big historic fiscal package. And it is not even the new government, because technically speaking, we don't have a new government. We have possibly an incoming government, but we don't have an officially a new government. So and that is the interesting thing. So we now had that the probably incoming government with a probably incoming next chancellor Friedrich Merz decided to go for a historic fiscal U-turn, not only on spending more for infrastructure, but to really go for a whatever it takes on, on defence.

• 36:41Speaker 07

  And I think this is, I think where you're heading to, I think Germany has now understood. And I think most of, most of Europe has understood that Europe needs to step up its game.

• 36:51Ed Elson?

  Yeah, just on the, the spending package, Kostan. You know, it sounds like this is a turning point to, in terms of Germany's approach to spending in general, both spending on defence and then also spending on infrastructure, which compared to its peers has historically been very low. But then there's also the debt side where Germany has had this.

• 37:15Ed Elson?

  Basically allergic reaction towards debt and towards borrowing for as, I mean certainly the past many decades, you know, lowest debt to GDP in the G7, one of the lowest borrowing rates. Two questions. One, why do you think Germany has had this approach to borrowing in the past? And two, do you think this is a turning point in terms of debt too? Do you think that we're about to see a country that embraces more fiscal liberalism, I guess I would say, and embraces debt in the same way that perhaps America does?

• 37:49Speaker 07

  Short linguistic journey for you guys. In German, debt means the same as guilt. And I think that is not the only language, but that is an important one. So somehow debt, like government debt, always had a negative connotation. Let's explain something. Because the funny thing, when you really go back, I think until the late 1960s, Germany had also been in a kind of, well, this was mainly a fiscal policy framework which allowed deficits only for investments, what called this one of the first golden rules on fiscal policies.

• 38:31Speaker 07

  Then with the oil crisis and inflation in the 70s, all things changed and we saw this surge in government debt across the entire G7. Then came the financial crisis, well, do fast forward, financial crisis 2008, 2009, Germany also had to bail out some smaller banks, but with lots of taxpayers' money. And this was the moment when the government back then said, hey, we need to make sure that politicians will not be irresponsibly spending taxpayers' money. So let's go for this constitutional fiscal debt break.

• 39:14Speaker 07

  Back then, it made sense, tie politicians' hands. Then we had the Euro crisis. And in the Euro crisis, 2010, 2012, while this entire debt break came in handy, why? Because Germany could lead by example. So Germany was clearly the fiscally frugal country which could tell the Southern European economies to also do austerity. All good. Then I think then this is then when when the mistakes started to come come in. Because in the two thousand teens, after the Euro crisis, Germany was still going on with this fiscal debt break. And the fiscal debt break became a political issue. Because the political issue was this is something, one of the very few economic promises

• 39:56Speaker 07

  all governments led by Angela Merkel were able to to fulfill. And this was very, it was very interesting or very easy to understand for voters. This was like a normal person cannot spend more money than it earns. So therefore, why should the government spend more money than it earns? What did not get so much attention in in the last decade was the fact that, yes, Germany ran fiscal ballot of a balanced budget, sometimes surpluses. But it was always because Germany was applying austerity on investments. The government continued to consume and to spend, give out nice electoral gifts,

• 40:40Speaker 07

  but they they forgot to invest. And and now, where we were right now, I think we have other their research institutions saying that we have an investment gap in Germany of some six hundred billion euro. And this is explaining also this loss in international competitiveness. It's an investment gap mainly in infrastructure, but then infrastructure, conventional and digital infrastructure. And now the interesting thing is, it clearly is a political issue. And it also was one of the big topics during the election campaign. Do you want to change the fiscal debt break? Or don't you want to change the fiscal debt break? Very easy.

• 41:21Speaker 07

  And and now, and that was also the interesting thing, because the the CDU, Christian Democrats, Freiherr Schmerz, they always said during the election campaign, no, we're not going to change anything. We're going to stick to this to the debt break. Well, he made this U-turn, this very important U-turn. And what we're having right now, I think that's also important also for your for your listeners and viewers here. So what what is it that we got in this historic decision? We now have a fiscal package of five hundred billion euro.

• 41:55Speaker 07

  To be spent on infrastructure. There are some details of these 500 billion euro, 100 billion euro go into a climate transition fund, 100 billion euro go to the to the regional state governments, but also to be used for infrastructure investments and then 300 billion euro remain at the federal government for infrastructure investment. So that is that is one big package. Also means to be spent over the next 10 to 12 years would would make up like 1% of GDP every single year. Then we have the other thing, smaller detail, but not not completely unimportant. The regional states get more fiscal space.

• 42:38Speaker 07

  So a bit like what what you guys have in the US. Until now, the state governments had a balanced budget amendments, so they were not allowed to run any single deficit. So now they get a bit more fiscal space, also increasing spending power. And the third point then is clearly defence. And then with the defence story, also technical issue. So what the technicality says is all defence spending in excess of 1% of GDP will be exempted from the debt break. So simply meaning that Germany could run extreme high annual deficits.

• 43:19Ed Elson?

  Stay with us.

• 43:29Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Welch's Fruit Snacks. Back to school season can be tough on parents, but choosing a snack you and your kids can both get behind doesn't have to be. Stock up on Welch's Fruit Snacks, made with whole fruit and now made with no artificial dyes. It's a snack kids already love and one you can feel good about giving them. Go back to school with Welch's Fruit Snacks, now made with no artificial dyes.

• 43:57Speaker 01

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bull spend. And marketers are calling it out in dashboard confessions.

• 44:06Speaker 02

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.

• 44:13Speaker 01

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 44:27Speaker 03

  Payday bars have a bone to pick with the other candy bars. Enough with the toppings and layers and stuff, kay? Payday bars are just salty crunchy peanuts and sweet caramel. Delicious! Payday Peanut Caramel Bar.

• 44:47Ed Elson?

  We're back with Profi Markets. When you look at the stock market, I mean, the German DAX hit an all-time high. It's up around, I think, almost 15% in the past year. But so is the European stock market, which is way outperforming the S&P. I think it's up almost 10% year-to-date. Is all of that optimism in Europe? Is this all downstream of this U-turn, as you put it, in fiscal spending? Is that what's inspiring this massive surge that is, you know, clearly unique to Europe? It's not happening in America. What is that optimism all about?

• 45:24Speaker 07

  It nicely coincided with this entire debate on Trump session, Trump slump in the US. So you clearly see that investors got afraid about what's happening in the US, so let's move out of the US. Where can we go to? Then at the same time, we had this big, well, and that is historic, U-turn in German fiscal policy, but we also had at least the announcements that Europe as a whole will spend more on defense. So clearly, clearly positive. We also know the good old saying that Europe very often overpromises and underdelivers. But I think that's also important. Most of these things are relative.

• 46:05Speaker 07

  So compared to where we were in January, for example, where we were in endemic growth in Europe, a long-lasting structural stagnation in Germany.

• 46:20Speaker 07

  And and very little positive prospects for this year and even the year after. Plus the looming tariff threat. And I think this is this is the starting point of Europe this year. If you look at the current situation, what has changed? The the delta is clearly positive. The delta is German fiscal policy. EU willing to do more on on defense. And at least while we speak, we don't have the tariffs yet. Well, come April 2nd, different story.

• 46:51Speaker 07

  But so therefore, relatively speaking, the European outlook has improved. I'm always I'm always I I love Europe, but I'm always worn against too much Europhoria. So let's also be clear, because it first really needs to be implemented. But but from where we we were coming from, the the outlook has clearly improved.

• 47:16Scott Galloway?

  Each year, Carson, we make a series of predictions. And one of our kind of our big markets prediction at the end of 24 was that for the first time in a long time, the rivers of capital would reverse flow. Out of everything, it seemed globally flowing into US growth and back out to international markets. And we specifically called out European value. And right now, that it's better to be lucky than good. It appears that is happening. And we've seen a massive uptick in capital inflows to the European market. Do you think this is a kind of a blip? Or do you think that Europe has new life? And potentially, this is this is the beginning of a multi-year trend?

• 47:59Speaker 07

  It's it's more than a blip. It's it's it's somewhere in the middle. I'm still cautious enough to say this is not necessarily the start of a multi-year rally. Let's also be clear. But it's more than a blip, because I really think we will get more fiscal stimulus. Which factors, which drivers?

• 48:24Speaker 07

  Will now decide on whether this could be a multi-year rally or whether it is more short-lived. This is whether Europe, and I'm now looking again at my home country, Germany, will really be able to also implement structural reforms. I think what I was saying is that, you know, spending more money is a good thing. Yeah, it at the current juncture, it is it is a necessity when it comes to defense. And don't expect too much economic growth coming out of these defense spendings, at least not this year and next year. So this is a slow burner for Europe because Europe first needs to build up production facilities on military equipment.

• 49:08Speaker 07

  But infrastructure spending is traditionally positive. But to be very blunt, does 500 billion euro infrastructure spending in Germany now make that the German automotive industry will become more competitive again vis-à-vis China? No, not automatically. So and this is why there is more needed than than only fiscal spending. And if we get this, what is more needed, and that is, you know, topics you all know that this is a bit like in the US, reduce bureaucracy, reduce regulation, but also invest in in education. Also really decide and investigate which sectors are actually

• 49:54Speaker 07

  sources of growth over the next couple of years. In which sectors will Europe be able to compete with China, but also with the US? And I think this discussion is has not really gained momentum yet in Europe. If it does, then I would become more optimistic and could even see a longer period of of higher growth in in Europe. But I'm not overly optimistic yet.

• 50:21Scott Galloway?

  There's always a question as an American living in Europe that how come Europe hasn't been able to establish very many tech unicorns? If you look at the number of unicorns that have come on the scene, the proportion of them is actually still fixed in the US. It appears that the rise of China has come at the expense of Europe. And there's a lot of questions about culture. My thesis has always been in Germany, because they do a pretty good job of creating onramps for, quite frankly, for young men into a decent middle-class life, even without a college degree, that the downside isn't as great, so people aren't as risk aggressive. What do you see happening in the German tech sector?

• 51:04Scott Galloway?

  And I've met the CEO of a company called Salonis, and I'm just curious what you think about software and the German tech environment.

• 51:16Ed Elson?

  This is especially relevant right now because SAP, which is of course, the, whatever you want to call it, the sales force of Germany is enterprise SaaS, they just took the crown as the most valuable company in Europe. They just overtook Nova Nordisk as of this week, now worth $320 billion. So I have the same question as Scott. It looks like maybe German tech is seeing a resurgence, but historically it hasn't been that great.

• 51:42Speaker 07

  I'm a sell-side economist, so I will not give you any trading recommendations or any individual titles. But Scott, let me just start a bit longer, because you're fully right. This is risk aversion, I think, is one of the more general explanations. And I lived abroad for a long while and then came back to Germany 11 years ago. And then you come to your own country, but with a fresh pair of eyes. So and what I noticed in the very, very first day, so you go to a grocery store and then you have this kind of elevator music in the background, plus some commercials. And these commercials were about what?

• 52:27Speaker 07

  You know, security stockings and insurances. So in this way, already somehow telling that we are not a risk-loving culture. We are risk averse. And this applies to actually most of Europe. I would argue this is also one of the biggest reasons why we, for example, need a capital markets union. A European Capital Markets Union, which could then also not only change cultural risk behaviour, but would also allow us that we really have kind of private risk capital. So when you look to tech companies, to startups in general, it is very hard in Europe to get

• 53:10Speaker 07

  funding, and this is why they very often then move to the US. So this is, and we do have many smart people, we do have very good universities at clearly much lower tuition than in the US, but when these smart people then develop something, they will, they hardly ever end up in Europe because they are either not supported by the university or the surroundings, they don't find that there is capital, so they move on. Turning to Germany and tech, we had over the last couple of years, clearly some very interesting fintechs coming out of Germany.

• 53:52Speaker 07

  As I said, sell-side economists, I won't mention any names, but there is clearly something going on. We also had in Berlin, for example, a very, a very good, sound startup community, so that is also something that has clearly been happening. Regulation, access to capital is probably the biggest hurdles in Germany and in Europe to make any startup, including the tech companies, really successful. And this is why, Ad, you mentioned, you know, one of our Champions League players in Germany,

• 54:37Speaker 07

  and you also know when they were founded. So I think, you know, they're, I think they are more or less my age. So this is, this is no longer a young, a young startup. We are coming from behind now, compared with the, with the US, compared with China. You're fully right, Scott, that it looks as if China, you know, took over the European position. And But I think that Europe has understood that an important milestone was this report by Mario Draghi last, the last fall, an important one. Germany's fiscal U-turn now is another important one. Europe never moves extremely fast, but it moves.

• 55:19Speaker 07

  And if Europe now really starts to reduce bureaucracy, regulation, provides better access to risk capital. You know, I'm, I'm still positive that we could see some new unicorns coming out of Europe.

• 55:35Ed Elson?

  Carsten, one final question for me. We've discussed many of the downside risks and the upside risks for Europe. We haven't fully gone into the tariffs. Trump has announced these reciprocal tariffs that are supposed to go into effect on April 2nd. We don't really know the details, but it should affect Europe. Just as we wrap up here, give us a sense of what these tariffs will do to Europe, what Europe's reaction has been and how impactful they might be.

• 56:04Speaker 07

  They will clearly be impactful. Germany exports, I think, 150 billion euro per year to the US. So if, if we were to see 20, 25% tariffs, obviously this is going to hit German and European exporters. To determine the full magnitude is, in my view, impossible because we simply don't know the price elasticity. You know, there, I think, you know, someone being able to, to afford a luxury German car in the US will also be able to pay 20% more on that. But, but it's going to hurt. And that is, I think, the important, the important one. It's going to hurt a, a still hardly growing economy.

• 56:54Speaker 07

  You know what, to me, even more than than only tariffs at the biggest risk for Europe is that if the US administration was also to deliver the tax policies that are there in in the plans. So if the US administration really manages to make the US economy more attractive, then tariffs are not only about this kind of short term shock or negative impact on on Europe, but they are rather the stick to to relocate production out of Europe to the US. And I think that is to me, from a European point of view, the the

• 57:36Speaker 07

  biggest risk for Europe. And and the even more interesting thing right now is that we will have, you know, and that is the the challenging thing for economists these days, how do you how do you forecast the whole thing? You know, we have so two extremely opposing drivers. We have the looming tariffs that are clearly euro negative, and we have the fiscal packages and defense spending that are euro positive. You know, how how do you make a a reasonable growth forecast right now? Extremely hard.

• 58:06Ed Elson?

  Kostan Brzezinski is the Global Head of Macro Research and Chief Eurozone Economist for ING. He previously worked at the Dutch Ministry of Finance and the European Commission. He is 2019 JFK Memorial Policy Fellow at Harvard University and member of the Advisory Council on International Affairs for the Dutch Government and Parliament. Kostin, this was very enlightening. Really, really glad you could join us today. Thank you for your time.

• 58:29Speaker 07

  Thank you, Kostin. Thanks for inviting me.

• 58:33Ed Elson?

  This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Mia Silverio is our research lead. Isabella Kinsel is our research associate. Drew Burrows is our technical director, and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow and join us for a fresh take on markets on Monday.

• 59:31Speaker 08

  When you shop pickup at Kroger, you can expect the savings you love and fresh groceries selected just for you. Our associates are committed to getting every detail right, carefully handpicking your items, checking for quality and freshness, and packing your order with care. Because bringing you fresh, quality groceries is what we do best. And right now, enjoy $20 off your first online order of $75 or more. Restrictions apply. See site for details. Kroger. Fresh for everyone.

• 1:00:01Speaker 09

  Close your eyes, exhale, feel your body relax, and let go of whatever you're carrying today. Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast! And breathe. Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order.

• 1:00:29Speaker 08

  1-800-CONTACTS.

• 1:00:32Speaker 10

  Booking.com is the easiest way. From a day surrounded by noise...

• 1:00:44Speaker 10

  ...to a stay...

• 1:00:47Speaker 10

  ...surrounded by nature.

• 1:00:51Speaker 10

  That's nice. Go on, book it. It's easy. Booking.com. Booking dot yeah.