Pod Insights Freakonomics Radio 119. How Money Is March Madness? About this episode The NCAA basketball tournament grabs a lot of eyeballs, but turning them into dollars hasn't always been easy -- even when the "talent" is playing for free.
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:01 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by PNC Bank. Boring. Great word, bad rep. Yet, time and time again, here at Freakonomics, we find that when something culture-changing happens, boring things like calculations and careful planning are usually behind it. Which begs the question, why not apply it to other aspects of life? Like banking, for example? Well, PNC Bank did, since its inception, proving time and again that the best banking strategy isn't the exciting type, but the steady, reliable, definitely-not-yolo type. PNC Bank. Brilliantly boring since 1865. Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a registered mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC Bank, National Association, Member FDIC.
0:48 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Hotels.com. Hotels.com helps you find and book the right stay for work faster. With business preferences, save your travel must haves, like gym access or breakfast, just once, then get tailored results whenever you search for work travel. Plus, with a free membership, you can save up to 20% on hotels and earn rewards on every stay for future travel. Book now at Hotels.com. Visit Hotels.com for details.
1:21 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Mint Mobile. With Mint Mobile's summer sale, all of Mint's plans are $15 per month, even unlimited. Free yourself from big wireless and switch to Mint for high-speed data and coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com/freak. That's mintmobile.com/freak. Upfront payment $45 for three months, $90 for six months, or $180 for 12 months. Plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50GB may slow when network is busy. Includes up to 20GB hotspot. Capable device required. Availability, speed, and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.
2:11 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.
2:48 Speaker 01 From APM, American Public Media and WNYC,
2:54 Speaker 01 this is Freakonomics Radio on Marketplace. Here's the host of Marketplace, Kai Rizdal.
3:02 Speaker 02 Time now for a little bit of Freakonomics Radio, that moment in the broadcast every couple of weeks where we talk to Stephen Dubner, the co-author of the books and the blog of the same name. It is, yes, yes, it is the hidden side of everything. Dubner, good to have you back.
3:16 Stephen J. Dubner? Hey, Kai, great to be back. Are you a big college basketball fan?
3:19 Speaker 02 You know, medium-ish. I tune in for the tournament.
3:22 Stephen J. Dubner? Okay, so the tournament is just underway. That's March Madness, NCAA basketball tournament. For those who don't know, runs three weeks and every single game now is televised on either CBS or one of the Turner networks. It's remarkably popular, millions and millions of viewers. So I thought it might be fun to just see how good these networks are at turning those millions of viewers into dollars.
3:43 Speaker 02 And how good are they?
3:44 Stephen J. Dubner? Well, before we even get into the actual money, the one striking thing is ownership. So CBS and Turner have locked up March Madness in a 14-year contract, which is in direct contrast to that other marquee sporting event, which is the Super Bowl. That rotates each year between one of three networks.
4:00 Speaker 02 Which is to say the Super Bowl is year-to-year business, March Madness is a steady income, right?
4:05 Stephen J. Dubner? You got it.
4:05 Speaker 02 It's a recurring business, yeah.
4:06 Stephen J. Dubner? You got it. So here's the thing, if I'm one of the three Super Bowl networks, that's CBS, NBC, or Fox, I actually have to root for my rivals during the off-years because I want them to drive the price up because whatever price increase they perform, I then inherit it and get to build on it the following year.
4:22 Speaker 02 Right, for the ad rates, right?
4:23 Stephen J. Dubner? Exactly.
4:24 Speaker 02 All right. So can we then infer that the Super Bowl is more profitable than March Madness?
4:29 Stephen J. Dubner? That was the inference I was interested in finding out, and the truth is, it's really hard to tell. So it depends how you measure it. The Super Bowl ad rates have increased more quickly, more steadily than the NCAA championship game ad rates, but March Madness has done a few other things. They have increased the number of games they show to the point where last year, year-over-year alone, the NCAA tournament was worth 35% more to the networks last year. They took in a billion dollars in revenue, which as of now, makes March Madness the most valuable postseason sports franchise on TV.
5:05 Speaker 02 Well, yeah, but you know and I know, Mr. Dubner, that revenues do not equal profits, my friend.
5:10 Stephen J. Dubner? That is exactly right. And these networks, whether it's the Super Bowl or March Madness, they pay a lot of money for the rights to broadcast and they pay a lot of production costs. Two years ago, CBS and Turner paid more for the rights to broadcast than they took in in total ad revenue. So it's quite possible to lose money. On the other hand, as you know, loss leaders can be nice for a business like a TV network.
5:35 Speaker 02 So where are we? Are we feeling sorry for them? That's not what you're saying, is it?
5:38 Stephen J. Dubner? It's not for me to say whether you should feel sorry for the network. I will say this, from an economic standpoint, it does seem that they're leaving money on the table, however.
5:47 Speaker 02 How so?
5:48 Stephen J. Dubner? Well, you know, the way ads are sold on TV is still pretty old-fashioned. Somebody will set a price, there's a little bit of negotiation. So we thought we could apply a little Freakonomics here and maybe offer some solutions. We talked to Jeff Ely, he's an economist at Northwestern University. He thought it might behoove the networks to think about auctioning off these ad slots.
6:10 Speaker 03 Economists like auctions because... They are kind of the ideal mechanism for finding out how much people are willing to pay for things and at the same time getting them to pay that much.
6:22 Speaker 02 All right, well, so does that shake things up then?
6:24 Stephen J. Dubner? Well, yeah, might shake things up, hard to say for better or worse. If you really want to shake things up, Jeff Ely has another idea. You know, Kai, how every year you hear about the Super Bowl ads that get rejected for one reason or another?
6:37 Speaker 02 Oh, yeah, yeah. So like, like PETA had one at some point, right?
6:40 Stephen J. Dubner? And here's the thing, we remember that and they didn't have to pay for that ad to air. As Jeff Ely points out, it's great publicity, they don't have to pay the $4 million. So here's his idea.
6:51 Speaker 03 I would charge a huge fee to even submit an ad for consideration for the Super Bowl. Everyone who was accepted would have that fee reimbursed and then charge just the advertising rate of having their advertisement aired. And everyone who was rejected would not get their fee reimbursed. And effectively, what I would be doing would be charging for the right to have your advertisement rejected.
7:15 Speaker 02 But, but the, the Super Bowl is like the biggest sporting event on the planet, right? And March Madness, while big, is, is not that.
7:21 Stephen J. Dubner? It is a different, there, there are plainly differences between the two. It's a different event, as you said, they appeal to different constituencies. Also, let me point out one other huge difference that doesn't get discussed very much between March Madness and the Super Bowl, which is the amount of money, of all that money, that goes to the actual talent. So in the NFL, the average player salary is roughly $2 million a year, that's average. In the NCAA, again, these are amateur college athletes, the average salary is exactly $0.00. So one thing we do know for sure is where those hundreds of millions of ad dollars are not going, and that is to the athletes themselves.
7:57 Speaker 02 Stephen Dubner, Freakonomics.com is the website. We'll see you in a couple of weeks, man.
8:01 Stephen J. Dubner? Thanks for having me, Kai.
8:02 Speaker 02 All right, see you.
8:18 Stephen J. Dubner? Hey, podcast listeners. Coming up next time on Freakonomics Radio, we put together a roundtable discussion with some of the biggest brains we could find on how to fight childhood obesity.
8:30 Speaker 04 In grocery stores, unhealthy foods would have to be restricted to certain locations. Abolish sucrose and high fructose corn syrup.
8:37 Speaker 05 Obviously, you can do better than the current tapeworm, but there are some pretty good tapeworms out there right now.
8:43 Stephen J. Dubner? Ideas you probably won't hear anywhere else. That's next time on Freakonomics Radio.
9:00 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by EverPure. Is the value of AI not living up to the promise? The problem is probably your data, not your AI models. When it's scattered across different systems, getting your data AI-ready is a challenge. You keep your AI waiting, and everything slows down. EverPure unifies your data so you can see it, understand it, and control it all from one simple place and get it AI-ready fast. Unlock the true value of your AI at everpuredata.com.
9:33 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible, and when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic Pill does just that. Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 in 9mg, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic Pill.
10:03 Stephen J. Dubner? Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern Company. The world and its energy needs are always changing. Southern Company's commitment to meeting this demand stays the same. That's because Southern Company believes energy is more than a utility. It's what powers possibilities. So they are looking ahead and investing $80 billion in infrastructure upgrades and are committed to fueling growth in ways that benefit all customers so that reliable and affordable energy is accessible for generations to come. Go to southerncompany.com to learn more. Southern Company, building the future of energy.
10:41 Speaker 06 This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often, your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.
Previous 118. Parking Is Hell Next 120. 100 Ways to Fight Obesity Page updated September 30, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
