The project SpaceX's first employee raised $500M for

This Week In Startups is made possible by: Northwest Registered Agent - NorthwestRegistereAagent.com/TWIST Every - Every.io Sentry - Sentry.io/TWIST Today's show: Want to get to space? Several launch companies can help you. SpaceX, Rocket Lab, the Russians, the list goes on. But what about once you make it upstairs, then what? Impulse Space CEO and CTO Tom Mueller is building the next stage of our orbital economy. With its Mira and Helios spacecraft, we'll soon be able to take mass from lower orbits to higher orbits, or even to the Moon, with ease. Meanwhile, venture capitalists are enamored with the idea of humanoid robots — robots share our shape, our work environment, and even our tools. But startups like Dusty Robotics are taking a different tack; instead of building human-shaped robots, Dusty has built a small, wheeled 'bot that can mark out building sites quickly and accurately. And it's doing more revenue than all humanoid robotics companies combined, I reckon. Dusty's CEO, Dr. Tessa Lau, joins Alex to go deep on purpose-built robots in today's build-crazy market. Timestamps: 0:00 Blue Origin, and why fixing things in orbit is hard 2:19 What Mira is and what it does 4:35 Why was the commercial demand for Mira softer than expected 5:20 Space Force demand and the GEO-capable Mira 7:08 Helios: a "rocket on top of a rocket." 10:10 Sentry - Your team should be focused on shipping features — not chasing down bugs. New users can get $240 in free credits when they go to https://sentry.io/twist and use the code TWIST 11:35 How Helios beats Falcon Heavy on price ($25M) 13:35 Reusability, in-orbit refueling, and propellant depots 15:38 Landers, the Moon base, and "Mega Helios." 18:52 NSSL and the politics of flying government payloads 20:16 Every.io - For all of your incorporation, banking, payroll, benefits, accounting, taxes or other back-office administration needs, visit https://every.io 20:51 Why the Moon matters: megastructures and data centers in space 25:09 The space talent market and the SpaceX "mafia." 30:16 Northwest Registered Agent: Get more when you start your business with Northwest. In 10 clicks and 10 minutes, you can form your company and walk away with a real business identity — Learn more at https://northwestregisteredagent.com/twist Subscribe to the TWiST500 newsletter: https://ticker.thisweekinstartups.com Check out the TWIST500: https://www.twist500.com Subscribe to This Week in Startups on Apple: https://rb.gy/v19fcp Follow Lon: X: https://x.com/lons Follow Alex: X: https://x.com/alex LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexwilhelm Follow Jason: X: https://twitter.com/Jason LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis Thank you to our partners: Check out all our partner offers: https://partners.launch.co/ Great TWIST interviews: Will Guidara, Eoghan McCabe, Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Bob Moesta, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarland Check out Jason's suite of newsletters: https://substack.com/@calacanis Follow TWiST: Twitter: https://twitter.com/TWiStartups YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/thisweekin Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thisweekinstartups TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thisweekinstartups Substack: https://twistartups.substack.com

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Hello and welcome back to Twist. My name is Alex. Now, space companies are all over the news. SpaceX has filed to go public, bringing the world's leading space launch and connectivity company to the public markets at last. Blue Origin is in the news for accidentally exploding a heavy launch rocket on its pad, while SpaceX recently had a big success with its Starship craft. Rocket Lab today is worth $67 billion. It's a busy time in the market for getting mass from Earth to space. But what about the same mass once it reaches its initial orbit? What if you need to move a piece of space gear somewhere else? Well, you're probably going to need a new set of tools, a new set of spacecraft, even engines for that work. And that's what Impulse Space is working on. The company just closed a massive $500 million funding round, a Series D,

• 0:44Speaker 00

  that brings its total capital raised over the $1 billion mark. To help us understand Impulse Space's technology, its market, and why its latest Helios craft could put a higher orbits and even the moon into the palm of our hands, please join me in welcoming to the show Tom Mueller, CEO and CTO of Impulse Space. This Week in Startups is brought to you by Northwest Registered Agent. Get more when you start your business with Northwest. In 10 clicks in 10 minutes, you can form your company and walk away with a real business identity. Learn more at northwestregisteredagent.com/twist. Everi, for all your incorporation, banking, benefits, accounting, taxes, or other back office administration needs, visit every.io.

• 1:25Speaker 00

  And Sentry, your team should be focused on shipping features, not chasing down bugs. New users can get $240 in free credits when they go to sentry.io/twist and use the code TWIST. Tom, how you doing?

• 1:39Speaker 01

  Great, great to be here, Alex.

• 1:40Speaker 00

  I'm so excited that space companies are raising enormous amounts of money. It seemed for a long time like it was going to be three AI companies and literally no one else. So before we get into technology, let's talk about the round itself. How hard was it to raise? Did you get all the money you wanted? And how long did it take?

• 1:55Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, fortunately for us, we've had a pretty good time, a pretty good experience raising money. We were oversubscribed on all of our rounds, even since the C round. This one also insiders really wanted to go. We could have waited to raise, but as you said, the market's really hot right now, so why not do it now? We kept upping the size of the round to let in new investors and fulfill our current investors, so it went great.

• 2:28Speaker 00

  Just read between the lines there. It sounds like impulse is absolutely not capital constrained at this point in time.

• 2:35Speaker 01

  That would be true, yeah.

• 2:37Speaker 00

  Would that perhaps be an understatement based on your reaction to my comment?

• 2:40Speaker 01

  Possibly.

• 2:42Speaker 00

  Well, I mean, it's not a bad place to be. You're working on some pretty hard stuff and, you know, I don't mean to be negative about any company's struggles, Blue Origin, but like sometimes things don't go right in space and that's difficult. It's harder to fix something in orbit than it is on a server in Redmond, you know?

• 2:57Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 2:57Speaker 00

  So it makes a lot of sense. Okay. Now I think people have probably heard of impulse space, but I don't think they have a really deep understanding of of what you're building. So let's talk through a couple of your major products and then get into why they matter. Tell me about Mira and what it's for, and then we'll get into Helios right after that.

• 3:14Speaker 01

  So Mira is our highly propulsive spacecraft that can do precision maneuvering. And it has storable propellants, not cryogenic propellants, so it can stay on on orbit for years. It does very fine pointing. It can host payloads. It can, which means they stay onboard and we we we take them around in the youth experiments, which we have going on right now, actually. Or it can deploy payloads, like all of our, all three of our spacecraft that have gone up so far have all deployed CubeSats. It can do rendezvous and proximity ops. We call RPO, which means it can go up to another spacecraft. We did that last year between two of our spacecraft. We got within 1,200 meters of each other.

• 3:52Speaker 00

  Wasn't that with Starfish Space?

• 3:54Speaker 01

  Starfish was the kit onboard and they they were commanding us to to rendezvous up with with our other spacecraft. So really cool.

• 4:02Speaker 00

  I saw that. It's fantastic. So in terms of what people are using Mira for, I know you've had a couple of missions, a couple of launches. But when when people talk about the core use cases for it, is it moving satellites to higher orbits? Is it moving mass around? What's the the most critical thing it does today?

• 4:19Speaker 01

  It was when I first designed it, when we just started the company, it was just our first product. It was it was to go up on, you know, on a transporter and eventually hopefully on Starship. And and be able to move, you know, all this cargo go into orbit. We always say it's like it's like a container ship coming into port. And now you need trucks and vans to to to move this stuff to other places. Like the graphic on your, on, on this podcast, like the trucks in space. I love that.

• 4:47Speaker 00

  Yeah. So, so it's kind of like a pickup truck, essentially. It's, it's functional. It can go anywhere. It's not, it doesn't seem to be the most complicated thing you're going to build. We'll get to Helios in a second. That seems much more complicated. And I presume it's affordable for companies that have a need for it.

• 5:02Speaker 01

  Yeah, it's, it's very affordable. It's like we always told people, if you want to go to a specific spot in space,

• 5:11Speaker 01

  you know, that, that we're, you don't like where transporter, transporter brought you, we can put you in a different spot for cheaper than a dedicated launch like, like on Rocket Lab and it would be less to do that. It turns out, most people were just happy where transporter went. So there, there wasn't that much of a response commercially for it. Although all three of the, of the missions that we've flown have had commercial customers on it. And there's other reasons why it's just not a compelling business case for, you know, for, for that type of thing. Turns out Space Force really liked it. So we've got, you know, over half a dozen of them in, in production right now. Mostly for government stuff. Some of them, the, the new version of the spacecraft is capable to go to geosynchronous orbit to,

• 5:55Speaker 01

  22,000 miles out where the radiation is much worse. We're designed for that. So, and, and some of them are going up there, going up way high.

• 6:03Speaker 00

  And that's predicated on the updated SAF engines that have more thrust, I believe?

• 6:09Speaker 01

  Um, we up, we up the SAF from five pounds to six, up the thrust on SAF from five to six for VAST, basically, for the VAST space station. We, we provided the propulsion system for the VAST Haven One space station. And they wanted a little bit more thrust, so we just ran it a little higher. And, and we're just using those because, you know, it's, it's like the, the version two of, of SAF. It's our latest, latest one, but we didn't really need more thrust for. For Mira.

• 6:35Speaker 00

  Okay.

• 6:36Speaker 01

  We'll take it.

• 6:37Speaker 00

  I'm confused there's not more commercial demand for it because to me, the ability to go from Leo to Gio is, just seems like I think that would happen pretty frequently. What am I missing in the market?

• 6:47Speaker 01

  Mira can't go from Leo to Gio, so.

• 6:49Speaker 00

  Oh, it's more limited than that.

• 6:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, it can move, like it could go from the bottom of Leo to the top of Leo, say from, from 300 kilometers to 1200 kilometers. It can do that, probably up and back. That's, once you're in the orbital band, it's pretty easy, but, but going from Leo to Gio is about, is, is over four kilometers per second. Mira can do 900 meters per second. So we're off by over a factor of four from, that was Helios that can do that.

• 7:16Speaker 00

  We're gonna get to Helios in a second, but for folks who are curious why we're talking about speeds and not height, to make a piece in, a piece of space object go higher, you make it go faster, essentially, Tom, right?

• 7:26Speaker 01

  We talk in terms of delta V. That's, that's how you move around space is you add delta V. Now, you, basically you add impulse, literally impulse is adding delta V. That's, that's the name of our company is adding rocket impulse.

• 7:40Speaker 00

  I thought it was very apt. Okay, so that's Mira. That's been probably what people know about impulse if they've been chucking the company for a while, which brings us to Helios, which is, I think my dad would jokingly say, Mira on steroids. It can go higher, it can go further. It's got more zoom. And as you said, if you want to move things quickly in space, strap a rocket to them. So tell me about Helios.

• 7:59Speaker 01

  Helios is a rocket on top of a rocket. It's, it's basically a third stage that we would add to like, on our first flights on Falcon 9. It has, you know, a big tank, a big aluminum tank that holds 12 tons of liquid oxygen and liquid methane, and it's got a super high performance engine, that guy right there, pump-fed engine that provides 15,000 pounds of thrust.

• 8:23Speaker 01

  Probably going to be the highest performing hydrocarbon engine ever built, very high ISP. And we do two burns. So we get dropped off on a Falcon 9 at 200 kilometers. We do two burns. And you're a GEO 22,000. So in a day, in about eight hours, you're there.

• 8:41Speaker 00

  I have to just plead ignorance on, I think you said ICP? What does that acronym mean?

• 8:45Speaker 01

  ISP is-

• 8:46Speaker 00

  ISP, sorry, yes.

• 8:47Speaker 01

  Specific impulse, which is basically the measure of rocket engine efficiency.

• 8:52Speaker 00

  Okay. No, I knew the term, not the acronym.

• 8:54Speaker 01

  Gas mileage for rockets.

• 8:55Speaker 00

  Yeah. Okay. So we're going to have these up, I think you guys said in 2027. Is that right?

• 9:01Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 9:02Speaker 00

  And talk me through the use cases for this. And maybe if you could, Tom, explain why Helios can do stuff that's more exciting than what Mira could do because it has more power and such.

• 9:12Speaker 01

  So it was designed to, you know, the original use case, when I designed it, was to take a four-ton satellite, which is kind of the GEO market, you know, sweet spot. Four tons directly from LEO to GEO on a Falcon 9, on a rocket that's flying, you know, several times a week. What it does, like right now, most of the commercial GEOs are going on a Falcon 9 to a transfer orbit. And then they use onboard electric propulsion and take up to, you know, up to 10 months to actually get to the final orbit.

• 9:45Speaker 00

  Because electric propulsion doesn't push very hard.

• 9:47Speaker 01

  Right, right. It takes a lot. You're using the energy from the sun that you got to collect over months to make enough oomph to get your impulse to get you up there. So we do it in a day because we, you know, we burn all of this propellant in like 15 minutes into, so you're there. So it basically does what Falcon Heavy does for tens of millions of dollars less money.

• 10:10Jason Calacanis?

  It's the worst nightmare of every founder. You've built a product, everything's working great, then real users start flooding in and suddenly it all breaks. What a disaster. You need to get it back up and running and you got to do that fast. You're looking like an amateur. That's why you need a partner like Sentry. Applications can break in many different ways, but Sentry sees everything. You'll get all the relevant details like stack traces, commits, releases, and even the developers who push that problem code in the first place. With Sentry, you're not going to be jumping around between different tools, trying to figure out what happened. And Sear, Sentry's AI debugging agent, uses all this- This data and context to identify the root cause of the problem and suggest a fix.

• 10:50Jason Calacanis?

  It can even take a look at your code before it ships and warn you if any problems are likely. Try SEER and Sentry for free. If you're a This Week in Startups listener at sentry.io/twist, use the code TWIST for $240 in Sentry credits. Make sure you use that code, make sure you use that URL, sentry.io/twist, so they know your Uncle J Cal sent you.

• 11:13Speaker 00

  So I was reading through you guys' discussion about why Helios is going to help us get to the moon. And I think you said something like you can get three or four tons there, something like 10x less cost. And it struck me as kind of like odd that we've been doing multi-stage heavy launch rockets to get stuff up into higher orbits when your system lets us use a much cheaper rocket with the third stage being already in in space. So why didn't we think of this before? What, it seems obvious now that I've read about it.

• 11:46Speaker 01

  Most launch vehicles have a lot of flights to LEO. So they, all modern launch vehicles have optimized to two stages. In the past, there were three-stage vehicles. In fact, the Russians, the Proton was a four-stage vehicle. So staging is super efficient, but it just adds more cost and more complexity. So you like to only need it when you, or use it when you need it. So we see a need to get to high-energy orbits for Helios. Like you mentioned, we can, we can increase the payload to the moon on a Falcon 9 by about a factor of four in our calculation.

• 12:20Speaker 00

  Oh, four, okay.

• 12:21Speaker 01

  And we've looked at with a Mars case, we can increase the amount of payload to Mars by about a factor of five. So think about that for, you know, our sale, our price for this thing is 25 million and a launch vehicle is like 70 to 100 million. So you're getting five times the payload for only $25 million more, only for like one quarter of your total launch cost. It's such a compelling product.

• 12:49Speaker 00

  It's like, it's like the Falcon 9 moment, but for, for post-launch

• 12:53Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 12:53Speaker 00

  in-space movement. It's the GPT-3 moment for getting stuff to higher orbits and other planets. I, I'm really excited about this.

• 13:00Speaker 01

  It's actually selling pretty, pretty, pretty well for something we haven't flown yet.

• 13:05Speaker 00

  Normally, I wouldn't ask a space CEO this question, but let's, let's, let's do this. How confident are you that it's going to work the first time?

• 13:12Speaker 01

  This is a premium product. That's why we're, we're just taking our time to make sure it's right because it's really got to work. But you know, this is rockets and as we've seen many times, in fact, recently rockets are hard, but man.

• 13:25Speaker 00

  Rockets, rockets are hard.

• 13:27Speaker 01

  We want to not blow up the pad. We just, we want to, we want to make it, right? We want to make it up there. If it doesn't light in space, well, that's bad. But.

• 13:34Speaker 00

  In Blue Origin's defense, it was an amazing audio visual moment, you know? I was very disappointed as someone who really wants to go up to space, that the more, you know, like, like large capacity launch vehicles we have, the lower the cost, the higher my chance of making it up. I was really disappointed for them. I, I hope they, you know, pull it together.

• 13:54Speaker 01

  It was great to hear that they expect to fly again this year. That would be a good recovery.

• 13:58Speaker 00

  That would be incredibly impressive, given all the photos we saw of what was left of their, their launch facility. Now with Helios though, I have a question about reusability or lack thereof, because I know that some companies are working on in orbit refueling. It's always seemed very nascent to me, given that you're putting up this rocket in orbit with a lot of, you know, heavy fuel. I presume that this is a use it once and then let it go off into the void?

• 14:21Speaker 01

  Yes. Yeah. Um, like I mentioned, it's cryogenic and liquid oxygen and liquid methane. So it won't store very long on this stage. If there's no reason that it couldn't be reusable, I would love to reuse it, but it would, it would require propellant depots in LEO and GEO. So you would, you would fill it in LEO, take a payload up to GEO and then, and then refuel partially. You'd only, you'd only have to have a partial refuel to come back down because you're empty. You've dropped your payload. So, and then you could cycle it, but I think we're a ways away from having propellant depots.

• 14:56Speaker 00

  How far are we? For the volumes that you're talking about here.

• 14:59Speaker 01

  Well, SpaceX needs to do it, you know, well, needs to do tankers in order to go to the moon and do the things they want to do. And hopefully, they'll eventually do propellant depots. So probably, you know, five, 10 years out. And there's other companies working on, I've been talking to other companies that are trying to do propellant depots and say, yes, we will buy propellant from you.

• 15:19Speaker 00

  I ask because I was just trying to get my head around what you guys are building and how to think about it in more pedestrian terms to explain to people. And I kind of liked the pickup truck analogy for Mira. I think maybe we could call Helios a semi truck, like an 18 wheeler, bigger, more efficient, goes further, et cetera.

• 15:34Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 15:35Speaker 00

  But I was curious if you're building the vehicles that are going to get us around once we leave our gravity well, or if you're building the transportation network, which would include, I think, not only fuel depots, but also some way to help coordinate inside of the orbital environment. And so how big are your aspirations for the company? Just trucks? Or do you want to be the person who's doing the logistics management as well?

• 16:00Speaker 01

  I haven't thought about that too much, like the gas stations in space yet. I don't think that will be us, but it could be. But one of the things we work on is landers. We had started a Mars lander with Relativity a few years ago. And we're trying to get into the clips, the new NASA moon lander. We're really excited about the moon base and providing supplies there. And also eventually bringing materials back. That's part of our, of our, you know, in space logistics.

• 16:29Speaker 00

  And Helios can get stuff to the moon, quite a lot of it. Does the Helios product, once it's out and, and, you know, flying, does that change dramatically the economics of humans building slash living on the moon? Or is it more of a useful, but more gradual change in that equation?

• 16:49Speaker 01

  I think it, you know, it can, it can, it can provide, it can increase the payload from like 200 kilograms to like, like a thousand kilograms on a Falcon 9. Or it can get you to like three or more tons on a Falcon Heavy.

• 17:08Speaker 00

  Right.

• 17:08Speaker 01

  So we can provide cargo, you know, rovers, things like that to the moon. To do bigger things like, you know, like a human lander or something would require a bigger rocket and something, what we call mega Helios, like a much larger version of Helios. With multiple engines.

• 17:24Speaker 00

  I, at no point in prepping for this chat that I read the words mega Helios. So you're going to have to explain to me how big this bad boy is going to be.

• 17:31Speaker 01

  Well, we've looked at if we, if, if, if we put a third stage on Starship, it would, I'm trying to remember the numbers. It's been a while since we made these numbers, something like 50 tons of propellant and six of, six of these, these engines, the Deneb engines.

• 17:46Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 17:47Speaker 01

  And then we could take like 30 tons, I think to the moon, roughly, rough numbers.

• 17:51Speaker 00

  30 tons to the moon, that's, you could even start bringing liquid water at that point.

• 17:56Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 17:57Speaker 00

  Maybe frozen, but like 30, there's, there's a lot of wiggle room in 30 tons. There's less room in three tons and there's basically no wiggle room at all in 200 kilograms or whatever.

• 18:04Speaker 01

  But this is, this is just an exercise. We don't have, we're not working with, with SpaceX on this. They, they want to do it their way anyway, but um, some, one, one can dream.

• 18:14Speaker 00

  Well, no, I'm glad.

• 18:16Speaker 01

  Look at what we could do.

• 18:17Speaker 00

  I, I like, I like the aspirations of um, of having an even bigger Helios. But okay, let's, let's go back and ground this a little bit. Helios starts to fly next year. You guys said in an announcement that you have, I think a number of customers into 2028. So uh, what industries are most excited about Helios? And what do the first couple of missions, you know, that you can tell me, uh, what are they looking like?

• 18:37Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, we've, we've announced SES, who's, you know, probably the biggest uh, comms satellite company in the world, one of the biggest, you know, uh, flight, they're, we're flying, you know, large, single large payload, like the four ton uh, class that was designed for. And then we have um, the, we've sold a couple of caravans that we call, which is our rideshare. So we can take multiple and uh, who have we announced? Like Astronis is on there.

• 19:05Speaker 00

  Okay.

• 19:05Speaker 01

  And uh, now I'm drawing a blank, but we've got, we've got a few customers on that already too. So.

• 19:10Speaker 00

  So not uh, with Mira, you mentioned that the Space Force really liked it. So this is more, in terms of Helios, we're seeing more private market demand.

• 19:18Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, in order to do government stuff, we have to, we have to be on boarded through NSSL, that the, the National Space Launch uh, Lanes, which is highly contested. This is the thing that SpaceX sued to get into all those years ago. And now, you know, all the new launch guys want to get in there and, and we have to use that too. So it's pretty politically charged and you know, there's, there's a lot of politics around it. But like I said, Helios is such a compelling product. It can help, what, what it can do for commercial, it can also do for government. Okay. I'm pretty confident we're gonna hit somehow flying government payloads. The, I mean, the largest customer in the world is, is the US government. So we, we want to fly their payloads.

• 20:02Speaker 00

  For now, have you seen our debt? I, yeah, sorry, that's, that's an intrusive thought there that I had about the economy. I'm like, yeah, we are right now, but I mean, in 10 years, I don't know, it could be France for all I know.

• 20:13Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 20:13Speaker 00

  I, I, I worry.

• 20:16Jason Calacanis?

  Starting a company is hard enough without having to take on a ton of time sucking administrative work that doesn't move anything forward or improve your product. You need to get back to running your business and clear the back office work from your plate. Every can help you with that. Every is the all in one platform from incorporation to banking, payroll, benefits, taxes, basically your entire back office, and they've worked with over 1,000 startups. If you're just getting started, they're gonna handle your Delaware C corp, your EIN, and getting yourself a registered agent, all with no legal fees or delays. And if you're further along on your founder journey and you need to scale up your team, every will help you hire contractors in over 200 countries.

• 20:59Jason Calacanis?

  Plus, you're going to get 3% cash back on every dollar you spend with your every corporate card. So head over to every.io and stop wasting time on the stuff that isn't growing your company. That's E V E R Y dot I O.

• 21:14Speaker 00

  So you mentioned before we started chatting that the moon's very important to you, and I am curious why that's the case. I am also a, a science fiction dork, you know, dorken, but I'm curious why, why in particular the moon? Because some people say, no, it's too soon. We need to go to Mars instead. We've already been to the moon. So why do you think it matters for, let's keep this a small question, humanity as a whole?

• 21:36Speaker 01

  I think in the near term, the moon is more important because the moon has anything, everything that we would need to build mega structures in space. And what kind of mega structures would we want to build in space? Probably start with AI data, data servers. This is something I've been talking about for a long time. Compute needs to move the space. Power per compute's grown at least 15% per year. That's such a steep exponent that it just becomes crushing after a few decades. So this has always been my thesis. Eventually compute needs to move to space and use the, you know, the unlimited power of space. And it's already happening. Elon's already doing it. And then, and of course, the next thing when you're building mega structures in space is it's literally about 20 times less energy to bring material from the surface of the moon

• 22:21Speaker 01

  to low Earth orbit than it is from the surface of the earth 200 miles up to low Earth orbit. So pretty soon the economics say, let's just get all this material from the moon. And then that's where additive manufacturing and things like that really come in. And Elon's already talking about mass drivers on the moon. So it's already fallen into place, you know, using the moon, the resources of the moon to, to build mega structures in, in orbit.

• 22:45Speaker 00

  So on the subject of, of data centers in space, perhaps on the moon, perhaps in orbit, you know, pick your poison. I was talking to Philip from Star Cloud, you know, before this became a more common point. And he said something very interesting to me. He said, you know, our company, if you want to back it, it's a bet that we're going to see launch costs decline massively. Otherwise it just doesn't make economic sense to take this much stuff up into orbit with our current set of rockets. And this was before Starship's, you know, most recent successful launch and before New Glenn and so forth. How much of your company's success hinges on the same point? Are you dependent on new heavy launch vehicles reaching a frequency of launch that we're still hoping for?

• 23:30Speaker 00

  Or does the company work even with the kind of Falcon 9 generation of, of launch vehicles?

• 23:36Speaker 01

  It works great with Falcon 9. We would love to, to fly on, you know, like on Starship. I think that could greatly lower our costs. We could fly three Helios at a time.

• 23:45Speaker 00

  Oh, wow.

• 23:46Speaker 01

  On Starship. So if, even if Starship was selling at Falcon 9 cost, it would cut our costs in, by a third, our launch cost by a third. So that could, that could really help.

• 23:58Speaker 00

  Okay. And now one thing I saw you guys are working on is engines for landing vehicles. You mentioned that you were working with another company. On a lander from Mars, what's the benefit of vertically doing that yourself versus working with partners? I know that SpaceX, where you used to work, is huge on vertical integration. And so I'm curious how much of that DNA you're kind of bringing with you into your new company.

• 24:21Speaker 01

  We are extremely vertically integrated. Like you asked, we raised a billion dollars. Where does that money go? You know, mostly to become, I mean, for employees, but also to become vertically integrated. Vertically integrated requires a lot of capital. But once you become vertically integrated, you have, you have the power. You have, you have control over your cost, your schedule and, and your quality. So it's really important to become vertically integrated, I think, and especially in the space world because space vendors are notoriously late and expensive.

• 24:54Speaker 00

  Why, why is that? Is that just a lack of competition amongst those vendors?

• 24:58Speaker 01

  It's, you know, it's because the primes don't care. It's cost plus contracting. It just builds up this whole environment, the space industrial complex that's just has this really expensive, really prima donna thing. We always had this quote, you know, the saying at SpaceX. If, if you go for, if you go to ask for a quote for a part and it takes you a month to get the quote, you don't want the part.

• 25:21Speaker 00

  No, nor do you want the price that they're going to charge you for that part.

• 25:24Speaker 01

  Price, the schedule, like it's already, it's already like a preview of what you got here. It's like, no.

• 25:30Speaker 00

  Well, on the subject, a data point that caught my eye, I forget this was in Ars Technica or Space News, but I think it was your president said that you guys don't need new manufacturing footprint here in the States because you have enough space to do all the work that you're doing, which I think is pretty cool. But I'm curious about the personnel side of this. You mentioned the cost of people and it seems that there are more space companies in market than ever, which makes me very excited. But I'm curious what's, what the impact that is on like the space talent market, which I presume is a smaller pool than say software developers.

• 26:04Speaker 01

  Absolutely. We, we see it. It's, it's a little harder to recruit now. Thankfully, we still do it. We're still doing a great job. I think we're a pretty exciting company. So we've been, done quite well. We, you know, we've more than doubled than last year. We just passed 500 employees. We've got open recs for about 200 more. So we're hiring really fast. But like you said, like there's so many startups, a lot of the very experienced people like coming out of SpaceX and other companies are going and starting their own company.

• 26:37Speaker 00

  Yep, yep. I mean,

• 26:38Speaker 01

  and then they're grabbing all their buddies. So it's it's become rarer to get the the truly, you know, like the Tom Mueller's out there.

• 26:46Speaker 00

  So I the last thing I want to do is bang on about someone else's IPO. But I am curious if you foresee a future in which after SpaceX does list, that people become a little bit less attached to the mothership and might be more willing to to break off and come work for, what you might call the next SpaceX like Impulse.

• 27:03Speaker 01

  Yeah, I think so. We'll see.

• 27:06Speaker 00

  I mean, I'm gonna call you about that because I'm really curious because I'm hoping, fingers crossed, that we end up with a like a like a post PayPal IPO explosion, Cambridge explosion of talented founders. Because as much as I like your company and wanted to succeed, I would like to see 10 more. Because I would like to, I would like to get to space as quickly as possible. Okay, before, oh, please.

• 27:25Speaker 01

  Okay, well, I'm I'm just was gonna say, we've already seen, you know, like, like myself, the, you know, the the SpaceX mafia, all these companies like an Elsa gun do in here in this area. All these companies pop, some space companies, robotic company, all kinds of companies. It's just been supercharged now with the IPO.

• 27:43Speaker 00

  Yeah, well, I just I hope that we get even more because I hate I hate driving. I want to go to space and I hate waiting for commercial flight. So there's a lot of stuff that I want to get built. Okay, one last question on the rideshare front. I absolutely love this idea. Can you explain to people who are not familiar with with how this works? What rideshare is for Impulse? And then also what it does to commercial access to this sort of technology? Because I presume that it makes it a lot more feasible for more companies.

• 28:10Speaker 01

  Yeah, it's it's so hard to get to Geo that it's really rare to get a rideshare to Geo. Sometimes, you know, some companies like probably the one of the ones I can think of recently is ViaSat. They fly gigantic payloads like seven ton comms hats. So they require Falcon Heavy. And there's still a little bit of space left. So you can put your 300 kilogram payload on there as a as a rideshare. It's very rare. It happens every few years. Yeah, there's a few others that go there direct, but it's super rare. So there's there's actually quite a backlog of of customers, both commercial and government, that want to go to Geo, small, small ones that want to go to Geo. So we're off since we have the the highway to Geo with Helios.

• 28:55Speaker 01

  We offered this rideshare thing and it turns out is very popular, selling out.

• 28:59Speaker 00

  Yeah, your first, your first actual mission has already been sold out. Do you?

• 29:03Speaker 01

  Yeah, and we're filling a second one.

• 29:05Speaker 00

  Oh, wow. Okay. And then how, how frequently will you run these? Is this something that's going to become like a monthly cadence to GEO? Or is it going to be more of a, a, a one-off event when you?

• 29:14Speaker 01

  It'll be a while before we get to one a month. I think there, I think there's a market of, of, you know, there's probably 20 about things going to GEO a year right now. We could maybe capture half of that with this really compelling thing. So it could be almost on the order of one, uh, once a month. Some of those being rideshares, some just being a large comp set.

• 29:38Speaker 00

  20 things to GEO per year sounds pathetic to me. Is that all we've pulled off as a species? We, it should be at least 2,000.

• 29:46Speaker 01

  Well, remember you can have, you can cover the whole earth with three satellites from GEO. That's the, that's the whole point of GEO.

• 29:53Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 29:53Speaker 01

  You don't need, you know, thousands of them like when you're in LEO. So there's not as many going. It's still a super important orbit, but there's just not, not as many going. And there's only so many orbital spots. Remember like if they're, if they're one degree apart, you have 360. It's just a line around the equator of the earth. So you, you can't pack too many in there because they start stepping on each other as far as signals and, and all that.

• 30:16Jason Calacanis?

  Okay. So you've identified a real problem and you put together a solid solution and a business model that you believe in. So you're all set to launch your new company, right? Not so fast. If you want investors and potential customers to take your new business seriously, you need to consider forming a Delaware C corp. And that's where Northwest Registered Agent comes in. They're going to give your new company a real identity. That means an address for your public filings, a domain, a custom website, a business email, and of course a phone number. And that's going to take just 10 minutes and 10 clicks. They don't charge hidden fees. Customer service is available around the clock. They're not overwhelming your inbox with spam and they make it easy to cancel at any time.

• 30:57Jason Calacanis?

  So get all the advantages of a Delaware C corp, independent, regardless of where in the U.S. you're operating from. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com/twist for more details and the links are in the show notes.

• 31:10Speaker 00

  How much of a problem is going to be crowding in the various tranches of orbit around the planet? Because I keep reading people saying, oh, space trash, oh, explosions, oh, collisions. And everything seems to kind of keep rubbing along just fine, Tom. So is that a real concern in the near term? Or is that more of a, we'll solve it in 100 years when we get there problem?

• 31:26Speaker 01

  I think it's going to be less than 100 years where it's going to require more active management. Certainly, the people putting up large Leo constellations are good stewards. So they're maneuvering, they're bringing them down when they're done, which is what you have to do when you've got so many satellites. We have some other players that are leaving stages up there and polluting space, which is really bad.

• 31:52Speaker 00

  Yeah, I'm not going to list those out just to annoy your PR team. So I'll keep them to myself. But yeah, no, it's a real problem. Tom, an absolute pleasure. Thank you so much for coming on and telling us about this. When you have your next major event, please come back and tell us all about it. Because I, like I said, want to get to space. I think people like you are going to help kind of pave the way. And if it comes down to it, I will ride in a Mira for a little joy ride. If you can put a little hab on there for me, okay?

• 32:16Speaker 01

  Absolutely. Thanks.

• 32:17Speaker 00

  All right, thanks, Tom. Today, we are not going to talk about humanoid robotics. No, no humanoid robots. They get all the headlines, they get all the money. But today, we're going to talk to a company with a product actually in the market with real customers helping move the economy forward using robotics. I know, novel concept. But please join me in welcoming to the show, it's Tessa Lau, the CEO and founder of Dusty Robotics. Tessa, I'm so glad you're here. I'm really sick of everyone showing me one robotic hand moving like a Pokémon card from here to there and claiming that they've revolutionized the world. So to ground us, what does your robot do? And why does that matter?

• 32:51Speaker 03

  We've built the most accurate mobile robot on the planet. And what it does is we are revolutionizing construction by printing floor plans on the floor of construction sites. The reason that's important is because the way buildings get built today is that someone prints out the floor, the blueprints on a big sheet of paper. They take it out into the field and then they're on their hands and knees using measuring tape and string to mark out all of the locations of where everything goes inside the building. We've automated that. Process with robotics and we've built essentially a inkjet on wheels. That goes around, takes that digital version of that blueprint and it prints it on the floor. So that everyone can build exactly what they're supposed to.

• 33:32Speaker 00

  Now, there's a multi-trade element to this because when you're marking out stuff on a floor plan, you're not just putting walls in. I presume there's electricity inputs and all sorts of other materials. So what can your robot actually write down on, I presume mostly concrete?

• 33:47Speaker 03

  Uh huh. So if you've ever built a house or remodeled your house, your architect has probably handed you this huge sheet of papers.

• 33:54Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 33:54Speaker 03

  In that sheet of papers, there's a sheet for every single trade. So you've got one for the plumbers that tell you where all the plumbing lines go. There's one for the electricians that says where the light fixtures go or the light switches get installed. There's one for the, for the, for the framers who like build the walls and put all of those in place. And so what Dusty does is consolidate all of those drawings together and prints them in a single pass over the floor. So that everyone who walks on site, anyone who's installing anything inside the building, they can see exactly what they're supposed to build on the ground and they can see what everyone else is going to do around them. And that eliminates all the conflicts that happen during construction.

• 34:27Speaker 00

  Clearly using a tape measure or a chalk line to lay out designs on a foundation seems to be incredibly risky because humans aren't particularly precise. But is there an element of oops, now we need to change things? So let's say your robot goes out there and does all this excellent printing and then someone has to move a wall. What do you do if you need to get out the big eraser and kind of scratch out part of what you've already laid down?

• 34:51Speaker 03

  We do the exact same thing that they did before we had Dusty, which is they buy a case of concrete colored spray paint and do it again.

• 34:59Speaker 00

  So literally it's white out for the construction industry.

• 35:01Speaker 03

  Yeah, literally, yes.

• 35:02Speaker 00

  That's amazing. I actually didn't know that. That's fantastic. And then talk to me about speed here because I know you guys can take on relatively large floor plans. But when you say an inkjet on wheels, that does not inspire confidence with speed because I've owned a lot of inkjets and they can be patient at times.

• 35:19Speaker 03

  So we are tracking at roughly 10 to 17x the speed of a manual layout crew, which typically means that we can do the same job in about a day that would normally take that crew several weeks.

• 35:32Speaker 00

  And what would the cost of that crew be? How many people are we talking about to go out there and do this by hand? Is it one person and an assistant or is this crew seven to 10 people in three trucks?

• 35:41Speaker 03

  So it depends on the scale of the building, right? And Dusty is being used on everything from single-family homes all the way up to huge data centers. So if you're talking like a huge data center, layout typically takes months. Each crew gets, a crew is probably two to four people. They always go up in pairs because of the process. You need one person on either end of the string.

• 36:04Speaker 00

  Yep.

• 36:05Speaker 03

  And, and they spend weeks dimensioning out and marking out exactly what needs to get installed in that building. And so Dusty can bring that down to days.

• 36:14Speaker 00

  So as we discussed, kind of at both the national and I would say global level, getting to be able to build things faster. Here is a place we can actually go on to essentially any site from a single-family house to a multi-building massive install and cut weeks to months out of the design and building process.

• 36:30Speaker 03

  Exactly right.

• 36:31Speaker 00

  It seems like a massive acceleration. So I guess then one more question about how this works in practice. BIM software, there's many different varieties out there. Do you guys support all of the options? Can anyone bring like any design to you and Euroa can run on it? Or is it only a certain subset of the software people use to design these things?

• 36:49Speaker 03

  So the de facto standard in the industry is Autodesk Revit. So it's pretty much the only solution out there right now. There are a couple of other smaller solutions, but you know, they all speak Revit as the interchange format. And so we support Revit and AutoCAD, which are the two primary solutions for 3D and 2D used in the industry.

• 37:11Speaker 00

  Okay. So actually not a hard standards question then. Pretty much all the customers will come to you with a file that you can quickly read. Is it? Are those large files? Is there any file transfer elements to getting that information on to the robot itself? Or is that just as easy as in getting attachment?

• 37:27Speaker 03

  So the process that we've developed actually has, it starts with plugins for Revit and AutoCAD. And so wherever that design is being created, we have a plugin that sits right there next to you. And that plugin automatically extracts information from those files, pre-processes it a little bit, and then uploads it to our portal. Our portal is where all of those designs come together for the first time. And so all the trades, they all connect up their Revit and AutoCAD into our portal. And that allows everyone to overlay everything and then do some more sanity checks, do some more field verification before they print it. And then from there, it just goes to the robot.

• 38:03Speaker 00

  Tessa, are you telling me that before everyone submits their designs to your portal, they haven't been layered on top of each other yet?

• 38:11Speaker 03

  They have.

• 38:12Speaker 00

  Oh, okay, okay.

• 38:13Speaker 03

  They have. So there's, there's two, there's two types of coordination. The first type of coordination is design coordination. This happens in software. So a GC would typically organize what's called a BIM coordination process, where all those designs get overlaid. And then they do basic conflict checks, like make sure your duct doesn't interfere with my conduit. Right? And because you can only fit one thing in the space at a time. And so you have to resolve that kind of conflict. But even though you have that, that, that coordinated model, it's still not field coordinated. Field coordination is about ensuring that it's constructable, that it matches your existing conditions, that it's buildable. And that typically happens today in the field.

• 38:58Speaker 03

  And so Dusty's portal actually brings that, shifts that left, as we say, and brings it online.

• 39:04Speaker 00

  Okay, so it's not that this hasn't been layered before. It's you're taking those initial ideas and you're applying them more to the real world environment before they go out in the robot to do's. Okay, that makes a lot of sense to me. Now, you guys launched the second generation of the Dusty Field Printer in, I think it was January of 2024. At the time, you guys said you had done 91 million square feet of layout with the preceding generation. So how has the second gen performed? And is there a third one bubbling along?

• 39:32Speaker 03

  We might have been 2025. We should check that because I'm pretty sure it was last year. So our field printer two incorporates all of the learnings that we've made to date from having deployed this thing in the field. So we're constantly getting feedback from our customers, understanding what works, what doesn't work, and turning that into a hardware solution that we can actually sell and and works reliably across a variety of job site conditions. Since we've deployed the field printer two, we've actually completed over 330 million square feet of layout. That's lifetime to date with all of our products, all of our generations. But we it's it's that number is growing. It's accelerating fast.

• 40:15Speaker 00

  I'm curious how quickly. You know, I talked to a lot of people that are building software, and that's the thing that I can call people up and ask how they're using it. A little bit further away from the construction space. So I'm really curious about who are your current largest customers and which sectors of the economy are showing particular demand for bringing more automation into the world of construction?

• 40:33Speaker 03

  Our sweet spot is really large, complex projects, things like data centers and and hospitals. But we've, as I said, we've worked on everything down to single family homes and smaller projects as well. The data center craze is really driving a lot of investment in Dusty because we are really the only solution that allows data centers to get built with less time and less money.

• 40:58Speaker 00

  Which is, I think, everyone's absolute goal right now. I saw a stat that only that 60% of data centers earmarked for 2027 aren't under construction yet. And people are worried that the timelines just aren't going to work out. So anything to remove time. And this actually kind of brings us to the business model in question because when I think about robots and services, you can either sell the device or you can sell the outcome. So how has Dusty decided to approach that? And how has that proved in the market?

• 41:24Speaker 03

  We are currently renting the device. So you can think of it as we sell robot subscriptions. And when you purchase a robot subscription, you it's like leasing a car. You get access to all of the equipment, plus you get a software license that allows you to use the entire system on as many projects as you want.

• 41:40Speaker 00

  Okay, and I know you guys have a series of stuff that will come with the iPad app included. Okay, is there a services component to this? Do, if I was a new customer of Dusty and I was just going to roll this out to my first project, do I need the equivalent of forward deployed engineers to help me get this into production?

• 42:00Speaker 03

  Yeah, so we actually have a services team that trains our customers. So our new customer would pay for an implementation, which includes both the online training of how to use the software tools and plugins, as well as the onsite training, which is how to use the robot in the field. Those are typically two different groups that are using those two different tools. And so that's why we train them separately. But after all of that, you become Dusty certified and then you can, you're, you can pretty much go on your own.

• 42:30Speaker 00

  Yeah, I'm so glad you brought up the, the Dusty certification thing. I didn't realize that you guys had this, oh, here it is, Dusty Academy. So talk to me about how you've built up kind of your own in-house certification system. That's not something that I, that I've seen too much of. So I'm very curious about the why and then the impact.

• 42:46Speaker 03

  My philosophy is all about removing adoption friction. Like, how do we make it as easy to use this thing as possible? Because that's what's going to let us grow faster and faster and faster. And so Academy is really about removing that friction. If people can come to a website, they can self-serve that learning. They can learn how to use the system. They can figure things out on their own, then that speeds us up and it speeds them up too, because they're not waiting on one of us to get back to them with an answer. And so we've actually had some customers just look at the Academy, watch all the videos, and either by the time we show up, they're already pretty much trained, or in some cases, they don't even need us to show up. And we just ship them the system and then they can use it out of the box on their own. And I think that's magical.

• 43:28Speaker 00

  Has anyone tried that and not been able to pull it off? Or is it actually a relatively simple process that, that pretty much any customer can get to fluency with in a reasonable timeframe?

• 43:37Speaker 03

  There's a lot of tech savvy people in the construction industry, especially the new generation who are coming into construction. They're, you know, used to technology. They, they grew up with smartphones and anyone like that who, especially people who have played video games and know how to like, you know, use a joystick, that's just how you run the robot. It's the same thing.

• 43:54Speaker 00

  So what you're telling me is that journalism doesn't work out in the end. I can come be a Dusty Robotics operator.

• 44:00Speaker 03

  Bonus points if you're a gamer.

• 44:01Speaker 00

  Basically, I'm the CEO now is what you just told me. So fantastic. That's tremendous. I do want to go back, though, to the hardware point because I love companies that build hardware. But there's two things that I'm not sure about in your case. One, do you have any supply chain risk? I've spoken to a number of people that are building drones, clearly a different category, but they have a lot of supply chain work they have to do to ensure that certain parts don't come from China and so forth. Does that at all apply to the case of Dusty? And then you guys have done things that are mostly on on flat surfaces so far. I'm curious if there's other applications for your technology inside the construction space that may not be currently attacked by the company.

• 44:37Speaker 03

  So we had the fortune or misfortune, depending, of living through COVID, which was the first wave of massive supply chain disruptions. And so we learned a lot during that process. And so we've managed to figure out how to how to deal with supply chain disruptions. We basically stock up all of the long lead time parts so that when we actually need to build something, we've got all the parts on hand. So that hasn't been impacting us at all.

• 45:06Speaker 03

  Your second question, which I forgot, can you remind me?

• 45:11Speaker 00

  Using similar-ish technology in other parts of the construction process, apart from just doing layouts on flat surfaces, because I think you guys can do some stuff on walls as well?

• 45:20Speaker 03

  Yeah, so it turns out that 99% of construction layout actually happens on the floor first before it gets transferred up. And so we solve all of that. So for example, if you're installing an outlet into the wall, what typically happens is you mark it on the floor first. And what you mark on the floor is that you're going to install an outlet right here, 18 inches above finished floor level. And so we will make those annotations on the floor. And then everyone who can just walk the floor can see exactly where they need to install it up inside the vertical surface. Similarly, for things that go overhead, we mark an X on the ground. And then you take a plum laser and shoot it overhead. And that tells you where to install the thing overhead.

• 45:57Speaker 00

  When this is all rolled out and people see it in action for the first time, do they give you guys high fives for turning what was an artisanal hand done process into something that's dependable, repeatable, and accurate?

• 46:06Speaker 03

  One of our earliest jobs was on a hospital project. In San Jose and this this was during covid, so everyone was wearing face masks even outside on the job site. And and the superintendent, he was like an old grizzled superintendent, he'd been around the block, he'd seen it all. And he was like, I don't trust any technology. He's really grumpy. And then within the first thirty seconds, he started whipping out his tape measure and cross checking and making sure our lines were accurate. And within the first five minutes, he had like pulled down his mask to show its big grin on his face because he loved this so much.

• 46:39Speaker 00

  Well, I mean, it gives everyone the exact same source of truth, right? You can't have discrepancies, debates, you can't have. Oh, I did that in centimeters, not inches or whatever. Like it just it just takes away so much. I it reminds me in a way, I forget the company's name off top, but they're building a robot that just does. Laying of brick walls and I've done that by hand. It's miserable and tricky and not precise and just not something that we are good at as as. Humans and this to me is another place where we can really apply like just machine precision to make something that we all need so much better. So. I I'm curious, are there other parts of the construction? World that you guys want to apply your robotic learnings to apart from what we've discussed so far?

• 47:22Speaker 03

  So the interesting thing about layout is that it sits right right at the center of construction. It's we call it the linchpin. Basically, everything that happens before layout, all the design work, all the preconstruction, it all has to funnel through layout. And then after layout, every all of the work that happens on site, all the execution parts, that all depends on layout. And so if you get layout wrong, right, everything downstream goes sideways. And so everyone knows how important layout is. And so because we started there as our as our first product. Idea, we have we've had market permission to both go upstream and downstream. And that's really exciting because it means that we can move upstream into better design tools, better automation of this process of how does the data get to Dusty?

• 48:07Speaker 03

  In the first place, and it also means we can go downstream, which is. You know, every single person or robot. You know, in the future, that's ever going to build anything on top of a job site is going to be building on a dusty layout, which means that all of the things that we print, we're printing QR codes, for example, and QR codes are the machine readable instructions to all future robots on the job site of where they are and what to do. And we own that translation layer.

• 48:32Speaker 00

  So you are the scribe for all future robots that they'll read instructions off of to do work as we see an expansion of robotics inside of the physical labor element of construction itself.

• 48:46Speaker 03

  We call it the orchestration layer.

• 48:47Speaker 00

  I think this is the first time I don't object to that phrasing. Because usually it's like, we're doing enterprise agentic orchestration, blah, blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, really, are you? But this actually makes a lot of sense to me because everything, bottleneck is the wrong phrase, but you are the thing that everything has to come into and then be based off of. So you're linchpin, whatever the phrase is. On the going backwards from the robot into the world of software to bring things together, it seemed like when you described importing from AutoCAD and so forth, that it was a kind of a solved thing. What can you do on the software side that's still interesting because you've already made it possible to bring in the information, I thought, that people needed to use your robots and therefore build these things?

• 49:27Speaker 03

  So I alluded to this earlier. We're calling it field coordination. So it turns out that even though you've completed a design coordination process and you have a fully coordinated design, which you think is going to be your hospital, the moment that design hits the field, everything goes sideways because the existing conditions are never what you thought. The columns aren't exactly where you wanted them to be. The concrete is inch too short, you know, or maybe some other things happen. And so the field conditions, design never takes into account the field conditions. And so incorporating the field conditions is part of this field coordination process. Also, constructability is another thing that doesn't get reflected in design. People doing design have never spent time in the field.

• 50:09Speaker 00

  What?

• 50:10Speaker 03

  No.

• 50:10Speaker 00

  Buy them a hat. Send them out there, give them a shovel for a week.

• 50:13Speaker 03

  Well, they've never actually like held a hammer and tried to build. And the problem is when you actually try to build, this is why superintendents are so valuable. We have this one story about a staircase. It looked perfect on screen, right? Beautiful design, everything was going to fit perfectly, plenty of space for everything. And the superintendent took one look at that design and said, I can't build that because my guys can't get their hands in between the wall and the staircase to actually install the screws. And so no one was looking for that. On screen, it looks fine. The tolerances match, right? You've got enough space. In the field, you actually need space for people. And that's that field coordination part that typically doesn't surface until you actually hit the field.

• 50:52Speaker 00

  If you were going to go out onto a construction site and find out that the concrete wasn't in short, or that a pillar was in a slightly different location, to me, that requires something like LiDAR or something similar. So are you hinting at a different robot that does something net new? Or is this capabilities you might be able to bring to the existing field printers to collect maybe different types of information that you can put to work?

• 51:20Speaker 03

  So there are existing scanner tools out there. And so, you know, we're not going to reinvent the wheel. What we are seeing is we're, we have a service partner network now. And these service partners are actually bundling together the scanning, the coordination, the Dusty, together into a value-add service that really solves that entire problem for our customers. And so you don't need to learn how to use those things yourself. You don't need to buy, you know, multiple tools. They can package it all up together in a single bundle and, and bring that to your job site.

• 51:54Speaker 00

  Are the margins, when you're working with partners, as attractive to Dusty itself? Or do you lose some economics in exchange for distribution there?

• 52:02Speaker 03

  Well, what we're finding, because our partners are actually bundling together all these different services, they can actually charge significantly more than you would if you're just doing layout.

• 52:10Speaker 00

  Oh, so it's a net positive, both in distribution and revenue terms for you guys?

• 52:14Speaker 03

  Mm-hmm.

• 52:14Speaker 00

  Oh, wow. Well, that brings me to a question about, about capital. I joked at the top that, you know, everyone's freaking out about humanoid robots and throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at companies that haven't really built something that people need to use yet. I, I, I forget the exact number that Dusty's raised. I think it was something like 70 million, give or take, Dessa, somewhere in there?

• 52:34Speaker 03

  That's what we've publicly announced, yes.

• 52:36Speaker 00

  Okay. Ah, good. So I was curious, earlier you mentioned, you know, you stock up on long lead parts. That's not cheap. Building technology, not cheap. Going to market, not cheap. Having two booths at World of Concrete, not cheap. Given the amount of money it's Available for humanoid robots. Is there a similar amount of capital that companies like yours can access in the venture world today? Or are all the VCs so befuddled by humanoids that you're being left outside, if that makes sense?

• 53:01Speaker 03

  I think that there's probably, I mean, the VC world is very, I would say, faddish. And tends to chase, you know, the new hot thing. Right now, I think AI is sucking up a lot of dollars in venture capital. You know, surprise.

• 53:19Speaker 00

  So I'm blown away by that fact.

• 53:21Speaker 03

  Yeah, exactly. And so I think a lot of people are chasing AI companies and AI returns. You know, so the, in the meantime, right, we're here solidly building a company that's got useful product. It's, you know, deployed nationwide and starting to go international and we're solving real pain points for people. And so I think it's just a matter of time until the physical AI part of the world starts waking up.

• 53:46Speaker 00

  I, I agree with that, but when you say that's what we've publicly announced regarding how much money you've raised, that implies to me that you've raised money that I don't know about. Am I reading the implication there correctly?

• 53:56Speaker 03

  I can neither confirm nor deny that.

• 53:58Speaker 00

  I'm going to take that as a yes, we have. No, I won't tell you, but don't blink twice. Okay, I want to wrap up with data centers because I'm curious what you're seeing in the market. I want to kind of step back from Dusty itself and just kind of talk about what you're seeing. Everyone listening to this has been beat over the head with big numbers about CapEx and, you know, how fast these things are going, public complaints about it, water usage, et cetera. But I don't think we have a good feel for, for one, how big these facilities are. And also how many of them are currently in construction. And I think honestly, Tessa, given your company's role, you probably have a really great feel for that. So what can you tell me about the state of the construction rush for data centers today?

• 54:36Speaker 03

  So we follow the data center construction world really closely because a lot of our customers are using Dusty to build data centers. You know, what we're seeing is that because of the improvements in speed, accuracy, workflow that we can introduce, Dusty is starting to become not just a nice to have, but a need to have on data center construction. And so, you know, some of the biggest names in data centers are starting to mandate Dusty, which means that regardless of which general contractor is using, is building their data centers, they're starting to push that requirement down onto their GCs who then come to us and say, hey, you know, we heard about this thing. We are. We need to actually use it.

• 55:17Speaker 00

  Is that because they want to go faster or because they want to be more accurate? Because I can see either one being the lead argument.

• 55:22Speaker 03

  It's all the same. It all boils down to time and money. And so if you save time, then you save money. And if you eliminate rework, then you save time, which means you save money. So it's all the same thing.

• 55:34Speaker 00

  That's fascinating to me. So it seems like you're having a really good kind of market pull moment. Have you had to build like new fleets of the actual Filpprinter robots to meet this demand?

• 55:45Speaker 03

  So it's the same robot. It's the same platform that gets used in data centers versus anywhere else. So no, we haven't. It's just one product.

• 55:53Speaker 00

  I meant, sorry, I phrased that terribly, Dusty. My mistake. Have you had to make more of them? Not a new robot, but have you had to build, you know, expand your fleet that you can send out to two different job sites?

• 56:03Speaker 03

  Yes.

• 56:03Speaker 00

  Decentralized stuff?

• 56:04Speaker 03

  Yeah, we are. We're now about 150 deployed robots all across the US and Canada, which is up, I think, over 100% since last year.

• 56:14Speaker 00

  And where do you think that number will be in this time next year?

• 56:18Speaker 03

  This time next year, we're planning to have around 200 by the end of the year, and then probably even more mid next year.

• 56:23Speaker 00

  Are you seeing rising utilization on a per robot basis as your number of units scales?

• 56:30Speaker 03

  The utilization's actually pretty constant, what we've seen. Although we are actually building new features that actually allow us to increase utilization. So right now, Dusty is most suitable for big, large projects. Data centers, hospitals, you know, anything where you have a big, open floor plate, you can just set a robot loose and run it. And it's been harder to use Dusty on smaller jobs. So for example, one of our customers came to us and said, you know, we build single operating rooms at a time. Like, you know, it's a hospital renovation and they're just like redoing one operating room at a time. But there's so much stuff crammed into that operating room. I would love to use Dusty, but it doesn't work for me right now. And so we've actually developed a new feature that we're calling Flexible Control,

• 57:15Speaker 03

  which allows our customers to operate Dusty in these really environments where they would not have thought to use Dusty before. And so we're basically removing Moving all of these assumptions, like you need a big, open floor, you need survey or control. You need all of these things that allow you to use Dusty. We're eliminating those requirements one by one. And opening up the space to using Dusty on a larger variety of jobs, which is going to increase utilization.

• 57:40Speaker 00

  A larger variety of jobs, some of which are smaller. Now, one thing I pulled into my notes before we jumped on the mic was that you guys can print as close as a one and three quarters inch from any obstacle. Now, if you're doing a big, open floor plan, not an issue, but if you're doing something inside of an operating room layout, there might be stuff that gets in the way. Is that what you're solving for these smaller rooms? Essentially, the ability to get closer to stuff and therefore being able to do more in a small space?

• 58:06Speaker 03

  It's not about getting closer to stuff because our robot already is the the leading robot on the market in terms of being able to get close to stuff. What we've actually done, so a little bit more of the details here for the tech nerds. In order to operate Dusty, you need what's called surveyed control points. So imagine registration markers, you know, with a standard printer. So basically in construction, what that means is around the perimeter of your building, there are points marked at known locations and they're typically put down there by a surveyor who gets brought into, he scans benchmarks that are located in the environment, monuments. If you ever go hiking and you see like a metal plate in the in the earth, that's a monument, right?

• 58:51Speaker 03

  So a surveyor will will know where those are, they'll know how to triangulate off of those monuments and give you a very precise location of a point. And so they'll do that to mark control points all around the building. But if you're in a single operating room, you're not going to bring in a surveyor to scan those monuments and bring control points into that operating room, right?

• 59:08Speaker 00

  That'd be a little silly.

• 59:09Speaker 03

  It's a little silly, exactly. So it doesn't happen. And so our customers can't use Dusty in those situations until now. And so flexible control allows you to operate Dusty without those surveyed control points. It allows you to scan the existing conditions, your walls, your columns, and then align to those existing features so that you can still print accurately within a space.

• 59:31Speaker 00

  That's super, super cool. What's the smallest thing you could lay out with Dusty that is still construction viable? Like, could I do, I'm just playing around here, but like, could I do like a really fancy doghouse layout?

• 59:43Speaker 03

  That would be a very pampered dog. You could if you wanted to.

• 59:49Speaker 03

  Yeah, so what we're seeing is, you know, we joke about the bathroom remodel being kind of like the smallest use case for Dusty. It'd have to be a pretty fancy bathroom, but yeah.

• 1:00:00Speaker 00

  Because an OR, if people don't know, is probably 500 to 700 square feet. Like, they're not, they're not, they're not buildings, but they're also not a closet. Yeah. Okay. Well, fantastic. I'm really excited about your company because I think that it's the most like real world application that I've seen from what I would call the cutting edge of robotics. So, Dessa, my last question for you is pretty simple. Are you going to take this company public? And if so, when?

• 1:00:24Speaker 03

  My dream is to, is to take this company public. I don't have a crystal ball, so I can't tell you exactly when, but we are well on our way.

• 1:00:33Speaker 00

  In terms of scale, maturity as an organization, already have a CFO in place, what's the vector that you're describing there for readiness?

• 1:00:41Speaker 03

  I mean, all of the above. You know, we figured out go to market, we know how to sell. We are, we've created the most recognizable brand in construction tech already. And it's the eyes on the robot, to be honest, that everyone sees and recognizes.

• 1:00:56Speaker 00

  To explain, if you're not watching the, the video version of this that has B-roll attached to it, their robot has two enormous eyes on its front plate and it's incredibly adorable. It's like the construction version of those food delivery sidewalk robots, but cuter.

• 1:01:10Speaker 03

  Yep, exactly. So, we've created all of this amazing momentum, and so we just got to keep executing and doing that, and we will eventually get there.

• 1:01:18Speaker 00

  Well, you couldn't have picked a better time to reach full scale than the current data center build out, because you have just years of tailwinds behind you. So, Dessa, all the best. And when you either announce more money, build a new robot, hit some milestone, hit us up. We'd love to keep track of your success and keep kicking butt.

• 1:01:34Speaker 03

  Fantastic. Thanks, Alex.

• 1:01:36Speaker 00

  Thank you.