Pod Insights Civics 101 What is the Cabinet? And how can appointments work? About this episode Whenever there's an incoming administration, there's a big to-do about Cabinet nominations. So what does The Cabinet DO? How has it evolved since Washington's administration? What is the process for appointing someone to the cabinet? And finally, how could a president appoint someone without approval from the Senate?
Taking us through all the cabinetry is Dan Cassino, professor of government and politics at Farleigh Dickinson University.
CLICK HERE: Visit our website to see all of our episodes, donate to the podcast, sign up for our newsletter, get free educational materials, and more!
To see Civics 101 in book form, check out A User's Guide to Democracy: How America Works by Hannah McCarthy and Nick Capodice, featuring illustrations by Tom Toro.
Check out our other weekly NHPR podcast, Outside/In - we think you'll love it!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:01 Speaker 00 New Senate Majority Leader John Thune incoming next year. Today seemed fairly open to Trump's idea of bypassing Senate approval of his cabinet picks by using recess appointments. Is that how this is going to go down?
0:13 Speaker 01 Checking your ruble. Bitch won't find anything in there that says a dog can't play.
0:18 Nick Capodice? You're listening to Civics 101. I'm Nick Capodice.
0:21 Hannah McCarthy? I'm Hannah McCarthy.
0:22 Nick Capodice? And today, we are answering not one, but two listener questions. We've gotten some amazing ones already. If you want to ask one, just give us a holler at [email protected] . Okay, for today, first off, we've got Maddie from Nashville, Tennessee.
0:39 Hannah McCarthy? Oh, I love Nashville.
0:40 Nick Capodice? Me too. I love the city and the Robert Altman movie.
0:43 Speaker 04 Don't take it easy now. Listen, Dallas, it's Nashville.
0:47 Nick Capodice? And here's what Maddie wrote to us. "I just recently started listening to and very much enjoying your podcast. Can you explain what the president's cabinet does and why they are important? How much power does the chief of staff actually have? Every political TV show, not the strongest frame of reference I know, makes it seem like the president is just a puppet for their cabinet and the people behind them."
1:10 Hannah McCarthy? Interesting. Excellent question, Maddie.
1:13 Nick Capodice? Truly.
1:14 Hannah McCarthy? All right, and what is the other listener question?
1:15 Nick Capodice? Yes, it's tied to Maddie's. This one is from Chris McAdams in Atlanta, GA.
1:20 Hannah McCarthy? Another beautiful city.
1:22 Nick Capodice? Absolutely. Chris writes, "One thing I keep seeing alluded to is that the president-elect can invoke Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution to recess Congress and make recess appointments not requiring Senate confirmation."
1:37 Hannah McCarthy? Oh, yeah. Can we get into that? Can that really happen?
1:40 Nick Capodice? We will get into that, Hannah. We're going to answer Maddie first with sort of a broad overview of the cabinet, and then we'll get to Chris's question, as there are rumblings of President-elect Donald Trump doing just that: recessing Congress to ram through politically unpopular cabinet appointments.
1:57 Speaker 05 Kennedy has been critical of vaccine safety and called for the removal of fluoride from public water.
2:02 Speaker 06 I do think the only way Matt Gaetz will become Attorney General is by a recess appointment. I don't think he can get the votes to be confirmed through regular order.
2:10 Nick Capodice? All right, so push aside the garlic powder and get the red pepper flakes, because today, it's all about the cabinet.
2:18 Hannah McCarthy? Okay, the cabinet. These are the heads of various executive departments. Secretary of State, of the Treasury, of Defense, et cetera, of all 15 executive departments.
2:31 Nick Capodice? Right, and this includes the Attorney General, who is the head of the Justice Department. And sometimes, other people are in the cabinet, too. I'm gonna get to that.
2:38 Hannah McCarthy? Is the cabinet in the Constitution?
2:40 Speaker 07 The cabinet is actually not in the Constitution.
2:44 Nick Capodice? To know him is to love him. Our first face on the Civics 101 Mount Rushmore, Dan Casino. You wanna do the other part?
2:50 Hannah McCarthy? Of course I do. Professor of Government and Politics at Farleigh Dickinson University. I never get tired of saying it.
2:56 Nick Capodice? Did you ever notice that his initials are DC? I never, he probably gets that all the time.
3:01 Speaker 07 The cabinet is implied by the Constitution, but not actually in there. No one in the Constitution says cabinet. We actually have no indication that anyone in the US called it a cabinet until late in George Washington's first term. Cabinet actually is a word like privy. It actually just means like a closet, like a small room. And the idea was that the king in England would consult with his closest advisers in a small room, hence a cabinet. And so cabinet becomes a term that just means close advisers. In the Constitution, there was the idea that the president would have a group of people that he would consult with. All we get in the Constitution about the first cabinet is that the president is, can require the heads of agencies to issue him reports.
3:44 Hannah McCarthy? What were those first cabinet-level agencies?
3:47 Nick Capodice? Well, we had the Secretary of State, who was in charge of overseeing foreign affairs, Secretary of War.
3:52 Hannah McCarthy? Feels pretty self-explanatory.
3:54 Nick Capodice? Yeah. Secretary of the Treasury, also pretty self-explanatory. And the Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer in the country.
4:02 Speaker 07 It's not clear what exactly the job is supposed to be, and we're all just making this up as a go-along. It's all very vague. Remember, this is Article 2 of the Constitution. So, we were trying to knock this out and get it done before Rhode Island showed up and messed everything up. So, it's all a little vague.
4:15 Nick Capodice? And like so many things, if we want to understand the cabinet, we got to look at the first people who had the job.
4:22 Speaker 07 George Washington, though, really does make use of the cabinet in a way that nobody after him really does, which is George Washington says, you know what? I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm not the smartest guy I know, right? The smartest guys I know are Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton.
4:37 Hannah McCarthy? Jefferson being the first Secretary of State and Hamilton being the first Secretary of the Treasury.
4:43 Nick Capodice? Right, and there were the less remembered Edmund Randolph and Henry Knox, serving as our first AG and Secretary of War, respectively.
4:51 Speaker 07 So what Washington does, whenever he faces a difficult problem, he actually convenes his cabinet. He brings together Hamilton and Jefferson and, you know, the other people that no one really cares about. And he says, what am I supposed to do about this problem? And he has them argue. And then he often gives them homework where he will say, all right, you guys have both made good arguments. Go home and write me down what you think I should do. And Washington then looks at what they've written and then just does whatever Alexander Hamilton said to do.
5:18 Speaker 07 So the cabinet under Washington winds up being phenomenally important because this is not only where we get the precedent for how cabinets are going to work, but also this is where the party system in America comes from.
5:29 Hannah McCarthy? Hang on, how does Washington's cabinet create America's party system?
5:34 Nick Capodice? Well, Hamilton and Jefferson famously did not agree a lot of the time. So to convince Washington, they would each go out and try to build up public support for their ideas. And they did this by creating salacious newspapers that talk smack about each other and bolstered their own arguments, dueling newspapers, dueling ideas. And we end up with our first dueling parties, the Hamiltonian Federalists versus the Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans.
6:05 Hannah McCarthy? Quick question here, is the Vice President in the cabinet?
6:09 Nick Capodice? Ah, well, they are now, but they weren't initially.
6:12 Hannah McCarthy? Why is that?
6:13 Speaker 07 The excuse for this is that Washington was very conservative separation of powers, you know, separation between the executive branch and the legislative branch. And because the Vice President has his only powers in the Constitution are legislative in nature, he presides over the Senate. Washington said it was inappropriate for the Vice President to be involved in executive deliberations because that would be a violation of separation of powers. Also, we think he just didn't like John Adams very much. And so this is a good excuse to not have John Adams hanging around.
6:41 Nick Capodice? You know that. I hadn't heard. Now, this did change in the 20th century. Vice presidents began to be included in the cabinet.
6:49 Hannah McCarthy? So Vice President Kamala Harris is in President Joe Biden's cabinet. She is a member of the executive branch, but an officer of the legislative branch.
6:58 Nick Capodice? Exactly.
6:59 Hannah McCarthy? Now, Dan said Washington listened to his cabinet, but other presidents did not.
7:06 Nick Capodice? Yeah, further administrations were far less likely to seek advice from the cabinet.
7:11 Hannah McCarthy? What was the role of the cabinet if not to tell the president what they thought they should do?
7:18 Speaker 07 If we're in the 19th, in 19th century politics, the cabinet is important because the cabinet actually controls a lot of the opportunities for corruption and graft. You know, 19th century politics is all about getting kickbacks. Post Andrew Jackson, you put all your own people in power, right? So the federal government is just filled up with all of your appointees. If you're a Democrat, you appoint Democrats. If you're a Republican, you appoint Republicans. If you're a Whig, if you're a Whig, you don't do anything, but that's the Whig party. So both parties are just filling up everything with their own people. And so you have to put someone in charge of that to make sure that you are putting the right people in place. And how do you know the right people? They're loyal members of your party, and they're going to kick back some portion of their salary to, in order to fund the party and keep the party machine rolling.
8:01 Speaker 07 The cabinet leaders wind up being really important to local politics. If we are in the 19th century, the person who's likely to take over as president, the heir apparent for the current president, is not actually the vice president. It's really the secretary of state is sort of the person who's going to take over as the likely next president. So secretary of state is a really important job.
8:18 Hannah McCarthy? And how many secretaries of state became president?
8:21 Nick Capodice? In the 1800s, an awful lot. Six of them in about 50 years. But that trend ended with James Buchanan in 1850. He was our last one.
8:31 Speaker 07 So Congress, over the course of the 19th century into the 20th century, establishes more and more executive departments. And this gets constitutionally really iffy. Because think about why Congress is doing this. So let's take something, like, I don't know, the Commerce Department. Commerce Department, their job is to kind of standardize measurements and standardize, you know, facilitate trade. Things like, all right, how wide should railroad gauges be so that railroads can go between New Jersey and Delaware? Because Delaware might have different than New Jersey. So we have to standardize all of this, right? This all makes sense. You walk in the hardware store, says, oh, this is an A1 nail versus an A9 nail or A4 paper. Someone has to standardize what the size of nails are, what the size of papers. This all is great and important. Except, this is something that Congress is supposed to be doing under the Constitution, right? This is regulating interstate trade.
9:16 Speaker 07 That's Congress's job. And what Congress decides with increasing frequency over the course of the 19th and into the 20th century is, we're supposed to do this, but, boy, this is beneath our notice. We don't want to bother with this stuff. Also, we don't know what we're doing. We don't know, what size should paper be? What should the railroad gauges be? We don't know! So what are we gonna do? I've got an idea. Let's hire a bunch of experts and then empower those experts to do whatever they feel like they need to do.
9:43 Hannah McCarthy? Oh, okay. So, this ties into what you've talked about with Dan before in that episode that you made on who exactly writes bills. This is the idea that the executive branch is responsible for all of the nuts and bolts, so to speak, of running things. So, they tell Congress what bills they should write.
10:03 Nick Capodice? Yeah. Congress is like, "You experts, you all just take care of it and we'll just agree with whatever you say." And a shift starts to happen, Hannah. The cabinet becomes a body that starts to run things and has less of a role in advising the president.
10:18 Speaker 07 The role of the cabinet throughout the course of the 20th century changes dramatically. So, at one extreme, we've got George Washington, who is relying heavily on the cabinet, right? It's almost like a plural executive, right? He's going through and consulting with the cabinet over almost every major decision he's going through. As the cabinet gets bigger, though, as we start adding more and more departments, presidents are consulting with it less and less and less. Because, as the government gets more complicated, the role of members of the cabinet, the role of heads of department, changes. Because suddenly, your job isn't like Thomas Jefferson to have big ideas about what the government should be doing. Your job is actually running a bureaucracy, right? Department heads are now much more like, you know, the Secretary of the Treasury is
11:02 Speaker 07 not just some guy with big ideas about how to develop America. He's running what's essentially a giant corporation. He's the CEO of the Treasury Department. You know, the Secretary of State is in charge of the State Department. These are huge organizations.
11:16 Hannah McCarthy? Pause here for one second. The executive branch, these various secretaries and the agencies under them, they run things, right?
11:26 Nick Capodice? Right.
11:26 Hannah McCarthy? But the president is the head of the executive branch. So who is in charge of whom? Is it the secretary of, for example, agriculture, who has the final say when it comes to farm subsidies? Or is it the president?
11:40 Nick Capodice? A very good question, Hannah.
11:42 Speaker 07 So if I, as Congress, have now delegated power to an executive department, have I delegated the power to the president? Because that's where all the executive power is. Have I given up my power to the president or to a department? And that gets really tricky. We have inklings of the problems with this going back to the Jackson administration. Right? Andrew Jackson, not really one of your founding fathers. He is an outsider. He is blowing everything up when he gets into office. He doesn't really care for the norms and rules that have gone in before him in the presidency. So when he's in office, he has this big fight over the National Bank. Diddle's Bank War, right? Andrew Jackson does not trust banks.
12:23 Speaker 07 He doesn't trust banks. If you ask him, he'll say it's because of the South Sea Bubble, something that happened several hundred years beforehand.
12:29 Hannah McCarthy? The South Sea Bubble?
12:31 Nick Capodice? I'm not going to get into it. The South Sea Company was involved in enslaving people and whaling. It collapsed. Long story short, Jackson hated the idea of a National Bank. He hated it so much, in fact, that he used his veto power to try to get rid of our National Bank, but it still stuck around. So to put a stake in its heart, he went to his secretary of the Treasury and says, "Take all of the money out of the National Bank."
12:58 Speaker 07 The secretary of Treasury says, "No, that would cause a financial crisis." By the way, he was totally right. It caused a giant financial crisis. What does Jackson do? He fires him and says, "Next guy in line, hey, you going to pull the money at National Bank or not?" And eventually gets somebody who will, in fact, pull the money at the National Bank. This, of course, is going to upset Congress. Like, wait, we delegated this power to the secretary of the Treasury, not to Andrew Jackson? What the heck? Right? Is he allowed to do this or not? And the answer is, well, he did it. So I guess we're playing by airbud rules here.
13:30 Speaker 07 There's nothing that says he can't do it, so he's going to go ahead and make that happen.
13:36 Nick Capodice? Hannah, this happens again and again. Andrew Johnson directly opposes reconstruction policy passed by the majority Republican Congress. So Johnson wanted to fire the Secretary of War, but Congress had passed a law saying a president couldn't do that without consent of the Senate.
13:54 Speaker 07 So what does Johnson do? He fires the Secretary of War. Congress decides, we're going to impeach this guy. We're going to impeach Johnson because he violated the law.
14:01 Nick Capodice? And to be crystal clear about this, Andrew Johnson was impeached, but he wasn't removed from office. The Senate was one vote shy of removing him.
14:12 Hannah McCarthy? Before we move on, you said earlier that other people could be in the cabinet in addition to these executive department heads. Who can be in the cabinet?
14:24 Nick Capodice? So like we mentioned earlier, the Veep is now in the cabinet, but in addition to the executive heads, it can change. For example, as a rule, if you're a Democratic president, the head of the EPA is going to be in your cabinet. If you're Republican, they won't. Sometimes the ambassador to the United Nations is in it. Sometimes they're not.
14:44 Hannah McCarthy? Now, you know, Nick, that I'm a big fan of Leo McGary. I'm tired of it year after year after year after year, having to choose between the lesser of who cares, of trying to get myself excited about a candidate who can speak in complete sentences, of setting the bar so low, I can hardly look at it. They say a good man can't get elected president. I don't believe that, do you?
15:10 Hannah McCarthy? You think I'm that man? Yes.
15:14 Hannah McCarthy? For anyone out there who has not stayed up late at night sobbing over the better seasons of The West Wing, Leo McGary is President Bartlet's Chief of Staff. Nick, is the Chief of Staff in the cabinet?
15:26 Nick Capodice? They have been recently, and this started with some regularity under Richard Nixon.
15:31 Hannah McCarthy? What exactly does the Chief of Staff do?
15:34 Speaker 07 The chief of staff's job, under most presidents, and it does vary by president, the chief of staff's job in general is to control access to the president, to decide which problems are big and important enough that the president has to pay attention to these things. And in effective presidencies, he is the guy who has to go in and tell everybody, no, you're important, but you don't get to talk to the president, you know, to control access to the president. In ineffective presidencies, no one does that. George Stephanopoulos talked about the early years of the Clinton administration, talked about it being like a bunch of eight-year-olds playing soccer, right? Like, everyone in theory has a position, but in practice, everyone's just running around chasing the ball. If you remember, they'll use the Clinton administration, and I do because I'm old, you would notice, yeah, they didn't get a whole heck of a lot done because Bill Clinton was off talking to everybody and having a great time and not actually focusing on
16:19 Speaker 07 the stuff he probably should have been focusing on.
16:20 Hannah McCarthy? Nick, I feel like I have a handle on the cabinet. Now I would love to talk about appointing people to the cabinet.
16:28 Nick Capodice? You got it. We will talk about Senate confirmation, and we're going to get to Chris's question about appointing people during a recess. But first, we got to take a quick break.
16:37 Hannah McCarthy? And before that break, a reminder, you can drop us a line at [email protected] . That is our email address. Ask us your questions, and we will do what we can as quickly as we can. And thank you.
16:55 Nick Capodice? Haven't you out there ever Googled your own name, like, actually done it? You'll find your address, your phone number, maybe even that police report from the time you went to see Rain Man in the movie theater, but you were underage? Maybe that one's just me. But here's the thing, there are companies called data brokers, whose entire business model is collecting your personal information and selling it to advertisers, to strangers, sometimes to people running scams. And once your data's out there, it just keeps circulating. That is where incogni comes in. Incogni contacts data brokers on your behalf and sends them removal requests over and over, so your info doesn't just pop right back up. You set it up once, and they keep working in the background.
17:40 Nick Capodice? You can even track the progress on a dashboard. And for our listeners, we have an exclusive 60% off an annual incogni plan. Just go to incogni.com/civics or use the code civics at checkout. There's a link in the episode description. Remember, they can't harm you if they can't find you.
18:00 Nick Capodice? There is nothing quite like having stuff in your closet that you love and you know you can count on for any occasion, except maybe giving someone else that feeling. And this holiday season, Quince is where I'm finding those pieces. Quince makes elevated everyday essentials using premium materials like Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and it is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories that cut out the middleman, so you get luxury quality pieces without the luxury price tag. As this lovely fall is winding to a close and we slouch into winter, I wish more than anything, someone had gifted me a yak wool hoodie.
18:44 Nick Capodice? I'm dead serious. It's good enough for the yak. I mean, it works really well for the yak, right? It would work for me. And it looks hot. So give the gift of quality this holiday season. Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK as well. And last thing, when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was Civics 101. It's the best way to support the show. All right.
19:20 Hannah McCarthy? We're back. You're listening to Civics 101. Today, it is all about the cabinet. So Nick, appointments to the cabinet happen after a president assumes office, even though to varying degrees, especially as we have seen lately, most incoming administrations make a lot of political hay by revealing who they intend to nominate.
19:44 Speaker 04 Is what we're seeing President-elect Trump do not just in the health space, but in the legal space and in the national security space. A desire, based on the results of the election and Trump's belief that his supporters want him to do this, to seriously disrupt the status quo.
19:59 Hannah McCarthy? Does every cabinet member require Senate approval?
20:04 Nick Capodice? They do indeed, and here's the constitutional chunk tied to this, the old 222. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2. Quote, "He," and he here is the president in the Constitution, "he shall nominate and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for."
20:30 Hannah McCarthy? And how many votes in the Senate does a nominee need to be appointed?
20:36 Nick Capodice? It's a simple majority, 51 votes. Here is Dan Casino again with the Senate confirmation process.
20:43 Speaker 07 So all these agency heads, of course, are subject, first, to approval by the Senate, and, second, to being brought up to the Senate and being forced to ask questions as part of Congress's oversight procedures. And there's been a big fight over the course of the 20th century as to what extent Congress actually can make them answer questions. So if we go back to the 19th century, the idea is, of course, Congress can call up anyone they want and ask them whatever questions they want, part of the oversight, fine. By the time we get to the 20th century, not so much. Think of Dwight Eisenhower. When Eisenhower's in office, we've got the Red Scare, we've got the House Un-American Activities Committee, and Dwight Eisenhower is just sick of these guys. Sick of Joe McCarthy. Joe McCarthy is demanding all the security files and everyone in the State Department,
21:28 Speaker 07 and Eisenhower just goes, "Uh, yeah, no." But once, once you have this United States covered with a network, a network of professors and teachers who are getting their orders from Moscow...
21:43 Hannah McCarthy? No relation. I feel like I have to say that every time Joe McCarthy comes up.
21:47 Nick Capodice? I am in full support of that, Hannah.
21:49 Speaker 07 Now, this is actually a huge power grab on the part of the executive to say, "Yeah, we're going to ignore your oversight power, we're not going to do it." But basically, everyone hates Joe McCarthy at this point, so we're like, "Yeah, all right, that's fine." And not realizing this sets up a precedent where future presidents can go, "Yeah, I don't want this guy to testify, so he's not going to testify."
22:04 Hannah McCarthy? Wait, so nobody testifies before the Senate anymore?
22:08 Nick Capodice? No, no, no, no, they do. This is one of those rare times, Hannah, where a branch sets a precedent that gives them a ton of unchecked power, but then they say, "No, let's just opt to do things the more traditional way."
22:22 Hannah McCarthy? Why?
22:23 Nick Capodice? Because, in the end, everybody has a government to run.
22:28 Speaker 07 At the end of the day, a president can certainly have a big fight with Congress over who testifies, over how much, over what an agency head does. You can fight Congress over that, but the more you fight Congress over that, the less likely Congress is to give you what you want when you're trying to negotiate with them later. And so Congress, as a result, just, presidents, by default, go, yeah, just, you know, play nice, because we're going to need these guys to pass a budget next year. And we don't want to burn all of our bridges right now.
22:51 Hannah McCarthy? I appreciate that, but let's say that there is a chief executive who does not care a bit about burning bridges, and they put forward a nominee who will almost certainly fail Senate confirmation. How could such a president hypothetically bypass this whole process? You've said that recess appointments are on the table. That's a key demand for President-elect Donald Trump. Will you move forward with that? Well, what we're going to do is make sure that we are processing his nominees
23:22 Nick Capodice? in a way that gets them into those positions so they can implement his agenda. How that happens remains to be seen.
23:31 Nick Capodice? So I asked Dan Chris's question directly about recess appointments, and here's what he said.
23:36 Speaker 07 Let's talk a little bit about, with questions that one of the listeners had, which is about recess appointments. Recession appointments, this is in the Constitution. The idea is that if Congress isn't around, because remember, early part of the republic for the 18th and 19th century, Congress wasn't around most of the time. They were back in their home districts. And so, in the Constitution says, you know, if there's no, if Congress is not around, the president can make a recess appointment. And presidents did this with great regularity up until the 1970s. And why did it end in the 1970s? It ended in the 1970s because of Richard Nixon. Presidents were making recess appointments. And presidents, at the same time, were also making use of what we call pocket vetoes.
24:15 Hannah McCarthy? I need a quick refresher here on the pocket veto.
24:18 Nick Capodice? Absolutely. So after Congress passes a bill, it goes to the president's desk. After that, the president has 10 days to sign it into law, or to veto it, to say, no, I don't want this bill, or it does get signed into law. Now, a veto can be overridden if 2/3 of both houses say No, no, no, we really want this bill. And this has happened about 100 times in US history. But a pocket veto is different. It is very sneaky. Bill goes to the president's desk. President doesn't do anything. And before 10 days are up, Congress goes out of session. The bill is in effect vetoed. In fact, it is perma vetoed.
25:01 Nick Capodice? It can't go back to Congress for a potential override. And this, a pocket veto, has happened about 1,000 times.
25:09 Speaker 07 So we have these two powers, recess appointments and the pocket veto, that come into effect whenever Congress is out of session. So Richard Nixon, in his long-term attempts to increase executive power, decide to push the envelope with what counts as Congress being in recess. So sure, Congress between sessions. Well, if you're in, you know, Congress adjourns in the middle of December until the new Congress comes in in January. All right, that's a big recess. Cool. What if Congress goes away for a long weekend? Is that a recess? And the answer is, Richard Nixon says, looks like a recess to me. You guys aren't around. So even if I have a two or three day recess, I'm going to put in appointments.
25:51 Speaker 07 You know, I'm going to put in these appointments and I'm going to even pocket veto bills because Congress is out of session. Yeah. So Nixon pushes the envelope with this. And Congress, jealous of its power, jealous of its authority, pushes back. And Congress has an ingenious plan to make sure the president can't make recess appointments and can't pocket veto bills, which is Congress decides, what if we just never went out of session? How do you do it? Well, every two or three days, when Congress is out of session, you send someone and by someone for most of the 1970s, it being Joe Biden.
26:24 Speaker 06 The youngest new face in the US Senate next year will be that of Democrat Joseph Biden of Delaware. So young, in fact, that at the time of his election on November 7th, Biden was not yet old enough to serve.
26:36 Speaker 07 Because he can just hop on the train and go back to, and go back to the Senate. And he just gavels the Senate in, says, all right, send some session. Oh shoot, no one else is here. Um, all right, cool. I guess send us out of session. And he does that every couple of days. And now the Senate is never at a session for more than two or three days at a time. So therefore, there can be no recess appointments and there can be no pocket vetoes because the Senate is never gone.
26:59 Hannah McCarthy? Has any president in recent history made recess appointments?
27:04 Nick Capodice? No, not really. President Obama did make some, but then the Supreme Court contested them because the recess was only a few days. The Supreme Court ruled a recess has to be at least 10 days for it to be one where appointments can be made.
27:18 Hannah McCarthy? Back to Chris's question, can a president make, like, force Congress to recess?
27:25 Speaker 07 There is a clause in the Constitution that says if the House and the Senate cannot agree on whether or not to adjourn, then the president can force them to adjourn and can call them back when he wants to. Now, this has literally never happened. No president has ever done this. And we first started hearing inklusions, the first time I ever heard about this was actually towards the tail end of the first Trump administration in 2020, when there were conservative legal minds saying that the president should go ahead and do this, should go ahead and adjourn the House and the Senate. And if the president adjourns the House Senate, now they're in recess. And if you adjourn them for 10 days, now they're in recess. So if you give it 10 days, now you can make your recess appointments.
28:09 Speaker 07 And that would be considered kosher.
28:11 Nick Capodice? Just a quick note here, Hannah. Recession appointments only last one year.
28:16 Hannah McCarthy? Really? Just a year?
28:17 Nick Capodice? Just a year.
28:17 Speaker 07 These recess appointments, of course, would be temporary, right? It goes until the, basically, a year and change until the end of the next session of Congress. But that could work. There is also some question about the extent to which you could actually do judicial recess appointments. Could you put a judge in office via recess appointment? And the answer is, air bud rules. Ain't no rules in the dog, can't play basketball. There's nothing that says you can't do it. That would be weird to put a judge in office and have them go away after one year, but you could do it, in theory. So the way it would work is the House of Representatives, which is controlled at this point by Republicans, and is probably controlled by Republicans, would say, "We want to recess right now." And they would send a message to the Senate saying, "We're going to recess." And the Senate
28:59 Speaker 07 would, in theory, go either say, "Okay, cool, we're in recess," at which point you're in recess, you go away for 10 days, president can make a recess appointment, or the Senate would go, "No, we don't want to recess." And the Senate says that, then you've got a disagreement between the House and the Senate about whether or not to recess, and then we have this never before used clause in the Constitution that kick in. The president could go, "Now you're both in recess, and I'll call you back when I want you," in theory, in 10 days.
29:22 Hannah McCarthy? So it could be done.
29:25 Hannah McCarthy? It just has not been done.
29:28 Nick Capodice? Right. And this brings me to the big point here. Regardless of what you feel politically, it has been made abundantly clear that several of Trump's nominees for his cabinet are unpopular, even within the Republican Party. And it doesn't just damage the potential nominee if they have a grueling nomination process, it gets in the way of a new president's agenda.
29:50 Speaker 07 It's generally a bad idea to put up controversial nominations because then that's all you're going to talk about for the first couple of months of your administration. And this is the time when you need to be passing a bunch of bills and you can't because the Senate's all just doing these nominations. It's generally a much better idea, if you want to pass bills, to get non-controversial people in there. And if you want controversial people, great, put them in the executive office of the president, put them in executive agents rather than executive officers, so they don't have to go through the Senate. The other side of this is that if you just do decide to do recess appointments, if you do decide to do pocket vetoes, you are poisoning your relationship with Congress, right? Because Congress, if you go to Congress and say, hey, I need you to pass this bill for
30:31 Speaker 07 me, and you say, by the way, if you don't, I'm going to just do it myself. Well, then why is Congress going to, why is a senator going to put himself at risk by doing, by doing you a favor if you're just going to do it yourself, right? The Senate, I think much more in the House, is very jealous of its prerogatives. And they've historically been very jealous of prerogatives even when the Senate and the president are of the same party. They don't want to lose power, right? They are very worried about the power of the minority and the power of the Senate because everyone in the Senate, almost everyone in the Senate, has been in the majority and in the minority. And anyone who's in the minority in the Senate can tell you, it is a miserable experience, leavened by the fact that you actually do have some power, you have some influence, you can get some things done, or you can at least stop some things from happening. And so they don't want to give up that power.
31:15 Speaker 07 And so it would be a stretch, I think, for the Senate to conspire with the president to remove power from the Senate. And if you do force things through, you've now poisoned your relationship because you're going to have to go back to these guys later and say, hey, can we pass a budget or something? And if you have upset them, if you have declared that they are not relevant, it's going to be real hard to go back and do that.
31:41 Nick Capodice? Have any of you out there ever Googled your own name? Like, actually done it? You'll find your address, your phone number, maybe even that police report from the time you went to see Rain Man in the movie theater, but you were underage? Maybe that one's just me. But here's the thing. There are companies called data brokers whose entire business model is collecting your personal information and selling it to advertisers, to strangers, sometimes to people running scams. And once your data's out there, it just keeps circulating. That is where Incogni comes in. Incogni contacts data brokers on your behalf and sends them removal requests over and over, so your info doesn't just pop right back up. You set it up once, and they keep working in the background.
32:26 Nick Capodice? You can even track the progress on a dashboard. And for our listeners, we have an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan. Just go to incogni.com/civics or use the code civics at checkout. There's a link in the episode description. Remember, they can't harm you if they can't find you.
32:47 Nick Capodice? Last thing about the cabinet here, Hannah. Do you remember in the recent episode about how votes are counted? We talked about people who don't trust the system, you know, deciding to run for county clerk or something like that?
32:58 Hannah McCarthy? Oh, yeah, yeah, of course. People who think that the system is rigged, and so they want to peek inside at that fantasy of this, you know, smoke-filled room with a bunch of ballots just lying around. And then they get in there and they learn that there is no such room. And, you know, it's extremely bureaucratic and fraud-proof in there. And they're like, well, this is more boring than I thought.
33:23 Nick Capodice? Yeah. Dan said a similar thing can happen in the cabinet. When, you know, a president appoints someone to head an agency because they're super loyal to the president and will do whatever the president asks, sometimes even try to destroy an agency because the president doesn't like it. But something tends to happen to these cabinet officers.
33:44 Speaker 07 Cabinet officers, there's a continuing problem. This goes back really to Richard Nixon, right? So Richard Nixon had cabinet departments he was trying to get rid of that he did not like. He put loyalists in those cabinet departments that also didn't like those cabinet departments, right? So you put a guy in charge of the EPA, you know, who used to work for an oil company in the hopes that he will shut everything down. You put someone in charge of the Justice Department that doesn't want to bring lawsuits on behalf of segregation. So you do that. And even Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan after him and every president who comes after it winds up facing the same problem, which is when you put people in charge of agencies, they go to work at that agency every day. They, they work with the people who are running the agency. The people in that agency, the people working with EPA believe deeply in the mission of the EPA.
34:28 Speaker 07 The people working with the Justice Department believe deeply in the mission of the Justice Department. And you work those people every day. And after a while, you wind up going, hey, I think these people are doing some good stuff. And this is a problem every president faces. You put someone in charge of NASA, they wind up thinking NASA is a good thing. And you think you put someone a loyalist who's going to help you shut down NASA or shut down the EPA or shut down the Department of Education, and they wind up being on the side of all the people they're working with. This cabinet is much less about loyalty and much more about being part of this institutional culture. The more you, the longer the time they spend there, the more people tend to agree, yeah, this is a good idea.
35:03 Nick Capodice? But Hannah, presidents can kill an agency. They can do it. They can just zero out a budget request. They can tell everyone in the agency, you know, pack your bags, get out of here. A president can just refuse to appoint anyone at all to head an agency.
35:19 Speaker 07 You could do that. Try and not spend the money that Congress has given to you. But again, anytime you do something like that, you're running into Congress. And Congress, especially in a president's second term, is real worried about their own prerogatives. Because if I'm a member of Congress, I'm a member of the House of Representatives. Yeah, I'm up for election every two years, but I also have a 95% reelection rate. If I know this gemok is over here for four years, I know 90% chance I'm going to be here six years from now. I'm not going to give up a whole lot to help somebody who's going to be gone in four years. So Congress is jealous of its prerogatives. And of course, that's the constitutional design. Congress is supposed to be very jealous of its prerogatives. And whatever a president does, they're going to have to deal in the end with Congress and with Congress trying to hold on to its own power.
36:12 Nick Capodice? Well, there's the cabinet. I'm gonna have myself a cabinet meeting, if I don't mind. This episode was made by me, Nick Capodice, with you, Hannah McCarthy. Thank you. Our staff includes Christina Phillips as a senior producer and Rebecca Lavoy as executive producer. Music! Give me excess of it. Music in this episode from Epidemic Sound, Antitack, Prolator, Blue Dot Sessions, KiloCast, Scott Holmes, Scott Grattan, Hanu Dixit, and my personal appointment to head the Department of Ethereal Music Beds, Chris Zabriski. Civics 101 is a production of NHPR, New Hampshire Public Radio.
36:53 Speaker 04 This is Phil Bradison, former Democratic governor of the state of Tennessee. If you love digging into how history shapes US policy, check out the new season of You Might Be Right. And this is Bill Haslam, former Republican governor. This season, we're asking the questions that have defined every pivotal moment in American political history. Is democracy really under threat, or is that just a story as old as the republic itself? We're tackling the biggest questions shaping the 2026 midterms, so join us. Follow You Might Be Right wherever you get your podcasts.
Previous Trump's "Day One" Promises Next The Supreme Court's Criminal Trial Page updated November 6, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated