UFO Roundtable: CIA Physicist Proves Aliens Exist

He spent decades inside the world's most classified intelligence circles…now quantum physicist Dr. Hal Puthoff and filmmaker Dan Farah reveal why the greatest cover-up in human history may finally be unravelling. Dr. Hal Puthoff is a quantum physicist who has worked with the NSA and CIA, advised the US government on UAP science, and served as chief science advisor to Robert Bigelow of Bigelow Aerospace. Dan Farah is the Director and Producer of The Age of Disclosure, a landmark documentary produced in secret over three and a half years, featuring testimony from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Navy fighter pilots, admirals, generals, and senior intelligence community leaders. They explain: ◼️How the US government has been covering up non-human intelligent life since the 1940s ◼️ Why crashed UAP craft have allegedly been recovered — with non-human bodies inside ◼️How a secret "Legacy Program" operated for decades outside of Congressional and White House oversight ◼️Why UAPs have been repeatedly spotted hovering over US nuclear weapons sites... and switching off missiles ◼️How the US is entered a covert technology race with China and Russia to reverse-engineer non-human craft ◼️What Trump's historic declassification directive actually revealed (and what's still being hidden) ◼️Why Elon Musk may know more than he's legally allowed to say ◼️Why UAP is the most bipartisan issue in Washington right now 00:00 Intro 02:09 Answering the Biggest UAP Questions 05:49 Why A Former Insider Took UAP Claims Seriously 10:02 What Officials Still Refuse To Say Publicly 12:35 The Real Question: Are Aliens Already Here? 13:45 How Claims Of “Non-Human Bodies” Started Spreading 14:13 The Insider Testimony That Changed Everything 19:22 Are There Multiple Types Of Non-Human Beings? 22:14 What US Presidents Are Actually Told About UAPs 23:58 Is The Government Hiding This Because The Public Isn’t Ready? 27:32 What Was Really Inside Trump’s UAP Report 29:00 Why Clear UFO Footage Still Hasn’t Emerged 30:47 How Advanced Civilizations Might View Humanity 39:53 Why Do Advanced UAPs Keep Crashing? 41:06 Does Elon Musk Secretly Know More Than He Says? 45:24 What If All Of This Turns Out To Be Wrong? 50:50 Why NASA Rejects The “Alien” Explanation 55:48 Is “The Public Isn’t Ready” A Legitimate Excuse? 56:22 The One Story That Made A Skeptic Believe 01:08:19 The Pentagon’s Secret Remote Viewing Program Explained 01:18:01 Why Advanced Aliens Might Still Use Pilots 01:21:44 Would Proof Of Aliens Change The Meaning Of Life? Follow Dan: X - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/901y9Jv Instagram - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/CKVZc2a "The Age of Disclosure" Documentary Website - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/CsuWZzQ The Diary Of A CEO: ◼️Join DOAC circle here - https://doaccircle.com/ ◼️Buy The Diary Of A CEO book here - https://smarturl.it/DOACbook ◼️The 1% Diary is back - limited time only: https://bit.ly/3YFbJbt ◼️The Diary Of A CEO Conversation Cards (Second Edition): https://g2ul0.app.link/f31dsUttKKb ◼️Get email updates - https://bit.ly/diary-of-a-ceo-yt ◼️Follow Steven - https://g2ul0.app.link/gnGqL4IsKKb Sponsors: Wispr - Get 14 days of Wispr Flow for free at https://wisprflow.ai/steven Pipedrive - https://pipedrive.com/CEO Bon Charge: https://boncharge.com/DOAC for 20% off

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  There has been an 80-year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life, covered up by elements of the US government. But this past Friday, the first tranche of evidence was released to the public.

• 0:10Speaker 02

  And the evidence is absolutely clear that there is some form of life with advanced technology. They're all over the place.

• 0:17Speaker 00

  But the people involved in gatekeeping this information don't think the public can handle the truth. People have had their lives threatened. A lot of them are free to come forward and tell the White House what they know. And this has been kept from even sitting presidents. And I've interviewed high-level intelligence officials and government officials, and there have been UAP crashes over the years. And in some cases, the crashed crafts had the bodies of non-humans in them.

• 0:40Speaker 02

  And now we have people on ships seeing these things enter the water. We've seen enough times, under enough different conditions, that we just have to accept that it's real.

• 0:49Steven Bartlett?

  So what exactly is inside this report?

• 0:52Speaker 02

  We have so many sightings, even access to materials.

• 0:56Speaker 00

  And there's a number of files, reports, video, and still images that were declassified. And the most notable piece of evidence in there is this.

• 1:05Steven Bartlett?

  So I have so many questions. You're probably familiar with this NASA report. They essentially say that they don't believe that these UAPs are aliens. Why would NASA be lying? Is there a reason why this stuff hasn't been captured on like an iPhone? Are they currently living amongst us? And then, do you trust the Trump administration to release all of the available information?

• 1:23Speaker 00

  I think eventually we'll get to that moment that we've all only seen in movies, where a sitting president steps to a microphone and tells the world we're not alone in the universe.

• 1:31Steven Bartlett?

  Guys, I've got a favor to ask before this episode begins. The algorithm, if you follow a show, will deliver you the best episodes from that show very prominently in your feed. So when we have our best episodes on this show, the most shared episodes, the most rated episodes, I would love you to know. And the simple way for you to know that is to hit that follow button. But also, it's the simple, easy, free thing that you can do to help us make this show better. And I would be hugely grateful if you could take a minute on the app you're listening to this on right now and hit that follow button. Thank you so, so, so much. Dr. Harold, Dan, I wanted to have a conversation with both of you today because you are two

• 2:14Steven Bartlett?

  of the most popular voices online on this subject of UAPs, which is unidentified anomalous phenomena?

• 2:21Speaker 07

  Right, exactly.

• 2:22Steven Bartlett?

  It has been in all the news recently because Trump, a couple of days ago, released 400 classified files containing videos and photos and different reports on this subject of UAPs. Now, I don't have an opinion. I honestly haven't gone that far down the rabbit hole on this subject, but I wanted to have the conversation with both of you because you do have opinions. So, starting with you, Dan, what is your background? And as it relates to the subject of UAPs, what is it that you believe that most people don't know or understand?

• 2:54Speaker 00

  My interest in this topic comes from my childhood. And so over the years, I just, I read every book on the topic, watched every doc. I always wished someone had made a super-serious, credible, sober documentary that only interviews people who have direct knowledge of this topic as a result of working for the US government. And so, got into producing. As I was getting access to high-level intelligence officials and government officials, before I even filmed, really quickly learned how serious and real the situation is, and how serious it's treated behind the scenes. And, you know, I made this movie, The Age of Disclosure, in secrecy over three and a half years. And I would say the headlines that I learned, that the average person doesn't know, is

• 3:37Speaker 00

  that there has in fact been an 80-year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life. It has been covered up by elements of the US government since at least the late 40s. Other nations have also covered this up. And the other major headline is that the people within the US government that have been gatekeeping this, they've also been involved in a high-stakes, secret Cold War race with adversarial nations like China and Russia to reverse-engineer this technology of non-human origin. And the stakes couldn't be higher. Those are the two massive headlines. And I'm proud to say, when the film came out, it created a national conversation at an unprecedented level, and it led to President Trump issuing this directive in the middle

• 4:21Speaker 00

  of February, super-unprecedented historic directive, instructing federal agencies to start declassifying evidence it has, they have, of non-human intelligent life and UAP. And then, that process began this past Friday. The first tranche of evidence was released to the public.

• 4:40Steven Bartlett?

  And during the process of producing this documentary, who did you speak to?

• 4:45Speaker 00

  I got access to the highest levels of government, military, and intelligence community. My interview subjects ranged from Secretary Rubio, who's also our national security advisor now, White House National Security Council members, Navy fighter pilots, admirals, generals, a former Secretary of Defense, the leadership of all the recent classified US government UAP investigations. Every single person is extremely credible. Hal is one of my interview subjects. Hal's one of the most senior scientists to work on this topic for the US government in classified projects. And him and all these other people I interviewed, they had a lot of information they could legally share over the years, but they were always discouraged from doing so, and they

• 5:29Speaker 00

  never really had the opportunity to comfortably do it. No one wanted to be the one guy out on a limb, saying something extraordinary on CNN or Fox or 60 Minutes, and then being subject to the pushback and the ridicule. And so when I realized that, I started socializing, a plan for how to step out of the shadows, arm-in-arm with safety in numbers.

• 5:48Steven Bartlett?

  I'll pick up on that point there, where you talked about safety in numbers. Hal, he mentioned you there. You're part of the documentary. I saw you as well in the trailer of the documentary. What is your background? And why, what reference points are you drawing on to speak on the subject of UAPs and UFOs, et cetera?

• 6:05Speaker 02

  I'm a quantum physicist. I worked for the National Security Agency, for various organizations in the intelligence community, like CIA and so on. And so as part of my technical work, I was also a consultant, chief science advisor to Robert Bigelow of Bigelow Aerospace. He's really quite a titan. I mean, he has two space stations orbiting the Earth. So anyway, those people who are in the space business, and they're moving out into space, they just can't help but wondering, you know, what are we going to run into when we get out there? As a science advisor to him, it turned out that the Defense Intelligence Agency came

• 6:45Speaker 02

  forward and said, you know, "We need to find out really what's going on in this so-called UAP area."

• 6:53Steven Bartlett?

  So you worked with someone called Robert Bigelow?

• 6:55Speaker 00

  He's the guy who knows everything about what is possible, in terms of aerospace technology, and anything that would be in the air or space, simply put. One day, one of his colleagues comes into his office, pulls him into a skiff, and shows him a video that Air Force security guards took over a nuclear weapon site. It was a triangle UAP hovering over a nuclear weapon site. This colleague said, "Please tell me this is one of ours, like one of our black projects, you know, some advanced, cutting-edge technology that's ours." And he knew instinctively it was not. That set him down a rabbit hole. He's like, "There's got to be some office somewhere in the intelligence community that handles UFOs." So he went all over trying to find it, him and his colleague. They couldn't find one.

• 7:38Speaker 00

  So then they determined they were just going to start a UAP program. That program they started was called OSAP. They hired all the team, for example, Hal. And that program started in 2008, and got a lot of pushback behind the scenes, because it turned out, when they looked all over the intelligence community to see if there was another UFO program and didn't think there was, turns out there was one. And there was a deeply-hidden program, referred to as the Legacy Program. And it had been operating in the shadows since the 40s, outside of congressional oversight, outside of the oversight of the White House, completely, you know, off, off-

• 8:14Speaker 02

  Completely hidden away, yeah.

• 8:16Speaker 00

  As hidden as a program can be. And so, they started pushing back behind the scenes against everyone involved in OSAP, because they didn't want anyone else looking into this, right? It started to cause a lot of bureaucratic issues for them, red tape issues, and ultimately, OSAP lost its funding in 2010, despite the fact that it was looking into very real issues like UAP over our nuclear weapon sites. It shut down in 2010.

• 8:40Steven Bartlett?

  Why'd you think it shut down?

• 8:42Speaker 00

  They were dealt these bureaucratic hurdles behind the scenes by people involved in the Legacy Program, people who just caused problems and prevented funding, and-

• 8:50Speaker 02

  Exactly, right.

• 8:51Speaker 00

  It's a lot of, you know, it's a big bureaucracy. People can, people can do things behind the scenes to prevent funding from coming through for programs. And so ultimately, they lost their funding in 2010. And then Jay Stratton and other people involved, they were continuing to look into this, because they, they didn't want this serious national security concern to go, you know, uninvestigated, right?

• 9:14Speaker 02

  So that's how somebody like me gets pulled in. They say, "Okay, these pilots are out there, and they suddenly see craft coming out of the ocean and making right-angle turns at 6G or whatever." And they say, "Oh my God, this is way beyond our physics." So I and other physicists sort of dug into, you know, what could be responsible for this. And we actually found that, just like we use so-called Maxwell's equations and electromagnetic stuff for everything we do in electromagnetics, we have Einstein's equations and general relativity for, you know, black holes and all that kind of stuff. But it turns out, if you could engineer those, you would actually get the same effects that people were observing with these UAP crafts. And we think we've come up with, you know, what it is about the science of it.

• 9:59Speaker 02

  It's just that we don't have the engineering to do it.

• 10:02Steven Bartlett?

  Do you believe in UAPs?

• 10:03Speaker 02

  Absolutely believe in UAPs, because I've been exposed to data about them.

• 10:09Steven Bartlett?

  A more specific question would be, do you believe in aliens?

• 10:12Speaker 00

  Yeah, so, a number of the people I interviewed went on the record stating that they know from their own personal experiences that there have been UAP crashes over the years that have been recovered by elements of the US government, and in some cases, the crashed crafts had the bodies of non-humans in them. And numerous people I interviewed went on the record saying that. And keep in mind, everyone I interviewed only shared what they lawfully could. There was a line they couldn't cross. Everyone I interviewed is aware of classified information they can't talk about, but they went right up to the line and made it clear that there had been recoveries of non-human bodies.

• 10:54Speaker 00

  A couple of people actually testified under oath to Congress, saying the same thing.

• 10:58Steven Bartlett?

  Why wouldn't they be able to talk about it publicly?

• 11:00Speaker 00

  Well, when you're involved in certain programs, you sign certain agreements that prevent you from sharing specific information.

• 11:07Speaker 02

  Highly classified programs, and of course, the big concern is, okay, whatever we might learn about these kind of craft and so on, our adversaries are out there, and probably been, there have been crashes in Russia, crashes in China. And so, if we reveal what we're learning about the subject area and, you know, said it publicly, then it might help some potential adversary-

• 11:32Speaker 00

  Yeah, a saying I-

• 11:33Speaker 02

  -get a step, get a step ahead. So, that's why it's all just kept really close in.

• 11:39Speaker 00

  So a saying that I heard often from my interview subjects, "You can't tell your friends without telling your enemies." Meaning, you can't tell the public what we know and don't know, without also telling China and Russia what we know and don't know. And giving them that information might give them a competitive advantage. And the obvious question anyone would ask when hearing that is then, "Okay, so what's shifted? Why is, why is that no longer the leading thought? Secrecy is best." And the answer is because the US is in a really high-stakes race, a technology race, against these adversaries, to reverse-engineer technology of non-human origin. And the secrecy around it in the US since the 40s has created a scenario where the

• 12:21Speaker 00

  scientific community and academia don't even know it's real. They don't even know it's a valid area of inquiry.

• 12:26Speaker 02

  Don't even believe it's real.

• 12:27Speaker 00

  Yeah, I mean, the smartest kids graduating MIT this year, they are not thinking that this is something they can put their brain power towards.

• 12:34Steven Bartlett?

  So, coming back to the question, do you believe in aliens?

• 12:37Speaker 00

  I 100% believe that non-human intelligent life is here, and has been here for a long time.

• 12:44Steven Bartlett?

  When you say "here," do you mean-

• 12:45Speaker 00

  Earth.

• 12:46Steven Bartlett?

  -currently living amongst us?

• 12:47Speaker 00

  I don't know about the living amongst us part.

• 12:49Speaker 02

  Don't know, don't know about that.

• 12:50Speaker 00

  I don't know about that.

• 12:51Speaker 02

  Wouldn't rule it out, but don't know.

• 12:52Speaker 00

  There is, there is UAP activity being reported on a daily basis by commercial airlines pilot, commercial airline pilots, the FAA, by Navy fighter pilots off the East Coast, being reported, you know, up the military chain of command. And on top of that, regular activity over our nuclear weapon sites inside the United States. It's happening on a regular basis, on the, on the nuclear sites, and on a daily basis in commercial air travel space.

• 13:22Speaker 02

  UAP have come over nuclear missile sites and actually turned off the missiles. And so, you know, when something like that happens, you've just got to take it seriously.

• 13:32Speaker 00

  And the technology that they're displaying is technology that no humans have. And again, there has been some crashes, and in those crashes, there have been the bodies of non-humans.

• 13:44Steven Bartlett?

  How do we know that? How do we know that in those crashes, they've recovered bodies of non-humans?

• 13:49Speaker 02

  The whistleblowers, basically, coming forward from the program.

• 13:52Steven Bartlett?

  So the basis of that evidence is that some people have said it?

• 13:56Speaker 00

  At this point, until, until previously classified information regarding crashes is, and recoveries, is declassified, until that happens, the best we could hope for is credible people putting their reputation on the line to tell you this is what's been happening.

• 14:13Steven Bartlett?

  Did someone during your process of making the documentary, who had seen non-alien, non-human life, non-human intelligence, tell you that?

• 14:21Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 14:22Steven Bartlett?

  Who was that?

• 14:23Speaker 00

  A number of people, but notably, you know, Jay Stratton, who we just talked about-

• 14:28Speaker 02

  Yes, right.

• 14:29Speaker 00

  -who co-created, co-founded OSAP, and then became the director of the UAP Task Force, the largest whole government investigation of UAP ever.

• 14:36Steven Bartlett?

  What did he say?

• 14:37Speaker 00

  He went on the record in the film, saying that he's seen non-human beings and non-human craft with his own eyes. That was the farthest he could go at that point.

• 14:45Steven Bartlett?

  Why did he say he couldn't go further?

• 14:48Speaker 00

  He, he, he had a situation that he was involved in, that for a few reasons, he wasn't, he just wasn't comfortable talking about it yet. And some of it, I think he just wanted to make sure he legally could. Now, going back to credibility, like, take a guy like Jay saying that. When Jay retired a few years back, he was part of the senior executive services of the federal government. That's a level less than 1% of all federal employees ever reach. You know, it's the equivalent of a two-star admiral or general. Very, very senior, very trusted, you know, cleared at a very high level. He had worked with naval intelligence in a senior capacity, he had worked with the CIA, he had worked with the Defense Intelligence Agency as the head of air and space warfare.

• 15:31Speaker 00

  He's a super-serious, credible guy. And he's, he's putting his reputation on the line to share this information to the extent that he legally could and comfortably could.

• 15:43Steven Bartlett?

  And when you asked him why the world doesn't know this stuff, in his view, what did he, what would he say?

• 15:49Speaker 00

  There's a lot of reasons. I mean, certainly, the, you know, the idea that we can't tell our friends without telling our enemies has been a driver. To, just to recap the reasons for secrecy, I actually believe it's better to kind of start from the beginning. When this, when, in 1947, there was a crash at Roswell of non-human origin, and, yeah, RAF captures flying saucer on ranch in Roswell region, yeah. And then this is the image of their cover-up story, trying to show a weather balloon. Yeah, so multiple people might film, go on the record saying the Roswell crash really happened. Technology of non-human origin and non-human bodies were recovered. If you put yourself in the shoes of the military and government at that point, like, put yourself in Truman and, you know, Eisenhower's shoes, you're just coming out of World War

• 16:34Speaker 00

  II. The world was just chaos for a very long time. It's finally starting to settle down. You can't exactly step to the microphone and tell America that there's a new threat that we know nothing about, and we can't protect you from. They're far advanced, you know? What's the advantage of that? So secrecy became the plan at that point, and they had more questions than answers. So everyone I've talked to who gave me context, explained that the, the, the plan for secrecy went in motion there. Let's investigate, let's find out more about what we don't know before we tell the American people. That was quickly followed by the Cold War era, and we learned that Russia also had retrieved technology of non-human origin. And so we knew we were in a technology race.

• 17:16Speaker 00

  So then, the idea of "can't tell your friend without telling your enemy" ruled the day. So now the Cold War mentality, you know, led to more secrecy. And as a security rapper for this, this program that it, that it started, they created the stigma in the late 40s, early 50s, this cultural stigma, this idea that you're crazy if you look into this topic, you're wacky, you'll have your reputation ruined, you'll have your career ruined.

• 17:39Speaker 02

  There was actually a CIA meeting where people got together and said, "Okay, in order to not have people be pursuing this area, let's go out of our way to spread what we would call now disinformation about the subject."

• 17:52Speaker 00

  Basically, the most effective disinformation campaign in the history of the US government, because it got into our culture, some movies were funded that made aliens seem silly, and the idea of life from elsewhere seemed ridiculous, and that got compounded over the years. And then we got to the point where, where we were like, you know, just, just like a few years ago, where the average person just thinks it's not real. You know, the average scientists, academia, you know, they think it's conspiracy stuff, it's nonsense, it's silly. There was no advantage for elected leaders to get in front of this, or for military members to, you know, speak up about what they learned or saw. It would be a career ruiner.

• 18:29Speaker 00

  And that started to shift several years back, when Jay Stratton and Jim Lekaski, when they put together OSAP in 2010, and they started to go out there and collect data and get evidence, and they started to actually share it with the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. And looking at classified data in a classified setting, people like Marco Rubio, who was the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, started to realize, you know-

• 19:00Speaker 02

  There's something here.

• 19:01Speaker 00

  Not only is there something here, but we've got a problem, right? There's a lot of, lot of UAP activity over these highly-classified sites, like our nuclear weapon sites. There's a lot at stake. We are in this, you know, race with other nations, and the stigma has created a disadvantage for us. It's very hard to win a technology race when the majority of your scientists don't know it's a valid area of inquiry, right?

• 19:22Steven Bartlett?

  And do people think that there's one type of non-human intelligence that's visiting the Earth, or is there many, many types?

• 19:28Speaker 00

  People who have been involved in recoveries have said-

• 19:31Speaker 02

  There are at least four types, four separate types. Now, I have not had direct access to that, but I believe the people who I talked to-

• 19:41Steven Bartlett?

  Four different types of life?

• 19:42Speaker 02

  Four different types of life, at least, yeah.

• 19:45Speaker 00

  And the people I've talked to, you know, through the process of making the documentary, both on-camera and off-the-record sources, and the people Hal's talked to over the decades, have said that there are, there have been dozens of recoveries of crashed craft in the US alone. Dozens of craft of non-human origin that either crashed organically or caused a crash, and then recovered.

• 20:09Steven Bartlett?

  And have you spoken to people who, you talked about Jay, have you spoken to other people that have worked on these crashed crafts?

• 20:17Speaker 00

  I've talked, I've talked off-the-record with some people who were involved in recoveries. They would not go on-camera to do interviews. Special Forces people that would not go on-camera to do interviews. One, I actually thought, I've, I've mentioned this in another interview, but, one I thought was going to do an interview, and then a couple of days before, sent me a message saying, "After further consideration and long talks with my wife, I decided I'd be forfeiting my life if I participated in your interview." And I thought that was, like, very unsettling message to get, obviously, but also very specific word choice, you know? Forfeiting my life.

• 20:51Steven Bartlett?

  What did he know?

• 20:52Speaker 00

  He was a special, very senior Special Forces guy who had told me he had been involved in multiple recoveries. That's what he told me.

• 21:00Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 21:02Speaker 00

  And I met him through some high level intelligence people. Early on in my process, I got connected with the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. And they had on their own learned the reality of the situation through the work of OSAP and then ATIP and then the UAP Task Force. And through their own, their own intelligence channels. Leaders on those committees wanted to educate the public about what they could lawfully about this, but they didn't really have a way to do it. It's such a complicated situation. It takes a while to explain it. You can't do it in like a six minute news hit on Fox or CNN, or even like a 15 minute, 60 minute segment. You just can't do it.

• 21:45Speaker 00

  And no one wanted to be the one guy trying to do it. So when I started putting together the film and socializing this safe way for people to step forward. It also quickly became those people's plan for disclosure. That's why Secretary Rubio participated. That's why White House National Security Council members participated. It became amongst the group of people who'd learned the truth. It became the plan for disclosure, the way to bring this information out in a thoughtful way.

• 22:14Steven Bartlett?

  Do the presidents of the United States know about this stuff? Are they aware?

• 22:18Speaker 00

  Historically, no.

• 22:19Steven Bartlett?

  Historically.

• 22:20Speaker 00

  Yeah, and even Rubio says on camera that, you know, historically, this has been kept from even sitting presidents.

• 22:27Steven Bartlett?

  Who would know then?

• 22:28Speaker 00

  So a number of the people in my film break down who's involved in the legacy program. Now, to put it simply, it's elements of the CIA, elements of the Air Force, elements of the Department of Energy, and a few major defense contractors. And they have the ability to access information from a number of federal agencies and branches of the military. But the, the primary leaders of this program are the CIA, the Air Force, the Department of Energy, and major defense contractors. And Rubio breaks down in the film, the way our bureaucracy works. You could have career bureaucrats in positions of power at those organizations for decades. And they can just wait out sitting presidents. They can wait out sitting senators.

• 23:13Speaker 02

  Sitting presidents is just temporary help that are going to come and go.

• 23:17Speaker 00

  And that's what's been happening up until this point now. So the fact that Rubio had learned so much about the reality of this situation and extended the cover up. And then ended up arguably the second most powerful guy in the world as our Secretary of State and our National Security Advisor at the same time. Which has only happened once in US history, Henry Kissinger for two years. No one else has ever had both those jobs at the same time. The fact that he ended up in that position of power and influence after learning the reality of the situation. And right as the age of disclosure is coming out and driving this national conversation. It really led to the current President Trump being informed about this in a way that no president has in a very long time.

• 23:57Steven Bartlett?

  So are you saying that the United States don't think the public are ready to even know that this exists? Because, you know, they could tell us that they have recovered UAPs or aliens, whatever it might be, without telling us about the technology.

• 24:12Speaker 00

  They could, and I think we're going to get to that point.

• 24:13Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think that they were trapped in, in the system that had, that had grown up. And people behind the scenes, working in the classified programs said, well, you know, we don't know how the public is going to respond. So let's be safe and let's, let's just keep it in-house.

• 24:30Steven Bartlett?

  Do you think Trump believes that there are aliens? Cause I, I was looking at some of his quotes and he said, well, I don't know if they're real or not. I don't have an opinion on it. I never talk about it. A lot of people do, a lot of people believe it.

• 24:43Speaker 08

  Barack Obama said that aliens are real.

• 24:47Speaker 06

  Well, he ain't classified information. He's not supposed to be doing that.

• 24:50Speaker 08

  So aliens are real.

• 24:51Speaker 06

  No, I don't, I don't have an opinion on it. I never talk about it. A lot of people do. A lot of people believe it. Do you believe it, Peter?

• 25:00Speaker 08

  Well, if the president can declassify anything that he wants to, so if you want to make an announcement.

• 25:05Speaker 06

  I may get him out of trouble by declassifying.

• 25:07Speaker 00

  One of the things that came out in the age of disclosure is that during Trump's first administration, his cabinet was briefed by the UAP Task Force, by Jay Stratton. And when he briefed them, he was told that they had asked for this briefing. Because they needed to be able to evaluate what the repercussions would be if Trump decided to step to the microphone and tell the world, we're not alone in the universe. Obviously, he didn't end up deciding to do that then. However, in this new administration, he's got Rubio in the position of Secretary of State and National Security Advisor and fully aware of the situation. And that has given him the comfort to put this, this process in motion.

• 25:50Speaker 00

  There's certainly a disclosure process unfolding right now.

• 25:53Steven Bartlett?

  Obama said in an interview that he did with Brian Tyler Cohen, when asked about aliens, Obama said, they're real, but I haven't seen them. They're not being kept to Area 51. There's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President of the United States. Now that sounded to me like kind of sarcasm when he said they're real, but and then explained all that they're not real.

• 26:15Speaker 05

  They're real, but I haven't seen them and, and they're not being kept in Area 51. There, there's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy. And they, they hid it from the President of the United States.

• 26:32Steven Bartlett?

  So it would appear to me that Obama also doesn't know of any aliens.

• 26:37Speaker 00

  I think Obama was largely kept in the dark. I think he does know that the base fact that we're not alone in the universe. And I actually think when he said they're real, I think he was being, that was just candid.

• 26:47Speaker 02

  His honest.

• 26:48Speaker 00

  That was his honest candidate, genuine statement. I think when he then said they're not kept at Area 51, I think he's also being honest because none of my sources say that. Say that UAP and aliens are being kept at Area 51, they're being kept somewhere else. So I think he was being honest there. And I think when he made the comment of unless there's a giant conspiracy, if you watch the tape, he like sips his cup and raises his eyes properly, he said, I think. He knows there's a giant conspiracy. That's the truth. The following day, Trump was asked about that on Air Force One. And he responded saying Obama revealed classified information and he shouldn't have said that. And I think that's the truth.

• 27:28Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 27:28Speaker 00

  I think presidents don't, don't know and they're, and they're told not to talk about it.

• 27:31Steven Bartlett?

  Trump has started to release a lot of classified information around UAP and aliens. The first batch of that was released a couple of days ago. What exactly is inside this report?

• 27:43Speaker 00

  There was a number of files, reports, video and still images that were declassified. This is information that previously had been classified or just never really made public. This was just the first tranche of what has been, what will be released. The most notable piece of evidence in there is an image, a still image from the 1972 Apollo mission. It's an image of a triangle, a seemingly triangle shaped craft hovering above the moon and above the astronauts. And the image was taken from the, from the lunar module.

• 28:23Speaker 00

  And, you know, the UAP Task Force looked into this image years ago and determined it was real. That seems to be the most glaring piece of evidence in this, this tranche. But I will say this, Hal and I both have the same, a lot of the same sources of information. And everyone we've talked to at various federal agencies has told us that when the president gave this directive in the middle of February for federal agencies to declassify evidence of non-human intelligent life and UAP, only a few engaged with it. They only gave a small percent of what they have. And they only had a couple of weeks to do it.

• 29:00Steven Bartlett?

  One of the things I, I think I've always struggled with, with the idea of these kind of conspiracies. Is that I don't know why that information would necessarily fall into the hands of like government officials. Because, you know, alien life forms or UAPs would be visible and would land in anyone's back garden. So you would, you could imagine a world, especially in a world where we have, I don't know, like eight billion iPhones roaming around. Can imagine a world where if there was some kind of UAP crash in my garden, it would be on TikTok within five minutes.

• 29:30Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 29:31Steven Bartlett?

  Or if there were really was.

• 29:31Speaker 02

  Someone got there with an iPhone, you're right.

• 29:34Steven Bartlett?

  You know, there was that incident earlier in the year with those, were they drones in, in America?

• 29:39Speaker 00

  Jersey.

• 29:39Steven Bartlett?

  Jersey. Of Jersey. And that was on social media within minutes and everyone was talking about it and looking at what they were. I don't know, I think in the modern world, because we have so many ways to capture high quality video. If there was something out there, we would have seen a very clear image of this thing by now.

• 29:57Speaker 00

  Well, there's a lot.

• 29:58Speaker 02

  There's a lot that came out in these files because over the years, our sensor systems that the pilots have in their planes have gotten so much better. They've captured really astounding.

• 30:10Steven Bartlett?

  Does this life want to be seen? Do these aliens want us to know that they're?

• 30:13Speaker 02

  I'd have to assume that given the level of quality of their technology, if they didn't want to be seen, we, we wouldn't be seeing them. So it seems like, I would say there's evidence that for whatever reason, they're, they're, they're wanting to be seen.

• 30:28Speaker 00

  But also like I, my personal opinion is that if someone answers that question, they're answering it through the lens of like how humans think, right? For all we know, you know, we're, we're ants to them, you know? You don't hide from the ants, you walk around them, you don't even, but you also don't pay attention to them, you know?

• 30:46Steven Bartlett?

  Based on their behavior from the interviews you've done, how do you think they view us?

• 30:51Speaker 00

  I, I honestly feel like the dynamic is, you know, we are very, very far below them on the food chain. You know, Hal makes an analogy in the film. He says, the ants in your tree line in your backyard, they could be there for generations. You never think about them, you walk around them, you don't, you're not hiding from them, but like they're there and you don't really care, right? But what happens if they evolve one day and out of nowhere, they figured out how to get into your house? And they be lined under your, under your door and they're in your living room, right? We might've evolved technologically over the last 80 years since we cracked the atom so quickly that we're now, you know, the equivalent of the ants showing up in their living room.

• 31:33Speaker 00

  Like all of a sudden, all of a sudden, this warring species, this violent species, humans, you know? We have, we, we progressed so quickly. We went from no real technological progress, progress for a very long time to cracking the atom and then figuring out nuclear technology. And then continuing to increase, you know, our, our nuclear technology development. And, you know, we have this program that has been retrieving their crashed craft and trying to reverse engineer them. So we might be at that point where we're about to do what they do. And all of a sudden, we are a problem. That might be the explanation of why they pay so much attention to our nuclear process.

• 32:12Speaker 00

  You know, there's a lot of UAP activity, not only at the nuclear weapons sites all over the world, but sites involved in the process, the nuclear process, like uranium mines or refineries.

• 32:23Steven Bartlett?

  Is it, you know?

• 32:24Speaker 00

  It might just be, we've gotten to the point where all of a sudden they have, they have to.

• 32:29Speaker 02

  In, in the Soviet Union, the UAP came over and actually started a launch of the Russian missiles. I mean, they actually forced the system to start into a countdown process.

• 32:43Steven Bartlett?

  How do we know that?

• 32:44Speaker 02

  By the intelligence community's access to information about it.

• 32:50Speaker 04

  Every person we spoke to in Belikorovice said they saw a flying saucer on that day. For hours, it hovered over the nearby ballistic missile base. No one had touched any buttons, no one had entered any codes. And yet, as the UFO hovered over the base, the control panel showed the missiles were preparing to launch. For 15 agonizing seconds, the base lost control of its nuclear weapons.

• 33:16Steven Bartlett?

  Logically, I would think that unusual activity would happen around consequential sites.

• 33:22Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 33:23Steven Bartlett?

  You know, I'd be more surprised if there was really frequent unusual activity happening in my back garden, for, for example. But around highly consequential sites, one would expect there to be people flying things around there spying. You know what people are like with cameras these days? They want to take photos of anything interesting. They, they hang around police stations and army barracks.

• 33:41Speaker 02

  Right, right.

• 33:42Steven Bartlett?

  So logically, I would assume that there would be an increased probability of strange activity in the sky above a nuclear site.

• 33:48Speaker 02

  Well, in fact, there was a group of people in the intelligence community who, who recognized exactly what you're saying. And so they decided to, you know, make an attractive magnet by getting a whole lot of nuclear assets in, in one location to see if that would draw them in. And I understand it was successful.

• 34:09Speaker 00

  So, you know, our nation and other nations have figured out circumstances that can, for lack of a better term, bait UAP. A, a, a certain level of nuclear footprint in a, in a small radius tends to attract them. And our nation figured that out a long time ago and so did other nations.

• 34:29Steven Bartlett?

  One of the things that I, I've thought about is, I know, I know very little about physics, but I know, one thing I know is how big the universe is. Now, I'm quite a big fan of SpaceX, I'm actually an investor in the company. And from my fascination with space, I've learned just how big the universe is and how long it would take us to travel from, I don't know, Earth to the nearest galaxy. The closest star system to us, which is called Alpha Centauri.

• 34:54Speaker 02

  Alpha Centauri, right.

• 34:56Steven Bartlett?

  Is over four light years away, which is about 40, 24 trillion miles. If we traveled at the impossible 10% of the speed of light, which is impossible, currently impossible, it would take a ship 40 years to get there.

• 35:11Speaker 02

  Now fortunately, what we learned in looking at what might be the underlying physics and using Einstein's theory of general relativity. It turns out that there are ways of modifying the effective speed of light to make it much higher or much lower. And so you, you, you can do that. So, so when you get into potentially modifying what we call the spacetime metric. You could get to a point where you could make wormholes and warp drives. And those are things that are not off the charts. I mean, they're actually textbooks by general relativity experts on, on the fact that you could re-engineer the spacetime.

• 35:51Steven Bartlett?

  So you're not saying.

• 35:51Speaker 02

  So you could do it, you could get from here to there.

• 35:54Steven Bartlett?

  But you're not saying you would travel in like a, like a, a line like you do in a plane, right?

• 36:00Speaker 02

  Well, you could, you, you could. It, if, if you arrange for the effective speed of light in that line to be much higher, then without breaking the speed of light, you can zoom over there very quickly. So even, even in, in a straight line.

• 36:18Steven Bartlett?

  But no, no one at the moment knows how to do that on Earth.

• 36:22Speaker 02

  We can write the equations and see how it doesn't violate our physics equations, but we don't have the engineering prowess.

• 36:31Speaker 00

  So we figured out, basically, we figured out how these, how these craft are operating, the theory of it. But we don't have the material sciences right, right to replicate it.

• 36:41Steven Bartlett?

  What I'm pointing out is if you travel at that speed across the universe, if you even hit, I don't know, an object the size of a pebble, it would be like a nuclear explosion.

• 36:50Speaker 02

  Yeah, but the thing is, if you're modifying space, it's sort of like making like, like a surfer wave on, on, on, you know, at the seashore. You, you arrange to have space moving ahead like that. So you come up to a rock, it's just going to push it aside. So you can engineer that.

• 37:09Speaker 00

  This is how I've wrapped my head around it. Essentially, they're, they're warping spacetime in a localized area. They're creating an immense amount of energy around the craft and it creates essentially a bubble around the craft. And that bubble separates the craft from the environment around it. So the environment has no, no impact on the craft. That's why we see transmedium travel, like a craft going, you know, smooth from space to air to the water without even a splash. The environment around the bubble has no bearing on the craft inside it. And the craft inside it is in its own spacetime. And once you wrap your head around that, then things like interstellar travel become totally possible.

• 37:49Steven Bartlett?

  I'm 100% more productive using this app despite spending 50% less time typing. And that might confuse you, but let me explain, which is exactly why I invested in Wispr Flow. They're also one of our sponsors on this podcast. Wispr Flow turns your speech into text so you can send it in any app or device at any time. And I promise you, it doesn't seem to ever make mistakes. This is the most accurate voice dictation I have ever used after a decade of trying to get one to work. Not only does it save me a ton of time, it also corrects your speech if you change your mind mid-sentence before turning it into text on the device. I love it and I know my team loves it too, because when I posted it in our Slack channel, asking if anybody wanted a pro version, half the office said yes, and they had it within an hour, which tells me everything.

• 38:33Steven Bartlett?

  This is the tool you and your team need to speed yourselves up and to capture those important ideas so that they don't disappear. Head over to wisprflow.ai/steven to download it now. That's W I S P R F L O W dot A I slash Steven. I run multiple companies that have multiple sales teams. And one of the things as a founder of a company that's often confusing is you find it hard to figure out where sales are. So about 10 years ago, I started using Pipe Drive in my former company. And it's also the reason why I switched over all of my commercial teams in my current media company called Steven.com to use Pipe Drive as well. Not only do they sponsor the show, but they've been an incredibly effective way of scaling our sales engine over the years. Pipe Drive is an easy to use intelligent CRM.

• 39:17Steven Bartlett?

  And at its very core, it makes your sales process visible through one dashboard, a visual pipeline, showing every deal, what stage it's in, what needs to happen next. And it's all in real time with no delay. It doesn't magically close the deal for you, of course, but it does replace complexity with clarity. If you want to join over 100,000 companies already using Pipe Drive, you can use my link for a 30 day free trial with no credit card payment needed. Head to pipedrive.com/CEO to get started. That's pipedrive.com/CEO. I'll see you over there. One of the paradoxes with this is they appear to be such, so advanced in their physics and their technology, if I should call it that.

• 40:01Steven Bartlett?

  But at the same time, they seem to be crashing a lot, which is a bit of a paradox.

• 40:05Speaker 02

  Actually, some of them have not crashed, but have been simply left in the desert. Sort of like a gift or a donation. We're still trying to figure that out. So, I mean, some of them do, do, do crash and, and it can have maybe some of our electromagnetic pulsing and laser policy can interfere with their technology. And, and you might get a crash.

• 40:30Steven Bartlett?

  Why don't you, why do you think another country hasn't come forward with similar disclosures and similar evidence?

• 40:37Speaker 00

  I actually think there's a really simple answer for that. I think our allies follow the US's lead.

• 40:43Steven Bartlett?

  Right.

• 40:43Speaker 00

  And I think our adversaries, primarily China and Russia, have no reason to go public. They don't have the same sort of societies and dynamics, like she can do what he wants anyway. What's, what's the advantage to him? Same thing with Putin, you know, there is no advantage. And when you look at it that way, you really quickly get to the, you know, this is the way it is for that reason.

• 41:06Steven Bartlett?

  They did a study in 2026 and found that 45 planets are likely capable of supporting life. They call this the habitable zone out of more than 6,000 planets discovered so far by NASA. There are approximately a trillion galaxies in the universe and within these galaxies, 100,000 planets could potentially host life, according to Oxford University. Now, I believe that if you think about the entire universe, I believe that we're not the only life in the universe.

• 41:36Speaker 02

  Yes, right.

• 41:37Steven Bartlett?

  I think that's, I mean.

• 41:38Speaker 02

  I think that's a very scientific conclusion.

• 41:40Steven Bartlett?

  Probabilistically, it would be pretty incredible if we were. I mean, it'd be just, it's almost inconceivable that we are. The question of whether that life has been here is a question that for me is still a big question mark. Because I just, you know, I also, I think Elon, you know, whatever you think about Elon, he is someone that seems to just say what he thinks. And this is part of what's caused his companies a lot of problems is he seems to be pretty unfiltered. He has been asked multiple times as well if he believes that they are, there are aliens in the, in, in our galaxy. And he has said on multiple occasions that he doesn't believe that to be the case. And, you know, he's launching rockets all the time. So he said, I heard him say, if anyone should know, it should be me. Do you think he knows?

• 42:20Speaker 00

  I think that you can't operate in space at, at, at the level he does or operate as a contractor at the level he does. Without having clearances that require secrecy. You know, there's, there's, there's all kinds of levels of secrecy. You know, everyone knows the word classified, right? There's classified projects, but there's also black projects that are on acknowledged special access programs, where you're literally by law required to not acknowledge the existence of the program or anything it does. That's literally the-

• 42:56Speaker 02

  Anything it knows.

• 42:57Speaker 00

  Yeah, that's literally the whole, they're literally referred to as unacknowledged special access programs.

• 43:02Steven Bartlett?

  That would mean all of his team as well, wouldn't it?

• 43:04Speaker 00

  So if you're involved with an unacknowledged special access program and someone asks you about it, you, you have to say you have no idea what they're talking about.

• 43:10Steven Bartlett?

  And all of his team.

• 43:12Speaker 00

  If, if they are a part of the program, yeah. But just because someone's read it on an unacknowledged special access program doesn't mean all their employees are.

• 43:22Steven Bartlett?

  Elon said that we have 9,000 satellites up there. He's referring to his company Starlink, and not once have we had to maneuver around an alien spaceship. He argues that if aliens were constantly visiting Earth, the aerospace experts who watch the skies every day would be the first to know.

• 43:37Speaker 00

  Well, look, NASA also has said for decades that they had no evidence of extraterrestrial life or UAPs. And last Friday, the federal government released a photo of a triangle craft hovering over the 1972 Apollo space mission. So somebody's, somebody's not being honest. You know, which also implies a lot of other people know things that they haven't revealed.

• 43:58Steven Bartlett?

  I think I've heard you say before, Hal, that you think this intelligent life actually exists amongst us. Yeah, the quote was, "They are not occasional visitors. They live secretly alongside humans, but with advanced technology."

• 44:11Speaker 02

  We have so many sightings and so many even access to materials and so on. I mean, they're all over the place.

• 44:20Steven Bartlett?

  65% of Americans believe intelligent life exists on other planets. 40% of people say military-reported UFOs are probably evidence of extraterrestrial life, according to Pew Research. And 30% of Americans believe UFOs or unidentified flying objects are probably alien ships of life form. And 47% of Americans believe aliens have definitely or probably visited Earth at some point, according to YouGov. Half of Americans believe that UFOs slash aliens have definitely or probably visited life at some point. Quite a lot of people.

• 44:53Speaker 02

  Well, you see, you see the Age of Disclosure film and the people that came forward. I mean, you had Clapper, ex-head of the Office of Director of National Intelligence, and Senator Rubio at the time, now in his elevated position and so on. You now have people of real quality, and you know they're not lying. And they're coming forth and saying, "This is real, and we got to deal with it." And there's a lot we don't know about it.

• 45:24Steven Bartlett?

  Could you be wrong?

• 45:26Speaker 00

  I don't think it's about whether I'm wrong or Hal's wrong. You'd have to believe that senior leadership across the government, the military, the intelligence community, that has access to classified information and is saying, "Based on the classified information they have seen, this is a real situation." You'd have to believe all of those people are lying for some bizarre, unexplained reason.

• 45:50Speaker 00

  So I find that hard to believe.

• 45:52Steven Bartlett?

  Could it be the case that all of those people were misinterpreting what they were seeing? They, they saw something, you know, fighter pilots saw something moving in their visors when they were up in machines.

• 46:04Speaker 00

  Not really, because-

• 46:05Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, in some cases, that could be the case, but then when you have actual materials, crash craft, bodies that aren't human.

• 46:14Speaker 00

  Also, a lot of these sightings, they're now in the process of, the White House, cabinet members are in the process of identifying where the evidence exists within federal agencies and the military, so they can get access to it themselves and then determine from there what can safely be shared with the public. I think, once they get their hands on more evidence, then a plan will be put in place for telling the world this conclusion. And I think we're, we're, it's like-

• 46:43Steven Bartlett?

  More close.

• 46:44Speaker 00

  Fate a complete, basically. Like, it's gonna get to that point relatively soon.

• 46:48Steven Bartlett?

  If we get to that point and you get personally invited in to wherever they're keeping these materials and you get to see every single file that exists, and as you go through those files, you realize that a lot of what you've been told is not true, because there's other explanations, how would it fundamentally change the way that you see the world?

• 47:07Speaker 00

  Some of, some of the UAP we've seen, like, take the famous, everybody knows, the Tic Tac UFO, right? That Commander Dave Fravor, the Navy fighter pilot, interacted with in 2004, right?

• 47:16Steven Bartlett?

  I'll put that on the screen for anyone that hasn't seen it.

• 47:18Speaker 00

  Great, and so take that, take that UAP, for example. Multiple data collection systems and Commander Dave Fravor, a legend in the Navy, Top Gun guy, commander of an entire naval strike group, right? Like, total badass, legend, legend of a guy. He sees this with his own eyes and a bunch of data collection systems capture data confirming it's real. This UAP went from hovering above the ocean to instantly being at 80,000 feet, which is the entrance to space, right? And it did that maneuver all afternoon. The amount of energy required to do that is so bonkers. It's, we do not, humans do, no human beings have the ability to create that must, that much energy, right?

• 48:03Speaker 00

  In a localized area for, for an aircraft. And, and so, to answer your question, if we find out, you know, the unthinkable, that this is not non-human intelligent life, that some humans have figured out how to crack that technology and did it as recent as 2004, when the Tic Tac incident happened, that would be even more mind-blowing than accepting that life from elsewhere is here and has been here a long time, because that would mean that some, some group of humans leapfrogged the rest of all of humanity technologically by thousands of years and then seemingly did nothing with that.

• 48:44Steven Bartlett?

  Or it could be something else. That's the nature of unusual things. They become great stories. So I, I think in the case of the Tic Tac incident, again, I'm, what I'm trying to do is interrogate this from all angles, is, could it have been something else?

• 48:57Speaker 00

  Look, any, any isolated event like that, you could do the whole, "Could it be this, could it be that thing?" But it's the, it's the, you gotta take a step back and look at this, the collective. It's one report like that after another from credible people since World War II. You know, during World War II, pilots were seeing what they called Foo Fighters, like, these orbs that would move alongside our fighter jets, right? Like, they would like, they would move in, in line with them.

• 49:25Speaker 02

  And now we have, we have people on ships seeing these things enter the water and then moving at, you know-

• 49:32Speaker 00

  Impossible speeds.

• 49:33Speaker 02

  450 knots or something, which no, no human being could do.

• 49:37Speaker 00

  As far as I know, our fastest submarines go like 50 miles an hour. These things are going hundreds of miles an hour under the ocean. So these craft are transmedium. They're seen in space, they're seen in the air, they're seen underwater. There's just too much activity to ignore it.

• 49:52Speaker 02

  Yeah, and that would be a hard one to say, "Well, you know, is there some sonar thing that makes you think something is doing that?" But it's seen enough times under enough different conditions that we just have to accept it as real.

• 50:04Steven Bartlett?

  Is there a reason why this hasn't been captured on like an iPhone? When, in 4K?

• 50:10Speaker 00

  There's been a lot of stuff captured on phones and video cameras. In, in that scene in the Age of Disclosure that I mentioned, where Hal and some of the other people break down how these things are working, and they describe that they're creating a warp bubble around the craft. That warp bubble also makes it very hard to get a clear video of something, because you're, you're taking a photo or a video through essentially a spacetime barrier, you know? It's like the equivalent of taking pictures of, trying to take video of like koi fish in a pond from above the water. It's gonna look all distorted because you're going through the water. If you're, if you're trying to video or take a photo through this bubble, it makes it pretty hard. And then you end up with the kind of videos we, we see.

• 50:49Steven Bartlett?

  You're probably familiar with this NASA report that they produced on UAPs, independent study team report, where they, they essentially say that they don't believe that this, these UAPs are, are aliens. Why would NASA be lying?

• 51:03Speaker 00

  Like, all these big bureaucracies, there's people who are aware of the truth, and then there's people who have the truth kept from them. Or, you know, one of the people I interviewed was Mike, Mike Gold, who was on the UAP, the NASA UAP task force. And he talked about how that effort was, was flawed from the start. They didn't want to have a result that said NASA has all this information that they've kept from the public. They wanted the result that they landed on, which is, "There's nothing to see here." And they were really discouraged from, for example, the, that, that image of a triangle, what clearly appears to be a triangle craft over the moon. They were told not to, not to include that in their report.

• 51:47Speaker 00

  Like, they were, they, they were not set up to tell the world the truth.

• 51:52Steven Bartlett?

  In your view, is it possible that aliens aren't, aren't real? Is it possible? Possible?

• 52:01Speaker 00

  I personally would pass at this point.

• 52:03Steven Bartlett?

  So you think it's impossible?

• 52:05Speaker 02

  Yeah, using the term alien, you know, has a certain connotation about it. So we can certainly say, I mean, the evidence is absolutely clear that there is some form of life with advanced technology. You know, if you wanna say, "Well, what can I prove about, about it?" Well, those are still unknowns that we're trying to suss out.

• 52:24Speaker 00

  I got access at a very high, to a very high level of the government, the military, and intelligence community. And there were a lot of people who talked to me off the record that wouldn't go on camera. There were a lot of people who couldn't tell me about classified information and want to know classified information. But they all made it very clear, not just on camera, but off the record, that there, that there is evidence at a classified level that is clear as day. Like, some video taken when, like, the bubble was turned off and you could see a craft of non-human origin, clear as day. And there is evidence of the technology that's been recovered and of these bodies. And when you have, if you put yourself in my shoes, when you have so many senior people across the military,

• 53:07Speaker 00

  government, and intelligence community telling you this, it's, it's really just impossible to ignore it. Especially when most of them aren't even friends. They're not like ideologically aligned or politically aligned. They're all just different groups of people.

• 53:18Steven Bartlett?

  I'm less compelled by eyewitnesses, this is the problem, because, you know, I'm such a big true crime fan. You hear about all the bloody cases where eyewitness said this, and then they find out the serial killer wasn't that person, or that thing didn't happen, so. And I also just have my own experiences of like thinking I saw things when I was younger.

• 53:33Speaker 00

  Here's an interesting thing you just made me think of. So, in the film, Rubio and General Jim Clapper, two people who are completely ideologically and politically opposed to each other, made the same really intelligent point. And they both have knowledge at a classified level of this situation. They both said, "A problem we, as humans, have is that there's something in the human psyche that says, 'I cannot wrap my head around or prepare for things I haven't seen or experienced.'" Right? And time and time again throughout history, that has proven to be like a human flaw, right?

• 54:12Speaker 00

  Rubio goes on to say that the greatest intelligence failures in US history come from a lack of imagination. And he cites a few examples. He says, "We never would have imagined the Japanese could figure out how to get torpedoes through the straits and hit us at Pearl Harbor, until they did." He says, "We never would have imagined terrorists would fly to the homeland, learn to fly commercial planes, and then use them in a terrorist act, until they did." Right? He says some other examples, too. But time and time again, not wrapping our head around a set of circumstances that, in using our imagination to think about what might happen or what might be happening, has, it's bit us in the ass.

• 54:51Speaker 00

  And he, he ends his line of thought by saying, "Lack of imagination leads to strategic surprise, like Pearl Harbor, like 9/11." And sometimes strategic surprise changes the course of history. And so, you know, him and, and other people I interviewed think it's really important to get ahead of this, as opposed to waiting for something to happen. As opposed to waiting for, you know, to find out the hard way that China, you know, cracked this technology before us and used it as, in an act of war. Or, non-human intelligent life does something unpredictable, and then all of a sudden, the US government's on its heels, and so are other governments on their heels, explaining to the public what they've known for a long time.

• 55:29Steven Bartlett?

  I've often heard that the reason why they don't tell the general public that these things exist is because the general public aren't ready for this information.

• 55:38Steven Bartlett?

  Is that an argument? I've not really heard you guys say that.

• 55:40Speaker 00

  Yeah, no, people, there are people involved in gatekeeping this information that don't think the public can handle the truth. You know, Hal recently told me that people in the Legacy Program are pointing to the Age of Disclosure and saying, "Look, this film reveals a lot, and people aren't losing their shit, you know? People aren't jumping out of windows, it's not causing chaos in society." Like, the public can handle the base facts.

• 56:02Steven Bartlett?

  Of all the things you've heard, Dan, what is the, what was the most compelling story or anecdote that you heard that convinced you?

• 56:09Speaker 00

  It was really just the sheer number of very high-level military, government, and intelligence officials who were telling me in, in private settings to my face, you know, that at a classified level, they know with absolute certainty this is real.

• 56:24Steven Bartlett?

  But if you had to pick one story?

• 56:26Speaker 00

  Oh, I mean, it's really, it's really, it wasn't one, it really wasn't one thing for me. It was like, it was the overall. It's like, for example, I, I interviewed Rubio and Senator Gillibrand on the same day. They both participated in the film and did lengthy interviews with me. And both looked me in the face and told me they thought this was the most important documentary that's ever been made. And that this was really important to bring this information out in a thoughtful way to the public and make them aware of what's happening. You, you can't like on-hear stuff like that, you know? And it makes, it makes an impact on you.

• 56:57Steven Bartlett?

  What about you, Hal? What was the most persuasive thing that you, that tipped you over the edge from a, you know, maybe being agnostic to believing that there are non-human intelligent life amongst us?

• 57:09Speaker 02

  Well, it's looking at the technology, which is so advanced, then I'm essentially certain that no us or our adversaries could have made it. So somebody actually made it, and it has to be somebody who knows a lot more about physics than we do. I mean, there's, there's nowhere to go but say, "Okay, there's somebody who is way beyond humans to develop that kind of technology and display it."

• 57:40Steven Bartlett?

  Of all the evidence that's been released, and all of the rumors and videos and, you know, going back to the crop fields that we used to hear about many years ago, presumably there's lots of this stuff that you don't believe, that you think is nonsense.

• 57:52Speaker 00

  Oh, there's definitely, there's definitely-

• 57:53Speaker 02

  Oh, yeah, tons of that.

• 57:54Speaker 00

  There's tons of reports that are, that, when you look into them, seem like bullshit, for sure.

• 58:00Steven Bartlett?

  Because, you know, one of the things people often say is that alien encounter descriptions perfectly match the pop culture of their era. So people saw flying saucers in the, in the 1950s, after sci-fi movies popularized them, and gray aliens in the 1980s after books like Communion popularized them. And this kind of suggests that sightings are born from human imagination versus-

• 58:22Speaker 02

  Well, I, I think, and I think that's a reasonable place to come to. I think, I think a lot of the reports that we get, you know, we can generally set aside as being, you know, just manufactured by humans who get caught up in this sort of a give and take on social media and so on. But nonetheless, when you really zero in on actual evidence of technologies and evidence of bodies, there you can't just say it's, you know, it's just social contagion.

• 58:54Steven Bartlett?

  When I think about the technologies, when I watched like the Tic Tac video, it's kind of blurry and I don't really know what I'm looking at. Like, there's this thing moving around on the screen that's like black and white, but I don't really know what I'm looking at. And I think this has always been the struggle with it, is we're so used to consuming content in high-definition that we can clearly, and it appears to be the case that so many of these UAP videos are like in the distance and kind of blurry and vague. So it makes them harder to believe. And it just, I think we're all longing for like a solid video. You talked about them going in and out of the water. How come someone's not got, you got, if someone like falls over and we, we capture it all on camera these days, CCTV cameras on every high street, why is there not like a solid video of something going in the water and out of the water?

• 59:38Speaker 00

  Look, multiple people said on, on camera that they have seen with their own eyes classified videos that are indisputable. And some of them told me specifics, like that story I told you, the first video Jay Stratton was shown when he went down this rabbit hole, was a triangle craft hovering over a nuclear weapons site. Air Force security guards had filmed it on a little VHS camera that they had. It was, it was hovering long enough for them to do that. You know, that kind of evidence exists, but it's just still classified.

• 1:00:05Steven Bartlett?

  Will it be coming out, do you think?

• 1:00:06Speaker 00

  I, I, I hope so. I, I know this process is playing out right now, where people like, like Jay Stratton are helping the administration find where the evidence exists, so they can get their hands on it and then determine whether it can safely be declassified. Like, that process is definitely playing out right now.

• 1:00:22Steven Bartlett?

  Do you think, do you trust the Trump administration to release all of the available information?

• 1:00:27Speaker 00

  I, I don't think it's a question of, "Do we trust the current administration will release it?" It's, "Do we think all these federal agencies and branches of military are gonna turn over the evidence they have to the administration?" That's the question. And the jury's still out on that. They're, they're not right now. They're pushing back, and they're pushing back hard. And that's why the administration is working with people like Stratton, like Jay Stratton, who, who had, who over 16 years has learned where a lot of this evidence is. They're working with people like him to find out where the evidence sits, who, who's gatekeeping it at each of these different organizations, and how to get to it. So they're doing, they're doing a fact-finding mission right now.

• 1:01:12Speaker 09

  Whoa, what's that on your face?

• 1:01:14Steven Bartlett?

  This is my Bon Charge face mask. I've been wearing this for some time now. They're a sponsor of the podcast. I put this on for 15, 20 minutes a day. I can sit here in the chair and wear it, boost my collagen production, helps with fine line blemishes, my complexion gets better, and then more people listen to the podcast because I look better. Professional-grade equipment in such a small box, it's non-invasive, and having sat here with so many of the world's leading health professionals, there's various things that I repeatedly hear work and some things I'm a bit skeptical about. This is one of the things that almost all of my guests on this show have confirmed works. It is really, really, really effective. And they offer fast, free shipping worldwide with easy returns and exchanges, and you'll also get a one-year warranty on all of their products. And they're HSA and FSA eligible, giving you tax-free savings up to 40%.

• 1:01:59Steven Bartlett?

  And you can get 20% off when you order through my link at boncharge.com/DOAC. That's boncharge.com/DOAC. The deal applies site-wide. If it is released, if all the information that you've heard from your witnesses is released, if they release, you know, craft, alien craft, and they release alien bodies and all of these things, how do you imagine the world would be different?

• 1:02:24Speaker 00

  I think it will lead to a giant technology boom. I think once we're told, hey, there's this technology that exists that could revolutionize the way we live, you know, it could lead to anti-gravity technology, it could lead to

• 1:02:38Speaker 02

  New energy sources.

• 1:02:40Speaker 00

  New energy sources, solve the energy crisis overnight, right? Could lead to interstellar travel and going farther out, you know?

• 1:02:47Speaker 02

  And I think it would have a great psychological effect because, you know, if suddenly you go from the point of saying, well, maybe we're the only intelligent species in the universe, and then you suddenly get the idea that this is a universe full of life.

• 1:03:02Steven Bartlett?

  What does that mean for religion?

• 1:03:04Speaker 00

  I think all dogmas will just apply to it, you know? And I think the Vatican's already gotten ahead of it and said, you know, they put out a message a couple of years ago that basically the gist of it was, you know, God's universe and God's work is vast and, you know, like basically-

• 1:03:19Speaker 02

  You couldn't, you couldn't, you know, say that he wouldn't have the ability to do that, I mean.

• 1:03:26Speaker 00

  So I-

• 1:03:27Speaker 02

  So in fact, from a religious standpoint, and certainly in the case of the Catholic Church, they've had very positive views about population being throughout the universe.

• 1:03:38Speaker 00

  And there's nothing really, at least from the Catholic Church's perspective, there's nothing that counters the, you know, that doesn't allow you to wrap your head around the fact that there's other life out there, you know?

• 1:03:48Steven Bartlett?

  Are you guys religious?

• 1:03:50Speaker 00

  Not like overly religious, but like, you know, my mom's Irish and grew up going to Catholic school and I, you know, I went to CCD, you know, Sunday School, it's called a CCD where I grew up, but-

• 1:04:02Steven Bartlett?

  Do you believe in God?

• 1:04:03Speaker 00

  I do, I do.

• 1:04:04Steven Bartlett?

  Do you believe in God?

• 1:04:05Speaker 02

  I do, yeah, and I'm a practicing Catholic, so.

• 1:04:07Steven Bartlett?

  So would that mean that you believe God has made all of these aliens as well?

• 1:04:12Speaker 00

  That's my, that's what my worldview is.

• 1:04:13Speaker 02

  Yeah, I would think that I couldn't say that's not the case. But, you know, as a scientist, I can't prove that it is the case, but, you know, just on the statistics of it, it's pretty likely.

• 1:04:26Speaker 00

  You know, an interesting thing happening right now, Stephen, too, is these people who have been gatekeeping the truth, a lot of them are afraid to come forward and tell the White House what they know because they think they're going to be villainized. They think the optics around this are such that like, if someone's been covering this up, they're the villain of the story, right? And so the White House and the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of War realize this, and so in the last couple of weeks, they've been messaging out to the military and the intelligence community that this is not a witch hunt, it's not an endeavor to punish anyone. They want to encourage people to come forward, assure them there will be no punishment for

• 1:05:10Speaker 00

  being involved in gatekeeping this, they just want to learn the truth and find out where the real evidence sits. So that's another thing that's playing out right now, that I think if it gets out there enough, it will lead to more people coming forward with that evidence we all want to see.

• 1:05:26Steven Bartlett?

  Earlier on, you talked about how some people feel like their lives are at risk because of what they know. Has there been any instance of anyone being punished for saying anything in this regard?

• 1:05:37Speaker 02

  Well, certainly having their clearances pulled or losing their opportunities for advancement, we've heard stories like that from several people in the intelligence.

• 1:05:49Steven Bartlett?

  Is there, is there anyone you can name that has said that they were threatened or punished or in some form because of what they-

• 1:05:57Speaker 02

  Well, certainly the number one whistleblower for many people has been David Grush. And so he has outlined the various steps taken against him to basically ruin his career significantly enough that he went to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community and said, I'm being punished, shoved aside, losing clearances and so on, because I came out with this data. And they said, well, what you've provided us is, you know, serious, worthy of consideration.

• 1:06:29Speaker 00

  And I think a lot of people have had their lives threatened. I'm not certain if anyone has been killed, but I know people have had their lives threatened.

• 1:06:39Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:06:40Steven Bartlett?

  And who's threatening them?

• 1:06:42Speaker 00

  People that are involved in this program, referred to as the Legacy Program.

• 1:06:49Speaker 02

  Who think that the evidence should not ever come out.

• 1:06:53Steven Bartlett?

  This Legacy Program, so this is a program ran within the US government?

• 1:06:59Speaker 02

  US government, elements of it, and also defense contractors.

• 1:07:05Steven Bartlett?

  And you think the Legacy Program knows the truth in this regard?

• 1:07:10Speaker 02

  Yes, because they have the firsthand evidence of the crash materials and the bodies.

• 1:07:17Speaker 00

  There's 80 years of data that this, this group has.

• 1:07:23Steven Bartlett?

  And they haven't released or leaked that data for the last 80 years?

• 1:07:28Speaker 00

  There'd be no advantage.

• 1:07:29Steven Bartlett?

  No one's hacked it?

• 1:07:30Speaker 00

  This, this program is the epitome of a special access program. I think this program is as off the grid as it could possibly be.

• 1:07:38Steven Bartlett?

  It almost seems like there's nothing that eventually hasn't come to, come to light that the government have done. Like, I've sat here and interviewed a lot of CIA spies who've told me the history of the CIA and this program that lasted for 12 years, and then it comes out, and this program, and, I mean, even some of the stuff that I've heard you talk about how around, what's it called?

• 1:07:56Speaker 00

  Remote viewing.

• 1:07:56Steven Bartlett?

  Remote viewing. That was that CIA project.

• 1:07:59Speaker 02

  That was CIA.

• 1:08:00Steven Bartlett?

  What is remote viewing?

• 1:08:02Speaker 02

  Remote viewing, well, the CIA suddenly got concerned because they saw that the Soviets were spending millions of dollars at some of their best institutes to investigate the possible use of, quote, ESP.

• 1:08:15Steven Bartlett?

  What's ESP?

• 1:08:15Speaker 00

  Psychic ability.

• 1:08:16Speaker 02

  Yeah, psychic abilities, extrasensory perception. And so, as it turns out, I was at Stanford Research Institute and they saw my background. They came to me and said, you know, we'd like for you to look into this, is there anything to this? I mean, no scientist in America even believes there is such a thing as ESP.

• 1:08:37Steven Bartlett?

  Who came to you?

• 1:08:38Speaker 02

  CIA.

• 1:08:39Speaker 00

  This is in the 70s.

• 1:08:40Speaker 02

  It's back in the 70s.

• 1:08:42Steven Bartlett?

  The CIA approached you in the 70s and asked you to investigate remote viewing?

• 1:08:45Speaker 02

  That's right. And so they asked me to set up a small program and 50 or 60K or whatever, and they said, you know, we hope you'll find this is all nonsense, we can forget about it, we don't have to worry about it. And it grew into, you know, more than a two-decade program, millions of dollars. Stargate is the label for it that most people know about because by now, most of the information in the program came out. And basically, we just, we just found that people essentially, just like you have artistic ability or athletic ability or whatever, musical ability, well, we found out that remote viewing, this ability to sit in a location and pick up information from someplace

• 1:09:30Speaker 02

  far away, is a talent that many people could demonstrate. And so we ended up actually training Army Intelligence Officers at the Army Intelligence and Security Command at Fort Meade how to do this, and so-

• 1:09:46Steven Bartlett?

  So wait, let me just simplify this for the audience that might not fully understand what we're talking about. So remote viewing is the idea that I could sit here in London where we are now, and I could be trained to see what was going on in another part of the world?

• 1:09:59Speaker 00

  To make your mind's eye go to a remote location.

• 1:10:02Speaker 02

  I'll give you a specific example. A Soviet plane that CIA wanted to get hold of went down somewhere in Africa. They didn't, they didn't know where because the pilot had bailed out and it just went on until it ran out of gas. So we got two of our, quote, best remote viewers, one that worked for the Air Force and one that worked for my organization, to say, okay, here's a map of Africa, where's that damn plane? We gotta go in and get it. And they put an X on the map that was in three miles of where the plane went down out of the hundreds of thousands of square miles. And so the CIA went in and got the plane. So I mean, it was, you know, how do they do that?

• 1:10:42Speaker 00

  By the way, there's an audio recording of President Jimmy Carter telling that story.

• 1:10:45Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:10:47Speaker 00

  Post-presidency.

• 1:10:49Steven Bartlett?

  Maybe we should play that.

• 1:10:51Speaker 03

  One time we had a, a small plane go down somewhere in Africa. We were not able to find it by surveillance from our satellites. So the Director of the CIA, he was also Director of all the intelligence agencies, heard about a woman in California that was a medium. And he contacted her and she gave him the latitude and longitude of the plane's whereabouts. And the next time one of our space satellites went over that area, we located the plane where she said it was.

• 1:11:31Steven Bartlett?

  Again, this sounds like it's impossible.

• 1:11:34Speaker 02

  Sounds like it, I agree.

• 1:11:35Speaker 00

  It sounds completely bananas. It sounds like something out of an X-Men comic book. It sounds crazy, but-

• 1:11:41Speaker 02

  Well, I was, okay, if you want to be really practical about it, you know, they, often our skeptics would say, well, if they're so psychic, why aren't they rich, why aren't they in the stock market or whatever? So we set up a little program, a challenge, to predict silver futures.

• 1:11:58Steven Bartlett?

  To predict what?

• 1:11:59Speaker 02

  Silver futures.

• 1:12:00Speaker 00

  Just the value of silver.

• 1:12:01Speaker 02

  Yeah, the value of silver, silver on a daily basis, was it going to go up or go down? So we had somebody said, okay, I will, if you'll set up a little program like that for 30 days, I'll bet on what your, quote, remote viewers say, and I'll put the money in and I'll give you 10% of what I make. I said, okay, fine. Now, long story short, made $260,000 in the 30 days. We got our 10%, which is $26,000. So people could actually, in this case, even look into the future a day and generate a description of what they were going to see and handle the following day.

• 1:12:42Steven Bartlett?

  Presumably not everybody. How many people did you have do that experiment?

• 1:12:46Speaker 02

  We had seven in that experiment.

• 1:12:49Steven Bartlett?

  And how many of them were successful in generating?

• 1:12:50Speaker 02

  Six of the seven generated really good data.

• 1:12:54Steven Bartlett?

  So are those six of people now rich?

• 1:12:58Speaker 02

  Well, I don't know, some of them may, may have followed up.

• 1:13:02Steven Bartlett?

  Why were those six people picked?

• 1:13:04Speaker 02

  Since we had learned that sort of anybody can do this, we were actually raising money for a school that was being put together. So I just went to the Board of Directors and said, okay, I'm going to give you a crash course over the weekend in, quote, remote viewing of the type we train intelligence officers to do, and so you're going to be it.

• 1:13:27Steven Bartlett?

  So you just, it was the board of the school?

• 1:13:29Speaker 02

  Yeah, the board, the board of the school.

• 1:13:31Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 1:13:32Speaker 02

  They all knew what I did for a living, and so-

• 1:13:34Speaker 00

  This program, Stargate, got so much actionable intelligence from the remote viewers that Hal started briefing at the time, the Director of the CIA on a regular basis.

• 1:13:44Speaker 02

  Yeah, I briefed all the way up to Bill Casey, the Director of the CIA.

• 1:13:48Steven Bartlett?

  So does it still exist, this program, in any capacity, remote viewing?

• 1:13:52Speaker 02

  If it does, you wouldn't hear about it.

• 1:13:55Steven Bartlett?

  Why?

• 1:13:56Speaker 02

  Because it'd be a black, highly classified program.

• 1:14:01Steven Bartlett?

  Why?

• 1:14:02Speaker 02

  Because we don't want our adversaries to know how we might be getting access to their data.

• 1:14:07Steven Bartlett?

  You just told us.

• 1:14:09Speaker 02

  But people can not believe that, and that's fine.

• 1:14:11Steven Bartlett?

  But aren't you under some sort of contract?

• 1:14:14Speaker 02

  Well, as it turns out, the CIA and DIA, also went to the DIA, that program finally got declassified at the level that was operating at, and that you can go to the CIA reading room and you can get all the documents on it.

• 1:14:29Steven Bartlett?

  So your work was originally classified?

• 1:14:31Speaker 02

  Oh, it was originally a top-secret, special access program, yeah.

• 1:14:37Steven Bartlett?

  There's a part of me that goes, listen, if people could do remote viewing and see, you know, into other parts of the world or predict the things that you're saying, I mean, if it was trainable, everything, so the, like, life as we know it would be completely flipped on its head.

• 1:14:55Speaker 00

  I think it's unreasonable to think that when Stargate became public, the US government stopped remote viewing.

• 1:15:04Steven Bartlett?

  I mean, I wouldn't stop if I was the US government. If it worked, I wouldn't stop.

• 1:15:07Speaker 00

  I think it just went underground, moved to a different agency.

• 1:15:10Speaker 02

  Went underground.

• 1:15:11Steven Bartlett?

  So you were training people to do it, though?

• 1:15:14Speaker 02

  Yeah, we, well, we had, yeah, we had, we had people that we trained.

• 1:15:17Steven Bartlett?

  So train me?

• 1:15:20Steven Bartlett?

  How do you train?

• 1:15:21Speaker 02

  Now, a number of the military intelligence officers that we trained have now left the military and they do have training courses.

• 1:15:31Steven Bartlett?

  Do you believe it?

• 1:15:32Speaker 00

  I do. At first, I thought it just sounded too much like something in a comic book, right? But the more I first read about Stargate and the declassified documents, started to realize how serious the government took it, and the more I learned about it through Hal, and then eventually, I really don't want to get into the details of this, but eventually I got connected with someone who has done remote viewing for the government, and they did a demonstration for me that blew my mind.

• 1:16:00Steven Bartlett?

  Because you would think if anyone was capable of doing remote viewing, they could go on the internet and make one prediction or do one video that would be, you know, proven to be true, and they would literally be considered to be a superhuman. Like, they would literally be, I mean, people would probably think they were a deity or a spiritual leader or something. If one person could do it on this-

• 1:16:23Speaker 02

  What we found was that it seems to be an action that is just part of the human makeup. And so it isn't like they're a super deity or a god-like or really off the charts. It's something that people can learn to do, like they can learn to play the piano or whatever, for whatever reason.

• 1:16:42Speaker 00

  Maybe it was a skill set a long time ago.

• 1:16:44Speaker 02

  Now we have new, you know, psychiatrists and neurophysiologists beginning to study, you know, how does consciousness do its thing in the brain and so on? Are there elements of it, once you get into quantum theory and quantum entanglement, that would say you could have evidence, you know, beyond just our physical structures?

• 1:17:05Speaker 00

  Like, it could be rationalized with like a quantum connection, basically, the moving your mind's eye to another location, which also goes to like, you know, Hal's life, very interestingly, you know, first was the Stargate stuff, and then he got into UAP, and the overlap that I find fascinating is some of these craft that have been found or crashes that have happened. The reports from people involved say that a lot of them don't have any control panels in them, like, they're basically empty other than seats, which suggests that maybe there's some sort of mind connection controlling these craft.

• 1:17:41Steven Bartlett?

  I did wonder about the crafts. I thought, you know, if I was in advanced civilization, why would I, and I was that smart, why would I send life to these planets when I could just send the crafts? You know, why am I sending biological life when I could just send the-

• 1:17:53Speaker 00

  Maybe they're manufactured biological life, maybe it's, maybe they're equivalent, maybe they're not sentient, yeah?

• 1:17:59Steven Bartlett?

  That's true.

• 1:18:00Speaker 00

  But the remote viewing stuff opens up a lot of possibilities if-

• 1:18:04Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, we, as part of this CIA program, we found that people could affect quantum devices that were totally shielded by superconducting shielding and everything else.

• 1:18:17Speaker 00

  Tell them that particular story, that's-

• 1:18:18Speaker 02

  Yeah, we, there was a, quote, psychic, so-called, and so I brought him to Stanford, and I was skeptical at the time, and I said, okay, well, we've got this super experiment where there's a tiny quantum chip down inside of this electrical shielding, magnetic shielding, superconducting shielding, we want to see if you can affect it.

• 1:18:44Speaker 02

  And he did. I mean, this is supposed to be totally non-effectible from, by anything on the outside. In fact, it was developed by the Navy to just look for quarks and stuff like that. And so it was supposed to not be influenced from the outside by anything, and he influenced it. And when I say he influenced it, I'm not just saying there's a little blip that, you know, you can kind of read into it. No, it was a system where it ordinarily just had an oscillating signal like that, and then when he affected it, it just stopped the oscillation. And then he also make the oscillation go twice as fast. Of course, poor graduate student whose life depended on this not being affected from the outside, you know, really.

• 1:19:29Speaker 02

  But then they, that raised a big issue for them. That means, gee, does that mean if we put, if we hide our documents inside of superconducting safes, the Russians might be able to... So actually, when we had detente, the American remote viewers got together with the Soviet remote viewers and traded war stories, did experiments together for-

• 1:19:52Steven Bartlett?

  You know, I'm, I think I'm naturally skeptical because I'm skeptical with all things, but I'm often proven wrong. So, you know, my fiance, she, she believes lots of things I don't believe, and so frequently she's been proven right in those things, that I remain open-minded to things in life because I've learnt to. So I think that's where I remain, I remain open-minded. And I think on the balance of probability, if you ask me, do I think there's other life in the universe? I think it would be crazy to say there wasn't.

• 1:20:21Speaker 02

  Right, right.

• 1:20:22Steven Bartlett?

  But has there been life that has arrived here that we've recovered? I just, I would need more evidence. Is there any-

• 1:20:29Speaker 02

  I think, I think that's the right attitude, and we're hoping that with the release of documents, it's starting to happen now, that you'll get that evidence. But in the absence of actually getting access to the evidence, it's very reasonable to be skeptical.

• 1:20:47Speaker 00

  Yeah, I do think, though, that the current administration in the US is so focused on following through with this directive the President gave to, to get all the evidence within the possession of the federal government, all the different agencies, the military branches, and then figure out what can be declassified. I think they're taking it so serious that we're gonna, we're gonna get to more tranches of more meaningful evidence, and I think eventually we'll get to that thing that we, that moment that we've all only seen in movies, where a sitting President steps to a microphone and tells the world we're not alone in the universe. I think, I think we're gonna get there.

• 1:21:19Speaker 02

  I think so, too.

• 1:21:23Speaker 00

  Just a matter of time.

• 1:21:24Steven Bartlett?

  Does it change the meaning of life if that becomes the case? Does it, does it mean anything for us as humans? What do you think the meaning of life is, Hal? And do you think we should change our behavior in any way, even if this moment does occur?

• 1:21:36Speaker 02

  I think if we found out that there were life throughout the universe, that it's, it can be developed in all kinds of forms, then, then that makes us take a new look at, well, what does it mean to be human? You know, we ought to think about, if we can, interacting with these other species and seeing what we can learn from them and what might they learn from us? And so it just opens up a whole new sort of view of what the universe is like. I mean, I've got, I've got 15 grandkids, they should grow up in a universe where it's teeming with life and they know that, and that's a very, kind of an exciting kind of thing.

• 1:22:16Speaker 00

  I think it also could be the one thing that could unify all of humanity. You know, Reagan gave a great speech during his presidency at the United Nations where he said he often thinks that it might be a threat from outside this universe that makes all of humanity come together and think more about what it has in common than, than its differences, and, you know, moves them past the, the conflicts of the moment. And that might be, you know, wishful thinking and might be naive, but it also might actually be the one thing that could, that could line people up.

• 1:22:49Steven Bartlett?

  Has it changed how you think about the, the meaning of life?

• 1:22:52Speaker 00

  Between what I've learned about the, the reality of the UAP situation and the existence of non-human intelligent life, and what I've learned about, for example, remote viewing, it's made me realize that our sort of Western, present-day view of reality is not complete, you know? We think we know everything there is, you know, to life and how things work, and we just don't. And when you're honest with yourself and you look back at history, all the times people thought that, they were, they were proven wrong pretty quickly. And so it's made me open to a lot more possibilities than, than I would have been just, just 10 years ago.

• 1:23:30Speaker 02

  I think it'd be a renaissance in our attitudes toward life and everything, yeah.

• 1:23:35Steven Bartlett?

  Are you both open to being wrong?

• 1:23:38Speaker 00

  Yeah, look, I should have said this earlier on. When I first started making my documentary, I was totally prepared to have people tell me, look, this is all bullshit, it was all cover for our classified projects.

• 1:23:50Steven Bartlett?

  Did they?

• 1:23:51Speaker 00

  No, no one did. That was the crazy thing, not, not a single person did. I would, I was trying to pull it out of people. I'd be like, you know, come on, this is really, this is like a black project and unacknowledged special access program, right? Like, just, just say nothing if that's the case. And they're like, no, dude, not, not even close. Like, it was over and over, and these weren't random people, these were like senior people on the Senate Intelligence Committee, on the Senate Armed Services Committee, leaders in, in the intelligence community, leaders in, in the military. And so, yeah, it's hard to ignore.

• 1:24:24Steven Bartlett?

  Well, Trump has released the first round of the UAP reports, so I guess in many respects, this conversation is to be continued.

• 1:24:33Speaker 00

  Yeah, yeah. And we, we have been told by our friends in government that the next tranche of evidence is likely to come out in the next 30 days or so, and it's going to be a rolling declassification process. So there'll be a lot more to talk about in the near future.

• 1:24:46Steven Bartlett?

  Thank you so much for your time, really appreciate it. I feel very curious, very, very curious, and I highly recommend people go check out your documentary, I'm going to link it below. And I think one of the great things about the documentary is the diversity of people you've spoken to, including Marco Rubio, who is now working alongside President Trump and many others, including yourself, Hal, and other guests that I've, people like Jay, who I hope to speak to sometime soon.

• 1:25:09Speaker 00

  Cool. Thank you for having us, and thank you for bringing attention to interesting topics like this. I really do think, you know, you know, people like you are helping open people's minds. You know, in the past, you only had, you know, it wasn't that long ago, there's only four TV networks, right? And a small group of legacy media people controlled what people thought about, really. So people here are opening up everyone's minds to other possibilities and other information, and so, thank you.

• 1:25:32Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah, it's, it's interesting because, again, sometimes I think I have to remind the audience of like why I do what I do and why I pick the subjects that I pick, but it's honestly just what I'm curious about. And if, if something rises in public curiosity and it's in my curiosity, then I'll speak about it. It's not an endorsement of me believing everything, it is just me wanting to learn more. And I, you know, I, I wish we lived in a society that was more open-minded generally to the people on the other side of the aisle or to subjects that are currently considered to be, I don't know, controversial or, or not. Because, you know, it's not lost on me that my own very existence as a black businessman is in of itself something that was once a very controversial idea.

• 1:26:15Steven Bartlett?

  And so I'm all for, you know, controversial ideas being, having some kind of space to be-

• 1:26:22Speaker 00

  Well, every major breakthrough in the history of humanity came from someone being curious, right? And wanting to learn about something they weren't aware of. So I, I think great things will come out of it, and, and you just touched on something that we didn't mention, which is, I found, shockingly, that this is the, the UAP issue, non-human intelligent life, is the most bipartisan issue in Washington DC. At a time when Democrats and Republicans in the United States can't agree on anything, they're completely lined up on this being the biggest issue of our time, extremely significant, and like, that says a lot, too, you know?

• 1:26:54Steven Bartlett?

  To be continued.

• 1:26:55Speaker 00

  To be continued.