Pod Insights Endless Thread Socials for Sale About this episode Most of us know the internet isn't a particularly private place. Yet there's a certain feeling of anonymity that comes with sharing online — our words and stories mixed in with millions of others. It's easy to think no one is watching.
But your data isn't just vulnerable to prying eyes. It's for sale. And the government is buying it up to keep a closer eye on you — and all of us.
This week, hosts Amory and Ben take a chilling look at how our social media is used for surveillance with Dell Cameron, an investigative reporter with WIRED covering privacy and national security.
ICE Wants to Build Out a 24/7 Social Media Surveillance Team https://www.wired.com/story/ice-social-media-surveillance-24-7-contract/ (WIRED)
Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technology/dhs-anti-ice-social-media.html (The New York Times)
ICE has spun a massive surveillance web. We talked to people caught in it https://www.npr.org/2026/03/04/nx-s1-5717031/ice-dhs-immigrants-surveillance-confrontation-deportation-mobile-fortify (NPR)
To reach Endless Thread on Signal: 646-456-9095
This episode was written and produced by Kalyani Saxena and co-hosted by Ben Brock Johnson and Amory Sivertson. It was edited by Dave Shaw and Meg Cramer. Mix and sound design by Marquis Neal
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 Speaker 00 Support for this podcast comes from Is Business Broken?, a podcast from the Marotra Institute at BU Questram School of Business. A recent episode explores how AI is reshaping our schools. Stick around until the end of this podcast to preview the episode.
0:17 Amory Sivertson? Support for Endless Thread comes from MathWorks, creator of MATLAB and Simulink software to design and develop engineered systems, accelerating the pace of discovery in engineering and science. Learn more at mathworks.com.
0:33 Speaker 02 Parenting unlocks some pretty impressive skills, like carrying grocery bags, a soccer ball, and a sleepy kid all at once. Good thing the newly designed Chrysler Pacifica has a few tricks of its own: hands-free power sliding doors and liftgate, rear-seat entertainment, and stow-and-go seating and storage that adapts faster than your family's weekend plans. Visit Chrysler.com to learn more. Chrysler is a registered trademark of FCAUS LLC.
1:03 Speaker 02 WBUR Podcasts, Boston.
1:14 Amory Sivertson? It was like something out of a spy thriller. An intrepid reporter got his hands on a government file.
1:21 Ben Brock Johnson? You might be picturing vanilla, manila folder, classified, splashed across in a red stamp, all caps.
1:29 Amory Sivertson? And you probably wouldn't be far off. The file did look particularly Hollywood-esque, at least to the reporter who saw it.
1:37 Speaker 04 It has like the person's name and residency and occupation. It's just, it's done up in a way that makes it seem like this person is a criminal and like they are gathering, you know, tons of intelligence on them.
1:52 Ben Brock Johnson? That's Dell Cameron. He's an investigative reporter with Wired, covering privacy and national security. And he's telling us about the time he got his eyes on a document out of Washington State.
2:04 Amory Sivertson? The document was created ahead of a No Kings rally there last year.
2:09 Speaker 04 This included something that they called, quote unquote, "a threat escalator" section. And it was built entirely around a single person who was a Harvard grad student living in Seattle. The document is sourced entirely to a TikTok video that she posted in the days before the event. And she's focused on kind of warning her viewers, you know, her audience about impending ICE raids in the Yakima Valley. And she's saying ICE, these ICE agents are domestic terrorists and should be dealt with like domestic terrorists.
2:50 Speaker 04 So that intrigued the police and they circulated a document to at least, you know, dozens of officers, probably hundreds in the area.
3:01 Amory Sivertson? Dell got this particular file from Property of the People, a nonprofit dedicated to government transparency. It's what's known in law enforcement circles as a threat bulletin, and it had a lot of personal information about this Harvard graduate student.
3:17 Speaker 04 That page that they circulated, you know, included her name, her social media handle, where they believe she lived, you know, occupation, they lifted photographs of her from social media and from the video. And then interestingly, it kind of, it just characterizes her speech as spreading extremist ideology, attempting a call to action against a government entity and invoking fear and panic. And then it also, you know, it ultimately conceives that this person is not even likely to attend the protest itself.
3:55 Ben Brock Johnson? And there was something else noteworthy about the file.
4:00 Speaker 04 The word threat is misspelled on this document. It's, it looks like someone attempted to put this thing together to make it look really professional, but in the end failed, you know, to some degree.
4:12 Amory Sivertson? Dell told us it's not unusual for the quality of these threat bulletins to be quite poor. The information in them mined almost exclusively from social media can also be flimsy. Still, they're circulated to officials and the consequences of ending up in a document like this can be pretty severe.
4:33 Speaker 04 It could put you on the federal government's radar, or it could put you on the radar of your local police department. That is something that could potentially affect you if they. Add a little flag next to your name in some database or something. Maybe you get pulled over for a traffic stop and you you may not realize what's going on, but the officer is, you know, not treating you very well.
4:57 Ben Brock Johnson? So when Dell saw this dossier like document about a private citizen built on a single social media post, it sent a tingle up his spine.
5:07 Speaker 04 That was probably the most insane instance of something like that I'd seen.
5:14 Ben Brock Johnson? Dell has seen some pretty insane things on his feed. As a reporter, he spends a lot of time parsing out the ways the government is watching us and gobbling up our social media data.
5:25 Amory Sivertson? Most of us know that nothing we say online is really private. Still, the internet is a big place. There are millions of posts every day across TikTok, X, Facebook, Blue Sky, Threads, et cetera, et cetera. It's easy to feel like no one's really watching you specifically, unless you have a habit of going viral, of course.
5:46 Ben Brock Johnson? Most of us do not, right? Right? We're just yelling into the social media void? Well, Dell has some bad news for us.
5:57 Speaker 04 I don't want to tell anyone not to be on social media, but if you're using social media, you should assume that you should you should assume that the government can read that information at least.
6:07 Amory Sivertson? It gets worse. It's not just that some government agent is scrolling through your feed. It's that all that data, your profile, mine, everyone's, has been scooped up and put on the marketplace as a product the government can buy in bulk and use for its own intelligence purposes.
6:27 Speaker 04 The truth is that like, the way that things are being architected now is that the social media companies or data brokers are really collecting information on everyone. And then the government can come along and run queries on that information.
6:45 Amory Sivertson? The Trump administration is very interested in running queries on our online data. Here's just a sample of some of the contracts Dell told us about.
6:55 Speaker 04 Palantir sits kind of at the center of all of this. There's a company called Zingle Labs. They Supposedly process like eight billion social media posts a day. Anytime you've posted a picture of your face online, there's companies like Clearview AI that are scraping those. They just got a $9.2 million ICE contract in September.
7:18 Ben Brock Johnson? And boy, is that just the tip of the surveillance iceberg. I'm Ben, stop surveilling my data Brock Johnson.
7:26 Amory Sivertson? I'm Amory, social media is a slippery slope, Sivertson.
7:29 Ben Brock Johnson? And you're listening to Endless Threat.
7:32 Amory Sivertson? Coming to you from WBUR, Boston's NPR.
7:35 Ben Brock Johnson? Today's episode, socials for sale.
7:44 Ben Brock Johnson? All right, Amory, we know the government, more specifically, the Department of Homeland Security and ICE is watching and lurking on our social media data.
7:54 Amory Sivertson? And the question is, what for?
7:58 Speaker 04 I mean, I think the mission is to deport as many brown people out of the country as possible. You have like ramped up quotas over at DHS, they're trying to like kick 3,000 people out of the country a day or arrest them and put them in these camps. So it's used towards that. I mean, it's also used to silence dissent. I mean, they're using it against protesters. That's very clear. And they are using it as well for its chilling effect.
8:29 Amory Sivertson? Is the purpose to build this massively comprehensive database that just has you put in a name and it can tell you absolutely everything about a person? Or are they looking for certain key words, key sentiments, key threats?
8:49 Speaker 04 You can use it both ways. Like you can use, you can use a keyword search, maybe. To pull a list of people out of this database, or you can have like an individual that you want to investigate and put their name into it and pull out a ton of information about them.
9:07 Ben Brock Johnson? Put simply, the government can use our social media data to create lists of people to target, or it can build dossiers on people they're already targeting.
9:15 Amory Sivertson? When it comes to identifying targets, one of the key tools DHS is using is facial recognition.
9:23 Speaker 04 If you are making comments online about the government that they don't like, which can be very benign, they may try to identify you. They have this face print. They know from that face print like which protest you were at, maybe like what time, location, things like that. They can put a name to a face and then they can move you into a derogatory, what they call like a derogatory list, which is just a watch list of people who they have no, they don't necessarily have any evidence that you've committed any crime, but you know, it's a secret watch list of the kind that the FBI has also run in the past.
10:01 Ben Brock Johnson? So what kind of benign comment online might get you flagged? You know, just, just asking for a friend?
10:08 Speaker 04 The example that stands out most right now is anyone who is monitoring ICE activities. Like ICE is here, this is where they are. There was a lot of websites that people were circulating that were meant to like track ICE activity. There were apps, websites that had maps on them. This is where ICE activity was happening. That kind of stuff drove them absolutely crazy. And, you know, they were not willing to interpret it as citizens, you know, observing law enforcement activity legally.
10:51 Amory Sivertson? So the government can watch you, but they don't like when you're watching them.
11:00 Amory Sivertson? But let's go back to that facial recognition piece that Dell was talking about. Because according to his reporting, ICE agents out in the field will take pictures of people, and then they can see in real time if someone's face brings up a match in a database.
11:18 Ben Brock Johnson? But there's a big problem with that. This isn't like running someone's fingerprints or driver's license through a database to see if they have a warrant or something. Dell says the facial recognition technology being used isn't entirely accurate, and the government knows it's not accurate, but it's getting used anyway.
11:39 Speaker 04 There's a high possibility that when they take a picture of someone, they're not going to get the right result. And what we've seen in litigation and court filings and testimony over and over is that it doesn't really matter. Like, they run the face once, they'll get no match. They'll try to run it again, they may get no match, and then they just arrest the person anyway.
12:01 Amory Sivertson? DHS told NPR that the app they're using for these facial scans does not rely on open source media or social media. But that doesn't mean they're not using that data elsewhere.
12:13 Ben Brock Johnson? This February, Dell reported on a contract between US Customs and Border Protection and a company called Clearview AI that would give officials access to billions of images scraped from the internet, including faces, for the tidy sum of $225,000 a year.
12:33 Amory Sivertson? Which doesn't sound like that much money, actually.
12:35 Ben Brock Johnson? Yeah, I mean, I basically pay that for my television subscriptions at this point.
12:43 Amory Sivertson? So we know the government is interested in facial recognition as part of its anti-immigration agenda, even when that tech is less than perfect. But there's more. They're interested in our location data, too.
12:58 Ben Brock Johnson? If the government can figure out where people are, it can use that information to better target them in immigration raids.
13:05 Amory Sivertson? And they're going to use third-party contract analysts to do that work for them. Last year, Dell reported on ICE's plans to station nearly 30 private analysts at agency facilities in Vermont and Southern California.
13:18 Ben Brock Johnson? Those analysts would be tasked with one job: to scour our social media feeds and drum up new targets for immigration officials, relying heavily on artificial intelligence and commercial databases to get the job done.
13:33 Amory Sivertson? The analysts are digging for posts where people might mention their location, like, "Hey, I'm at a party at this person's house," or "just grabbing a sweet treat from this coffee shop I love."
13:45 Speaker 04 They're looking through your posts, seeing what neighborhoods you're in. They build social maps, so you'll have a post from someone that was at a barbecue with someone else. And they try to collate that information to figure out where this person they're hunting is likely to be, who their friends are, who their family is. That way that they can narrow down the scope of what physical geographical location this person is likely to be in.
14:13 Ben Brock Johnson? Once the analysts have enough information about someone's location, Dell says they'll put a targeting package together and send it to an enforcement branch who can then carry out the raid.
14:24 Amory Sivertson? Even if you're chronically offline and you and your friends don't generally post about your location, that location data still isn't safe from the government because it's for sale.
14:39 Ben Brock Johnson? Lots of apps on your phone collect location data, like the weather app. That data is usually used to advertise something to you, but the government can buy it too. And, well, it is.
14:52 Speaker 04 Basically, they're buying... Your location data from a data broker who is getting that location data from potentially your cell phone company is selling it. Or apps that you're using on your phone are collecting your location data and selling it to these data brokers. And then ICE is buying it. So they're buying a ton of that every day.
15:13 Amory Sivertson? Technically, your location data shouldn't be easily available to the government. Thanks to a Supreme Court case from 2018, Carpenter v. United States.
15:23 Speaker 04 The Supreme Court ruled basically that like, location data was sensitive enough that it required a warrant. The way that the government gets around that now is by, instead of demanding it with the subpoena, they just pay the company to give them that data.
15:40 Ben Brock Johnson? If you can't do it yourself, buy it from someone who can.
15:43 Amory Sivertson? The government is still using subpoenas to try to get other information it's interested in. Like, for example, the email addresses and phone numbers of social media accounts criticizing ICE. That's according to reporting from the New York Times from this February.
15:59 Ben Brock Johnson? Social media companies don't always have to turn over the information, not right away at least. Except...
16:06 Speaker 04 So there's a lot of cooperation with industry to hand over this, especially if it's like financially lucrative for them to do that. The other kind of aspect of it is that as social media was really becoming a thing and the internet was kind of truly exploding through like the 2010s and into the last decade, these companies like Facebook and Google, Twitter would start getting flooded. I mean, they were just getting flooded with subpoenas and requests. And at some point, it just became advantageous for them to set up their own offices and kind of begin cooperating with law enforcement
16:47 Speaker 04 to help walk them through the process, maybe help them, tell them exactly where they, what they need to fill in to get the subpoena to go through.
16:56 Ben Brock Johnson? Something about that really like bothers me.
16:59 Speaker 04 It should.
16:59 Ben Brock Johnson? It should, right?
17:01 Speaker 04 Like Twitter used to fight subpoenas, like before it was owned by Elon Musk. You know, that's Twitter deciding that it wants to spend money defending its users rather than comply with the request. So it's really up to the companies now. I mean, do you think Elon Musk is going to fight those subpoenas? The thing you kind of have to think about now is that most... Or nearly all of the major social media companies are also defense contractors or in bed in some way with the intelligence community.
17:36 Amory Sivertson? We asked Dell for some examples of how social media companies are intertwined with the government, like X, now owned by XAI, which is owned by SpaceX, a major government contractor.
17:49 Ben Brock Johnson? And then there's Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook, Threads, and WhatsApp. By its own admission, Meta has made its open source AI available for US government agencies, including the military and the intelligence community, to use.
18:04 Amory Sivertson? And don't forget LinkedIn, owned by Microsoft, another defense contractor. Microsoft has a whole page on its website dedicated to how their services can support US intelligence and defense.
18:16 Ben Brock Johnson? Man, it is getting a little cozy in this bed, Amory. Social media companies and the intelligence community all rolling around together. How is this a twin bed? Is it a queen? Is it a king? You know, I feel like everybody's poly, but are we actually conscious that we're poly in this bed right now?
18:37 Amory Sivertson? I do not know, but I think it might be time to change the sheets. You know what I'm saying?
18:43 Ben Brock Johnson? Yeah, it's getting funky. In a minute, some of the consequences of this kind of surveillance and whether there's any remaining protections on our data in this brave new world.
19:14 Speaker 00 Support for this podcast comes from Is Business Broken?, a podcast from the Marotra Institute at BU Questrom School of Business. How should employers measure real skills in the age of AI?
19:26 Speaker 05 Instead of observing the final artifact, instead of observing the final essay or the final program, observe the entire process of creation.
19:35 Speaker 00 Follow Is Business Broken? wherever you get your podcasts and stick around until the end of this podcast for a preview of a recent episode on rethinking academic and job assessment when AI can do the work.
19:53 Speaker 06 Migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more.
19:57 Speaker 02 Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It prevents, on average, eight to nine headache days a month versus six to seven for placebo.
20:10 Speaker 07 Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away. As difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis, or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.
20:47 Speaker 06 Why wait? Ask your doctor. Visit botoxchronicmigraine.com or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more.
20:55 Amory Sivertson? You know, Ben, sometimes when people talk about this kind of surveillance, there's this undercurrent of like, oh, well, the government says it's going after criminals, and I'm not a criminal, and I'm a US citizen. I don't have anything to hide, so it's fine.
21:12 Ben Brock Johnson? But when the slope gets a little slippery for some people, it eventually gets real slippery for all people.
21:19 Speaker 04 If you want to see a slippery slope, last April, social media became a negative factor in the processing of immigration services. Social media became a negative factor in discretionary adjudication for antisemitism. So that's all tied back into the protests of the war in Gaza. And a few months later, in August, they added anti-Americanism, which is now, that's an overwhelmingly negative factor for immigration services processing.
21:57 Amory Sivertson? And while the examples that privacy journalist Dell Cameron is talking about there involve how the government is treating immigrants who are already in the country, he says the overall approach here reminds him of another turbulent time in American history.
22:13 Speaker 04 You know, that really borrows from the Cold War era bar on communists and anarchists. There's a lot, there's a lot of parallels between kind of the McCarthy era, the use of red squads. What they didn't have in that era, you know, was the microchip. They had index cards that filled hundreds of cabinets where they would keep on people. They don't even need to build dossiers on people anymore, which is what they were doing in the 90s. And they have access to such vast databases all over that have all this information and collect it in one place that they can kind of hit a button and create a dossier on you at any time.
22:54 Ben Brock Johnson? It's like more powerful and less accurate.
22:58 Speaker 04 It's less accurate and there's no way for you to really contest what it says or possibly even know that it exists. But you can't, you know, you can't contest the inaccurate information in the dossier that the government is using to make decisions about how it's going to treat you.
23:16 Amory Sivertson? When we think about right now, what can't ICE do?
23:22 Speaker 04 Yeah, I mean, they can do almost everything. The things that are really protected are the contents of your messages, texts and conversations. That receives the most protection and it receives even more protection if it's in transit, if they're trying to intercept that information live, if they're trying to wiretap you. Everything else can be bought and sold, basically.
23:49 Amory Sivertson? So your text messages and DMs, probably safe. Anything else you post, probably not.
23:59 Amory Sivertson? So there were some people who were in charge of making sure the government was using these tools in a way that didn't violate privacy.
24:07 Ben Brock Johnson? Small itty bitty problem, though.
24:10 Speaker 04 One of the things kind of you have to recall is that like in March 2025, that's when the reduction in force notices went out. That gutted, for instance, the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, which was the body that handled complaints about facial recognition in particular, and social media monitoring abuses. There were also, you know, significant changes to the privacy offices inside of DHS.
24:42 Ben Brock Johnson? Emery, I think anybody who's, you know, reasonably aware of everything that has happened since Edward Snowden assumes that there's a certain amount of just broad surveillance happening of Americans and people living in America, whatever their citizenship status is, all the time, right? But we're entering into this world where the government is outsourcing a ton of that work to algorithms and private companies. And the work is both bigger and broader than it's ever been. You know, we're outsourcing it outside of the government. We're outsourcing it outside of humans.
25:22 Ben Brock Johnson? But the implications feel very dystopian and also very personal. They feel like the impact of this stuff is extremely personal and potentially traumatic. And that worries me.
25:38 Amory Sivertson? Yeah. I mean, a lot of what Dell is reporting on feels like the fine print of being an American in 2026. And a lot of people have been feeling the sort of like fine print vibe for a long time. You know, being an American is not the same from person to person, but now we're becoming more aware, at least I hope we're becoming more aware, of the ways in which we're being surveilled that we didn't even know was legal. And it feels like the rules are suddenly changing right under our feet.
26:13 Ben Brock Johnson? We're basically weaponizing data in new ways. And we're doing it with way less.
26:21 Ben Brock Johnson? Oversight from government watchdogs that are supposed to protect us from government overreach.
26:28 Amory Sivertson? But there are some people still watching. There's Dell, who spends every day swimming in this stuff, which we realized is actually kind of a vulnerable thing. Yeah. Do you worry for yourself at all covering, covering this particular issue?
26:45 Speaker 04 You know, I, I, I don't want to be vain and think like, the government is spying on me specifically like, oh, man, they must have read that thing I wrote last week. I bet they're really mad and they're listening to my phone calls, but, you know, they don't necessarily have to, I mean, the, the targeting doesn't have to be that specific. I think that they can, the technology, I mean, AI in particular, the technology is there now where it doesn't necessarily require a lot of people sitting around like thinking about you.
27:21 Speaker 04 You know, they can make a list of journalists and run that through a system and pull out whatever information they want. They're not supposed to. There's supposed to be someone there that says, no, you can't do that. But they mostly fired all of those people. So, yeah, I mean, I definitely worry about it. And certainly, and in every case, if I'm dealing with like a source, like we're using the utmost protection possible.
27:47 Ben Brock Johnson? What does that look like? Is it like signal chats and whatnot?
27:53 Speaker 04 I mean, yeah, certainly Signal is kind of the bar for encrypted communications. It's what I think most journalists use. There are other tools, but end to end encryption is a must. And then, I mean, but i- in some cases, it looks like, you know, getting on a plane and flying and sitting in a cafe and meeting someone.
28:12 Ben Brock Johnson? Yep.
28:13 Speaker 04 Which is very, you know, it sounds a little James Bond, but if you have a source and they're, you know, scared and they have a right to be scared, it can look like that.
28:23 Ben Brock Johnson? Dell says, if we want things to get better, maybe they have to get worse first.
28:31 Speaker 04 You have to ask yourself whether you want your children growing up in a neighborhood where every time they go outside, they feel like they're being photographed or even recorded. I don't think that that's like the place that people want to live. I think we're trapped. I don't, you know, people use the like 1984 metaphor a lot, but it doesn't necessarily apply because to some degree, we are doing this to ourselves. We're buying this technology. We're normalizing it every day. In order to participate in society, you have to, you now have to make yourself vulnerable to the state's surveillance.
29:09 Speaker 04 I think the rampant abuse of it that we're seeing may accelerate the amount of pushback to it that could, you know, it could result now in some, in some laws.
29:27 Ben Brock Johnson? So what do you think, Gamery? More laws? Should we have that?
29:30 Amory Sivertson? Oh, I think, I think that's a piece of the puzzle of what maybe needs to happen here because I, I don't have much faith that tech companies are going to regulate themselves either.
29:41 Ben Brock Johnson? No?
29:41 Amory Sivertson? But, no, no, I don't. But I guess my silver lining is, is Dell's reporting, knowing that there is someone out there talking about what's happening, even when government oversight itself is falling short.
29:57 Ben Brock Johnson? Hmm. Major headline, journalist thinks that journalists are important?
30:04 Amory Sivertson? Yeah.
30:05 Ben Brock Johnson? I'm, I'm.
30:05 Amory Sivertson? Yeah, I do.
30:07 Ben Brock Johnson? I do too. I do too. The point is well taken that our world is kind of like built around this stuff at this point in a really complicated way. So you can't just like necessarily, well, you can technically go and live in the woods and never, never engage with it. But, you know, eventually it's possible also that people will just opt out of a lot of this stuff and, and not check that I agree box, not sign the ULA, the end user license agreement. And, and, you know, we have that individual power to not sign it and we have collective power in a bunch of us not signing it and not signing up for this stuff in a
30:46 Ben Brock Johnson? way that sort of changes the economy of how this stuff works and removes it as a tool that's useful for the government.
30:55 Amory Sivertson? Yeah. Yeah. It'd be hard for me to opt out of the weather app, but. Less hard for me to opt out of social media. It is possible, just saying. And who knows, maybe eventually just the awareness of the ways in which we are being surveilled could translate into some real changes of behavior and real change overall. Or at least something that makes our privacy seem less like fine print and more like something that can't be negotiated or sold.
31:26 Ben Brock Johnson? Yeah, I'm looking forward to Signal releasing its weather wrap. Can't wait.
31:33 Amory Sivertson? We're waiting.
31:40 Amory Sivertson? One more note before we go. We asked the Department of Homeland Security a bunch of questions, including how the government uses social media data, how agents use facial recognition technology in the field, and we put the criticism to them that this enforcement is having a chilling effect on dissent.
31:59 Ben Brock Johnson? While the agency didn't answer any of those questions directly, a spokesperson did write back to say DHS wouldn't, quote, "confirm or deny law enforcement capabilities or methods," unquote, adding, quote, "DHS law enforcement methods abide by the US Constitution, including the Fourth Amendment."
32:20 Amory Sivertson? And speaking of the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled in late June that people have a, quote, "reasonable expectation of privacy when it comes to smartphone location data." The opinion came in a case about geo-fencing, when law enforcement asks tech companies for information about all the people whose phones were near a particular crime scene. That case was kicked back to a lower court, and you better believe we are going to be watching where that goes, so stay tuned.
32:52 Amory Sivertson? Endless Thread is a production of WBUR in Boston. This episode was written and produced by Kalyani Saxena. It was co-hosted by me, Amory Sivertson.
33:01 Ben Brock Johnson? And me, Ben Brock Johnson. It was edited by Dave Shaw and Meg Cramer. Mix and sound design by Marquise Neal.
33:08 Amory Sivertson? The rest of our team is Dean Russell, Emily Jankowski, Grace Tatter, our production manager, Paul Vikes, and managing producer, Sumit Joshi.
33:16 Ben Brock Johnson? Endless Thread is a show about the blurred lines between using the weather app for forecasts and using the weather app for surveillance.
33:23 Amory Sivertson? If you have an untold history, an unsolved mystery, or some other wild story from the internet that you want us to tell, hit us up, [email protected] . And we figured we should also remind you, if you have a story that you want to share more discreetly, we are on signal. That number is 646-456-9095. Again, 646-456-9095. You can also find that in our show notes.
34:12 Speaker 00 Support for this podcast comes from Is Business Broken, a podcast from the Marotra Institute at BU Questrom School of Business. Follow Is Business Broken wherever you get your podcasts and listen on for a preview of a recent episode featuring Janet Kang, Executive Director of the Just Horizons Alliance, on who stands to benefit from AI in education.
34:35 Speaker 06 I am absolutely in favor of AI in learning in the right context.
34:40 Speaker 07 And just to explain why you're excited about it.
34:41 Speaker 06 Oh, my gosh, individualized support, right? Personalization and to be able to scale quality education in places where it was historically impossible. So for certain kinds of learners with different kinds of learning styles and disabilities, for example, speakers of different languages, there are amazing ways AI can boost learning. It just has to be with the right context. And age appropriateness is something we do a lot of work in because it is very different depending on where in that maturity cycle you are in terms of how your brain develops.
35:13 Speaker 00 Find the full episode by searching for Is Business Broken wherever you get your podcasts and learn more about the Marotra Institute for Business Markets and Society at ibms.bu.edu.
35:31 Speaker 07 Reimagine how you do wellness with new first of their kind Mochi Bites from the number one gummy supplement brand, Ollie. Multi, beauty, energy, and sleep Mochi Bites are certified vegan, gluten-free, made with naturally sourced sweeteners, delectably tasty, and take your routine from mundane to extraordinary, all while delivering the same expert benefits. Elevate your wellness with Mochi Bites today. Sold exclusively at Target. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
36:02 Ben Brock Johnson? This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Football has a play for just about everything. You can go deep, keep it on the ground, or draw up something nobody sees coming. And whether you want to run a flea flicker or the tush push, you need a plan to fit your unique situation. That's why State Farm takes the time to get to know you so they can help personalize coverage for your life and budget. Now that's a solid game plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
Previous Encore: Adrián and the Whale Next How to Dim the Sun, from Marketplace's How We Survive Page updated October 29, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated