Pod Insights The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway America’s New Age of Political Violence — with Barbara F. Walter About this episode Scott speaks with Barbara F. Walter, professor at UC San Diego and author of How Civil Wars Start, about what the Charlie Kirk assassination reveals about America’s political future. They discuss how leaders exploit crises, why the U. S. is at higher risk of civil unrest, and how social media and young men fit into the rise of political violence. Barbara also shares what can be done to strengthen democracy and reduce the risk of conflict.
Follow Barbara F. Walter’s Substack, Here Be Dragons: Warning Signs from the Edges of Democracy.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript 6,258 words · 12 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:01 Speaker 00 This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.
0:26 Speaker 01 Still waiting in line? Again? That's time you'll never get back. Save time and money with stamps.com. Over 4 million businesses have skipped the line with stamps.com. Join them to save up to 90% off carrier rates from your computer or phone right now. Print postage for certified mail, registered mail, and packages in seconds. Then schedule a pickup right from your home or office. For a limited time, go to stamps.com and use code PODCAST for a free welcome gift. Taxes and fees apply.
0:57 Speaker 02 This episode is brought to you by Tic Tac. Lace up and get your game on because the Tic Tac lineup just got a new teammate. Dr. Pepper Tic Tac. This new double threat puts two of your favorite flavors into one box of mints. And when two iconic flavors come together, the result can only be iconic. Score big. Try Dr. Pepper Tic Tac today.
1:27 Scott Galloway? So the murder of Charlie Kirk, this feels different. It feels as if we're on the precipice of something really dark. And I was thinking, when's the last time
1:36 Scott Galloway? the nation was in this type of dark mood? And I would argue it's been a very long time. There's something very strange going on here. The vibe is very much that we are perhaps entering a descent into some sort of darkness. Even the January 6 riot or insurrection, whatever the term you want to use, it was embarrassing, or I found it embarrassing and humiliating, and it made me angry. But this makes me, or I think this makes us somewhat a little bit queasy. This feels as if something really terrible might happen. That this might be the starting gun or the ending gun for some sort of downward spiral.
2:17 Scott Galloway? And we wanted to bring in someone who has a background in civil wars and political violence. So we found Professor Barbara Walter, who is a professor at UC San Diego School of Global Policy. Anyways, with that, let's bust right into it in this very, what feels like a very precarious, unsettling time. Here's our conversation with Professor Barbara Walter.
2:53 Scott Galloway? Professor Walters, where does this podcast find you?
2:56 Speaker 04 I'm in San Diego right now.
2:58 Scott Galloway? I was born in San Diego. My parents were living in Toronto. My mom was seven months pregnant and they got sick of the Toronto winter and they read an article saying San Diego had the best weather in North America. So they drove there and I was born there a few weeks later. Anyways, let's bust right into this. As somebody who's studied political violence, what stands out to you most in the aftermath of the Kirk assassination?
3:22 Speaker 04 So what worries me about the Kirk murder or, or any type of crisis or crisis or emergency that happens between now and 2028 is that there is always an end game to democracy. And, and the end game is how does an aspiring dictator actually finally shut the door on, on democracy? And it's not easy to do because citizens don't want to give up their rights and freedoms. And so if they think they're losing, that, that democracy is about to disappear, they'll, they'll, they'll fight against that. So the strategy that you see these aspiring dictators pursue time and time again is
4:04 Speaker 04 they seek a crisis or an emergency, or they manufacture a crisis or a war. Netanyahu is doing that right now in the Middle East to keep himself in power. But it could also be something like the Charlie Kirk murder, where you use this. And we have a name for people who use, they're violence entrepreneurs. You use a violent episode to, one, demonize your opponent, say, oh, my gosh, look, they're animals, or they're dangerous, or they're going to kill you. And, and, two, to convince people that power needs to be centralized, to declare a state
4:44 Speaker 04 of emergency, to declare martial law, and people will almost always trade freedom for security. And so I think, I don't think this is that Reichstag moment, and I write about it in my Substack newsletter, this is not the Reichstag moment. But I think there will be a moment between now and 2028 where Trump finds some crisis and uses it to scare the bejesus out of Americans and convince them that he needs to gain more power to protect them, and Americans are going to give it to him.
5:21 Scott Galloway? I've read that a lot of times that these individuals think that they're, in order to capture social capital, believe that this is sort of a heroic act of violence. I've also noticed a pattern with political violence, that it tends to be young men, young white men. And I'm curious also, have you done any studies connecting online behavior and a certain type of online behavior with either political violence or just mass shootings in general?
5:53 Speaker 04 I haven't done that particular research. Interestingly enough, Facebook has. Do you remember a few Decembers back? There was a whistleblower, a Facebook employer named Francis Haugen, who turned over tens of thousands of pages of internal Facebook documentation to Congress and to The Wall Street Journal. And those documents outlined the internal experiments and studies that Facebook had done with the universe of the data that only Facebook has access to. And they looked at the effects of online time
6:34 Speaker 04 on a whole host of outcomes, from depression to anxiety to violence. And, you know, not surprisingly, they found that the more time you spent on Facebook and I assume other social media outlets, and again, you'd have to look at the content they were looking at, the more likely you were to experience a lot of these negative outcomes. So Facebook knows that. We also found out recently that Facebook suppressed information they had about the effects of social media on children. So we know that spending hours and hours a day
7:18 Speaker 04 alone in your, you know, living room or in your bedroom, watching violent videos or engaging in really extremist chat rooms does increase how radical you ultimately become and how likely you are to use violence. So, and then to get back to young men. The vast majority of this type of violence is committed by young men. And young men are spending more and more time online. And in some ways, it's really, it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy. Here are all these... You know, a young man with, with, with, you know, promising futures.
8:01 Speaker 04 This was a straight, an A student. He got a full scholarship to college. He had his whole world ahead of him. And, and yet, most of his time increasingly was spent online. And we'll find out exactly what he was, what he was looking at and what he was engaging in. But we know that that does not make for healthy, well-adjusted, peaceful people.
8:28 Scott Galloway? There's been a lot of discussion or a lot of rhetoric around, you know, kind of this is war. And then some other people saying that feels, that one of the reasons this just feels so awful is it feels like there's a sense in the air that we may be on the precipice of something just very bad. And you have actually studied civil wars and around the world. And what are the kind of the, you've studied them globally. When you look at America today, what parallels or kind of warning signs do you see?
9:02 Speaker 04 Well, I'll, I'll start with the, the underlying conditions. For five years, between 2017 and 2021, I served on a task force run by the CIA called the Political Instability Task Force. And one of the goals of that task force was to come up with a model that would help the US government predict what types of countries were likely to experience political violence and political instability within the next two years. And when this model was created, you had two types of people on the task force. You had, you had experts on conflict like myself and you had data analysts who worked for the agency. And the data analysts asked the experts to, they asked them to tell them everything
9:46 Speaker 04 we, we thought might potentially lead a country down the path towards war. And we gave them 38 different factors. So we actually didn't know which were the most important ones. So things like poverty, whether a country heavily discriminated against a particular group, whether a country was ethnically homogeneous or not, all sorts of stuff. And the analysts went away. And when they came back, they said, hmm, it turns out only, only two conditions were highly predictive. And they were not the conditions that the experts expected. The first condition is something we called anocracy. All that means is a partial democracy.
10:30 Speaker 04 So the vast majority of political violence, the vast majority of civil wars, do not happen in healthy democracies and they do not happen in full autocracies. They happen in between, in this middle zone, where a country has some elements of democracy and they have some elements of autocracy. And they especially happen in these anocracies if they're rapidly moving from one side to another. So if you have a democracy that's rapidly declining, that puts it at risk of political violence. If you have an autocracy that's rapidly democratizing, think about Yugoslavia in the 1990s. That's where you get political violence.
11:14 Speaker 04 So that's the most important feature. Do you have a weak and rapidly changing type of democracy? The second is whether citizens in those anocracies were basically choosing political party based on race, religion, or ethnicity rather than on ideology. So you're joining a political party not because, not mostly because you're conservative or liberal, but you're joining because you're black or white or Muslim or Christian or Serb or Croat. So if a country had these two features, it was a partial democracy with these identity-based political parties. The task force put that country on a watch list.
11:59 Speaker 04 And we called it the watch list. And we considered it at high risk of political violence and instability within the next two years. So if you take those underlying conditions and you think about the United States today, the United States is now solidly in the anocracy zone based on the measure we used on the task force. We are no longer considered by any group that studies democracy a full democracy. We are in this middle zone. If you look at our political parties. They started breaking down into, you know, by race and religion, starting around 2018. It got a little bit better in the last election,
12:41 Speaker 04 where Latino men and African American men gravitated from the Democratic Party towards the Republican Party. But I suspect that's going to go back in the next election. So by both of these measures, the United States is in this high-risk category today. Those are the underlying conditions. So then, look at the more immediate conditions. So what tends to trigger civil war? What tends to trigger civil war? Often contested elections. It's elections that people don't trust, elections that are very close, and elections that have this sort of
13:25 Speaker 04 winner-take-all, zero-sum feeling to them, that if you lose the election, there might never be another election again, and you might permanently be shut out of power. When you have that surrounding elections, people tend to start to give up on playing by the rules. And the more extreme elements in the parties and their message, which is, you know, "The system is broken. You know, we're never going to fix it. Violence is justified." That message begins to resonate with the more moderate members of the party. And that's when you start to get in trouble.
14:06 Scott Galloway? We'll be right back.
14:13 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Bilt. Most of us work hard to earn our keep, but usually, there's no one around to hand you a cookie when you successfully pay your monthly housing bill. No one except Bilt, that is. Bilt has expanded from the original renter rewards program, and they have a lot more going on for members now. For example, members can earn points on mortgage payments, too. Every housing payment gets you points that get you a lot more than baked goods, such as flights with top travel partners, including United and Hyatt, Lyft rides, Amazon.com purchases, and much, much more. Here's another benefit of Built membership. You also get access to what they call a neighborhood concierge. You can make restaurant reservations, book fitness classes, and find new local spots, all while rewarding you and more than 45,000 merchant partners. It's simple.
14:55 Scott Galloway? Being a renter and now owning a home feels a lot better with Built. You can download the Built app and join the membership for where you live at joinbuilt.com/profg. That's J-O-I-N-B-I-L-T.com/profg. Use our link so they know we sent you.
15:13 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Upwork. Trying to scale your business? At some point, you're probably going to hit a point where you need some help. Sometimes the best way to break through that is bringing in the right talent at the right time. Upwork can help. Upwork is a one-stop platform where you can find, hire, and pay expert freelancers across more than 125 categories. Whether you need specialized skills for a single project or extra support to keep up with demand, it's easy to connect with experienced professionals, review their work, and find the right fit. You can move faster without taking on the commitment of full-time hires. And for businesses that need the very best talent, Upwork Business Plus provides access to the top 1% of freelancers on the platform. AI-powered matching connects you with qualified candidates in under six hours, cutting down the time spent searching. Upwork also takes care of contracts,
15:58 Scott Galloway? payments, and other administrative tasks, so you can spend less time managing logistics and more time focused on what's next. Visit upwork.com/profg right now and post your job for free. That's upwork.com/profg to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's U-P-W-O-R-K.com/profg. Upwork.com/profg.
16:24 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Vanta. As AI adoption grows, so does your company's security risks and requirements. New frameworks, audits, and vendors keep piling on, but your team isn't getting any bigger. Most compliance tools promise automation, but you're really stuck doing all the work by hand, chasing screenshots, validating controls, and playing catch-up when audit season comes around again. Vanta works differently. The regentic trust platform is built to scale with you, not slow you down. With over 1,400 automated tests across 400-plus integrations, Vanta collects evidence and monitors your controls year-round, cutting your audit prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the Vanta agent everywhere you work, whether your team is in Vanta every day or living in tools including Claude or Cursor. Want proof?
17:09 Scott Galloway? Over 16,000 fast-growing companies like Ramp, Ryder, and Harvey save time and resources while scaling fast with Vanta. Learn more at vanta.com/profg and get $1,000 off. That's spelled V-A-N-T-A dot com slash profg for $1,000 off.
17:33 Scott Galloway? I think that's fascinating, this notion of an anocracy, and that is somewhere in between. If you're Singapore, China, or Russia, quite frankly, not a lot of risk. If you're, I don't know, Japan or Canada, healthy democracy, but something, some hybrid in between isn't a good place to be. I think that's really fascinating. The second thing you mentioned that I didn't get a strong feel for whether we're there or not is when things are, when there's racial divisiveness. A lot of this rhetoric is positioned as white Christian nationalists. Obviously, non-whites tend to gravitate, I think, towards a more progressive viewpoint. Well, I'll stop there. Do you think we fit the conditions for that second criteria?
18:17 Speaker 04 You know, it's really interesting. You know, I thought by this time, Donald Trump in his second term, we would clearly fit that criteria because I, you know... Donald Trump, in his first term, was more upfront. I thought about supporting the white nationalist agenda. He sort of allotted the rioters or the people who were parading in Charlottesville in 2017. He stepped back a bit with that, and I think he's realized that, for example, Latino community could be a potential voting bloc for him. You know, he hasn't really, you know, his immigration rates have disproportionately
19:02 Speaker 04 affected non-whites, but I think he's a little more sensitive to the fact that Latinos helped him win. They're the fastest-growing population here in the United States. They're not going away, and he doesn't want to alienate them too much. And because the white population is declining compared to other groups in the United States, the Republican Party needs to reach across racial and religious lines. And so I think he's been a little more sensitive to that. But having said that, you know, after the 2020 election, if you looked at who voted,
19:43 Speaker 04 you know, how Americans vote, the vast majority of Black Americans voted Democrat. They still do. A majority of Latinos vote Democrat. A majority of, a large majority of Muslims and Jews and Asians vote Democrat. And whites overwhelmingly vote Republican. It was about 80% of whites voted Republican. And this is in a country that's multi-ethnic and multi-religious. So that really starts to meet this criteria of identity-based rather than ideologically-based. And also, when you look at who gravitated towards the Republican Party over the last
20:27 Speaker 04 10, 15 years, it was working-class whites. And ideologically, they would be much better served by the Democrats. So they're choosing the Republican Party for a whole host of other reasons unrelated to, you know, what would be in their economic and social interests.
20:45 Scott Galloway? So what's your sense of things? Do you feel that the table is set for something? And revolutions can take on different forms, right? Or civil war can take on different forms. Do you think the table has been set for some sort of civil unrest that only gets worse and worse? Or like most things, will this begin, will the half-life of this be a few weeks and we'll move on to the next big thing?
21:07 Speaker 04 You know, I wish I didn't have to say this. I think we're actually in a really very tough, bad spot. And I'll tell you why. America has experienced political violence throughout our history. And in the 60s, we saw that. But the response was almost always uniform. If we go back even to the 1990s, in the 1990s, we started to see the rise of violent extremist militias in the United States. And Americans didn't really get it, didn't see this until the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. And that sort of, you know, threw them into the limelight.
21:49 Speaker 04 And the response to that by American citizens was absolute horror, absolute condemnation. It didn't matter what drove this person. It didn't matter what political affiliation he had. All Americans condemned that violence. The second thing that happened was it activated the FBI to aggressively go after militia groups across the country and figure out who the leaders were, figure out where they were organizing, and really, in some respects, neutralize them. So if you look at 1995, it was the peak of militias in the United States until recently.
22:30 Speaker 04 And after the FBI started focusing on this problem, we saw a pretty consistent and rapid decline. That is not happening today. We now, we've seen the rise of militias. Pretty quickly, since about 2008, with the election of Barack Obama. And now we're seeing a series of, you know, domestic terror attacks. And, and the response isn't by the FBI, you know, let's, let's look at, at the problem that we have and let's root it out and let's, let's figure out what's driving this. And the response by Americans is not, this is, this is absolutely terrible. You're, you're seeing pockets saying this is war.
23:14 Speaker 04 You know, this is, we need to get retribution. We need to, you know, eliminate the enemy. And this is not a healthy, a healthy dynamic. We need to treat this in a unified way, that, that violence in whatever guise, especially politically motivated violence, is not acceptable. And the FBI needs to address that. And, and we have an FBI that is politically motivated and not necessarily interested in rooting out all types of violence.
23:48 Scott Galloway? We'll be right back.
23:55 Speaker 00 This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.
24:20 Speaker 05 Hey, I'm running out to drop off a stack of letters and packages. Need anything shipped while I'm gone?
24:26 Speaker 06 Save the gas. Stamps.com lets you print postage and schedule pickups right from your desk. Sync your contacts into the address book, get detailed accounting insights, and get notified the moment your certified mail is delivered.
24:37 Speaker 05 All from my desk?
24:39 Speaker 06 All from your desk.
24:40 Speaker 07 Join the 4 million businesses using stamps.com right now with code PODCAST and get your free welcome gift. Stamps.com code PODCAST. Taxes and fees apply.
24:50 Scott Galloway? Support for the show comes from Nutraful, the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand used by over one and a half million people. When you get to the stage of life where you start to notice hair loss, you have a few options. You can shave it all off and enjoy your new look, or you can commit to a new team whose logo you wouldn't mind constantly spotting on a hat, or you can actually restore some of your hair's former glory with Nutraful. Nutraful has formulas built for men at different life stages, such as Nutraful Men for guys aged 18 to 49, or the new Nutraful Men 50 and older. It's the first product of its kind specifically made for men over 50. You can address the key root causes of thinning wherever you are in life. Grow visibly thicker, fuller hair in three to six months. Start Nutraful today and make the hat optional.
25:35 Scott Galloway? Visit nutraful.com and enter promo code PROVGE for $10 off your first month's subscription and free shipping. Find out why Nutraful is the best-selling hair growth supplement brand at nutraful.com, spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L dot com, promo code PROVGE. That's nutraful.com promo code PROVGE.
25:59 Scott Galloway? You're a full-time prof. I spend a lot of time on campus. And there seems to be a very disturbing trend among students where they seem more accepting to the notion of violence as a means of countering what they see as violence, and that is words. And today, student acceptance of violence to silent speakers is at a record high. One in three students say violence is acceptable to stop a speaker, up from one in five in 2020. What do you account for the change? What do you think is responsible for the change?
26:33 Speaker 04 I think the single biggest factor that's driving a lot of the breakdown of societal norms and societal threads and societal decency and civility is the internet. You know, if you look at countries, if you look at democracies, if you look at speech, it really didn't start to unravel and get... Really heated and negative and uncompromising until about the, you know, late 2000s. And that, of course, is the introduction of the smartphone and the
27:14 Speaker 04 rise of people's reliance on social media for most of their news. And then when you started to have algorithms that were, you know, when the tech companies figured out that they could design algorithms that would push information into people's hands that was sort of addictive, information that they couldn't keep their eyes off of, that kept them tied to their phones. That information was, in many cases, the most emotionally charged, the most incendiary. It's information that was designed to ramp up people's emotions and, you know, sense of fight or flight.
27:57 Speaker 04 And I don't think it's a surprise that 20 years later, we have a society that is much more distrustful of each other, distrustful of the system, isolated from each other. And I think that's what we're seeing. So I think that's the biggest reason, is that a lot of these kids are getting their information from social media sites, and they're being fed only a very particular segment of information. And they come to believe that. And it's delivered to them in the most impassioned way, which, of course, makes them particularly impassioned as well.
28:38 Speaker 04 And then you see them come on campus, and they've spent hours and hours and hours online talking to people who agree with them and tell them nothing different. And then they hear something different. They've also been told that those people are wrong and dangerous, and they're ready to go to battle. So that's, I think, a big part of it. I actually think universities have done a terrible job. Educating students and taking this issue head on and talking about the importance of free speech, teaching students about debate, teaching students to listen to arguments
29:18 Speaker 04 and to take them seriously and then to debate the ideas in a reasonable, logical way. I think we've basically, you know, not just not thrown our hands up, I think we've basically decided that maybe that was too hard or it might get us in trouble. Universities aren't really known and professors aren't really known to be the most courageous people and I think it's just easier to just put our heads down and, you know, think that life is going to continue as it always has. And now we're seeing the effects of that.
29:56 Scott Galloway? Like most people, I've been thinking a lot about this and I want to put forward a thesis on what the root causes are. And you've already touched on a few and have you respond to it and then move to what some potential solutions might be. I see the three legs of the stool here, if you will, is one, what we've been talking about, and that is the connection between algorithms that promote incendiary content and rage to profit. You know, we used to think sex sells, actually we found something that sells better and it's rage. And the algorithms have figured that out and pit us against, you know, each other and it's worked. We now believe that it's not Russians pouring over the border in Ukraine or the CCP or
30:39 Scott Galloway? income inequality or climate change that is our enemy, it's our neighbor who has different political beliefs in us. And then two, young men who are really struggling in our nation, lack of economic and romantic opportunities. Biologically, prefrontal cortex doesn't catch up to a woman's until they're 25, lack of male role models, an education system I would argue that is somewhat biased against them, lack of economic opportunities. And then you pair that with number one, they begin to sequester from society and like any mammal, when they're not surrounded by other relationships, they start to go, quite frankly, crazy, similar to an orca on a tank alone, or leave your dog alone for a day and see what happens. And then the kicker to all of this, we don't have a monopoly on the first two.
31:21 Scott Galloway? What we do have a monopoly on is divisive content, struggling men who have access to the guns. I found this crazy stat in the US, in the, I'm in London right now. In the UK, there's going to be 30 gun deaths this year. There's 120 a day in the United States. So since Charlie Cook's assassination or murder two days ago, there's already been eight times the number of gun deaths in the US that there will be all year in the UK. Where do I have that wrong? And what, what color would you add to that?
31:54 Speaker 04 It is absolutely right, and I couldn't state it better than you just stated it. The only thing I'll add is if, if the gunman who killed Charlie Kirk hadn't had access to the internet, if the, if this was pre 2008, the world that you and I grew up in, and he didn't have access to guns, he would still be in college and he'd still have a future ahead of him. And Charlie Kirk would still be alive. He would not have been radicalized. All of these poor kids, um, most of them are, you know, young men are being radicalized online. And the radicalization pipeline goes straight through the five biggest tech companies of the world, all of which are American.
32:36 Scott Galloway? What you just said is so powerful. I hadn't thought of it that way. I mean, it's just so obvious, but I think that's real, what real insight is, is you say just something obvious that,
32:47 Scott Galloway? it's obvious after you hear it. And that is if this kid hadn't had access to the internet, he would be a scholarship student and wouldn't be spending the rest of his life in prison. And Charlie Kirk, a father of two, would still be alive. I can't stop thinking as a parent of two boys. You know, I guess some combination of family members and friends basically figured out that he had done it. And can you imagine that drive to the jail station, to, to the prison?
33:13 Speaker 04 No, I can't, actually it, it breaks my, it breaks my heart.
33:16 Scott Galloway? As a parent?
33:17 Speaker 04 It breaks my heart. It breaks my heart for everybody involved.
33:20 Scott Galloway? And I can't even imagine. But that is just so, I, I think that's just so. You know, I just hadn't thought of it that way. That if this kid hadn't had access to the Internet, most likely, this just wouldn't have. This just wouldn't have happened. So let's move to. Let's move to solutions. You are on these task forces. You're not only helping to identify for our intelligence apparatus, what nations are vulnerable, such that we can plan.
33:53 Scott Galloway? What if you if you were asked to serve on another task force? And my guess is you probably will be that said, all right, what are some common sense solutions to reduce political violence, the likelihood of civil war? I won't even go to gun violence, because that's just. Let's talk about political violence and reduce the likelihood of civil war. What would you suggest are two or three programs that the government should be considering?
34:21 Speaker 04 So Scott, there are lots of common sense solutions. The problem is, we don't have common sense politicians right now on either side. And I'll so. And I'll tell you why. We know from our from the government, the US government's own task force, that if you if you have a strong, healthy democracy, you don't experience this type of violence. You actually experience peace and prosperity like the United States has done for, you know, certainly since the end of end of World War Two and for black Americans since the Civil Rights Movement. So that is the single most important thing we can do is to strengthen our democracy. But if you look back, we and we know all the really undemocratic features
35:06 Speaker 04 of the American government. You know, everybody knows what needs to be changed. We need to get rid of gerrymandering. We need to reform the Senate. We need to get rid of the Electoral College. We absolutely have to get big money out of politics.
35:22 Speaker 04 When Biden came into power in 2020, the Democrats controlled all three branches of government, right? And they knew that democracy was in trouble here in the United States. And they were not able to get a single reform passed. So our democracy was no stronger after Joe Biden left office than it was beforehand. So what does that tell us? It tells us that we're not going to reform our democracy anytime soon. The Democrats either aren't able to reform it or aren't willing to reform it. And the Republicans are not going to reform it because they disproportionately benefit from the current system. So then go to the second fact, which is, you know,
36:07 Speaker 04 these identity-based politics can really create a very combustible political atmosphere. Well, I mean, maybe, right? Maybe Trump and the Republicans will increasingly reach across religious and racial lines. But then they're going to face the same problem that Democrats faced in the 1960s. If they reach and across racial and religious lines, they're going to lose a big portion of their base. And a big portion of their base are conservative whites. And a subset of that are white nationalists.
36:47 Speaker 04 So they will fight having the Republican Party have a bigger tent. So that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. So then, like, what would you do? If I was on another task force and someone said, "Okay, give us a common sense solution that we can implement now that will almost certainly have a big and quick effect." Regulate the algorithms of social media, right? Again. Like, the five biggest tech companies in the world are all American companies, and they are essentially unregulated.
37:26 Speaker 04 And we are increasingly seeing all the big negative societal effects that unregulated social media is having, not just on the American public, but on our democracy and on societies and democracies around the world. That's what I would tell our politicians. I would say, you know, have the courage to take on the tech companies. Give up the money that's pouring into your campaign coffers. Do what's right for America. Do what's right for your teenage boy. And don't allow them to basically control the minds and the limbic systems of our kids.
38:09 Speaker 04 You know, set them up for, you know, a life that will be more divided, more hate-filled, less prosperous, more violent than they would have otherwise gotten.
38:21 Scott Galloway? I think we should leave it there. Barbara F. Walters is a professor at UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy and a leading expert on civil wars, extremism, and domestic terrorism. She's the author of the New York Times bestseller, How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them. She joins us from San Diego. I just want to repeat again what you said, and it was just so obvious, it really kind of was puncturing, that if this young man had not had access to the internet, it's unlikely that he would have taken the life of a father of two and be facing a life behind bars. He could have had a much different life and not injected what is massive instability to the American experiment, you know, with one shot of a rifle.
39:06 Scott Galloway? Very much appreciate your time, Professor.
39:08 Speaker 04 Yeah, thank you very much for having me on, and thanks for your work as well.
39:22 Speaker 01 Still waiting in line? Again? That's time you'll never get back. Save time and money with stamps.com. Over 4 million businesses have skipped the line with stamps.com. Join them to save up to 90% off carrier rates from your computer or phone right now. Print postage for certified mail, registered mail, and packages in seconds. Then schedule a pickup right from your home or office. For a limited time, go to stamps.com and use code PODCAST for a free welcome gift. Taxes and fees apply.
39:52 Speaker 08 Shaq here. What's it like to buy a car from Carvana 100% online and get it delivered to your door? Let me tell you. Your car is here, Mr. Shaq. Thank you, Mr. Carvana guy. Can't wait to take it for a spin. Only the best for you, Mr. Shaq. Hey, have you always been so big, tall, and handsome? Not always. I was 6'10" once. Seven days to love it or return it, Mr. Shaq. Not that I would. You never do. No, I never do. So buy your car today on Carvana. Delivery fees may apply. See our seven-day return policy at carvana.com.
40:22 Speaker 09 Traditional home security only alerts you after a break in, and that's too late. SimpliSafe is changing that.
40:29 Speaker 10 Stop, this is SimpliSafe. Police are on the way.
40:32 Speaker 09 We don't just alert, we stop crime before it starts. SimpliSafe, plans starting around $1 a day. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at simplisafe.com/spotify or with promo code Spotify.
40:45 Speaker 11 Outdoor deterrence requires a SimpliSafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at $49.99 a month. Visit simplisafe.com/licenses for alarm license information. Tennessee 2012.
Previous No Mercy / No Malice: Own Goal Next Women Who Out-Earn Their Partners, Trump’s War on Science, and Managing Depression Page updated September 28, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
