Introducing Decoder with Nilay Patel: Mark Cuban on the future of American business

This is the first episode of Nilay Patel's new podcast Decoder, an interview show that will put a spotlight on how innovators and policymakers at the frontiers of business and technology are navigating an ever-changing landscape. On the first episode of Decoder, Nilay interviews Mark Cuban. Mark is the owner of the Dallas Mavericks, he’s a tech investor, and is on the hit show, Shark Tank. The conversation, recorded as last week’s election results rolled in, covers how interwoven business, technology, and policy are, whether its 5G, or the NBA bubble, or AI, or his investments into healthcare -- if you want to understand the landscape of the future, you have to understand tech, you have to understand business, and you have to understand policy. You can subscribe to Decoder anywhere you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Nilay Patel?

  Hey everybody, it's Neelai from the Vergecast. On this episode of the, wait, that's not right. We took the Vergecast interview episodes, we made them bigger and better, and we turned them into a new show called Decoder with Neelai Patel. That's launching now. You can go subscribe to it wherever you get your podcasts. But we're going to run the first few episodes in the Vergecast feed to promote it, give you a sense of what it's like. So check it out. This is the first episode of Decoder. My guest, Mark Cuban.

• 0:28Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by On Investing, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Each week, hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Colin Martin, head of fixed income research and strategy for the Schwab Center for Financial Research, bring you fresh insights on what's happening in the markets and why, and what the implications might be for your portfolio. Join Colin and Lizanne as they explore questions like, how do you evaluate corporate bonds that look interesting? And what sectors are on the move right now? Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com/oninvesting, or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 1:13Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by On Investing, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Each week, hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Colin Martin, head of fixed income research and strategy for the Schwab Center for Financial Research, bring you fresh insights on what's happening in the markets and why, and what the implications might be for your portfolio. Join Colin and Lizanne as they explore questions like, how do you evaluate corporate bonds that look interesting? And what sectors are on the move right now? Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com/oninvesting, or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 1:58Nilay Patel?

  Hello and welcome to the first episode of Decoder. I'm Neelai Patel, editor in chief of The Verge, and Decoder is my new podcast about big ideas and other problems. I'll be interviewing executives, policymakers, academics, and some other assorted troublemakers about what it takes to build the businesses of the future. I've spent over a decade covering tech, and I am more convinced than ever that every business is a tech business with some familiar problems to solve and some big new opportunities to seize. So I'm very excited that my first interview on Decoder is with Mark Cuban. Mark is the owner of the Dallas Mavericks. He's a tech investor, and yeah, he's on Shark Tank.

• 2:34Speaker 02

  Rejoice, Shark Tank nation, rejoice.

• 2:39Nilay Patel?

  Now, Mark and I have known each other for a little while, and one of the reasons I was excited to have him as my first guest is because we disagree on some things, and we enjoy disagreeing with each other. One of my goals with this show is to have my own beliefs challenged, and Mark is pretty good at challenging your beliefs. We recorded this conversation just after it had become clear that Joe Biden would win the presidential election, and we talked about what it's going to take to build a new future. Pay close attention to how interwoven business, technology, and policy are in this conversation. It didn't matter if we were talking about 5G, or the NBA bubble, or AI, or Mark's investments into healthcare. If you want to understand the landscape of the future, you have to understand tech, you have to understand business, and you have to understand policy. That's why I was so excited for Mark to be the first guest on Decoder.

• 3:24Nilay Patel?

  There is also a pretty good story about meeting Donald Trump. All right, here we go.

• 3:40Nilay Patel?

  Mark Cuban, welcome to Decoder.

• 3:42Speaker 02

  What's up?

• 3:43Nilay Patel?

  You're my first guest. It's like an honor. I'm so happy it's you.

• 3:47Speaker 02

  Yeah, well, if you can't get anybody else, I'm what's left.

• 3:50Nilay Patel?

  How are you feeling about, I mean, even obviously very vocal about the Trump presidency and what he has stood for. How are you feeling about a potential Biden presidency?

• 3:59Speaker 02

  It depends what happens with the Senate, right? A big part of me thinks it'll be better to have a Republican Senate, believe it or not, because I think the retribution that would come from Schumer to be Mitch McConnell's twin would be a negative for the country.

• 4:16Nilay Patel?

  I saw a couple of notes from banks. I've seen the markets today. That seems to be, I saw one note from a bank that was saying a Republican Senate would be great for business. We would have sort of regulatory stagnation.

• 4:27Speaker 02

  We've lost our form of government. You know, we don't pick the best candidates. You know, I don't think anybody's here to say that Joe Biden and Donald Trump were the best and brightest that this country has to offer, or even out of the primaries from either party. And we, you know, we are now seeing the downside of having a political duopoly. And when a party gets power, they put power first and they get in their head that they're able to take control and use that power. And that's a problem for the country.

• 5:01Nilay Patel?

  One of the things with the Trump era that I always thought was, it was like the elephant in the room, is that Donald Trump was not an effective bureaucrat. Like, he didn't know how his own machine worked.

• 5:11Speaker 02

  Right.

• 5:11Nilay Patel?

  And so it was just chaos all the time. He would say, I would go on CNBC once a week and they'd be like, Trump said he's gonna bang TikTok. And I'd be like, no, he's not. He doesn't know what he's talking about.

• 5:19Speaker 02

  He does. He never does. But it doesn't matter.

• 5:22Nilay Patel?

  But you don't think that, I mean, on one timeline, Joe Biden is a creature of the government. He might be more effective at doing stuff. On another timeline, you might get someone really Trumpy who knows what to do.

• 5:32Speaker 02

  So to your point, right? So if the Republicans get the Senate, then Joe Biden has to be Joe Biden and tries to bring, have to bring things together. And that's a positive, right? But think about what happens when one party has both sides. It doesn't matter what Joe Biden thinks, right? You know, it wasn't like Mitch McConnell was taking guidance from Donald Trump on any legislative issue.

• 5:54Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 5:55Speaker 02

  On any policy whatsoever. And I don't know, you know, and it's not like Nancy Pelosi was talking to Joe Biden and saying, what do you think? Or Chuck Schumer was saying, what do you think? I really want to know what Joe Biden has to say before anything came out. Look at stimulus. We need stimulus. This economy needs stimulus. People are dying. People are starving and they're arguing about money for, you know, charities in Washington DC. You know, it's just ridiculous, the things that they're arguing about.

• 6:24Nilay Patel?

  Right. So let's talk about, we got, there's a pandemic. I want, you know, the NBA came through the bubble very successfully. The NFL seems to be a little less successful at it. There is stimulus that's needed in the economy. Then there's a massive set of accelerating trends. Things people saw coming for a long time that are just real now. And then there's actual real change that would have never happened on any timeline. Right. The one I always think of is like 2.2 million women have left the workplace over the past year. Of all of that, let's start with the NBA because that's obviously, you own the Mavs. You got through it. The NBA in this moment, obviously there was a lot of social activism with the NBA. The bubble was a, just kind of a remarkable success

• 7:08Nilay Patel?

  that it happened and was, you were able to pull it off. But that blending, there was, there's always been a blending of sort of entertainment in sports, of culture in sports. That's the heart of it. Now there's this, a real blend of politics. There's a lot of criticism that the league got more political, that your ratings were down. How do you, do you think that swings back into balance? Or is that, is that here to stay?

• 7:27Speaker 02

  Two things. One, sports and politics have always mixed. Jesse Owens, Muhammad Ali. I mean, my guy, when he became Muhammad Ali, he wasn't allowed to fight for two years because he wouldn't go to Vietnam because the Vietcong had done nothing to him, as he said, right? You know, the 1980 Olympics, John Carlos, you know, holding their arms up in protest. And going forward, it just, it's always happened. So it's not like, you know, sports and culture and politics weren't intertwined. It's not like President, you know, Richard Nixon didn't want to call a play for the Washington Redskins.

• 8:02Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, but you're talking about stars, right? In the, in the, in the finals, like every NBA player has a, has a social message on the back of their jersey. That's a different, I don't think the median athlete in any pro league felt comfortable before.

• 8:13Speaker 02

  In 1980, athletes did not go to the Olympics.

• 8:16Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 8:17Speaker 02

  You know, I mean, but I get your point, right? But part two to that is Joe Biden won the election, you know, and I think there's a real feeling of accomplishment that, who knows how big an influence or how small an influence, but there was influence. And I think that, that is going to be rewarding to a lot of people within the NBA.

• 8:36Nilay Patel?

  Yeah. So you think it's here to stay?

• 8:38Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think it depends on the circumstances, right? When you have a broken political system with candidates that people are either not in love with or hate, you're going to get activism. You know, if you have problems, and again, let me, let me take one step back. Activism to end racism is not being political.

• 8:56Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 8:56Speaker 02

  You know, that's an American ideal. If you're not trying to, to support the end of racism or do things to end racism, that's un-American. It's not about being an activist. That should be part of our daily lives. If we see it, say something or do something or, you know, be anything but, you know? And so I, but I do think that we will see, when there's challenges, there'll be increased confidence to try to have an impact.

• 9:20Nilay Patel?

  So as you think about the NBA coming out of this, obviously there's some discussion on when the season will start again. There's some discussion about how to obviously reset that business. What do you think that you've learned from the bubble and operating in the pandemic that will persist into the next version of the NBA?

• 9:36Speaker 02

  We shot season 12 of Shark Tank Friday nights on ABC.

• 9:39Nilay Patel?

  Good plug, Mark.

• 9:40Speaker 02

  Yeah, you know that. But we did it, we shot in the bubble in the Venetian in Vegas. And one of the things that was underlying it all was there are hundreds of people who work on the set and work on the production, whose livelihoods depended on this. And the same thing applied with, with the NBA. We realized, the players realized what was at stake and how important it was to so many people. And that made it important to them. And that encouraged them to follow the rules, not that they wouldn't otherwise, but it really, you know, made everybody very specific in everything that they did and very considerate. So, you know, I think what we learned from that was if you give people a reason to do the right thing, they will, right? If you communicate honestly with people to do the right thing, they will.

• 10:25Speaker 02

  When you let people know what's at stake, they'll do the right thing. But it takes leadership and it takes communication. We had leadership with Adam Silver. We had leadership with, you know, the National Basketball Station Players Association, right? The MBPA. And you had LeBron James, Chris Paul, Dwight Powell, et cetera, Kyle Lowry, Andre Iguodala, people who stepped up and communicated to their membership. And you need that leadership in order to get the results that we got.

• 10:52Nilay Patel?

  Why do you think it's going less well with the NFL? I mean, I'm a Packers fan. They were just like out of running backs yesterday.

• 10:58Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, two reasons. One, there's just a lot more people.

• 11:01Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 11:01Speaker 02

  You know, we had 17 person roster, you know, 37 people in a traveling party. There's 53 people on an NFL roster, plus the traveling party. And they're traveling. We weren't. So the challenges are just going to be unreal. They sleep in their own beds at night. We didn't.

• 11:15Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 11:15Speaker 02

  You know, just getting that all executed on is very, very difficult. And they deserve credit for having gotten it having gone as well as it has.

• 11:24Nilay Patel?

  Do you think when you come back to the NBA regular season, you'll be able to to pull it off? Once you have travel it?

• 11:30Speaker 02

  Yeah, we're gonna try. I think so. Again, but it's easier for us because we have fewer people that we have to deal with.

• 11:35Nilay Patel?

  Coming out of that, I talked about things that we saw accelerating. Work from home is one of those things. E commerce is one of those things. What are the trends that you're surprised by?

• 11:45Speaker 02

  I mean, from the technology perspective, none really. But from a libertarian perspective, that it's been as dramatic as it has been. The I refuse to wear a mask group.

• 11:55Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 11:55Speaker 02

  That surprised me more than anything. I thought people would, you know, would not politicize it nearly as much that it was an opportunity for us to come together. You saw some of that at the beginning and yeah, we can blame it on Donald Trump, but still, you know, it's just people just not wearing masks at the expense of their own families to try to prove a point. I just didn't see that coming.

• 12:14Nilay Patel?

  Do you think that the, I know you're very critical of Facebook and the other social networks. Do you think that they're they're responding to that appropriately now? But they obviously amplified a lot of that message.

• 12:22Speaker 02

  Yeah, particularly Facebook. Facebook's a disaster.

• 12:25Nilay Patel?

  But I mean, during specific this interminable election week, we've seen the major social networks to varying degrees, get more aggressive. Do you think that that's going to hold?

• 12:35Speaker 02

  Right, the problem, they're trying to, again, deal with symptoms, not, you know, the problem they created. It's almost like TikTok creates dance and music virility. Facebook lives for political virility, you know, and that's a problem. And, you know, you can argue that Mark Zuckerberg doesn't have that responsibility that you want to know who the idiots are. And they're held front and center, right? But on balance, when you look at what's best for the American people, it's been it's been horrific. It's been a disaster.

• 13:05Nilay Patel?

  You know, we talked about maybe. Maybe Congress will do things in a Biden administration, maybe we won't get legislation. Up until now, there has been sort of bipartisan criticism of Facebook, all the way to we should break it up. Do you think that that kind of remedy actually solves the problem? Or is this a leadership problem?

• 13:23Speaker 02

  Breaking it up doesn't solve it because it's all about algorithmic amplification is the problem, right? So you're putting somebody effectively with Facebook, you're putting someone in a room and putting speakers all around the room and reeducating them.

• 13:38Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 13:39Speaker 02

  It's like Facebook camp, you know, where whatever bubble you're in, that bubble is being thrown at you continuously and in a reeducation process that you may or may not have asked for. Now you may choose to stay there because you always do have the right to leave. And that was always my perspective originally. You don't have to be on Facebook, right? You're not getting something you're not asking for. But they've become reeducation camps. And that's a problem.

• 14:03Nilay Patel?

  No, I hear from a lot of people who say, we actually can't leave Facebook, right? And I think with Twitter, it's like you can Twitter's small, you know, it's 22% of the American public interacts with Twitter. And then by the numbers, it's actually only one in 10 Americans.

• 14:15Speaker 02

  Right. And 8% of the people create 92% of the tweets.

• 14:18Nilay Patel?

  I just feel like the answer for Twitter is like, yeah, we're censoring everybody. We're putting labels all over everything. Quit if you don't like it.

• 14:25Speaker 02

  Yeah, Twitter, you know, because people come onto Twitter to yell.

• 14:29Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 14:29Speaker 02

  Right? You don't really have, and you know, most of them have, you know, crazy profile pictures and don't use their real name. And so you don't have to take them seriously. On Facebook, they're your friends, your family, they're people you know 90% of the time. And so that just has a different impact on you, you know? And so, you know, one of my kids' parents, you know, going on there saying, you know, the election's being stolen, or, you know, Joe Biden has dementia, or the Democrats are leading to communism and will be Venezuela within four years. And then three of their friends come in and say, you're right, you're right, you're right. That's a different conversation than Patriot 462, you know, that's been on since, you know, July of 2020, saying Cuban, you're a communist.

• 15:14Nilay Patel?

  Yeah. It's funny that sometimes I think I have bad mentions, but before I came on, I went and looked at your Twitter feed. I'm like, oh, this is a different scale of a problem. But Facebook is really, you know, it's wound itself into people's lives. It's your friends are there. They have multiple interlocking products that you might be interested in.

• 15:30Speaker 02

  It's a lot older, right?

• 15:32Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 15:32Speaker 02

  And not a debt, you know, so, and those people are more susceptible. It's like Fox News does its damage. Facebook does even worse damage because it gets reinforced by people you actually know that are in your physical, your life bubble, in addition to just being on some, you know, wide social media net that you really don't know the people and they're abstract. Facebook's not abstract and that's the huge difference.

• 15:55Nilay Patel?

  What I'm getting to here is solving that problem. You don't think breaking them up and making them compete would work?

• 16:01Speaker 02

  No, because, so if there's Facebook one and Facebook two.

• 16:05Nilay Patel?

  They're both gonna be the same, you think?

• 16:06Speaker 02

  The same thing, right? Because, you know, and it doesn't make it any easier to control them because they're a smaller company. As a matter of fact, you might ignore them more and it gets worse.

• 16:15Nilay Patel?

  So, do you think, the other option, which I think of is sort of the Josh Hawley option, is we'll make Facebook a regulated monopoly.

• 16:23Speaker 02

  And do what?

• 16:24Nilay Patel?

  You'll carve away section 230, the law that says platforms aren't liable for what users publish. You'll do algorithmic transparency. You'll make them audit every content moderation decision they make.

• 16:33Speaker 02

  Yeah, that stuff, right. But I do agree with what Roger McNamee said, and I take it even further.

• 16:37Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 16:38Speaker 02

  You know, he said to dismiss 230 for anything that is negative, that negative algorithmic amplification. I think you get rid of 230 for any content that has seen any algorithmic amplification. Once you're amplifying it, you're making editorial decisions.

• 16:55Nilay Patel?

  Mm hmm.

• 16:55Speaker 02

  Right? Doesn't matter if it's automated, right? Because you, someone had to build the automation and incorporate, you know, build those weights and balances. And so, once you start amplifying it, regardless of how you got there, now you're a publisher. You're making choices on what content to present to people. You know, you're making choices that, you know, this person leans right, and so I'm gonna keep on giving them more and his friends lean right. So they're all in this bubble and they, you know, this particular type of content, again, it's no different than TikTok. What TikTok's brilliant about is, you know, if my, if I watch basketball videos, they know I'm watching basketball videos. It doesn't matter who I follow.

• 17:32Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 17:33Speaker 02

  Right. They just know. And so they keep on funneling to Facebook does the exact same thing and incorporates politics into that as well by the because that's the nature of Facebook. You know, you're going to get that political commentary and news and videos and all that. So if you're amplifying any content, I don't care if it's Dallas Mavericks content because it's, you know, all Dallas Mavericks fans know 230 protections.

• 17:57Nilay Patel?

  I see what you're saying. 230 is designed to help people moderate to incentivize the platform to pull things down. You're proposing, and I've heard this from Roger in the past as well. You're proposing if you amplify, you make it bigger than it could have been on its own. But where do you measure that?

• 18:11Speaker 02

  You don't have to measure it. Either you do it or you don't. So either you're you get content in chronological order or you get it even in algorithmic defined order from people you follow, period and story.

• 18:24Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 18:25Speaker 02

  Social network and supposed to be social. So if you and I have a conspiracy theory discussion and the people that follow us see it, you know, or in a group we're in, so be it, right? But if you amplify it, so the conversation that my wife's friend finds its way to you because the algorithms know that you're interested in this type of content, but you have no idea who this other person is, the parent of my kid, you know, of my kid's friend. That's a choice to deliver and you deserve no 230 protections at all. And if that doesn't work, then you look at going back to, okay, we're not going to make you moderate everything other than the way we moderate now. But we're going to let make you go back to the old school social network where you get based off of your followers.

• 19:08Nilay Patel?

  So a thing that strikes me at that, and I think this is why I'm particularly interested in talking to you about it. That is a pretty heavy handed regulatory scheme and maybe the government's too broken to ever figure it out and pass it. But you're now getting in there and you're designing the architecture of the platform.

• 19:23Speaker 02

  I don't think it's heavy handed because the heavy handed was with 230. Right? Because prior to 2:30

• 19:28Nilay Patel?

  I disagree.

• 19:29Speaker 02

  So let me finish then.

• 19:30Nilay Patel?

  Okay.

• 19:30Speaker 02

  Prior to 2:30, like when we were doing broadcast.com and audio and any piece of content that I had put on there, I had to have a license for. Period and story.

• 19:38Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, but so you're saying because of 2:30, they've been able to create moderation decisions that they're not liable for. Right? Like they they get to make whatever kinds of moderation.

• 19:48Speaker 02

  Their marketing decisions, right? Their marketing decisions and you don't go, you can't put something on CNN. And let's just say this is user based content every day at 3:00 PM. We randomly pick something from the internet. And we ask you if you want to put it on CNN. They have to get a license before they put that on CNN. Right? They're not going to have platform 230 protection that I'm aware of. Maybe I'm wrong. Right? Because that protection doesn't hold to broadcast than your television bits or bits. Why should they be treated differently?

• 20:16Nilay Patel?

  Right? I think there is a very narrow, boring answer or arguments we had about that and what the broadcasters are able to do with user content from other platforms. But here it seems like the challenge is we're going to change the incentives for how Facebook runs its moderation system. Right? And so we're going to take away 230 protection. If you amplify it, you're hoping that that one incentive change actually changes how they operate.

• 20:40Speaker 02

  We're simplifying them, right? Because a lot of their moderation comes from the negative impact of their amplification. Right? So when you put everybody in the education camps and they all get Stockholm syndrome and all started agreeing on on everything. Right? Now you potentially have a problem that needs to be moderated. So you saw that what was the one that the group they just shut down?

• 21:04Nilay Patel?

  Stop the steal.

• 21:05Speaker 02

  Stop the steal. Yeah. So now you have all these people coming together and now they have a moderation issue. Right? Now, how do all those people come to commonality in the first place? It's not like they all follow each other.

• 21:16Nilay Patel?

  So this is what groups you're recommending, what videos you're recommending beyond just what your friends are retweeting.

• 21:22Speaker 02

  You caused the problem through, you know, the way you define to define your algorithms. And look, the whole nature of neural networks is they're going to start not thinking for themselves, but you know, when you neural networks are a black box at their base. Right? You can't just go back in and First engineer and just tweak one thing it for a lot of applications. Right. And so it's not as simple as saying, okay, we're going to moderate your algorithm. So A, B, or C doesn't have, that's heavy handed because you have to anticipate the outcome. And then turn, you know, track it back to where you think that it initiated. Right. Versus is just saying, look, be a social network. Keep out terrorism, keep out, you know, all the things, no titties. Right. And you've done your job.

• 22:02Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, I just, the what I, what I was getting at is, yep, that's one way to do it. Isn't the other way to do it to make somehow make the market more competitive? That's what I worry about, right? It's, it's, it's strange that you and I are on different ends of that. Right. Because what we, what you and I often argue about is like net neutrality. Where I'm like, the market's not competitive, regulate the hell out of them. And here we flipped.

• 22:23Speaker 02

  No, here's the problem, right? The problem is with AI, there's AI haves and AI have nots.

• 22:29Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 22:29Speaker 02

  Tik Tok is amazing because their AI is better than anybody. That's what accelerated it. And it took them being part of ByteDance and spending hundreds of million, billions of dollars to get there. Right. Parler tried to compete with Twitter. Right. Many people have tried to compete with Facebook over the years. Right. But it's good, it's going to be very, very difficult to give the quality of of result back in terms of your interaction with any platform. Because it's hard and expensive and time consuming to do AI right. And we already, so when you look at the stock market and you look at the companies who are just crushing it at the top. There are all the companies that are the greatest in the world at AI. No exceptions. Any 500 billion, one trillion dollar or more market cap company.

• 23:12Speaker 02

  All of them do AI incredibly well and have spent these hundreds, if not billions of dollars. Hundreds of millions, if not billions. That's where the game is today. In terms of AI, we've got, there's just a limited scope of people, of companies that can truly compete. Because this whole conversation we're having, the foundation of Facebook's success is artificial intelligence. Right?

• 23:35Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 23:35Speaker 02

  True with that?

• 23:36Nilay Patel?

  I mean, to, to an extent, I think there's a big network effect. I think there's a high switching cost.

• 23:40Speaker 02

  Well, yeah, there's a high switching cost, but the network effect, early days, that was network effect. Now there's that amplification we're talking about because if the amplification wasn't impactful, we wouldn't be having that part of the conversation.

• 23:51Nilay Patel?

  Well, so let me ask you this a question another way. This is something I'm thinking about a lot. And I'm curious for your read on it. I look at Google Search, which we know is a good business. It prints money for Google and no one has built a good competitor to it. I think, I think Microsoft just keeps being around because they don't want to admit that they, that all their users are going to switch to Google, right? But why hasn't anyone, why hasn't Apple built a competitor to Google Search?

• 24:18Speaker 02

  For the same reason I just told you.

• 24:19Nilay Patel?

  Because they don't have the AI chops to do it.

• 24:20Speaker 02

  Right. You don't think, you know, Microsoft doesn't just keep being around because they don't want to be embarrassed because they need to enhance their AI. If Microsoft made a quantum leap in AI, they could make a quantum leap above and beyond Google for their search.

• 24:36Nilay Patel?

  But I feel like it's the same with YouTube. But YouTube is a much simpler kind of product, right?

• 24:41Speaker 02

  No.

• 24:42Nilay Patel?

  You don't think so?

• 24:42Speaker 02

  No. I mean, again, what are you feeding people?

• 24:45Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 24:46Speaker 02

  The underpinning of every conversation we just have had in terms of success and failure and competition is artificial intelligence. And the bigger, the biggest challenge we have, and I say this all the time, is we have companies that are AI haves and AI have nots. And what's Google's doing with search is not anti-trust. They're just better at AI than most companies. That's all.

• 25:05Nilay Patel?

  So, look, you're Shark Tank, season 12, you just filmed it, right? Like, you're an investor, someone comes up to you and says, hey, everybody in the YouTube ecosystem is always mad. The, the inflection point for every YouTube creator is a video explaining why they're mad at YouTube. It's just, that's the end of their timeline. We're going to build a better product for them. Are you going to say, well, what's your AI? Is that your first response?

• 25:30Speaker 02

  Three, three years ago, I looked at companies, I invested in one that just didn't work, right?

• 25:34Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 25:34Speaker 02

  But today, yes, absolutely. And I get all these people come and say, oh, we've got great AI. I get this guy from MIT, this guy from Harvard, he's leading this, leading PhD. So what?

• 25:44Nilay Patel?

  As you step back and look at that investing landscape, what's your, what's your decision making framework? Is the first, is the first cut, tell me about your AI and let me validate it? Or is that three steps down the line?

• 25:54Speaker 02

  Lately, if you're trying to sell me on AI, I'm probably telling you, you're not really doing AI and you can't do what you think you want to do.

• 26:02Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 26:02Speaker 02

  But it's expensive. So if they get a hundred thousand dollars in AWS credits or Azure credits or Google Cloud and they blow through that and now all of a sudden they don't realize how much money they're going to have to spend. And you know, because running all these models and trying to make it all work together is not only expensive, it's time consuming and it's hard. And then you've got to get the results because just because you do it in an AI, doesn't mean the results are going to be impactful the way you want them to be. You could spend a billion dollars on an AI search engine project and it's not going to be near as good unless you just get just these rocket science people, right? That are just beyond the best of what Google and Microsoft and Amazon and Facebook have and Apple and

• 26:47Speaker 02

  Twitter have, right? You're going to need to find those, those anecdotal people, right? Those, those people that are outliers, these outliers that are just beyond the intelligence of what these major companies have, then maybe you have a chance.

• 27:01Nilay Patel?

  Do you think the, the kill zone is real? Like I hear from small companies all the time. Look, there's a kill zone. We can make something better than what Google has today, but they will see it as a feature and they will eat us. So we'll never get funded.

• 27:14Speaker 02

  Well, no, I mean, that's not a kill zone. I mean, forever and a day, you know, I've always asked the question, are you a product or a feature?

• 27:19Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 27:20Speaker 02

  Right? So that's always been an issue and you're always competing, you know, 50, 60 years ago, they were competing with IBM, that Microsoft, you're always competing with. Now then Google, then Facebook, it's just, you know, that's just the nature of the beast. But there's not really the kill zone from a product perspective, because most people don't try to go head to head for their primary products. There's just no good reason to. You know, you can't any more than going to head to head with Tesla has been hard. Why do you think Tesla has been so dominant in EV? I mean, because Elon Musk is smart as fuck and his technology always, he always comes out with things. What makes you think? Why didn't I think of that?

• 27:57Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 27:58Speaker 02

  And then not only does he make you think that, then he executes on it. So he went from competing with every major car manufacturer, who and everybody who invested in and probably said, "Okay, I'm taking a risk, but you're probably out of your mind. There's no chance." And he changed the game, right? So it's not like it's not capable of happening, but you need five Elon Mus together that have, you know, Elon Musk says he's going to do the Boring Machine and he does it. He says he's going to do a space rocket that lands again and he does it, right? A recyclable space rocket. You need that type of person.

• 28:31Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 28:31Speaker 02

  In order to beat people at their own game when they've been doing it for 20 years. Google's not a startup. Facebook's not a startup. Netflix is not a startup. Apple's not a startup. Microsoft's not a startup. These guys have been doing it for a generation. And so you've got to come with your A game. And that's not to say there aren't some people out there that are just fucking unbelievable and can blow everybody away. There are, but they know it. And they're working on a vaccine, right? Working on creating things that aren't about search. Because if you're trying to change the world and you are the best of the best of the best in AI, the last motherfucking thing you're working on is search.

• 29:09Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, because it looks like a solved problem with no entry.

• 29:12Speaker 02

  And not even that there's no entry. Let's say you do it better than Google. Yeah, you can make money, but you, you know, particularly Gen Z, that's not the goal. You know, making money is a byproduct, changing the world for the better. That's the goal. And that's the beauty of Gen Z. And that's why I'm really hopeful about this country, because that's their mission. They all have a social construct of what they're trying to accomplish. You know, so breaking up Facebook, you're just going to have two companies doing the same thing, or three.

• 29:36Nilay Patel?

  I mean, if you think Facebook is too big, you and I have talked to each other for years about telecom companies. And I've always thought those are too consolidated and we're kind of seeing it now. 5G is launched. It's here. There's a PC mag story that came out today. The United States has the slowest 5G in the world. Hopefully it'll inch up better. We have seen kind of the AT&T consolidation. They own Warner. Seems like they're making big changes. Jason Kallars and you see Warner Media sweeping through it. A bunch of HBO people are gone. We'll see what happens to CNN after the election. Rumors there. Do you think their eyes are still on the prize? Do you think the big telecoms are distracted? Because it feels like they're all over the place.

• 30:13Speaker 02

  Yeah, they are because, you know, they they hope for linear television to last longer than it did and it didn't. But they're still where they're making their money is selling broadband. And well, they'll make more money is selling by 5G. But you also have to realize, and I'm not the expert in here in terms of the technology for 5G, but Huawei was the leading provider and low cost provider. And now all of a sudden, it was gone. Right. And then there were different decisions made on millimeter wave and what was the best approach. And, you know, it's happening. It's not happening as quickly as people would like, or the quality is not necessarily there the way people would like. But I don't think there's any question now. And I think I told you this when we talked, that, you know, 5G will replace wired broadband.

• 30:51Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 30:51Speaker 02

  And then 6G will replace whatever, you know, comes along there.

• 30:55Nilay Patel?

  I think by the time this will come out, I can say this out loud, but this, here's the 12 Pro Max. Right now, I'm in rural America. I have two bars of 5G. It is not fast enough to replace my wired broadband here. So I think the curve for that is going to take a long time.

• 31:09Speaker 02

  Well, but you're a year in.

• 31:11Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 31:11Speaker 02

  Right. So it might not happen to you immediately. But, you know, the minute I can put a 5G Wi-Fi in my house, because I have a decent 5G signal, done.

• 31:21Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 31:22Speaker 02

  Done. And places I travel where I know that there's 5G instead of using wired, you know, Wi-Fi from a hotel, done. Right. I'm doing it. And so they don't have a choice but to compete. And that was also my always my thing to you, right? Because, you know, it was always localized or territorial at some level with telecom. And that territorial perspective is is being decimated right now.

• 31:44Nilay Patel?

  But it's being decimated, but there's still only three national carriers. Are you are you hoping to see more like regional 5G competition?

• 31:52Speaker 02

  Not even that, even with three, because the spectrum, that's going to be hard, right?

• 31:56Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 31:56Speaker 02

  But but even with three, that's three more, that's two more than what you were talking about when we had our conversation.

• 32:04Nilay Patel?

  Fair. How do you think the, you were talking about linear TV going away. You obviously, that's a big deal for sports. It's the last thing holding linear TV together in many ways. You are seeing, especially with AT&T, the bundle of content and access. T-Mobile just launched a TV service. That is, in some ways to me, like, that's the net neutrality moment, right? AT&T is going to zero rate HBO Max. T-Mobile's cable-ish thing, T-Vision, is going to be prioritized in that network. If the only thing holding all that together is sports, where do you come in and play?

• 32:38Speaker 02

  I mean, it's hard to say. I don't have a good answer for you. I really don't. It's something I'm still learning and still trying to figure out. I don't have a good answer.

• 32:47Nilay Patel?

  What have your conversations been like?

• 32:48Speaker 02

  Trying to find that equilibrium. You know, how do we disrupt ourselves? How do we, you know, how do we sustain our partners and do the right thing for our customers? You know, you can't just always maximize revenue. You gotta look, you know, it's not just short-term. You gotta look long-term. And so trying to figure out what our options are, that's part of the challenge, you know?

• 33:05Nilay Patel?

  Have you thought about going direct? NBA?

• 33:07Speaker 02

  More, but you know, it's gonna be expensive, right?

• 33:10Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 33:10Speaker 02

  We also have partners, you know, the, and the Players Association isn't just all of a sudden going to say, let's reduce our revenue by X. That's already happened with the pandemic, right? So we don't, you know, that's your problem five years from now, but, you know, the life cycle of a player is 4.5 years.

• 33:26Nilay Patel?

  So you, you know, like, the idea of Netflix for NBA where anybody wants to watch the NBA, pays the fee and you've got the app and it all lives inside of there. You don't think that's workable? I don't think it's workable, but I hear people ask about it all the time.

• 33:38Speaker 02

  Yeah, no, everybody asks about it all the time. It's trying to find that equilibrium, right? Because you have to deal with all the stakeholders and, you know, including the players. We split our revenue 50/50 with the players. And so it's not, it's not a unilateral decision and it's not just a technical decision. Technically, it's easy. That's not a problem at all.

• 33:55Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 33:56Speaker 02

  You know, it's more, you know, what do our customers want? When do they want it? How do they want it? And where do they want it?

• 34:02Nilay Patel?

  But do you think having three, let's say 5G works and the Time Warner Cable monopoly in New York City is finally decimated and everyone's getting wireless access and they have a much choice. Now you've got three providers who might say, well, unless you pay us an access fee to our network.

• 34:18Speaker 02

  No, I mean, because look, Wi-Fi is not going away and we can still go wired and there's still a variety of options. So yeah, I'm not, that's the last thing I'm worried about because the one thing that would really, you know, again, particularly with the younger generation with that social construct that we talked about earlier.

• 34:33Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 34:33Speaker 02

  If you're that brand that does that, say goodbye to every customer you have ever had or ever will have. You just can't get away with that anymore. It's not 20 years ago where, you know, you can have any color you want as long as it's black. You know, those days are gone. You know, every, every individual, every Gen Z, every millennial for the most part is a brand. And if you happen to be that fuck you telecom provider and no one's going to want to be on that, you know, telecom provider, you're going to, your brand is going to be toast.

• 35:04Nilay Patel?

  I'm watching these sort of like new look reverse carriage disputes play out in sort of tangential ways where HBO Max isn't on Roku, stuff like that. It is happening, right? I mean, Roku is basically saying, pay, if you want to be on this platform, we're the biggest, pay up.

• 35:19Speaker 02

  And I mean, real estate is always your value, right? But.

• 35:22Nilay Patel?

  Right. But it's not driving people to switch away from Roku's yet.

• 35:24Speaker 02

  Yeah, but Roku is, is not, you know, it's us or nothing.

• 35:27Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 35:28Speaker 02

  You don't have to use Roku. A lot of people don't and most, a lot of people don't even know what Roku is, you know, and there's no territorial limitations. Oh, you live in Dallas, you have to use Roku or you don't use Roku. It's, hey, we're marketing, we're getting out there, we're marketing nationally, globally, and we're convincing these customers. And if you want to get to those customers, pay me. Okay. You know, it's not, we have this bandwidth, we're one of three 5G providers and pay us to be on here. And look, let me take a step back. The original conversation that we had was based off of websites, right? Because that, that's the whole net neutrality thing. You know, websites aren't going to be able to get access, which has all turned out to be fantasy and nonsense, right? There's

• 36:08Speaker 02

  never been, you know, five examples, maybe over a year, the past 12 years, maybe 15 now, of companies that have been tamped down, right? And those weren't even company specific type things, you know? So this is not a website issue anymore. And most of what you're talking about in terms of streaming and access is website or app driven. And so you're not, you know, I don't see anybody limiting apps, you know, no, no, you know, you're, you're on Google. Now, Google and Apple, that's a different conversation, right? The limits they have, but I don't think from a telecom perspective, I, I haven't seen anything to even suggest that that's a possibility.

• 36:47Nilay Patel?

  Well, to me, the, it's not, it's the consolidation, to just come back to that theme over and over again. It's AT&T, one day will zero rate CNN and charge Fox News for access. You might think that's a great thing. I, I see that as like a particular kind of power.

• 37:03Speaker 02

  No, and I get it, right? But remember how Fox News got started. They paid for, they paid for sub, 10 bucks a sub per month, right? Um, because when bandwidth was limited, you had to pay to get access. And so I just don't, I don't see it happening that way because the competition comes from another direction. You know, you're not, the, the bandwidth is, isn't necessarily going to be, bandwidth right now is, the cost is becoming negligible, you know? And so there's so many different ways to deliver bits, you know, whether they're video or anything else for that matter. It's just not going to happen, right? There's so many different ways and someone could put up a private 5G network. You know, there's just, where someone will just sell off spectrum and, you know, just do it, you know, within

• 37:45Speaker 02

  a small area. Like we're seeing 5G networks within manufacturing environments.

• 37:50Nilay Patel?

  We're going to take a quick break, but stick around. Mark and I are going to talk about his decision-making frameworks and the projects he's working on now.

• 38:01Speaker 03

  Real innovation is powered by real people. This is AMEX Corporate. Trusted experts, smarter technology, 24/7 dedicated support from day one to answer questions, help set up policies and approvals, and consult on spend capacity as your business needs evolve. Plus, on-demand resources help level up operations at every stage. That's the trusted service you've come to expect. Built to simplify, designed to scale. This is AMEX Corporate.

• 38:33Speaker 04

  Your heart can tell you a lot about your health. Apple Watch Series 12 measures your heart rate every five seconds with the most accurate heart rate sensing and wearable. So your vitals app, now with heart rate variability, can tell you when something is off. And your readiness score can let you know when to rest and when to push. Hear the story in every heartbeat with Apple Watch Series 12. The features described are for wellness purposes only and not for medical use. iPhone 11 or later required. Based on Apple conducted study of heart rate accuracy, August 2026. Visit apple.com slash Apple Watch Series 12.

• 39:04Nilay Patel?

  We're back. One of the themes that you're going to hear about on Decoder a lot is decision making. I am very curious how people make decisions and the frameworks they use to make lots of decisions at once. We've all seen Mark's decision making happen on Shark Tank, that's one part of it, but I wanted to know what his larger approach is.

• 39:22Speaker 02

  So Shark Tank's a TV show.

• 39:23Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 39:23Speaker 02

  Right? So I have, I have an infrastructure in my time where I can help a lot of these companies just become bigger and better. And I'm helping entrepreneurs and I'm teaching people to be entrepreneurs. And, and these people that come on the show and present us are setting the example that the American dream is alive and well. Those are all wins that aren't directly related to how much money can I make. Where I'm making investments to change the game is, you know, one of my companies is called the, the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. Literally the name, because I wanted there to be no question about what we're doing. There's a drug called albendazole, that's generic now, and it's for a hookworm. And there's still hookworm epidemics in Alabama and Texas and other places. It's $200 a course. This is a genetic, a generic drug.

• 40:08Speaker 02

  So we created a company that went, and right now we're doing two things. One, we sent somebody overseas to the manufacturer that makes it for another country. They made it for all these other countries, but no one would import it here because they wouldn't take the time. And we sent someone over there to make sure the manufacturing was perfect. And now we bring it over there, over here. We gave away thousands and thousands of doses to Baylor to test it all. And we were ready to give it away, give away more and sell, start selling it to Alabama, but they're, the COVID blow up is, that's using up all their resources. But long story short. We're selling it for our cost, eight bucks plus fifteen percent, right? So we're effectively selling it for what's gonna be our cost plus, it's gonna be ten dollars and fifty cents instead of two hundred dollars, right?

• 40:51Speaker 02

  So those are the types of things that I'm focusing my time. We're trying to do the same thing with insulin. I'm building what's called an API in one of my buildings in Dallas. It's an advanced pharmacy, something or other. I forget what the I stands for. And we're just gonna be making generic drugs and selling them at cost plus fifteen percent. Period, end of story. We're gonna post it all on our website so you know exactly what our costs are. And we're gonna fuck the pharmacy industry. Now, the challenge for us is they're so entrenched with how they do pricing and how they do pharmacy benefit management. We're gonna have a battle, right? And there's no antitrust there. And you talk about, you know, talk about kill switches, right? That's typically what they do to drug companies. They'll just buy them or they'll try to preempt them. But we're going, you know, all those drugs that we can make

• 41:36Speaker 02

  and some I'm not gonna go into now because I don't want those pharmaceutical companies to come after us. They've already tried to buy us through the back door. And it's just not gonna happen. Those are the types of challenges I'm really looking at right now. There's a project I'm working on that's just in its infancy called Sick Bank, right? There's an economic model that says if at your company, you get one week or two week sick days, right? Well, if everybody contributed one sick day from their own personal sick bank, right? If days available into a centralized sick bank and the companies paid some amount of money for that day. Let's say, you know, it's two hundred sixty-eight dollars on average. Then we can have a centralized sick bank where if you get sick or I get sick

• 42:18Speaker 02

  or, you know, Kira gets sick and fourteen days is not enough, you just borrow up to twenty, up to another fourteen days. And then we'll pay you based off of your salary because your company's already put the money in. But, you know, just the economics work like a bank, right? A little bit like an insurance company. You know, different ways to approach the, you know, healthcare. Those are the types of things that I get excited about because I'm not, even it's tech, it's all tech driven. There's all the tech underpinning. There's AI applied in a lot of different things. But it solves, you know, tries to solve. Who knows if we'll be successful? But we're gonna try to solve these social problems that need to be solved.

• 42:56Nilay Patel?

  And is that related to, I mean, we started this conversation with government gridlock, the government's not effective, our politics are broken. Is that just a direct reflection of your feeling that way?

• 43:05Speaker 02

  Yeah, of course.

• 43:06Nilay Patel?

  Because a lot of people would say, like, I think about the amount of people who look at GoFundMes for healthcare and say, aren't you just, but you just made taxes. That's all you just did.

• 43:16Speaker 02

  Yeah, it's ridiculous, right? I mean, our healthcare system is broken. And it's because, you know, it's a lot simpler than people are making it out to be. And the answer's not Medicare for all. You know, one of the studies that I'm funding and one of the companies I'm working with right now, I just asked a very simple question. In Toronto, Canada, right? The province of Ontario, a hospital there has pretty much the exact same expenses as a New York City hospital. Real estate's the same, doctors' costs the same, everything's the same for the most part, except a couple of little things. And before I go into those, number one, I looked at what does Medicare pay for the top 35 procedures? And what does the province of Ontario pay a Toronto hospital for those same 35 procedures? 30 of them are

• 43:59Speaker 02

  significantly, they pay less, significantly less in Canada than even Medicare. And our hospitals say that they lose money, but the hospitals in Canada are for profit, not big profit, but they're, they're making a little bit of money, a little bit of money. Now, what are the things that make the difference? The new beds being built in this country are single bedrooms. In Canada, they're all multi-bed. I had, I had kidney stones in Canada, so I can tell you, right? They're multi-bedrooms.

• 44:26Nilay Patel?

  I like the idea of being your roommate in the hospital in Canada. There's a real, it's a real picture.

• 44:30Speaker 02

  Have you had kidney stones?

• 44:31Nilay Patel?

  Uh, no, thankfully.

• 44:33Speaker 02

  Painful, painful, painful. Literally sitting in a waiting room in Canada, Toronto, Toronto Hospital, Toronto General Hospital, and I'm dying, right? I mean, I'm puking, I'm dying. People are coming up asking me for autographs, autographs.

• 44:47Speaker 02

  And so they put me into on a gurney into a section in a hallway just to keep me away from people. But number one, just imagine the change in the cost structure for hospitals. Instead of being allowed to build one bedroom, one bedrooms in a hospital, a newly built hospital or update, you had to do two. Just think what happens to the cost structure immediately. Another thing, in Canada, they cover 70% of the capex, including property. One of the challenges in hospitals here is they want to get bigger and bigger and bigger because the bigger the hospital, the more things, you know, the more money the CEO management makes, the, you know, the, the, the bigger shit you look like you are. Yeah. Right? And a lot of times they'll go into new lines of business, cardiac, orthopedic, whatever,

• 45:30Speaker 02

  that, you know, don't always work, but are expensive. And so you see paintings, you see pianos, you see all the shit you see in a hospital. And they'll raise money, whatever. They don't do any cost accounting on that. And so they don't know, literally, a lot of hospitals don't even know how to account. So they use this thing called activity-based accounting, which allows them to kind of lie on these reports and make it seem like they're losing money. When if we just changed it so that for any capex, the government will cover 70% of it, you figure out the 30 so you don't just rip off the government all the time, and we'll make it work. Right? So those are two big things. And then, you know, there's some other little variance things that we don't have to go Medicare for All.

• 46:13Speaker 02

  The, the, the foundation of what makes it work in Canada is, you know, is government isn't all that volatile. They don't have the Donald Trumps of the world, at least not yet. Because if we tried Medicare for All, like I mentioned a little bit earlier, you know, and then you get another Donald Trump type in and he just tears it apart. Now we have no health system. So you need to have competition, but you've got to pick the right way. So that's another project that I'm working, actually multiple projects that I'm working on.

• 46:37Nilay Patel?

  It's interesting because you, the ones that you've talked about, they're in industries where there is rampant consolidation, right?

• 46:44Speaker 02

  Government protection.

• 46:45Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, it's like my parents are doctors, their hospital system, like where I grew up, there used to be eight hospitals and now they just slowly all merged. And the, my joke was always they worked at competing hospitals and we could always pick. And like, it's just inevitably now they work effectively the same one, right? Like.

• 47:02Speaker 02

  So part of the problem is competition.

• 47:04Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 47:04Speaker 02

  Right? So if one of those hospitals has single bedrooms and that, you know, you're, they're part of the network from your company, then the other hospital better have single bedrooms.

• 47:14Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 47:14Speaker 02

  And if you're not part of that network, you know, for, then you're going to have to compete to get access to it. And look, the insurance companies have no incentive to pay less, right? So they're paying the biggest hospital, the most marketable and best brand, more money than they should because they make, you know, after their medical loss ratios, they're making 15% of a bigger number, which makes them more money. And the hospital's getting paid more so they can build up more buildings and build more shit, right? That may or may not be needed. And then the hospital who doesn't win those battles are hospitals. See them.

• 47:49Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 47:49Speaker 02

  They're gone.

• 47:50Nilay Patel?

  But isn't, isn't that, that root, that consolidation, that drive to get bigger and bigger and bigger, isn't that the heart of many of the problems?

• 47:58Speaker 02

  Not even a tiny bit. Nope. The heart of the problem is there's no transparency on cost. You know, the Trump CMS did this where they're making you publish your prices coming up. Okay? And so you'll be able to have actual prices and see that, and you'll be able to do some shopping where you can, right? But the reality is, look, I've turned into such a healthcare geek, there's this thing called MedPAC where they do all this, you know, all the Medicare pricing analysis and everything. And I've read their transcripts, the most boring shit ever, right? And a lot of the foundation of the problem is hospital saying all the time, we can't make money at Medicare or Medicaid rates. And so that is the fundamental issue. And so now you can't make money and everybody believes that's the truth.

• 48:43Speaker 02

  Now they're just getting paid more and more that they're just spending on all this other stuff. And then there's two other things that I think that, that I will bring in, like in Canada. They pay for the malpractice insurance for the hospital.

• 48:55Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 48:55Speaker 02

  All right, that's smart thing to do, right? In Canada also, and it would help the hospitals of smaller sizes, every procedure gets paid for, every single one of them. And so, part of the healthcare thing I'm working on, every procedure gets paid for it. Because what happens is, you can walk into a hospital, and if you don't have insurance, then there's a whole process. You still have to get a certain amount of healthcare. Then there's a whole process that the hospital has to go through to get reimbursed. And that should be taken care of. And that reduces part of the risk as well. Because that's just basic healthcare rights. You know, but don't do that here. We make it circuitous, you know, make it circular to try to get hospitals to get reimbursed. So these are all common sense things that can make a huge difference that we can learn from Canada and wouldn't be all that difficult to apply here

• 49:40Speaker 02

  without going to the extremes of Medicare for All, where you kill private industry healthcare. And if that happens, and somebody who just hates Medicare for All and guts it, like we've seen try to happen with the ACA, we're not caught in a catch 22. Because there's no way to prevent some executive order from being written from a president in the future that says, okay, you know, just like the mandate's gone, you know, just like healthcare.gov is gone in Georgia, you can't protect against those things from happening at all. And that's the real underlying problem for Medicare for All.

• 50:13Nilay Patel?

  We're going to take one more break. But when we come back, we're going to talk about Mark's involvement in politics and hear a pretty good story about President Trump.

• 51:01Speaker 03

  If you're looking to hire, you need Indeed. With Indeed Sponsored Jobs, you can spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help your job get the premium status it deserves at indeed.com/podcast. Just go to indeed.com/podcast right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need to hire? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.

• 51:47Nilay Patel?

  We're back. Now, if you've been listening to Mark talk, he obviously has big ideas in healthcare and competition policy. Honestly, to me, it sounded a lot like conversations I've had with senators, other policymakers. So I asked Mark if his goal was eventually to do this as a policymaker himself. Do you think this work that you're describing happens in the market at the entrepreneurship level, which is kind of where you're describing it? Or are you, your eyes on the prize, are you thinking that you're going to go be a policymaker? Because the conversation we're having sounds a lot like a policymaker conversation.

• 52:18Speaker 02

  Yeah, no, but you need support at some level, right? And being the policymaker doesn't help it at all, right? Because there's only so much you can do. But yeah, I mean, I've sat, I tried to explain this to Trump and

• 52:31Nilay Patel?

  Wait, give me, look, he's got, it's over. Give me a story about you talking to Trump.

• 52:36Speaker 02

  No, I mean, look, so the genesis of all this with healthcare is once McLean gave the thumbs down to repeal the ACA, they still needed a repeal and replace at some level.

• 52:47Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 52:48Speaker 02

  So I'm like, hey, if I was going to do a repeal and replace, what would I do? And so I started going through all this stuff that I just talked to you about. And I went to present to Jared Kushner and some of the other people and Alex Azar. And look, you know, their heart was in the right place, but the politics was in a worse place.

• 53:03Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 53:03Speaker 02

  And I just happened to be in there and they're like, well, the boss would like to see you. And I walked in, I'm like, okay, what the fuck's he going to say to me, right? Yeah, I know we had a little disagreements on stuff. No big deal. Sit down. And I started talking about, you know, what we're trying to do. Like I just was talking to you. And he's like, okay, so what do you think about, you know, me selling, you know, no, I did a deal. Did I tell you I did a deal with Boeing to sell planes for them?

• 53:28Nilay Patel?

  Oh, my God.

• 53:29Speaker 02

  You know, I'm like, okay, you know, he just subject to subject to subject, which is fine. It was 20 minutes and then I'm getting up to walk out and he goes, and I had one of my Shark Tank suits on. He goes, damn, Mark, you look good. Have you been working out?

• 53:46Nilay Patel?

  Uh, well, at least they got the compliment. Look, a tailored suit makes everybody look great.

• 53:49Speaker 02

  That wasn't tailored off the shelf. What was tailored off the shelf?

• 53:53Nilay Patel?

  We only have a few minutes left, but what I'm realizing is that you and I have opposite viewpoints, depending on where we are in the stack. Down here at infrastructure, I'm like, you got to regulate it. We have to, the government should do stuff. And up at the very consumer facing, how does Facebook work? I'm like, I think we should break them up and have more competition. And you're like, we should tweak their algorithms. It's, that is a really strange spread.

• 54:17Speaker 02

  I'm not dogmatic about anything.

• 54:19Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 54:19Speaker 02

  Nothing. I'll look at every problem and I'll say, how can it help? You know, depending on what we're discussing, how can it help the American people in one way or the other? Right? Sometimes enabling business, that's what you need to do. You want, you know, you want companies to grow and be successful. Sometimes it's technology and you need context. Right? Sometimes it's healthcare and it's just a motherfucking right. How to do it right. So you can't just say, and that's part of the problem going forward on all the politics. Right? Because I'm terrified from either side, you know, the Republicans are dogmatic about trickle down. And the Democrats are dogmatic about their version of trickle down. We're going to give it to a government program, have people apply and hope it trickles down to the people who needs it.

• 55:00Speaker 02

  We need it. We learn from the stimulus and the fact that, you know, stimulus will help us now, not more programs, but stimulus, we learned trickle up works better than anything. And hopefully we'll learn that going forward and you won't see Chuck Schumer or Mitch McConnell being dogmatic and doing it this, because this is the way it's always been done.

• 55:17Nilay Patel?

  It seems like whatever happens next in the Biden administration, the fundamental question will be, can they actually operate the government? Because these questions are pretty massive. And no matter what we've talked about, they require some amount of actual policymaking to get done.

• 55:33Speaker 02

  Well, if they can get it passed, right?

• 55:35Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 55:35Speaker 02

  And so to me, the ultimate Biden skillset is, can he lead? Can he bring people together? Because that's what we need more than anything. And if he's able to do that, then the legislation will probably be fair as opposed to dogmatic. You know, my greatest fear, as I said earlier, is if the Democrats win the Senate and Chuck Schumer turns into the Democratic version of Mitch McConnell. And he just does everything that Mitch McConnell did, which was horrific, right? But to the benefit of the Democratic Party. And, you know, we start talking about, you know, Chuck Schumer putting party over country. And that leads to more civil problems and challenges. And so I guess what I'm saying is, I don't trust the Democrats to do the

• 56:18Speaker 02

  right thing, because power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

• 56:23Nilay Patel?

  I guess we'll see. Mark, it has been, I'm so happy that you've been the first guest on the show. This has been a great conversation.

• 56:28Speaker 02

  Yeah, we covered a lot of stuff.

• 56:30Nilay Patel?

  Wait, in one hour? We just like flew through it. I knew it. We're gonna have to have you back. We'll have like a midpoint check in on the first year of Biden. We'll have to have you back soon.

• 56:38Speaker 02

  Oh, I'm happy to, right? I hope, you know, I hope it's just brilliant and smooth sailing and everything's amazing.

• 56:43Nilay Patel?

  All right, man. Thank you so much.

• 56:44Speaker 02

  Thank you, man.

• 56:46Nilay Patel?

  So that's the first episode of Decoder. Thank you to Mark Cuban for being our first guest. And thanks to you for listening. We hope you enjoyed it. We would love your feedback. You can tweet at me, I'm at Reckless. We have more to come. This is just the beginning. Decoder is a production from The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. The show is produced by Sophie Erickson. Our audio engineer is Andrew Moreno. Our music is by Breakmaster Semud. Please subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. We'll be back next Tuesday with another episode of Decoder. See you then.

• 57:19Speaker 05

  Support for this show comes from Harvey AI. The future of law is agentic, not just tools that assist, but AI agents that navigate complex matters. That's why Harvey created agents that can do the work from end to end. They build a plan, pull from secure data sources, run subagents in parallel, and draft the work product ready for your review. So you delegate the work and own the judgment. Trusted by more than 60% of the AM Law 100 and leading Fortune 500 legal teams, Harvey is the AI operating system designed specifically for legal work. Harvey, AI tailored for law. Learn more at harvey.ai.

• 58:01Speaker 06

  First Citizens Innovation Banking, formerly Silicon Valley Bank, is the bank of the innovation economy. The name may have changed, but for over 40 years, their commitment to bold ideas, relentless ambition, and delivering what's next is as strong as ever. So if you're wondering where the road to innovation starts, it's here. First Citizens Innovation Banking. Head to firstcitizens.com/innovation to learn more.