Is AI Slowing Down?, Trouble at Tesla, Kate Middleton’s Bad At Photoshop

Ranjan Roy from Margins is back for our weekly discussion of the latest tech news. We cover 1) AI sales leaders at Google and Amazon tempering expectations 2) Adobe as a practical example of AI hype vs. reality 3) Does Adobe belong in the magnificent 7? 4) Gartner predicts traditional search volume drops 25% by 2026 5) OpenAI video generator Sora is coming out later this year 6) OpenAI CTO Mira Murati didn't know what data Sora trained on 7) Murati address NYTimes report that he helped oust Sam Altman 8) OpenAI adds three members to its board 9) Instacart CEO Fidji Simo joins OpenAI board, so, more advertising in ChatGPT? 10) A meditation on covering Elon Musk 11) Tough times for Tesla 12) TikTok ban latest 13) Kate Middleton's bad photoshop job --- Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice. Want a discount for Big Technology Premium? Here’s 40% off for the first year: https://tinyurl.com/bigtechnology Questions? Feedback? Write to: [email protected] Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Alex Kantrowitz?

  Is AI slowing down after all that hype? Trouble at Tesla as the downgrades pour in? The TikTok ban slows down in the Senate? And Kate Middleton is bad at Photoshop? Or is she? All that and more, coming up, right after this. This episode is brought to you by Genesis. What does it actually take to put a Gentic AI to work across an entire enterprise? I recently spoke with Genesis chairman and CEO Tony Bates about why orchestration is emerging as a competitive advantage in customer experience and what companies need to get right in the AI era. Then I sat down with Adam Mitchell, head of enterprise business solutions at Voya Financial, to go inside a large-scale agentic CX transformation, including the business decisions, trade-offs, and lessons along the way.

• 0:45Alex Kantrowitz?

  You can watch both conversations now on my YouTube channel today. It's never been more challenging to get frontier compute. How do you know where to look? Who to trust? Or how much to pay? Akash is an open cloud that provides easy access, flexibility, and peace of mind. That's how companies like Razer were able to cut their inference cost by 15 times. Visit akash.network/alex for a free consultation. That's akash.network/alex for a free consultation. Welcome to Big Technology Podcast Friday Edition, where we break down the news in our traditional cool-headed and nuanced format. We have such a great show for you today. We're going to talk about the chances of AI's momentum persisting.

• 1:29Alex Kantrowitz?

  There's been some signs of slowing this week. We should talk about that and also plenty on Tesla, TikTok. And yes, we're going to end with Kate Middleton. Joining us, as always, is Ron John Roy of Margins. Ron John, welcome.

• 1:42Speaker 01

  I would like to start with Kate Middleton, but I think AI slowing down is the right place to start.

• 1:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, we'll leave that as the juicy nugget at the end for people to stick with us through the whole show. But this is also juicy, right up top. The information is reporting that, let's just read the headline. The information is reporting that Amazon and Google are quietly tamping down generative AI expectations. And they say, in the past year, major technology firms have championed generative artific- Official intelligence as the next big thing boosted the stock market to new highs. But behind the scenes, representatives of major cloud providers and other firms that sell the technology are tempering expectations with their salespeople, saying the hype about the technology has gotten ahead of what it can actually do for customers at a reasonable price. I love that last sentence, that the hype has gotten ahead of what it can do for

• 2:31Alex Kantrowitz?

  customers at a reasonable price. Okay, translation, it isn't selling the way that people hoped it was going to sell. And I guess to me, this isn't a total surprise. Like, we knew that this was going to take time, but it is interesting that we're getting this headline out now, because it does indicate that maybe finally, this this year, year and a half of AI hype is starting to hit a wall.

• 2:52Speaker 01

  Yeah, I think this is the most important tech article of the week, and I'm actually happy about it. I think the hype cycle around generative AI has been so over the top that expectations have become completely detached from reality. And again, as regular listeners will know, I'm a big believer in this technology. But you can picture at so many large enterprises, they've been promised how this is going to transform every part of their work. And then anyone who's used ChatGPT or any consumer facing product knows, when you sit down, there's a bit of magic, but then when you start to get into the nitty gritty of things, it takes time, it takes work. And I think getting, building that expectation for all

• 3:36Speaker 01

  these large companies that have been sold these dreams and understand, getting them to understand that it will take time, I think is important. And I think we're in the trough of disillusionment, as per the Gartner hype cycle. And I actually think it's a good thing, because to go from the trough of disillusionment, then you get to your slope of enlightenment and plateau of productivity, which is where we all want to get. So.

• 3:59Alex Kantrowitz?

  It's important. I agree. And the thing that we've seen has been the picks and shovels have really done well, like Nvidia has done amazing in this moment, because they're providing the technology that allows the training and the inference here. Microsoft, right, which isn't quite that, but they obviously have their investment in OpenAI. And they also have a very clear practical use of putting this stuff into office. All these others are going to really find some time to struggle. And I was on CNBC this morning, very early, talking about Adobe's earnings, which came in yesterday. And Adobe's earned, they beat expectations, but they guided poorly for the coming quarter. And the market kicked their butt. They dropped its stock 12%. And there was, it's, you know, it's interesting because they make $5 billion a quarter or more than that.

• 4:45Alex Kantrowitz?

  And this is happening over basically a shortfall of 19 million, but it's an important shortfall of 19 million coming up next year. So this is from Fortune. It says Adobe expects 440 million in new recurring creative business in the current quarter, below the 459 million expected. So 19 million less in new recurring creative business revenue. And that's basically, you know, they expected their AI offering. The idea that you could prompt and, and, you know, select images and fill it in with generative fill. They expected that to increase adoption in Photoshop. This is the real question. Is it going to bring more designers online to Adobe?

• 5:26Alex Kantrowitz?

  Or is it just going to be a better, you know, experience for the existing designers? And it seems like, yes, most likely we're in this early era of trying, this early moment of seeing what this hype cycle, you know, is, is all about and what nets out as real. And in Adobe's case, it's pretty clear that it's just going to be a better tool for designers. And indeed, if there is, if there is growth, it might come from other AI tools that are not Adobe.

• 5:53Speaker 01

  Oh, see, I, I, I look at it a bit differently here. I think Adobe is a perfect use case for this example of is it slowing down and if so, why? Because if you think about, okay, you take the typical graphic designer who's well versed in Photoshop. And anyone, have you played with generative fill or any of the Photoshop features?

• 6:11Alex Kantrowitz?

  I haven't used that, but I have used their, actually, believe it or not, I've used their podcast AI enhancement. Oh, we both have, and it is amazing. Like it's an actually incredible tool. But I use it. I get that free as part of using Adobe Audition, the, the editing software.

• 6:27Speaker 01

  Yeah. So the Adobe podcast software, again, you can put any audio highly recommended and it sounds professional, takes out all the background noise. But with Photoshop, you know, the bread and butter of Adobe, you have the typical graphic designer will be given these features. Is likely the average graphic designer a bit skeptical about generative AI? And I've used a number of these features, tested them, seen others using these. If you don't know how to prompt properly, it's gonna look weird. It's not gonna work well. You're gonna start to get a bit disillusioned. You've already been told that this is gonna potentially replace your job, or this is gonna, you know, change everything. And then you try to do a generative fill and it looks pretty crappy.

• 7:10Speaker 01

  So then suddenly it completely changes, you know, what this actual, what the expectations are in the near term, in the medium term. So I think it's gonna cause problems the way they've sold this to their existing customers. But I, I, I think it doesn't necessarily create some huge new customer base for them. But I do think if and when they get these to do what they're supposed to do and what they're promising to do, they can have insane pricing power. And, and I've argued this forever, that the companies that are in the strongest positions are the ones that own the tools where users already are. And if they're able to actually bring them more value within those tools, which this is a perfect example, they're gonna start raising prices

• 7:55Speaker 01

  and they're gonna have all the ability to. And they probably should be able to because they're gonna bring incredible amounts of productivity improvements for everyday workers. But it's definitely not there yet. And I think we're gonna start seeing that not just this quarter, but in the quarters, probably in the next few quarters as well.

• 8:14Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, those are great points. So I think what you're talking about is, is A, it's not quite there yet. And even if it gets there, there's, there, there might be pricing power there, but it's gonna be tough to bring on, I think it'll be tough to bring on new accounts. So effectively, what you're trying to, what you're doing is you're gonna try to get a functionality improvement that will cut into existing budgets. Like the, no, let's say you're using Photoshop and you have a B to B marketing, you're in a B to B marketing division. You're gonna ask, you're gonna go ask for extra budget. Uh, that's, that's gonna be quite, I don't know if you're gonna get that budget. So it's not as simple as bringing on new customers, right? It's a matter of like, you're gonna, this is a play to try to get more money out of existing customers. And good luck, because, you know, there're gonna be people

• 8:57Alex Kantrowitz?

  who are gonna be approving these expenses within companies where not in zero interest rate, where every expense is approved anymore. And they're gonna be like, well, you're making the one sheets fine as it is. So, you know, are, are you gonna really need to pay for these extra seats? Um, and if this AI is as good as you say it is, does that mean that they start to say, well, how many designers do I actually need? If I could just prompt and create a one sheet instead?

• 9:23Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, Adobe, I think Scott Belsky had said it himself, like, you know, there is that huge question of are you by improving your tools to such an exponential level actually decreasing your addressable market? I mean, I think every company is thinking about that, whether it's Microsoft, Google, Adobe, but at that level, I feel they still understand that if they own the platforms, they will not be in any significant trouble. But I don't know, one thing I've been thinking about a lot on this, and this might be a little out there, but I've like talked about and written about how can hype cycles actually

• 10:03Speaker 01

  kind of will innovation out of existence interrupted in such a negative way that we never actually see the true value? And with generative AI, the reason I'm excited about this moment that's the trough of disillusionment is, and then with crypto, would the technological promise ever have been realized? Could we actually have seen all the genuine utilization and killer apps if the price, like, action and the hype cycle around price didn't completely overtake the entire industry? And I wonder, because like, I think this, there's going to be a lot of negative sentiment when people don't get the exact promise of generative AI

• 10:45Speaker 01

  across all these different use cases that they've been promised right away because it's been sold as that. And I think you made a good point on that. It's like, those kind of micro decisions around budget are going to be happening everywhere. Google is trying to sell Gemini for workspace at an additional, I think it's like 20 bucks per seat. That's a lot of money for a large enterprise. And it's one of those where, at this exact moment, it's hard to justify that, especially at scale. Should in six to 12 months, or maybe at some timeframe, Generative AI be perfectly embedded in all every Google Workspace tool? Yes, and I think they'll get there, but but these budget questions are going to happen. And then you've because of the level of expectation.

• 11:30Speaker 01

  If they don't meet these budgets and expectations in the next few quarters. Do they start cutting programs? Do these companies start cutting back and saying, well, maybe this isn't going to work? And then does it all just fade away?

• 11:44Alex Kantrowitz?

  That's right. And, you know, on CNBC, they asked me, so does Adobe now belong in the magnificent seven? If we replace Tesla because they have AI? And my point is is totally in line with what you're saying here, which is just because a company is quote unquote, doing AI, doesn't mean they're going to see exponential benefits the way that the, you know, some in the market might expect like it's actually a much more nuanced answer than that.

• 12:07Speaker 01

  I know we're going to get into it, but I just have to say about we're going to get into Tesla in a little bit. But the fact that we are discussing that Adobe is an AI company and Tesla is not is a perfect sign of the times right now.

• 12:21Alex Kantrowitz?

  Absolutely. And yes, some Tesla discussion coming up shortly. I also think that it's important to point out that when we start to see some numbers and predictions that, you know, there might not be as much there as as we actually imagine. Or I think it's important to view it with a little bit of skepticism. Not to say this stuff can't happen, but Gartner had this prediction that traditional search volume is going to drop 25% by 2026. And it's a huge prediction. And to Gartner's credit, when I asked them to speak with me about it, they put Alan Anton on on the phone, who's a VP over there who's responsible for coming up up with this number. And so I asked him, how did you get to this number? And he goes, if you think about it, there are over 1.5 billion Apple iPhones.

• 13:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  All it takes is a new rollout and suddenly the access point to impact that giant number of daily searches, which is like eight trillion or something like that, happens without or eight billion a day happens without people having to download or subscribe to a version of ChatGPT. Basically, what he's saying is that like. We could see this decline, 25% decline in search if the Apple were to replace like Google search within the iPhone. Now, is that possible? Sure, but that would be an $18 billion a year hit to Apple or yeah, $18 billion a year hit to Apple revenue. And I don't think it's necessarily a slam dunk. They're going to make that happen or anything close to that. So when you see a number from Gartner, that 25% of search volume is going to go down.

• 13:45Alex Kantrowitz?

  It's predicated on such a big thing happen happening by 2026. And that's what I'm just like, oh, okay. And I was like, so how did you get to the 25 number, 25% number exactly? And he says, and I think this is crucial just through internal debate. So

• 14:02Speaker 01

  Well, you know, through our own internal debate here on the big technology podcast, I'm going to come up with a bigger number. I honestly think 25% in two years' time is conservative. I have almost completely stopped using traditional search. We've talked about this. I got perplexity on the phone. Even Gemini am using rather than traditional Google search. Generative search is so much better. Like getting the answers you need is just infinitely better, more tailored to you. And I mean, in terms of what that means for the web at large is a whole discussion, but like, I think the every

• 14:43Speaker 01

  time the average user starts to try generative search, the more it gets integrated already within Google.com itself now more and more. I think almost every search now, especially I do on mobile, has a generative component up top. It's just a better way to present information. And, and traditional search has gotten so bad that I think it's, it's, it's going to be bigger than 25%. I'm going to say 32.

• 15:08Alex Kantrowitz?

  32? I don't think so. I think that you are discounting how hard it is to change user behavior. And remember, in this day and age, there are still people paying for like AOL dial up fees because they've forgotten to like, cancel those accounts. I mean, obviously they're not going there every day, but it is so tough to change user behavior online. And if you're going to have a 20 or 32% drop in search volume, that's going to really be a sea change in behavior. I mean, it's just hard. It's not the stopping of growth, which is what we usually see. It's a complete flip.

• 15:44Speaker 01

  No, but remember, and again, for better or for worse, search is a monopolized function tool and Google controls it. The Apple search bar on the iPhone controls it, which goes to Google currently. Like, like, Google flips the switch and it completely changes and they're the ones in control of it. It's a fundamental threat to their business, but they're already moving in that direction. So what the moment they realize that, okay, this is the right way for search to happen and they make a courageous decision that we're going to disrupt our own business and actually present search in this way to remain the owners of it, to make sure that Google.com is still where people go

• 16:27Speaker 01

  to find information. I think it can happen, not overnight, but in a pretty short amount of time. And again, for anyone who's using generative search, it's so, it's such a step change in terms of quality of results and just how you find information that to me, there's no doubt that that's the way it's going.

• 16:46Alex Kantrowitz?

  You know, I will admit that after speaking with Alan, I did believe that this was less of an outlandish prediction than I thought in the beginning, but I'm still pretty skeptical of it. And look at you, Ron, John, coming on here, guns blazing, saying AI hype is...

• 17:00Speaker 01

  Thirty-two, thirty-two.

• 17:01Alex Kantrowitz?

  Not only that, you're saying AI hype is deflating. That's a good thing. And then you drop this prediction that AI is replacing search by 32%.

• 17:09Speaker 01

  That's my, but it's two years, two years. That's not, not six months, not three months.

• 17:13Alex Kantrowitz?

  You're in three quarters on my watch. I don't know. It's pretty soon. Better get going on this, on this transition. But let me, let me take the hype side again, because I saw something fairly incredible this week that we talked about on the Wednesday podcast, but I think is worth bringing up as a counterpoint to like this AI hype cycle dying, which is that there's, this is from Business Insider, "Software engineers are getting closer to finding out if AI can really make them jobless." And here's the story, "Software engineers who managed to survive the brutal wave of tech layoffs aren't in the clear just yet. AI that does their jobs is coming for them. A little-known startup called Cognition Labs stunned software engineers this week when its team of coding whizzes unveiled Devon, the first AI software engineer."

• 17:58Alex Kantrowitz?

  The creation from a barely two-month-old startup backed by Peter Thiel's venture capital fund might appear to have an apt or appears to have an aptitude that's a notch above traditional engineers. And I took a look at this. I went to the demo video and it was pretty amazing, the capabilities that they're saying that this Devon AI software engineer can do. So it says it can, you give it a task, it can do a step-by-step plan, write the code, use a browser to pull up API documentation, debug, and then build an entire website. I mean, if this stuff, you know, there's, I don't think Devon necessarily will be it. And in fact, there's a counterpoint where like people on Reddit called it a chat GPT

• 18:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  Raptor wrapper with extra hype sauce. It almost feels like a crypto cash grab. But the bottom line is it's just going to take one of these things to work. And all of a sudden, that could potentially be a revolution in the way that we build, build computing and build software.

• 18:55Speaker 01

  Okay. I think I'm now seeing we had like cloud revenues down, search down, and now hype cycle around engineering and software development. I think I see where my point of view is coming. To me, this felt again, like a fancy demo video that is answering something that should be happening and will happen at some point, but likely is not happening tomorrow or the next few weeks. I think why generative search, I'm almost more bullish is no one talks about it. There's no, everyone's typing, Google's typing Gemini, the chatbot, but never talking about generative search. So it's almost one of those that is working

• 19:36Speaker 01

  and it's working well, but there's no fancy demo videos. It's just you use it and it's done versus again, software development by all measures, it's the most structured type of thinking should be AI-generated and like should be, this should work. And I mean, it's again, it sounds amazing, like being able to pull up parse API documentation, write code off of that and build a website that's more than HTML and CSS and actually has connectors and, and interactivity like it should happen. But I can totally picture this is one of those things that it's a nice demo video for a chat GPT wrapper. And if we go to actually use it, we're not building a website tomorrow.

• 20:21Alex Kantrowitz?

  Exactly. And to me, the thing is really that it sets the vision and you know, someone's going to build it. It might just be some time, but it sets that vision. And who knows, maybe learn to code is going to be learn to prompt at some point.

• 20:31Speaker 01

  Oh, it's already there.

• 20:33Alex Kantrowitz?

  Learn to prompt. So, speaking of fancy demo videos, we obviously know that OpenAI released these fancy demo videos of Sora, and we did get some news this week about its video generator. So, the Wall Street Journal did this interview with Mir Mirati, who we spoke about last week, and we'll continue to speak about this week. And she broke some news. She said, OpenAI is going to release Sora, the new text to video tool, later this year. It could be months. It could be sometime later in the year, but it's coming. It's going to be released this year, which to me actually registered as a surprise that they're going to ship it this fast, because you remember when they rolled it out, they were not 100% sure if it was going to go public anytime soon. And this feels soon to me.

• 21:14Speaker 01

  Yeah. Well, first, we'll wait and see when it actually is is out there. But I think, yeah, text to video is certainly almost the most hyped part of this hype cycle, because it's one of the most difficult problems to solve. But obviously, those initial demos were incredible. I was more fascinated by, in the interview, again, Joanna Stern kept asking her with the Wall Street Journal, you know, what data do you train on? Do you train on videos on YouTube? She said, I'm actually not sure about that. Videos from Facebook or Instagram? She said, you know, if they're publicly available to use, there might be that data, but I'm not sure. I'm not confident about it. And we'll get into a shutter stock in a second, but like, which they have a set deal with. I'm amazed,

• 21:58Speaker 01

  given all the scrutiny, especially there to the ones under a lawsuit from the New York Times on copyright infringement. They didn't have answers to that. Like, she wasn't 100% prepped. It almost remind, it made me feel like they've been getting such layups, layups and softball interviews to date around the underlying foundations of these models that to not be able to answer that for an $80 billion company was kind of shocking to me.

• 22:28Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, this is Bryant Merchant, who's a columnist and a tech critic. He said, so when the CTO of OpenAI is asked if Sora was trained on YouTube videos, she says, I'm actually not sure, and refuses to discuss all further questions about the training data. Either a rather stunning level of ignorance of her own product or a lie, pretty damning either way. And then he makes the point that you're bringing up. Note how completely Maroti freezes when she's asked a straightforward question about training data. Reflects how the OpenAI crew is used to softballs or chin stroking questions about AGI. When a journalist pushes for a real answer about a material issue, she's flustered and defensive. Sort of, kind of goes to, I mean, it's a point of pride to me at this point that we haven't

• 23:12Alex Kantrowitz?

  had anybody from OpenAI on the show because that is the type of question that they're used to and they're, they're, they go for. And they wouldn't get that here. So.

• 23:21Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, it's almost like as the CTO of theoretically, one of the most technologically advanced companies in the world, this should not just be catnip for you. Like, you should be excited of how we built these models. This is like your intellectual prowess at work. That was the most shocking part to me that this is the kind of stuff that not only should you have an answer for from a media training perspective, you should be excited about this stuff. This stuff is fun. And I think it actually, I think that was a pretty important interview. And, and I know, like, the fact that that clip is going viral, it's going to start to raise more questions, or hopefully, I guess, in a good

• 24:01Speaker 01

  way, have tougher questions to ask about the models. I think we, this has been a columnist, like a recurring meme at this point for us on this podcast, that how this is an $80 billion company versus how they operate on all the things that companies of that scale are supposed to do, still shocks me every single week.

• 24:22Alex Kantrowitz?

  Exactly. And, you know, we spoke about it last week about how this OpenAI name is a misnomer, right? And I was listening to another show and heard this like really important point, which is that OpenAI, I think Scott Galloway made this point actually on Pivot, that OpenAI's open has become the same thing as like move fast and break things at Facebook and don't be evil at Google. It's just this thing that sort of will dog them forever. It's kind of why I believe they should change the name because it's just, you can't, you're clearly not open. You're not going to talk about these things. Like, let's move on.

• 24:58Speaker 01

  Hey, remember, rename yourself ChatGPT. That's, that's still my, my marketing suggestion for them.

• 25:07Alex Kantrowitz?

  So, speaking of Mirer Maratti, just after we spoke about, you know, this, this New York Times article that said she was part of Sam's ouster in November, she, so lots of news broke. First of all, she came out and addressed the article. Okay, so she says, "Some of you have seen a New York Times article about me and the old board. I find it frustrating that some people seem to want to cause chaos as we are trying to move on, but to very briefly comment on the specific claims there. Sam and I have a strong and productive partnership, but I have not been shy about sharing feedback with him directly. I never reached out to the board to give feedback about Sam. However, when individual board members reached out directly to me for feedback about Sam, I provided it. All

• 25:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  feedback Sam already knew. That does not mean in any way that I am responsible for or supported the old board's action, which I still find perplexing. I fought their actions aggressively, and we all worked together to bring Sam back. Really looking forward to get the board review done and put the gossip behind us." Basically, it seems like she's saying like the old board leaked this to the New York Times and is coming out and saying like, that's ridiculous.

• 26:16Speaker 01

  Yeah, whenever you hear the word gossip or kind of people trying to fight back against an article with that kind of tone, it's not a great sign. But again, the fact that it was likely board members that she was confiding in leaking this to The Times clearly is a reminder that things are a bit crazy over there and remain crazy and likely are not going to slow down anytime soon.

• 26:39Alex Kantrowitz?

  Totally. And I stand by like our headline of the podcast last week was OpenAI's turmoil rolls on. And it doesn't seem like it's gonna, you know, there's, there's still that instability there. That being said, I do apologize because I did say that I believe that this report was gonna lead to some concrete information about what happened. And then basically after we hit publish on Friday, so did OpenAI on, on the report and it found that nothing was, nothing happened. So it's, this is the story, I think, from Axios. OpenAI did not publish the investigation, but provided a summary of the findings. The review concluded that there was a significant breakdown, breakdown of trust between the prior board and Sam and Greg. And they concluded that they, they both had the board acted in good faith and

• 27:24Alex Kantrowitz?

  did not anticipate some of the instability that led afterwards. Nothing to see here. Then Sam is reinstated to the board and puts three new members on Dr. Sue Desmond Hellman, who's the former CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Nicole Seligman, who's the former EVP and Global General Counsel of Sony and President of Sony Entertainment, and Fiji Simo, who's the CEO of Instacart. So a much more diverse board right now and in a more rounded out board. Interestingly, no Microsoft seat. And Sam basically got on a conference call and said, I'm glad that we've put this behind us. I guess I still question like, you know, have we? But it does seem like this chapter has come to an end.

• 28:07Speaker 01

  I have a theory, as you read the names of the board members. Uh, Fiji Simo, she was, she actually was one of the, you know, most senior executives running advertising at Meta slash Facebook. Um, and I remember when she went over to Instacart, it was very clearly a signal, it was pre-IPO, that Instacart is going to build out its advertising business. And they did, they did very successfully. And now, I'm not sure the exact percentage, but it's a significant percent portion of their overall revenue mix. Does this mean OpenAI is starting to think about advertising in ChatGPT?

• 28:46Alex Kantrowitz?

  Most definitely.

• 28:47Speaker 01

  That's an interesting one.

• 28:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  There's a rumor that they are building their own search engine. So Fiji actually makes a ton of sense there.

• 28:53Speaker 01

  Oh, I like this, I like this. We're not too far away from ChatGPT giving you an answer and then also providing you a suggested link or suggested product.

• 29:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  Absolutely. And Fiji, of course, was an important, uh, product executive within Facebook as well. She really knows consumer products that touch a lot of people and all the little tricks that you use to make sure that they keep coming back. So I think she's going to actually be an invaluable member of the board there.

• 29:18Speaker 01

  Yeah, that's an interesting one. I wonder, I still wonder that they didn't release the entire investigation, but only a summary, did they use ChatGPT to summarize it and add to the prompt? And do present this summary in a way that is still favorable to OpenAI, but that appears balanced. That would be my prompt.

• 29:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  I would be doing that, absolutely. If you believe in the product, go ahead and use it. Maybe a little edit here and there, but yeah. Another thing that, that we talked about last week was sort of this, uh, email between Ilya Sutskever and Elon Musk about the desire to not be as open as they would, you know, sort of make it out to be to the public and saying that being open is for a recruiting process, uh, and basically how this makes OpenAI's open seem hypocritical. And we had a listener point out quite angrily in the, in the reviews that, um, left out the fact that, you know, basically the whole blog post made Elon Musk's attempt to take over, uh, and to sue OpenAI.

• 30:17Alex Kantrowitz?

  Somewhat hypocritical. And, and I agree with that. I think that's actually, you know, an important point that did happen. That being said, like last week, we're just trying to talk about what mattered and that what mattered was the fact that OpenAI had made this admission. I don't think Elon Musk is really that relevant anymore in terms of what OpenAI is doing. Of course, he's going to bring this lawsuit. You know, might poke them a little bit and help us learn more about them, but they're the big story, honestly, not Elon. And so it's not like a defensive Elon that, that was skipped over last week. It was sort of a, let's put the important story first.

• 30:51Speaker 01

  Well, no, but how do you then feel about, I mean, Elon Musk is clearly one of the biggest figures in technology. And he is suing OpenAI and he was a founding member of the company. You don't think he's central to the story?

• 31:04Alex Kantrowitz?

  No, I think he is central, but I think the, like the, I don't think that it's as like, what we care about is OpenAI. Do we care about, and, and that this lawsuit is going to get more information about them out in the public? Do we care about like the, you know, the fact that Elon's been exposed for, for leaving and then coming back and being self-serving? I don't think that that's as important.

• 31:27Speaker 01

  I don't know. Okay. I, I would agree. I would, in the sense that it like Elon's role is specific to the initial, like how, what his role was at the time and is he going to get some kind of financial compensation? To me, it still feels though, like this puts him front and center in the AI conversation at a moment that he needs to be. It reminds the entire world that he was this, the most hyped AI company in the world. He is directly connected to, which still gives him a tremendous amount of credibility around AI in general. And it's something I think is at this moment, and it's important.

• 32:05Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, no, I agree. I don't think he's an on-story. I just didn't think he was the main story last week. But anyway, we probably should have addressed it and I just wanted to put it out there. Also, just like a word about, and I'll just do a quick little rant here about our sort of exposition about covering Elon. Because it does seem like every time we talk about Elon on the podcast, either someone who's pro Elon or someone who's anti- Elon doesn't like like one thing or a few things that that I've said or whatever has been talked about on the show and then leaves a bad review. So I just kind of want to talk about like my philosophy about covering Elon. So first of all, like I definitely like we have to acknowledge that Elon is a powerful and important figure in the tech world and we have to cover him. And he definitely inspires like strong emotions. I'm just about everybody who knows him and knows of

• 32:50Alex Kantrowitz?

  him one way or the other. And it's just like, it's our job to cover him. And at least speaking for myself, I see Elon as a nuanced figure. He's good at some things, he's bad at others, he's good at SpaceX, which had a very important, you know, advance in its program with its starship launch this week. And for the most part, he's good at running Tesla, though really, it's been rough lately. And we're going about to talk about that in the next segment. And I think he's been bad at running Twitter. And, you know, even though there are these like, strong emotions, I don't want to feel afraid to speak about him or or try to steer away from talking about him just because, you know, it's going to provoke some passions and, you know, I'll definitely get things wrong occasionally. The bottom line is that, you know, covering Elon and tech more

• 33:34Alex Kantrowitz?

  broadly, you know, we're going to do it with a broad group of guests from across the ideological divide. And this is just how I think that we learn and, you know, how I hope you you're going to learn about what's going on, because to leave these perspectives or leave people outside of the conversation, I don't think it really serves anybody. And we're going to ask the tough questions to to anybody who comes on and about any story without fear of favor. So, you know, I guess, like, when I see the ratings blow up, like with bad reviews, whenever we talk about Elon, it just makes me want to like, leave that topic completely alone. But I've just basically decided that, like, we're gonna cover it. And no matter where you are on the Elon spectrum, just asking,

• 34:15Alex Kantrowitz?

  like, give us some grace, allow us to be wrong on things or right, you know, allow me some room to give it wrong. And if there's feedback or things that you think we missed, we put the email every every single week in the in the show notes, it's [email protected]. You know, feel free to send feedback and we'll take it into consideration. And also, like,

• 34:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  On the ratings, I know I ask for them often, but they really are the only publicly available metric that people get to see around the podcasts and guests and their representatives look at them before deciding whether to come on. So, you know, a bunch of five-star ratings could be the difference between a lower-level executive or maybe having Jensen from Nvidia on the show speaking with you here. So, look, allow me to just humbly ask and then finish this, you know, little exposition to, please help us out if you can, give us a five-star review if you can, and also just understand that if you, like, anything like three, four, three, two, and one star, it basically means, kill the podcast. Like, you'd never want to go to a show with a three-star review. And, look, I'm not going to talk about it anymore, but I just felt that that was important to be said. So, like, Elon, important

• 35:22Alex Kantrowitz?

  to cover, we're gonna cover him, not always gonna get it right, but I'm not gonna ignore it, and I do want to hear from you if you think we're getting it wrong.

• 35:30Speaker 01

  Yeah, and I, as someone who can be tough on Elon, I will admit when I get it wrong. And certainly, my predictions around Tesla's revenue and earnings growth in 2022 were definitely wrong. But 2023 and now into 2024 starts to tell a different story, I think.

• 35:50Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, so that's a great segue, because in the nature of that little exposition, let's talk about Tesla earnings, or Tesla's situation right now. So, this is an unbelievable thing that's happened with Tesla. The analyst price target cuts have been crazy, crazy, just like earth-shattering, because remember, Tesla's already 60% off of its highs. It was at 1.2 trillion, now it's in the 500 billion range, and three major analysts have cut Tesla price targets this week. Deutsche Bank going from 250 to 218, Wells Fargo going from $200 to $125, this is the share price, and UBS cutting its price target from $225

• 36:34Alex Kantrowitz?

  to $165. Tesla right now is the worst performer in the S&P 500. It's down 32% or 34% now since the beginning of January. It's, of course, the growth, this is from, from one of the analyst notes, he highlights that sales volumes rose only 3% in the second half of 2023, from the first half where price, and prices fell 5%. And basically, they're saying that Tesla is now a no-growth story. Wells Fargo, Colin, Langan. It's a no-growth story. And this is happening as the S and P 500 is, is up.

• 37:17Alex Kantrowitz?

  So what do you make of what's happening with Tesla, Ron John?

• 37:21Speaker 01

  All right. So I think when looking at Tesla's stock, it's always important to detach it from Tesla, the company. Tesla's stock is down from the highs, as you said, I think almost 60%. It's still an expensive stock. The P E ratio is still 37, whereas Ford trades at seven times earnings. So relative to traditional automotive manufacturers, it's still expensive, but it was able to be expensive for a long time because their growth in 2020, 2021, 2022 was incredible. And even just when you walk outside, I mean, here in New York City, when I go home to my parents in Boston, the amount of Teslas I see on the street

• 38:02Speaker 01

  is significantly higher. It used to be this kind of like fun oddities to see on the street and a novelty almost.

• 38:09Alex Kantrowitz?

  It's mass market now.

• 38:10Speaker 01

  Yeah, now it's mass market. But in doing that, and they very specifically from a pricing perspective, significantly decreased prices. They took a margin contraction. The margin went from, I think it was like around 40% to 25% now. They're moving in the direction of a more traditional automotive manufacturer, which makes sense, given the scale they are, and also given the growth of E Vs across every automobile manufacturer. So I think they are becoming more of a normal car company. And in any other circumstance, that wouldn't be bad, right? Like that would be, okay, you're growing, you know, or maybe they grew so much in the last few years that maintaining that rapid pace of growth

• 38:52Speaker 01

  is difficult, but you're still a scaled automotive manufacturer that makes cars people like and come up with a new model, come up with new traditional growth strategies. But when you're trading like a tech stock, you can't do that. You have to have dojo robots on the roadmap and like, you have to sell a much bigger story that is difficult to realize versus, this has always been my issues, just be a great car company. And I think they could be a very interesting company.

• 39:20Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yep, and you're right. Like, think about Tesla. When it's more of the niche car company, right, it's selling the story, not the cars. Now it's moving toward a mass market car, mass market company. It's selling the cars and the story, you're right, becomes less important because we're starting to see the numbers. And the Tesla story is not just about Tesla cars. It's about the technology, autonomous driving, the charging stations, right? Like, you're going to be able to charge a Rivian in a Tesla charging station. It's about the batteries, right? People have called it a battery company. And all that, okay, so I'm just gonna put this out there. I think all that stuff seemed plausible when you were still small and you had more to grow. And it would even be more plausible now if Tesla

• 40:02Alex Kantrowitz?

  was the leading story in the market. If Tesla, autonomous driving, and the brilliance of Elon Musk was the leading story in the market like it had been for years. But we have a new story. And the story's artificial intelligence. And Jensen Huang is the new Elon Musk. He's more stable. He's behind the product that's really leading us into the future. And, and he's selling like crazy. And his margins are nuts.

• 40:29Speaker 01

  Do you think that Tesla will pull off that ecosystem story that was promised? Maybe not Dojo Robots, but they become a battery company and the charging infrastructure of the country. And like, do you think they pull that off? Or do you think they just continue into mass market automobile manufacturer?

• 40:51Alex Kantrowitz?

  As with everything with Tesla, it depends on Elon, right? And that's why Elon's central, yeah, it's just a centrality Elon story here. Can he push that vision forward? That's the vision. We'll see. Now, look at Elon. He's a little bit stretched through, stretched thin. He's doing the Twitter thing. He's doing all these other things. And does he have the time and the force of will left to, you know, be sleeping in that factory again and make that happen? And if you look at like, the recent calls he's had with analysts and the recent performance of the company, you know, even Dan Ives is talking about how they're, you know, they've been train wrecks. And

• 41:33Alex Kantrowitz?

  You know, I think that the Twitter thing is definitely contributing here. There's no way that's not a major distraction for him. So I think he should sell Twitter and just get on with it and focus on the things that are working.

• 41:45Speaker 01

  Now, I think, again, as you had gone through, sometimes we get it right, sometimes we get it wrong. If Tesla pulls off this ecosystem story and becomes a battery or charging or insurance company, I will readily admit I was wrong because right now it does not seem like it's heading in that direction, but you never know.

• 42:06Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. And again, like, do I think Elon Musk can pull this off? Absolutely. Do I think Elon Musk and his current state can pull this off? No.

• 42:13Speaker 01

  Yeah, I think that's fair.

• 42:15Alex Kantrowitz?

  And the market needs him to be, you know, it kind of needs him to be that Tesla, is it a coincidence that Tesla's dropped by 60% the stock, you know, since effectively the Twitter acquisition? Like, no, the market needs him to be this like Tony Stark like figure to believe in him that it's going to happen. And that's why I've said all along that the Twitter acquisition has the potential to be more costly than just the $44 billion. It's cost him way more than that because there are people who are trading and being like, I don't believe that this guy can do it.

• 42:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, but I disagree with that in the sense that the negative public perception of Elon Musk that's been growing based on what he tweets has always been there long before the acquisition. Now it's just he's more of a story to the average person rather than the kind of like, you know, tech crowd, myself included.

• 43:12Alex Kantrowitz?

  So, no, his business acumen is now tied directly to those tweets. He owns the company. Everybody can see it.

• 43:21Speaker 01

  Yeah, okay, all right. That makes a little more sense then.

• 43:24Alex Kantrowitz?

  But it really is a tough time for Tesla. SpaceX is doing great, but Tesla will have to figure this out. This is a pretty, the thing is, it's again, it goes back to the story and the story is not in its favor. And the, the.

• 43:39Alex Kantrowitz?

  The markdowns or the downgrades at these analysts, they're dramatic. It's crazy, like going from 200 to 125 dollars.

• 43:48Speaker 01

  Well, they mirror the markdowns on the cars as well, that going from like $50,000 average unit retail to 34. It's, it's when you're taking the same car and cutting the price, it's gonna, you're gonna sell more of them hopefully, but you're just gonna kill your margins.

• 44:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  Totally. Yeah, it's perfect storm. Okay, so speaking of a perfect storm, TikTok might be gone, which is crazy. We talked about this on the Wednesday show with Solana, but the bill passed the House and now it's in the Senate. So as I teased at the very top, that bill in the Senate looks like it's slowing down. So this is from the Wall Street Journal, TikTok's fate now hinges on the Senate. The Senate has hit the brakes and floated possible changes to the measure, dashing proponents hope for a quick passage and offering a potential reprieve to the popular short video app. Among the reasons for moving cautiously, senators say worries that targeting TikTok would curb free speech and set an uncomfortable precedent of meddling with the private business

• 44:46Alex Kantrowitz?

  while also trampling on younger voters devoted to the app if TikTok were ultimately shut down. This isn't going to be as easy as a lot of people imagined, even though the fact that the House voted in favor of the ban dramatically.

• 45:01Speaker 01

  Well, we have been since, I think I've been for too long of a time saying it's going to be banned, but I think we disagreed about this back in our predictions for this year. I said it would be banned, you said it wouldn't. We're getting closer at least. I think for me, I wrote about May 2019. I said, I still can't believe it's not a bigger story that a Chinese owned app is quietly taking over the American market. And I've been looking at this closely for years and it's always blown my mind, especially the amount of influence it has from a media perspective, the fact that it's a black box algorithm. So I will say personally, I'm very happy that this is on the national agenda right now.

• 45:45Speaker 01

  It's going to be interesting in the Senate. I think like. It's so rare that there is any kind of issue that brings that brings together coalitions like we're seeing, where you see, I think it was Marjorie Taylor Greene and AOC both voting against it.

• 46:01Alex Kantrowitz?

  That was amazing.

• 46:03Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah, which for me, I like, makes me feel more confident in my will for a TikTok ban. But but for me, I think it's, it all just comes back to the idea that a country of like, China has mastered the art of controlling the information flow of a billion people. They built the great firewall. They are the world's greatest censor and kind of controller of information. And an app that is a black box algorithm has become the most influential property in America. And again, that's both for younger people, but also TikTok drives overall culture right now. It still blows my mind that there's resistance to this.

• 46:48Speaker 01

  And I've been trying to read every argument on the other side that could possibly try to sway me, and I still haven't found it.

• 46:56Alex Kantrowitz?

  Well, let me do my best then. What do you think about this David Sacks argument that it's TikTok today and X tomorrow? And effectively that the bill calls these platforms for, I don't really believe this, but I'm just gonna like advance it and like knock it down. The bill calls for like a forced divestment or sale to any foreign controlled entities, or ban if they don't do it. And what Sacks is trying to say is that like they could use foreign controlled entities to be like Elon is actually controlled by China, therefore it has X has to be banned.

• 47:35Speaker 01

  I mean, but that's where a slippery slope argument to me is bananas, because like, the slippery slope is already here, that a foreign adversary that is the world's leader in controlling information, runs a black box algorithm that, you know, controls our attention and media influence. Like, I think, yeah, again, I think the idea that it will somehow go after X specifically, I think is

• 48:05Speaker 01

  Is a bit ridiculous, but it is fair. I think questioning how are different people beholden to different interests is something that should happen more, especially in any kind of influencer influential media property. So I don't think that's an unreasonable thing to bring up or ask. And Elon Musk's, if there is pressure related to Tesla's goals in China and how that could influence Twitter, I think it's a reasonable question. So I think those kinds of questions should be asked and have not been in the past. And that's why we are where we are.

• 48:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right. So do you think that if if people find enough suspicious things about Elon's relationship with China, that they should force him to sell X because it could be controlled by a foreign adversary?

• 48:48Speaker 01

  Well, no, but okay. So two things on that. One, I think it's a question that should be examined and investigated definitely because it's important. But this is so clear that it's owned, it's wholly owned by a foreign adversary, that they are the dominant controller. That's it's one thing to be influenced and it's another thing to be owned.

• 49:10Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right.

• 49:11Speaker 01

  And this is divestment to if by a company that is owned, not influenced. Like this is so far beyond just general influence. And again, that that kind of question of is Elon influenced is is a very two steps, three steps because of Tesla's growth ambitions in China, it could mean he's making product decisions. So that's not going to be in any way. This bill, the language of it would never ever touch that.

• 49:35Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, exactly. I mean, if you're going to start asking those questions, then you got to ask about Apple, right? Like the list goes on.

• 49:40Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah, exactly.

• 49:42Alex Kantrowitz?

  Anyway, yeah, I do think the bill as constructed is pretty good. I will miss TikTok if it goes. I like using TikTok. My usage has been way up this week. I guess TikTok has been like sending notifications and things like that. And I've just been like, oh yeah, forgot about TikTok. It's such in the mind. They must have like the best usage going. But I, you know, I'm Totally, if they ban it, they ban it. And like Solana and I talked about on the, on the show on Wednesday, like so be it, we'll get over it and Meta will get better. That's it.

• 50:11Speaker 01

  Well, and or they divest it. But to me, the, the tell in all this.

• 50:15Alex Kantrowitz?

  No, they're not divesting. They're not.

• 50:17Speaker 01

  No, of course not. Of course not.

• 50:18Alex Kantrowitz?

  There, this thing will either be, be not, the bill won't pass or TikTok will get banned. I'm sure of that.

• 50:23Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, but the, the fact that they are adamant about not divesting is a tell. The CEO, Shou Chu, on like Capitol Hill was interviewed and he's like,

• 50:33Alex Kantrowitz?

  Oh, he's terrible. He's awful.

• 50:35Speaker 01

  Well, it's funny because he, he, everyone loved him for a bit and his, uh, you know, his testimony on the.

• 50:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  No, come on. That was awful also. That was bad.

• 50:43Speaker 01

  But, yeah, but the fact that like, to me, the tell is from a public facing perspective, you have a Singaporean and everything they're doing, they moved the headquarters, they tried to push forward, you know, like a non-Chinese national faces as the public faces of TikTok, the app. And then every bit of reporting around any kind of conflict within TikTok, the company's operations are all about people have to go to work earlier because they have meetings with ByteDance managers in China. Like it's so directly integrated and the fact that they want to say, we will not divest, it's, we cannot divest, it's an outright ban.

• 51:23Speaker 01

  And then to the fact that, uh, they're hiding it, like the fact that they're trying to do everything they can to say TikTok is not a Chinese company, I think is just a reminder that it is.

• 51:34Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. But now the Senate, the Senate resistance does lead me to believe that this is not a, despite the fact that it passed the House the way that it did, it's still a real open question of whether this goes through. I'm sticking my prediction, it's not going to get banned.

• 51:47Speaker 01

  I'm still team ban. We'll see.

• 51:50Alex Kantrowitz?

  Let's end on what, what may be the most interesting story of the week. Where is Kate Middleton? So Rajan, I, you're an expert in this, I'm not, but I did, uh, I've spent almost zero time paying attention to the Royals, but I do like technology and, uh, over the weekend, or yeah, was it over the weekend? Or, or, uh, earlier in the week. They they've so she's been basically out of the public eye after an abdominal surgery. And earlier in the week, they posted this photo of her with her kids. And people on Twitter started picking out the fact that this thing was photoshopped like crazy, like nothing lined up, the hair blurred, the fingers were warped in weird ways.

• 52:32Alex Kantrowitz?

  And at a certain point, the Associated Press decides, all right, we are gonna kill this photo. I've never seen this before. They put out this notice. The first official of a photo of Kate, Princess of Wales, since she underwent abdominal surgery nearly two months ago, was pulled from circulation by the Associated Press and several other news organizations because the image appeared to have been manipulated. And then this response is just, it is unbelievable from Kate Middleton. And then I'm gonna let you run with it, Rajan. She goes, like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion

• 53:13Alex Kantrowitz?

  the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother's Day. What?

• 53:21Speaker 01

  Okay, I love this story and I got two rants on it. The first is the, I'm not sure if you had heard the theory. I guess it's more of a theory than a rant, that part of this is driven by the fact that Prince William has been having a potential affair. And this is my favorite British thing.

• 53:41Alex Kantrowitz?

  Allegedly.

• 53:42Speaker 01

  Yeah, allegedly with the Marquez de Chalmandelay is how it's spelled, but it's pronounced Chumlee. That alone, just bringing in who's married to the Earl of Roxavage. Like, the whole thing is just the most awesomely British royal thing. And I have never been interested in the British royal family, but this is pretty fun right now.

• 54:02Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, the Earl of Roxavage, he did everything. He was a great family man. He just tried really hard. He was there for her. And this was always bound to happen to him. No one talks about the Earl of Roxavage.

• 54:14Speaker 01

  Maybe we can get him on the podcast and he can tell his side of the story.

• 54:19Speaker 01

  Maybe you can give some Photoshop. Maybe he knows how to use generative fill in Adobe Photoshop better than the average new graphic designer. But my other rant on this, my other rant, not Kate Middleton, certainly. My other rant on this, though, is I out of the, I should not be annoyed of this, but I am annoyed how everyone is saying AI when it's actual just standard Photoshop errors. Everyone's like, this is AI. This is the future of AI. You can't trust anything. I'm like, this is literally bad photo shopping. This is like, you know, moving stuff around or using standard Photoshop. This has nothing to do with generative AI. Maybe if she used generative fill,

• 55:01Speaker 01

  it would have actually been good. But this is like the conflation with how this could mean AI is going to screw up everything in the world and destroy all trust and increase misinformation, I think, is a complete misdirection here because this is just bad Photoshop. And Kate Middleton is bad at Photoshop if she even.

• 55:23Alex Kantrowitz?

  Well, that's the question I want to ask you. So this, the thing, the weirdest thing about this to me has been the social media statements. I mean, those have been the creepiest ones. First of all, she said, I think she said William took the photo, which like it was a perfectly shot photo. It seemed like, like, that's strange. Like, you don't, most normal people can't take a photo like that. And then she said that she did the photo shopping. I mean, what the hell? Like, do you believe she was doing the photo shopping?

• 55:49Speaker 01

  This is bananas. Yeah, I think.

• 55:52Alex Kantrowitz?

  How do you put a tweet out like that?

• 55:54Speaker 01

  No, but here, here's, here's what's happening. I'll tell you. The royal family.

• 56:01Alex Kantrowitz?

  America and England, listen up. Here we go.

• 56:03Speaker 01

  Due to Harry and Meghan's uptick in fame, obviously, it's been trailing off a little bit, but they certainly got the big Netflix contracts and they got the podcast contracts. What a Spotify, whatever else. They became the influencers. They became more interesting than the actual royal family itself.

• 56:22Speaker 01

  The royal family decided it was time for us to make it become interesting again. And then they they saw on TikTok, maybe they even influenced those initial viral TikToks about Kate Middleton conspiracy theories, but this is all a PR gimmick to become the center of attention once again.

• 56:42Alex Kantrowitz?

  This is my my second favorite conspiracy theory about what's going on with them. My first favorite one is that it's been circulating on social media is that they used Kate's exact face from a Vogue cover for the shot and they like overlay the Vogue cover and then they fade out the Vogue and there's her face. And it's like, people, you put her face on her face.

• 57:04Speaker 01

  Oh, Bellingcat came out.

• 57:07Alex Kantrowitz?

  It's her face.

• 57:07Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 57:08Alex Kantrowitz?

  I'll talk about it, yeah.

• 57:09Speaker 01

  Bellingcat, the investigative journalist operation that kind of is like amazing at understanding the nuance of digital paths and fraud and everything like that. They had a pretty good response to why this is not what it is, but but but the Vogue viral tweets that saying like, I have proven that they're using Vogue. It's actually kind of a it's also maybe it's good for Elon Musk, too, because Twitter feels alive and back again in a way that it hasn't been in a while where, you know, the the the engagement grifters are alive and well. There's fun conspiracy theories going around. There's it's just in a good way, in a healthy way, in a in a harmless, hopefully way. It feels good.

• 57:55Alex Kantrowitz?

  I do think Twitter's gotten a little better, like they've dialed in the algorithm a little bit more. Like, I don't see as many ChatGPT influencers and menswear guys, although I did block menswear guy. I couldn't take that guy anymore.

• 58:05Speaker 01

  Yeah, Kate Middleton saved us from the ChatGPT influencers.

• 58:09Alex Kantrowitz?

  That's right. So, okay, let's end on this. Where is she?

• 58:14Speaker 01

  Where is, I think she's at home watching the numbers come in, roll in and smiling as she realized she just restored the royal family to be the most interesting people in the entire world. And that's something we have not had for a long time. So, congrats, Kate.

• 58:35Alex Kantrowitz?

  Congrats, Kate. And congrats to all of you. You now know the truth behind Kate Middleton's disappearance. All right, Ron, John, thanks so much for joining.

• 58:42Speaker 01

  Have a good weekend and let's keep tabs on Kate, see where she is.

• 58:47Alex Kantrowitz?

  We will. Hopefully we'll have an answer by next week. All right, everybody. Thank you so much for listening and we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.

• 58:57Speaker 02

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' healthcare to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the HouseMajorityPact.com, not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 59:29Speaker 03

  Every mile matters. Whether you're driving your dream car or your daily commuter, the Mobile One team knows that. It's why we created Mobile One Advanced Clean Motor Oil. It cleans your engine in one oil change and helps extend engine life, delivering performance, protection, and cleanliness for vehicles of all ages. All to help keep your engine running like new, whatever you're driving. Visit mobileone.com/advancedclean to learn more.