Pod Insights The Tucker Carlson Show Iran Update: Israel’s Newest Bombing Campaign, the Oncoming War With China and How to Avoid It About this episode Does the Iran war become a conflict with China that we can’t possibly win? Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on how we’re heading down that road.
(00:00) China’s Role in the Iran War
(12:34) Does the US Need a Threat to Survive?
(19:46) Charlie Kirk's Suspicious Murder Investigation
(29:09) The Future of Israel and Iran
(33:05) The Real Reason Israel Is Invading Lebanon
Paid partnerships with:
Defend: Enter code "Tucker" for 20% off your purchase at https://defendcellcam.com
American Financing: NMLS 182334, http://nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-685-5696 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://AmericanFinancing.net/Tucker.
Last Country Supply: No one knows what will happen next. Make sure you’re prepared at https://lastcountrysupply.com/tucker
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:01 Speaker 00 This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai/spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai/spotify.
0:31 Tucker Carlson? Colonel Wilkinson, thank you so much for doing this. I think most Americans understand this as a war between the United States in partnership with Israel against Iran. But there are, of course, a lot of other players acting on this drama, maybe in ways that we don't perceive. China would be the biggest and potentially most threatening to our interests. What is China's role in this conflict?
0:54 Speaker 02 It's a role, I think, forced upon them at the moment. Not that they can't handle it. They seem to be quite adaptable with regard to this very frenetic and indeterminate presidency and empire. But it's forced on them because they didn't think that this was going to happen in the way that it's happened, I think. That is, say, this being the war of choice with Iran. And some things are happening in the war that are probably disturbing to them. For example, the latest completed railroad and their five base road initiative railroads was probably the most strategic one in many ways. It brings China's Pacific ports
1:38 Speaker 02 all the way around on land and then intended was up the Persian Gulf along the old route that we used to resupply the Soviet Union during World War II and eventually into the Caucasus and beyond. And now we're bombing it. Israel and we are bombing that railroad. Now, of course, railroads don't get bombed very well. You could drop all the ordinance in the world on them and they will get a bunch of people out there and repair them pretty quickly. But nonetheless, it shows that there's something more to this war of choice than perhaps even Trump knows about. I'm sure there are people in the Pentagon who know about it that are happening and the world is basically ignorant of it.
2:25 Tucker Carlson? Well, can you expand on that? There are things happening the president doesn't know about, but that some planners at the Pentagon doubt was do. What would those things be?
2:33 Speaker 02 Well, one of them is bombing that railroad. It just started recently with both Israel and the United States making it a principal target. And one of the things they're trying to do, of course, and this is a hugely geostrategic issue that most people don't, I'm not even sure I understand it completely, but if you go back in time to earlier empires, when the real power, cultural, technological, economic, military, and otherwise, was in the east, you see one of the ways that those empires roughly defeated other empires by shifting maritime commerce to the land. Because maritime commerce was simply becoming too expensive for them.
3:17 Speaker 02 They put the Portuguese Empire out of business, for example. And what they did was they shifted along one of their routes, primary routes, was this route China is now using to eventually go up the Persian Gulf and into Azerbaijan and Armenia and Georgia, the Caucasus along northward, marrying up with the other three base road initiative railroads, which, incidentally, have been a dumbraded seriously by the war in Ukraine. Does that ring a bell with anybody geostrategically? They're not emptying into Europe as they were intended to do. They've stopped, pretty much. And what does that do? Well, basically, those railroads mean that instead of two and a half to three days and
3:57 Speaker 02 very expensive maritime shipping for China's Pacific port produce, it's 16 hours into the heart of Europe. That's a huge change, one that will drive a lot of commerce off the seas and will, to a certain extent, negate the Bab al Mandeb, the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal, maybe even the Panama Canal, although China's built that very, very luxurious, state-of-the-art port on the west coast of Peru. But that's looking toward the Pacific and looking toward that aspect of commerce. So don't expect a lot of that to be going through the canal, even. These railroads are a game changer in terms of commerce. And think about this for a moment.
4:41 Speaker 02 In terms of one of the United States' supposedly great strengths, it's maritime power. Because we won't need to police the seas anymore. It'll all be going overland.
4:53 Tucker Carlson? I think a lot of Americans are at a great disadvantage in understanding this because they lack a sense of the mechanics of commerce, products just appear, it's not clear how, and they lack a sense of geography. The idea that Iran, you could reach China from Iran overland, people, I think, lack the perspective of how exactly that would happen. But clearly, the Pentagon understands these questions, right? So they're bombing that railroad for a reason, which would be what, do you think?
5:25 Speaker 02 Well, to set it back and to tell China, we know what they're doing and we don't like it. That route is such a serious threat in and of itself because of what you look at in terms of commerce during the period immediately prior to World War II, when Britain and the United States sneaked into Iran, and I mean that, we sneaked in there, they were Nazi sympathizers at the time, and we built a road and we flanked it with security, and at that time, the Iranians couldn't challenge it very much. And we shipped all manner of goods up that road into the belly of the Soviet Union. Stalingrad would have never
6:07 Speaker 02 held out without that supply route. Hundreds of thousands of trucks and wheel vehicles and other implements of war went up that route. It was second only to Remansk, and in terms of strategic effect, it was more important than Remansk. How many Americans even know that? How many Americans even knew that at the time?
6:27 Tucker Carlson? Right.
6:28 Speaker 02 So it's a real game changer in terms of the United States, if it has to do anything about China viscerally, if it has to go to war with China, if it has to fight them, it's essential that we control these lines of communication, and we're not.
6:46 Tucker Carlson? So what's the Chinese perspective on this?
6:51 Speaker 02 As it has been ever since Deng Xiaoping started capitalism with Chinese characteristics. We do not want a war. We will beat you without a war. We are going to beat you technologically. We're going to beat you culturally. We're going to beat you militarily. We're going to beat you every dimension of power that you can imagine. And this latest edict by Xi Jinping, which the American press has completely missed, as far as I can tell, he put out the latest in a series of edicts that have come from Chinese premieres from Deng Xiaoping on, Hu Jintao was a little bit of an aberration, but that's one reason they got rid of him. But Xi Jinping has been right in there. And this latest one says, we are essentially triumphant
7:36 Speaker 02 in every element of global power but one. Now, we're going to take on that one. And that one is financial control. And that means the renminbi being substituted for the dollar and everything from oil sales to you name it, it will become the transactional and reserve currency. Already is to a great extent for about 40% of the world. They're going to shoot for 60 to 70% of the world. They're going to drive the Bretton Woods system back where it came from. They're going to eliminate SWIFT. They're going to eliminate our ability to sanction countries. That's one of their major purposes. And that's an altruistic purpose for them. They think eliminating our ability to put sanctions on other countries
8:19 Speaker 02 in the world, through which since the turn of this century, we have killed 38 million people, mostly men, women, and children. 38 million people. That rivals Stalin's purges, Mao's Dong's Cultural Revolution. It almost rivals Hitler in terms of the people that he killed directly in World War II. Not the whole war with 100 million casualties, but certainly the people he killed directly. So we're looking at the United States and China looks at us this way. Is having done that damage in the world with our financial system, which allowed us to put primary and secondary sanctions on 30% of the world. Go to OFAC and see how many countries we have under sanction.
9:04 Speaker 02 It's incredible. And these sanctions kill men, women and children over time. We killed 500,000 in Saddam Hussein's Iraq when we had the sanctions on him. Madeleine Albright said, when she was confronted with that statistic, so what? It was worth it. Madeleine want to join Hillary in the world of cretins? She did. This is a, this is a serious issue for China and they want to stop it.
9:29 Tucker Carlson? Well, here's something that thieves count on. Security cameras usually stop where wifi stops, right? Makes sense. If you've got a barn, a job site, equipment parked outside, long driveway, criminals know there's a good chance that nobody is watching this because there's no wifi. And that's why we like defend by tactic cam. It's a new sponsor of this show. Defense cameras don't run on wifi. They run on cellular, just like your phones. They work everywhere. If you've got cell signal, you've got security. Middle of nowhere, edge of your property, construction site, wherever you need it, you don't need wifi. Big difference. And you can see why it matters. So we use these cameras in places where wifi doesn't reach. The setup is super simple.
10:13 Tucker Carlson? You mount the camera, open the defend app and you are live. You get clear footage, night vision alert sent right to your phone. It's great for construction sites, ranches, farms, or anyone with a property that stretches beyond a router. And here's something we really appreciate. Defend does not sell your data, not to tech companies, not to advertisers, not to China, no one. Your footage belongs to you and that's big. Plans start at about five bucks a month. No contract, cancel anytime. Visit defendcellcam.com. That's defendcellcam.
10:44 Speaker 03 We all hear the radio ads about the IRS. They tell you to be afraid, to be scared, and they try to frighten you into calling. I'm not here to do that. Tax Relief Advocates is different. TRA is here to tell you that if you owe money to the IRS, whether it's $5,000, $50,000, or $500,000, we have a solution. It doesn't matter if you're sitting in your car, at work, or with your kids. No matter where you are, call now. 800-576-4705. Don't lose hope. TRA can eliminate or reduce what you owe to the IRS. Generous programs are now available that can give you a fresh start. Our passion is taxes and helping individuals fix their IRS problems. We have over 1,000 5-star reviews on Google and an A+ with the Better Business Bureau.
11:27 Speaker 03 You don't need to be afraid of the IRS any longer. End your tax nightmare today by visiting us online at TRA.com or call 800-576-4705. That's 800-576-4705. Tax Relief Advocates: Real Solutions for Real People.
11:45 Speaker 04 Imagine if every time inverse Kramer or another top investor bought a stock, you bought it too, in your own brokerage account automatically. Well, that now exists and it's called Autopilot. Built by the team behind the viral Pelosi Stock Tracker, Autopilot lets you browse their marketplace of strategies run by proven investors or AI-driven models. Just find one with a high return, connect your personal brokerage account like a Schwab or Robinhood, and every trade they make, you make automatically. Your money never leaves your own account. Autopilot just mirrors the moves. So now, no more guessing, no more staring at charts, and no more checking the market between meetings. Also, over 1.3 billion is already invested.
12:28 Speaker 04 So if you wanted to check it out, search Autopilot in the App Store or go to joinautopilot.com. That's joinautopilot.com. Investing has risks, like the loss of principal.
12:39 Tucker Carlson? It's also a moral state in the United States. And just jumping ahead, it strikes me that once the US government, OFAC, loses the ability to sanction other countries, it will have only the power to sanction American citizens for disobedience with programmable digital currency and will do something very similar to us.
12:56 Speaker 02 Bingo.
12:57 Tucker Carlson? Yeah, I mean, that does seem like, you know.
13:01 Speaker 02 A natural follow on.
13:02 Tucker Carlson? Well, it does seem like it does seem like the things you do to your opponents abroad will be done to your own citizens by the same government.
13:08 Speaker 02 Yes.
13:09 Tucker Carlson? I mean, that seems like a pretty consistent lesson of history. So that's why empires are bad, because they're bad for your own population. But I wonder, like, China, we see our competition with China in primarily military terms, I think. That's what we talk about in public. No one ever talks about the relative size of the economies. It's like, how many aircraft carriers do they have?
13:29 Speaker 02 But that's new. That's new. In my administration, my administration, in George W. Bush's administration, Colin Powell was giving his head on only one major international issue, and that was China. And I was there when George W. Bush said its importance to Walmart meant Dick needed to stay away from it. And that, he meant that. He meant that we were in strategic economic competition with China. And he didn't mind that because he thought we were better than they were at capitalism. And we should certainly hold our head up in the world in that regard. So he gave Colin Powell his head, and Powell was constantly, constantly thwarting the
14:12 Speaker 02 vice president in those terms because Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney wanted a hot war or a cold war, they preferred the latter, with China. And Bush didn't want it, so he turned Colin loose on Taiwan in particular and wound up at the end of his first term having to repudiate Chen Shui-Byung publicly and tell him to shut up about his independence referendum and get off that kick because he knew that was a red line with Beijing. So that's the last president, I think, we had who understood fundamentally this economic relationship and thought that we could wage it with them and at least tie them, if not win.
14:57 Tucker Carlson? The impulse to go to war with China, like in exchange of ballistic missiles, at least, where does that come from? Why would you want that? Why would Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld and so many others be advocating for that?
15:10 Speaker 02 I don't think they really wanted a hot war, but the thing that scared me and scared Colin Powell, too, was that they seemed to be willing to accept it if they couldn't get the Cold War. But what they really wanted was a replacement for the Cold War that would put the same pressures on us that the Cold War did. And that would be good in their sense. Cheney occasionally would reveal things like a statement, "We don't want people to love us, we want people to fear us." And that was okay, but it didn't go over that big with, I think, a genuine Christian, I mean, genuine Christian, a Sermon on the Mount-type Christian
15:51 Speaker 02 that George W. Bush was. And so, in that sense, that pushed him over into Powell's camp. But they wanted that Cold War for sure because they thought, judging from their experience for their whole lives, virtually, that was the only way to keep the empire in power and in check domestically and internationally, is to have that huge pressure on them all the time. And it was also the only way for Halliburton and Lockheed Martin and a host of others whom Dick loved and Don loved to make a lot of money.
16:25 Tucker Carlson? But what do you mean when you say a Cold War would be the only way to keep the empire together internally? What does that mean?
16:34 Speaker 02 You need an external enemy. If you've ever read, maybe you're too young, but there was an argument over whether it was a fanciful parody from somebody at The New Yorker, or was it a serious study? It was called The Report from Iron Mountain. It was a pamphlet. Lyndon Johnson, when he said it, when he read it, told his staff to get rid of it, ban it. It didn't happen. The New York Times picked up on it. It went viral. Two issues were put out. In that report, which many thought really was a response to Kennedy's June speech at American University.
17:19 Tucker Carlson? Yes.
17:20 Speaker 02 They said impossible. In that report, they went through all the Cold War parameters and such, and they said impossible. You can never have peace. The only way an empire like the United States of America can survive is to have a constant threat. It must have a threat in order to survive. They did say at the end that if you could dream up some other way of creating the same kind of pressure that that sort of threat did, and they even said, religion used to do that. You know, the monarchs, the prince, the prelate, they used to threaten the people with God. And that, and that pretty much kept them in line. You're going to burn in hell if you don't do what I tell you to do, that sort of thing.
18:03 Speaker 02 Corkmata, looking at the Muslims and saying, repent, become a Christian, or I'll cut your throat. And that's what he did. If they didn't repent, many of them repented. You could have that, but they thought that was passe, that that kind of threat wouldn't do the sort of thing that an actual state threat would do. And so their conclusion was Kennedy was nuts. You needed that kind of external threat to keep a country as variegated, as diverse, and as ultimately powerful as America was, in check. You needed that kind of threat.
18:38 Tucker Carlson? To keep your own citizens obedient?
18:41 Speaker 02 Yes, very much so. That's a part of it, too, to keep them toeing the line and to keep them paying their taxes and everything that you do in a state that once was a republic and now is an empire.
18:53 Tucker Carlson? This is not at all related to I asked you to have this conversation, but I can't resist. Who do you think did kill Kennedy?
19:03 Speaker 02 I'm fairly certain, after a lot of study, I'm a hunter. I know weapons fairly well. I know that weapon that Lee Harvey Oswald wielded, no way it shot John Kennedy and killed him. I don't even think he could hit him from there. You know, the FBI guy, the expert, tried with that very weapon, three times, to simulate the Zaprueder film intervals and get that many rounds off, even get them off, not just accurately, and he couldn't do it. I think it was a combination of CIA, mafia, and probably Pentagon, and I don't mean organizationally, but I mean dissenters in all three of those groups.
19:46 Tucker Carlson? And the motive would be what?
19:49 Speaker 02 They thought, especially with what he had done with regard to Cuba in October 62, and then the speech in June 10th, I think, of 1963 at American University, that he was serious. He was serious, and his brother was serious with regard to the mafia and policing it up. But Kennedy himself, the president, was serious about seeking first rapport with the Soviet Union. Cuba had really, and Berlin too. Berlin was a more serious crisis in the hot summer of 61 than Cuba was. Cuba was 13 days packed into, you know, dynamism and the UN and everything else. And we thought it was serious. Well, Berlin was strategic
20:33 Speaker 02 for the Russians. If the GDR disappeared, and it was disappearing at about 10,000 citizens a week, think of that for a minute. We helped them build the wall. We actually helped them build that wall. When I say helped, I mean our tanks, our machine guns oversaw the parties building the wall to prevent anyone from interfering with them. We let them build the wall because that was the only way to stanch that flow out of the GDR, East Germany. And that was strategic for the Russians. So that was a much more serious crisis. But he'd gone through both of those, and he knew how close we'd come to an exchange of nuclear weapons, and he wanted an end to that. And they thought this was ephemeral wishes and
21:16 Speaker 02 even dangerous wishes. They thought that Soviets would pull a trick on us, you know, all the things you usually throw out there when you don't trust your enemy. And they were willing to take him out in order to prevent that from happening. And they were mad at him for the Bay of Pigs.
21:32 Tucker Carlson? Where do you think Jack Ruby came from?
21:35 Speaker 02 They found him somewhere. I was at Baylor University at that time, and I remember when the announcement was made, I was absolutely stunned. Me and my roommate could barely talk for about a half an hour. The president's just been shot not too far from us. We were in Waco. And then we were on the TV and we watched this guy walk up to Ruby and shoot him right there. And we, at that moment, Bob and I said to ourselves, this stinks. This really stinks.
22:06 Tucker Carlson? Yeah. When the lone gunman kills the lone gunman, they're probably not lone gunmen.
22:09 Speaker 02 Nah, you got it. You think about Charlie Kirk, for example, and what's happening right now with that assassination, which I can't even tell you what's happening. I don't even know. The FBI has been so unforthcoming. But I know, I told you, I'm a weapons guy. That did not happen the way they're saying it happened. And I doubt very seriously if that guy stuck a .3006 down his pants leg and walked away.
22:33 Tucker Carlson? Cost of living is already making it hard to live here, and it's not getting any better. Unfortunately, it's likely to get worse. And a lot of Americans fill the gap with credit cards, not just for fancy dinners, but to cover things like groceries and bills. That is a disaster. It's understandable, but don't go down that road because there is a tax in effect, a survival tax of 20% interest or more. Why would you do that? Why would you hand money to the big banks when you can keep it for your family? Our friends at American Financing have a better way. If you're looking to buy your first home or refinance your current one, they're helping Americans achieve the dream of home ownership with monthly mortgage rates currently in the fives. American Financing saves its customers an
23:14 Tucker Carlson? average of 800 bucks per month. That's nearly 10 grand every year back to you. This isn't just a loan, it's a total financial reset. So debt is tough, but there's a smart way to do it and a reckless, self-destructive way to do it, credit cards. And so we recommend American Financing. They're salary-based, not commission-based, which means they actually work for you, not the banks. They're called America's home for home loans for a reason. Call 800-685-5696, 800-685-5696, or visit americanfinancing.net/
23:51 Speaker 00 Now for a quick message from Anthropic, the team behind Claude, the AI built for businesses. Customers count on their bank, and banks count on their most important systems. Now those systems count on Claude, and nine of the Fortune 10 companies use it for critical work. See why leading companies trust Claude at claude.ai/span.
24:15 Speaker 05 Visible puts the ultimate wireless hack in the palm of your hand. With unlimited 5G wireless data and hotspot, designed to keep you connected, powered by Verizon's 5G network. And no contract holding you back. Plans start at $25 a month. Or get the premium Visible Plus Pro Plan and save $10 on your first month when you use promo code HACK. Make the switch at visible.com. Terms apply. See visible.com for details.
24:45 Tucker Carlson? Tucker. It's, uh, yeah. I mean, I think it's pretty clear that the investigation into that has not been as full as Charlie's family and the rest of us deserve. I mean, there's no question about that. So, and I'm sorry to get you sidetracked, but you're obviously really knowledgeable, and I hope you'll come back, by the way, at some point. But back to China. So the United States is, and with Israel, blowing up Chinese-built infrastructure. So that seems like a big step. And it seems like in so doing, you could, like, risk Chinese further participation in this, in this conflict. Are we risking that?
25:21 Speaker 02 I think we are. We're not at the cusp yet, I don't think. I'm, I'm waiting to see just exactly how we deal with all the Chinese shipping. That would be, I think, a deal breaker and perhaps get China more infuriated and maybe even doing more than she's already doing. But I know too, I've been in the Central Party School, one of the few Americans who had. I, I've been in China since 1984 and almost every other year or so. And I've done simulations in Beijing with the Chinese. In fact, I did one in 2009 that was called, are you ready for this? The Oil Disruption Exercise.
26:04 Speaker 02 We had everybody there. We had Merad, we had AIG, we had Lloyds of London, we had all the countries involved. And we took down Ros Tenora at that time, about eight million barrels per day, productive capacity. And West Texas Intermediate Brent crude went to $200 almost overnight. Shippers wouldn't ship, insurers wouldn't insure. And of course, everyone in the room, including the Chinese, this was very instructive, but this was 2009, agreed to allow the United States Navy and the group of five led by Singapore with their little navy, about one ship per country, police the Strait of Malacca, because that's where we were threatening another act, and let the United States Navy almost exclusively
26:49 Speaker 02 clear the Strait of Hormuz and fix the situation at Ros Tenora. And all it took at that time, because we were much bigger, we put ships in there, we put an aircraft carrier, not too much different from Lincoln right now. And that calmed things down. And people began to realize that if there were problems, further problems, because this was a terrorist attack on Ros Tenora that we postulated. If things were to get out of hand again, the United States Navy was there. And other allied navies were there too. So it calmed down and oil went down again. But very, very dicey moment. It was so dicey on the game floor, Tucker. I've never seen this before. And I've done hundreds of simulations. The
27:34 Speaker 02 Chinese actually, when the move to shift oil reserves around the world to take care of this problem, so there wouldn't be a real global depression develop, had to go back to their Ministry of Foreign Affairs and consult before they could come back to the game floor and make a decision. Chaz Freeman, Ambassador Chaz Freeman was there with us. And at breakfast the next day, they didn't know Chaz was fluent in Mandarin. I couldn't believe that, but they didn't. Their intelligence had failed them on that. So we're at breakfast and I said, Chaz, what was said? And he told me what was said. It was interesting. I mean, they were actually seriously worried about making a decision that took oil at that moment
28:18 Speaker 02 away from China and say, gave it to Korea or gave it to some other country like Japan that needed it more desperately than they did, because that's what we did for a time. We divided the oil flows up around the world so they'd be more economic and more helpful, the countries that were being hurt. That was the last time I saw a real camaraderie between, I think that's a fair term to use too, between Chinese diplomats, Chinese, you know, we knew that probably 10% of the Chinese delegation was intel. Ours was too. But that was the last time I saw comity and I saw willingness to work together
29:00 Speaker 02 in a significant way. And that was a dicey situation, very dicey on the game floor.
29:07 Tucker Carlson? How does it get reopened now, do you think?
29:10 Speaker 02 I think it's going to have to be the force of the, of the reality of what we're doing to the globe. I'm looking very closely at economic analyses that tell me by the end of June, if we're not back to reasonable shipping again, we'll be certainly in recession, global recession. And if we go to the end of August, we might be in global depression. And Putin and, and Trump can say over and over again that we have plenty of LNG and plenty of oil and everything. It doesn't matter. You're not going to survive in that kind of autarkic sense. Economically, you're going, you're going to crash too. So we would be looking, I think, at not only that coming to impact us
29:55 Speaker 02 and at the same time, our incredible debt, coupled with the fact that Xi Jinping would probably accelerate the replacement of the dollar with renminbi because there'd be a moment to do it.
30:08 Tucker Carlson? Yeah.
30:10 Tucker Carlson? So at that point, I mean, you can see chaos, right? I mean, economic, right? And the lengths the Roosevelt administration went to keep the country stable, including authoritarian lengths. I mean, that was their single-minded obsession. Like, depression means people get restive and scary.
30:28 Speaker 02 I just read the history of the, I didn't even know it existed, and a historian lives in Falls Church, he's an old dude, he gave me a copy of it, almost, I almost dropped it, it's so thick. It's called Recalled, the Civilian Conservation Corps. It's a wonderful book. It's just full of pictures, but you, you see what Roosevelt had to do. And the fact that ultimately he had to order the army in to do that, principally the army became the ingredient of the CCC that made it work.
30:59 Tucker Carlson? And who ran it? Everyone forgets who ran the CCC.
31:02 Speaker 02 Yes.
31:03 Tucker Carlson? MacArthur.
31:04 Speaker 02 Yep, yep. But MacArthur was, MacArthur was an interesting character in Roosevelt administration. More than once FDR said things that made anyone around him realize he knew how dangerous Doug MacArthur was, in every sense of the term. And after the Bonus Marchers and MacArthur's attempt to kill them, Eisenhower was his aide at that time, and you see Eisenhower in some of the pictures in this book, as a matter of fact. I think FDR had a real weather eye for MacArthur, but he made a huge mistake, and he made it because he was frightened of him. He should never have divided command in the Pacific.
31:48 Speaker 02 It cost 100,000 American casualties between Nimitz and MacArthur. Put MacArthur in charge if you've got to do that, but no, Stark and King wouldn't let him, so he had to compensate Stark and King and the Navy and give them the Central Pacific, MacArthur the Southwest Pacific. We had a bloody strategy in the center, a bloody strategy. We didn't have to take half of those islands. MacArthur showed us what to do. You just bypass them and let them wither.
32:16 Tucker Carlson? Exactly.
32:17 Speaker 02 You don't attack them, but we attacked them in the Central Pacific.
32:23 Tucker Carlson? What do you think Israel will do and will have to do if come June or July or August, when the economic effects become impossible to ignore, dangerous to everybody, regimes around the world teeter and fall in the face of recession and depression, and the United States says, you know, we're just, we're out? That leaves the Iranian regime in charge, really in charge, and more powerful than it was on a, you know, February 27th. Can Israel live with that?
32:55 Speaker 02 I think not. And you probably know what I think about the Jewish state of Israel. I don't think it has a long writ on life. I don't think it can survive in the Levant, because the original conception was a safe haven, and it's anything but a safe haven, and that's been demonstrated markedly to all of its Jewish citizens, many of whom have left. And probably more would have left if Netanyahu would let them. So I think it can survive as a democracy, a true democracy, that is to say Palestinian Arabs, Christians, everyone living there, and Jews living there with them. And I don't buy the power of the womb bit. I don't think that would be so overwhelmingly quick that you couldn't adjust the democracy
33:40 Speaker 02 to be a real democracy, even if the Jewish citizens of it suddenly became a minority. Or I don't think it would be suddenly, as I said, I think it'd be over time. But they don't want to do that, and so I think they're sealing their own demise as a state at all in the Levant, democratic or otherwise. And so you're right, it's a dangerous situation, and what we're doing in Lebanon right now is just unconscionable. West Bank is bad enough, but Lebanon, we're killing 200 or 300 civilians about every 48 or 96 hours, and they're just civilians. We're bombing dry cleaners, we're bombing bars, we're bombing restaurants, we're bombing hotels.
34:21 Speaker 02 We, I say, I always say "we" because Israel couldn't do it without us. And it's, we built the most expensive, largest embassy in the world. Where'd we build it? We built it in Beirut. Why did we do that? Well, it isn't for diplomacy. We built it there because it's a haven for Mossad, MI6, and CIA. And because we plan on, in that center piece in the Eastern Mediterranean, mounting our guns against China and Russia too, if we have to. But we don't have any respect for Lebanon. Lebanon could disappear tomorrow morning. Our embassy would still be there, fortified to the hill, of course. We just don't care anymore. And we're lashed up with the wrong people in Lebanon. We always have been, really.
35:07 Tucker Carlson? Who are the right people in Lebanon?
35:10 Speaker 02 The right people are the people that Hassan Nasrallah was trying to introduce to the political situation, cease his militaristic angle, and become the politician in Lebanon who would finally, after years and years, consolidate the government and have a government that the majority of Lebanese could support. And Netanyahu, what did Netanyahu do? Of course, that's what he kills, the people he needs.
35:35 Tucker Carlson? We pray that the war with Iran ends immediately, but the truth is, it doesn't seem to be. If you're the head of household, you need to think through what this could mean for you and the people you're in charge of. Don't wait for disaster to strike to ensure that you have the basics covered: food, water, light, energy. And that's exactly why we started a company called Last Country Supply. It's our store. It carries the same preparedness products that we have, well, in this barn, for example. The products that give any head of household peace of mind, knowing that if something bad happened, you could take care of the people you're responsible for. So continue to pray for an end to war and violence, but also, at the same time, make sure that your family is ready. Stock up on the products that we trust at lastcountrysupply.com/talk.
36:21 Speaker 00 Now for a quick message from Anthropic, the team behind Claude, the AI built for businesses. Customers count on their bank, and banks count on their most important systems. Now those systems count on Claude, and nine of the Fortune 10 companies use it for critical work. See why leading companies trust Claude at claude.ai/span.
36:46 Tucker Carlson? So, I mean, what is Israel's goal in Lebanon? Israelis say, I don't know if it's true, but that the IDF is just stretched to breaking, can't possibly occupy southern Lebanon, much less Beirut all the way down. So, like, what is the point of this?
37:06 Speaker 02 I've always thought that Israel's real policies, and I've been associated with this for 50 years, with respect to Lebanon, was demolishing periodically its economic capacity. Remember, Lebanon way back there was the pearl of the eastern Mediterranean.
37:27 Tucker Carlson? Oh, yes.
37:28 Speaker 02 It's a place where everybody wanted to go. Beirut was beautiful. And Israel then came along. And Israel became, on our dollar, to a certain extent, a very capitalistic, predatory capitalistic and successful in that regard, economy, and wanted to stay that way and even wanted to grow and grow and bring in other people to that economy, under the Jewish writ, of course. But nonetheless, come in, Abraham Accords being one latest example. And so, they had to take Lebanon down a peg every time. If you go back and examine those bombing campaigns, even the 82 invasion, when they
38:09 Speaker 02 were really after PLO and Arafat, they bombed the bejesus out of the economic structure of Lebanon. At the time, we military officers were saying, "Why are they doing that? That's just making them hate them. Why are they doing that? They don't need to do that." And then, you know, stupid us, we figured it out after about two or three iterations. They're bombing the hell out of their economic might, so they can't, you know, 10 years to get back up again. Then they bomb them again.
38:37 Tucker Carlson? That's very, very dark. I mean, and we paid for it. So what do you, what do you, I mean, President Trump didn't explain really why he began this war, other than to say Iran can't have a nuke, which is not an adequate explanation. What do you think the, the real motive was in starting a war with Iran?
39:00 Speaker 02 I think that New York Times piece, as much as I hate to praise the great lady these days, was probably fairly accurate. I think most of his advisors, the, the principal ones anyway, were saying no, or, you know, arguing negatively. And Netanyahu persuaded him to do it. Now, why did he listen to Netanyahu when everyone else, the ants, probably everyone but Hegseth, was at least somewhat opposed, if not strongly opposed, which I'm told with some reliable information that Kane was, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
39:39 Speaker 02 and others on the military, in the military. It was persuasive because Netanyahu said it. And I can't tell you whether it was Miriam Adelson's millions, or Trump's, I don't think he's got a real high regard for Bibi Netanyahu, in terms of loving him. But something there told him, indicated to him that he needed to go against all of his advisors and follow Netanyahu's recommended course of action, which of course, I think is disastrous. And yet he did.
40:13 Tucker Carlson? Does America's relationship with Israel change after this is over?
40:19 Speaker 02 I don't see how it can remain the same with a new president who's got to pick up on what's happening with the American people. Not least of which caused by Charlie Kirk. What's happening with the American people, even in the core of MAGA, under 40 in particular, and under 20 on college campuses and things like that, generally, is don't like Israel, period. Even I could use a stronger word than don't like.
40:53 Tucker Carlson? Why do you connect that to Charlie Kirk?
40:57 Speaker 02 Because I think he was changing his mind and it was obvious he was changing his mind about being so attached to Israel, both in terms of US security and in terms of just the American people. I think he was beginning to realize that it was poisonous and that was dangerous. I don't for a minute think that we might not find out down the road something about his assassination that resembles Kennedy's and Martin Luther King's and others who've been shot in our country, which is, you know, for people overseas sometimes whom I talk to infrequently now, but used to talk to a lot, like in France and England and Germany.
41:40 Speaker 02 They don't understand why we kill people at the rate we kill people, you know, and it's America. I say, wait a minute, wait a minute, and they'll tick them off, you know, all the way back to Roosevelt becoming president, you know, because they thought they got rid of him as vice president and all of a sudden McKinley's killed. They'll tick those things off all the way back to Lincoln and they'll say, you're a pretty violent country. You assassinate people quite frequently.
42:04 Tucker Carlson? So it's, I've had a very similar experience in every country I've ever been to other than this one. They don't buy it, but I want, I mean, but you think that's, that's correct. It's pretty obvious that lone gunmen seem to kill people who were a challenge to entrench power and maybe that's not an accident.
42:27 Speaker 02 Yes, yes. More often than not, I think it's not an accident. I just, if you go back and you look at any of the empires of old, but particularly the Eastern and Western Roman Empire, the Eastern figured it out by the time it came, the Byzantine Empire and Constantinople turned around on the then ruling entities.
42:54 Speaker 02 Adaptation of Christianity and mellowed out a little bit.
42:58 Tucker Carlson? Yeah.
42:59 Speaker 02 That famous period there probably extended their life by years, if not decades and generations. If you look at those people at the head of those groups, whether it's like Mary Beard's new book, The Twelve Caesars, Suetonius's Twelve Caesars, between Julius crossing the Rubicon and walking decidedly into assassination, even though he was warned multiple times, should have known, walks into the Senate, he's assassinated and then Octavian and the civil war start and then Octavian becomes Augustus and consolidates the empire and the Roman Republic is gone, gone, totally gone. And you look at the period that she
43:41 Speaker 02 writes about, those twelve Caesars, roughly between Julius Caesar and Suetonius, and you see the depravity. You see Epstein all through it, you know?
43:51 Tucker Carlson? Yeah.
43:52 Speaker 02 And you understand what that does to you. Well, from since forty-five, arguably, with the Cold War as a check on us, and then since the end of the Cold War with no check whatsoever, we have turned into that version of the Western Roman Empire.
44:09 Tucker Carlson? Ah, it's distressing to see it. Can I ask you a bigger question? I remember when I was much younger and I would run into guys, you know, your age who'd served at, you know, the highest levels of government in Washington, and they were always much more open to the existence of conspiracies. And I just wonder if, you know, we deride conspiracy theories, but the people who seem to believe in them the most are also the most knowledgeable. Have you, have you noticed that?
44:39 Speaker 02 I have noticed that, yes. And the people who could talk about them most explicitly and carefully in, in chambers, as it were.
44:47 Tucker Carlson? Yes.
44:48 Speaker 02 They're those people.
44:50 Tucker Carlson? That's so interesting. So when you were, I don't know, thirty, you probably didn't believe that that stuff was real, I assume.
44:59 Speaker 02 I did not. I, I had great faith in my country, great faith in people like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson, a host of others. I knew they were flawed, but I had great faith in their building power and in their faith in what they'd built. I can't say that anymore. I can't say that anymore. And I can even... Particularly with Jefferson, I can even Powell used to quote him to me all the time because he loved Jefferson's inaugural addresses. He would pick out pieces and like pieces like, I know I shall leave this office much more chagrined than I entered it. You know, that sort of thing.
45:39 Tucker Carlson? Yes.
45:40 Speaker 02 I know I won't survive. My reputation won't survive. Which is one reason why Powell decided in 1995 not to run for president. He essentially said, I understand what Jefferson meant and I'm not willing to suffer it. But anyway, it's been, you know, I'm 81 now and I got to say in the years since I entered in 1993 arguably, or even 89 when I was with him when he was chairman, the highest realms of American power and was exposed to that power. I have really become a cynic about our ability even to survive much longer in a way that is anything like our past.
46:25 Tucker Carlson? What do you think the future holds? Like 10 years out, what will we be looking at?
46:30 Speaker 02 I'm really worried about AI. I'm really worried about it. I don't know if you saw that piece the other day by that gentleman, I forget his name now, from Cambridge, I believe, who sold some of his AI development. He's sort of the Oppenheimer of the AI movement to Google. And he said he was on his bench outside his lab or something and all of a sudden his cellphone rang and it was his AI. It was checking up on him and he had a, you know, an epiphany right there on the bench. This is dangerous, what we're doing.
47:04 Tucker Carlson? Do you have a clear picture of what some of the effects might be?
47:08 Speaker 02 Well, I'm seeing the effects already on young people whom I stay in contact with at GW and GW and Women Mary.
47:19 Speaker 02 I probably had roughly 600 students over the 16 years I taught. And they, a lot of them stay in contact with me. One of them was the EA to Mark Carney. And when Mark ran and was elected in Canada, he got shifted to another guy by Mark. And I said, well, who are you working for now? And he said, Mike Bloomberg. So I have students all over the place. And they stay in touch with me. And they reflect the same angst I have, but in a much more visceral way because it's their future. It's their life. And they're extremely worried about AI.
48:00 Tucker Carlson? Because they think it will eliminate their jobs or eliminate human autonomy?
48:04 Speaker 02 That's part of it, but the latter is the bigger part of it. And there's also a component of it that is there's no way we're going to survive with that in our midst.
48:17 Tucker Carlson? Because?
48:18 Speaker 02 Not as humans. Your human autonomy business is probably as good a description of it as anything else. But there are a couple of them who think we're going to wind up in a huge conflict between AI-generated, AI-led, AI-whatevered robots and ourselves. And, you know, I'm one who has always read and watched science fiction. Because more often than not, there's something in that H.G. Wells piece or that Lucas piece or whatever, Star Trek, pick your, pick your video adaptation. That's true. That's going to come about.
49:01 Speaker 02 And I see, and I think they see too, because they're a much more visual, video-oriented generation than I was. I was mostly the written word-oriented generation. They see that too. They see some of the science fiction that's been most dire, most dour coming about.
49:24 Tucker Carlson? Is there any way to stop it?
49:27 Speaker 02 That's the question of the hour, I think, with regard to it and robotics, too. Are we going to be able to manage it? There was a gentleman not too, too long ago, who made a statement, I think he was a NASA scientist. We have been given incredible powers. We have been given incredible riches, and he was referring to the United States. We have also been given wisdom. The question in the future is going to be, will we use it? Or will we be overcome? I think that's a huge question. And I don't, I don't count myself in the camp of those who think it's impossible to eliminate the human race. It is not impossible.
50:12 Speaker 02 Nuclear weapons, the newest technology in the world, no empire in all of 5,000 years of empires has ever possessed the technological means to destroy itself and others around it. None, not a single one. And to think that human nature will allow us to get through a demise of empire without ultimately trying that method to save it, I think is wishful thinking.
50:44 Tucker Carlson? And we're, we're at that point right now because we're looking at the end of the American empire, looking at an actual threat to Israel. I mean, it'd be, you just described it, that there is an actual threat for the first time in a long time. The greatest threat, right? And that's a nuclear armed power, so.
51:01 Speaker 02 And we're, we're at that point, as you, as you well know, without a single treaty. They're all gone now. Every single one, from the ABM treaty all the way to New START, gone. No treaties.
51:15 Tucker Carlson? So do you think that this administration can navigate a moment, this fraught, without either using or allowing its partner in this to use nuclear weapons?
51:28 Speaker 02 I'm not given confidence by a man who argues with the Pope and dresses up as Jesus, as Jesus Christ for an ad. I mean, I know he probably didn't do that intentionally, but he allowed it to happen. And this argument with Leo is just absurd.
51:45 Tucker Carlson? What do you, what do you, what do you, how would you interpret that?
51:50 Speaker 02 Well, I think he's backing up from it a bit. I wish he'd back up a little more abruptly and a little more apologetically, but it's done. The damage is done and done at a moment when Leo, the first Augustinian, is headed for Africa to go to Augustus's place and sort of celebrate. I mean, it just didn't make, it was bad timing and it was bad juju all around to do that. And I know from my own experience, and it's, as I said, seven decades of sentient experience, anyway, that we've had an effort in this country for a long, long time, very sotovoki, if you will, under the table, to create an American Catholic
52:35 Speaker 02 Church and have our own Pope. And I remember when Leo's rise was first announced, when his selection was announced, I said, ooh, that'll put a stop to that because an American is now the Pope in Rome. But I didn't think long enough. That's not what they want. They want an American Pope and they want an American Catholic Church. Now, right now, I know it's a minority of Catholics, but it is a powerful minority of Catholics and they've been around for at least 100 years, not very successfully around, but nonetheless, they've pursued that for a long time.
53:14 Tucker Carlson? Why would people, and pardon my ignorance, as a birthright Protestant, I wasn't even aware of any of this, why would people want an American Catholic Church?
53:22 Speaker 02 Then they wouldn't have to take any instructions at all from Rome. None at all. Rome would just be out there. There wouldn't be any, any real power of the Pope in Rome. And I suspect doctrinally, they tried to divorce that Pope from the idea of being from God.
53:44 Tucker Carlson? Huh. Are there, is there like an ideological motivation or theological motivation?
53:48 Speaker 02 I think it's all power. I do. I really do. I think people who have come out of great awakenings, and I, by the way, think this is our fourth one. Most historians won't go with me yet, but I bet you in 10 or 20 years, they will look back on this period and they will call it a great awakening. Just like they did the one that produced prohibition and an amendment to the constitution to prohibit alcohol. And then an amendment to rescind it. Very damaging periods in our history, whether it was burning witches or prohibition. That really, that prohibition really generated the momentum for organized crime. Al Capone was the first, you know, organized criminal, if you will.
54:32 Speaker 02 So they're dangerous periods. And if we get out of this one without any more danger, I mean, Hegseth is holding, I got it yesterday. I couldn't believe it. I just couldn't believe that this, this had developed. OSW Protocol Prayer Services have been going on every week for 13 months. And always with the same line. General officers and admirals will have reserved seats in the front rows. All else will sit elsewhere. No one is allowed to come in, but those invited. It's all on the invitation. This is not very American. This is uncommonly un-American, really.
55:15 Speaker 02 The mixed religion and the military, the way Hegseth is doing it, it's very dangerous. And he's also preacher packing, we used to say in South Carolina, putting the rotten strawberries on the bottom and the fresh strawberries on the top, the ranks. He's making sure very carefully that he's eliminating flag and admiral officers who are or might be opposed to the military becoming a defender of Christianity as a national religion.
55:47 Speaker 02 And he's doing the lower ranks too, and he's doing them by doing such things as exceeding Congress's limits on mental category four recruits. They're, think McNamara's 100,000, if you will. They can't even read their name on a guard roster. They usually come from the mountains of West Virginia, or from the interior of Oklahoma, or my state of South Carolina, or Alabama. Hate to blame them, those states, but nonetheless, they produce these people at an alarming rate. And he's getting them in at the tune Congress put a 4% cap on it. Well, he got 11% the last time around. The inspector general, brave man he, went over and told the Congress. And what Hegseth told the Congress when
56:32 Speaker 02 they called him over to testify was, well, we created a school within the Army, this is the Army, and that school taught them how to pass the entrance exam. You don't know what they did, they taught the test. And so then they gave them the test again, and all of a sudden, they leapt up into mental category four. And 7% of them did that, so we didn't exceed your cap. We, we kept your cap, 4%. That's just a dog and pony show. They're taking people in who are, what shall I say? Well, a good, a good example of it,
57:12 Speaker 02 that's very, very illustrative, is the 50 or 60 that go out of basic training into the river there at Fort Jackson, and get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, and are told by the chaplain, when they rise from the water, that they are soldiers for Christ. What Hegseth wants is even the oath changed from, to the Constitution, the oath should be to Jesus Christ.
57:39 Tucker Carlson? But I mean, the the Gospels don't provide any basis for that theology at all. I mean, that's not the Sermon on the Mount would preclude like a lot of things the US military are doing right now in Iran. So I guess my concern would be the corruption of the Gospels by this.
58:01 Speaker 02 Absolutely. And and talk about corruption Franklin Graham in the center courtyard of the Pentagon, where I've been a number of times for ceremonies with old Secretaries of Defense. Once escorted McNamara in there, had a good talk with him about Vietnam as I escorted him. And he was very contrite. He was actually contrite as we walked in. I was a lieutenant colonel at the time. Billy Graham or Franklin Graham, Billy Graham's son, of course, and Billy Graham must be rolling in his grave because I knew him. He was not this way. Franklin Graham gave a sermon for Hegseth on those grounds that
58:40 Speaker 02 would make Ted Cruz happy. He resurrected all the stuff Cruz was talking about in an interview with you, I believe, in from Genesis and talked about how you had to sometimes kill everything in sight, men, women, children, and so forth, in the center courtyard of the Pentagon.
59:03 Tucker Carlson? Well, that's like blasphemy, it seems to me.
59:06 Speaker 02 It is to me, too. I mean, I'm a Christian, but I'm not that kind of Christian.
59:11 Tucker Carlson? Yeah, well, I don't think there is that kind of Christian, is my view. What an amazing, unexpected conversation. I'm sorry to take you on all these different tangents. I hope you will come back because your the scope of your thinking and the grasp of history that you have is is amazing. So I appreciate it. Colonel Wilkinson, thank you very much.
59:30 Speaker 02 Well, I appreciate the opportunity, and I must say I'm impressed with yours, too.
59:35 Tucker Carlson? Well, not, not really, but I, uh, but I'm interested. I think it matters.
59:39 Speaker 02 I, I, I've watched a lot of your interviews and, um, I'm impressed with what I, particularly when you do things like what you did with Ted Cruz.
59:48 Tucker Carlson? Well, that was easy.
59:50 Speaker 02 The very idea, the very idea that I consult Genesis for national security decision making just drove me back against the wall. I couldn't believe that.
1:00:00 Tucker Carlson? Especially when he didn't know it was in Genesis.
1:00:02 Speaker 02 Yeah.
1:00:05 Tucker Carlson? It's unbelievable. Anyway, thank you very much. Great to talk to you.
1:00:08 Speaker 02 Thank you. Take care.
Previous Exposing the Globalist Agenda to Destroy the Family, Sterilize Humanity, and How to Escape It Next Rep. Thomas Massie: Battling the Treachery of Trump’s Republican Party, AIPAC, and the Epstein Class Page updated October 30, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
