Archaeology WARNING: They Secretly Found Antarctica 300 Years Before Us - Graham Hancock

What is ancient astronomy hiding about our true history? Graham Hancock reveals the catastrophe that erased 12,800 years of our past, what the Great Pyramid is actually trying to tell us, and what he refuses to leave unsaid with heart surgery just weeks away. Graham Hancock is a best selling writer and journalist who has spent 3 decades investigating evidence for a lost prehistoric civilisation. He is the author of international bestsellers including 'Fingerprints of the Gods', and is the presenter of the Netflix documentary series 'Ancient Apocalypse'. He explains: ◼ Why the Great Pyramid contains knowledge humans shouldn't have had for another 2,500 years ◼ The ancient maps that show a continent nobody should have known existed yet ◼ How the Amazon rainforest is actually a man-made landscape hiding what's buried beneath ◼ What 80 ayahuasca ceremonies taught him Chapters 00:00:00 Intro 00:02:19 Do Humans Have A Hidden Past? 00:06:18 Did A Global Cataclysm Reset Humanity? 00:11:09 Why Have This Conversation Now? 00:12:17 Why Is Your Work So Controversial? 00:14:35 How Old Is Humanity Really? 00:18:40 The Evidence Behind The Lost Comet Theory 00:19:56 What Truly Defines A Civilization? 00:22:59 Did Humans Survive The Ice Age? 00:24:18 What Were Early Humans Really Like? 00:28:04 The Missing Chapter In Human History 00:29:38 Could We Become The Next Lost Civilization? 00:34:53 How Do We Know These Stories Are True? 00:37:38 The Unsolved Mystery Of The Great Pyramid 00:41:42 The Real Meaning Of The Age Of Aquarius 00:46:47 Did The Ancients Know The Size Of Earth? 00:49:26 Were Ancient Secrets Passed Down Through Time? 00:51:42 Where Did Humanity's Lost Knowledge Go? 00:53:47 Do The Pyramids Point To A Lost Civilization? 00:55:03 Is Something Hidden Beneath The Great Pyramid? 00:56:59 Why Mainstream Science Pushes Back 00:58:21 Alone Inside The Great Pyramid 01:00:04 Ads 01:02:05 What A Lost Civilization Means Today 01:03:02 Should We Rethink Astrology And Telepathy? 01:05:08 New Discoveries Beneath The Amazon 01:08:31 What Shamanism Gets Right 01:09:18 A Journey With Ayahuasca 01:12:26 Strange Experiences From Childhood 01:15:19 Did You Have Nightmares? 01:16:35 Why Being An Outsider Matters 01:17:51 Don't Let Life Pass You By 01:19:51 Are Religion And Spirituality The Same? 01:22:00 Why Do People Experience The Same Psychedelic Visions? 01:25:01 Why Humanity Must Look Inward First 01:28:47 Ads 01:29:48 What Consciousness Really Is 01:32:36 How Illness Changed My Perspective 01:33:30 Why Love Matters Most 01:39:36 What Ancient Civilizations Teach Us Today 01:44:14 The Power Of Independent Thinking 01:46:33 What Will Matter On Your Last Day? 01:47:13 Living Without Judging Others 01:49:36 Will We One Day Worship AI? Enjoyed the episode? Share this link and earn points for every referral - redeem them for exclusive prizes: https://doac-perks.com Follow Graham: Website - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/CDCJTRS Facebook - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/9n9OEkv X - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/7xRxeaW YouTube - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/8UehPfG Instagram - https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/DDp55T2 You can purchase Graham’s book, ‘Visionary: The Mysterious Origins of Human Consciousness’, here: https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/3m3QlBS The Diary Of A CEO: ◼ Join DOAC circle here - https://doaccircle.com/ ◼ Buy The Diary Of A CEO book here - https://smarturl.it/DOACbook ◼ The 1% Diary is back - limited time only: https://bit.ly/3YFbJbt ◼ The Diary Of A CEO Conversation Cards: https://linkly.link/2hm7r ◼ Get email updates - https://bit.ly/diary-of-a-ceo-yt ◼ Follow Steven - https://g2ul0.app.link/gnGqL4IsKKb Sponsors: Cometeer - https://cometeer.com/doac use code DOAC for $20 off Shopify - https://shopify.com/bartlett

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This could be the last time I speak about myself, my work, because there's a chance that I might not make it off the operating table this month. And a journalist who has very bad blood towards me has been trying to publish a story on me for more than two years now. And it will come out in the next month or two. And I didn't want that to be the last word on my life.

• 0:21Steven Bartlett?

  What do you want the last word of your life to be?

• 0:23Speaker 00

  I'm here to communicate about the possibility of a major forgotten episode in the human story. I'm talking about a lost civilisation.

• 0:32Steven Bartlett?

  So most people think civilisation started 6,000 years ago?

• 0:35Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 0:35Steven Bartlett?

  But you believe there's strong evidence that there could have been a previous civilisation?

• 0:39Speaker 00

  20,000 years ago. And I'm going to present the evidence for that here, Stephen. And it suggests a golden age where there was no violence, no cruelty, where great healers and sages were at work. They're extremely sophisticated. However, if you follow the myths further, as I've done, you find something odd happens. You find that they've stepped away from the original purity and become a culture that begins to impose its power on others around the world. And then sewn into those myths is scientific information, which record a gigantic cataclysm, all but wiping out the human race.

• 1:10Steven Bartlett?

  If what you're saying is true, what does that mean for our lives? I guess also our future.

• 1:15Speaker 00

  Well, there's always this feeling in the myths that we brought this upon ourselves. And when I look at our civilisation today, I see a civilisation that ticks all the mythological boxes for the next lost civilisation and that we are most likely to be the cause of that cataclysm ourselves, unless we wake up.

• 1:33Steven Bartlett?

  Graham Hancock, what will you care about on your last day?

• 1:38Speaker 00

  Most of all.

• 1:44Steven Bartlett?

  Guys, I've got a favour to ask before this episode begins. The algorithm, if you follow a show, will deliver you the best episodes from that show very prominently in your feed. So when we have our best episodes on this show, the most shared episodes, the most rated episodes, I would love you to know. And the simple way for you to know that is to hit that follow button. But also, it's the simple, easy, free thing that you can do to help us make this show better. And I would be hugely grateful if you could take a minute on the app you're listening to this on right now and hit that follow button. Thank you so, so, so much.

• 2:18Steven Bartlett?

  Graham Hancock, I guess the first question I wanted to ask you is, what is it you've committed the last more than 30 years of your life to understanding?

• 2:27Speaker 00

  What it is is a puzzle.

• 2:31Speaker 00

  I'm puzzled by aspects of the human past. There could be, and I think there's a lot to suggest there was, a major forgotten episode in the human story. That's why I refer to us as a species with amnesia. And when I use that phrase, I need to give credit to Immanuel Velikovsky, who wrote a book called Mankind in Amnesia. I think we are a species with amnesia. I think we have forgotten something very important in our own past. And when I turn to the experts, I find much of what they say very interesting and very useful, but some of what they say extremely unsatisfactory and not responding to the problems that I have in the past.

• 3:13Speaker 00

  And that's led me to take my own approach to the past, to look at that and to offer readers, because I'm mainly an author, occasionally make TV shows, to offer them an alternative point of view, which is rational and solidly based, but which is contrary to key aspects of the mainstream narrative. We only have decipherable written scripts from the last five and a half thousand years, maximum. Before that, we don't have any writing that we can, at any rate, read. Go back 10, 12, 15, 20,000 years. All you can base it on, from an archaeological point of view, is what they can dig out of the ground.

• 3:56Speaker 00

  And I think what they're missing, the ancients did leave us memories of what they went through. We have myths and traditions and scriptures from all around the world, which record a gigantic cataclysm affecting the human race and all but wiping out the human race. Everybody knows the story of the flood of Noah, of course. The flood of Noah is just one example of hundreds like that, of stories from around the world. Archaeologists pour scorn on Plato's story of Atlantis. But Atlantis is another of those stories that remembers a global flood that wiped out a former era of existence, leaving only a few survivors. And the archaeological response to them is,

• 4:41Speaker 00

  there was a local river flood, they exaggerated it. It was a big deal for them, so they said it happened to the whole world. And I'm sick of archaeologists saying that. This is the memory banks of our species. This is the record, the only record we have of a period before 6,000 years ago. And we shouldn't despise it and scorn it as primitive superstition. We should say, what can we find in here that we can coordinate with scientific facts that we're aware of? Let's see if there's something to this, rather than just dismissing it. Many of these myths contain imagery and a series of numbers. A very important academic study, published in the 1960s, a book called Hamlet's Mill by Giorgio de Santillana,

• 5:24Speaker 00

  professor of the history of science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Heerta von Deschindt, professor of history of science. This is not me speaking. This is major, major historians of science in the 1960s. They found encoded in those myths, numbers and imagery that could only relate to one thing. And that's an obscure astronomical phenomenon called the precession of the equinoxes. I'm not going to go into the technical details, but to observe it and to record it and to predict it, to predict its effects in the future, involves very precise astronomical observations maintained over a very long period of time, hundreds and hundreds of years at least. So here we have myths of a global cataclysm. There is just so much else. There are ancient maps that show the world as it looked during the Ice Age,

• 6:06Speaker 00

  again dismissed as just total coincidence and not significant by archaeology. I feel that archaeology has failed miserably in providing a nurturing, satisfying answer to the questions we all have.

• 6:18Steven Bartlett?

  So when you say global cataclysm, what does that mean? Means that something hit the planet, we were wiped out?

• 6:26Speaker 00

  Yeah, there are a number of options. And again, I need to stress this because there's so much propaganda in this business, I'll be immediately accused of lunatic fringe. The solid science that's been done on this is twofold. One aspect of it, the one that I think, I find most persuasive, is called the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. And this is a mainstream hypothesis, but it is severely criticised within academia. The hypothesis is that about 20,000 years ago, a very large comet came in from deep space and went into orbit around the Sun. This would be a comet of the diameter of 100 kilometres, maybe 200.

• 7:09Speaker 00

  Comes in, gets captured by the Sun's gravity, goes into an orbit. That orbit crosses the orbit of the Earth. While you're dealing with one large object, the chances of getting hit are extremely low. It would be very bad if you did, but very low. Trouble is, nobody disputes this, once comets are caught by the gravitational field of a very large planet or of a Sun, they start to break up into multiple parts. And this is what happened to the Younger Dryas comet. Instead of being a single bullet, it became a shotgun blast. It became thousands and thousands of objects, of which we've catalogued quite a lot, numbers of them. Comet Enki is the best known bit of that former comet. Many of the academics who look at this think that Comet Enki,

• 7:53Speaker 00

  which is about six kilometres in diameter and which does cross the orbit of the Earth, they think that that was the source comet. But whereas the other team are saying, no, that's a bit of the source comet. There were many other bits as well. And 12,800 years ago, 12,860 approximately, the Earth went into a storm of these fragments. None of them big enough to compare with the object that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. But all over the world, the Earth is turning. This stuff comes in. They found it in the west coast of North America. They found it in Belgium and they found it as far east as Syria. So it's like the Earth turns and this stuff is just coming in. Most of it is blowing up in the air. It isn't even hitting the ground.

• 8:36Speaker 00

  But an air burst from an object that might be 100 metres in diameter is equivalent to a very substantial nuclear blast. So their argument is the Earth was hit by a comet storm. And this, they then argue, and I think they're right, explains what happened then. Because 12,800 years ago, we were still in the Ice Age, but the Earth was coming out of the Ice Age. In fact, for about 1,000, maybe 2,000 years before that, the Earth had been getting warmer, getting quite nice. And you would normally expect that to continue. But then suddenly, 12,800 years ago, give or take 60 years, there's a huge interruption, there's a radical change. The Earth, instead of warming,

• 9:19Speaker 00

  it suddenly goes back into a massive deep freeze. And this is the time when all the famous big animals of the Ice Age, the megafauna, are wiped out. The woolly mammoths, the mastodons, the giant sloths. These things are like 14 feet tall, you know? They're all wiped out in that window around about 12,800 years ago. And most important of all, there's a very mysterious sea level rise that occurs then. This you would not expect when the Earth is entering a cold phase. Normally, when the Earth enters a cold phase, ice accumulates on the existing ice caps. It doesn't melt and go into the sea. So the next thing is, how do we explain this sudden rise in sea levels at the beginning of Younger Dryas? It shouldn't have happened.

• 10:03Speaker 00

  The comet theory explains it perfectly. The mass, the impact, the heat, the air bursts, that would have been enough to send the ice sheets into meltdown and to cause this pulse of meltwater. Then the freeze sets in. You have about 1,200 years of freezing desperately cold conditions. And then again, 11,600 years ago, wumph, it suddenly warms up. I mean, these are radical climate changes. They're beyond anything that's happening now. And I think explanations are needed for them. And because 12,800 years ago may sound a long time ago, but it's really yesterday in the human story. So something very big happened to the Earth and happened to our ancestors 12,800 years ago.

• 10:47Speaker 00

  If it wasn't a comet, another theory that's been put forward is a radical change in solar activity. This might have been involved with it as well. I don't find that as persuasive as the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. And you know, maybe some other explanation will come up. But what nobody disputes is that the Younger Dryas was a catastrophe. It was global and it had huge effects.

• 11:08Steven Bartlett?

  You chose intentionally to come and have this conversation today. Why today?

• 11:15Speaker 00

  Well, I've been quite unwell, really noticeably unwell, since January, February this year, particularly very, very short of breath. It's because one of the failed valves in my heart is causing blood to regurgitate inside the heart rather than pumping it through the body. And that means that oxygenated blood is not getting to my lungs. I probably would live another two or three years without the surgery, maybe even five. But the quality of life would be very low. I can't even walk up three stairs without being exhausted at the moment. So I've definitely decided to have the surgery. Why am I doing this interview now, rather than postponing it until after the surgery and I've recovered? Well, there's a tiny chance, absolutely miniscule chance,

• 11:59Speaker 00

  that I might not make it off the operating table.

• 12:01Steven Bartlett?

  This month?

• 12:02Speaker 00

  Yeah, this month. And if that were the case, this would be the last time I've spoken about myself, my work, my life, challenges I've faced in an open forum like this. And I choose to do that, and I'm going to say specifically why, without mentioning names. I choose to do that because a journalist who has very bad blood towards me has been trying to publish a story on me for more than two years now. And it will come out in the next month or two. And I didn't want that to be the last word on my life. That's why I'm here, Stephen.

• 12:43Steven Bartlett?

  What do you want the last word of your life to be?

• 12:46Speaker 00

  I would, I would hope that people will come to understand that I'm not the person that a very small minority of archaeologists have mobilised social media to present me as. I'm not a grifter, I'm not a hoaxer, I'm not a con man. I'm deeply committed to this. I've devoted my life to it for more than 30 years. I'm passionate about it, it matters to me. And I think, again, I'll be laughed at for saying this, but I feel called to do this. I feel, I feel it's my obligation and my responsibility to do this.

• 13:21Steven Bartlett?

  How is that disputed? Because I guess I need to understand human history, to understand why the fundamental belief that you have that there was a civilisation that we aren't talking about?

• 13:33Speaker 00

  I'd like to be clear, it's not a belief. This is another, it's a mistake that my critics often make. They think that I'm dealing with some sort of belief system or some sort of cult here. No, I'm not. I'm just puzzled, I'm just puzzled by the past. And I'm puzzled by the memories that have been passed down to us. And I'm puzzled that those memories concur all around the world on a serious cataclysmic event.

• 13:59Steven Bartlett?

  What is it that your people that aren't puzzled and are certain believe?

• 14:04Speaker 00

  Yeah, they think that glacial lakes in North America gradually grew in size and overspilled the ice dams that held them in place. And that the water from those lakes, some of it went into the Atlantic Ocean and cut the Gulf Stream. I don't dispute that. Glacial lakes were involved, but those lakes were filled up at a massive speed. Nobody disputes that the Younger Dryas was a cataclysmic event. It's just the degree of the cataclysm that's disputed and what caused it that's disputed.

• 14:35Steven Bartlett?

  But everyone agrees that humans are 315,000 years old?

• 14:40Speaker 00

  Yes, I mean, at present. When I started on this quest back in the late 80s, early 90s, it was felt that anatomically modern human beings had not existed for more than 50,000 years, very recent really. But this turned out to be complete rubbish because anatomically modern humans are much older than 50,000 years ago. We have 196,000 year old anatomically modern human remains from Ethiopia. And then finally, 315,000 years ago, a recent find in Djibouti, Houd, in Morocco, again anatomically modern humans.

• 15:19Speaker 00

  So we can say that if we define ourselves by our anatomy, brain size, capacity of the skull, if we define ourselves in those ways, we've been around for at least 315,000 years and probably much longer. That's just an accident of discovery. And that's one of the things that puzzles me. If we're anatomically modern, if we've got all the modern kit, if we've got the same brains, we've got the same neurology, everything is there. Why do we wait more than 300,000 years to establish something recognisable as a human civilisation? Why do we wait so long? We got all the kit. There's evidence that our ancestors were aware of agriculture,

• 16:03Speaker 00

  just chose not to use it much, much, much earlier than that. The complex of events that leads to a city-based civilisation, which is the kind of civilisation we have now all over the world, that you can only really trace that back to 6,000 years ago. Yes, you can say that before 6,000 years ago, there was build-up to what became the high civilisations. But my question is, why not much earlier? Why did we wait until that moment? And I don't find a satisfactory answer to that question, except perhaps we didn't wait. Perhaps we're missing part of our story. And when I say a lost civilisation, I do not mean a civilisation like ours.

• 16:47Speaker 00

  I do not mean an industrial civilisation. I don't mean they had cell phones or flew to the moon or any of that bullshit. I think they were a very different civilisation from ours. But they had conquered a number of peaks. And one of those peaks was navigation and ocean seafaring, hence the survival of maps, which show the world as it looked during the Ice Age. And another was astronomy. And another really important breakthrough evidenced by the ancient maps, particularly a category of maps called the portolano's, is accurate relative longitudes. This is the Orontius Phineus map. It shows Antarctica right there.

• 17:28Speaker 00

  And this is interesting because this map was drawn in 1531. The problem is that our civilisation didn't discover Antarctica until 1820. So its appearance on a map drawn in 1521, particularly when we know that the map was based on older source maps and the mapmaker tells us in his own legend that he has uncovered material previously hidden in darkness. When we find that, we have to begin to wonder what is going on here. Had somebody found Antarctica long before, long before we did and mapped it with extremely accurate relative longitudes? And that's important because our civilisation

• 18:11Speaker 00

  didn't crack the longitude problem until the mid 18th century. What that meant was that if you're on a vessel sailing west or east, you might be 300 miles closer to a coastline than you think you are. And suddenly, you're on it in the night and you're dead. Once you've got longitude work out, you know exactly where you are. We didn't get that until 1750, 1760, thereabouts, with Harrison's chronometer. So finding good longitudes on very ancient maps is another puzzle that I don't think archaeology solved.

• 18:40Steven Bartlett?

  So you think there could have been a civilisation 20,000 years ago, which was before this Young Dryas moment?

• 18:45Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 18:45Steven Bartlett?

  Where, I mean, I've got this photo here, which I'll throw up on the screen.

• 18:49Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 18:49Steven Bartlett?

  I think you say it's evidence that something took place.

• 18:52Speaker 00

  It is, that's the Younger Dryas boundary. And I'm with Alan West, who's one of the scientists from the Comet Research Group, who are working on the Younger Dryas hypothesis. And our hands are on that black stripe running through the middle of the draw. And that is soot, that is evidence of wildfires burning. It's full of nano diamonds, tiny little diamonds, microscopic size, which are a classic product of comet impacts. Microspherules, some platinum, some iridium, all signatures of a cometary impact. And there it is, it's about five inches thick. That layer is the Younger Dryas boundary layer. It dates to 12,800 years ago.

• 19:30Steven Bartlett?

  So for anyone that can't see, it's just like a slice of Earth and there's this black line going through the Earth.

• 19:35Speaker 00

  We're in a draw here where a river has cut a channel and it's exposed the sides of the channel. And on the sides of the channel, we can see this black stripe running through. And that is precisely the Younger Dryas boundary.

• 19:46Steven Bartlett?

  And the current hypothesis from a lot of archaeologists is there wasn't a human civilisation before this point, 12,000 years ago. But you believe there's strong evidence that there could have been?

• 19:55Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 19:56Steven Bartlett?

  So civilisation, then, in your definition of the word, how do you define that? A group of people gathering and working together?

• 20:02Speaker 00

  Fundamentally, it involves the willing organisation or the unwilling organisation of labour. If you look at a site like Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, we have it on our timeline here somewhere. It's 11,600 years old. This is really an extraordinary site. It's a very sophisticated site, it's very large. It consists of large T-shaped megaliths that can weigh up to 20 tonnes. There are precise astronomical alignments in it. This was not done by two or three people working together. This was, well, that's the Gobekli Tepe today, covered by a modern canopy to keep, fair enough, to keep the weather off it because it was previously deliberately buried by its builders.

• 20:47Speaker 00

  But of course, there's much more around. Hundreds and hundreds more pillars are still underground. We know they're there because of ground penetrating radar, but they've not been excavated yet. So this was a major project. And interestingly, the people who built Gobekli Tepe, at the time Gobekli Tepe began, there was no agriculture happening there. They were all hunter-gatherers. Nevertheless, they did something that archaeologists used to say hunter gatherers couldn't do. They organised themselves, they made a huge project, they implemented it and they delivered it. And Gobekli Tepe is not alone. It's one of dozens of sites like that all over Anatolia in Turkey. This was a highly organised, sophisticated hunter gatherer civilisation that was involved in making this place.

• 21:31Steven Bartlett?

  I'm a little bit confused. So if the Ice Age ended 11,700 years ago.

• 21:36Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 21:36Steven Bartlett?

  And Gobekli Tepe is 11,600 years ago. That means there's a hundred year gap between the end of the Ice Age and something as sophisticated as Gobekli Tepe.

• 21:46Speaker 00

  Not exactly, because dates in this frame, they're not spot on accurate dates. Some will say the Ice Age ended 11,600, some will say it ended 11,700 years ago. But the fact is that in this window, the world was warming up again. It was getting better. And that's when this project was created. And the mystery is, mystery for archaeologists anyway, is that it was hunter gatherers. And archaeologists are now having to come to terms with that. You see, the idea was you had to have an agricultural community first in order to create projects like this. Because that allows people to become specialists. If you generate a food surplus that you can rely on, then you can take people with certain skills and say, focus on that.

• 22:31Speaker 00

  Become an astronomer, become an architect, become an engineer and we'll support you in doing that. That was the idea and that was why it was felt that something like Gobekli Tepe couldn't be built until about 6,000 years ago, when there was widespread agriculture. But that turned out not to be true. It was built by hunter gatherers, but within a thousand years of it being built, agriculture becomes present in that whole area.

• 22:53Steven Bartlett?

  Hmm.

• 22:54Speaker 00

  Origins of agriculture are definitely earlier than we've been taught.

• 22:59Steven Bartlett?

  So it's funny because I don't know a lot about the Ice Age, but humans survived the Ice Age?

• 23:03Speaker 00

  Oh God, yes, we did. It's just, it's just, um.

• 23:09Speaker 00

  Where do you want to be during an Ice Age? That's the question.

• 23:12Steven Bartlett?

  What are my options?

• 23:14Speaker 00

  If you were a rational being, which most human beings are, you would immediately exclude Northern Europe. Absolutely no point in being in that frozen miserable wilderness. You'd immediately exclude the northern part of North America too. No point in being there, it's just horrible at that time. Siberia, pretty rough. No, you'd look for the tropics, you'd go, you'd go down close to the equator. You'd go to the places that weren't affected by the Ice Age, that were actually the best real estate on earth. That's where you'd go. That's why if we are looking for a missing episode in the human story, we're wasting our time looking for it in Northern Europe or North America.

• 23:57Speaker 00

  We should be looking for it in Mexico, we should be looking for it in India, we should be looking for it in Indonesia. We should be looking for it around Papua New Guinea. All of these areas that were, that were really great places to live during the Ice Age. That's, that's the kind of place that the sort of civilisation I'm talking about could have thrived.

• 24:18Steven Bartlett?

  What is the difference? You know, because on here it says the earliest known humans were 300,000 odd years ago.

• 24:23Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 24:23Steven Bartlett?

  What is the difference between these humans 300,000 years ago and the civilisation you're describing 20,000 years ago that you believe existed?

• 24:32Speaker 00

  Apart from what is perhaps wrongly described as a slight refinement in human features, natural selection operating on what humans perceive as beauty, I don't know, but otherwise the same.

• 24:44Steven Bartlett?

  The same?

• 24:44Speaker 00

  The same, yeah, yeah. And again, that's not disputed. Nobody's saying that Jebel Irhud, human beings were somehow different from us. They're anatomically modern humans.

• 24:54Steven Bartlett?

  But how did they live versus your definition of a civilisation?

• 24:59Speaker 00

  They lived a simple hunter gatherer life.

• 25:01Steven Bartlett?

  Okay, in small groups.

• 25:02Speaker 00

  Yeah, but somehow around 11,600 years ago, people started accumulating monuments that can only be made with large groups and organised, organised labour. You've got to, you have to have a system, you have to play, can't build something like Gobekli Tepe without planning it out in advance. You've got to draw it out somehow, there has to be a plan. It's not something you just wing. So there has to, there's a missing background to all of that, which bothers me.

• 25:29Steven Bartlett?

  And again, so most people think civilisation started, what, 6,000 years ago?

• 25:34Speaker 00

  Yes, that would be when civilisations become archaeologically visible. So you have ancient Sumer, Mesopotamia, which roughly 3,500, I'm going to use B.C. because everybody's familiar with that. There are roughly 3,500 B.C., which is 5,500 years ago approximately. We start seeing cities being built, we start seeing the beginnings of writing taking place around about the same time. The same thing is happening in Egypt, maybe a couple of hundred years later. But the new work that's being done in Egypt is pushing Egypt much closer to Sumer, narrowing that window. Effectively, you can say that these two civilisations become archaeologically visible at the same time.

• 26:20Speaker 00

  And they're not alone, because on the other side of the world, in Peru, there's a civilisation now recognised called the Karal Suppe civilisation, which built pyramids, which also goes back 5,500 years. And this is one of the mysteries I'm looking at now, is why we have these apparently coincidental emergence of high civilisations in the same window all around the world. Indus Valley civilisation, roughly the same, 5,000 years old. Yeah, we're looking at Karal here, I think, yeah, yeah. And these classic, the feature is these circular plazas in front of them and then the pyramid with a. And, you know, these were not, and not expected in Peru.

• 27:05Speaker 00

  When archaeologists think of Peru, they tend to think of Machu Picchu, the Inca civilisation. That's what gets all the coverage.

• 27:12Steven Bartlett?

  And that's 600 years ago?

• 27:13Speaker 00

  That's 600 years ago, that's yesterday. Whereas these Karal Suppe pyramids, Karal, Aspero, Banduria, Peneco, these ones are much older, thousands of years older. They're extremely sophisticated, they're built with an earthquake proof technology. They, instead of using blocks, they put small stones in textile bags. And those allow a certain amount of shifting, so the thing doesn't collapse in an earthquake. And this is 5,500 years old getting on. So again, not an agricultural civilisation at that time. They're a hunter gatherer civilisation.

• 27:54Speaker 00

  So archaeologists are having to confront a reversal of their model at the moment. And I think there's room in that reversal of the model for a forgotten episode in the human story.

• 28:05Steven Bartlett?

  Tell me about this forgotten episode in the human story.

• 28:08Speaker 00

  Yeah, it's remembered, it's remembered all around the world as a golden age, where there was no violence, no cruelty.

• 28:18Speaker 00

  Where great healers and sages were at work, where powers that are scorned in our society today, such as telepathy and telekinosis, which are regarded as completely non-existent by our scientists, were regarded as a matter of fact of life in this ancient world. That's a civilisation that emerged out of shamanism and made something good. But then, if you follow the myths further, as I've done, you find something odd happens. You find that they've stepped away from the original purity, that they've become

• 29:01Speaker 00

  a culture that begins to impose its power on others around the world. And that's always given as the reason for the cataclysm in the myths, that we angered the gods. It might have been with our noise, it might have been with our irreverence. We angered the gods and they sent a flood. They weren't happy with their creation, they wanted to start again, wipe the slate clean. And so there's this, there's always this feeling in the myths and I can't explain it. I don't know what it comes from, but it's always there, is that in some way, we ourselves brought this upon ourselves.

• 29:37Steven Bartlett?

  Is this, those people not understanding the forces of Mother Nature and trying to sort of justify it as?

• 29:44Speaker 00

  Or perhaps a deeper understanding of the forces of Mother Nature.

• 29:48Steven Bartlett?

  Maybe.

• 29:48Speaker 00

  Perhaps the way that human beings are operating in the world today should be included amongst the forces of nature. We are a geological force. And worse than that, we're a psychic force, which is full of anger and hatred and suspicion and mutual destruction. That's not going to be good for nature. That's going to be disturbing. We're an integrated system in my view, we're not separate. Human beings are part of all of this and what we do affects all of that. And that's what the ancient myths seem to testify to. So if I may finish on that, when I look at our civilisation today, I don't want to go off on a rant,

• 30:29Speaker 00

  but when I look at our civilisation today, I see a civilisation that ticks all the mythological boxes, every single one for the next lost civilisation. And I envisage a situation 10 or 15,000 years from now, when we will be a myth, a fantasy, that our ancestors actually could speak to one another on opposite sides of the planet, that our ancestors, they could fly to the moon, you know, they could go to the depths of the ocean. The archaeologists of that time would say, complete fantasy, just made up, never happened, but it did. We're that lost civilisation.

• 31:08Speaker 00

  And we don't need a comet, we don't need solar activity because of, we're so psychically messed up as a species. We'll probably end up doing it to ourselves.

• 31:19Speaker 00

  That's what nuclear weapons are about, mass species suicide.

• 31:26Speaker 00

  And the mental processes that drive that, very dangerous, very effective of the world we live in.

• 31:36Speaker 00

  Hatred is a psychic force and the way it's being generated around the world at the moment and mobilised and focused is, it's got to be bad for all of us.

• 31:48Steven Bartlett?

  Especially when we have such powers to self-destruct.

• 31:50Speaker 00

  It's terrible. This is what drives me nuts, is looking at the low consciousness level of the so-called leaders on this planet. When I look around the whole bunch of them, I just see very low consciousness individuals who define everything in material terms, who are focused on, this also gets me into trouble, but I,

• 32:17Speaker 00

  I think nationalism is something that humanity needs to grow out of. We need to grow out of nationalism, it's just an extension of tribalism. We need to grow out of it soon. And let me be clear, I am not talking about world government. I don't want anything like, I don't want any government, I'm an anarchist basically, that's what anarchy means, it means without government. I don't want any government at all. But we have to get past this notion that by accident, I was born with this particular skin, you know? The notion is that these accidents of birth define us, that we must somehow massively respect and love people who look like us and kind of hate and fear people who don't look like us.

• 33:00Speaker 00

  We have to get past that, we have to get past that as a species, it's really important. All human beings everywhere, all the same fundamentally. Of course, we're vastly diverse, we have incredible different gifts. I value and appreciate the differences in different cultures all around the world. This is wonderful, but it doesn't have to come with, and we are better than you. And we're going to kill you because you don't share our ideas. This is insane, it's crazy, we're not a mature species, we're a childish species. And leading our species are leaders who have the mentality of deranged teenagers.

• 33:38Steven Bartlett?

  We elected them.

• 33:39Speaker 00

  Yeah, we did, very unfortunately, which shows how easy it is to manipulate the narrative in the world today. Today, who wins in elections isn't the best person, isn't the good person, isn't the person who's going to do good. It's the best communicator who wins.

• 33:56Steven Bartlett?

  So this ancient civilisation that we could have theoretically forgotten, you are somewhat implying that maybe they were right, that their own actions caused the great flood, as they say, they talk about it in mythology.

• 34:09Speaker 00

  Well, I floated that notion, yeah, yeah, they might, they might have been. But it's enough to say that that's what they believed, because that's what all the myths say. The Noah story is prefigured in ancient Sumer with an almost identical flood myth. The gods are angry, a great flood is going to be sent. The intention is to wipe out humanity, but this god who's called Enki says to Atrehas, I'm going to save you. Build a boat, build it now, a big one, put into it the seeds of all things that you will need. Bring each animal of every kind into your boat. This is, this is a kind of survival arc, which is exactly the same as Noah. Noah's ark is just copied on that, it's just borrowed from that.

• 34:53Steven Bartlett?

  And to people that say, well, these are just stories, these are fictions that someone wrote and then they passed them down and there's no truth in these things at all?

• 34:59Speaker 00

  They're welcome to say that, I just happen to think they're not and my job has been to make that case. I do not claim that I have proved there was a lost civilisation. Any archaeologist who says Hancock claims he's proved that is lying. I don't claim that, I claim I'm puzzled and mystified and I'm going to, I'm going to complete that journey as long as I can. I'm going to carry on investigating and looking into all aspects of this, because that's what I'm here to do.

• 35:27Steven Bartlett?

  And that lost civilisation, you said they were seaboring potentially?

• 35:30Speaker 00

  Seafaring, yeah, yeah.

• 35:31Steven Bartlett?

  Which means they had boats?

• 35:32Speaker 00

  Yeah, yeah, so we know, for example, that anatomically modern human beings reached Australia 60,000 years ago. Those involved significant sea journeys. They reached Cyprus in the Mediterranean 14,000 years ago. Again, they involve sea journeys, not engine boats, not metal boats. You can do it on quite simple craft. Look at, look at the Polynesians, look at the vast distances that they explored on outrigger canoes. So yeah, boats, but not our kind of boats.

• 36:03Steven Bartlett?

  Hmm, I just don't understand how, if they're travelling the seas in boats, how they aren't classified as a civilisation?

• 36:10Speaker 00

  Well, because according to the mainstream model, which I am trying to provide an alternative to, they never existed. There was no such people, they never did these things, the maps are just coincidences, irrelevant, just odd. They put Antarctica, they put a landmass in Antarctica because they felt it would balance the world. That's the theory that's given. And it's just, to me, it's not satisfactory, it just doesn't add up. These things need to be explained. And it's why, it's why in every society which wishes to make progress, mavericks, people who go against the grain, no matter how much shit they have to take, are needed.

• 36:54Speaker 00

  They're needed in our society to provide a balance to this overwhelming mass that science now occupies. Science has now come to occupy the space that religion occupied in many people's minds. And again, I need to emphasise, I'm not against science, science is about to save my life. I have major heart surgery coming up in two weeks' time. I'm not against it at all, but I think it should be one weapon in our armoury, not the only weapon.

• 37:19Steven Bartlett?

  One of the things I was super curious about, because I was actually there last week, is this place.

• 37:26Speaker 00

  Giza.

• 37:26Steven Bartlett?

  Pyramids of Giza.

• 37:27Speaker 00

  The Great Pyramid of Giza. Here we look at it, attributed to the pharaoh Khufu, who was a pharaoh of the fourth dynasty.

• 37:39Steven Bartlett?

  What is the mystery here? So again, pyramids are this big stack of like concrete blocks in Egypt. What is the, why is it so mysterious?

• 37:47Speaker 00

  Well, first of all, they're not concrete, they're hewn limestone and granite.

• 37:53Speaker 00

  First of all, it's mysterious for the sheer size of it. Look, so you've got roughly 750 feet along each side, okay? And they vary in length by only fractions of an inch. They've got it just about spot on exact on the side length and you want that in a pyramid. Because if you get it wrong, you're going to end up with a corkscrew rather than a pyramid. If you get it wrong at the bottom, those errors are going to magnify and they're going to get worse and worse. And it's not going to be a pyramid at the end of the day. Secondly, weight calculated at about 6 million tonnes, more than 2 million individual blocks of stone. I've climbed the pyramid five times.

• 38:38Speaker 00

  Once I climbed it when there was an event taking place on the Giza Plateau, picnics basically. And a lot of Kyren's just decided to climb the pyramid. As I say, I've climbed it four other times without other people there, but this time, there were hundreds of people on the pyramid. That's when I realised how difficult this thing is to make, because the biggest danger was the other people. Once you're up two or three courses, you fall, you're dead. It's a 52 degree slope, there's no way you're going to stop. You're going to come down and still every year, people die on the Great Pyramid. That's why they've made it illegal to climb it now. So there's that. Then there's the almost perfect alignment of the Great Pyramid to true north.

• 39:20Speaker 00

  Not to compass north, which is about 10 or 11 degrees off true north, but to astronomical north, real north. The Great Pyramid is aligned within three sixtieths of a single degree. I put it that way because degrees are divided into 60 minutes, so three minutes of arc. The Great Pyramid is aligned to that level of precision, three sixtieths of a single degree to true north. And they've done that on a 6 million tonne monument, which is 481 feet high, if you take account of its original height, which has a 52 degree slope, which is filled with internal corridors and spaces, Grand Gallery, the ascending, the descending corridors. All of this is extremely difficult to do. It is, it's not impossible to do because we see it there.

• 40:04Speaker 00

  Could our civilisation do it? Yeah, I think we could. But would we do it? No, I don't think we would, the motive wouldn't be there. People say, what, why, I mean, why do you want to align it perfectly to true north? It's enough to ask me to build a 6 million tonne monument, but you want it aligned to true north as well? Come on, I mean, that's a really difficult specification. We find that hard. A kind of artistry was put to work on the Great Pyramid as well as skill. Let's get rid of any notion that slaves were involved. They were not, there wasn't slavery in the Old Kingdom anyway. But this is a work of love from the first to the last stone. It's a work done with great skill and care.

• 40:47Speaker 00

  It's a beautiful and extraordinary thing, both inside and out. It sits almost exactly on latitude 30, which is one third of the way between the North Pole and the equator. And it incorporates the dimensions of the earth on a scale of 1 to 43,200 in its own dimensions. So if you take the height of the Great Pyramid and multiply it by 43,200, I'll explain why that number matters. Multiply it by that number, you get the polar radius of the earth. Measure the base perimeter of the Great Pyramid, multiply it by the same factor, 43,200, you get the equatorial circumference of the earth.

• 41:29Speaker 00

  Archaeologists know this. They say it's a coincidence, total coincidence, just by chance. However, I could agree with them actually, if the scale was not 1 to 43,200. But the fact that it's 1 to 43,200 changes everything, because that belongs to a sequence of numbers that is found in ancient mythology all around the world. And those numbers are all multiples of the number 72. And I mentioned at the beginning of our discussion, the book by the great historian of science, Giorgio de Santillana, professor of the history of science at MIT. He was the first to identify that these numbers and the imagery that go with them

• 42:12Speaker 00

  derive from a phenomenon called the precession of the equinoxes. I'd better explain that a little bit. The precession of the equinoxes. Everybody's heard the song, "We live in the dawning of the age of Aquarius." I'm sure you've heard that.

• 42:27Steven Bartlett?

  No comment.

• 42:28Speaker 00

  "We live in the dawning of the age of Aquarius." That's astrology. At the moment, and for the last 2,000 years, on the spring equinox, the sun has risen against the background of the constellation of Pisces. That's the age of Pisces. We live in the age of Pisces. It's not an accident that the early Christians used the fish as their symbol. The next constellation on the zodiac, when you go backwards around it, is Aquarius. And the precession is actually caused by a wobble on the axis of the earth. I'm going to pretend that this is the earth.

• 43:04Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 43:04Speaker 00

  And instead of just doing this, while it's doing that, it's also doing that. It's wobbling. And that affects the rising time and season at which particular stars rise. It affects two things noticeably. One thing it affects is the pole star. At the moment, the pole star is Polaris. The pole star, this is astronomical north. It's the star towards which the extended north pole of the earth points most directly.

• 43:30Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 43:31Speaker 00

  At present, it's Polaris. It hasn't always been Polaris. 4,000 years ago, it was Tuban in the constellation of Draco. That's because the earth's axis is doing this. At the horizon, it does the same thing with the zodiacal constellations. We shift gradually through each constellation, lasts about 2,000 years in each constellation. The great year where we come back to square one is just under 26,000 years, 25,920 years, is the convention that's applied in ancient mythology. So the fact that one of those numbers is the scale used to encode the dimensions of the earth in the Great Pyramid cannot be accidental, in my view. It's a deliberate choice. If it was 1 to 57,000, I wouldn't pay attention to it. If it was 1 to 21,000, I wouldn't pay attention to it.

• 44:15Speaker 00

  But 1 to 43,200, that's the number of syllables in the Rig Veda, for example. You find this all over the world, everywhere.

• 44:23Steven Bartlett?

  So what does that imply or suggest?

• 44:26Speaker 00

  What it suggests is that incorporated into the building of the Great Pyramid was knowledge that was not supposed to have existed 4,500 years ago. In fact, knowledge that was not supposed to have existed until 2,000 years ago. Hipparchus of Alexandria is the Greek who was supposed to have discovered precession. But the incorporation of precession in the structure of the Great Pyramid says to me that that knowledge is much older. It was already old then.

• 44:53Steven Bartlett?

  I really want to make sure I'm clear on this precession thing, because I'm not super clear.

• 44:56Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 44:57Steven Bartlett?

  And what does it, what does it mean, precession? It means that there's a certain star pattern that we see once every 20,000 years?

• 45:04Speaker 00

  It, it, it, it precesses, it goes backwards.

• 45:06Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 45:07Speaker 00

  The direction through the, through the zodiac is, is forwards in the normal year. But in the long-term year, because of the wobble, the sun rises against the background of the spring equinox. The sun rises perfectly due east. It always does. It also rises perfectly due east on the autumn equinox. On the summer solstice, the sun rises in the northern hemisphere, north of east, and south of east on the, on the winter solstice. The key moment for the ancients was the equinox. It was considered to define the character of the year. And what defined it was the constellation that housed the sun, that was the house of the sun.

• 45:43Steven Bartlett?

  Okay, so the star pattern.

• 45:45Speaker 00

  Yeah. A zodiacal constellation. These, the constellations of the zodiac lie along what is called the ecliptic, the path of the sun.

• 45:54Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 45:55Speaker 00

  Okay, the earth, the moon, we're all on the ecliptic, within a few degrees above or below it. And, and therefore, these are constellations that we can see the sun against the background of. Constellation like Orion, you'll never see the sun against the background of it. You're only going to see it against the background of the zodiacal constellations that lie on the so-called path of the sun. And those are the 12 familiar constellations of the zodiac. And as I say, we're living in the age of Pisces right now. And according to ancient astrology, we're going to be making the transition into Aquarius within about the next 150 years. The sun will have left Pisces and will be rising in Aquarius. So actually, the song is true. We do live in the dawning of the age of Aquarius.

• 46:39Speaker 00

  The only question is whether that means anything or not. The ancients thought it did. We think it doesn't. I'm not sure who's right.

• 46:46Steven Bartlett?

  So I, I'm going to repeat this back to you to check if I've got it correctly, but I suspect I might not have. Within the design of the pyramids, there was a number, which you said was 43,200.

• 46:57Speaker 00

  It's a scale.

• 46:57Steven Bartlett?

  It's a scale.

• 46:58Speaker 00

  It's a scale that's used for the height and the base perimeter of the Great Pyramid. Base perimeter, measure four sides, add it together, height, the actual height of the Great Pyramid. It's true original height. It lost about 30 feet in an earthquake in 1301. But you can calculate the true original height from the angle of the, of the sides.

• 47:18Steven Bartlett?

  Ah, yeah, right.

• 47:20Speaker 00

  And when you take that height and multiply it by 43,200, you get the polar radius of the earth.

• 47:29Steven Bartlett?

  You get the radius of the earth.

• 47:30Speaker 00

  That's from the center of the earth to the edge of the earth. It's not the diameter of the earth. The diameter is twice the radius. It's the, it's the polar radius.

• 47:39Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 47:39Speaker 00

  A key dimension of the earth. Measure the sides and you get, on the same scale, 1 to 43,200, you get the equatorial circumference of the earth, what the earth measures at its equator, its largest, its largest measure. And, and that is either a coincidence or it's deliberate. And because of the number chosen, and because that number is all over ancient mythology, I think it's deliberate.

• 48:06Steven Bartlett?

  That means that they must have known the circumference of the earth?

• 48:09Speaker 00

  Yeah. It means that they knew the circumference of the earth and it means they chose a place to put the Great Pyramid, which also was relevant. This isn't latitude 23 or latitude 37. This is just a fraction off latitude 30 degrees north. So therefore, one third of the way between the equator and the north pole. It's a, it's a, it's a significant relevance. What it's telling us is, this monument speaks to the earth. This monument is locked into the true north of this planet. This monument gives you the dimensions of this planet. This monument is speaking to this planet.

• 48:46Steven Bartlett?

  How could they possibly know the circumference of the earth 4,500 years ago?

• 48:50Speaker 00

  Because they're a lost civilization. Because the, the knowledge comes down from a former time. I don't think the Egyptians knew it. I think it came down, I think it was inherited knowledge from what I'm here to advocate for and to speak for, the possibility of a major forgotten episode in the human story.

• 49:09Steven Bartlett?

  Which could be 20,000 years ago.

• 49:10Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 49:11Steven Bartlett?

  And they've passed it down in, in myths and stories?

• 49:15Speaker 00

  Yes, passed it down, but not only in myths and stories. This is something else that I will, I'll just hint at here, that I intend to get into in the new book, is that there appear to have been organizations in each of these civilizations. In Egypt, they were called the followers of Horus. In Sumer, they were called the Apkalu. They served as advisors to kings. They were called sages. There's a reference to them. Many cultures refer to them as the seven sages. They provided advice to kings in the historical period. And I'm wondering whether we're looking at some kind of long-lived organization here, which is carrying down information,

• 50:00Speaker 00

  looking for the right time to switch the engine of civilization back on again. I know it's, sounds extreme, but that's what I do. I explore, I explore extreme ideas and see whether, and see whether they fit or not. And I'm beginning to find this idea does fit. It, it fits with a whole range of information, which will be in the next book.

• 50:21Steven Bartlett?

  A sage that reports to the king and...

• 50:24Speaker 00

  Not only reports to the king, that advises the king.

• 50:26Steven Bartlett?

  On what?

• 50:27Speaker 00

  On everything, on what to do.

• 50:29Steven Bartlett?

  Oh, okay.

• 50:30Speaker 00

  Yeah. The Apkalu, in the ancient traditions of Sumer, they existed in the pre-Diluvian world. They were there in the world before the flood. Then they're, and, and they taught mankind knowledge then. But the flood came, the cataclysm came, they were wiped out. But some of the Apkalu survived and they appear after the flood as advisors to the earliest historical kings of Sumer. And I'm just wondering whether, you know, there are, there are religions in the world which have maintained traditions and maintained offices, priesthoods, for example, for thousands of years. I don't see why the same shouldn't be true here, why there shouldn't have been some

• 51:13Speaker 00

  driving motive at the end of the Ice Age to preserve in a way what they knew and to find mechanisms to pass it down. One mechanism is to embed it in wonderful stories that will go on being told. And another mechanism is to set up some kind of secret society, which is operating behind the scenes to guide and steer society. I'm not going to present the evidence for that here, but it's an avenue I'm pursuing. If I, if I don't find it a satisfactory avenue, I'll abandon it. But at the moment, it's looking very interesting.

• 51:42Steven Bartlett?

  Then where did all this information go? You know, because if the people who built the pyramids of Giza had this information, where did the sages go and with their information?

• 51:51Speaker 00

  Yeah, it's very, it's very odd, actually. What, what happens after Giza is fascinating. Because once you, once you leave the fourth dynasty period, get into the fifth and sixth dynasties, pyramid building collapses. The stuff they're making in the fifth dynasty, like the Pyramid of Unas, fifth dynasty pyramid in Saqqara. Inside, it's stunningly beautiful, beautiful tomb chamber, stars on the ceiling, incredible hieroglyphs on the side, it's magical. But outside, it's just a pile of dust. It's a mess. It doesn't even, you could hardly recognize it as a pyramid. And it's true of all those. So this is odd in itself.

• 52:35Speaker 00

  Normally, when human cultures create something, they continue to work on it and it tends to get better and better, not worse and worse. So it's odd what happens to the pyramids, that they get worse and worse in Egypt. It's like, job done, done that, move on. And that's there. And that's going to speak to human beings, not just for a generation, not just for 100 years. It's going to be there speaking to us for thousands of years. It's going to be sitting there on the Giza Plateau like an enormous question mark, calling towards it, those who don't see it just as a heap of stones, but actually see it as something wonderful and magnificent and mysterious, calling them to it and saying, "Learn about me, figure me out.

• 53:17Speaker 00

  And in the process of learning about me, you're going to learn so much else." Well, in learning about the Great Pyramid, I find that it is encoded with astronomical information that should not be there if the current model of the history of science is correct. I think the current model of the history of science is wrong. I think this information was known much earlier and it's encoded in the Great Pyramid. Once I know that, then I have to start thinking, what else does that mean? And what else it means to me is a big forgotten episode in our story.

• 53:48Steven Bartlett?

  Again, why? Because they had intelligence that they're not credited with having at that time?

• 53:53Speaker 00

  Yes, because it's there, because there should not be a monument of this scale which incorporates into it information that was not supposed to be available to human beings for another 2,500 years.

• 54:06Steven Bartlett?

  So they must have got it from somewhere?

• 54:08Speaker 00

  Yes, they must have got it from somewhere. And, and the fact that it's there is, is just a fact. And all that's left for us to say is, either it's a coincidence, complete coincidence, or it's the result of a deliberate decision. And if it's the result of a deliberate decision, that weighs much more towards a deliberate decision because of the scale chosen, because the scale is part of a system that is found all over the ancient world. It's not a random number. It's a very specific number. And it's a number that is derived from a motion of the earth itself, from the precession of the earth's axis. It is derived from that. So I'm situated at a significant latitude, I'm oriented to true north,

• 54:53Speaker 00

  and I incorporate the measurements of your planet on a scale derived from your planet itself. That's what the Great Pyramid is saying to us. And it's saying, "Figure that out."

• 55:03Steven Bartlett?

  Do you think there's something underneath it?

• 55:05Speaker 00

  Oh, there's definitely something underneath it.

• 55:07Steven Bartlett?

  Because we think of it as a sort of like building with the, with tunnels inside it, but...

• 55:11Speaker 00

  Yeah, when you go into the Great Pyramid now, you go in through what is, what is called the Robert's Tunnel or Mamoun's Hole. The Khalifa Mamoun had a notion that there would be an entrance to the Great Pyramid in its northern face. Other pyramids had been found with entrances in their northern face. But at that time, the Great Pyramid was completely covered with perfectly smooth limestone facing stones and nobody could see the entrance. They came off later in that earthquake in 1301. But when he broke in, in the ninth century, they didn't know where the door was. Apparently, there was a place you could almost literally press a switch and open that door, but they couldn't find it. So they broke in with sledgehammers and chisels and they smashed their way into the Great Pyramid.

• 55:55Speaker 00

  And then, at a certain moment, when they're about 60 or 70 feet into the Great Pyramid, they hear something dropping in a hollow space. A big something has fallen in a hollow space. They head towards that sound. And then they enter the original corridor system of the Great Pyramid. And that's the way we all go in now. We go in through that Robert's Tunnel and then we go up the Grand Gallery. But we can also go down. We can go down to the subterranean chamber, which is 100 feet vertically beneath the base of the Great Pyramid, deep in the bedrock. I actually think that was the original sacred site on that monument, is that subterranean chamber. I don't advise anybody with claustrophobia to go down there. You're very conscious that you've got a 6 million ton monument

• 56:40Speaker 00

  sitting right above you in a place that has earthquakes. It can be quite oppressive. But that's just a hint of what's under the Giza Plateau. That's just, that's an accessible bit. But it's, it's, it's already obvious that there, that there is so much more. Some of it's been picked up with ground penetrating radar. And I'll take this opportunity to say that the hysterical reaction of mainstream scientists to the announcement by Filippo Biondi.

• 57:09Steven Bartlett?

  What is he saying?

• 57:09Speaker 00

  He's saying that there are enormous structures under the second pyramid, not the Great Pyramid, under the pyramid attributed to Cafre, Kufu's successor. The, the structures that go hundreds of feet deep under there, structures that involve spiral kind of stairways. The reaction has been overwhelmingly dismissing this. Archaeologists have not, they won't look further. They say it's impossible and they won't look at it. And I think that's shameful for people who imagine they're scientists. They should be looking further. I'd like to see the technology trialed in Turkey. There are underground cities in Turkey, Khimakli, for example. We know every room in those underground cities. Run this technology on them. If they accurately reproduce what we already know is there,

• 57:54Speaker 00

  then we can be pretty sure they're accurately reproducing what's under the Giza pyramids. We need to do a lot more work before dismissing this. So I'm, I remain open to the notion that a huge underworld awaits discovery under Giza. And the ancient Egyptians themselves felt that way. They felt the Giza, the ancient name for it was Rostow. It was an entrance to the underworld. They saw it as an entrance to the afterlife realm. It makes sense that there would be much, much underground structures there.

• 58:21Steven Bartlett?

  And you've been alone in the pyramids?

• 58:22Speaker 00

  Being with large groups in the pyramid is difficult in the sense that the pyramid, to me, feels like a personality. When I'm in there with a large group, I, I feel the pyramid withdrawing. It, it's like it doesn't want to speak to you anymore. It, the place becomes a dead space. But, but if you can be in there with a very small group or be there alone and just be still, let the silence descend, sit in that silence, in the very low lighting that's in there. Just pause and remind yourself that you're in the last surviving wonder of the ancient world. And it's an incredible privilege to be there. And just let it speak to you. And it does.

• 59:07Speaker 00

  This is, of course, my critics will say, another proof that Hancock's a lunatic. But I'm just telling you what, what, what, what happens to me. It's a, I, I think it's a monument that communicates.

• 59:18Steven Bartlett?

  What did it say to you?

• 59:20Speaker 00

  It said to me, "Go further." Very much so. I, I, I feel, in a weird way, validated by the Great Pyramid. I think it's, not only me, others as well, who've devoted big chunks of their lives to the Great Pyramid, like Robert Bovall, who is a great man, by the way. The Orion Correlation, the recognition that the three pyramids on the ground are laid out in the pattern of the belt stars of the constellation of Orion, makes radical and important changes to our understanding of ancient Egypt. Again, that's another thing that's been leapt upon by the archaeological mafia, because they want to destroy every new idea, rather than spend a bit of time thinking about it.

• 1:00:05Steven Bartlett?

  You guys know that I only drink one type of coffee these days and it's called Comitier. If you don't know the brand, they flash freeze coffee at the perfect moment to lock in all of the amazing flavour. They've done something incredible. They've gone all around the world and they found the most delicious coffees from all of these places and they've created a world mug competition box that you can buy. So if you want to try coffee from Honduras or Panama or England or the USA or Italy or France, you can then order that particular coffee on subscription to come to your house. No machines necessary. Not only are they our sponsor and a company I have invested in, it is the only coffee I drink now. Actually, this morning when I came to work, I put Comitier on these webinars, which is another one of

• 1:00:48Steven Bartlett?

  my favourites from France. So if you want to try your own Comitier, they've reserved a certain amount for Dior or Ceeo listeners. Just go to cometeer.com/DOAC and you can get $20 off if you use the code DOAC at checkout. You know the little traditional SIM card that goes inside of our phones? They haven't changed at all since they were invented in the 90s. You have this physical piece of plastic that means you're locked into one carrier, one network, and the second you cross a border, that carrier can start charging you whatever they want. But there are alternatives and today's sponsor, Salee, is one of them. It's an eSIM app that gives you a safe and

• 1:01:28Steven Bartlett?

  secure data connection in over 200 destinations. All of their eSIMs have built-in cybersecurity, which is great if you're travelling for work and looking at confidential material. I've been using Salee whenever I travel because the connection is always reliable and it saves me a tonne of roaming fees. It also means I don't have to deal with all of the faff that surrounds sorting out a SIM everywhere I go. If you want to give it a try, download the Salee app from the App Store now and scan the QR code on screen. And if you want 15% off your first purchase, use my code DOAC when you get to checkout. That's DOAC for 15% off. Keep that to yourself.

• 1:02:07Steven Bartlett?

  If what you're saying is true around the, you know, the first civilizations being 20 plus thousand years ago, what does that mean for us, for our lives?

• 1:02:18Speaker 00

  Oh, it's really important meaning for us because, because it will finally remind us and tell us once and for all that we're not what it's all about. It's not all about us. The whole human story is not about us. It's not inevitable that it comes to this and that we are temporary, like every other civilization. We're so filled with arrogance and pride right now and our technological achievements, our great abilities, our great powers. And the arrogance that comes with that, the Greeks used to call that hubris. It's ultimately ends in nemesis, ultimately brings you down. Arrogance, arrogance is not a good thing. It's not a good thing in an individual and it's a terrible thing in a civilization.

• 1:03:03Steven Bartlett?

  It also means that a lot of the things that we've dismissed as, you know, conspiracy or, you know, hocus pocus, whatever, might not be. I mean, you talk a lot about like astrology and stuff like that.

• 1:03:14Speaker 00

  Yeah, I think we should keep open to, to systems that the ancients used, which we've dismissed, which might be very astrology is one of them. What does astrology ultimately say? It ultimately says that we, these beings, these humans, aren't isolated, but are connected to the universe and are affected by everything that happens in the universe. And it's, and it's recognizing that there may be patterns in that. And instead of, instead of just rubbishing that or doing a few investigations, I think it may be worth looking further into that. Worth looking further into telepathy too. My friend Rupert Sheldrake, a serious

• 1:03:52Speaker 00

  scientist, one of the very few who's doing serious scientific work on issues like telepathy and like telekinosis, being able to move things with your mind. Mainstream scientists, most of them will just laugh at that. Absolute rubbish. Yeah, go away. You're a lunatic. But why are we lunatics to look into those things? It's really interesting and it's really worth investigating. We should realise that we have a heritage of hundreds of thousands of years, and I believe it's even older than 315,000 years. We do not have a heritage of 100 years, which is the heritage of modern science. Well, let's, let's be generous. Let's put modern

• 1:04:32Speaker 00

  science even back to the Greeks in a way, but it doesn't become what we would recognise as science until the 19th century, really. So it's a very young thing. If you take the human being as the, as the heart of this and, and you were to find a little pimple on the nose of that human being, that would be science. It's a pimple on the nose of hundreds of thousands of years of human experience. Why should we be so arrogant to dismiss those hundreds of thousands of years of human experience in the favour of 150 years maximum of so-called science?

• 1:05:09Steven Bartlett?

  I mean, one of the interesting things is I actually did go to the Amazon rainforest in Peru. And they've discovered these like big square things underground.

• 1:05:18Speaker 00

  I've been involved in that.

• 1:05:19Steven Bartlett?

  What is, what is that?

• 1:05:20Speaker 00

  Well, the, the name that's been given to them is, is geoglyphs.

• 1:05:25Steven Bartlett?

  Geoglyphs.

• 1:05:26Speaker 00

  I think I know this one. Nobody knew they existed at all until about 40 years ago.

• 1:05:32Steven Bartlett?

  Really?

• 1:05:33Speaker 00

  And because the Amazon rainforest is a rainforest and densely covered with canopy. However, it's constantly being settled. This is a problem in itself. It's constantly being settled. The Amazon is being cleared and it's being turned into farms. It's the clearance of bits of the Amazon initially that exposed these huge geometric structures under the rainforest, no longer under because they cleared the rainforest. Now with LiDAR, I've been involved with Marty Parsonen. In fact, he was on my Netflix show. He's an archaeologist from Finland and, and with Alteo Ranzi, a Brazilian geographer. What they're doing is a dense LiDAR survey of the whole of Acre province in Brazil. This

• 1:06:18Speaker 00

  is in Acre province as well. The areas that are still under canopy rainforest and LiDAR can see through the canopy and it can see raised objects underneath and it can actually give you the shape of that object. Then they can go in low, you know, low impact, just a few of them go in, check it out, see what's there and then begin the archaeology on the site.

• 1:06:39Steven Bartlett?

  I mean, this is a prime example. I've got, I've got a list here of things that we used to believe and things that, how those beliefs have changed. And one of them was that we used to believe that the Amazon was an untouched wilderness.

• 1:06:49Speaker 00

  That's right.

• 1:06:50Steven Bartlett?

  But in the 1970s, we discovered, what, a thousand of these structures?

• 1:06:53Speaker 00

  At least. They're, they're confident now from the LiDAR work that they're talking of thousands, three, five, 6,000. There are also roadways that run for 100 kilometres plus. There's absolutely no doubt that the Amazon once supported a population of millions with extraordinary clever management of rainforest soils by creating a man-made soil that they call terra preta. It's still used in Brazil today. We are having to completely reconceive the Amazon. It was thought of as a pristine rainforest, which a few human

• 1:07:30Speaker 00

  beings wandered around aimlessly and hunting, whatever. Now we know that it was the homeland of a very large population who lived in city-sized communities, who joined those communities with long, straight roadways. It's, it's as though the veil is being pulled back and we're beginning to see a completely untold story in the Amazon. And these geoglyphs, very precise rectangles, triangles, circles, squares, all of these, it's geometry, it's geometry. What, what's, what's it doing there in the Amazon? And, and when I, when I talked

• 1:08:10Speaker 00

  to a local shaman about this, and I did on, on camera in the, in the Netflix show, he talked to me about how important these places still are to him, that these places were made by their ancestors, that they're places for shamanic gatherings, places for shamans to use specifically to contact the world beyond. Let's be clear about this. All civilizations, including ours, although we may deny it, all of them emerged from shamanism. Shamanism is the essence of the human adventure and, and all civilizations emerged from shamanism. And this one was no-

• 1:08:46Steven Bartlett?

  Shamanism.

• 1:08:46Speaker 00

  Shamanism, yes. Shamanism being the system of using altered states of consciousness to gain direct access to other levels of reality.

• 1:08:56Steven Bartlett?

  Psychedelics.

• 1:08:57Speaker 00

  Yeah, psychedelics or you can fast for a month. That will give you some visions too. There, there are, there are other ways, but, but psychedelics are the most efficient way to enter the altered state of consciousness. And shamans are masters of the use of plant medicines everywhere in the world, but particularly in the Amazon rainforest. This is, this is where you, you see it most strongly. And DMT, the active ingredient of ayahuasca, is very fast acting in the way that it's normally consumed. Okay. It's normally vaped or smoked. It produces a 10-minute journey, literally to the other side of reality. And there's not much you can do about it once you're in there. But then you're out again. Ayahuasca

• 1:09:42Speaker 00

  is a very clever technology. The ayahuasca brew contains DMT. DMT is not orally active. So you can drink a tea made of, with loads of DMT in it and it's not going to do anything to you because there's an enzyme in the gut that destroys it. The ayahuasca vine contains a chemical that shuts that enzyme down and allows the DMT to be absorbed orally, producing an experience that can last for hours, that can be physically very uncomfortable. What they're doing at Imperial College is they're giving them DMT by intravenous infusion, using basically anaesthesia technology to constantly top up the dose to keep the individual

• 1:10:25Speaker 00

  in the peak state. And unlike other psychedelics, there's no tolerance with DMT. So you can keep on dosing people.

• 1:10:32Steven Bartlett?

  When you, you've taken ayahuasca 80 times?

• 1:10:34Speaker 00

  Something like that, something like that. It's not just, it's important to be clear about a number of things. First of all, all psychedelics are extremely serious matters. They are not to be taken trivially. They are extremely serious. With experienced use of ayahuasca, one of the very common reports is this moral dimension, that you are presented with your own life, with what you've done with your own life, with the pain that you may have caused to others. And suddenly, that pain that you caused to another person, which you dismissed as they just deserved that, they just deserved those words. You suddenly get it from their point of view. You feel the agony that your words caused

• 1:11:19Speaker 00

  that person. And you, and you find yourself, did I do that? Did I say that? You suddenly see what you are. You can't go back into your own past and change negative and useless and pointless things that you did. You can't do that. But you can avoid repeating them in the future. And it's that teaching of a moral lesson that I find most valuable in ayahuasca. It's helped me to come to terms with my tendency to swift anger. I'm, I'm very aware that that's a problem I have and it's something I need to do something about. And ayahuasca has helped me with that. I've, I've become gentler and softer, not gentle enough maybe. It's a journey. It's not a, it's not an overnight transformation,

• 1:12:03Speaker 00

  not a magic pill. The main work with ayahuasca comes after the medicine. The main work comes with what you do with the experience, how you integrate it into your life. That's where the work begins. People say it's so easy to take a, a brew. Well, it's actually not that easy because you're going to vomit and have diarrhoea, but, but easy. But that's where the work begins, not where it ends.

• 1:12:26Steven Bartlett?

  And that emotion, is that, does that stem back to your relationship with your parents? Because I was reading about your early, your early-

• 1:12:32Speaker 00

  Yeah. Look, we're all frail human beings. We're all messed about in lots of ways. We all have, we all have issues in our lives.

• 1:12:40Steven Bartlett?

  You said regret.

• 1:12:41Speaker 00

  Regret. Yes, I, I do regret saying hurtful and unkind things to a number of people over the years. I do, I do regret that very much. I do regret very much that I wasn't, I wasn't mature enough to realise why my parents were so difficult, that I never really forgave them for that. I never really forgave them for the strangeness of my childhood and, and the various things that, that, that happened. I never really saw it from their point of view. My mother lost three children aside from me. I'm an only child, but her first child was carried to term before me and born dead. Then I was born, I lived, and then the next two both died at the age of a year. Well, I know now, as a father,

• 1:13:26Speaker 00

  I know, I know what, what, what a catastrophe that is for a person, for, for a mother to, to lose three children like that.

• 1:13:34Steven Bartlett?

  You said weird childhood.

• 1:13:36Speaker 00

  Yeah. So this is me, this is little Graham here with my mother and my father. I was, it was 1954 that we landed in India. My father was a surgeon, consultant surgeon. And so he went as a missionary surgeon to India, to a place called the Christian Medical College in Velor in South India. And we lived in a tin hut. But he was following his faith. He was doing what was, what was right for him. He was giving his skills to help, to help people. I, I realise that now and a lot of resentment I have towards him, I probably, you know, shouldn't have. He was an odd guy. He was very eccentric. He used to take me

• 1:14:16Speaker 00

  in to watch dissections. There, there were still hangings in India at that time and he would dissect the prisoners after the hangings. He had me in there watching it. He took me later on-

• 1:14:27Steven Bartlett?

  What age?

• 1:14:30Speaker 00

  Five.

• 1:14:31Steven Bartlett?

  You were watching bodies being cut up at five?

• 1:14:32Speaker 00

  Yeah, I was, yeah, absolutely. Very strange. See, it was presented to me, it's completely normal. But, but it was, it was strange. Fundamentally, he was a good man, I believe.

• 1:14:43Steven Bartlett?

  But I think allowing a four to five-year-old child be, to see those things is deeply traumatic in a way that you probably don't recognise until later.

• 1:14:54Speaker 00

  I, I agree. It's, it's come home to me more and more as the years have gone by, that what happened to me in those years in India scarred me deeply. It wasn't just the operating theatres and the dissections, the dissections. It was the gloom and the misery and the despair that settled over my family at that time. And I don't think I ever really recovered from that.

• 1:15:19Steven Bartlett?

  Did you have nightmares?

• 1:15:20Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:15:21Steven Bartlett?

  And what, what were those nightmares?

• 1:15:25Speaker 00

  Usually nightmares of loss, usually nightmares of suddenly I'm alone. I'm in a, I'm in a completely isolated, lost, alone.

• 1:15:37Steven Bartlett?

  The reason I ask these questions is there's only ever been one other guest who I sat here with a couple of years ago, who I believe his dad was a surgeon. And his dad brought him in to watch operations and dissections when he was young.

• 1:15:53Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:15:54Steven Bartlett?

  And it scarred him in a way that he didn't realise until later.

• 1:15:58Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:15:59Steven Bartlett?

  And he told me about the nightmares of waking up in the night and seeing those bodies of those people around his bed on a predictable basis and told me, he, he's actually the guy that coached Michael Jordan and then Kobe, before Kobe Bryant passed away. And he told me still as an adult, those bodies join him at night time. So he'll wake up at night time and he'll see them around, around his bed. So-

• 1:16:23Speaker 00

  Well, thank you, universe. That didn't happen to me. I, I, I do not have, I don't remember having gruesome nightmares. I remember a feeling of loneliness and abandonment. That's what I remember.

• 1:16:35Steven Bartlett?

  Loneliness and abandonment.

• 1:16:37Speaker 00

  Mm-hmm. I've always felt that way. I was always an outsider at school. Everywhere I've been all my life, that's what I'm for. I'm here to be an outsider. I've come to that conclusion. And, and I need to do that well. I need to provide an alternative point of view on the past.

• 1:16:56Steven Bartlett?

  There's a real cost to being an outsider.

• 1:16:58Speaker 00

  Oh, yeah. But there are also some benefits. You know, we are what we are. And, and for me, I was always strange. I had this childhood in, in, in India. I didn't fit into the British school system. I was a total failure at school. I could not connect. I could not connect with any of it. It seemed, I just didn't get it. What was this about? And, and the cruelty, the viciousness. My dad went to a boarding school and had a good experience. So he sent me to a boarding school in Durham in the north of England. It was the cruelest place. Beatings going on. I, I was repeatedly beaten about the bare buttocks by a sadistic headmaster with a cane. I couldn't fit in with the other kids at school and I don't

• 1:17:41Speaker 00

  feel victimised for being an outsider. I feel, I feel it's a privilege. I feel I've been given, I've been given an opportunity to take a different view of things as a result of being an outsider.

• 1:17:52Steven Bartlett?

  Are there words unsaid here with these two people in your life?

• 1:17:55Speaker 00

  Yes, there are, there are so many words unsaid. I'd like to go back to my mum and say, you know, I understand why you were so obsessed with keeping me alive and making sure that I did something with my life. And I'd like to say to my dad, look, you, you were pretty crazy, but you, you did at least inspire me to be eccentric. It's a funny thing, getting older. I'm 75, 76 in August. One of the things it does is it, you realise how collapsed life actually is. I remember being a teenager. I remember being a young man and, and I remember being middle-aged. And the feeling is, you're immortal. It's going to go on forever. Everything's going to go on forever. And it's long, it's long,

• 1:18:35Speaker 00

  lots of time to do the things you want to do. I have a message. No, it's not long. There is not lots of time. If there's things you want to do with your life, start now. Start right away. Don't wait. Otherwise, you'll not have the opportunity. Life is very short. It's a beautiful, beautiful gift that the universe has given to us. We are responsible for returning that gift by as far as possible, within the circumstances that the universe has given us, living a full life and contributing something worthwhile to that life. Not being a robot, not being commanded what to do, not, we, we need to learn to think for ourselves.

• 1:19:14Speaker 00

  This is something that is so easily forgotten. It's a miracle that you and I are sitting here at all. I'm here, that you're here, that we're here together. It's an absolute miracle. It's the result of billions and billions of years of processes in the universe, which had nothing to do with us, randomly bring us together at this, at this point. It's, it's really quite a miraculous situation. To be alive, to be born at all is a miracle. I think it was Voltaire, who, talking about reincarnation, who said, it's no more extraordinary to be born twice than to be born once. And I think there's a point in that.

• 1:19:51Steven Bartlett?

  Are you religious? Do you believe in a god or?

• 1:19:53Speaker 00

  I would say that I am, that I pay attention, close attention to what I would regard as the spiritual, non-physical side of life. But I do not belong to any organised religion. One of the things I don't like about organised religion is that your relationship to the divine, whatever you call the divine spirit world, whatever you want to call it, your relationship is mediated in some way. Some priest or rabbi or mullah teaches you how to mediate that relationship. And I, I think what's important in, for me anyway, in, in the spiritual inquiry is a direct relationship, a direct experience. Rather than being taught something, I want to experience it for myself. And that's why I found ayahuasca very, very

• 1:20:36Speaker 00

  valuable, because it has enabled me to experience something that is absolutely impossible to experience in normal, everyday life. We're so plugged in, we're so plugged in to the physical world and we have to be. We've got to be. We've got to obey the laws of physics. We've got to deal with the economics of our circumstances. You know, we have to make our way through life. All of those things we've got to do. But-

• 1:21:01Speaker 00

  If they become our total focus, we become shut off from everything and anything else that may exist. And what the big psychedelics can do, if they're taken in the right circumstances, with the right advice, with sincere intention, what they can do is get you out of your own way and allow you to connect to that wider realm that normally you cannot connect to. And yes, I do believe that a wider realm exists. Just in the same way that, you know, before the invention of the microscope, we had no idea that there were bacteria. I think I'm right about that. We started seeing these tiny little things swimming around. Gosh, major discovery. Well, they were always there. We just didn't have the kit to see them.

• 1:21:43Speaker 00

  And I'm suggesting that what psychedelics can be, and certainly what they use as shamans by for, is technology, a device for getting you out of your own way and allowing you to connect with other levels of reality that in daily life it doesn't serve you to be connected with.

• 1:22:01Steven Bartlett?

  The interesting thing about DMT in particular is when you speak to people who have done DMT, you know, I spent about a year working in a quite a big psychedelics company. Just to, I got really fascinated. I'd left my company. I didn't have anything to do with my time. So I started this podcast and I also, on YouTube, and I also started working in a psychedelics business because I found the studies on mental health and psychedelics really interesting. So I have quite a deep understanding, I guess, higher than average of Ibergaine and ayahuasca and DMT. And my partner is very, very spiritual and has done all these things as well. So one of the fascinating things is how similar people's experiences are on something like DMT. The funnily enough, your description of these creatures saying,

• 1:22:43Steven Bartlett?

  you're, you belong to us now, is almost verbatim. What one of my friends described two weeks ago, that they were teleported into this like 4K realm, where these creatures that are like slightly animal in that anatomical structure, maybe slightly a little bit human as well, basically was like had, had taken hold of him. And they were very curious and inspecting him, very colorful realm. And then they kind of sent him back, or at least, you know, after the, and it does make one wonder. I think one of my conclusions was if, if inhaling a small chemical can completely take me to another place, then, and if you, from a reasoning

• 1:23:23Steven Bartlett?

  perspective, it's just a, it was an inhale of a chemical, then it goes to say that my current perception of reality is just, is as fragile as an inhale of a chemical. Like me thinking that I'm here with you now is as fragile as inhaling one chemical. So to think that this is base reality, when the difference between this and being with some grasshopper people in 4K is literally an inhale. It just, for me, I was like, oh, wow. Okay.

• 1:23:56Speaker 00

  It's an extraordinary realization when that comes in. It causes us to question the nature of reality itself. And this is, this is what's really important about these medicines. First and foremost, you're right. These psychedelic medicines are proving incredibly effective as therapeutic tools. And that's great. I really think that's incredibly valuable. But there's another level to go, which is the inquiry into the nature of reality and the inquiry into what consciousness is. These medicines are very effective means to conduct that inquiry. And that's why I applaud what they're doing at Imperial College in London. They're also going to be doing trials at the University of California, San Diego. They're

• 1:24:41Speaker 00

  going to be doing trials in Costa Rica. A whole range of places now are looking into this because it's really interesting. People coming back and reporting the same experience when they haven't compared notes yet. How do we explain that? Because it's in a vision, and people say that at the moment, the default mode is to dismiss it and say, that's just rubbish. Don't waste time on it. Our preconceptions about the nature of reality should not limit our inquiry into the nature of reality. And at the moment, still unfortunately, there are preconceptions about the nature of reality, which is that it's material based, that there's nothing else to it really. Everything is reduced to matter. Even consciousness is reduced

• 1:25:24Speaker 00

  to matter. It's reduced to the physical matter of the brain. We don't know that for sure. We don't know what's going on. Consciousness is absolutely not understood. And so when we have mysteries, like people who are injected a small dose of a chemical like DMT and go off into a completely other reality, that's really interesting. And it's, it's, it's at least as interesting, if not more interesting than exploring other planets right now. I think we need to, I think we need to explore ourselves first. We need to, we're not in shape as a species to start exploring the universe. We don't want to export our toxicity to other parts of the universe until we've overcome it, until we've grown up as a species,

• 1:26:07Speaker 00

  which we haven't done yet. We need to know ourselves. Psychedelics are one way to do that. Not used irresponsibly, but used responsibly in a structured, careful, thoughtful way. They can be very helpful in knowing ourselves. That's the journey we need to do first. Go to Mars by all means, you know, go to the moon, we go even further, but do this first. Know who you are first, before you start doing those bigger and wider investigations. Get all that sorted out because we hardly sorted out anything on this planet. And we're talking about exploring other planets. Well, I'm all in favor of exploring other planets, but I'd like to sort out things on this planet first. That's where the resources should

• 1:26:48Speaker 00

  be going. And we should stop kidding ourselves that we can just escape this planet and make a complete shithole of it, leave it and go and live somewhere else. No, we can fix this. We are capable of fixing this. We're capable of fixing everything. Human beings have enormous potential. We're just using a fraction of 1% of it at the moment.

• 1:27:09Steven Bartlett?

  The question, I, you know, I mean, the obvious question that comes to mind is how? I was seeing, you know, maybe, I don't know, maybe some kind of leader comes along.

• 1:27:17Speaker 00

  Could be. I think we need to, need to move past leaders.

• 1:27:22Steven Bartlett?

  I just don't know how else humans would change without some kind of leadership.

• 1:27:25Speaker 00

  It's very difficult to see. I agree with you. It's very, it's very difficult to see how it happens. One person at a time, slowly, through, through word of mouth, through experience. But look, everything in the ayahuasca garden is not all flowers either. There's a lot of very wrong behavior going on there. People are exploiting that medicine. Basically, drug dealers are exploiting that medicine and offering it irresponsibly to people in groups of 100 or even more. That, that's, that's actually really, really stupid to do that. Ayahuasca is an intimate experience and it needs to be done in a very small group, not a very large group. So it's not, it's not all roses. I'm not, you know, I'm not trying to paint

• 1:28:06Speaker 00

  these medicines in a, in a false light. They have their downsides. They have their problems. They are extremely serious. We should always research and investigate before any experience with psychedelics, but they have a part to play. And it's an important part. And thank God, we're seeing its effects, psilocybin effect on long-term depression, very important. Post-traumatic stress disorder, very important. These therapeutic breakthroughs, hopefully, will open the door to further inquiries into the kind of work that's being done at Imperial College. What does this really tell us about the mystery of consciousness? What does this really tell us about what we think is real?

• 1:28:47Steven Bartlett?

  If you're thinking about starting a business, one of the first decisions you'll have to make is actually one of the most important, which is where do you build that business? Our product team, who manages everything we do, from our conversation cards to our diaries, has always used our sponsor Shopify. There are a few reasons for this, but one of the big ones is that when you're running a business, you really need your own store and your own customer data. And Shopify gives you exactly that. You aren't renting space from someone else's platform, hoping the rules don't suddenly change. And you avoid the classic founder challenges that inevitably come, like sorting out payments and logistics and storefronts, because it's already built into Shopify. Those early days are messy enough without the infrastructure challenge to create extra problems for you. And Shopify's

• 1:29:30Steven Bartlett?

  distribution piece is underrated too, because your products automatically get in front of people on Google, TikTok, YouTube, ChatGPT, which again, isn't something you have to figure out yourself. It's just already built into their platform. If you are serious about starting your own thing, start your free trial at Shopify.com/Bartlett. Through your journey through ancient civilizations, what have you come to learn about what this consciousness thing is, if anything at all, or at least what people believed and how their mythologies were similar?

• 1:29:59Speaker 00

  Yes, I've partly, I've partly come to this through the ancient texts. There's a very specific scene in a number of the ancient Egyptian funerary texts. It's called the judgment scene. And what you see is, you see the deceased entering into a hall, into a room, at the end of which sits the goddess Cyrus enthroned. And the deceased is led into the hall by the goddess Mart. She's recognized by a feather that she wears in her headdress. She's the goddess of truth, justice, and cosmic harmony. He enters the hall. There's

• 1:30:38Speaker 00

  a scale in the hall. In one pan of the scale is an object that represents his heart, oblique, his soul. Heart and soul were the same thing for the Egyptians in that sense. And in the other pan is the feather of Mart, the feather of truth, harmony, and cosmic justice. You do not want your heart to outweigh the feather at that moment. You want, at the very least, to be in balance. And in order to be in balance, then comes into question the whole way that you've lived your life. Up on the wall of the hall, there are 42 little figures. They're

• 1:31:19Speaker 00

  called the 42 negative assessors. Each one of them is going to ask you a question. Did you steal? Did you kill? Actually, the 10 commandments are all in there and a lot more as well. Ideally, you should be able to answer no to all of those questions. But the ancient Egyptians always understood how frail human beings are and that we can always make mistakes. The question is, what do we do when we make a mistake? Do we learn from it? Or do we keep on repeating it? And what I read into that is, you were given, you, the deceased, you were given an incredible opportunity. We allowed you to be born in a human body. You could have a range of experiences that no other physical form on your planet could

• 1:32:00Speaker 00

  have. You, you, you had this huge brain. You had this enormous capacity. We gave it this to you. What did you do with it? Did you use it well? Or did you squander it and waste it? And at that moment, you'd better be there with some answers about how you used it well. So as I come towards the end of my life, I look very carefully at my life. And I try to undo wrongs that I have done in the past, if I can. And I try to make sure I don't do any more in the future. I want to be a nurturing and positive and useful person to the people around me.

• 1:32:38Steven Bartlett?

  The, the health situation you've gone through has clearly made you quite introspective, probably more so than you, you might have been 10 years ago, I'm guessing.

• 1:32:44Speaker 00

  Oh, yeah, absolutely. I was still immortal 10 years ago. Listen, each and every one of us, every single human being on this planet, could die in the next minute. Life is that fragile. It's that sudden. You can never predict how long you're going to live. But what something like this does, it focuses the mind. And it does make me wish more and more that I can leave this life with as few regrets as possible. And that I can feel that I played a useful and positive role in the life of others, and that I even played

• 1:33:22Speaker 00

  in some way, a useful and positive role in the life of the species to which I belong.

• 1:33:30Steven Bartlett?

  Are you happy?

• 1:33:33Speaker 00

  I am very happy in a lot of ways. I'm blessed to have lived the life I've lived, to have traveled the world, to have the adventures that I have had. I am blessed with a beautiful and wonderful wife and companion, my wife, Samantha.

• 1:33:51Steven Bartlett?

  You've got this wonderful picture of her.

• 1:33:53Speaker 00

  Yeah, that's me and Samantha. We met when we were about 40 years old. And I don't think we've been apart more than four days in the entire 30 plus years since then.

• 1:34:07Steven Bartlett?

  Wow.

• 1:34:08Speaker 00

  We do everything together. We travel together. Samantha's a photographer, brilliant photographer. And, and, and I do not have a great visual eye. So we work together. I do the words, Samantha does the pictures. We have the adventures together. We did the scuba diving together. Samantha nearly lost her life twice in intense currents scuba diving. She's brave. She's an adventurer. She's a wonderful mother. This is so important. Samantha and I have six children between us. Samantha brought two from her previous marriage. I brought two from my first marriage and two from my second marriage. So six children from three broken marriages is a potential disaster. Samantha brought them all together into a group of loving, deeply committed siblings who care for one another, who are constantly

• 1:34:53Speaker 00

  in each other's lives, who are there to support one another. Samantha did that by just being a brilliant, loving person. So I'm very happy to have such a great partner who's stood by me through thick and thin, and who's brought out these wonderful characters in, in our children and now our grandchildren, you know, nine grandchildren, six grandkids. All of it's down to Samantha.

• 1:35:17Steven Bartlett?

  It's remarkable that through all the wonders of human history and all the things we talked about, that love, like this kind of romantic love is so central, so important, so central to our happiness. I just thought, oh, it's, it's just a wonderful reminder of how easy it is to get caught up in the material and, and all the toxic, whereas, you know, so much of it comes from just the simplicity of falling in love with someone.

• 1:35:42Speaker 00

  Love is what it's all about. And, and love is, love is giving. It's giving yourself to somebody else. It's putting the other person. Sorry, I'm gonna end up crying. This, this is what my wife does all the time with everybody. She puts other people first. And

• 1:36:03Speaker 00

  others benefit enormously from that. I'm very fortunate. I think, I think if I hadn't met Samantha when I did, and we hadn't formed this joint life, I think I would have made nothing of my life, nothing at all. I think it would have just gone down the tubes. I needed a loving steering hand at that point. Anyway, very lucky. I, I am happy. There are things that make me unhappy, of course, just like every, every, every other human being. I don't understand why those who are bitterly opposed to my work want to try and present me as some kind of fraud or grifter. But I suppose it's a easy way to lazily dismiss

• 1:36:43Speaker 00

  somebody else. Another thing that has been used is because I've considered the possibility of a lost civilization having an influence on other known historical civilization, I've been accused of racism as well. That I've been, I've been accused of taking away the authenticity of indigenous achievements. And, and that again, has been without, without any receipts. It's not been, it's just thrown out there as an accusation. Now, for me, with, with a multi-ethnic family, that racism abuse that has been thrown at me constantly is extremely hurtful and extremely painful. It's one of the few things that have been

• 1:37:25Speaker 00

  thrown at me that I actually cannot forgive. It's unforgivable to use that lazy, easy dismissal. In a society where a lot of people don't read anymore, I mean, pretty much guarantee people who hear that on the internet, they're not going to go and read the books and actually find out what I said. They're just gonna take it as face value. So that does hurt, and it does make me sad. But generally, I'm blessed. I'm lucky. I've lived a fantastic, privileged life. I've explored the world. I'm surrounded by love and onwards and upwards as far as I'm concerned.

• 1:38:01Steven Bartlett?

  Well, you know, Graham, I think at the end of the day, the thing that endures is the impact, the curiosity that you've, you've provoked in people, allowed them to wander beyond the narrowness of our lives, which is quite miserable. A narrow life is, feels quite like a miserable life, where you can't be open-minded and explore. And, and that's why I love these conversations. It's not to say that I, that I always accept when I have these kind of conversations, everything to be 100% true. But the net benefit for me is just expanding my mind to possibility. And like, please don't rob me of the opportunity to expand my mind to possibility. What would my life become without possibility or hope or all these things? And, and actually, when I look at graphs like this, that show how our beliefs and scientific understanding has changed, even in recent times, as, as

• 1:38:46Steven Bartlett?

  recent as 2017, on this particular graph, I go, well, I have some arrogance to assume that I know it all today.

• 1:38:52Speaker 00

  Totally. Things, things are constantly changing. You know, every turn of the spade in an archaeological dig can change the whole story, change the whole story. This is not limited to archaeology. This is found in all fields where there are specialists, that they, they tend to get locked into a particular reference frame and actually defend it in a territorial way. It becomes like a war. And they've, they've, they feel absolutely responsible to defend that territory against all comers and will use any dirty tricks that are needed to be used in order to defeat the enemy. So you asked me a straightforward question, am I happy? Yes, I am happy. And I honestly answered you that there are certain things, particularly the racism assaults on me that do make me extremely unhappy.

• 1:39:36Steven Bartlett?

  What else do I need to know about the, the possibility of an ancient civilization that might inform how I think about myself, my life, and I guess also our future? What I found so fascinating is especially we're in a moment of this AI revolution, where you've got these sort of big forces. Have you got nuclear weapons over here? You've now got this advanced intelligence. There's humanoid robots on the horizon. And if there was ever a moment where the word, you know, existential is being used in a, in a way that is probably appropriate, for me, it feels like now.

• 1:40:06Speaker 00

  Yeah, it feels like now to me too. This is, no doubt, our species is poised on the edge of an abyss right now. Our technology has outgrown our mentality. And we're not, we're not in good shape to deal with the challenges that lie ahead. I, unfortunately, the chances of a nuclear exchange are just higher and higher. And that's just a realistic assessment of the way the world is with these maniacal leaders. So what could we learn from the past? We can, I, I believe we can learn that there's another way to live, that we don't have to do it this way. That's, that's something I believe.

• 1:40:45Steven Bartlett?

  Okay, I believe.

• 1:40:46Speaker 00

  That's something I don't know.

• 1:40:47Steven Bartlett?

  Okay.

• 1:40:48Speaker 00

  I guess I'm optimistic that human beings have made it through all these centuries, all these thousands of years, all these hundreds of thousands of years, that we've made it through. We've made terrible mistakes and terrible things. I mean, look at the Second World War. God, no, how many people were killed there? 20 million Russians alone, if I remember correctly. It was just horrific, absolute horror. It's all, when I was born in 1950, the Second World War was only five years away and the end of it. And it hung over us, you know, you, our, our generation were aware of that. But it seems to me, people today aren't aware of the horror of global war in the way that they were. And, and, and

• 1:41:29Speaker 00

  that adds to the, to the danger that we will immolate ourselves. I think a new approach to the nature of reality is really vital. I think we, we need to begin to understand consciousness better. And what I would wish for the human species. Is that we understand we are actually all one, incredibly diverse, full of creativity and differences, but but all one. And a mother in the middle of Sub-Saharan Africa and a mother in New York City, they love their kids in exactly the same way. They hope for their kids in exactly the same way. There's no difference between them at all.

• 1:42:11Speaker 00

  As long as we're as long as we're indoctrinated into this notion of divisive differences. I'm all in favor of differences between human beings. That's part of our creativity as our species, but divisive differences. That's what's going to kill us off. And that's, I think, the message that comes down from the past. Whether it's a correct message or not, the message is we, a former civilization, made a terrible mistake and it resulted in a cataclysm that brought us down. I think we need to realize that can't happen again and that we are most likely to be the cause of that cataclysm ourselves.

• 1:42:55Speaker 00

  There may, there may be a danger of further comet impacts. The Younger Dryas comet fragments, it's called the Torrid Meteor Stream. The Earth passes through it twice a year, in June and in October, November. There are hundreds of deadly objects in the Torrid Meteor Stream. It could happen, but I think a much more likely way that we're going to bring our civilization back almost to the Stone Age is nuclear war. We're going to do it to ourselves unless we wake up, unless we become more conscious of what it is to be a human being, of the privilege and the gift of being a human being

• 1:43:36Speaker 00

  and how that privilege of gift belongs to every human being, not just to us. But I don't know how that's going to be done. I do think psychedelics can play a role. I've said many times, and I'll say it again, if I, if I had the power to do so, I would insist that every world leader has at least, at least a dozen sessions of ayahuasca before they even apply for the job.

• 1:44:01Steven Bartlett?

  Because you believe that would give them the same feeling of oneness?

• 1:44:04Speaker 00

  I think most of them wouldn't apply for the job at all.

• 1:44:07Steven Bartlett?

  Oh, really?

• 1:44:07Speaker 00

  And those who did would would probably do a much better job. Because they'd understand themselves better.

• 1:44:15Steven Bartlett?

  Graham, what is the most important thing we haven't discussed as it relates to our past and what it might teach us or how it might inform how we choose to live our lives today that we haven't discussed?

• 1:44:27Speaker 00

  Look, the most important thing as far, as far as I'm concerned, is independent inquiry. We need to start thinking for ourselves and that's true of the past and it's true of everything else. To the, to the extent that I, that I do get positive feedback from young people, and I do a lot, that feedback is, thank you for being an example to question everything. It happens that what I'm questioning is the past, but that can be a model for questioning everything. I, I feel that, that very poor journalism being used to smear my name because I asked

• 1:45:09Speaker 00

  questions and because I asked them vigorously and because, most important of all, I reached a large audience. That's it, really. They won't smear, smear your name if you don't reach a large audience. You're not worth their trouble.

• 1:45:22Steven Bartlett?

  I know the feeling.

• 1:45:23Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:45:24Steven Bartlett?

  But I think, but you know, for me, my thing has always been that, um, all it's done has made me clearer, like, you know, if you have a bigger platform, more people watching you, et cetera, and talking about you, all it's done for me is made me clearer on my principles and what I believe.

• 1:45:38Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:45:38Steven Bartlett?

  And I'm actually really thankful for that in a weird way.

• 1:45:40Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:45:41Steven Bartlett?

  Because you're forced to, you know, when you hear so many things said, said about you or written about you, whatever, it does focus one's minds on, okay, like, who am I?

• 1:45:47Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:45:47Steven Bartlett?

  And what matters? What am I, where am I uncompromising in terms of the conversations I want to have, the way I want to do it? And that's given me a huge amount of clarity. And one of the things that I'm really, I really want to make sure is that it doesn't make me bitter or resentful in any way.

• 1:46:02Speaker 00

  Very important.

• 1:46:03Steven Bartlett?

  And you can see how it happens.

• 1:46:05Speaker 00

  Yeah, I can absolutely see how it happens.

• 1:46:07Steven Bartlett?

  Because you, you have to live with this sort of injustice potentially or being mischaracterized, whatever. So it's easy to see how one can slip off into bitterness and resentment and to...

• 1:46:18Speaker 00

  That's, that's a big part of the work I'm doing on myself at the moment. I, I'm confident that I am doing the right thing with my life. I'm doing no harm to anyone and I'm putting ideas out there that are worth thinking about. I'm confident of that. I have no, I have no doubts about that.

• 1:46:33Steven Bartlett?

  And what will you care about on your, on your last day?

• 1:46:37Speaker 00

  Most of all, the love of my family. That's the most important thing to me. And I don't know, the feeling that I did my best. I did the best I could to carry out the task that fell upon me, quite by accident. I didn't, I was a current affairs journalist in the 1980s. I had no idea I was going to go down this rabbit hole into the ancient world. It was a series of accidents that led to it, but having gone down it, I feel very, very, very committed to it.

• 1:47:14Steven Bartlett?

  It's interesting because one of the ways that I am, I've always chosen to conduct my interviews is just to judge people as I find them. I remember once upon a time I had Brian Johnson coming on my podcast and, you know, he's quite a, he's a, he has some radical beliefs about living forever, et cetera. He's the longevity guy. And I remember one of my team members walking up to me beforehand and saying, before he had arrived and saying, what do you think of him? And I remember saying, I have no idea, I've not met him yet.

• 1:47:35Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:47:35Steven Bartlett?

  And then I sat down with him, had this interview, and he said this thing to me at the end of the interview where he goes, thank you. And I go, what do you mean? He goes, thank you. This is the first time I've done an interview in my life where the interviewer had like no preconceptions of me. And he goes, it meant that I was relaxed and able to be myself and blah, blah, blah. And I, and I say that because my opinion of you is someone who is really curious about, about humanity and has this interesting idea that is really expansive for one's mind about what could have happened. And again, the net benefit for me of that is just expanding my mind in a way that makes me empathetic to other people.

• 1:48:12Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:48:12Steven Bartlett?

  Makes me feel like me and you aren't different.

• 1:48:15Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:48:16Steven Bartlett?

  Like, I've met you today, but we're probably, you know, we, we, we go back a long way. Maybe consciously we're the same, but in our history, in our lineage, we are, we are one of the same. And it also gives me a huge amount of respect for other living things, including my ancestors. In a way that you kind of think of your ancestors as these like monkeys that lived in trees potentially.

• 1:48:37Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:48:38Steven Bartlett?

  But actually hearing some of these stories makes me go, oh my gosh. And actually, it gives me a huge sense of responsibility to leave this planet and this Earth in a way that's going to be good for, you know, the future, the future kids that will live 20,000 years from now in the future and that'll probably look at our fossil records in wonder.

• 1:48:54Speaker 00

  I, I think, I think those of us who have a, a platform do have a responsibility. Very, very, very definitely. I mean, we're living in this strange new world. The, the, this world was inconceivable, even in the beginning of the 1990s. This, this, this world of communication that we live in now. And there's no doubt that, that this is where influence can be applied. And, and if that influence is encouraging all that's good in the human race, then that's really great. It's a wonderful thing. And if it's encouraging all that's dark and negative and cruel and unkind and vicious in the human race, because that's also out there on the internet, then it's not so good.

• 1:49:36Steven Bartlett?

  Graham, we have a closing tradition on the show where the last guest leaves the question for the next, not knowing who they're leaving it for. And the question left for you is, is there a danger of us sleepwalking into worshiping a machine god?

• 1:49:50Speaker 00

  You want me to answer that question? Yes, we're already worshiping a machine god. As I said earlier in our discussion, in the minds of many, science has already been elevated to occupy the space that was once occupied by religions. That is a belief in a machine fundamentally that's taking place there. Science should be seen as a tool, one amongst many tools, that we as human beings have at our disposal. It should never be the only tool and it should never be worshipped. I don't ever want to hear the words, trust the science. The words for me are investigate the science. See whether it's right for you or not.

• 1:50:33Speaker 00

  See what else is available in the, in the, in the situation. Don't just routinely, without thought, without question, trust the science. Don't do that. That's, that's betraying science as well. One of the fundamental ethics of science is not to trust the science, is to question and challenge the science. That's what we should be doing with the science. And yes, we are in danger of creating a kind of multi-dimensional machine which reaches into all aspects of human consciousness and, and controls us. Yeah. We've got to stop worshiping science. That's for sure. We've got to put it in its rightful place as an incredibly valuable tool, which, which

• 1:51:17Speaker 00

  can do great things for human beings, but which can also do terrible harm and damage.

• 1:51:21Steven Bartlett?

  Because when we trust science, there's something we stop listening to?

• 1:51:25Speaker 00

  Well, when you put your trust in anything, you better have good reason to put your trust in it. If I, if I'm going to trust another human being with my life, I, I really want to know that I can trust that person. I'm not just going to say, oh, you're a doctor, so I trust you. No, it's not, that's not enough. I want to know more about that doctor. And indeed, I have pursued that just recently. Science is great. Science is really useful, but we're not, we're not being what we should be. We're not living up to the potential that the universe gave us if we just go around trusting everything all the time. We're here to ask questions. That's what we've got these enormous brains for and this incredible connectivity is to

• 1:52:10Speaker 00

  ask questions. Anybody who says, don't ask questions is doing a great deal of harm.

• 1:52:15Steven Bartlett?

  Well, I hope my audience are very curious and I think they must be by now if they're still hanging around on this platform.

• 1:52:21Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 1:52:21Steven Bartlett?

  Because we've had lots of very curious conversations and hopefully expansive. I, we have this acronym, DOAC, obviously stands for diarosio, but also we think of it as like being for dreamers and open-minded people, which is the O and the A being about expanding awareness and the C really being about feeling more connected.

• 1:52:36Speaker 00

  Brilliant.

• 1:52:37Steven Bartlett?

  Like hearing your story and about your, your partner and your journey and your parents all makes me all, you know, I think it does, it makes us like spiritually connected in a way that's increasingly rare. If people want to learn and read more from you, Graham, where do they go? I mean, you've written so many wonderful books. You've got another one on the way. I'll link all of these books you've written and the others that aren't here below.

• 1:52:57Speaker 00

  Okay. Very briefly, the, the, the book that put me on the map was Fingerprints of the Gods.

• 1:53:04Steven Bartlett?

  Yeah.

• 1:53:04Speaker 00

  And that's the book where I really investigate, begin to investigate the possibility of a lost civilization. Before that came The Sign and the Seal, which was, which was about Ethiopia's claim to possess the lost Ark of the Covenant. It happened that as a reporter in the 1980s, I spent a lot of time in Ethiopia and I came across this tradition, which is fundamental to all religious life in Ethiopia. And, and ended up writing a book about it. That put me on the track of a lost civilization, led to Fingerprints of the Gods. Then after Fingerprints of the Gods, there's a book that's not here, which is Keeper of Genesis that I wrote with Robert Bovall, Underworld. This was seven years of scuba diving that Santan and I did all around the world, following

• 1:53:49Speaker 00

  up tips from local fishermen, local divers. They'd seen something interesting, something that looked man-made at a depth of 30 meters, just offshore there, and they would take us and we would find it. So Underworld is about all those flooded continental shelves. 27 million square kilometers of continental shelf were flooded at the end of the Ice Age. That's 27 million square kilometers. That's Europe and China and a bit more combined, where the best real estate on Earth 20,000 years ago and are all underwater today.

• 1:54:22Steven Bartlett?

  And, and there's signs that there was life there?

• 1:54:23Speaker 00

  Oh, yeah, absolutely. Absolutely.

• 1:54:25Steven Bartlett?

  Civilizations there?

• 1:54:26Speaker 00

  Yeah. Well, we found very large structures underwater. So that's, that's Underworld. Then after Underworld, I wrote Supernatural, which is that one there, which has been reissued in America under the title Visionary. And that's where I went deep into the shamanistic medicines, the, the ayahuasca, psilocybin, and, and the whole notion that cave art, the art that we see in the painted caves, is an art of visions, that this is shamans who had entered deeply altered states of consciousness, they'd remembered what they'd seen, and when they came back to the everyday state of consciousness, they painted their visions in caves.

• 1:55:09Speaker 00

  It's the best explanation for cave arts and why cave art is so similar all around the world and so similar to the visions of ayahuasca shamans to this day.

• 1:55:18Steven Bartlett?

  Graham, thank you so much for all that you do. I, I won't repeat every, all the reasons why, but you've, you've blown my mind open in a way that's just driven curiosity. And I think that's maybe the start of all inquiries, deep curiosity. And that's what you've done for not just myself, but the hundreds of millions of people that have watched you over the years, all over the world. And I hope, long may it continue and good luck with your heart operation. And hopefully we'll be back again to continue this conversation soon.

• 1:55:39Speaker 00

  Absolutely. Thank you very much.

• 1:55:41Steven Bartlett?

  Appreciate it.

• 1:55:41Speaker 00

  Thank you. Really good to meet you.

• 1:55:43Steven Bartlett?

  Thank you so much. That's brilliant.