Ethereum is Hilariously Underpriced | Will SOL Flip ETH?

Someone has to say it. ETH price at $2.2k is hilarious. Everyone is out here trading "what ifs" this cycle when Ethereum has fundamentals. Let us tell you why $2.2k ETH doesn't make any sense. ------ 🌐 AEVO's Options and Perps DEX https://bankless.cc/aevo ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🐙KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE ⁠https://k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2 https://%E2%81%A0https//k.xyz/bankless-pod-q2 ⁠ 🦊METAMASK PORTFOLIO | MANAGE YOUR WEB3 EVERYTHING ⁠https://bankless.cc/MetaMask https://%E2%81%A0https//bankless.cc/MetaMask ⚖️ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM ⁠https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum ⁠ 👾GMX | V2 IS NOW LIVE https://bankless.cc/GMX 🔗CELO | CEL2 COMING SOON https://bankless.cc/Celo 🦄UNISWAP | ON-CHAIN MARKETPLACE ⁠https://bankless.cc/uniswap ------ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Start 01:33 Ethereum is Underpriced 16:01 Will SOL Flip ETH? 38:12 Hating "Decentralization" 51:18 Changing of The Seasons ------ Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures⁠ https://www.bankless.com/disclosures%E2%81%A0

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Ryan Sean Adams?

  Hey guys, welcome to Bankless Takes. We've got a few topics for you. First of all, David, I want to talk about Ethereum. Ethereum right now is hilariously underpriced, my friend. I'm just calling it. I've gotten to the stage where I'm just a bit angry about this, and we're going to talk about it. Yeah, there's a fundamentals mismatch between the market price and what Ethereum is actually doing. We've got Bitcoin above 40K, we got token prices surging, and I want to talk to you about why I think ETH should also be surging. David, it's the market that's wrong. It's not us. What else have you got?

• 0:29David Hoffman?

  Speaking of fundamentals, does Solana have any? A notable crypto investor said that there is a 25% chance of Solana flipping Ethereum. How did he get to this number? We will do our best to unpack that.

• 0:42Ryan Sean Adams?

  Lastly, I want to tell you why I'm starting to hate debating the word decentralized or decentralization. I love the concept, but I hate what the word has become and what I think we should use instead. As always, these are the takes this week from David and myself. If you don't like our takes, there's other episodes for you, but this is where we cram it all into one concise episode. David, we've got a shout out from one of our friends and sponsors. What do they want us to know?

• 1:07David Hoffman?

  AVO, previously known as Ribbon Finance, how you might know them, has been dominating the DeFi landscape with 70% market share in options and perps. They are now launching AEUSD. So while you do your trading of options and perps, you also get 4.7% yield while you do so, thanks to the AEUSD. You can deposit and start trading at banklist.cc/avo. That's A-E-V-O. Ryan, why is Ethereum hilariously underpriced? This is a tweet you put out not too long ago. What do you mean by this?

• 1:40Ryan Sean Adams?

  Dude, I'm just sick of it. I think, I think somebody has to say it. Somebody has to start getting loud or louder on Twitter because it's just not right, David. I feel like Ethereum is hilariously underpriced at 2.2K right now. It's very clear with Bitcoin above 40K, we are now in the bull market, and I'm seeing a lot of price pumping on like what ifs types of tokens.

• 2:03David Hoffman?

  What if price movements? Yeah.

• 2:05Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, and I think Ethereum has actual fundamentals. So I spent some time enumerating the fundamentals, and again, I don't know. There's some price point at which Ethereum is fairly priced, but in a bull market, I don't think that price is 2.2K, right? I think it's a lot higher. I spent some time enumerating this in contrasting Ethereum right now versus the start of the last bull cycle. And I remember the start of the last bull cycle, Bitcoin had its run, DeFi tokens had its run. And at some point in time, a number of us, myself included, just said enough is enough. ETH at like 200 is hilarious. It is stupid. And I started this thread at this time to just track the number as it went up.

• 2:50Ryan Sean Adams?

  Started 200, then it went to 300, then it went to 500, and then above 1,000. It started to become more fairly priced, you know? And I started tapered off after things got above 2K, where I am feeling similarly about Ethereum right now. And here's what's different from last cycle to this cycle. David, first of all, Ethereum now makes 2.7 billion in annualized profits.

• 3:12David Hoffman?

  That is fee revenue collected versus Ether issued.

• 3:16Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. And you could see all of this on ultrasound money, by the way. And if you contrast this with like, if you like a price to earnings, I mean, how much are you paying for Ether market cap versus how much it's earning in terms of profit? It's at $2.7 billion. The PE ratio, which is a common metric used in the stock market, a common metric used for any capital asset, whether you're renting a house or you're trying to value a stock, the PE ratio of Ethereum right now is 98. Okay? That is relatively low. Contrast that with Amazon. Amazon's about 75 right now. So the amount that you're paying for $1 of earnings is $75 with Amazon. Okay?

• 3:58David Hoffman?

  What that means 98 to 75 is that the market is pricing in that Ethereum will grow at least 25% faster than Amazon, to put it like reductively.

• 4:08Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, 25%. Is that a conservative estimate to you? Feels that way to me.

• 4:13David Hoffman?

  If Amazon is a massive company, how do you grow that thing very quickly?

• 4:16Ryan Sean Adams?

  I know. So you, I mean, if you look at other high-tech stocks, Salesforce right now, you know what their PE is, David?

• 4:23David Hoffman?

  I think like I saw Netflix at one point in time was at 400.

• 4:26Ryan Sean Adams?

  Netflix goes to 400 Salesforce right now, like a customer relationship management software, software as a service. You know, it's been 163 is their P/E ratio. Zoom is 150.

• 4:39David Hoffman?

  Also dumb. I mean, maybe that's fair, but something is dumb here because Ethereum's only 98.

• 4:45Ryan Sean Adams?

  The global settlement system for the world potentially, that's the total addressable market we're playing at is only 98. And to me, that seems ludicrous. Compare that to last cycle. All right, David, we like, I don't know what our P/E was like infinity. It was actually in the negative because Ethereum wasn't even profitable. And now it's throwing off 2.7 billion in cash. And might I remind folks, the only profitable chain. All right. So this is not like the other chains.

• 5:10David Hoffman?

  And Tron.

• 5:11Ryan Sean Adams?

  Oh, Tron.

• 5:12David Hoffman?

  Tron.

• 5:12Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. Shout out.

• 5:13David Hoffman?

  Ethereum and Tron.

• 5:14Ryan Sean Adams?

  Shout out Justin Sun, Tron. So that, that, that's my first point. I think that is completely different than last cycle. Also, David, I was looking at ultrasound money yet again, which is a fantastic place to go view all of the Ethereum fundamentals. And you know, who are the highest block space buyers?

• 5:31David Hoffman?

  Oh, let me, let me guess.

• 5:32Ryan Sean Adams?

  Last cycle.

• 5:32David Hoffman?

  Protocols are other protocols.

• 5:35Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yes. And a new entrant here. Okay. So I looked at the past seven days. If you do that, of the top 10 block space buyers, consumers of Ethereum block space, five of those were layer twos over the past seven days. That is an entirely net new demand agent, consumer of Ethereum block space that we didn't have in 2020, the start of last bull run. Entire blockchains are now purchasing Ethereum block space. All right. No other chain has this, by the way. That is bullish, my friend. Like so, Arbitrum can bundle hundreds of thousands, potentially millions of transactions into one concise atomic blockchain purchase of Ethereum block space.

• 6:17Ryan Sean Adams?

  You have entire chains that are new purchasing agents for Ethereum block space right now. That is bullish. I think in particular compared to last cycle is pretty unique to Ethereum at this point.

• 6:28David Hoffman?

  And I would also add Arbitrum, Polygon, ZK Sync, Optimism, they all have their chain development kit, which is about the freedom to fork their chain development kit. So at that, anyone can be a chain that settles on Ethereum. Anyone can spin up a protocol that consumes Ethereum block space. So the BD teams of these layer twos are also working at establishing more and more network effects around the actual settlement of all chains into the same shared block space. And so if the success of these BD teams is at all meaningful, then all of a sudden they're spinning up more chains that are consuming more block space.

• 7:06Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. I mean, how many net new layer twos do you think will get this cycle, David?

• 7:10David Hoffman?

  More than I can think of today.

• 7:13Ryan Sean Adams?

  Like at least hundreds. So those are all net new buyers of Ethereum block space. There will be some power law winners there. Another point that's different from last cycle in 2020. Ethereum is going to be deflationary this entire cycle.

• 7:27David Hoffman?

  Right. It already is. It already is.

• 7:28Ryan Sean Adams?

  It already is. Last time it inflated at about 4%. So between 3 and 4%, depending on what the burn was during kind of the most, this time it'll be at least negative 0.5% deflationary from a supply perspective.

• 7:42David Hoffman?

  We have never seen the full, a full market cycle where Ethereum was deflationary. We had EIP, we had the merge happen late 2022, like at the end of the bull market. We have never seen like when all of the massive amounts of demand for Ethereum block space was happening, it was all pre-merge. We have never seen a full cycle of complete Ethereum deflation. We do not know how, how hot the burn can get.

• 8:07Ryan Sean Adams?

  It can, it can get pretty hot. I, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw like one to 2% for like periods of time, maybe weeks, maybe months, but like we've never been net deflationary in a bull market and this time we will be. Another point, David. Okay. So we've been talking about Ethereum as if it's valued as a capital asset and is a pretty attractive PE ratio, like relative to other growth tech stocks. That's not even factoring in the monetary premium that Ethereum, Ether, the asset can actually have, right? So if you look at something like gold, you know, 10 to 20% of its use is industrial, right? It's like, kind of like a ingredient, a commodity to produce other goods. It's a consumable product. The rest of that value of the, you know, eight to

• 8:51Ryan Sean Adams?

  $10 trillion of value that is in the market cap of gold, that's all monetary premium. That's because people use it as money. They use it as a collateral. They use it as a store of value. Well, Ethereum and Ether, the asset is a store of value, is a collateral source in the Ethereum economy. Okay. And the 98 PE, that's just valuing it as a capital asset. There's actually a dial-

• 9:12David Hoffman?

  That's only one part of the triangle that is valued at 98.

• 9:16Ryan Sean Adams?

  So there's a dial on ultrasound money where you can just like, you crank this up to the-

• 9:22David Hoffman?

  Make it equivalent to gold, equivalent to gold. Yeah.

• 9:24Ryan Sean Adams?

  Equivalent monetary premium of gold.

• 9:25David Hoffman?

  Because that's table stakes. If crypto meets gold at par in terms of money, I will consider that the bearish case for crypto. We are here to be, at least be gold.

• 9:36Ryan Sean Adams?

  So gold is like a 10x above its utility value in terms of monetary premium. If you did that for Ethereum, just add 10x to it. It would be, already be worth 22K.

• 9:46David Hoffman?

  Yeah.

• 9:46Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay. And, and-

• 9:47David Hoffman?

  And this, okay. So this, it's worth 22K if we give ETH monetary premium, equivalent amount of gold and at a PE ratio equivalent to Amazon, which again, I would consider both of these the conservative versions of the long form of these things.

• 10:02Ryan Sean Adams?

  Sure. And people can adjust that however they want. If you don't believe in monetary premium, you just want to view Ethereum as a capital asset, well, great. It's, you know, PE of 98 right now. Okay. If you want to crank that to like 10x- Then you then you have the monetary premium value. So the other point that's different this cycle, David, bondholders, Ethereum bondholders, we call these validators, they're getting paid, my friends. So right now, ultrasound money is about 5.3% inflation rate. So if you add issuance, which is about 3.1, you add kind of the fees, the tips for block space themselves, MEV, so the tip that you receive for block space ordering, you get about 5.3% on your E field.

• 10:44David Hoffman?

  Which goes which goes up when block space demand also goes up. So 5.3% is the current floor in this like early stage bull market environment.

• 10:53Ryan Sean Adams?

  And people say, well, a lot of chains have yields, like any staking chain has yields. Okay, but the difference is Ethereum has real yields, not just nominal yields. A lot of the issuance, when you're doing proof of stake on other chains, if they're not, if they're inflating as much as they are dishing out to validators, it's just a nominal increase.

• 11:11David Hoffman?

  Yields are like 10% and inflation is like 7%. So actually, you're only getting 3%.

• 11:18Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, and oftentimes it's even less than that, right? It's like there's kind of a delta there. So this is all 100% real yield versus like nominal yield, which I think.

• 11:27David Hoffman?

  Not just not just 100%. So it's 5.3% real yield, and then you add on the 1% deflation, the half a percent deflation that we're currently experiencing, you add on both of those things.

• 11:38Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. Okay, here's another thing, David. This cycle, Bitcoin is very likely, hopefully January, when you go destroy Gary Gensler's Horcrux, is going to get a spot ETF in the US. We've done episodes on this. This is going to unlock trillions in capital. Guess what else is likely going to happen this cycle? I give this a 80% probability, my my, talking to all the analysts. Ethereum is going to get a spot ETF as well. Okay, it'll be Bitcoin and Ethereum, and no one else is really close in getting through the gauntlet of getting a, like, it took 13 years for Bitcoin to get here. Okay, it's taking seven for Ethereum. No one else is going to be ready this cycle. And we've done entire episodes on this. This unlocks

• 12:19Ryan Sean Adams?

  trillions in potential capital. Okay, so, and what I would say, an amplifier for this, now that Ethereum, do you remember last cycle, people were upset about crypto, investing in crypto? It's like, it's not ESG friendly. Look at all the proof of work, like NFTs are bad because they burn so much energy. All right. If you look at a Bitcoin or Ether ETF, only one of those is actually like ESG friendly right now. Only one of those doesn't burn any like, you know, carbon. Whether you care about that, Bankless listener, it's kind of irrelevant to the narrative of like-

• 12:50David Hoffman?

  Because the market wants that. And if that's not your values, that's fine, but the market loves that as well.

• 12:56Ryan Sean Adams?

  So that's what we got. We got the only asset to get a spot ETF, and it's the only asset to get a spot ETF aside from Bitcoin, but it's the only asset to be ESG friendly with the spot ETF. So that is bullish from an inflows perspective.

• 13:11David Hoffman?

  Oh, I've got, I've got more to add to that.

• 13:13Ryan Sean Adams?

  Oh, please.

• 13:14David Hoffman?

  Yeah. So the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, this is something that's echoed by Matt Hogan at Blockwise and a few other, other places. Ethereum as an instrument, as a financial instrument, is just more interesting to traditional market investors because it looks and feels like a high-growth tech stock in comparison to Bitcoin, which is a little bit more on the money side, which is, you know, honestly confusing to a lot of investors. And so while Bitcoin has maybe 2.5, 3X the market size of Ethereum, I think Ethereum itself out punches above its weight class in terms of external market demand, simply because it's viewed as a software tech stock platform, which is easier to categorize in like the high gross at-risk assets that

• 13:58David Hoffman?

  traditional investors will categorize it in. So, I mean, it's not going, it's probably not going to meet Bitcoin in terms of external capital demand, but it's going to punch above its weight class in terms of its market cap versus how much external demand that there is. This is what is the vibe that has been reported by people who speak to traditional investors out in this space.

• 14:18Ryan Sean Adams?

  I think, Bankless listener, David and I could go on with these takes.

• 14:22David Hoffman?

  There's, there's like the Eigenlayer increasing the ETH yield.

• 14:27David Hoffman?

  There is, if Ether being sent out to other chains, being the money for other chains, which is something that we saw in last bull market. The monetary premium of ETH is strong. People need low liquidity chains, low TVL chains, need to have Ether as the money in their system because their system's not money either. Like, the, the growth of the Ether unit of account has been up only.

• 14:51Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. I just like, you know, as an Ether investor and watching the rest of the market kind of like rage and Ether hasn't followed suit, right? I'm actually past the cope phase. This isn't even cope. This is, now I'm in the phase, and I remember I was in this phase in 2022, whereas I'm just objectively like angry about this. Like, it's stupid. Just call it what it is. It's stupid. And I think there's a ton of investors in the Ethereum community who are looking at this. Like, this tweet got, this tweet got massive traction, basically. And we're all looking at Ether.

• 15:23David Hoffman?

  Your tweet that you were pointing out, which is like, I'm recapping this.

• 15:26Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. And we're all looking at Ether and we're like, everybody is chasing these what ifs and Ethereum has fundamentals.

• 15:32David Hoffman?

  Everyone's going down the market cap stack, going down on the risk curve.

• 15:35Ryan Sean Adams?

  And it's stupid. So whether the market catches up to that or not, I'm feeling very comfy with these fundamentals and I'm just gonna, you know, keep being angry until ETH is, you know, a little closer to 10K at least, David. So, you know, I'm gonna keep tweeting this, 5K and below at least.

• 15:52David Hoffman?

  So this is your narrative, Ryan? Or is this fundamentals?

• 15:56Ryan Sean Adams?

  That good question.

• 15:57David Hoffman?

  Which is this?

• 15:58Ryan Sean Adams?

  What's the difference? What's the difference? Should we talk about that?

• 16:00David Hoffman?

  Sure.

• 16:01Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay, so there was another narrative, I think, going on in crypto Twitter that was the flippanting, not of Ethereum of Bitcoin, but of Solana flippanting Ethereum. A friend of the show and investor, Santiago Santos, said this on the podcast. He thinks there's a 20% chance that Solana actually flips ETH.

• 16:22Ryan Sean Adams?

  I thought we should talk about this take on Bankless.

• 16:24David Hoffman?

  Let's hear the rationale.

• 16:26Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay, so do you want to hear him explain himself?

• 16:27David Hoffman?

  Yep.

• 16:28Speaker 02

  There's a version of this next cycle where Solana flips Ethereum. I think it's a greater than 25% probability.

• 16:32Ryan Sean Adams?

  You think it's a 25% probability that Solana?

• 16:35Speaker 02

  20% probability that Solana flips Ethereum. I don't want to say this cycle doesn't necessarily mean that Ethereum shrinks in size. Solana just uniquely enables different use cases that introduces way more usage utility, therefore value.

• 16:49Ryan Sean Adams?

  So Santiago goes in more detail in a follow-up tweet. Fundamentally, the Solana case, bull case boils down to this. One, a viable scalability roadmap with more integrated network architecture, parallel execution, and local fee markets. Really cheap transactions, I think is what he's saying here. Number two, FireDancer. This is a key network upgrade for network speed, reliability, and decentralization. We've talked about this a number of times on Bankless. Again, this is MaxThroughPutTPS, built by Jump Capital, by the way. Number three, talking to teams has made me appreciate use cases. So Santiago is a VC, so he's talking to the devs, which is definitely what you should be doing.

• 17:31Ryan Sean Adams?

  And appreciate use cases that are only possible in Solana.

• 17:35David Hoffman?

  Only possible on Solana, opos.

• 17:38Ryan Sean Adams?

  Number four, the ecosystem survived FTX and is flourishing, similar to Ethereum post-Dow hack and fork. I definitely agree with that one. Let's talk about these others, maybe contrast them. First of all, some people are saying this is more narrative than it is actual fundamentals.

• 17:57David Hoffman?

  I would be one of these people.

• 17:58Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay, what's your take on this?

• 18:01David Hoffman?

  Okay, so yeah, so this is kind of what has come to be the Solana chant. You know, FireDancer, low fees, parallel execution, local fee markets, all of the things, by the way, that Ethereum doesn't have. Like Ethereum doesn't have local fee markets. Ethereum doesn't have parallel execution.

• 18:19Ryan Sean Adams?

  Oh, it's layer one, bro.

• 18:20David Hoffman?

  On its layer one, yeah, on the Ethereum layer one.

• 18:23Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah.

• 18:23David Hoffman?

  And so like, a lot of this is just like, hey, these are, this is what Solana has that Ethereum doesn't have. It's kind of like how I will simply simplify and reduce this down to what the elements that I see.

• 18:34Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay, well Santiago says, all of these equal a 20% chance of actually flipping Ethereum. So let's say, let's, let's just, let's just quantify this. If Ethereum is valued at $1 trillion at some point in this, this market cycle, so that'd be a 4X.

• 18:49David Hoffman?

  Yeah.

• 18:50Ryan Sean Adams?

  That's a 10K ETH and above, okay? That would make, you know, Solana would have to be above 1 trillion. Let's say 1.1 trillion dollars, which would be about, I don't know, a 50X?

• 19:03David Hoffman?

  That would be Ryan, to get to, for Solana to get to 1.1 trillion, that would be a 44X, which would put Sol price at $2,640.

• 19:11Ryan Sean Adams?

  Dang, it's big.

• 19:14David Hoffman?

  I should buy, I should go buy Sol, clearly.

• 19:16Ryan Sean Adams?

  I, I, I mean, there's, but let's, let's talk about that. There's definitely a case for buying Sol, David. Right? But the question is, what is the case? Is the case fundamentals? Is it narrative? Or like, maybe there's some mess up. There's some difference in what people mean when they say fundamentals. Cause if you talk to Santiago, he would say, guys, all of these are fundamentals.

• 19:38David Hoffman?

  Yeah.

• 19:39Ryan Sean Adams?

  And, and what I point to you now, that we have kind of much more maturity in terms of our change this cycle. I'd be like, show me the revenue, show me the profits.

• 19:49David Hoffman?

  Show me the numbers.

• 19:50Ryan Sean Adams?

  Where's the 3 billion in blockchain sales?

• 19:51David Hoffman?

  Get these ideas out of my face. Show me the numbers.

• 19:54Ryan Sean Adams?

  I'm a little bit more skewed on that direction, like I.

• 19:57David Hoffman?

  The $25 billion network, show me the money.

• 20:01Ryan Sean Adams?

  A little bit, right? At, at a $1 trillion network, you better damn well be showing me how this thing is, is throwing off like, you know, 100, 10s of, 10s of billions in cash annually. Anyway, go on, what do you think's going on here?

• 20:15David Hoffman?

  Uh, okay, so here's exactly what I think is going on here. There is this tendency, I remember doing this in 2017, where I would pull out my calculator. I would perceive some likelihood about 3X on my shitcoin bags. And then I would like, you know, add those two together and then that would be my future net worth. And I would look, and so the, here's a kid. This is a meme that like, everyone should be familiar with because this is what you are going to do, bankless listener. In this bull market, you're going to pull out your calculator, you're going to put some inputs into it. And then you're going to like. You know, look at all the zeros and then you're going to get ecstatic.

• 20:51Ryan Sean Adams?

  Or a spreadsheet if you're more sophisticated.

• 20:53David Hoffman?

  Sure. Yeah, you know, yeah, but you don't, you just need your iOS app to really do it to look at all of your, your, your future rich net worth. So like the, my critique here is that there's no inputs into the calculation. And this is something that I think all bull market navigators should be aware of. Remember when Cardano finally introduced smart contracts into its system? You know what happened afterwards? Like super strongly like anticipated upgrade. Cardano was finally going to get smart contracts. It was going to enter the DeFi arena. And then it introduced smart contracts and then the token price like plummeted.

• 21:33David Hoffman?

  Because all of a sudden narrative and idea and future became present and got tested. And everyone realized like, oh, now we have so much left to build. There is a great premium for chains that are still in the idea phase. And so this is something that I think all bull market navigators should understand. Narratives are in in bull markets. Here's a response to Santiago's analysis from Kipfishy Catfish, who's a crypto Twitter account. And says, quote, can't name the use case beyond vague categories. Can't name the app that's doing the unnamed use case. Can't name where and how those users will show up. And also can't name the decade when the unnamed user will show up for the unnamed app for the unnamed use case.

• 22:18David Hoffman?

  Meanwhile, given that Solana transactions cost fractions of a penny, you need tens of billions of transactions per day before Solana breaks even on revenue versus expenses, given its inflation rate and market cap. Meanwhile, as a secular trend, the cost of transaction execution, data availability, settlement, and the amount of MEV extraction will all trend downwards. Literally everyone is working to make chains cheaper and faster. Nevertheless, Sol will do great by simply memeing, "Chain go fast." And that's normie friendly enough to obfuscate the fact that Sol won't be accruing value before 2030 because 99% of the population can't delineate between the difference between a protocol and a token. Well, enough. This is especially true when the token is a layer one gas token,

• 23:01David Hoffman?

  AKA like a layer one currency, which the market treats with irrational premiums and kid gloves. Plus, I'm sure Chris Bernuski can also prepare some scripted lines for Kathy Wood to read on CNBC about how fast and cheap it is to create some extra pumps. This entire space is deeply unserious.

• 23:19David Hoffman?

  Fishy Catfish is like a crypto Twitter and on account. And sometimes I just really appreciate these accounts who just come out and say it like it is. And I like, I just have to give it like this is, this is just.

• 23:30Ryan Sean Adams?

  Okay, but let's explain a few things that, that Fishy Catfish is saying here. He's basically, he shows a chart here, which is Solana revenue fees versus expenses. Okay, let's, let's reorient Bankless listeners to what this actually means. So the first thing you have to know about blockchains is they sell something. They sell something called.

• 23:48David Hoffman?

  Only one things, there's only one thing they sell.

• 23:51Ryan Sean Adams?

  Blockchain sell blocks. Apple sells iPhones, blockchain sell blocks. Okay, we repeat that all of the time. And there's a market price for the value of their blocks. Those are like, and the market pays for that in two ways. One, they pay for, to get their transaction in a block. Okay, and then they also pay for the ordering of the block. Okay, right now, Solana's fees, remember I was saying 2.7 billion in annualized profit? That's how much Ethereum right now annualized is making from its block space sales. Solana right now is making about $140,000 in daily fees. Okay, so that's the amount of revenue it's actually bringing in. Okay, now let's talk about costs.

• 24:35Ryan Sean Adams?

  It costs money to secure the network. How does a blockchain pay for this? In fees, but mostly through issuance. It inflates its own supply to pay those that secure the network, the army, the validators, the mercenaries that do this. Right? Bitcoin works the same way, they just pay miners. Okay, but in Ethereum and Solana, they're paying validators. In Ethereum, they're also paying validators a certain amount in terms of ETH rewards. But in Ethereum, when you subtract the revenue that's being created from block space sales, and you subtract the cost to pay validators, it's actually at a net profit of 2.7 billion per year is what we were saying. For Solana and most of the other chains out there, they are deeply unprofitable.

• 25:19Ryan Sean Adams?

  So Solana, for example, in October, they spent 42 million in terms of issuance. So that is validator expense, like cost to secure the network. And they brought in about 1 million in terms of revenue. Okay, so there's a delta there. That's why it's a deeply unprofitable chain at this point in time. That's what, that's what Catfishy is, is saying here. It's basically like. We're beyond like the speculative era of crypto. Like that was, that was series A, maybe series B. We're post some product market fit. Like, we actually are selling block space to the masses. And so you can start to compare something like Solana, you know, beyond speculative fervor, you can actually look at transaction revenue and how much it's doing, what the profitability is.

• 26:01Ryan Sean Adams?

  And maybe we should be looking at chains from that sort of fundamentals perspective and less from, just from a speculative, hey, number go up. Like it's, you know, it's valued based on a story that we tell.

• 26:13David Hoffman?

  Putting these into daily numbers. Solana collects $140,000 of daily fees, daily transaction revenue. And then it issues $11 million in sole tokens to go to validators, who similarly to Bitcoin, actually have to sell a decent amount of their soul in order to maintain their profit. Maintaining a Solana validator is actually a pretty expensive endeavor. And so that turns into sell pressure. And this is something I would say, going back to one of Santiago's rationales for why Solana has a 25% chance to flip Ethereum. One of them was FireDancer, right? Why is everyone stoked about FireDancer in the Solana ecosystem? Because it makes transactions cheaper and faster.

• 26:53David Hoffman?

  It actually reduces the amount of fees that the Solana network can take. And so there's this like identity crisis about Solana that I think is like under the, under the hood, under the iceberg. All they want to do is reduce, reduce, reduce fees. And also that will just put them further and further away from actually being able to store value in the native sole token, which goes back to what Fishy was saying, this massive critique that Fishy was saying. "The market treats with irrational premiums and kid gloves because no one can understand the difference between a protocol versus its token well enough." If there's bullish adoption on Solana, clearly that goes well for the sole token. But that is not a given. And this is something that I think the entire industry

• 27:37David Hoffman?

  has struggled to actually produce into its layer one assets, which actually kind of induces this speculative demand about the narrative of tokens, especially in bull markets. Because in bull markets, fundamentals don't matter. It's all about the story. It's all about pricing in the future. And it's also about pricing in the perceived future. Not the actual future.

• 27:57Ryan Sean Adams?

  Well, let's, let's go back to Santiago's take, though. So I actually think that there is the possibility that Solana flip-ins Ethereum. I wouldn't rate it as 20%. I would rate this as like, I don't know, in the single digit percentages. But I wouldn't completely say that, that that's not going to happen. But I think if it does so, it will do so based on narrative, not fundamentals. Because I don't see the fundamentals, when I say fundamentals, I'm talking about, you know, is the block space profitable, basically? And I don't see those rising, you know, 40x this year, let's say. And particularly when they are, you know, expanding the, the transactions per second on the Solana in the way that they are.

• 28:41Ryan Sean Adams?

  What, what chance do you give it? What, like, do you think that Solana could flip in Ethereum this cycle?

• 28:46David Hoffman?

  Yeah, so like, what are some catalysts, some soul catalysts that I can actually get behind that it doesn't have now that it could have in the future? Like, we, we give a lot of critiques, I'm about to give a lot of critiques of like, Solana TVL, and it's not that great. But that's something that could actually change. Like, more stable coins could go to Solana. ETH could go to Solana. And all of a sudden, we can get some actual real TVL into this chain. That's not, doesn't make it tied with BLAST, for example. And so another one is like reservation demand for Sol. Okay, so if Sol's not generating revenue, if Sol is inflating, if that can be offset by alternative reservation demands, as in collateral inside of DeFi applications, that can be a real fundamental.

• 29:30Ryan Sean Adams?

  Monetary premium for Sol.

• 29:31David Hoffman?

  Monetary premium for Sol, yeah. And so like, if the validators aren't able to hold on to their Sol because their operational expenses and the issuance rates are so high, then somebody else, like the other syncs for the Sol token come, come about, that can largely be DeFi. And so like, stuff like this can start to also create a narrative like, oh, the Sol is now money, right? Maybe the Solana community goes for the Sol is money phase because they realize that that's actually how you have sustainable economics at the layer one. So like, maybe that can also help propel a flipping, a narrative flipping. But I'm with you, it's in the single digits. Why do I think it's so low? I want to, I want to level check some fundamentals about Solana that we all know and love. TVL. Solana is eighth after the three major Ethereum layer twos, Arbitrum, Optimism,

• 30:16David Hoffman?

  and Polygon. Also eighth after Avalanche, another competing ETH killer. And all of these, including the Ethereum layer twos, are behind Tron and Binance Smart Chain, which are of course behind Ethereum as well. So like, it's got some TVL to accrue in the first place, even after all this excitement from Solana. And there is like, I think there was like 100,000, yeah, 100,000 active monthly users on Solana, and that has since jumped up to 175 in the last month. So there's some growing adoption here. Even after all of that, we have not seen a growth in stable coins or TVL on Solana all that much.

• 30:54Ryan Sean Adams?

  It's competitive out there, David.

• 30:56David Hoffman?

  It is competitive.

• 30:57Ryan Sean Adams?

  Like, all of these layer twos, all of these chains are launching, it's basically all the competition is going on the execution layer. And there's even, probably, I would guess there'd be up to five SVM layer two chains. That's Solana Virtual Machine, layer two chains that are trying to like, clone the success of Solana's paralyzed execution environment, and launch that as a layer two. That's going to be competitive with Solana as well. At least, I think it will be.

• 31:23David Hoffman?

  Yeah. And that's, that's just the SVM. There's also parallelized EVM teams like Monad coming on to the Ethereum, into, into the layer one space, to be honest. And so the, and also the whole narrative around Solana is the payments chain, because Visa is integrated there. I'm sorry, Ethereum's not even the payments chain. It's Tron. You have to compete with Tron, not even Ethereum. So the whole like Solana Ethereum narrative is, again, just a narrative. And that's just like the first half of fundamentals reality. The second half is like, okay, if we want Sol issuance to net out, as in we want burn on Sol, Solana does have a burn, 50% of transactions on Solana are burned, we need a 500X in transactions volume on Solana to break even, to stop issuing Sol more than

• 32:08David Hoffman?

  is burned. 500X. And then if we want to match... Ethereum in demands of in terms of deflation, which is the Solana narrative, by the way. This is the narrative that Austin articulated to me when I had him on the show. That needs to be a 1,000x in demand of Solana transaction volumes, which brings Solana to a whopping 250 billion transactions per second that it has to sustain forever in order to be at par with Ethereum's bear market deflation volumes. 250 billion transactions per second, Ryan? Does that seem reasonable? Is that a rational number?

• 32:45Ryan Sean Adams?

  So I don't think so. And I think it's time to start looking at kind of these chains from a profitability perspective. I mean, we've been doing this for 13 years, guys.

• 32:54David Hoffman?

  We've been trying to get this industry to move towards fundamentals and profitability for a cycle.

• 32:59Ryan Sean Adams?

  That said, let me flip that and let me give you the, if we're wrong, how are we wrong sort of take? You could take the, you could make the case that we are so early that competing for market share is the thing that you want to do. That profitability doesn't matter. So if you look at a startup, they don't care so much about your profit. They don't care at all. They want you to recycle all of your profit back into growth. And that in a certain way, that's essentially what Solana is doing. They don't care about profit. In fact, they're willing to dilute the existing, I'll call it in quotes, token holders, shareholders, right? Dilute them and recycle that and subsidize blockchain fees. So the Solana argument would be like, no, we're just playing a game

• 33:44Ryan Sean Adams?

  to make loss leader transactions as cheap as possible. And we don't care if we're diluting our token holders right now because we'll make that back later in network effect and maybe potential MEV. So I would say if we're wrong, David, that's how we could be wrong. I'll also say like a second thing, which is Ethereum and layer twos has not solved its UX problem right now.

• 34:10David Hoffman?

  Yep.

• 34:11Ryan Sean Adams?

  It's a really freaking stupid and hard to like, I'm moving from Ethereum to like Arbitrum and like the centralized exchange only supports Ethereum. And so I have to hop to Ethereum and then get on my layer two. And what do I do? And now I'm on this chain. Now I'm on that chain. Where are my assets? I can't even find them like. There's the other case that this cycle, right? Ethereum UX doesn't get solved. Maybe it never gets solved. And Solana just has like a better user experience. You just come on the phantom wallet. It's just everything works. You pay like nothing in transaction fees. Yeah, if you're getting like MEV attacked, you know, it doesn't matter. Users don't notice and they'll create the killer app that way.

• 34:53Ryan Sean Adams?

  So I will say like, let's be open and you have to be open to try to figure out where you're wrong. Oh, the last, the last area, I think this could be the case, which is that this whole entire crypto thing becomes less of a revolution and more like a trad fi type of thing. It's just like, everything is AML KYC'd.

• 35:13David Hoffman?

  Right.

• 35:14Ryan Sean Adams?

  Like, we don't care about, you know, non-sovereign, non-nation state store of value. It becomes a lot like an open database for traditional finance. In those conditions, then like the decentralization of Ethereum might be entirely overkill. Those are three ways I think we could be wrong on this and you have to be open to.

• 35:33David Hoffman?

  I want to unpack that last thing about decentralization and whether this crypto experiment can actually produce the censorship resistant, non-sovereign store of value money, or if it just becomes an extension of trad fi in a more efficient manner. There's a lot of perceived-ness about the word decentralization. It can mean a lot of different things. So I think we need to unpack that and that's going to come in the second half of the show. But first, a moment to talk about some of these fantastic sponsors that make this episode possible.

• 36:00Ryan Sean Adams?

  Kraken knows crypto. We are all on the journey of building a better financial system and Kraken has been leading that charge for over a decade. Crypto is world changing tech and it's Kraken's mission to accelerate the adoption of crypto so that you and the rest of the world can achieve financial freedom. Head over to kraken.com to see what crypto can be. And once you buy your assets on Kraken and you need to start exploring DeFi, make sure you explore it through your MetaMask portfolio. A deeper, more expansive way to use MetaMask that gives you the battle station you need to navigate the bull market. You can buy, swap, bridge and stake your crypto assets with ease. I already know that you have a MetaMask wallet, so go check out your MetaMask portfolio. Did you know that Arbitrum is the fourth largest?

• 36:38David Hoffman?

  Chain by economic activity in crypto? How did Arbitrum get there? Well, with low fees and fast transactions, of course. With over 600 apps on Arbitrum, the Arbitrum ecosystem has a solution for you. Whether you're into DeFi, NFTs, or you simply need a fast chain, or even if you want your own dedicated throughput with an Arbitrum orbit, Arbitrum has a home for you. Visit arbitrum.io to get started with your journey with one of the most active chains in crypto. And if you want to try out a newer Layer 2 to the Ethereum family, try out Cello, a battle-tested EVM Layer 1 that has recently decided to move to Ethereum. Cello is the mobile-first, carbon-negative blockchain built for the regenerative future. With the Cello Layer 2, gas fees will stay low, and you can even pay for gas using ERC20 tokens. Follow Cello.org on Twitter and visit cello.org

• 37:22David Hoffman?

  to shape the future of Ethereum. Uniswap Labs just released the Uniswap Mobile Wallet for iOS, the newest, easiest way to trade tokens on the go. You can easily create or import a new wallet, buy crypto on any available exchange with your debit card, and you can seamlessly swap on mainnet, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. So you can now go directly to DeFi with the Uniswap Mobile Wallet. Safe, simple custody from the most trusted team in DeFi. Download the Uniswap Wallet today on iOS. And last up, GMX, but specifically GMX V2, offering even faster on-chain trading for DeFi liquidity providers. GMX is a permissionless decentralized exchange that offers perpetual futures and spot trading. Liquidity providers receive 63% of all of GMX's protocol fees, and GMX users get a referral link to lower fees for you and your referrals.

• 38:07David Hoffman?

  Try out GMX V2 now at app.gmx.io. Now, on to the show.

• 38:12Ryan Sean Adams?

  All right, let's get into this word, David, that you alluded to, this word decentralization. I've actually, I think I've come to hate the word decentralization, not like the meaning of it. So I don't want folks to get me wrong, but just the debates about it and the lack of definition for it and the lack of context and the whole discussion around it, at least in crypto circles and on crypto Twitter, it's almost become like a form of religious warfare. It's like a supercharged word.

• 38:37David Hoffman?

  It's decentralized.

• 38:38Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah. So Fiscanti's tweeted this out. "I wish key ETH people would be as outraged about most Layer 2 security models being basically a multi-sig as they are about Lido getting bigger markets." If Fiscanti is showing a picture of Layer 2B, which is actually saying the state, showing the stage of decentralization of all of these Layer 2s. The furthest along is Arbitrum, Stage 1. We've done an entire episode about this and how they're planning to get to Stage 2. We've got optimism, which is still Stage 0. They don't have fraud proofs fully implemented, right? And so he's saying, hey, the Layer 2s you guys are talking about, they're not fully decentralized. Eman from Avalanche also says this, "It's taking a while, but finally people are beginning to realize that we all got into crypto for decentralization."

• 39:22Ryan Sean Adams?

  That's that word again, and trustlessness, and Layer 2s are leading us away from those central values. Okay, that's the, that's the take. My take was a little bit different, of course, being a Layer 2 bull. I think Layer 2s are awesome. I think Layer 2s are becoming more decentralized over time. I think the community isn't, the Ethereum community is completely aware. That's why we have like Layer 2B.

• 39:45David Hoffman?

  Why we have this website to track it in the first place.

• 39:48Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yes, and that all of the Layer 2 teams, at least the legitimate Layer 2 teams are working. They are in a competitive, you know, battle to actually become, to graduate up this chain and go from 0 to Stage 2. And to do it first, like, there's a lot of social pressure on them. There's a lot of value unlock pressure on them. And I think Ethereum is actually doing a fairly good job self-regulating it. You know, we don't want this to go from 0 to 2 right away, right? Because what if there's, what if there's a hack? What if there's a bug? Right. Like, what if you have to do something? We have some steps in between there that make logical sense. But my take is people say otherwise, they might be trying to sell you something, is my take. And that's a little feisty back to Eman.

• 40:32David Hoffman?

  There's a tweet that went around the Twitter space from this Ignis DeFi research account, which said, "Avalanche, ThorChain, and Solana are more decentralized than Ethereum." Which is in bold at the very top of the tweet. So you know, he knows that this is going to invite some critique. And then he follows up and goes, at least according to the Nakamoto coefficient. It's a measure of how many entities can collectively shut down a blockchain. Okay, so what is a Nakamoto coefficient is exactly how he said. It's this measure for the minimum number of entities that can come together to collude to shut down a blockchain. This was actually made by Satoshi Nakamoto. And it was, I think, more apt in the proof of work sense where you have large centralized mining operations.

• 41:14David Hoffman?

  And if three of them can get above 51%, then you have a Nakamoto coefficient of three. Since the evolution of proof of work, the Nakamoto coefficient, in my mind, this is my opinion, is now more of a thought experiment, more than it is actually a measurable metric. It's the thought experiment of how many entities, what is the minimum number of entities that come together that's needed to actually take down a blockchain and control a blockchain. And so it's not an actual applicable metric, but it's the thing that the Solana community loves to measure with decentralization. And so he makes this tweet, Avalanche, Thor, Chain, Solana, more decentralized than Ethereum because of this Nakamoto coefficient. In order to produce a number out of the Nakamoto coefficient,

• 41:56David Hoffman?

  you need to have extremely subjective interpretable metrics for what is actually a colluding entity. Is it, is it, is it, is Lito one entity or is it 32?

• 42:07Ryan Sean Adams?

  Well, here, for example, where Ethereum score is so low, they rate Lito as one. It's just one colluding entity.

• 42:12David Hoffman?

  Which is a subjective opinion and you can make the argument going both ways. And it really is nuanced between it's a little bit like one, it's a little bit like 32, and it's somewhere in between these things. How you determine what an entity is, is also subjective.

• 42:28Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, I think you could make the argument that, say, all the Solana validators that receive some sort of funding from the Solana Foundation, which many of them do, also only counts as one.

• 42:38David Hoffman?

  At all.

• 42:39Ryan Sean Adams?

  Right? I'm not saying that's the case. I'm just saying you can make that argument. And that's why this is such a subjective metric.

• 42:45David Hoffman?

  So my take is that if your system for measuring decentralization puts Binance, Smart Chain, Solana and Avalanche higher than Ethereum, then maybe it's actually your metric that's flawed. And this is exactly what I followed up and said with Ignis, like this just shows that this measure of decentralization is poor. And they asked, what alternative measures are more appropriate to measure decentralization?

• 43:06Ryan Sean Adams?

  Good question.

• 43:07David Hoffman?

  It is a great question. And I think we really want, we as an industry, want to be able to define and parameterize decentralization.

• 43:15Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah.

• 43:15David Hoffman?

  But if a system is actually decentralized, then it is unmeasurable because it's decentralized. It's this weird catch 22 where if something is decentralized, it's inherently hard to grasp or measure. If it is measurable, that means there is a centralization vector that you are measuring. If it's not measurable, then it's decentralized. True decentralized systems are impossible to parameterize. It's noble to try and do this. It's a good attempt. It's a good thought experiments. There are lessons to be learned here. But truly decentralized systems can only be measured in their decentralization through like tests, acid tests, right? This is why Ethereum is so focused on censorship. We have this MEV

• 43:57David Hoffman?

  Watch website to show you how many transactions or blocks are being censored by people who don't want to violate OFAX sanctions post tornado cash. That is one measure of ways you can test the decentralization of a system. Another way to test the decentralization of the system, can you download and verify a full node of that system? Can you also participate in consensus of that system? Can you add blocks to the blockchain? Are you allowed to do that? How feasible is it? How easy is it for you to join the network and be a part of the network? There's no way to truly measure decentralization. You can only test it in various different ways.

• 44:35Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, I agree with that. That's kind of my take on it is actually, I think we have to get out of this quest for a definition of this holy world word called decentralization. Because every community is going to point to their set of features and be like, oh, here it is. We found decentralization. And the non holy communities, the non sacred communities will be those that don't have that feature set and are cut outside of it. And I think this applies to Bitcoiners who talk about like, you gotta run a full archive note. And they define an archive note as a very specific thing that Ethereum has kind of a different. A definition of what a full node is. And you know, this was a debate in a religious war a couple of years ago, right? You know, Solana, other communities have Nakamoto coefficient. They

• 45:17Ryan Sean Adams?

  scored very highly on that. So they're like, this is what decentralization actually means.

• 45:21David Hoffman?

  The worst thing about the Nakamoto coefficient is you can measure it in an interpretable way. It itself is not objective. It's not an objective system.

• 45:28Ryan Sean Adams?

  And we will never come up with an objective measurement of decentralization. That's perfect. So my take is similar to yours, David, we should just stop trying. Let's, we are beyond that again. We are beyond the narratives of what decentralization actually is. And now we're getting to fundamentals. Here's a fundamental. You brought it up. If you deploy something like tornado cash to your chain, some sort of privacy tech, and the smart contracts themselves are sanctioned by the most powerful government in the world. That is, the United States government says, no, these smart contracts are illegal. Can the network still process that transaction? That's the question. Okay. This is the case for tornado cash on Ethereum. There are a list

• 46:11Ryan Sean Adams?

  of addresses, smart contract addresses, and actual wallets that are blacklisted by OFAC.

• 46:20Ryan Sean Adams?

  Can those transactions still go through? On Ethereum, the answer is yes.

• 46:23David Hoffman?

  Yes, unequivocally, yes.

• 46:25Ryan Sean Adams?

  Here's an entire website that's a watchdog for this. It's called MEVwatch. Not only can they go through, but actually OFAC compliant blocks have gone down over time. Okay. And like, there's a whole story here that we could get into. But the reality is Ethereum has now passed an acid test right now for coercion. Okay. Because why, why do we even have decentralization? So that we can resist corruption and coercion. This is coercion. A major government says, you cannot process the transaction. The Ethereum network processes it anyway.

• 46:58David Hoffman?

  Ethereum network doesn't give a fuck.

• 47:00Ryan Sean Adams?

  The decentralization test is passed. Okay. Thought experiment. If you had some sort of tornado cash, smart contract, OFAC sanctioned addresses on your chain, will the transaction still go through? Ethereum is really the only chain that's gone through that. Bitcoin really ha- I mean Bitcoin has also passed that test, but it doesn't have DeFi. So it's just like sending to you a Bitcoin address. It also process like passes that check. But if the miners start to censor, David.

• 47:31David Hoffman?

  Right.

• 47:31Ryan Sean Adams?

  That's where you get into, oh, it's not passing the test here.

• 47:34David Hoffman?

  Right.

• 47:35Ryan Sean Adams?

  Solana and Avalanche and many other networks have not gone through this, but that's something you can test.

• 47:41David Hoffman?

  By the way, being tested is bullish. Cause if you are being tested by nation states, it means you are threatening to nation states.

• 47:49Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yes.

• 47:49David Hoffman?

  And the TAM of a nation state is under duress by that nation state. Right. It means that Ethereum is now pushing up against something as large as the United States. And the United States is saying, I don't like this, stop it. And Ethereum is like, well, the United States nodes will stop it, but I'm going to continue going.

• 48:07Ryan Sean Adams?

  Why? Cause it's a protocol like TCP IP. Does it get, does it decide? I mean, no, because it's a decentralized protocol, right? That's what, that's what your network should be. And by the way, if this ever becomes not the case, Ethereum is unable to process an OFAC sanctioned transaction. Okay. Then you'll know it's not decentralized. And these acid tests apply equally across all chains. And I think there's a, an acid test for how much MEV is being extracted by centralized parties in the future. We can start to measure those things.

• 48:36David Hoffman?

  MEV is a parameter for measuring the centralization of the blockchain supply chain.

• 48:41Ryan Sean Adams?

  I think we can start to measure what's the uptime of your chain. Right. Because that has to do with censorship. If a nation state can just disrupt, you know, your chain and throw it offline.

• 48:51David Hoffman?

  Solana is approaching one year of 100% uptime. In February, it will cross its one year mark. Congratulations, almost.

• 48:59Ryan Sean Adams?

  In February, it was down for 18 hours. I'm just saying like, okay. And then, you know, last year, I mean, they're getting better. It's whatever. It's, I guess, you know, we're chewing glass and stuff, but.

• 49:08David Hoffman?

  It's getting better, but in an environment, Ryan, that is not antagonistic. Because Solana has not run up against as large of a power of the United States as America. And so when it does run into that test, Solana is currently in a imagination environment. Whereas it has not been faced with a reality environment. If something like tornado cash got deployed on Solana, it might invoke the ire of the nation state, and that would be a real test. But right now, we are in the joyous la la land of no reality, only narrative.

• 49:39Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yes.

• 49:40David Hoffman?

  Everything's sunny, everything's just like, you know, it's a sunny field of meadows of low transaction fees. Everything's great.

• 49:45Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yes, and the proof will be not in the religious word of decentralization. However, we define that the the the proof will be, are we able to pass these acid tests? And by the way, it's not a given that Ethereum will be able to pass these either. It's really freaking hard to do this.

• 49:59David Hoffman?

  It's really hard. Yeah, well, I mean, like, look at the the increasing of OFAC compliant blocks at the very beginning. Yeah. Before Ethereum took this problem extremely seriously. It was at eighty five to ninety percent like OFAC censorship.

• 50:14Ryan Sean Adams?

  Now, now, that still means your transaction goes through. By the way, as long as you have any green, it just takes longer. But getting this down to like, what are we down to like?

• 50:23David Hoffman?

  We're down to like thirty three percent. So what does that mean? That means like if you process a tornado cash transaction, there's a thirty three percent chance that your transactions get censored in the next block. And then there's a thirty three percent chance that it gets censored in the next block after that. And so like, you know, in enough blocks and, and, you know, thirty three percent, you know, one third chance, you're going to get that transaction verified pretty damn soon, within a minute. And when it was somewhere at like eighty five percent, you might be waiting up to like five minutes. But it always goes through and eventually, and we like that number to be sooner rather than later.

• 50:55Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yep, and by the way, if all of these kind of collapsed and we fail on any of our chains to pass these, these decentralization acid tests, then guess what, David? I think we've recreated TradFi. And we may as well.

• 51:09David Hoffman?

  There's less money in that world.

• 51:10Ryan Sean Adams?

  Yeah, and we may as well be very bullish on these more, you know, like. Centralized, I guess, systems. There we go. That was a lot of takes.

• 51:20David Hoffman?

  Yeah, I think part of this, just to frame where we are in this cycle and why this conversation is happening is because we are in the midst of a changing of the seasons. This is a tweet that I liked from Chris Bernisky, who goes, "As a long-term investor, be loud in the bear and quiet in the bull." And I followed up and said, "I know a Chris changing of the seasons tweet when I see one." This is Chris saying, "Hey, like, I've been loud in the bear market." He was very loud about calling the bottom right after FTX collapsed. Congrats, Chris. Like, great call. He's very loud about the growth of Solana over the next year. Also, that has painted numbers for him in the market. And now, I think he's kind of giving us a wave goodbye. It's like, okay, that was the bear market. I want to be quiet now because it's the bull market.

• 52:05David Hoffman?

  And so, this is, to me, a changing of the seasons. And this is also why we have seen risk go down the market cap stack. And because we are seeing people try to price in the future. And so, to conclude the show, this is the last tweet that we'll read out here. I say, "In bull markets, fundamentals are bearish and narratives are bullish." And why is this true? Because fundamentals ground you in reality and narratives are all about what you can imagine the future to be. Hypothetical futures. And the world, the sky is the limit. Anything's possible until you're Cardano and you invoke smart contracts into the system.

• 52:43Ryan Sean Adams?

  They're also very fleeting, right? Narratives move from one place to another in like three-month cycles, right? Anyway, I will start to quiet down, I think, a little bit when ETH is more reasonably priced. At 2.2K, it is not reasonably priced, is hilariously undervalued from my perspective, at least in the bull market. Guys, this has been Bankless Takes. Thanks for staying with us. Got to end with this, of course. Risk and disclaimers. You know crypto is risky. You could definitely lose what you put in. Prices go up, they go down, but we are headed west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the Bankless journey. Thanks a lot.

• 53:16David Hoffman?

  And Ryan, we've gone on for about an hour in this episode. And I just did some little napkin math on my calculator here. In the hour that we've been recording, Ethereum has burned $440,000 and Solana has issued $450,000.

• 53:31David Hoffman?

  And that is where we will leave this episode.

• 53:41David Hoffman?

  Thank you.