S2E28: Dr. Mayim Bialik: Science, Skepticism and the Boundaries of Proof | Talk Tracks

In this episode of Talk Tracks, Ky Dickens sits down with neuroscientist, actor, and podcast host Dr. Mayim Bialik to explore the tension between science and skepticism. With a PhD in neuroscience and a career shaped by both scientific rigor and cultural storytelling, Mayim has explored the questions on the edge of scientific understanding and that which can’t be quantified. From near-death experiences and spontaneous healing to telepathy, savant abilities, and the limits of measurement, she reflects on where the scientific method holds and where it begins to fall short. As more people share experiences that don’t neatly fit into existing frameworks, this conversation asks: what counts as evidence? And is it possible to build a framework that allows both skepticism and wonder to coexist? Join The Telepathy Tapes Backstage Pass to get ad-free episodes, never-before-heard interviews, behind-the-scenes documentary footage, and access to our private Discord community. This is your invitation to come closer. To help shape what’s next. To be more than a listener… to be a co-creator of this paradigm shift. So if you’ve felt moved, if you’ve felt seen, if you’ve felt the call—subscribe today and join us: thetelepathytapes.supercast.com. http://thetelepathytapes.supercast.com/ -------------- Right now, Batch is offering 30% off sitewide — and yes, that applies to subscriptions too, so you can lock in that discount on your monthly supply. Go to hellobatch.com/TAPES http://hellobatch.com/TAPES and use code TAPES at checkout. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Ky Dickens?

  Hey everyone, I'm Kai Dickens and welcome back to The Talk Tracks. In this episode, we're sitting down with Mayim Bialik, someone that many of you may know from her decades-long career in television, from her roles in shows like Blossom to The Big Bang Theory, where she played a neuroscientist on TV. The incredible thing about Mayim is that in real life, she actually is one. Mayim holds a PhD in neuroscience from UCLA with a focus on psychoneuroendocrinology and obsessive-compulsive disorder. She is also the host of her own podcast, Mayim Bialik's Breakdown, where she explores the intersection between science and spirituality. This was a super fun conversation and Mayim and I have a lot in common, so I hope you enjoy it.

• 0:39Ky Dickens?

  Hi everyone, I'm Kai Dickens and I'm thrilled to welcome you to The Talk Tracks. In this series, we'll dive deeper into the revelations, challenges, and unexpected truths from The Telepathy Tapes. The goal is to explore all the threads that weave together our understanding of reality: science, spirituality, and yes, even unexplained things like psiabilities. If you haven't yet listened to The Telepathy Tapes, I encourage you to start there. It lays the foundation for everything we'll be exploring in this journey. We'll feature conversations with groundbreaking researchers, thinkers, non-speakers, and experiencers who illuminate the extraordinary connections that may defy explanation today but won't for long. If you want to see our incredible guests in person, we have a video version of this episode on The Telepathy Tapes YouTube page.

• 1:22Speaker 01

  Network freedom and flexibility, that's what you want in a healthcare plan. With a Humana Medicare Advantage PPO plan, you can see any doctor in the country who accepts Medicare, including specialists. No referrals, no kidding. Learn more at gethumana.com. See any doctor who accepts Medicare and is willing to bill Humana. Humana PPOs may not be available in all areas. Benefits and costs share may vary. Humana is a Medicare Advantage PPO organization with a Medicare contract. Enrollment in any Humana plan depends on contract renewal.

• 1:52Ky Dickens?

  I do always think it's good for people to get to introduce themselves because people know you often for your acting, or as a neuroscientist, or for your podcast. But how do you want people to think of you?

• 2:03Speaker 02

  Yeah, most people know me from my acting work. I was in Beaches, which a lot of people remember was one of my first kind of big things when I was young. And then I was on Blossom from the time I was 14 to 19. And then I left acting for 12 years. And I did my undergraduate in neuroscience and Hebrew and Jewish Studies at UCLA. And then I got my PhD also in neuroscience, also at UCLA. My specialty is psychoneuroendocrinology. I studied obsessive compulsive disorder. And I had two children around the time that I got my doctorate. I returned to acting after teaching neuroscience and Hebrew and piano. And I was on The Big Bang Theory for nine years, played neurobiologist. I was nominated for four Emmys. I've never won, but I feel like I might as well say that I was nominated.

• 2:47Ky Dickens?

  It's a deal.

• 2:48Speaker 02

  It's a big deal.

• 2:49Ky Dickens?

  Huge deal.

• 2:50Speaker 02

  And my fifth Emmy nomination was for co-hosting Jeopardy, which I was also very excited to do for two seasons. And I have my own podcast called Mindy Alex Breakdown. And I do that with my partner, Jonathan Cohen. And we talk about the intersection of science and spirituality. We talk about sort of science communication, specifically around mental health, and also alternative and holistic healing.

• 3:13Ky Dickens?

  I love it. And, you know, being a child actor, like, you probably had a weird school situation, I would imagine. At what point, were you always interested in science and neuroscientists? Or when did that become such a passion that you're like, I'm gonna leave everything and pursue it?

• 3:26Speaker 02

  Yeah, I'm a late bloomer to science. I actually, you know, was raised, I was born in 1975. And the sort of going notion for girls was that girls are not good at math or science, and boys are. And the boys frequently reminded all the girls of this. And so, yeah, I struggled. I didn't learn easily those subjects. I was fascinated with quantum mechanics. I was fascinated with physics. And I really liked marine biology. You know, I loved the mammals of the ocean. And I never thought that I'd be able to achieve it. And it wasn't until I was on Blossom, when I had different tutors for every subject, because my parents were both teachers and- They wanted me to have as as good an education while on a set as I could. It was the first time I had a female mentor.

• 4:08Speaker 02

  She was then an undergrad at UCLA and she answered an ad for like Hollywood teen needs a science tutor. It was literally posted on a bulletin board at UCLA and she was at that time, an undergrad, a dental student at UCLA. And it was the first time I had a one on one instructor for, you know, something science related. And I think having a female mentor and someone who had a really interesting path and journey helped me. It helped me get the confidence and the skill set, which you need both of those things. Sometimes you have the skill set, but not the confidence, or you can have the confidence, but not the skill set. I needed both. And so it wasn't until late in high school, like that's a late bloomer for science. And I even had to do some remedial work in college to catch up because I hadn't really been that dialed in to chemistry. Especially on a set, it was hard.

• 4:52Speaker 02

  But even so, there are many, many students who get to college and what you call us is doctor. The same way you call the top of the class doctor, but some of us do need a little extra help. And at the time affirmative action was in place at UCLA. And what it meant is that if you came into college needing some extra support, it may take you a couple more quarters, but you'll get there. And that's, that's what I did.

• 5:14Ky Dickens?

  Wow. Now, when you chose neuroscientists instead of marine biology, was there something you wanted to understand about the brain? Or like a case you came across?

• 5:23Speaker 02

  Yeah, at the time I was very interested in, you know, we called it nurture versus nature back then. Topics like homosexuality, topics like mental illness, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder. These were things that were already in the cultural conversation of is this, you know, genetics? Or is this environment? Back then you could ask that, you know, polar question. So I was originally interested in genetics. I wanted to go to med school. I wanted to be a psychiatrist. At that time, that was the only way that you could get at mental health. Like it never occurred to me to like be a therapist. Like it was such a rare thing that I figured like, I want to go to med school. I want to become a psychiatrist. I did not have the grades to go to med school is the truth. And when I, one of my introductory courses was we learned about the brain and nervous system.

• 6:09Speaker 02

  And when I learned about the electrophysiology of the neuron, that specific. was the moment I fell in love. Um, all that action potential refractory period, like all that stuff, sodium potassium pump. That really was like, this is the level that I want to understand. And also, as you well know, neuroscience is, it's the science of how we perceive. It's the science of how we communicate. It's the practical, you know, molecular and cellular science of how, you know, the sodium potassium pump works, for example, and how medications work. But also it is the science of neuropsychology. It's the science of perception and misperception. So that was really the level that I wanted to study. And, um, yeah, I registered for an email address. I was [email protected]. Back when it wasn't cool to be a nerd.

• 6:52Speaker 02

  And yeah, that was what I embarked on as my field of study. And as a, I'm a vegan person, so I always knew I wanted to work with humans rather than animals. And so I ended up working in the field of, um, it's called mental retardation. That's the, the clinical, you know, kind of category. And I in particular studied Prader-Willi syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder. So that was my specialization for my thesis.

• 7:14Ky Dickens?

  So you've obviously started a podcast. And when you decided to do that, what were you trying to explore exactly?

• 7:21Speaker 02

  Yeah. So when our podcast first started, you know, keep in mind, not everyone and their mother had a podcast. You know, we're some 360 episodes in now, like we're, we're years into something that when we started it, I had never even heard a podcast. Like, I didn't even know what it was that we were doing. But I had wanted to, you know, from a science communicator perspective, start talking about things that many people who are not, you know, either able or have having access to a therapist, right? There are things that I think is a human right for people to know about, to know the difference between anxiety and depression, to know the difference between an anxiety attack and a panic attack. To me, I just feel like it's a human right for us to be educated about mental health.

• 8:02Speaker 02

  And I thought, you know, I go to therapy and I have all these things that I've gathered, you know, that my therapist has supported me with, like, There are certain things that should be just, you know, common knowledge. And we started this and then COVID hit. And it still seemed relevant, but it took on a different flavor because we had so many people experiencing anticipatory anxiety, right? People who were having their sleep disrupted. They didn't know why they were feeling gross all the time and why they were overeating or not eating. And we thought, gosh, how many people are experiencing a global pandemic with no skills? And so the fast track way to communicate this was not through a TV show, it was through a podcast. And so that's where we started with really trying to help people break down, um, basic

• 8:47Speaker 02

  mental health challenges and also to try and have people relate to either celebrities or experts, you know, about kind of the basics of mental health. And what we discovered was that almost every single guest we had on, whether it was a celebrity, a corporate person, you know, a professional, they all kept circling around the same thing, which is having a relationship with something greater than you is a source of strength. It's a source of recovery. It's a source of comfort and can also be a portal to understanding things outside of our current understanding. And we kind of felt like, oh, this is a bit of a pivot, I don't know if it's a pivot and evolution of understanding mental health in terms of physical health and spiritual health as well.

• 9:31Ky Dickens?

  I love that because I've never heard what made your pivot. Because, I mean, the first like iteration of your show was so necessary and beautiful and helpful. And I love that this is like what it evolved into because of that need.

• 9:42Speaker 02

  Correct.

• 9:43Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 9:43Speaker 02

  Well, and also, we couldn't deny that whether someone believed in God or didn't believe in God, they kept saying, but what keeps me healthy is knowing that I'm not in charge of the universe. Knowing that I can take my hands off it. And we thought, gosh, these are all the same things that mystics have talked about. These, you know, and even when we got into physical health, right? This notion of like, oh, you can create an environment in your body that facilitates healing. What? That's not how you and I were raised. We were raised that like, oh, your body does this and it'll get sick and here's the medicine to make it better. And then your brain and your mind do this other thing, you know? Instead of, oh, when you get a stomach ache because you're nervous, that's the mind and body telling you they're connected.

• 10:25Ky Dickens?

  Yes.

• 10:25Speaker 02

  That's the mind body connection.

• 10:27Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. You've now talked to a lot of thinkers, a lot of scientists, a lot of just average, you know, people. What do you think is missing about our current understanding, our own consciousness?

• 10:38Speaker 02

  I mean, I think that a lot of people don't understand how much is in their control in terms of their own state of being. You know, I think that there's still a lot that we don't know. And that can make people feel uncomfortable about consciousness with a capital C. You know, about a sort of larger plane. I think that what a lot of people don't understand also is that it's okay for us to be curious about the science. Just like it's okay for us to be curious about the parts that maybe science can't explain.

• 11:12Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 11:13Speaker 02

  We don't have to reject one or the other. And I think the real sweet spot of consciousness is respecting both of those. And I would even say respecting them equally, right?

• 11:25Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 11:26Speaker 02

  And not sort of playing who's more important here.

• 11:29Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 11:29Speaker 02

  Right? The feelers or the scientists?

• 11:31Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 11:32Speaker 02

  And some of the people, I think, in this field that are really making headway are people who are not afraid to say, I don't know.

• 11:40Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 11:40Speaker 02

  And if I don't know, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

• 11:42Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 11:43Speaker 02

  But I think we get into trouble when we have this kind of dualist, you know,

• 11:46Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 11:46Speaker 02

  I think very pessimistic and frankly, cold, you know, perspective that if it doesn't have a number and it doesn't have an assay, it doesn't exist.

• 11:55Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 11:56Speaker 02

  That's not true. We don't know what is true, but we know what's not true.

• 12:00Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. I mean, but it does sound like this has been tethering around like your own quest for a little bit and mine is this idea that the non-physical world shouldn't be ignored and there's a place for it in science. I mean, would you agree with that? And if so, why?

• 12:13Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think that the strongest, it's not even evidence, but like the strongest proof of that is how much we didn't know when we didn't have the instruments to record it. So even the notion that bacteria can cause infections, right? If you go back historically, it's not to make a direct comparison. It's to show that the paradigm

• 12:34Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 12:35Speaker 02

  that we are sitting in inevitably will shift as technology increases and as our hearts increase and as that sort of... sort of capacity to expand the conversation also increases. But to say, you know, microwaves don't work because I can't see the microwaves. Well, we know that that's not true and they work and they will heat your food or whatever else they do. The same, I think, is true at some level of what we call energy, right? And the notion that some people have very elaborate explanations for energy bodies and things that I don't necessarily understand. You know, that, I think, will start being better elucidated.

• 13:18Speaker 02

  Not only as our technology advances, but I think as our minds start expanding to include some of those things in the conversation. And I was talking to you before we started, I started watching Seinfeld again with my son. And, you know, there was an episode about, very early on, about one of them going to a healer. And all of these things that were so crazy. And most of the things this healer did, you could literally read about in the New York Times today. You know, things that, you know, were seen as so fringe and so out there. So we are evolving in terms of how we understand many things that were previously dismissed as holistic, kooky, out there. You know, even the notion that Gabor Maté, you know, and Vanderkot, you know, talked about

• 14:00Speaker 02

  that trauma impacts the physiology and that that is something that we can see. We can see it passed on epigenetically, we can see it passed on through generations. This is something that sounds like it's out of a Star Trek episode, you know? And the fact is, there is science to it, we can quantify it. Is it as easy to quantify as how much caffeine is in a cup of tea? No, but most things worth experiencing are not easily quantifiable.

• 14:27Ky Dickens?

  Yes, 100%. I think it's Rupert Sheldrake who has that quote, and I think it's so great, where it's like, if you were to ask why music is special.

• 14:34Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 14:34Ky Dickens?

  And it's like, okay, you could like pull apart a violin and be like, here's the splinters. Like, this will tell us. Oh, no, that's not it. We're not getting the answer. It's like, let's look at the ink on the, oh, there's black dots on white paper. Like, well, this tells us why music is special. And like, sometimes over quantifying and measuring is not.

• 14:48Speaker 02

  I mean, yeah, you can see it in, in love and relationships as well. You know, if you look at someone that you love, there may be reasons why you find them beautiful. Does that mean they're objectively beautiful? No.

• 15:03Ky Dickens?

  You know those pieces in your closet that you find yourself reaching for over and over again? Those are the pieces that earn a permanent place in your wardrobe. And that's exactly what Quince does so well. Quince makes elevated, everyday essentials using premium materials like Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and premium stretch denim. The designs are timeless, thoughtfully crafted, and made to be worn again and again. Their 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters start at just $50, giving you the softness and quality you'd expect from a luxury brand without the luxury price tag. And as the weather gets colder, Quince has everything you need to round out your wardrobe, from warm, responsibly sourced down jackets and cozy cashmere scarves and gloves, to beautiful 14-karat gold jewelry that adds the perfect finishing touch. I actually recently discovered their jewelry, and I love the 14-karat gold station bead choker.

• 15:48Ky Dickens?

  I wear it with everything. It can be dressed up, it can be dressed down, it can be layered with other necklaces. I love it. And you'll see it in a lot of our video podcasts. Find the fall pieces you'll reach for most at Quince. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers, or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was the Telepathy Tapes. It's the best way to support our show.

• 16:23Speaker 02

  That's the point of sort of the conglomeration of things. It's the elephant, you know? It's if you have a bunch of, you know, people analyzing different parts of an elephant, they could each have a decision about what this creature is based on the small region they're looking at. It's only when we see the geschalt, you know, when we see it in its entirety, that we say, this has meaning, or this has meaning to me, which is not always the same thing.

• 16:45Ky Dickens?

  So, we've been talking on our show a lot about like consciousness, is it something that we, our mind creates, or is it something we tap into, or is it both? Like, do you have, do you fall, where do you fall on that?

• 16:56Speaker 02

  I don't know that I definitively have a vote. I think that there's a lot of attraction that I have to this notion that consciousness creates us and that there's something before us, which, you know, I think is also kind of a mystical and religious concept. I'm one of these people, especially in who I get to talk to on my podcast, that, you know, we speak to a lot of people who are experts in very specific perspectives. And there are certain things where I definitely feel like, that's not me. Like, when Steven Pinker came on, I definitely felt, that's not me. I don't have that. But a lot of times, especially with consciousness, you know, we'll speak to astrophysicists, we'll speak to psychologists, we'll speak to healers, we'll speak to channelers.

• 17:39Speaker 02

  And many different aspects of an explanation of consciousness at any given time can make sense, but I do, you know, have a personal notion that I don't need to wonder what came before the Big Bang. It's an unknowable wisdom. And I believe that's sort of the, you know, some sort of primal consciousness, I guess, that creates and created everything that we experience.

• 18:04Ky Dickens?

  So, when Steven Pinker was in, like, what were the things that were, where you're like, ah, that doesn't resonate with me exactly? Which I think is okay, like, people have all sorts of issues, you know?

• 18:12Speaker 02

  Totally. Well, I mean, I think there's something about, and, you know, I feel so bad picking on Steven Pinker, but I'm sure he'll be fine. I think also, he thinks we might be distantly related, so, you know, it also feels like a familial fight. You know, I think there's, there's a notion that, there's something very unscientific to me about anyone making a decision about something that we don't have all the information about.

• 18:36Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 18:36Speaker 02

  Meaning, as a scientist, my job is to be skeptical and to form independent and isolated hypotheses that I can test, or that we, you know, as a scientific public, can test and verify, compare with other experts and scientists, and draw conclusions. But to say, that sounds delusional, therefore it's wrong, it's a non-scientific perspective. And I think, you know, and I kind of said this to Steven Pinker, you know, I said, that it feels like he's more fanatical about there not being a God than I am about there being one. And to me, that's something that even when we talk about things like you have,

• 19:19Speaker 02

  you know, introduced and continue to explore with your work. Yeah, the scientific approach is to get more information, to understand it from all angles, and to understand it in a sociocultural context.

• 19:35Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 19:35Speaker 02

  And not simply say, because this is not what color is it by wavelength, that we can understand it. And like I said, some of the best things worth understanding cannot be explained in the way that many dualists would like to explain things.

• 19:52Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, I think that's a really interesting point because, you know, I've had come across a lot of really respectable scientists or thinkers that are so fundamental almost and dogmatic in their belief that it almost feels like a closed-minded believer. It's like you're coming from the same place as someone who might like believe wholeheartedly that the earth is flat that you're gonna tease, you know? Like, there has to be openings for.

• 20:15Speaker 02

  Sure, and I also, you know, I feel like it feels like I'm engaging in a seventh grade argument when I say like, well, we used to think that we were the center of the universe, right? But I think people very quickly forget. And I think people want to believe that we're much more evolved than we are. People want to believe, well, since we have, you know, cell phones and computers and AI and all the other amazing things that there are, there's no way that we could not understand something. Or there's no way that I don't have the answer to what's happening here. And I think that's what makes a lot of people feel comfortable. And look, I'll be honest, the world feels a little bit scary in a lot of ways. The country feels a little bit lot scary. And people don't like uncertainty.

• 21:00Speaker 02

  People don't like questions. They just don't. And I think that's what shakes a lot of people up. It really does, and they want to close the door.

• 21:09Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, you know, we've been talking a little bit about like how to measure things and things that can't be measured. And is there space, and maybe you could like break this down as someone who's gone through scientific, you know, training. You know, because I think so often we're like, oh, it can only be proven if you can measure it and put it in a lab. But there's also things that we know of by like going into an environment. Like Jane Goodall went and spent time like in the jungle to really be part of a community of animals to understand. Or like we understood that X-rays might cause cancer, not by putting people in a lab and putting X-rays on them, by being like, okay. And I think about that in terms of anecdotal evidence.

• 21:45Speaker 02

  Right.

• 21:45Ky Dickens?

  I mean, we accept it sometimes.

• 21:47Speaker 02

  Right.

• 21:48Ky Dickens?

  But we don't in other occasions. And I wonder, is there any vernacular for that in science? I think of all these parents of non-speakers and teachers, like thousands at this point, who are like, "This has been my experience." Like, at what point is something weighted enough to be like?

• 22:02Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think, I mean, I think it's a good question. In terms of scientific method, I do think that anecdotal experience is exactly that. It's anecdotal experience, and by its nature, it's variable. And I think that is what butts up so strongly against scientific method, right? Variability. And if we're studying variability and we see that things are falling on a really nice bell curve, like, we know what to do with that. And we know how to say, "This is two standard deviations outside." But when it comes to the kind of human experience that we're talking about with anecdotal reports, the problem, and it's a lowercase p problem, but the problem is, it cannot and will not and does not want to stand up to the kind of lack of variability

• 22:47Speaker 02

  that would be required for things like the scientific method. Now, I think your question, though, is more precise and significant. At what point do we weight something? At what point does it carry more weight? Yeah, I think we're there. I think we're there, and I think even having this part of a larger conversation puts us there. But, you know, I'll be honest, even as a layperson, which, you know, I'm not an expert on anything that your work has introduced me to, I'm very saddened at how many scientists in particular will not engage. That saddens me, because I think that there is something to being open, to trying to find ways, right, to quantify.

• 23:31Speaker 02

  But, as I've learned from what you've taught me, right, the very nature of the observation of this kind of ability, access, being.

• 23:40Speaker 02

  Does not always lend itself to observation.

• 23:43Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 23:43Speaker 02

  In the ways that we want it to, in which case I don't think it should be dismissed. I don't think it should be thrown out, but I think we also get to see like, how do we keep it in its appropriate box? So that, and I think this is what you're trying to do, right? So that it is open to an inquiry that would hopefully give it the kind of weight that it deserves.

• 24:05Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. You know, it's interesting. So one of the men who actually invested in our documentary film, and he's invested in a lot of consciousness studies. And he's doing such good work at like helping find answers. And every once in a while he'll send me an email and he's just was really high up in the tech world and all that stuff. And he sent me some conclusions he's made recently. And he was like, I think that psi abilities, and for anyone just jumping in for the first time, it's like ESP abilities, right? Are shy and don't maybe want to be captured.

• 24:31Speaker 02

  Sweet.

• 24:33Ky Dickens?

  And like, they might be really excited at first and then kind of go in. And we, again, there might be a reason why eventually we might understand that. But like, is there, could it be the type of thing where, you know, it's not like shooting baskets over and over? Or maybe you can compare it like that. Like maybe you're really good at free throws and then when people come and watch.

• 24:49Speaker 02

  Look, I think, I don't know that I would anthropomorphize it and make it shy. But I think what is true is that, again, I think it comes down to variability. That the environment and the conditions in which we can understand psi abilities, I think are very sensitive. And I think they're sensitive in ways that we don't entirely understand. And they're sensitive in ways that a lot of hard scientists don't believe in, which is not helpful. It's the equivalent of, you know, if you're the kind of parent who says to your child, you shouldn't be feeling that, stop feeling it. That's one way to approach it. The other way would be, I see that you're feeling something. I may not understand it, but I see that it's significant to you. Therefore, it exists.

• 25:33Speaker 02

  It feels like that's kind of the difference. And that's why I say that some of this dualist and sort of hard science perspective, which is very dismissive of psi phenomenon, for example. It feels loveless. It doesn't feel like there's heart to it. And I think there always has been heart to science. I mean, even my own, you know, I have a seventeen and twenty year old who exists to always tell me that I'm wrong. You know, even they will sort of say, well, where does love, you know, what's love got to do with it, right? And the fact is, there is an openness and a creativity to science. Quantum mechanics, all of those physicists knew there's something going on outside of our realm of calculation. Does that mean that everyone who believes in God should become a physicist? No. Does it mean that all physicists need to believe in God?

• 26:17Speaker 02

  Absolutely not. But the notion that you can separate the heart, right? Or a spiritual component from science, it's never been true, and I don't think that's a sign of our evolution.

• 26:28Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. And then I wonder if you've seen any patterns, just in the guests you've talked to. When, when people talk about something like remote viewing, or like, in this case, like telepathy, or some other, maybe sighability, or even the UAP phenomenon. I mean, have there been things that keep coming up over and over where you're like, there is overlap in these strange anomalous phenomena?

• 26:47Speaker 02

  Do you mean in like, sort of like their practicality, or in how we analyze them, or?

• 26:50Ky Dickens?

  Well, okay, so for instance, for me, one thing that constantly is fascinating is how truly believing that someone can do it makes a big difference. Makes a huge difference. Or Julia Mossbridge, Dr. Julia Mossbridge would say, love is always fundamental. And then when she's tested precognition, she'll ask, do you love yourself? Do you love your day so far? Do you love the device you're doing this on? The more people say yes to those love questions, the better they do.

• 27:12Speaker 02

  Okay, so yeah, that's a great example. This notion of love as a universal, or, you know, kind of common denominator, which, you know, for anyone who's had a psychedelic experience, a transcendental experience, there's this like, feeling of being like suffused with like, love. And those are the states that people like Joe Dispenza, and Tony Robbins, and Bruce Lipton, and any manifester, or healer, is telling you. Resonate that feeling of love. Can you make it spread? Neural retraining programs use that. Any good somatic healer will use that, right? So this notion of love, that is something for sure, that is kind of a common thread. I think one of the other things that, from a science perspective also, interests me

• 27:51Speaker 02

  is the notion of, not just meditation, but what does it mean to regulate a nervous system? Which we talk about a lot, for trauma, for healing, all these things. What does it mean, though, in terms of access to sci phenomenon? And so even, you know, I remember this was one of my most favorite, you know, parts of telepathy tapes. When teachers or therapists would say that they were communing somehow, right? With their nonverbal, you know, students. The notion was they're not just like walking to the fridge and getting a bottle of water and getting information beamed into them. They are dropping in. They're dropping into some space that is quiet.

• 28:32Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 28:33Speaker 02

  That is peaceful.

• 28:34Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 28:34Speaker 02

  That is calm and that is receptive. And who hasn't learned, right? That that's a place to drop into when you want to improve immune function? When you want to pray for your highest good or that of someone else? This place of dropping in and regulation is exactly what any doctor will tell you. To improve vagal function, to tone your sympathetic nervous system, to teach your body to self-regulate so that you are not in fight or flight, but you're in rest and restore, right?

• 29:06Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 29:07Speaker 02

  That's the place that something seems to be happening. And that's something Jonathan, my co-host and I, we kept picking up on. And you'll pick up on it if someone's doing TM, you know, transcendental meditation. You'll pick up on it if someone is talking about psychedelics. And you'll pick up on it in these healing spaces when we're trying to heal from trauma, even rehabbing a part of our body. It needs a state of calm to be able to do that from.

• 29:30Ky Dickens?

  I love, by the way, that you said that because I do think that is such a thing. And, you know, so many more parents now is like, it's going on and snowballing and stuff are saying it's not really telepathy the way you think about it, it's joining in the same field.

• 29:42Speaker 02

  Correct. Well, and I think that also the word telepathy freaks a lot of people out, right? Which, you know, with all due respect, I think it's a great name for the podcast. But yeah, I think that those are the ways that we can start getting into some of these fields to say, let's remove the word telepathy. What is it about when a healer is tapping into their client?

• 30:14Speaker 02

  We've all had that experience if we've ever worked with someone who does Reiki or any of these things, even acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine. And as you said, what the practitioner believes can impact the outcome. And some very, very early research into these fields discovered this. If the doctor believed, right, in the methods that they were using, there's a different outcome than if they don't. Like, what, how, what is that? How do we measure it? And the other thing that is also a constant, and it gets a bad rap, the notion of a placebo effect. The notion, right, the notion of placebo and ncebo, right?

• 30:53Speaker 02

  The idea that the mind is the most powerful medicine cabinet that we have shows us that there is a power in intention, intentionality. And something that, you know, we think of attention like, oh, am I paying attention? Or I have ADHD, I have a hard time paying attention. In kind of neuroscience terms, attention is where your nervous system is oriented and what value it gives to that information. And guess what? Just like some people are good artists and other people are good at math and some people are really good pianists and other people are good at sports, some people are better at tuning in to this frequency.

• 31:35Speaker 02

  And for those of us who can't do it naturally, we don't know how to tune into it. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That would be like me saying, oh, you are a good long-distance runner. I'm not, so it doesn't exist, right? Like, it doesn't even compute. But when it comes to these kind of phenomena, like when Julia Mossbridge sits with me and Jonathan and she's picking up on things, I'm like, where is she pulling this from? How does she know things that we are not verbalizing? And I'm not just saying like, oh, she can tell we like each other. I'm talking about deeper issues of how people function. Some people are better at that. Why shouldn't I believe then that some people are better at tapping in? And of course, people who are teachers, you know, healers,

• 32:16Speaker 02

  those people are leaning into those fields, possibly because they can sense things that other people can't.

• 32:22Ky Dickens?

  Right, or you're drawn like to be a caregiver for some reason.

• 32:25Speaker 02

  Correct, a hundred percent.

• 32:26Ky Dickens?

  Might be more open to.

• 32:27Speaker 02

  Absolutely. Why? I mean, and it's it's a rare exception that you meet a pediatrician who's like, I really fucking hate kids. I'm just so good at, you know, figuring out what's wrong with them. Or a vet who says like, God, if I have to look at another pet, I just know what's wrong with them. No, they're people who are intuitive. They're better at that than other people. And I'm better at other things than other people, but that doesn't mean that if they don't experience it, it doesn't exist.

• 32:52Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, I love that. And the other thing that you just said that, you know, I've been starting to interview some non-speakers that are coming in. And often we have to send them the questions in advance to give them time to start answering. And one young man.

• 33:01Speaker 02

  That's what you did with me.

• 33:02Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, right, exactly. One young man sent me questions, answers this morning where one of the questions like about love. And his relationship with his girlfriend, who's also a non-speaker. And he said, you know, I feel like I can love in the purest form because it's more about presence than performance. And I thought that was so interesting, you know, he's just about feeling, not talking. We don't need to talk and name it, it's just feeling each other being there. And I was like, that is so true, like, because I think the closest I've often felt intuitively to my kids was when they were babies. And I just knew what they needed.

• 33:34Speaker 02

  Sure.

• 33:34Ky Dickens?

  Now my eleven year old, I was like, you just don't want to look at me, you know what I mean?

• 33:38Speaker 02

  Well, and I think also when you think about, you know, moments of connection, even as adults with other adults. Try not speaking to someone and see the feelings that come up when you do that. If you've ever been told like it is an exercise, stare into someone's eyes for three minutes. You will feel like your insides need to be taken out with a fish hook. It is so uncomfortable. But there are people who are more comfortable in those spaces. Again, I'm thinking of healers. I work with a somatic therapist and a lot of the session is her looking at me. And me being like, this is awkward. And she always will pull something out. And what it is, is that there are non-verbal spaces where people of different varieties

• 34:21Speaker 02

  have an understanding, a connection point.

• 34:26Speaker 02

  Those should not be dismissed, simply because not all of us can access them.

• 34:30Ky Dickens?

  And that was actually, we've, I was just looking at my questions and you answered the next one, which was like, are there certain characteristics of personhood that might make people more adept to.

• 34:39Speaker 02

  Totally.

• 34:39Ky Dickens?

  Sight abilities.

• 34:40Speaker 02

  Oh, I mean, this is something, this is another common theme that we've seen. People who have experienced trauma, people who have experienced hardship.

• 34:50Speaker 02

  People who have experienced abuse are often forced to acquire an ability to dissociate, to, I don't want to say rationalize, but to understand many sides of complicated situations. Those people often find themselves as the people who are super feelers. I think of Elizabeth Krone, who was struck by lightning as a young woman in 1988, and she left her body, watched the entire proceedings of what they did with her body, where they took it, what they said to her. She dropped back into her body, and in her book, she reveals that experiences of abuse as a child taught her to dissociate and watch her body.

• 35:34Speaker 02

  And she said, "I believe that that was the universe giving me the opportunity to learn how to step out of my consciousness." Right? Wow, and what does that mean? But that is something that many people report. "I'm a wounded healer," right? "I feel things that other people feel in a way that I cannot distinguish it from me and others." And you'll see this also with a lot of kids on the spectrum, various places on the spectrum. Learning to distinguish between what is your pain and someone else's, or even your joy and someone else's, that's something that many kids need to learn. And until it's taught, it feels very confusing. It's very dysregulating to the nervous system.

• 36:16Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, 100%. You know, I love that you brought this up, because it is fascinating, where, you know, I've talked to victims of abuse, mostly women, who will say, "That's what turned on," their gift of being able to astral travel, or what, you know, as a means of survival, and I think of often dissociation, like you said, like, leaving your body can be really helpful in those moments. Interestingly, I've talked to a few men, also victims of abuse, but often more physical abuse from fathers and such, who said they have a heightened sciability that turned on, whether it be remote viewing, because they said it was like a spidey sense. "Is it gonna happen if I go home right now?"

• 36:46Speaker 02

  Vigilance, yeah.

• 36:47Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, like, are they in a bad mood or good mood? If I go home, I'll be safe.

• 36:50Speaker 02

  Correct. So, yeah, what you're talking about is similar, I would argue, you know, neurologically speaking, similar to a response from trauma, in that the nervous system has ramped ...up its ability to monitor and scan. So you're constantly scanning and it looks different. It's going to look different depending on the circumstances. But that makes sense to me that someone who is more in tune to scanning, right? To that kind of awareness, they may not even be able to name it, but they can have this ability to be more open, for lack of a better word.

• 37:22Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, a hundred percent. And, you know, you brought up the woman who was struck by lightning. And we spent a lot of time looking into near-death experiences in season two.

• 37:29Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 37:30Ky Dickens?

  And, you know, I'm curious, I'm sure you've come across quite a few.

• 37:34Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 37:36Ky Dickens?

  And, I mean, to me, I feel like that's like a bridge, like a loophole. It's often the easiest thing for people to start to believe in, sometimes not.

• 37:43Speaker 02

  Yep.

• 37:44Ky Dickens?

  But have you heard of one that you feel like is harder to explain away?

• 37:48Speaker 02

  Oh, yeah.

• 37:48Ky Dickens?

  As a neuroscientist, or a few?

• 37:49Speaker 02

  For sure.

• 37:50Ky Dickens?

  And what might be those things?

• 37:51Speaker 02

  So the thing about NDEs is it really is one of the most studied set of anecdotal reports across the world. And, you know, the Department of Perceptual Studies at Virginia and, you know, the work of Jeffrey Long and Jim Tucker and Bruce Grayson, you know, they put this on the map as legitimate psychiatrists, M.D.s, who decided to say, we cannot ignore what is happening, even if it's anecdotal reports, right? The notion of NDEs, though, I think should be one of the places we can have the most conversation with, quote, "nonbelievers."

• 38:32Speaker 02

  Many are still very, very resistant, speaking about the people in my home primarily. But I think that one of the things about NDEs that shows that kind of anything is possible, it's Anita Morjani's experience. And this was a woman who went into full organ failure. She was in a hospital. She had, you know, terminal stage four cancer. She had tumors visible through her neck and chest. She experienced a coma as a result of this organ failure, but she was in there. The whole time, she had an experience where she was presented with a set of information about how she got cancer and how she would heal from cancer.

• 39:15Speaker 02

  And you might say, this is a lovely bedtime story, Mayim. Thank you and good night. What happened was, when she woke up from her coma, she said, I want you to stop all the treatments. And the doctors said, what are you talking about? You just basically died. And she said, I'm gonna get better. And they said, that's crazy. And I'll give you the long story short, her tumors started shrinking and she was discharged in two weeks.

• 39:38Ky Dickens?

  So wild.

• 39:40Speaker 02

  It's a case of legitimate, verified spontaneous healing that no one can explain. And her doctor has written extensively about this. But the notion being, everyone can be an exception, as Ellen Langer would talk about. Just because statistically, she should have died, there's always someone who doesn't die. However, that level of spontaneous remission and healing, it is inexplicable. But what is that information she shares in common with so many other NDE? I mean, with most of the NDE reports we hear, she shares a common journey.

• 40:18Ky Dickens?

  She's the season premiere of our TalkTrex season this year. So yeah, it's amazing.

• 40:23Speaker 02

  She's next level. It's literally, it's inexplicable.

• 40:26Ky Dickens?

  Well, and there are those NDEs with, you know, things you can validate, you know, once they leave the body and they're describing what was happening in the room next door.

• 40:33Speaker 02

  I mean, look, there's always gonna be people who are like, they must have had, there must have been an air conditioning tunnel that was funneling the information. Bruce Grayson, the reason he started studying NDEs as a psychiatrist, was a woman described to him from her bed where she was in a coma, what was happening in the cafeteria with him. I mean, he said, okay, this is my life now. This cannot be explained. I will spend my life studying it. And that's exactly what, you know, he and Jim Tucker and Jeffrey Long, you know, have done.

• 41:02Ky Dickens?

  Well, and it's interesting, too. I would love your thought on this, because I think I was talking to Dean Raden, just about like, how to capture like, an airtight 12th of the dust, you know, if it's possible. And he talked about the whole idea of like a purple unicorn. That like if you see a purple unicorn, one, you capture one purple unicorn. It's proof purple unicorns exist. There don't have to be petrillions.

• 41:23Speaker 02

  Correct. Horses don't eat meat, except if you see one horse eat a hot dog. Horses, some horses eat meat.

• 41:28Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. And so I thought that was so interesting, you know, because I think often it's like, oh, like, are all NDEs real or could it be this or whatever, but like.

• 41:37Speaker 02

  I think in that case, though, we have to be careful what we're trying to verify. Right? So like NDEs happen, yes. Can spontaneous healing happen? Absolutely. Can we use that to explain much of anything around it? Not necessarily, but when there's hoofbeats, it's usually horses. That's also true and science knows that to be true.

• 42:00Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 42:01Speaker 02

  However, it could be zebras.

• 42:05Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 42:05Speaker 02

  It could be someone who has generated the sound of hoofbeats using AI. Like, but it's usually horses.

• 42:14Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, right. Yeah, it's interesting. I just think it's, I mean, I think the whole way we study stuff and like where the burden of proof plays and all that stuff has become so fascinating to me.

• 42:23Speaker 02

  Absolutely.

• 42:24Ky Dickens?

  One thing that really was a mind bender in our season two as well, we talked about savant skills. And kind of this debate about whether or not they're latent in all of us. And something can happen, just turns them on. Like, we're all really good at math somewhere. We're all great. Or, or, or music, or is it something you tap into? And then there's savants like Derek Amato, I don't know if you know his story. He crashed his head into a pool, just a random accident. And then he started seeing like these shapes around his head. And each one carries like pockets of music. And he can like play by seeing them. And when he does so, it's like a symphony.

• 42:57Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 42:57Ky Dickens?

  I mean, what on earth?

• 42:59Speaker 02

  Yes. So, I mean, there's a couple of categories here that I think are important to speak about. You know, injury is the best way that neuroscience has to learn about anything, unfortunately. Injury, disease, tumors, wars, that's unfortunately where most of that, you know, kind of. phenomenal information comes from. And I'm by no means, you know, an expert, obviously. But I will say even from a layperson's, you know, perspective, there are a lot of inhibitory mechanisms that the brain has to utilize so that we can have this conversation. So the fact that I have clothing on my body is actually disturbing to my nervous system. But my brain has a way to quiet that down.

• 43:41Speaker 02

  So that for the most part, I can focus on this. If you've talked to someone who has the inability to filter that, their clothing will bother them to a significant extent. And there are things that we can do to condition them. But for the most part, the brain is constantly saying, not this, not this, not this, not this, so that we can do this. What we know, and in many cases it is from psychedelic experiences, transcendental experiences to some extent. But I'll go ahead and lean into some of the science behind psilocybin, behind some of the MDMA research, even the LSD research. We know that a lot of that inhibition, when you release it, there's a beauty in there. There is a consciousness expanding, not just like, ooh, this feels so good, which is more like pleasure principle.

• 44:26Speaker 02

  Yeah. But a deeper desire to connect with a larger consciousness is revealed. And in some people, they can access that without drugs. And it's really, really amazing. When you talk to someone like Michael Singer, who was kind of touched, right? Just literally in college, had a moment of like, oh, there's a voice in there. What?

• 44:55Speaker 02

  But in terms of other savant abilities, I do think that there's variability that is exceptional in certain brains. I'm an okay pianist, right? I don't believe with 10,000 hours, I will be anymore. I'll have more experience, but I'm not going to reach the level of Rachmaninoff. Like, I'm never going to be that. But I do think that there are certain brains that when there's a distribution of resources that usually would go towards, fill it in, speech, certain cognitive abilities, certain spatial abilities. I think that it does open up. Other pathways in ways that we also do not understand.

• 45:33Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 45:34Speaker 02

  I wish that I could be, you know, a concert pianist that way. But I think that certain brains are different. And there's enough lack of variability that we can all function. We can have this conversation. But looking at these special cases reveals a tremendous amount.

• 45:50Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 45:50Speaker 02

  And it's worthy of us leaning into that, of course.

• 45:54Ky Dickens?

  Well, I find, I mean, savant skills seem like such the best way, like such a concrete thing to study because science has embraced that they're real.

• 46:01Speaker 02

  Correct.

• 46:02Ky Dickens?

  But you cannot explain them exactly yet.

• 46:05Speaker 02

  Right, so I, one of the rotations I did as a graduate student was I was interested in studying perfect pitch. So this is one of those things that actually does have a genetic basis. It does run in families, but not in the same way that like brown eyes are going to be dominant. Right? It's a lot more complicated and elaborate than that. Also, is it about the environment? Where does that feed in? And so I think that's some of the complexity of studying these things. And it's very hard to find two savants with the same exact brain.

• 46:34Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 46:35Speaker 02

  Same exact set of interest and ability that we have in sort of being able to, again, kind of quantify that. So that's the variability that, again, makes it a little bit hard. And there's so many other things we have to control for. And that's the other thing, you know, from our conversation about like scientific method. We need to be able to rule out things that might be causing things, causation and correlation. Right? So, you know, when I studied obsessive compulsive disorder, I had to find a group of subjects who were really, really similar and also were not on too many medications that might be influencing the cortisol and oxytocin and vasopressin I'm looking at in their blood. So that's a lot of complexity of working with savants, working with people with special needs, working in savant communities or even autism communities. There's often a lot of comorbidities.

• 47:20Speaker 02

  There's often a lot of other things that need to be treated, medicated, regulated. Where do those, you know, fall into what a statistical analysis is going to require, which is that we can rule out these kind of, you know, outlying influences?

• 47:35Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. It's fascinating. I mean, I just think there's, the savant stuff is such a loophole because I think about Dr. Penancy Powell's major thing, which was like, look, if a science can understand or believe that certain things can happen and we don't know how that information got into a brain. Right, like, how can someone recite pi to the 30,000th digit?

• 47:56Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 47:56Ky Dickens?

  When calculators can't even do it.

• 47:57Speaker 02

  Right.

• 47:58Ky Dickens?

  You know, like, how? You know, so, why can't ESP be in that same list of savant skills with calendar computation? And I think if we could just do that, it would normalize it so much.

• 48:07Speaker 02

  Yeah, well, I think that's also, you know, part of what telepathy tapes has accomplished. It's seeing extrasensory perception as an ability, not as a, you know, freakish anomaly.

• 48:19Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 48:20Speaker 02

  But as something that has some sort of substrate, even if we don't know what it is. It has a substrate, there is a mechanism, there has to be a mechanism, because that's how we're seeing it, right? And there has to be a way for us to try and measure it. And I'm also a fan of there may be a collection of things that do not have the same kind of verifiability that we have with, you know, the amount of caffeine in a cup of tea, for example, just something I had to do in chemistry in college. But there can be, I think, a conversation about, do we have to have this notion that it either is or it isn't? Maybe it also is, but not all the time, and we're not exactly sure, and one day, hopefully, we'll get there.

• 49:01Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, no, 100%, I love that. And I think being comfortable in that, like, space where we don't know. We don't know.

• 49:08Speaker 02

  Correct.

• 49:08Ky Dickens?

  And we're not going to know for a very long time. I feel like so many of the non-speakers I've met have been so wonderful in trying to disseminate this, you know? And I think you're right with the sensory regulation and filtering and just perception of everything that's around and how that can be really awful if you can't filter everything out. But it can also be a blessing, in a way, that some other things are more able to be tuned into.

• 49:34Speaker 02

  Yeah, but I think also what makes people uncomfortable, and I think what makes a lot of people uncomfortable about the telepathy tapes and even this conversation, you know, imagine that for all of human history, we have not given any validity to the possibility that people who are non-verbal have a conscious experience. And we come from a very dark and tragic history of the ways that we have treated people who did not fit the norm. And I'm not just talking about all of the brilliant friends I know who were placed in special ed classes when that actually wasn't where the resources needed to go, right? I'm talking about, you know, in my own family, people who were institutionalized because

• 50:15Speaker 02

  in the 1950s, no one knew what to do with these people. And I'm friends with someone named Perry Finkelstein, who is nonverbal, and she talks about, and I actually recorded her, a TEDx talk for her, I was her voice. And she talked about being a child and hearing people talk about her and saying to herself, "I'm in here, like you don't know that I'm in here." And I think that makes people very, very uncomfortable. Because it does show centuries, if not thousands of years, of a problem with institutionalizing humans that did not always behave the way we wanted them to. It brings up a huge conversation about what we call mental illness.

• 50:58Speaker 02

  Because as we know from things like the, you know, Premonitions Bureau, there are people who see things before they happen, they also see other things that don't happen. But if they are predicting things that do happen, that kill hundreds of people, what does it say about the people who are in our institutions, who we call crazy? Makes people really uncomfortable. Or that other cultures have names for those people and they're often called shamans. And in Western culture, they're not called shamans.

• 51:29Ky Dickens?

  In season two, we started talking to more indigenous cultures, and I was so surprised how the Kuntanawa people talked about, in Brazil, this is wild, like, they talked about Tlalpana as their technology. And they said it's more powerful than any technology you have that can connect you to people or ideas around the world. We can do it too, but we can also connect with ancestors and like plants and the span. So like, our technology is better than yours, ours is just more ancient.

• 51:58Speaker 02

  That makes people very, very uncomfortable.

• 52:00Ky Dickens?

  I mean, talking to pretty much any indigenous population, the stuff is not wild. It is, you're a shaman, or you are a medicine woman or man, or you are... Really able to like inform on the hunt, like all these things used to be relied upon.

• 52:17Speaker 02

  And I think also the notion that you can get in touch with that by like, you know, doing an ayahuasca journey on your weekend and having a great time, it's an interesting and lovely notion, but I think what's also important to realize is that there's an entire culture around that kind of understanding of these phenomenon.

• 52:36Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 52:36Speaker 02

  And I think that's what's hard because we don't have that structure around it. In neuropsychology, we talk about these things all the time, right? And it's more kind of commonplace to be wondering about consciousness, to be thinking about what it means. But once it's introduced to the lay public, it very quickly can get commercialized, it can get dragged down, it can get diluted, it can get confusing. And I think that's where many people say it's not legitimate, right? And I think that's not fair.

• 53:06Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. Obviously, there's such cool, amazing, transformational research going on around psychedelics and how it can help people with mental illnesses. However, one thing that I don't think we're equipped to handle at all is the fact that people are talking about these spiritual revelations in it, and they are feeling a sense of oneness, and they do want to know where to go from there. And when we look at these cultures, and it was in Western, you know, history too, the use of psychedelics to try to open up your mind, it was an entire, there were rites around it, there are people that are leading these things, it was an absolutely beautiful, spiritual experience.

• 53:40Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 53:41Ky Dickens?

  And I fear, like, when you do it in a lab, we're not honoring it the way it was maybe meant to be with us, you know?

• 53:48Speaker 02

  I think it's a, it's a good point, it's a complicated point, and it's, I think, gets right to the heart of the challenge here. Because it is only when people like Rick Doblin could kind of push for like, for legislation and for, you know, being able to provide this proof, right? That you can publish a paper and you can search it on PubMed and you can see, oh, use of psychedelics, this, that, the other, right? Oh, it works in PTSD. It's a shame, right? But also, it does sort of, I think, lend itself to the kind of legitimacy that a lot of people look for.

• 54:23Ky Dickens?

  For sure.

• 54:24Speaker 02

  It is incredibly different and should be held distinct from indigenous use of especially these kinds of medicines. But, you know, I think that the history also of psychedelics, the government deciding that people who are so in touch with their consciousness and something bigger than themselves do not easily want to go to war to kill people that they don't know. It is part of the story as well. There's a politicization, right, of access to consciousness.

• 54:54Ky Dickens?

  Yeah, yeah. So I'm curious to know how researching paradigms and consciousness and talking to all the people you've talked to has influenced your faith. Because I know some people where when you start to ask these big questions, it freaks them out.

• 55:08Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 55:08Ky Dickens?

  And they're like, you can't even ask those. Or this idea that like, can you form and grow a deeper faith? Or like a more real version of faith for you that might be outside of the bounds of what you're raised with?

• 55:19Speaker 02

  Right. I think that these questions of consciousness, of psi phenomenon, I think they are very challenging to a traditional notion of a religious experience. And I'm kind of speaking Judeo-Christian foundation. You know, for me personally, I come from a tradition that lends itself to a lot of unknowability. And I think that's been a very convenient landing place for me. Because that is our tradition. You know, I was raised Jewish and there's a, you know, an enormous and very rich, you know, mystical tradition that goes along with our liturgy.

• 56:03Speaker 02

  Many people are not taught it, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. There's kind of like little bits and pieces of it, but you know, I was...

• 56:10Ky Dickens?

  Like Kabbalah Judaism?

• 56:12Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, like Kabbalah is one sort of branch, but even this notion that there was a darkness that had no name and no form before anything was created. And I don't use the Old Testament as a science book. That's not what it is. But the notion that whoever wrote that down, I'm even gonna go ahead and say that, whoever wrote that down was living in a time where this was a comfortable conversation, that there's an unknowability and a mystery that holds everything. And that mystery contracted before it expanded. And that we are living in a world that is a projection, right? It is, it's a projection. Like, for me, that's comfortable and it's where a lot of my psi phenomenon get thrown into that bucket.

• 56:56Speaker 02

  For people who don't have that, I would imagine it's a little more challenging. Because how do you reconcile this, you know, with a lot of traditional beliefs? And I am a very traditional person in that sense, but I think that there's a lot of grace. There's a lot of grace to be had when you see that all of the things that we comprehend are part of a consciousness that is held by a larger consciousness.

• 57:22Ky Dickens?

  Does it ever scare you?

• 57:24Speaker 02

  Yes. I get scared all the time. When I hear about things that I can't explain. It's very scary.

• 57:30Ky Dickens?

  Because we've even had internal meetings when we're talking about an episode or going through notes. And one of our beloved staff members really gets upset when stuff will come up about like a simulation. Or we get a lot of feedback from people where it'll be like, you know, the more we go into these depths, like the more it erases God. And I always think of like the example of the rainbow. And Newton and Keats were in a big argument around this. Like, if you unweave the rainbow, you're unraveling God, which isn't true to me.

• 57:55Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, my answer to that is you need a bigger God.

• 57:57Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 57:58Speaker 02

  You need a God that can hold all of this. And, you know, if you're looking for certainty, you will not find it in these realms. And the comfort that you don't have to figure it all out, for me, is a highly religious concept. I'm not God, right? If I was, I'd be controlling a lot more, you know? But you need a bigger God. Because there is nothing that we are experiencing that is not explainable in the universe that holds our ability to fathom it.

• 58:31Ky Dickens?

  Right.

• 58:31Speaker 02

  You know, there's literally nothing. And, you know, there's a mystical concept in Judaism that if God stops thinking about us for even a fraction of a millisecond, we don't exist anymore, right? That our existence is predicated on something bigger than us holding us, right? And whether that's gravity, whatever you want it to be. That's what's holding all of this. And to me, it's like, this is the unpeeling. This is the peeling back of that onion, right? And it's infinite. It's infinite. And what an amazing capacity we've been given as human beings to be able to have these conversations, to be able to love, to be able to be afraid, to grieve, right? All of these experiences.

• 59:14Speaker 02

  And I think, you know, in terms of this stuff, like, it's the same notion as if you want God to be good all the time. And you want to say, this is good and that's bad. I got sick when I wished I could go on that date. That's bad. It all just is. It's just happening. And it's not that I don't believe that there's forces of darkness and lightness. But the notion that you can ascribe any of that to the world we're living in, to me, is it's setting yourself up for a very rigid perspective. And so when things like psi phenomenon come in, it doesn't fit the paradigm, and it's stupid, and it's ridiculous. Which is why atheists fall into the same, I think, the same challenge.

• 59:54Ky Dickens?

  Well, and I also think there's a hubris that maybe us trying to understand this stuff would be like a gnat trying to understand like how to get to a mall and go shopping. Like, I mean, there's just no, there's no context for it. Because it's so outside of your everyday life.

• 1:00:08Speaker 02

  And how do you get comfortable in that? How do you not reject it? How do you not push back against it? How do you say, there's things that I won't know and I can be okay with that? You know, if you've ever had one moment in meditation of forgetting that you're thinking about the fact that you're meditating, like, that moment is what we're chasing, right? And it's fleeting. And you'll get like little bits of it. We're living from like that moment to the next one.

• 1:00:33Ky Dickens?

  Yeah. Is there anything that's on their highs and scientifically that you're really excited about? Maybe something that's just come across your path where you're like, holy cow, we're talking about that now?

• 1:00:41Speaker 02

  Oh, gosh. I mean, conversations about consciousness, like reaching the mainstream of science, I think is really, really special. I think talking about special abilities. I think talking about, really, all of this stuff, where a lot of my podcast also kind of resides. That's exciting. I think the fact that we can talk about diagnoses without shame is really miraculous. I know that there are a lot of things I should know about regarding AI and technology that honestly, it really scares me. I'm a real, I'm an intentional Luddite. And so I know that there's a lot that I don't understand that is happening. Like Greg Braden, you know, tells us that like we're all gonna be like fused with microchips at some point.

• 1:01:26Speaker 02

  I get very nervous about that. I tend to stay away from it. And I just sort of am like, what am I eating for dinner? You know? So there's a lot that, again, because I'm not also in like current neuroscience, you know, fields I don't touch on. Yeah.

• 1:01:40Ky Dickens?

  And I guess the final question, and one that could either give me hope or not hope, is like, do you think science is slowly changing? Like, I do think like 50 years ago, these questions would be considered just absolutely so fringe. You'd be apps thrown out. You could never get tenure. You would just could never get published. Like, in 20, 30 years, do you think the landscape will be different?

• 1:02:02Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think we've come a long way. And I think even though I get down about the dualists, we've come a tremendously long way. And the fact that even we're talking about placebo as an example of a shift in perception, a shift in agency and a shift in attention as methods to help us heal, that's already astounding. I think the fact that near-death experiences are becoming something we talk about, that there's information to be gleaned from that, I think has already shown how far we've come. And, you know, even when Jonathan and I had Lee Harris on the podcast, who literally thought we were punking him, he's like, why would you want to speak to a channeler? Like, I'm not even in this realm.

• 1:02:44Speaker 02

  And I think the fact that like people are open to saying, what does it feel like in your body? Like, where are you dropping into? Right? That's shown how far we've come. And I have to believe that it's going to continue to expand. I wonder what world our kids will be experiencing when they are our age. I hope that I'm proven right, just because moms want to be proven right, and I want my kids to be like, she was right. Yeah, I think we're gonna open up more and more. I think we're gonna find more comfort in our lack of ability to quantify things the way other people want. And I do think we're gonna start seeing ways to visualize what is not yet seen.

• 1:03:23Ky Dickens?

  And if there's a paradigm on the horizon that might replace the current one? I mean, is there any, is there any paradigm you'd put your money on?

• 1:03:32Speaker 02

  No. I mean, and I say no because, you know, my tradition teaches that there is a messianic age when we will all love each other. And when we will all have tremendous compassion for each other's suffering and each other's challenges. I remain hopeful that even if that is delayed, that that is on the horizon. Like, we were not placed here to hate. I'm certain of that. And no matter how challenging the political situation is, how challenging the scientific community feels by telepathy, I have to believe that there will be an increase in love, openness, rights, and yeah, an expansion of belief.

• 1:04:17Ky Dickens?

  Yeah.

• 1:04:17Speaker 02

  Look at me being hopeful.

• 1:04:18Ky Dickens?

  I know. I am so happy about your hopeful ending. I was like, this could go one of two ways. We're gonna leave here feeling sad.

• 1:04:24Speaker 02

  Oh, I usually make people feel sad, yes.

• 1:04:27Ky Dickens?

  Okay, that was great. Thank you, Mayim, for joining us.

• 1:04:30Speaker 02

  Thank you. This was really great.

• 1:04:31Ky Dickens?

  That's it for this episode of The Talk Tracks. But new episodes will be released every Wednesday, so stay tuned as we work to unravel all the threads, even the veiled ones that knit together our reality. And please remember to stay kind, stay curious, and that being a true skeptic requires an open mind. Thank you to my amazing collaborators. Producers Katherine Ellis and Selena Kennedy, technical directing, audio mix and finishing by Jeremy Cole, opening and closing music by Elizabeth P. W., and original logo and cover art by Ben Kandora Design. I'm Kai Dickens, your executive producer, writer, and host.